DATS V2 Measurement and Accuracy
DATS V2 Measurement and Accuracy
There seems to be a bit of confusion in some DIY speaker circles about what signal level is
appropriate for measuring small-signal parameters, so let’s look at this question more closely. In his
groundbreaking paper titled “Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes,” Neville Thiele1 discusses the test signal
level and states:
“The value is not of great importance, but a standard test figure is 1 volt.”
So there is no reason to measure Thiele/Small parameters at any particular level, as long as the
measurement is not contaminated with noise and is well below the large-signal threshold. DATS
allows the user to set the level of the test signal sweep anywhere in the range from +5 dBu (2 volts
peak) to -10 dBu (0.35 V peak) within the software. This constitutes the small-signal range for the
vast majority of speakers, but note that some micro-speakers could be pushed into the non-linear
region at DATS maximum output level.
The objection is heard occasionally that fS can change with drive level, so it would seem that the
parameters should be measured at higher power levels. It is easy to demonstrate—in the case of well-
designed transducers that are operating normally (i.e., not damaged)—that the fS of a driver does not
change significantly over a very wide range of operation. In fact, a shifting in fS at high drive levels
would indicate the onset of nonlinearity and would not constitute a valid small-signal measurement.
At the other extreme, a shift in fS at low drive levels is an indication that a driver has mechanical
obstructions such as debris in the magnetic gap. This behavior is the basis for the DATS rub and buzz
test. For example, Figure 2 shows the impedance of a transducer (Dayton Audio RS-100) measured at
eight different drive levels over a 70 dB range in 10 dB steps. At the lowest drive levels, the
resonance vanishes into the noise but the shape (Q) and center frequency (fS) remain unchanged over
the 70 dB range of measurement signal level. This is typical behavior for a good driver.
Figure 2: Impedance Response at Progressively Lower Signal Levels for a Properly Functioning Loudspeaker.
In comparison, Figure 3 shows the same test repeated on a different driver with a rubbing voice coil.
Figure 3: Impedance Response at Progressively Lower Signal Levels for a Defective Loudspeaker.
Figure 4: Mean measurement error for ten trials at each impedance for each unit.
The six test units performed with accuracy better than +/-1%, except at 1 Ohm, where the highest
percentage error was -2.179% for unit A. This may sound high until you realize that the actual error
never exceeded 0.025 Ohms. The accuracy specification for these six units (calibrated to +/-
0.1% at 1k Ohms) would be +/- 0.5% or .025 Ohms, whichever is greater. When calibrated with a
1% resistor the accuracy specification would be degraded to +/- 1.5% or .035 Ohms, whichever is
greater. Similar testing on capacitors and inductors reveals this same high level of accuracy. Out of
the box and uncalibrated, it is normal for DATS units to exhibit a basic accuracy of around +/-5%.
References:
[1] A. N. Thiele, “Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes: Part I and II, Loudspeaker Anthology, vol. 1
(Audio Eng. Society, New York, 1978).
[2] R.H. Small, “Vented-Box Loudspeaker Systems, Part I: Small-Signal Analysis, “J. Audio Eng.
Soc., vol. 21, (June 1973).
[3] Joseph D’Appolito, “Testing Loudspeakers”, published by Audio Amateur Press, 1998.
Appendix A: Unit A Evaluation Results
Appendix B: Unit B Evaluation Results
Appendix C: Unit C Evaluation Results
Appendix D: Unit D Evaluation Results
Appendix E: Unit E Evaluation Results
Appendix F: Unit F Evaluation Results
Revised: 26Nov13