SOLVED Values Guide
SOLVED Values Guide
Your
Values
Guide
Introduction
Introduction
Eight years ago, I wrote a book called The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck:
A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life.
The book struck a nerve. It’s sold over 17 million copies, reached #1 in
thirteen different countries, and spent over 320 weeks on the New York
Times bestseller list.
And I believe it broke through all the noise for a simple reason. No, not
the F-Bombs (most of the translations did not have profanity in the title
and it still reached #1 in those countries). The book broke through
because it addressed the central existential question of the 21st
century:
And this is a huge problem. Because, as we’ll see in this episode, living
up to your own values is possibly the most important component of
stable mental health and sustained happiness in life. When you lack
clarity on what’s important, or feel as though you are constantly being
forced to split attention between what’s important and what’s not, then
you feel stuck—as though movement in any direction leads to the same
The goal of this guide (and podcast episode) is to help you navigate
through the sea of noise to find what truly matters to you, and then
dedicate your life to it in a healthy way.
And should you do this, it will have massive benefits in your day-to-day
existence. Decades of research demonstrate that people who discover
and embody their values experience:
1
Creswell JD, Welch WT, Taylor SE, Sherman DK, Gruenewald TL, Mann T. Affirmation of personal
values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychol Sci. 2005
Nov;16(11):846-51
2
Ceary, Chris & Donahue, John & Shaffer, Katharine. (2019). The Strength of Pursuing Your Values:
Valued Living as a Path to Resilience among College Students. Stress and Health. 35.
● More Motivation and Drive: Values give you a powerful why. They
ignite your internal motivation and help you stick to your goals,
making it more likely that you’ll achieve outcomes that truly
satisfy you.
Ultimately, our values matter because we all feel torn between our own
desires and needs and the expectations placed upon us by society.
Getting clarity on our values and aligning ourselves to them is the
easiest way to resolve this anxiety and live in a meaningful and
impactful way within the world.
3
Bayly B, Bumpus MF. Predictors and Implications of Values Clarity in First-Year College Students.
Coll Stud J. 2020 Mar 15;53(4):397-404.
4
Gómez-López M, Viejo C, Ortega-Ruiz R. Well-Being and Romantic Relationships: A Systematic
Review in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul
7;16(13):2415.
There is a lot to digest here. But if you take the time to work
through it and integrate it into your life, it can be utterly
transformative.
But I have to warn you, there is a lot of difficult introspection that
comes along with this. No one got clear on their deepest core
values under a beach umbrella. Chances are, you will have to ask
yourself some uncomfortable questions.
But that’s good. That discomfort is how you know you are growing.
Table of Contents
Why Your Values Matter 7
Beyond Happiness 8
Three Common Problems Related to Values 12
What Are Values? 15
Defining Values: Six Characteristics 18
Trying On New Values 21
The Values Wheel 21
Terminal vs. Instrumental Values 25
What Are Good Values? 28
Values and Psychological Well-Being 28
Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue and Balance 33
Values and Your Relationships 36
Having Shared Values Doesn't Necessarily Mean Having Identical
Values 36
Values are What You’re Actually Arguing About 37
The Relationship Values Hierarchy 37
Your Relationship Reveals What You Really Value 38
Values Drift (And Why People Grow Apart) 38
Love Is Empty Without Respect 39
Where Do Our Values Come From? 41
The Grid-Group Framework: Four Types of Social Values 43
The Nature Argument: Moral Foundations Theory 49
Balancing Cultural Values at the Societal Level— Plato’s Republic
Revisited 54
Determining Your Core Values 57
The truth is, most people aren’t unhappy because they’re doing the
wrong thing—they’re unhappy because they’re doing it for the wrong
reasons.
To live an enriching and fulfilling life, you need to live out what you care
about, which demands that you sometimes give up your own pleasure
and happiness for what you value.
This is where you get the paradox that a true deep sense of happiness
requires some degree of struggle and sacrifice. And deciding what
you're willing to struggle and sacrifice for is determined by your values.
5
Klussman K, Curtin N, Langer J, Nichols AL. The Importance of Awareness, Acceptance, and
Alignment With the Self: A Framework for Understanding Self-Connection. Eur J Psychol. 2022 Feb
25;18(1):120-131.
By contrast, when you don't know what value you're suffering for, then
suffering feels meaningless.
Life feels pointless, even cruel. All this suffering—and for what?
Beyond Happiness
The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, in the Nicomachean Ethics,
wrote that there were two “forms” of happiness—hedonia and
eudaimonia.6
6
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. W. D. Ross, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan
Barnes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), X.1, 1172a.
But in the 1980s, psychologist Carol Ryff brought the Aristotelian view
back. In a landmark study, Ryff found that prevailing measures of
happiness neglected crucial aspects of positive functioning.7
Ryff showed that someone could have positive emotions yet lack
purpose or personal growth—which means they might be “happy” in a
shallow sense but not truly fulfilled.8 Her research demonstrated that
living according to one’s deeper values is critical for well-being, even if it
doesn’t always make you “happy” in the short term. Eudaimonia, as it
turns out, really is more important to happiness.
In everyday life, this means that aligning your actions with your values
can provide a stable form of long-term satisfaction. For example, if one
of your core values is family, investing time in your family relationships
will likely bring a deep sense of fulfillment, even if it’s sometimes
challenging or doesn’t make you happy every moment. If another value
is creativity, pursuing a creative project may involve stress or effort, but
ultimately leads to feeling alive and true to yourself. Ryff’s insight is
that these value-driven pursuits contribute hugely to psychological
well-being, often more than transient pleasures do.
time. In Baumeister’s words, people need to feel their life fits into some
broader purpose—that their actions are serving what they believe is
right.9
Since then, psychology has found that aligning our actions and values is
one of the most important components of mental health, period. Living
according to your values can act like a built-in stress reducer for your
mind and body. When you make choices that honor your core beliefs,
you experience less internal conflict.11
9
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. Guilford Press.
10
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource:
Assessment, controversies, update. In M. P. Zanna & J. Olson (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 67–127). Academic Press.
11
Creswell JD, Welch WT, Taylor SE, Sherman DK, Gruenewald TL, Mann T. Affirmation of personal
values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychol Sci. 2005
Nov;16(11):846-51.
Research has found that when people pursue goals or activities that
reflect their true values, they tend to experience fewer symptoms of
anxiety and depression over time.12
When your actions match your beliefs, you experience less mental
friction. This cognitive alignment leads to clearer thinking and more
confident decision-making, without the fog of regret or self-doubt.
And if that wasn’t enough, values give you a powerful why. They ignite
your internal motivation and help you stick to your goals, making it more
likely that you’ll achieve outcomes that truly satisfy you.
In summary, values are like the North Star for meaning and self-control:
they help answer “What’s it all for?” and thereby empower us to manage
our lives more effectively.
12
Ceary, Chris & Donahue, John & Shaffer, Katharine. (2019). The Strength of Pursuing Your Values:
Valued Living as a Path to Resilience among College Students. Stress and Health. 35.
13
Bayly B, Bumpus MF. Predictors and Implications of Values Clarity in First-Year College Students.
Coll Stud J. 2020 Mar 15;53(4):397-404.
1. Lack of Clarity about One’s Values: It’s not unusual to go through
life without ever explicitly identifying what your core values are.
You might feel vaguely unsatisfied or directionless, drifting
through life like a plastic bag in the breeze, not realizing that you
haven’t articulated what truly matters to you.
Psychology calls this a lack of values clarity. Research shows that
low values clarity is associated with a sense of aimlessness and
lack of motivation. In contrast, gaining clarity about your values
often provides direction and motivation.14
But the question then becomes, what are our values? And how do we
figure them out?
15
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. W. D. Ross, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan
Barnes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), II.5, 1106b
16
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.Online Readings in
Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
17
Understanding values: Schwartz theory of basic values. (2022, May 16). Integration and
Implementation Insights.
Needs are just that: necessary. Without them, your brain falls apart.
Values are what you care about once your needs are met, and they often
dictate how you go about meeting your needs. You need to have
relationships and you value honesty—therefore, you seek out honest
relationships.
One way to think about it is that our values are strategies to consistently
meet our needs. And depending on our personality traits, physical traits,
environment, and upbringing, we will naturally devise different
strategies to meet the same universal needs.
Someone who is introverted and has obscure interests may satisfy their
need for belonging by highly valuing loyalty to a small group of
long-term friends. Whereas someone who is highly extroverted with a
wide range of friends and interests may value adventure instead.
Values are, at some level, chosen. Needs are not. Values can change.
Needs cannot. Values answer the question, “Who am I and who do I want
to become?” Needs answer the question, “What do I need to survive?”
While all needs are values, not all values are needs.
To put it all together imagine you need to make a career decision. You
might have a need for financial security, a preference for living in a big
city, and a value of autonomy. All three could factor into your career
choice. Needs might push you toward a stable job offer, preferences
might make you lean toward the job in your favorite city, but your core
value of autonomy might draw you to a job that allows you some
freedom to operate without a large corporate hierarchy. Understanding
these differences can help clarify why we often feel internally
conflicted about major life decisions. Part of personal growth is learning
But the most prominent framework for values in psychology came from
Shalom Schwartz in the 1980s and 90s. In his framework, he said values
have six characteristics:19
1. Are linked to emotion. People feel strongly about what they value.
When a value is activated, it is infused with feeling. For instance,
someone who values independence will feel anxious if their
freedom is threatened, helpless if they cannot protect it, and
happy when they can fully exercise it. In this sense, our values are,
in many ways, extensions of ourselves (more on that below).
2. Motivate action. Values inspire not only your goals, but the pursuit
of them, as well. Those who prioritize social order, justice, or
18
Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Values. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–5).
19
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in
Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Let's take the next step and make it more concrete. Luckily for us,
psychologists have come up with various frameworks that we can use as
a starting point in determining which values to pursue in our lives.
Self-transcendence
Conservation
Self-enhancement
Openness to change
Adapted from
Schwartz, S. H. (2006,) Basic Human Values: An Overview.
In this model, values that sit next to each other share similar motivations
and can be pursued together, while values on opposite sides tend to
conflict.
At the basis of this model are two key value conflicts that take place
within us:
Recognizing that this is normal can help us strive for balance, rather
than judging ourselves or feeling we must choose one or the other
absolutely.
20
Rokeach, M. The Nature of Human Values; Free Press: London, UK, 1973.
21
Rokeach, M. (1973). Values List of Milton Rokeach
Terminal values tend to occupy the top goals in this hierarchy, while
instrumental values serve as guiding principles or tools to achieve those
goals. For example, someone might highly value the terminal goal of
“family security” and thus also value the instrumental qualities of
“responsibility” and “hard work” as the means to secure and care for
their family.
What makes a value “good”? And how do we identify values that could
potentially be hurting us?
Adapted from Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
22
Ryff C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of
eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28.
Autonomy
Environmental mastery
Personal growth
Low scorer Has few close, trusting relationships with others; finds it
difficult to be warm, open, concerned about others; is
isolated and frustrated in interpersonal relationships; not
willing to make compromises to sustain important ties
with others
Purpose in life
High scorer Has goals in life and a sense of directedness; feels there
is meaning to present and past life; holds beliefs that give
life purpose; has aims and objectives for living
Low scorer Lacks a sense of meaning in life; has few goals or aims,
lacks sense of direction; does not see purpose in past life;
has no outlooks or beliefs that give life meaning
Self-acceptance
The Aristotelian view is timeless and has two key implications for good
values that we must not forget:
1. Good values are in the middle ground between extremes. This
means that even values that sound “good” can become
problematic if taken to an extreme without regard to context.
2. Virtues work as a set; harmony among values is key. Do not forget
Schwartz’s Value Wheel. All Values are only as useful when they
are in balance with other values.
This leads to a very important but subtle truth: good values are
self-reinforcing. Adopting one good value makes adopting others easier.
Adopting one bad value makes adopting other bad values easier.
Which brings us to the next question: how do you actually change your
values? How do you get yourself to stop prioritizing something you wish
you didn’t prioritize?
You don’t need a partner who values everything you value. You need one
who respects what you value, and who’s willing to support it—even
when they don’t share it. Conflict comes not from differences, but from
invalidation.
Probably not.
The sooner you can decode the value underneath the complaint, the
faster you can get to the root issue—and the less likely you are to blow
up over stupid shit again.
Try this: Each partner ranks their top 5 values. Then you each share one
you’re willing to compromise on, and one that’s a hard non-negotiable.
Then talk.
This is one of the harshest truths in life: your relationship is a mirror for
your real values—not the ones you post about, but the ones you live.
The stuff you’re willing to fight for, sacrifice for, walk away for. That’s
your actual code.
Most long-term breakups don’t happen because of one big event. They
happen because no one noticed the drift. What mattered most five years
ago isn’t what matters now. But no one talked about it. So now you’re
two people, living two lives, with two value systems—and a silent
roommate in between.
Schedule a “values check-in” like you schedule a date night. Ask each
other: “What’s been mattering most to you lately?” and “Is there
anything I’ve stopped seeing or supporting in you?”
The good news and the flipside to this is that your values can also grow
closer together. But that does require a mutual respect for each other's
values.
Speaking of respect…
You can love someone and violate their boundaries. You can love
someone and gaslight them. You can love someone and slowly hollow
them out by ignoring what matters to them.
Respect is what makes love safe. It’s the value that protects all other
values. And if you can’t respect each other’s values, the love will rot.
Not all values can be bridged. But they can always be revealed.
And when they are, they tell you exactly what kind of love you’re
building—or whether it’s time to stop building at all.
She concluded that values are arbitrary and relative. There is nothing
inherently better or worse about prudence, or cleanliness, or modesty,
as defined by Western morals. These things are relative, she argued,
and completely made up.23
But she was not deterred. A few years later, Mead went to New Guinea,
where she studied the Arapesh, Mundugumor, and Tchambuli tribes.
Trudging through mud-soaked jungle paths and paddling canoes along
winding rivers, she documented wildly different temperaments. Some
tribes valued cooperation among both men and women, while others
praised aggression for all. In Tchambuli villages, she watched women
oversee trade and governance, with men devoting themselves to ritual
adornment. These observations formed the basis of her book “Sex and
Temperament in Three Primitive Societies,” challenging Western notions
23
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for Western
civilisation. William Morrow.
Throughout her life, Mead argued that culture molds individuals in ways
once assumed to be fixed by nature—values are relative, socially
constructed, and imposed from without. From the sunlit beaches of
Samoa to the dense forests of New Guinea, she revealed that the world
is a tapestry of human possibilities, demonstrating that understanding
unfamiliar ways of life can help us grasp our own.
For example, Mead observed that Samoan society had a very relaxed
approach to adolescent sexuality compared to the puritanical norms of
American society at that time.
Cultural relativism does not mean that all values are equally beneficial
in every sense, it means that we should understand values within a
broader cultural context. Mead believed that before passing judgment,
one should ask: What function does this value serve in this culture and its
environment?
A ritual or norm that seems strange from outside may have an internal
logic to it.
Mead’s ideas were quite radical in an era when a lot of people thought
Western civilization’s values were morally supreme. She asserted that
24
Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York, NY: William Morrow.
so-called “primitive” cultures had rich lessons for the modern world.
This idea was unheard of at the time.
Mead’s work was the introduction of the idea that we should reflect on
which values are truly ours vs. those merely absorbed from our
culture. Sometimes we carry values only because everyone around us
does, not because we consciously opted into them.
Adapted from Caulkins, D. D. (1999). Is Mary Douglas’s Grid/Group Analysis Useful for Cross-Cultural Research?
Cross-Cultural Research
25
Douglas, M. 1999. Four cultures: the evolution of a parsimonious model. Geojournal 47:411-415.
By assigning high and low values to grid and group, Douglas identified
four ways of organizing, perceiving, and justifying social relations
(called “ways of life” or “social solidarities”).
Douglas theorized that each type of social structure fosters its own
typical “culture”—a set of beliefs, values, and biases that feel naturally
right to its members.26
People “accept what makes sense to them, and what makes sense to
them depends in large part on their social environment,” Douglas
explained.27 This framework, though abstract, bridges anthropology and
sociology by suggesting patterned ways that social context influences
psychology: our perceptions of risk, morality, or reality itself are filtered
through the lens our community provides.
26
Grid-group cultural theory.(n.d.-b).
27
Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
(Original work published 1966)
In fact, Douglas argued that each type tends to accuse the others of
moral failure, because they prioritize different values. For instance, a
strongly hierarchical person values respect and duty, and might see
individualists as lacking loyalty, and egalitarians as lacking respect for
proper authority. An egalitarian values equality and inclusion, and might
see individualists as greedy, and hierarchs as cruel or rigid.
28
Gray, K., DiMaggio, N., Schein, C., & Kachanoff, F. (2023). The Problem of Purity in Moral
Psychology. Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality
and Social Psychology, Inc, 27(3), 272–308.
29
Clemens, E. S. (1991). Review of Cultural Theory., by M. Thompson, R. Ellis, & A. Wildavsky. American
Journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1571–1573.
same results. For example, hierarchy gives stability but can become
oppressive if unchecked by egalitarian calls for justice. Individualism
brings innovation, but needs some communal or hierarchical structure
to not devolve into chaos. Egalitarian groups pursue noble causes but
can become insular or impractical without some individual initiative or
formal organization.
And more importantly, can you live among people with opposing values?
Today, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt is most famous for his work
around social media and its effect on mental health. But before he was a
celebrity academic, he quietly began his research studying morality and
values from a social and evolutionary perspective.
30
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Viking.
31
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon
Books.
32
A 2023 paper found that this can actually be divided into two foundations reflecting fairness as
equality and fairness as proportionality (equity).
At this point, this list will sound familiar. It is strikingly similar to Carol
Ryff’s Six Dimensions of Well-Being, as well as Shalom Schwartz’s Ten
Universal Values.
The difference lies in the fact that twin studies have shown that moral
attitudes and values are, to some extent, heritable.34 What’s most
striking, however, is how closely these moral foundations align with
political orientation.
33
While this is widely accepted as a 6th foundation, there is still some debate about whether or not
it's universal or more of a WEIRD cultural foundation. That said, it's sometimes included in a "6+"
model with fairness being split into two foundations: equality and proportionality.
34
Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). Genetic evidence for multiple biological mechanisms underlying
ingroup favoritism. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1253–1258.
What this means for you: Knowing about moral foundations can help
you understand why you personally feel moral emotions in certain
situations.
35
Wajzer, M., & Dragan, W. Ł. (2021). It Is Not Only the Environment That Matters: A Short Introduction
to Research on the Heritability of Political Attitudes. Political Studies Review, 21(1), 144-161.
Haidt’s theory says moral judgments arise from intuition first, then
reason justifies them later. But unlike cognitive dissonance and
motivated reason, your moral foundations are likely lodged in place.
Over time, these moral foundations form the basis for our highest values
and principles.
Rosa Parks had spent years quietly organizing, learning, and watching.
And when the moment came—when she was told to stand up and move
to the back of the bus—she didn’t just say no to a bus driver. She said
no to an entire value system. In a moment of social leverage, she took
her value and inserted it into the wider system around her, causing an
ongoing chain reaction that would shift the entire cultural value system
around her.
Her decision wasn't about rebellion for rebellion’s sake. It was about
alignment. About saying, “This is where I stand. This is who I am. And I’m
not getting up.” Her courage didn’t come from rage. It came from clarity.
From a deep, immovable sense that justice, dignity, and equality were
non-negotiable.
That’s what it looks like when someone lives their values in real time. It’s
not grand. It’s not loud. It’s not a Hollywood speech. Sometimes it’s just
sitting still—and refusing to move.
You may find this notion of “balancing” cultural values via activism or
politics to be strange. But it is, in fact, the underlying idea behind
western political philosophy.
Justice for Plato was essentially each part of society valuing its
appropriate role and not infringing on others’—a harmony or balance
among different value spheres. He warned that injustice occurs when
one set of values consumes and overthrows the other values. Just as the
tyranny of one dominating value can destroy society, so can the
certainty or obsession of one value destroy an individual.36
36
Plato. (1991). The Republic of Plato: Second Edition (A. Bloom, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Basic Books. (Original
work published ca. 380 B.C.E.) Book IV, Section 2.
In modern terms, one could say a good society finds a mix of liberty
(individualist values), equality (egalitarian values), and order (hierarchical
values)—reminiscent of the French motto “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité.”
Politics, then, is essentially the argument over which values should be
prioritized and how to structure them.
Plato believed the solution was to have these classes integrated under
wise rule, with everyone accepting a common value of justice.
If the game of life is a balancing act of value against value, then the
balancer must have wisdom to evaluate what is worth caring about and
what is not worth caring about, and then the practicality to alter her
actions accordingly. Practical wisdom is so important that Aristotle went
as far as to imply that you could consider it the only virtue, as no other
virtue was possible without it.37
37
Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of
Aristotle (Vol. 2, pp. 1729–1867). Princeton University Press. (Original work published ca. 350 BCE)
Another way to think about it—if you could pursue something with no
fear of shame, embarrassment or failure, what would you pursue?
These sorts of mental exercises are useful because they help clarify
what we actually value and care about. Our values often get muted or
hidden from us by the pressures and expectations put on us by the
people around us. So one way to gather clarity is to imagine a life
without that expectation and without that pressure.
Another way to think about it is, ideally, how do you want to show up for
the world around you? What do you want to be known for? Like
Mandela, what mission or cause or idea are you willing to withstand
ridicule and judgment?
Below are a few powerful exercises that can start giving you clues
around what matters most.
And, if you’d like more exercises to try, I’ll have one simple action
step for each day of the month to help you clarify, assess, and
build your life around your values inside my membership
community Momentum. You can learn more and join us here.
What would you spend your time doing? Would you read a bunch of
books? Watch a bunch of movies? Listen to new music? Work on your
favorite hobbies? Write that novel? Write poetry? Build out that
business idea? Study astrophysics? Work on those bicep curls?
● Make your list: List the top 3-5 things you would spend most of
your time doing. These are huge clues to some of your most
important core values.
● Identify the gap: Compare this to the way you currently spend
your time. How big of a gap can you identify here? Obviously, there
are some things we just have to do in life whether we want to or
not. But ideally, you want your real life to reflect this hypothetical
life to the greatest extent possible.
The value of this exercise is found in taking away all the outside social
pressure to conform to the values of others. It's just you and you alone.
A large gap between your desert island self and your real-life self
probably means you're allowing other people to define your values for
you.
Example: When Maya did the Desert Island Exercise, she pictured her
days filled with sketching, writing stories, and studying
philosophy—things she barely touched in her corporate job. She
realized creativity, self-expression, and lifelong learning were core
values she'd been neglecting. The gap was clear: her real life was all
deadlines and meetings. So, she started carving out time for creative
projects and enrolled in a philosophy course—not to change careers,
but to better align her life with what mattered most.
Picture yourself at the end of a long, fulfilling life. A close friend stands
up to deliver your eulogy—what do you hope they’ll say about you?
Frustration as a Clue
Sometimes the things that irritate us are signposts for the values we
hold dearest. For instance, if laziness in coworkers drives you up the
wall, you might prize diligence or competence. If dishonesty makes you
see red, integrity could be at the heart of your moral compass.
Example: Dara noticed that anytime a friend told even a small fib, she
felt disproportionately upset. Realizing her frustration pointed to
honesty as a core value, she resolved to practice it more transparently in
her own life, and gently let others know it mattered to her.
By identifying what frustrates you, you reveal the virtues you think are
worth protecting. That newly discovered value could lead you toward
choices, activities, or relationships that honor it—and away from those
that don’t.
Example: John found both “adventure” and “security” on his list. After
ranking them, he realized that he’d choose a spontaneous road trip over
staying in his comfort zone, which helped him see that he values
exploration more than absolute stability.
Some of the content in this guide can feel abstract, so keep these
values in mind as you go through it to help you make the ideas
more concrete as they relate to your own life. And remember, if
you want to go deeper and continue this process of understanding
and clarifying your values, then making an action plan to build
your life around them—you can always jump into Momentum.
In the book, I made the point that, “Not giving a fuck does not mean
being indifferent; it means being comfortable with being different.” This
is a call to question the default values that drive our behavior. It’s about
recognizing that caring less about socially conditioned values frees you
to care more about what actually matters to you.
But you also must choose what you value wisely—because there are
good values, and there are, well, shitty values.
● Being right
● Feeling good all the time
● Always being positive
● Being admired
● Never being wrong or failing
● External
● Emotionally reactive
● In conflict with real growth
So what do good values look like? Well, I argued that good values are:
● Reality-based
● Socially constructive
● Immediate and controllable
These include:
These values sit at the top of a better hierarchy because they generate
long-term fulfillment, not just short-term gratification.
And a foundational concept I’ve pushed for years now is this: every value
you choose demands sacrifice. If you choose honesty, you sacrifice
approval. If you value depth, you give up simplicity. You can't avoid
trade-offs, only choose better ones.
A value hierarchy isn't about more, it's about choosing what you’re willing
to give up.
Values don’t just compete with one another—they come at the cost of
one another.
Each value, when chosen, has an associated cost. A person who chooses
stability may have to forgo novelty. A person who values independence
may be forced to endure loneliness. A person who values mastery must
embrace repetition, boredom, and delay. The question is not whether
you suffer, but whether your suffering is in service to something that
actually matters to you.
Choosing your values, then, is also choosing your pain. You’re not just
identifying ideals you admire—you’re implicitly saying, “This is the kind
of discomfort I’m willing to endure.” Because every meaningful pursuit
comes with discomfort. This is the trade-off behind what Aristotle called
eudaimonia—a fulfillment built not through pleasure, but through
purposeful sacrifice.
When you consciously define your values—and own the discomfort they
require—you start to reclaim your agency. You begin to move through
life not as a person avoiding pain, but as someone choosing which pain
is worth it.
So, the next time you feel overwhelmed or conflicted, ask yourself:
What value am I struggling for right now? Is it worth the price I’m
paying?
Why? Because to him, living without truth was no life at all. He famously
said, “the unexamined life is not worth living.” And not only did he
believe it, did he value it, but he was willing to die for it.
Because integrity mattered to him more than comfort. Because the soul,
he believed, was nourished not by safety or success or status—but by
the pursuit of wisdom and the courage to live it, even when it costs you
everything.
relevant today:
Adapted from Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. Free Press.
These Value Hierarchies are at the core of our personality and identity.
They are the central determinants of our beliefs, attitudes, behaviors,
self-worth, and sense of purpose.
39
20th WCP: A study on the hierarchy of Values. (n.d.).
It is also important to note that we can easily lie to ourselves about our
own values. Perhaps you say and even believe that you value
compassion—but if your actions are not compassionate, then it is hard
to argue that you actually do. We will come back to this discrepancy
between belief and action much later—it is important!
In sum, values serve as guiding principles that shape our beliefs about
what is right or wrong, influence our everyday choices, and ultimately
contribute to the construction of our identity and decision-making when
we are presented with multiple options.
40
Jadaszewski, Stefan (2018) Milton Rokeach's Experimental Modification of Values: Navigating
Relevance, Ethics and Politics in Social Psychological Research. Psychology from the Margins: Vol. 1,
Article 2.https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/psychologyfromthemargins/vol1/iss1/2
Why? Because what mattered to him wasn’t just getting out—it was
getting out right. His value wasn’t freedom at any cost. It was justice.
Dignity. The belief that all people, regardless of color, deserve equal
treatment under the law. He was willing to sacrifice decades of his
preferences to uphold that value—he didn’t eat the food he wanted to
eat, or talk to the people he wanted to talk to.
But his values remained steadfast through to the end. And that’s why we
respect him so much, that simple unwillingness to give in to basic needs
and preference for the sake of his values. This is, in many ways, how we
understand morality, and define a “good life.”
This is also part of the skill of living a values-based life. Honesty. Being
honest with your own actions and motivations — knowing when you’re
full of shit.
Because, as we’ll see, the human mind has an endless capacity to trick
itself in order to get what it wants. Generally, your mind wants what’s
easy, tangible and immediate—it wants its lower values…
Unless you change them.
Festinger was intrigued by how strongly people held onto a belief in the
face of skepticism and ridicule.
They rationalized the failed prediction by concluding that their faith had
“saved the world” from destruction. Instead of dropping their belief,
Cognitive Dissonance
This paradoxical outcome—people becoming more committed after
being proven wrong—inspired Festinger to study it further. And it would
lead to one of the most seminal discoveries in the history of psychology:
cognitive dissonance.41
41
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological
study of a modern group that predicted the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press.
42
Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive Dissonance. Scientific American, 207(4), 93–106
43
Croyle, R. T., & Cooper, J. (1983). Dissonance arousal: Physiological evidence. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 45(4), 782–791.
44
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview
of current perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon-Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a
pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association.
Surprisingly, later the $1 group reported actually felt more guilt about
lying than the $20 group.
Why?
Because the $20 liars had enough external justification (“I lied because
I got paid well”) so their value of honesty remained unchanged—they
felt no internal conflict.
45
Oshikawa, S. (1969). Can Cognitive Dissonance Theory Explain Consumer Behavior? Journal of
Marketing, 33(4), 44–49.
Put another way, our values follow our behaviors… even if we don’t like
the behaviors.
46
Rokeach, M. (1973). Self‐confrontation and confrontation with another as determinants of
long‐term value change. In The nature of human values. Free Press.
For personal growth, this suggests a subtle but important strategy: the
action comes first, the value second. Not the other way around.
But the story of the cult and Marian Keech is a warning: if we are in
cognitive dissonance and don’t take the opportunity to change, we are
likely to cement ourselves even further into our old values and
behaviors.
Self-Confrontation
The lesson here is that values can change when we force ourselves into
the discomfort of acting them out. But that change can only happen if
we are honest with ourselves in a way that might be uncomfortable.
One way is to honestly rank your values and then reflect if your
behaviors match your ideal of who you want to be. If you place
“achievement” and “wealth” at the very top of your values pyramid and
“benevolence” or “family” much lower, yet you spend your life taking
care of your family and no time on your own goals, this dissonance
means one of two things: either you value family more than you thought,
or you’re avoiding or ignoring what you truly value.
Another approach: write out what you spend your time on and also write
a short “eulogy” or “mission statement” of how you want to be
remembered. Compare the two lists—any inconsistencies? If your
eulogy says “She was generous and always there for others” but your
values list didn’t mention helping others once, that might create
cognitive dissonance, encouraging you to nurture generosity as a value
moving forward.
As the dark tragedies of the human condition were behind us, it was
time for a more positive outlook on human nature. How could we
become more productive, more fulfilled, more self-actualized?
But this never fully sat right with one psychologist in particular—a voice
that would go unheard for decades.
He believed that personal growth often feels like breaking down. Not
building up.
This turns everything we’ve been taught upside down. Most people think
mental pain means something’s wrong. Dąbrowski believed it might
You might stop chasing status. You might question your values. You
might feel totally lost!
Dabrowski’s ideas languished behind the Iron Curtain for a few decades
before they were rediscovered by scholars. Today, his work is largely
recognized as the predecessor of a fascinating theory called
Post-Traumatic Growth.
Common value shifts after trauma include: greater appreciation for life,
changed priorities like valuing relationships over material success, and
strengthened spirituality or personal convictions.
But trauma can also fracture the value system. Someone who has been
betrayed might begin to devalue trust, becoming more guarded, cynical,
or distrusting.
You might need to realign your life with these updated values. And in
many cases, this value realignment is part of the healing process itself.
47
Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2006). The Foundations of Posttraumatic Growth: An Expanded
Framework. Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth. Routledge.
Deep down, they will come to resent that value, because they will feel
as though it is violating their autonomy. The pre-eminent theory on
motivation, Self-Determination Theory, finds that people only internalize
values if they feel autonomy and understand the importance. For
instance, one might start recycling to avoid a fine (an external
motivator), but gradually adopt environmentalism as a personal
value—after becoming accustomed to the behavior and witnessing its
positive impact.
48
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new
directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
just because my company requires it, I might not take it as my value. But
if I volunteer on my own accord or with a gentle nudge, I may start
valuing altruism more, because I see myself doing it freely.
But ultimately, external influences can only create the opportunity for
value-change through new behaviors. It’s only once we’ve experienced
the new value, rationalized it and been emotionally rewarded for it, that
we truly internalize it and have felt ourselves grow or change.
If you want to change your own values or someone else’s, this suggests
gentle persuasion works better than brute force. Engaging someone’s
sense of choice and reason—giving small challenges that encourage
them to embrace a value—is more effective than large bribes or threats
For your own self, if you want to adopt a new value—say you want to
value health more—you might start with small self-challenges that are
meaningful (e.g., run a 5K charity race) rather than extreme overhauls
that you resent. That way, you build positive associations and intrinsic
reasons for the value.
Our culture is a sea of values that we grow up swimming in. And in many
cases, it’s only by leaving our culture that we’re able to examine it with
any objectivity.
But the Sirens weren’t just beautiful voices. They were voices that
spoke exactly to your ego, your fantasies, your deepest desires. They
didn’t just sing—they knew you. And every man who ever heard their
song would steer straight into the rocks. That’s what makes them
dangerous. They didn’t kill you—they made you kill yourself.
Odysseus knew this. He knew he was smart. He knew he was brave. But
he also knew that none of that would matter. When the world seduces
you with what you want to hear, you become powerless.
And the moment came. He heard the song. He lost his mind. He begged
to be let loose. But he couldn’t move. Because past-him didn’t trust
future-him. And that’s the point.
The world will try to seduce you with promises and stories and riches
that don’t align with who you actually are. You will be tempted to give
yourself up, to give your values up, to destroy yourself among the rocky
shores of life, to get these quick rewards. And this is the way of
self-destruction.
Therefore, like Odysseus, many times the smartest thing you can do is
tie yourself to the mast of your own values before the music starts.
1. Self-awareness
2. Emotional regulation
3. Strong relationships and
4. Non-judgmental acceptance
If you’d like to work through these lessons using simple daily action
steps and exercises alongside a supportive community, check out
Momentum. Inside you’ll find a non-judgmental space to share your
takeaways on values —and on living by them—with like-minded
people. I think you’ll love it.
It’s very much like the earlier idea of cognitive dissonance: you bring to
awareness the discrepancy between value and action, which then
motivates you to resolve it.
49
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and
Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115–128.
1-10, how much did my actions today align with this value?” If low, what
specific actions can you take tomorrow to improve? This can help foster
both awareness and a plan.
And finally, find someone in your life who can (and will) call you on your
BS. It’s hard to find, but if there is a trusted friend, family member, or
therapist you can go to and ask for their perspective on your behavior,
you might be surprised at the gap between how other people see your
behavior and how you see yourself.
50
Klussman K, Curtin N, Langer J, Nichols AL. The Importance of Awareness, Acceptance, and
Alignment With the Self: A Framework for Understanding Self-Connection. Eur J Psychol. 2022 Feb
25;18(1):120-131.
Psychologist Albert Ellis used to say, between an event and our reaction
is our interpretation, which we can control.51 We can apply that: If
someone insults you and your immediate emotion is rage, practical
wisdom would have you pause (self-awareness: “I am very angry now”)
and recall your values (“I value dignity and I don’t want to escalate to
cruelty”) before responding. Techniques like deep breathing, or
excusing yourself for a moment can help in these heated times. By
calming the physiological storm, you give your value-driven mind a
chance to step back in.
51
Ellis, A. The revised ABC's of rational-emotive therapy (RET). J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther
9, 139–172 (1991).
quickly reduces harsh emotions and allows you to act more in line with
values of understanding or patience.
The discomfort itself isn’t the real problem; it’s our refusal to accept it
that is the problem. If we can accept that living by our values often
demands discomfort, we are far better prepared to uphold them in the
moments that matter.
52
Bayly, B., & Bumpus, M. F. (2020). Predictors and implications of values clarity in first-year college
students. College student journal, 53(4), 397–404.
● Moral and Values Feedback: Trusted friends and family can serve
as sounding boards for moral dilemmas.55 By discussing conflicts
or uncertainties with someone you respect, you can see your
choices from fresh angles. These honest conversations help
53
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as
a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
54
Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Co-regulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative
analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167.
55
Friedman, R. (2002). Developing partnership promotes peace: group psychotherapy experiences.
Croatian medical journal, 43 2, 141-7 .
This is all great. But there’s a catch: you need to have relationships with
people who are aligned with your values. And those relationships must
be healthy, loving and supportive.
How to seek out, find and foster healthy, loving relationships is beyond
the scope of this guide (future episode!)
But relationships with people who share your values are crucial to
developing and maintaining the wisdom to manage your own. As the
saying goes, no man is an island. Find people who challenge and
encourage you, then they can become powerful catalysts for living a
richer, more consistent, and more enlightened life.
56
Peteet, J. R., Witvliet, C. V. O., & Evans, C. S. (2022). Accountability as a key virtue in mental health
and human flourishing. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(1), 49–60.
While you may feel disappointment or sadness, you refuse to spiral into
narratives of judgment or condemnation. You don’t tell yourself you’re a
loser, that you have no willpower, or that you can’t achieve anything you
set your mind to. These stories are self-defeating. Instead, practice
self-compassion. Tell yourself: “I’m human and I slipped. What can I
learn? How can I support myself to do better tomorrow?”
57
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
58
K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Theory, research, and
practice. The Guilford Press.
mindset rather than one of pure blame. It aligns with the concept of
“hate the sin, not the sinner”—you focus on actions and consequences,
not condemning the person’s entire worth as an individual.
But ultimately, the only way to really live out your values is by living
them out publicly for all the world to see—and then accepting the
consequences.
In this sense, the antithesis of living out your values is living out
everyone else’s values. It is giving in to the social pressures and cultural
definitions of what’s good. And it’s giving up your autonomy and
responsibility.
You might notice this sounds like building character—indeed it is. This is
exactly how Aristotle saw it. You build your inner character the same
way you build anything—one piece at a time. Some days you’ll succeed.
Some days you won’t. But each scenario, good or bad, is an opportunity
for further practical wisdom.
Conclusion
The 80/20 of Values
There is a lot in this guide to digest. But through all of the theory and
philosophy, here are the most important takeaways:
● More Motivation and Drive: Values give you a powerful why. They
ignite your internal motivation and help you stick to your goals,
making it more likely that you’ll achieve outcomes that truly
satisfy you.
Clarify Your Values & Build Your Best Life Around Them
Imagine it’s a Wednesday, and you’re just wrapping up work for the
day.
These are all things you value, yet you only have time and energy
for so much. You decide to be kind to yourself—thankfully you’ve
worked on that with your therapist enough to be good at it now.
But now what? You’ve read this guide and you have all the
knowledge on values.
How can you get more intentional and use all you’ve learned to
better handle the real-life conflicts you’ll find yourself in?
Inside, you’ll get exactly what you need to clarify and reorganize
your values and develop practical wisdom so you can live by
them, in a values-supportive environment to help you stay the
course.
This truly is the foundation for a fulfilling & deeply meaningful life.