Realistic Court Observation Report – 40 Dates

Date: 01-01-2025
Stage: Cross-examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Defense counsel cross-examined prosecution witness, raising contradictions.

Learning:

Defense counsel cross-examined prosecution witness, raising contradictions. The

courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured
procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or
evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal
intricacies.

Date: 02-01-2025
Stage: Video Evidence Review

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence.

Learning:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 03-01-2025
Stage: Bail Hearing

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

Arguments were made for and against granting bail. The judge considered the offense's
gravity and the accused's flight risk.

Learning:

Arguments were made for and against granting bail. The judge considered the offense's
gravity and the accused's flight risk. The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the
supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal
opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case
forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 04-01-2025
Stage: Supply of Documents

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Court ensured accused received all prosecution documents.

Learning:

Court ensured accused received all prosecution documents. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 05-01-2025
Stage: Supply of Documents

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Court ensured accused received all prosecution documents.

Learning:

Court ensured accused received all prosecution documents. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 06-01-2025
Stage: In-camera Deposition

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions.

Learning:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 07-01-2025
Stage: Test Identification Parade Report

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

TIP report submitted. Witness identified accused.

Learning:

TIP report submitted. Witness identified accused. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 08-01-2025
Stage: Test Identification Parade Report

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

TIP report submitted. Witness identified accused.

Learning:

TIP report submitted. Witness identified accused. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 09-01-2025
Stage: Order Pronouncement

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

The court pronounced a reasoned order on discharge application.

Learning:

The court pronounced a reasoned order on discharge application. The courtroom

proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 10-01-2025
Stage: Adjournment Request

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date.

Learning:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date. The
courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured
procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or
evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal
intricacies.
Date: 11-01-2025
Stage: Committal to Sessions

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court.

Learning:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 12-01-2025
Stage: Submission of Charge Sheet

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.

Learning:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.
The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who
ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit
arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 13-01-2025
Stage: Video Evidence Review

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence.

Learning:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 14-01-2025
Stage: Medical Testimony

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Doctor presented injury report and explained observations.

Learning:

Doctor presented injury report and explained observations. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 15-01-2025
Stage: Submission of Charge Sheet

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.

Learning:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.
The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who
ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit
arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 16-01-2025
Stage: Confessional Statement Recording

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Accused gave confessional statement before magistrate.

Learning:

Accused gave confessional statement before magistrate. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 17-01-2025
Stage: Committal to Sessions

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court.

Learning:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 18-01-2025
Stage: Arguments on Charge

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow.

Learning:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow. The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the
judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to
submit arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 19-01-2025
Stage: Remand Hearing

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Judicial custody was extended. Defense did not object.

Learning:

Judicial custody was extended. Defense did not object. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 20-01-2025
Stage: Arguments on Charge

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow.

Learning:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow. The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the
judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to
submit arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 21-01-2025
Stage: Submission of Charge Sheet

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.

Learning:

The IO submitted the final charge sheet. The court verified details and informed the defense.
The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who
ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit
arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 22-01-2025
Stage: Forensic Expert Examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence.

Learning:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 23-01-2025
Stage: Framing of Charges

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Judge read out charges. The accused denied guilt and sought trial.

Learning:

Judge read out charges. The accused denied guilt and sought trial. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 24-01-2025
Stage: In-camera Deposition

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions.

Learning:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 25-01-2025
Stage: Committal to Sessions

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court.

Learning:

Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions Court. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 26-01-2025
Stage: In-camera Deposition

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions.

Learning:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 27-01-2025
Stage: Framing of Charges

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Judge read out charges. The accused denied guilt and sought trial.

Learning:

Judge read out charges. The accused denied guilt and sought trial. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 28-01-2025
Stage: In-camera Deposition

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions.

Learning:

Victim gave testimony in-camera under protection provisions. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 29-01-2025
Stage: Final Arguments

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Both parties summarized their case. Judge reserved judgment.

Learning:

Both parties summarized their case. Judge reserved judgment. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 30-01-2025
Stage: Confessional Statement Recording

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Accused gave confessional statement before magistrate.

Learning:

Accused gave confessional statement before magistrate. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 31-01-2025
Stage: Forensic Expert Examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence.

Learning:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 32-01-2025
Stage: Forensic Expert Examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence.

Learning:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 33-01-2025
Stage: Re-examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Prosecution re-examined witness to clarify issues raised in cross.

Learning:

Prosecution re-examined witness to clarify issues raised in cross. The courtroom

proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 34-01-2025
Stage: Arguments on Charge

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow.

Learning:

Both sides argued the sufficiency of evidence to frame charges. The judge indicated an order
would follow. The courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the
judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to
submit arguments or evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and
understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 35-01-2025
Stage: Adjournment Request

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date.

Learning:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date. The
courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured
procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or
evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal
intricacies.

Date: 36-01-2025
Stage: Video Evidence Review

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Absent

What Happened in Court:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence.

Learning:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 37-01-2025
Stage: Remand Hearing

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Judicial custody was extended. Defense did not object.

Learning:

Judicial custody was extended. Defense did not object. The courtroom proceedings were
conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 38-01-2025
Stage: Video Evidence Review

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence.

Learning:

CCTV footage was played in court and accepted as evidence. The courtroom proceedings
were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural fairness. Both
parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This stage was
crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.
Date: 39-01-2025
Stage: Forensic Expert Examination

Advocate for Prosecution: Present

Advocate for Accused: Absent
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence.

Learning:

Forensic specialist explained lab results linking accused to evidence. The courtroom
proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured procedural
fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or evidence. This
stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal intricacies.

Date: 40-01-2025
Stage: Adjournment Request

Advocate for Prosecution: Absent

Advocate for Accused: Present
Accused: Present

What Happened in Court:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date.

Learning:

Defense requested adjournment due to lawyer’s absence. Court granted short date. The
courtroom proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the judge who ensured
procedural fairness. Both parties were given equal opportunity to submit arguments or
evidence. This stage was crucial in moving the case forward and understanding its legal
intricacies.