Ilide - Info Design of Girder Type Bridge PR
Ilide - Info Design of Girder Type Bridge PR
1.8m
5.7 5.7
3.1 m
1.8m
As per Cl. 22.2 (b) (1) of IS 456 : 2000 the efeective Span of the Slab = Clear Span
Clear span = 2.650 m
Dispersion along span
x= 0.650 m
L'/L = 3.667 Hence K = 2.6
BRIDGE AT 11.675 KM of WAB CANAL
5.100
220 m
4.25
220 m
300 m
1 3.100 1
m
[As per Cl. 110.1.3, IRC:5-1998] Normal Scour Depth from water level
l Supply Depth FSD = 2.373 m
The Top of Pile Cap or the Bottom of Pier Kept 0.45 M below Bed
00 m
40 m
28 m
75 m [As per MORTH Standard]
00 m [As per Table 12.1 of IRC-SP 13-2004]
19 m
19 m
19 m
5 mm
5 mm
0.563 t/sqm
5 mm
0.165 t/sqm
0.728 t/sqm
2.650 m
Dispersion of the Load across the span = 1.68 m
Dispersion of the Load along the span = 1.1 m < 1.8 m m hence no overlap.
Actual width of dispersion along span 0.975 m
1.80
3.
4
0.975 m 8
9 0.20
2.65 m
T
Impact Factor 4.5/(6+L) = 0.259 b
= w
DLBM = = 0.639 t-m/m s s Fixed End Moments WS/12L*(3L^2-3(b+S)^2 - S^2)
L
0.225
L = 2.65
S = 0.975
b = 0.7
W = 3.402
FEM = 1.220
LLBM 500= kg/sqm 0.438 Tm/m
DLBM = = 0.511 Tm/m 80% considering fixity
LLBM including Impact 0.175
= 0.175
0.552 tm/m
LL @ 500 Kg /sqm in rest part of deck beyond 2.3 m as per 204.3 of IRC 6 : 2014
2.3
( But in above Condition it is not coming into the picture )
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB-at Central Span
Moment along Shorter Direction due to Dead Load = 0.511 T-m
Moment along Shorter Direction due to Live Load = 0.438 T-m
Impact Factor = 0.259
Moment along Shorter Direction,M = 1.062 T-m
Grade of Concrete = M35
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe-500
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Diameter of Reinforcement = 16 mm
s
cbc = 11.670 N/mm2
s
st = 240 N/mm2
Modulur ratio,m=280/3scbc = 8.00
K = scbc/(scbc+sst/m) = 0.280
J,lever arm factor = 0.907
R,resisting Moment Factor = 1.481 N/mm2
Effective Depth required = 84.691 mm
Over all Depth required = 132.691 mm
Effective Depth calculated = 177 mm
Calculation of Reinforcement(Primary Bar)
Area of Steel Required,M/(j x d x sst) = mm2
275.860
5.7t
1m
0.075 m W.C.
0.225
0.225 0. 425 0.225
0.50m
0.775m
0.225
0.775
1m
m hence no overlap.
WS/12L*(3L^2-3(b+S)^2 - S^2)
0.225
0.075m
m W.C.
= 0.739
= 1.421
= 0.653 tm/m
= 0.325 m
0.2 m
0.225m
0.425
0.775
1m
0.45
s
cbc sst =
Modulur ratio,m=280/3scbc =
=
K = scbc/(scbc+sst/m) =
J,lever arm factor R,resisting Moment Factor Effective depth required effective depth =
provided =
Reinforcement requrid = =
16 mm Rod =
12 mm Rod Steel Provided = =
Percentage of steel = =
Check For Shear =
Shear Force due to Dead Load Shear Force due to Live Load Total Shear = =
Shear Stress = permissible shear stress ( Table 23 of IS 456 ) =
=
=
=
=
=
DESIGN OF GIRDER
Over all Depth of Girder provided =
Clear Cover =
Centroid Dist. of Reinforcement Layer from Bottom of Web ( considering 25 mm rod =
and spacer =
Effective Depth of the T-girder
225 mm
1.10 m
Fe-500
hence O.K.
(1.1-0.1145)
Effective span of the Girder will be least of the following:
(0.9855) = 11.754 m Reference Clause 305.4.2-IRC:21
Clear span + Effective Depth of girder
Bearing to Bearing Distance along Girder = 11.669 m
Hence the Effective Length of the Girder, Le = 11.669 m
Calculation For Dead Load Bending Moment and S.F. = 0.2 sqm
Sectional area of the Deck and Girder . Railing
Kerb = 0.045
Cantilever Slab = 0.252
Slab = 0.298
Haunch = 0.000
Girder = 0.495
Total Weight = 1.290
Weight from W.C. = 3.225 t/m
Dead Load Carried by the Girder per M = 0.367 t/m
DL BM DLSF = 3.592 t.m
LIVE LOAD ANALYSIS = 61.132 t-m
Class A Single Lane Train of Vehicles that can be accomodated = 20.956 t
11.40t
2.70 2.70 t 11.40t 6.80 t 6.80 t 6.80 t 6.8 t
1.1m 3.20 m 1.20m 4.30 m 3.0m 3.0 m 3.0 m
11.669 m
Since the span is 11.669 m effective and since the absolutely maximum BM occurs near the center of the Girder we find that the loads 2.7t,2.7t, 11.4t, 11.4t and 6.8 t alone will be on the
Reaction Factor
W = half of axle load 1.80 m
W W
Ra = W+W*1.3/1.8
3.1/1.8 W 1.722W
Rb = 0.278W
A B
3.10m
Hence actual loads on Girder A = 2.3247 t from 2.7 t 9.8154 t from 11.4 t
5.8548 t from 6.8 t
CG of the actual load system and RHS heavier Load are arranged equidistant to causes maximum moment in the Girder below the maximum load on the right. - one consideration
To find the CG of the above five loads x from 5.855 t load
2.325 t 2.325 9.816 9.816 5.855
1.100 m
0.040 m
0.115 m
0.986 m
Fe-500
hence O.K.
(1.1-0.1145)
11.754 m Reference Clause 305.4.2-IRC:21
11.669 m
11.669 m
0.2 sqm
0.045
0.252
0.298
0.000
0.495
1.290
3.225 t/m
0.367 t/m
3.592 t.m
61.132 t-m
20.956 t
irder we find that the loads 2.7t,2.7t, 11.4t, 11.4t and 6.8 t alone will be on the
11.4 t
ment in the Girder below the maximum load on the right. - one consideration
4.3 m
0.319 m
0.160 m
A 9.816 t 9.816 t 5.855 t
Rb = 14.659 t
Ra 1.10 m 3.20 m 4.30 m = 15.478 t
LLBM center of girder = 57.943 tm
0.49 m 1.2 m 1.37
B CASE -1
11.669 m CASE - II
Placing the center of Two Heavier Loads equidistant from center of Girder.
2.33 t 9.816 t 9.816 t 5.855 t
0.934
0.934 m
B
A
Rb = 15.794 t
Moment at point below the heaviest load on RHS = = 57.493 t-m
Hence Case -I Prevails.
Impact Factor = = 0.255
ds
n
Taking Moments of the areas about the Neutral Axis NA below flange
beff .n2/2 +(1.5m-1)Asc.(n-40) = mAst.(d-n)
b
eff = 1617 mm
m = 8
A
sc = 1571
mm2
A
st = 7363
mm2
deff =d = 986 mm
ds = 225 mm
bw = 450 mm
say n = 226.450 mm
LHS = 44676761
RHS = 44698965
Equating we get the value of Neutral axis,n = 226.500 mm > 225 mm
2.325 3.2 m 1.2 m 4.3 m
center of Girder
11.669 m
5.855 t
14.659 t
15.478 t
57.943 tm
1.37
5.855 t
B
A
57.493 t-m
0.255
72.700 tm
5.855 t
3. m
0.169m
23.392 t
29.350 t B
133.832 T-m
50.306 T
M35
Fe500
40 mm Ref Cl 304.3.1-IRC-21:2000
1.100 m
11.669 m
0.225 m
0.450 m
0.875 m
1.617 m
3.100 m
1.617 m
986 mm
2454 mm2
7363 mm2
1571 mm2 Distance from Top compression Flange to Neutral Axis assumed "n"
beff
NA below flange
1617 mm
8
1571
mm2 bw
7363
mm2
986 mm
225 mm
450 mm
226.450 mm
44676761
44698965
226.500 mm > 225 mm
4.3 m
Trial For Case-II,Wherein Neutral axis below Flange
beff .ds.(n-ds/2)+bw.(n-ds)^2/2+(1.5m-1)Asc.(n-40) = m . Ast . (d-n)
n = 226.500
Equating we get the value of Neutral axis,n = 226.500 < than
Calculated NA is less than Critical NA hence the Section is Under Reinforced.
Calculated NA is less than Critical NA hence the Section is Under Reinforced.
Hence,
Tensile Stress at Steel (t) = 240.00
N/mm2
Comp. stress at top fiber of Concrete
c = 8.955 N/mm2
c' = c 6.405 N/mm2
scbc
c" = 64.5 mm c' 0.059 N/mm2
226.5 mm 22 5mm
985.5 mm c"
Average stress acting on the Concrete in Deck Slab = (c+c')/2 =
4.507 N/mm
759.0 mm
2
X
ds
Sv = = 386.237 mm
Spacing Provided 200 C/C 1.80
Hence 4 legged 12 mm dia rod 200 C/C to 300 C/C
CROSS GIRDER
Assumed A 3.10 B
D = 400 mm
B = 300 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Dia of Main rod = 16 mm
Stirrups = 8 mm
effective Depth = 344 mm
Scbc =
11.670 N/mm2
Sst =
240 N/mm2
m = 8
k = 0.280 mm
kd = 96.320 mm
j = 0.907 mm
R =
1.481 N/mm2
Dead Load = 0.3 t/m
DLBM = 0.360 t-m
DLSF = 0.465 t
Live Load Analysis
Wheels of the heaviest loads 11.4 /2 t are kept on it.
Ra = 5.7 t
LL Mumax = 3.705 tm
LLmax including Impact = 4.665 t-m
LL SF including impact = 7.177 t
Total Moment = 5.025 t -m
Total SF = 7.642 t
Though it will behave as an L beam and more strength than a Rectangular Beam but we check its efficiency as a Rectangular Beam.
Required effective depth = 336.277
Overall Depth required = 392.277 < than 400 mm , O.K.
Effective depth provided = 344 mm > than 336.277 mm , O.K.
Requirement of Steel for Tension =
671.342 mm 2
mm the critical NA
Line of CG
n
NA
ment of Resistance of the Balanced Section of T- Beam in Flange Part =
0.000 Negligible
Lever Arm
O.K.
an 400 mm , O.K.
than 336.277 mm , O.K.
Steel provided = 803.840 mm2 > than
% of Steel Provided = 0.779
Shear Stress developed = 0.740 N/mm2
Permissible Shear stress = 0.370 N/mm2
( IRC 21 : 2000 Table 12B ) =
Residual Shear Force Vs = 3.823 t
Shear Reinforcement to provide Aw
Aw Vs*s/(Sst*d) = 92.621 mm2
Providing 2 legged 8 mm dia rod at 200 C/C Area of steel = 100.480 < than 92.62
Suggested 8 mm dia rod at 150 to 200 C/C
671.342 O.K.
O.K.
DESIGN OF PIER for Bridge at 11.675 Km of WAB I
DESIGN OF SUBSTRUCTURE
Canal Bed Level = 141.146 m
FSL = 143.519 m
Bearing Thickness = 0.024 m
Bearign Plate dimension Along T-Girder = 400 mm
Bearign Plate dimension Across T-Girder = 450 mm
Free Board = 0.900 m
Level of Top of Pier = 144.395 m
Depth of Pile Cap Top of Pier from Canal Bed = 450 mm
RL of Top of Pile Cap = 140.696 m
Height of Pier = 3699 mm
Thickness of Pier = 1220 mm
Width of Pier beneath Super Structure = = 3550 mm
Extension of Pier straight,
450 beyond Super Structure = 300 mm
Extension of Pier SemiCirculur beyond Super Structure = 610 mm
Width of Pier extended beyond Super Structure = 910 mm
Total Length of Pier T-Girder = 5370 mm
20
100
400
300
T-Girder T-Girder
Plate Bearing
300
Pier
450
Load Analysis
DEAD LOAD
DLSF of Girder =
83.824 t
2.7t 2.7t 20 mm
11.4 1.1m t 11.4t 6.8t 6.8t
2.58 0.58
CASE -1
11.369m
CASE -2
Detail of Pier with Support Details in ELEVATION
Case -2
Load on Pier from Right Load on Pier from left Total = 14.992 t
Load = 15.019 t
Live Load Impact Factor = 30.011 t
= 0.259 t
4.5/(6+L) =
Total Live Load in Case -2 considering Impact = 37.786 t
=
Unmbalanced Load about Minor Axis ( Perpendicular to Flow ) of Pier = 0.027 t
Case - 1
Load on Pier from Right side = 26.823 t
Load on Pier from Left side = 3.913 t
6.8t
2.869m
0.489m
14.992 t
15.019 t
30.011 t
0.259 t
37.786 t
0.027 t
26.823 t
3.913 t
=
Unbalanced Load =
22.910 t
=
Distance of Point of application of Load from center of Pier = =
0.300 m
Moment acting on Pier due to Un-Balanced Live Load =
8.654 T-m 0.20
0.10 0.02
C.L. of Plate Bearings
1.22
S/W of Pier
Dead Load for Self-Weight of Pier = 57.625t ((3.55+2*0.3)*1.22 +
Longitudinal Force Calculation: 0.785*1.22^2)*3.699*2.5
Braking Force (20% of LL on Span = 7.280t acting 1.2 m above Deck Moment will be =
17.290 tm
lever arm = 1.2 + W.C. thickness + Depth of Girder
Vertical Load transferred to Bearing Level due to the Couple =
1.521 t =
FRICTIONAL FORCE
Co-efficient of Friction, µ = 0.4 (IRC 6:2010, CL. 211.5.1.)
As per Cl. 211.5.1.2, the span becoming less t
Cl. 211.5.1 of IRC ^-2010
greater of,
Frictional Resistance offered to the movement of Free Bearings due to change of Temparature or anyother case.
Hence the Applied horizontal load
9.164 t
Water Current Force:
As per IRC 6 : 2010, CL. 210.2,
The Intensity of Pressure, P =
52KV2
The bed is erodible and hence triangular distribution of square of velocity shall be applicable. But from point of becoming on safer side the distribution is being considered rectangular i.e. same velocity all through and distribution of press
intensity due to water current also rectangular.
2.373 m
141.146 m (CBL)
292.425
kg/m2
Total Force on Pier along the flow 846.589 kg
292.425x2.37x0.61
Point of Application from Bed Level 1.187 m
2.373/2
With an angle of 20° with axis of flow-
Velocity component perpendicular to flow V Sin α
Maximum Velocity = 0.995 m/s
Water current pressure intensity 34 kg/Sqm
143.519 m (FSL)
2.373 m 250 mm
Wind Force:
Considering No Water Condition-
11.969 m
85*1.22^2)*3.699*2.5
Moment will be =
17.290 tm
1.)
1.225 m
C/S of Deck Structure
WL on Superstructure-
Total Length of a Sinlge span end to end 11.969 m
Height above bearing including parapet 2.325 m
Area of superstructure subject to WL ( neglecting Perforation) 27.828 sqm
Due to this Horizontal Force there will be a Push Pull Effect to cause Pressure and equal amount of Tension in Pier
The quantum of this force will be = C.G. of Force *Distance from Bearing / center to center distance of girders
Hence te quantum of Push & Pull = 943.5 kg in each pier.
WL on LL Component-
As per previous, tranverse WL, FT P z x AT x G x CD
Gust Factor, G 2
Drag co-efficient, C 1.2 (As per Clause 209.3.6, IRC:6-2010)
D
Transverse wind force acting at Bearing Level
X-X 3696 kg 463.7x33.214x2x1.2)/10
Point of Application from Top of Pile Cap 3.699 m
-++m+0+1.5
Longitudinal wind force acting at Bearing Level 924 kg working 1.5 m from road level
Point of Application from Top of Pile Cap 3.699 m
d= 4.15 m
Ratio of length & width, d/b = 3.402 < 4
Ratio of height & width, h/b = 2.663
Therefore, drag co-efficient, C = 0.8 (As per Table 5, IRC:6-2010)
D
But as per Notes under Table 5, in case of Rectangular Pier with rounded corners above value of Cd shall be multiplied by
factor, greater of (1-1.5r/b) = 0.250 1-(1.5X(1.22/2)/1.22) & 0.500
Therefore, revised darg co-efficient, CD = 0.400 Max of (0.25 & 0.5) x 0.8
Hence, Wind force acting on pier = 147 kg 463.7x(3.249x1.22)x2x0.4)/10
Point of Application from Top of Pile Cap = 1.625 m 3.249/2
5.10
0.45 0.45
3.699 m
road level
144.395 m
(PIER TOP)
(CBL)
144.395 m
(PIER TOP)
(FSL)
.250
.500
.400
40 kg
3.261 m
0
N/m2
.75 (As per Clause 209.3.5, IRC:6-2010)
42 sqm 0x11.969
246 kg 463.7x2x0.75x61.042/10
Summary Table for Forces:- Y
X X
Flow Y Longitudinal to Bridge Axis to cause Moment about X-X
Permissible Bending Compressive stress in concrete, scbc Permissible Bending = 11.670 Mpa
Compressive = 240 Mpa
stress in steel, sst
16 Ø 200 C/C
X
4150
Y
610
f Cl 26.5.3.1.b-IS-456
11696.3 mm 2
RC:21
000]
Area of Reinforcement Provided , Asc = 11696 mm 2
Ae, (Ac+1.5xmAsc) = 6371710 mm 2
Equivalent Moment of Inertia about X-X,IeX-X = 736725747588 mm 4 Ignoring the MI of steel
C = 351 mm
Equivalent Moment of Inertia about Y-Y = 13661124347958
mm4
0.95
1
Y(-) 3.6
5
Y(+)
2
3.6
3.6
3
0.95
X(+)
0.95 3.600
5.500
X(-)
Vertical Load acting on Pier = 175.2 T Refrence Table-II
Moment about X-X = 49.5 T-m Refrence Table-II
Moment about Y-Y = 33.4 T-m Refrence Table-II
Horizontal Load = 13.1 T Refrence Table-II
Maximum Hor. Force
LOAD ON INDIVIDUAL PILE IN A PILE GROUP
Qm = Q/n (+/-) MyX/sigma X 2 ( + /-) MxY/signma Y2
175.2X10^4/(6691715.935)
9.55X10^7/736725747588
3.42X10^7/13661124347958
-4.1 , IS 456 :2000
ence O.K.
hence O.K.
S 456: 2000, Cl B-4.1
0.95
Maximum Hor. Force
Mx, My = Moment w.r.t. X and Y axes respectively.
x,y = distance of pile from Y & X respectively X
For P1, P3,P4,P6 3.6
P2 & P5 0
Load from Pier acting on,P1 = 37.966 T
Load from Pier acting on,P2 = 33.789 T P1,P2 &P3 Mx +
Load from Pier acting on,P3 = 31.468 T P4,P5 & P6 Mx -
Load from Pier acting on,P4 = 26.934 T P1&P4 My +
Load from Pier acting on,P5 = 24.613 T P2 & P5 My = 0
Load from Pier acting on,P6 = 23.066 T P3 & P6 My -
st
Punching Area
1.200 mm dia
A
c (1-0.4/100)x1130973
= 1126449 mm2
A
sc 0.4/100x1130973
= 4523.893 mm2
Permissible Axial Load of Pier, = 1094.217 T (8.75x1126449.5+240x4523.9)/10^4
Reference Clause B.3.1,IRC-21 > OK
Axial Load acting on Pile = 75.504 T
Hence it is Safe in Axial Compression
Vertical Bar provided 16 nos 20 tor = 5027 mm2 SAFE
Stirrup Provided 8 Tor 150mm C/C
Y
1.8
1.8
ge-Sheet-20
8-2000]
OK
Hence SAFE
12.6- IS-2911
7.998)
28/3)
1.481x1200)
1712.5x240)
73
07.2.5.5,IRC-21
40x4523.9)/10^4
16 NOS 20mm DIA TOR
Tie 8mm Tor 150mm C/C
Lateral Load Capacity Calculation of Pier Pile
Grade of Concrete = M-35 MPA
I,(Π/4xD4) = 0.102 m 4
Length above Scour Level,L1 = 0
Embedement Length below Scour,Le = 19.204
Overburden material Type = NC (Ref From Soil Report,Page-Sheet no-A25)
N = 9 (Ref From Soil Report,Page-Sheet no-A25)
Modulas of Subgrade Reaction =
1200 kN/m3 Refer Table 3 Annex C of IS 2911
Fixed End Moment,Mf = 11.450 T-m Mf=((𝑒+𝑍𝑓))/2 (For Fixed Head Piles)
Vertical Load acts on Pile = 75.504 T (e=0,Zf=Lf)
Mu = 17.175 T-m 1.5*11.45
Pu = 113.256 T 1.5*75.504
Pu/fckD2 = 0.022
Mu/fckD3 = 0.003
p/fck = 0.010
p = 0.35 %
Ast = 3958 mm2
Dia = 20
Nos = 12.600
Provided Reinforcement 16 Nos 20 mm Dia OK
Thickness of Abutment = 1.220 m
Thickness of Approach Slab = 0.225 m
Height of Dirt Wall = 0.899 m
Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.300 m
Length of Pile Cap along Y-Y = 5500 m
Length of Pile Cap along X-X = 9100 m
Thickness of Pile Cap = 1.800 m
Top of Pile Cap, below Bed = 0.450 m
= m
= m
Approach Slab L = 3500 mm Bottom of Girder = 144.443 m
Thickness = 0.225 Top of Girder = 145.543 m
of Wall 3.699 0.90 Bearing thickness= 0.024m FSL = 143.519m
10.769m
Pier = 1.22m CBL =
1.22 141.146m
950
140.696 m 140.696 m
3600 Abutmt 0.3m 0.0
Ht. 1.22m thick
Length of the Girder from end to end = 1190
Pile Dia = 1200mm
Gap between Wall & end of Girder =0.02
3600
9100mm
Overhang of Girder = 0.1m
950 1.22m
Width of Bearing = 0.4m
950mm Distance of C/L of Bearing from end of Wall = 0.62 m
5500 Distance of C/L of Bearing from C/L of Abutt =
X Projection of Girderbeyond C/L of Bearing =
Details of Abutment Top
Load Calculation
Vertical force due to Dead Load from Super Structure
Length of the girder Transferring load to Abutment = 6.134m
Load being transferred to Abutment from 2 Girders W1 = 44.067t
Horizontal distance of the line of action of this force from C/L of Abutment Self Load of Bearing = 0.010m
0.45X0.4X0.024X7.85*2 W2 = 0.067m acting 0.01m away from C/L of Abutment.
=
16 NOS 20mm DIA TOR
Tie 8mm Tor 150mm C/C
Dia OK
C/L of Abutment
0.3m 0.0 C/L of Bearing
f Bearing = 0.4m
0.62 m
0.01m
0.3m
WIND FORCE
Wind Force from Live Load and Superstructure are not being considered on Abutment parallel to the flow direction
as there though that will cause bending of Abutment about its Transverse Axis but that will be resisted by Passive
H3 CBL
0
Pressure due to Live Load Surcharge Active EP .
4
Horizontal Force Due to Live Load Surcharge 5
Bulk unit weight of Compacted Back Filled Soil = 2.00 t/m 3
Angle of Repose,φ(Considered) = 30 o
= 0.524 rad
Active Earth pressure co-efficient, K a = 0.333 o
Horizontal Pressure Intensity due to Surcharge = 0.799 t/m2
Horizontal Force due to Live Load Surcharge per running meter Length of Abutment = 3.674 T
= 9.10 m
1m
1 t/m2
any in undrained condition)
1m
(Pressure due to GWT if
Summary of Forces acting on Abutment(Reference as Earlier)
b Factor W3
ve deck This braking force is acting 1.2 m above the wearing course level,
= 102.666 T
= 0.899 m
= 0.300 m
9.100 m
2t/m3
0.333
0.80 t/m2
1.931 m
00 t/m 3
30 o
0.524 rad
0.333 o
0.799 t/m2
3.674 T
9.10 m
33.43 T
2.299 m
0.333
3.065 t/Sqm
7.047 t
9.10 m
64.13 t
1.931 m
3.000
2.700 t/sqm
0.608 t/m
9.10 m
5.528 T
0.150 m
0.000 t/m
9.10 m
4.55 t
0.333 m
Forces Vertical Eccentricity Moment
Load(T) (meter) (T-m)
W1 44.067 0.010 0.441
W2 0.067 0.010 0.001
W3 33.773 0.010 0.338
W4 1.521 0.010 0.015
W5 108.801 0.000 0.000
Horizontal Load Height of Line action from Moment (T-m)
(T) above the
Base(m)
H1 28.356 3.699 104.889
H2 33.432 2.299 76.859
H3 64.130 1.931 123.834
H4 Opposite direction 5.528 0.150 0.829
H5 4.550 0.333 1.517
∑ 188.229 T ∑ 306.270 T-m
Design of Abutment
X
Design Input 1.220 m
Vertical Load,Fy = 188.229 T
Moment about,Mx-x = 306.270 T-m
Moment about,My-y = 0.000 T-m
Concrete Section Provided
Length of Abutment,b = 9.1 m
Thickness of Abutment,D = 1.220 m
Area of Section = 11102000 mm2
Y
Reinforcement Provided
At Compression Zone ( Canal Side ) Y
Dia provided = 20 mm
Spacing provided = 200 mm c/c
Asc = 14137 mm2
At Tension Zone ( Country Side)
Dia provided = 20 mm
Spacing provided Asc = 100 mm c/c X
Area of Reinforced Provided = 28274 mm2 < 12,Hence not Slender
Grade of Reinforcement Grade of Concrete = 42412 mm2 Fe500
Clear cover Modulur Ratio Height = M35
Slenderness about X-X = 50 mm
= 8.00
= 4.598m
= 3.769
=
Eccentricity e = = 1627 mm
D= = 1220.0 mm D/2 n
D/4 < e < 3*D/2 D
Hence it is a case of compressive force at moderate intensity. Referring to the stress diagram, let's consider c' is the compressive stress in concrete.
Then from the above stress diagram it is clear that
the compressive stress at steel , tc = m *c'/n*(n- dc) =1.5m*c'/n*(n-dc)
c Eqn --(1) D/2
Tensile stress at steel t= m*c'/n*(D -dt -n) dt dc = dt = 60
Ast
As the section is balanced , there can not be unresolved force , hence the algebraic summation of Internal Compressive force and Tensile shall be equal to the external force P
n
d
Hence, = P
b*n*c'/2 + (mc - 1)*Asc* c'/n*(n-dc) - m*Ast*c'/n*(D-dt-n) = P ---- Eqn 3 =
Similarly the moments of all forces acting on the section must bal
Hence taking moments about the center of tensile streel, we get
bnc'/2*(D-dt-n/3) + ( mc - 1)*Asc*c'/n*(n-dc)*(D-dt-dc)
5.5 m = P*(e+ D/2 - dt) Eqn 4
Dividing Eqn 4 by Eqn 3,
D= 1220 mm
bn/2*(D- dt - n/3) + ( mc - 1)* Asc*1/n*(n-dc)*(D-dt-dc) = ( e + D/2 -dt ) Eqn 5 b= 9100 mm
bn/2 + (mc-1)*Asc*((n-dc)/n)- mAst*( (D-dt- n)/n) Asc = 14137 sqmm Ast = 28274 sqmm
solving for n by trial and error m=m
c = 8
n = 283.8mm
2.14 m
1.2 m
Hence to find value of c ' from equation 3 2.14 m
by trial and error c' = 2.79N/mm2 Compressive Stress in Concrete = 2.8 N/sqmm
Compressive stress in Steel = 26.4 N/sqmm Solving Eqn --(1)
Tensile stress in Steel = 68.9 N/Sqmm
All Stresses are O.K.
9.1 m X
X
Abutment
5.5 m
1.80 m P
i
l
e
1.1
End Girder
C/L of Abutment
0.3m .02 C/L of Bearing
ang
der =
0.1m
Backfil material
4.598 m
Overh of Gir
1.22m
2.14 2.14 m
2.250 m
13.5 t/sqm
m X 1.22m
2.8 t/sqm 5.5 m Width of Bearing = 0.4m
1 m standing water above slab Distance of C/L of Bearing from end of Wall = 0.62 m
Distance of C/L of Bearing from C/L of Abutt = 0.01m
Projection of Girderbeyond C/L of Bearing = 0.3m
Details of Abutment Top
2.8m
1.8
= P
= e'
e
Similarly the moments of all forces acting on the section must balance.
ments about the center of tensile streel, we get AL N
1220mm C
b= 9100 mm
Asc = 14137 sqmm Ast = 28274 sqmm
mm
X
Abutment
9.1*5.1*1.8*2.5
Length = 3.5m
Gap between Wall & end of Girder =0.02
C/L of Abutment
0.3m .02 C/L of Bearing
Overh of Gir
22m
Width of Bearing = 0.4m
istance of C/L of Bearing from end of Wall = 0.62 m
istance of C/L of Bearing from C/L of Abutt = 0.01m
rojection of Girderbeyond C/L of Bearing = 0.3m
etails of Abutment Top
8.088
.802 T-m
6.286 T-m
25 m
25 m from Point X
.423 T-m clock wise Moment
0.95 3.6 0.95
9.1
0.95
3.6
Y(-)
3.6
1.22
P3
(-)
0.95
P6
5.5
X
P4
P1
P5
P2
Load acting on Piles = 632.258 T
Vertical Load at bottom of Pile Cap Moment about X-X = 142.423 T-m
HorizontaL Load = 87.593 T
X(+)
Moment along X-X Grade of Concrete Grade of Reinforcement Clear Cover = 96.421 T-m
Dia of Reinforcement = M-35 T-m Fe-500
Effective Depth = 75 mm
= 25 mm
= 1712.500 mm
=
Reference clause 6.12.6- IS-2911
s
cbc = 11.67 1800-25/2-75
s
st = 240 N/mm2 Ref IRC 21:2000,Table 9
Modulur ratio,m=280/3scbc = 8.00 N/mm2 Ref IRC 21:2000,Table 10
k = scbc/(scbc+sst/m) = 0.280 Ref IRC 21:2000
j,Lever arm factor = 0.907 11.67/(11.67+240/8)
R = 1.482 1-0.28/3
Effective Depth required = 736 mm N/mm2 11.67/2X0.28X(1-0.28/3)
Total Depth required = 824 mm SQRT(25x10^7/(1.482x75000)
Provided Depth = 1800 mm 736.4+25/2+75
Effective Depth Provided = 1713 mm SAFE
1800-25/2-75
Area of Reinforcement Calculation
Reinforcement,Ast = 2587.6 96.421x10^7/(0.907x1712.5x240)
Dia provided (primary) = 25 mm
Spacing required = 190 mm
Provided Spacing = 150 mm C/C Top & Bottom Both Ways
erence clause 6.12.6- IS-2911
0-25/2-75
IRC 21:2000,Table 9
IRC 21:2000,Table 10
IRC 21:2000
67/(11.67+240/8)
28/3
67/2X0.28X(1-0.28/3)
RT(25x10^7/(1.482x75000)
.4+25/2+75
E
0-25/2-75
421x10^7/(0.907x1712.5x240)
118.564x10000/6455973
0.16xSQRT(35)
-Ref clause 307.2.5.5,IRC-21
1 m
7 m
1200 mm
1130973.36 mm2
mm2
MPa
240 MPa
m2 (1-0.4/100)x1130973.4
9 mm2 0.4/100x1130973.4
Reference Clause B.3.1,IRC-21
SAFE
eet no-A25)
eet no-A25)
ad Piles)
0,Z f=Lf)
*76.5
.5*118.20
m Dia OK
Design of Wing Wall
Basic Input:
F1=ka.sat.h2/2
W7
W2
4.948 W1
4.448 m W3
5.448 m W4
CBL
1.7 1.7
W6 0.575
1 0.275 0.275
X
W5
5.7 t/ m2
3.134 t/m2
3.450t/m2
Active earth pressure,F1 Live Load Surcharge,F2 Sliding = 9.399 T Seepage Pressure from back not considered as weep
Force,F1+F2 Moment due to F1 ( about Pt X ) Moment due to F2 = 4.140 T holes with backing by designed Filters are being
Overturning Moment About Point X = 13.363 T provided.
= 21.506 T-m
= 11.279 T-m
= 32.118 T-m
0.3
1.2 m
0.5
3.975 m Heel
Toe
1.900
T/m3
30
0.333 (1-Sinf)/(1+Sinf)
3.000
0.450
2.500 t/m3
2.28
T/m2
0.76 T/m2
F2
0.76
4,Hence ok
m
Toe
Heel
4.55 t/m2
12.447 t/m2
(1-0.5)x1.9=0.95
Stress at d away from Wall = 9.068 +((12.447-9.068)/1.7)Xd
t/m2
Design of Toe 0.95 t/m2 (4.448+(1-0.5))X 1.9
= 1.700 m
Cantilever Length of Toe
Bending Moment (9.068-0.95-0.5)X1.7X1.7/2+ 0.5X(12.447 - 9.068)X1.7X1.7X2/3 13.179 t-m/m
Basic Input
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe500
0.95 t/m2 9.40 t/m2
Grade of Concrete = M25
Clear cover = 75
Dia of Reinforcement d d = 16 mm
Permissible bending compreesive stress,scbc = 8.33 Mpa
Permissible stress,sst = 240 Mpa
Modular ratio, m(280/3scbc) 1.285 m 9.07 t/m2 7.925 t/m2 = 11.204
9.893
Constant for critical depth of N.A., k = 0.280
Lever arm factor, j = 0.91
Moment resistance factor, R = 1.057
N/mm2
Effective depth required,deff = 353 mm
Required overall depth,D = 436 mm
Provided Depth = 500 mm
Provided effective Depth = 415 mm
Required Steel = 1459
mm2
provide 16 tor = 100 mm C/C
Provided area of Reinforcement = 2011
mm2
Design for Shear(One way check )
Stress at d away from Wall = 9.893 t/m2
Shear force "d" distance away from Stem = 11.526 t
Shear stress = 0.278
N/mm2
Pt provioded = 0.484 %
Permissible shear stress = 0.310
N/mm2
Design of Heel
Cantilever Length of heel = 1.700 m
Bending Moment
Clock Wise BM = 15.391 t-m
Anti Clock Moment = 8.197 t-m
Net Clock wise moment to cause tension at top = 7.194 t-m
Basic Input
Grade of Reinforcement = Fe500
Grade of Concrete = M25
Clear cover = 50
Dia of Reinforcement = 12 mm
Permissible bending compreesive stress,scbc = 8.33 Mpa
Permissible stress,sst = 240 Mpa
Modular ratio, m = 11.204
Constant for critical depth of N.A., k = 0.280
Lever arm factor, j = 0.907
Moment resistance factor, R = 1.057
N/mm2
Effective depth required,deff = 260.844 mm
Required overall depth,D = 317 mm
Provided Depth = 500 mm
Provided effective Depth = 440 mm
Required Steel = 751.397
mm2
Provided Steel of 12 Tor = 100 mm C/C
Provided area of Reinforcement = 1131
mm2
t/m2
1.700 m
79 t-m/m
SQRT(0x10^7/(1.06x1000))
Hence OK
(0x10^7/(0.91x415x240))
OK
(9.068 +((12.447-9.068)/1.7)Xd)
Hence O.K.
Hence OK
OK
Design for Shear(One way check )
Shear force "d" distance away from Stem = 7.506 T
Shear stress = 0.188
N/mm2
Pt provioded = 0.257 %
Permissible shear stress = 0.230
N/mm2
Design of Stem
LL Surcharge 1.2 m Ht
0.76 t/m2
4.948 m
CBL
Passive earth pressure
1.5 m
Pt provioded = 0.61 %
Permissible shear stress = 0.31
N/mm2
*-(0*+0.5*(0-0)*)
Hence O.K.
CBL
Passive earth pressure
(1+4.448-0.5)
Ref Cl. 303.1 Table:9,IRC:21
Hence OK
OK