Software Quality: Definition, Attributes, Cost, Defects,

Reviews, Measurement, and Metrics

●​ Defining Software Quality: A Comprehensive Overview
○​ Initial Conceptions of Quality: Software quality, at its core, is the measure of
how well a software product aligns with its intended purpose and satisfies the
needs of its users.1 This fundamental concept encompasses not only the
explicit requirements defined at the outset of a project but also the implicit
expectations and desires of the stakeholders who will interact with the
software.3 The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) defines
software quality as the degree to which a system, component, or process
meets specified requirements, while also acknowledging the importance of
fulfilling user needs and expectations.2 Understanding both the formal
specifications and the often unstated needs of customers is therefore
paramount in achieving better software quality.2 Fitness for purpose is another
traditional way to define software quality, emphasizing the extent to which the
software meets the specific needs it was designed to address, as typically
documented in the Software Requirements Specification (SRS).4 However,
achieving quality extends beyond mere functional correctness. While a
software product might perform all its functions as outlined, it can still be
considered low quality if it is difficult or frustrating to use; usability is an
equally critical aspect.4 Furthermore, software quality can be viewed from
different perspectives. Functional quality pertains to how well the software
adheres to its design based on the functional requirements, essentially
ensuring that the software does what it is supposed to do. In contrast,
structural quality focuses on how the software meets non-functional
requirements, such as its robustness, maintainability, and overall architecture,
which are crucial for the software's long-term health and adaptability.5 It is
also important to recognize that software quality is not a fixed entity but
rather a dynamic attribute that evolves with the customer's experiences and
the ever-changing landscape of the competitive market.5 Insight: A
comprehensive understanding of software quality requires acknowledging its
multifaceted nature, which includes meeting explicit requirements, satisfying
implicit user needs, excelling in both functional and structural aspects, and
adapting to the evolving demands of the market and users.
○​ Perspectives on Software Quality: Software quality can be examined from
various viewpoints, each offering unique insights into its different facets.1
From a product perspective, quality is often assessed by examining
characteristics such as reliability, which speaks to the software's consistency
 and stability; usability, which concerns the ease and effectiveness of user
interaction; performance, which relates to the software's speed and
efficiency; and security, which addresses its ability to protect data and
prevent unauthorized access.1 Conversely, a process perspective focuses on
the disciplined methods and best practices employed during the software
development lifecycle, recognizing that a robust and well-managed process is
more likely to yield a higher quality product.1 The achievement of software
quality is thus a result of the intricate interplay between the people involved,
the processes they follow, and the technology they utilize.1 The ISO/IEC 25010
standard provides a widely recognized and structured framework for
understanding software quality by defining eight key quality characteristics:
Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Usability,
Reliability, Security, Maintainability, and Portability.6 This standard offers a
detailed breakdown of these characteristics into sub-characteristics,
providing a granular approach to evaluating different dimensions of software
quality. In contrast, Boehm's Quality Model, as highlighted in 57, presents a
more user-centric perspective by categorizing quality into three main aspects:
Product Operation, which focuses on the software's runtime behavior and
efficiency; Product Revision, which considers the ease with which the
software can be modified and maintained; and Product Transition, which
addresses the software's adaptability to different environments and its
interoperability with other systems. This model emphasizes the software's
lifecycle and its sustained value to the user. Insight: Different stakeholders
within a software project, from end-users to developers and managers, may
prioritize different aspects of software quality. While comprehensive
standards like ISO 25010 offer a detailed and structured approach to defining
quality attributes, user-focused models like Boehm's underscore the
importance of considering the software's value and experience from the
end-user's standpoint. A holistic approach to software quality management
should therefore consider these diverse perspectives.
○​ The Role of Software Quality Assurance (SQA): Software Quality
Assurance (SQA) plays a pivotal role in ensuring that the software
development process yields a high-quality product.13 SQA is fundamentally
concerned with establishing and verifying that the processes, procedures,
and standards adopted for a project are suitable and are implemented
correctly throughout the software lifecycle.13 Unlike quality control, which
often focuses on inspecting the final product, SQA works in parallel with
software development, emphasizing a proactive approach to prevent
problems before they escalate into major issues.13 It acts as an overarching
 umbrella activity that is applied across all stages of the software process.13 As
outlined in 1, SQA encompasses a range of activities, including quality
planning, which involves defining quality objectives and requirements; quality
control, which focuses on measuring quality characteristics and identifying
defects; quality assurance (as a specific set of processes to ensure
compliance with procedures); and quality improvement, which involves
analyzing defects and enhancing processes. Verification and validation (V&V)
are also integral components of SQA, ensuring that the software meets its
intended requirements and that these requirements accurately reflect
stakeholder needs.1 Insight: Software Quality Assurance is not merely a phase
at the end of development but an ongoing and integrated set of activities that
span the entire software development lifecycle. Its primary focus is on
building quality into the software from the beginning through proactive
measures, process adherence, and continuous evaluation, ultimately aiming to
prevent defects and ensure the delivery of a high-quality product.
●​ Deconstructing Software Quality Attributes
○​ Definition and Importance:​
Software Quality Attributes (SQAs) are the measurable characteristics that
define how effectively, efficiently, and adaptably a software system
operates.15 These attributes allow for a comprehensive evaluation of software
performance that extends beyond simply whether the software functions as
intended.15 Often referred to with the suffix "ilities," such as reliability,
usability, and scalability 16, these attributes represent architecturally
significant requirements that necessitate careful consideration and planning
by software architects.18 They are not just desirable traits but are
fundamental to the system's evolution and act as essential constraints that
guide changes over time.19​
The importance of software quality attributes cannot be overstated. They are
crucial for achieving customer satisfaction, ensuring business success,
reducing development and maintenance costs, maintaining compliance with
regulations, and safeguarding the security of the system and its data.15 Given
their profound impact, it is vital that these attributes are considered early in
the software development lifecycle 15, as they heavily influence the system's
architecture and the overall quality of the final product.​
Insight: Software quality attributes are the non-functional cornerstones of a
robust software system. They dictate the system's essential qualities and must
be a primary focus from the outset of development to ensure a successful
and sustainable product.
○​ Key Quality Attributes (Based on ISO/IEC 25010 and other sources):​
The ISO/IEC 25010 standard provides a detailed framework of software
quality, encompassing the following key attributes 6:
■​ Functional Suitability: This attribute refers to the degree to which the
software provides functions that meet the stated and implied needs of
users under specific conditions. It includes sub-characteristics like
completeness (covering all specified tasks), correctness (providing
accurate results), and appropriateness (facilitating task accomplishment).
■​ Performance Efficiency: This describes how well the software performs
its functions within specified time and throughput parameters, while
efficiently using resources such as CPU, memory, and network.
Sub-characteristics include time behavior (response time and
throughput), resource utilization (amount and type of resources used),
and capacity (maximum limits of parameters).
■​ Compatibility: This refers to the software's ability to exchange
information with other products, systems, or components, and to function
effectively while sharing the same environment and resources. It includes
co-existence (performing functions efficiently alongside other products)
and interoperability (exchanging and using information with other
products).
■​ Usability: This attribute focuses on the degree to which the software can
be easily used by specified users to achieve specific tasks in various
contexts. It encompasses appropriateness recognizability (users can
identify if the software meets their needs), learnability (ease of learning),
operability (ease of operation and control), user error protection
(preventing user mistakes), user engagement (inviting and motivating
interface), inclusivity (use by diverse backgrounds), user assistance
(support for a wide range of users), and self-descriptiveness (obvious
capabilities and use).
■​ Reliability: This describes the software's ability to perform specified
functions under specified conditions for a specified period.
Sub-characteristics include maturity (reliability during normal operation),
availability (operational and accessible when needed), fault tolerance
(operating despite hardware or software faults), and recoverability (ability
to restore data after an interruption).
■​ Security: This refers to the software's ability to protect information and
data from security vulnerabilities. It includes confidentiality (data
accessible only to authorized users), integrity (preventing unauthorized
modification), non-repudiation (proof of actions), accountability (tracing
actions to specific entities), authenticity (verifying identities), and
 resistance (to attacks).
■​ Maintainability: This describes how easily the software can be modified
to improve, correct, or adapt to changes. Sub-characteristics include
modularity (components can be changed with minimal impact), reusability
(assets can be used in multiple systems), analysability (ease of diagnosing
issues), modifiability (changes without introducing defects), and testability
(effectiveness of test criteria).
■​ Portability: This refers to how easily the software can be transferred to
different environments. Sub-characteristics include adaptability (for
different hardware or software), installability (ease of installation), and
replaceability (potential to substitute similar products). Beyond the ISO
standard, Scalability, which is the ability of the software to handle
increased load efficiently 15, and Testability, which is the ease with which
the software can be tested to detect defects 15, are also frequently cited
as critical quality attributes in software development.
Table 1: ISO/IEC 25010 Software Quality Characteristics and Sub-characteristics
Quality Characteristic Sub-characteristics

Functional Suitability Functional completeness, Functional

correctness, Functional appropriateness

Performance Efficiency Time behavior, Resource utilization, Capacity

Compatibility Co-existence, Interoperability

Usability Appropriateness recognizability, Learnability,

Operability, User error protection, User
engagement, Inclusivity, User assistance,
Self-descriptiveness

Reliability Maturity, Availability, Fault tolerance,

Recoverability

Security Confidentiality, Integrity, Non-repudiation,

Accountability, Authenticity, Resistance

Maintainability Modularity, Reusability, Analysability,

Modifiability, Testability
 Portability Adaptability, Installability, Replaceability

**Insight:** The ISO 25010 standard provides a comprehensive and widely

recognized set of software quality attributes, offering a detailed framework for
evaluating various critical aspects of software quality. While this standard is thorough,
attributes like scalability and testability are also frequently emphasized in the software
development community due to their practical importance.​
* **Specifying and Measuring Quality Attributes:**​
The ISO/IEC 25010 standard not only defines software quality attributes but also
provides a basis for their specification and measurement by outlining criteria and
sub-criteria for each characteristic.[7] Effective quality planning, as mentioned in [1],
involves clearly defining quality objectives, requirements, and targets for these
attributes. To ensure these attributes are met, [19] highlights the need to specify them
in a measurable way and to utilize automated tests for continuous evaluation.​
A balanced approach to measurement often involves employing both qualitative and
quantitative metrics.[24] Qualitative metrics, such as user feedback, provide insights
into aspects like usability and user satisfaction, while quantitative metrics, including
code coverage and defect density, offer objective measures of the software's internal
quality. It is also crucial to set realistic benchmarks for these metrics and align them
with the overarching business goals of the project.[24, 25]​
Tracking the trends of these metrics over time, as suggested by [57], allows for the
monitoring of progress and the identification of areas needing improvement.
Furthermore, as indicated in [15], utilizing tools for performance monitoring and
bottleneck identification is essential for measuring and optimizing performance
efficiency attributes.​
**Insight:** Specifying and measuring software quality attributes is a critical
process that requires a combination of leveraging established standards like ISO
25010, defining clear and measurable objectives, employing a mix of qualitative and
quantitative metrics, and utilizing appropriate tools for continuous monitoring and
analysis. This iterative process ensures that the software not only meets its functional
requirements but also achieves the desired levels of its quality attributes, ultimately
contributing to a successful and valuable product.​

●​ The Economic Impact of Software Quality: Understanding the Cost of

Quality
○​ Definition and Significance:​
The Cost of Quality (COQ) is a fundamental methodology that enables
organizations to determine the extent to which their resources are allocated
to activities aimed at preventing poor quality, appraising the quality of their
products or services, and addressing the costs resulting from internal and
external failures00, 113, 136, 138, 1. Essentially, COQ represents the cost of not
creating a quality product or service.26 It serves as a means to quantify the
financial impact of achieving and sustaining excellence in products and
services.28 As an essential tool, COQ allows organizations to track the
resources consumed for both good quality (efforts to prevent defects) and
poor quality (costs incurred due to defects).29 By providing a systematic way
to identify, quantify, and improve the quality of products and services, COQ
can also help prevent future quality-related problems.19​
Insight: Understanding and managing the Cost of Quality is vital for any
organization as it provides a clear financial perspective on the impact of
quality-related activities. By quantifying these costs, businesses can make
informed decisions about resource allocation, process improvements, and
ultimately enhance their profitability and customer satisfaction.
○​ Components of Cost of Quality:​
The Cost of Quality is typically categorized into two main areas: the Cost of
Good Quality (CoGQ) and the Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ).30
■​ Cost of Good Quality (CoGQ) comprises costs associated with
preventing defects (Prevention Costs) and those incurred in evaluating
products to ensure they meet quality standards (Appraisal Costs).
Prevention Costs are investments made to avoid or minimize the
occurrence of defects. Examples include training programs for developers
on secure coding practices 43, process improvement initiatives 31, quality
planning activities 31, design reviews 31, supplier evaluation 31, and the
implementation of tools and technologies to support quality assurance.44
Appraisal Costs, on the other hand, are incurred to identify defective
products before they are shipped to customers. These include activities
such as various types of software testing (unit, integration, system) 40,
code inspections and reviews 40, quality audits 31, calibration of testing
equipment 45, and supplier acceptance sampling.31
■​ Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) arises from defects that occur despite
prevention and appraisal efforts. It is further divided into Internal Failure
Costs, which are incurred when defects are detected before the product
is delivered to the customer, and External Failure Costs, which occur
when defects are found after the product has reached the customer.
 Internal Failure Costs include expenses related to rework 31, scrap or
disposal of defective products 31, repairs 31, retesting of reworked items 31,
and downtime caused by quality problems.31 External Failure Costs are
often more significant and include costs associated with warranty claims
31
, product returns and replacements 31, handling customer complaints 31,
product recalls 31, lost sales arising from a reputation of poor quality 31, and
potential damage to the company's brand image.31
Table 2: Cost of Quality Categories and Examples
Category Examples

Prevention Costs Training programs for developers, process

improvement initiatives, quality planning,
design reviews, supplier evaluation, code
reviews, writing unit and integration tests,
implementation of code analysis tools, quality
training for testers, preparation of quality
management system and inspection
procedures, cost of getting company certified
to ISO 9001.

Appraisal Costs Various types of software testing (unit,

integration, system), code inspections and
reviews, quality audits, calibration of testing
equipment, supplier acceptance sampling,
incoming inspection and testing, in-process
inspection and testing, final inspection and
testing, product quality audits, maintaining
accuracy of test equipment, inspection and test
materials and services, evaluation of stock
inventory, review of drawings.

Internal Failure Costs Rework, scrap or disposal of defective

products, repairs, retesting of reworked items,
downtime caused by quality problems,
in-process scrap and rework, troubleshooting
and repairing, design changes due to internal
quality issues, inventory required to support
poor process yields and rejected lots,
re-inspection/retest of reworked items,
inspection and re-inspection of the repaired
product, purchased material reject disposition
costs, rework of supplier rejects, extra
operations, downgraded end product.
 External Failure Costs Warranty repairs and replacement costs, cost
of field servicing and handling complaints, lost
sales arising from a reputation of poor quality,
product recalls, complaints in/out of warranty,
loss of reputation, sales returns and
allowances, replacing defective products,
service level agreement penalties, complaint
handling, field service labor and parts costs
incurred due to warranty obligations, legal
claims, lost customers and opportunities,
downgrading, processing of customer
complaints.

**Insight:** The PAF model provides a structured framework for understanding and
categorizing the various costs associated with software quality. By distinguishing
between the costs of preventing defects, appraising quality, and dealing with failures,
organizations can gain valuable insights into their quality-related expenditures and
identify areas for improvement.​
* **Relationship Between Prevention and Failure Costs:**​
A fundamental principle in quality management is the inverse relationship between
prevention costs and failure costs.[32] Generally, an increased investment in activities
aimed at preventing defects from occurring in the first place leads to a reduction in
the costs incurred when products or services fail to meet quality standards.[32]
Effective prevention is not merely an expenditure but rather a strategic investment
that ultimately prevents more significant costs associated with failures, such as
rework, warranty claims, and customer dissatisfaction.[44]​
The ultimate goal for organizations should be for their prevention costs to exceed
their failure costs. This indicates a proactive approach to quality, where efforts are
concentrated on building quality into the product or service rather than reacting to
problems after they arise.[32] A higher percentage of failure costs, on the other hand,
often suggests a reactive approach to quality management, highlighting potential
areas where increased investment in prevention could yield significant improvements
and cost savings.[32] Furthermore, research suggests that there is an optimal level of
quality investment where the cost of good quality (prevention and appraisal) and the
cost of poor quality (internal and external failures) intersect, resulting in the lowest
total cost of quality.[46] This optimum point often varies by industry and should be
determined through careful analysis.​
 **Insight:** By strategically investing in defect prevention, organizations can
significantly reduce the more substantial costs associated with product or service
failures. Understanding the optimal balance between prevention and failure costs is
crucial for maximizing efficiency and minimizing the total cost of quality.​
* **Tracking and Optimizing Cost of Quality:**​
Tracking the total cost of quality involves a structured approach that extends
beyond simply measuring the costs of rework and quality control.[46] It requires
considering both the visible costs, such as those directly related to fixing defects, and
the less obvious, or hidden, costs that can have a significant impact on the bottom
line.[46] A useful framework for this is Val Feigenbaum's PAF model, which segments
quality costs into good quality (prevention and appraisal) and poor quality (internal
and external failures).[46] It is important to track internal and external failure costs
separately, as the financial impact tends to increase dramatically once the product or
service leaves the organization.[46]​
For a pragmatic approach to tracking COQ, organizations should quantify each
quality management activity within the PAF model and establish a standard unit price
for various quality-related events, such as risk assessments, customer complaints, and
audits.[46] Utilizing industry benchmarks can also help in assigning monetary value
when building a business case for quality improvements.[46] Employing an ROI
calculator can further validate the impact of quality-related investments.[46]
Implementing a digital quality management system (eQMS) can provide immediate
insights into quality data and lower the cost of quality by automating tasks, providing
reports, triggering alarms, and facilitating access to audit data.[46] Data collection,
consolidation, analysis, and the derivation of actionable insights from this analysis are
also key to optimizing the Cost of Quality.[31] Regular monitoring of COQ provides
vital feedback, allowing organizations to identify inefficiencies and quality issues early
and implement timely corrections.[47] Tools like SafetyCulture can aid in this process
by enabling the creation of quality audits to identify problems and track associated
costs.[29]​
**Insight:** Effectively tracking and optimizing the Cost of Quality necessitates a
comprehensive and systematic approach that includes identifying all relevant costs,
utilizing established models like the PAF model, leveraging technology for automation
and insights, and continuously analyzing the collected data to drive informed
decisions and improvements in quality management practices.​

●​ The Lifecycle of Software Defects: From Error to Failure

○​ Defining Defect, Fault, and Failure: In the realm of software quality,
understanding the distinctions between an error, a defect (often referred to as
a bug), and a failure is crucial for effective quality management.1 An error
 represents a human action or omission made by any stakeholder involved in
the software development process, such as a developer making a mistake in
coding or a requirements analyst misunderstanding a user need.1 This human
error can then lead to the introduction of a defect (or bug) into the software.1
A defect is essentially a flaw or imperfection in the software code, design, or
documentation that may cause the software to behave incorrectly.48 It is a
manifestation of the error in the software artifact. The term fault is often used
interchangeably with defect or bug.50 According to ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765, a fault
is defined as a "manifestation of an error in software".49 It can also be viewed
as an incorrect internal state within the software 51 or an abnormal condition
that has the potential to cause an element or item to fail.49 Finally, a failure
occurs when the software, during its execution, is unable to perform its
required functions within specified performance requirements.50 It is the
observable result of a defect or fault, representing the termination of the
software's ability to function as intended or an external, incorrect behavior
with respect to the expected behavior.1 Insight: The journey from a software
issue typically begins with a human error, which results in a defect being
introduced into the software code or design. This defect, also known as a fault
or bug, remains latent until the affected part of the software is executed
under certain conditions, at which point it can manifest as a failure, which is
the externally visible deviation from the expected software behavior.
○​ Defect Rate and Reliability: The defect rate is a key metric used to assess
the quality of software. It is commonly defined as the number of defects
found within a specific period, often normalized by the size of the software,
such as per thousand lines of code (KLOC or KSLOC).53 Alternatively, it can be
expressed as the percentage of defects found relative to the total work
delivered, such as user stories or test cases.54 The formula for defect rate is
often calculated as (Number of Defects Found / Deliverables) × 100.55
Software reliability, on the other hand, is a set of attributes that describes
the software's ability to maintain a specified level of performance under
stated conditions for a defined period.53 It speaks to the consistency and
stability of the software in various operational environments.56 According to
the ISO 25010 standard, reliability is "the degree to which a system or
component performs specified functions under specified conditions for a
specified period of time".12 Measurement: Defect rate is typically measured
by meticulously tracking the number of defects identified during various
stages of testing and after the software has been released to production. This
count is then often divided by a measure of the software's size (like KLOC) or
the amount of testing performed (like the number of test cases executed).54
 Software reliability can be measured using metrics such as Mean Time
Between Failures (MTBF), which indicates the average time a system operates
before a failure occurs, and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR), which measures the
average time taken to restore a failed system to operation.57 Insight: The
defect rate serves as a quantitative indicator of the flaws present in the
software, while software reliability reflects the software's ability to function
without failure over a period. A lower defect rate generally contributes to
higher software reliability, as fewer defects inherently reduce the likelihood of
operational failures and contribute to a more stable and dependable product.
○​ Factors Influencing Defect Rate: The rate at which defects are introduced
into software is influenced by a multitude of factors spanning the entire
software development lifecycle.55 One significant factor is code complexity;
more intricate and convoluted code tends to be more prone to errors.55 The
thoroughness of testing plays a critical role, as more comprehensive and
rigorous testing efforts are more likely to uncover a higher number of
defects.59 The experience of the development team also has an impact,
with more experienced developers often introducing fewer defects.59
Volatility of requirements, where the needs and specifications for the
software change frequently, can lead to increased defect rates.59 The
presence of technical debt, which refers to the backlog of technical issues
caused by prioritizing speed over quality, can also contribute to a higher
number of defects.59 The development methodology adopted, such as Agile
or Waterfall, can also influence the defect rate, with Agile methods, when
properly implemented, often leading to lower rates due to their iterative nature
and early testing focus.55 The quality of code reviews, where peers examine
the code for potential issues, is another crucial factor in defect detection and
prevention.60 The inherent talent of the developers on the team can also
affect the rate at which defects are introduced.60 Finally, the testing methods
and tools employed can significantly impact the effectiveness of defect
detection.60 Insight: The number of defects found in software is not solely a
measure of coding ability but is a result of a complex interplay of factors
related to the software's inherent characteristics, the skills and experience of
the development team, the processes and methodologies followed, and the
rigor of the testing and quality assurance efforts. Understanding these
influencing factors is essential for implementing effective strategies to control
and reduce the defect rate.
●​ Proactive Quality Assurance: Defect Prevention, Reduction, and
Containment Strategies
○​ Importance of Defect Prevention: A fundamental tenet of quality assurance
 in software development is that preventing defects from occurring in the first
place is significantly more effective and cost-efficient than attempting to fix
them later in the development lifecycle or, even worse, after the software has
been released.52 As highlighted in 52, the earlier a defect is detected, the
easier and less expensive it is to rectify. This proactive approach ultimately
leads to a reduction in the amount of rework required and a decrease in
overall project costs.52 The primary goal of defect prevention is to produce a
software product with zero or minimal defects, which in turn results in higher
quality deliverables and greater satisfaction for the customers or end-users.52
Insight: Investing effort and resources in preventing defects early in the
software development process is not just a matter of improving the quality of
the final product; it also represents a sound economic strategy that minimizes
the costs and effort associated with defect remediation and contributes to a
more efficient and successful development process.
○​ Strategies for Defect Prevention: Effective defect prevention in software
development requires a multi-faceted approach encompassing various stages
of the software lifecycle.40 It begins with thorough Software Requirements
Analysis, ensuring that customer needs are accurately translated into clear
and testable specifications through detailed analysis, pre-test reviews, and
iterative feedback sessions with stakeholders.52 Reviews play a crucial role,
including self-reviews by developers, peer reviews by colleagues, technical
reviews by subject matter experts, and formal inspections conducted using
defined processes and checklists.13 A systematic approach to Defect Logging
and Documentation is essential for recording, investigating, and resolving
any defects that do arise.52 Root Cause Analysis is critical for identifying the
underlying reasons why defects are introduced, allowing for the
implementation of preventive measures to avoid their recurrence.52 This often
involves using tools like Pareto charts to prioritize common defect types and
cause-and-effect diagrams to understand the relationships between causes
and defects.52 Furthermore, Process Improvement by embedding defect
prevention measures into the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and
leveraging lessons learned from past projects is vital for long-term quality
enhancement.52 Adherence to established Standards and Best Practices,
such as coding standards and design principles, as well as providing
comprehensive Training and Education to developers on quality-related
topics, are also key preventive measures.40 The use of Static Analysis Tools
to automatically scan code for potential defects and vulnerabilities, and the
implementation of Unit and Integration Testing early in the development
process to catch defects at a granular level, are further important strategies
 for preventing defects from propagating to later stages.40 Insight: A robust
defect prevention strategy integrates a range of activities across the software
development lifecycle, from the initial requirements gathering to the ongoing
refinement of development processes. By focusing on understanding and
addressing the root causes of defects, and by utilizing both human expertise
and automated tools, organizations can significantly reduce the number of
defects introduced into their software.
○​ Defect Reduction and Containment: While preventing all defects may be an
unattainable ideal, implementing strategies for defect reduction and
containment is crucial for minimizing their impact.64 Early detection is
paramount, and this is where practices like the Shift Left approach in QA
come into play, advocating for the inclusion of testing activities as early as
possible in the SDLC.64 This proactive strategy allows for the identification and
resolution of bugs when they are significantly less expensive and
time-consuming to fix. Implementing continuous code reviews and starting
test automation alongside development further supports this early
detection.64 Automation for Repetitive Testing, particularly for tasks like
regression testing, helps to ensure consistency and can free up human testers
to focus on more complex and exploratory testing efforts.64 The query also
mentions the importance of Different Types of Software Review, which
serve as key defect reduction mechanisms by allowing for the systematic
examination of software artifacts at various stages of development. In
addition to these review processes, the concept of inspection, although more
commonly associated with physical products, has parallels in software
development. While the snippets on In-process inspections 71 and Final
quality inspection 79 primarily discuss manufacturing contexts, the
underlying principle of conducting thorough checks at strategic points in the
process to identify and contain defects before they reach the customer is
highly relevant to software development as well (e.g., code inspections at
different stages, final build verification). Insight: Defect reduction and
containment are achieved through a combination of proactive measures that
emphasize early detection and resolution. By integrating testing and review
processes throughout the development lifecycle, and by leveraging
automation to enhance efficiency and consistency, organizations can
significantly minimize the number of defects that make their way into the final
software product.
●​ Ensuring Quality Through Software Review Processes
○​ Definition and Objectives of Software Review:​
A software review is a systematic examination of software work products,
 such as requirements documents, design specifications, code, and test plans,
conducted by one or more individuals to identify and resolve errors and
defects at various stages of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC).61 It
serves as a crucial mechanism for validating the quality, functionality, and
other essential features of the software against the requirements set forth by
the client.61 As highlighted in 1, reviews are a form of static testing used to
evaluate work products against clearly defined standards.​
The primary objectives of software reviews, as outlined in 61, are multifaceted.
They aim to improve the overall productivity of the development team by
catching issues early, thereby making the subsequent testing process more
time and cost-effective. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that the final
software product is delivered with a significantly reduced number of defects
and that any inadequacies in the software or the development process are
identified and eliminated.​
Insight: Software reviews are a vital quality assurance practice that goes
beyond simply detecting errors. They are intended to enhance the efficiency
of the development process, improve the quality of the software by finding
and fixing defects early, and ensure that the final product aligns closely with
the client's needs and expectations.
○​ Different Types of Software Reviews (Based on ISTQB and other sources):​
Software reviews encompass a range of techniques, each with its own level of
formality and specific objectives.62 Informal Reviews are characterized by
their lack of a defined process and can take various forms, such as pair
programming or a technical lead briefly reviewing code or designs. These
reviews offer a quick and inexpensive way to gain some benefit, though their
effectiveness can vary depending on the reviewers involved.62 Walkthroughs
are typically led by the author of the work product, who guides the
participants through the document using scenarios or dry runs to foster a
common understanding and gather feedback. These sessions are generally
open-ended and may or may not involve pre-meeting preparation or formal
documentation of findings.61​
Technical Reviews are less formal than inspections but more structured than
walkthroughs. They are usually led by a trained moderator or a technical
expert and often involve peer reviews without direct management
participation. The primary focus is on examining the technical content of the
software product to ensure the correct application of technical concepts and
to identify any deviations from specifications and standards.61 Inspections
represent the most formal type of review. Led by a trained moderator who is
not the author, inspections involve a defined process with specific roles,
 checklists, and entry and exit criteria. Reviewers prepare thoroughly before
the meeting, and the process includes metrics gathering and a formal
follow-up to address any identified defects.61 Management Reviews are
conducted to evaluate the overall progress of the work and to make decisions
regarding subsequent activities in the project.61 Audit Reviews are a type of
external review where individuals who are not part of the development team
independently examine the software product and its processes to assess their
compliance with stated specifications and standards.61 Other types include
Checklist-based Reviews, which utilize a predefined list of questions or
required attributes to guide the review 65, and Peer Reviews, which are
performed by colleagues who possess the necessary skills to create the work
product being reviewed.61​
Table 3: Types of Software Reviews and Their Characteristics

Review Formality Leader Purpose Participa Preparati Documen

Type Level nts on tation

Informal Low Author or Quick Author, Optional Optional

Review Lead feedback, Peers,
knowledg Technical
e sharing Lead

Walkthrou Low to Author Understan Author, Optional Optional

gh Medium ding, Reviewers,
learning, Scribe
defect (optional)
finding

Technical Medium Moderator Technical Technical Required Review

Review or Expert correctne Experts, Report
ss, Peers,
consistenc Architects,
y, defect Designers,
finding Key Users

Inspection High Trained Formal Moderator Required Inspection

Moderator defect , Author, Report,
detection, Reviewers, Logging
process Reader List
improvem (optional),
ent, Scribe
metrics
 gathering

Managem Medium to Managem Evaluate Managem Varies Varies

ent High ent progress, ent,
Review make Project
decisions Leaders,
on next Key
steps Stakehold
ers

Audit High Auditors Independe External Required Audit

Review nt Auditors, Report
assessme Managem
nt of ent,
complianc Developm
e with ent Team
standards (for
and informatio
specificati n)
ons

Checklist- Medium Reviewer Systemati Author, Required Varies

based c Reviewers
evaluation
against
predefine
d criteria

Peer Low to Varies Quality Colleague Optional Optional

Review High improvem s with
ent, similar
defect expertise
finding,
knowledg
e sharing

**Insight:** The diverse range of software review types allows development teams
to select the most appropriate technique based on the specific goals, the nature of
the work product being reviewed, and the resources available. The level of formality
and the specific objectives of each type of review are key considerations in making
this selection.​
* **The Review Process:**​
A typical software review process, particularly for more formal types like technical
reviews and inspections, generally follows a structured set of steps.[61, 67] It often
begins with an **Entry Evaluation** to ensure that the work product meets the
necessary criteria for review and that all participants are adequately prepared.
**Management Preparation** involves assigning roles (e.g., moderator, reviewer,
scribe), gathering the required resources, and providing a clear brief on the review's
objectives. **Review Planning** includes defining the scope of the review, inviting
relevant stakeholders, and scheduling the review meeting. **Preparation** is a critical
phase where reviewers individually examine the work product, becoming familiar with
its content and identifying potential issues or concerns. The **Examination** phase is
the actual review meeting, where reviewers collaborate to discuss the findings, record
any identified defects or concerns, and engage in candid communication to ensure a
thorough evaluation. Following the examination, an **Exit Evaluation** is conducted to
assess the results of the review, determine if the work product meets the defined
criteria, and plan any necessary remedial actions based on the reported flaws. The
process often includes **Rework and Follow-up**, where the author addresses the
identified issues, and the changes are reviewed to ensure they have been adequately
resolved. Finally, the overall effectiveness of the review process itself is often
assessed to identify areas for improvement.​
**Insight:** A well-defined and consistently followed review process is essential for
maximizing the benefits of software reviews. By structuring the review into distinct
phases, from initial planning to final follow-up, organizations can ensure that reviews
are conducted effectively, leading to the identification and resolution of defects and
ultimately contributing to higher quality software.​

●​ Introduction to Measurement and Inspection in Software Quality Assurance

○​ Importance of Measurement in Software Quality: Measurement plays a
fundamental role in the field of software quality assurance by providing the
objective data necessary for understanding, controlling, and improving the
quality of software products.68 Accurate and consistent measurement enables
organizations to make realistic assessments about the current state of their
software, establish and regulate acceptable levels of quality, and predict the
future quality of the software based on trends.68 Furthermore, the collection
and analysis of data related to both the software development process and
the resulting product are primary ways in which organizations monitor and
manage quality.68 This data provides crucial information that supports
quantitative decision-making by managers, allowing them to allocate
 resources effectively and make informed choices about process
improvements.69 By measuring quality from the early stages of development,
organizations can proactively prevent high-risk situations and identify
solutions to potential problems before they escalate.69 Ultimately, the effective
use of measurement in software quality assurance contributes to reaching
predictable levels of performance and ensuring that the software meets the
required standards and expectations.69 Insight: Software quality
measurement is a cornerstone of effective software engineering practice. It
provides the empirical evidence needed to gauge the effectiveness of
development processes, the quality of the software product, and the degree
to which organizational goals and user expectations are being met. Without
consistent and relevant measurement, quality assurance efforts would lack
the objectivity necessary for continuous improvement and informed
decision-making.
○​ The Inspection Process in Software Quality: Inspection is a critical quality
control activity in software development, serving as a systematic examination
of software work products by one or more individuals to identify and resolve
errors and defects.4 It acts as an instrument for ensuring the quality of the
software and verifying whether the product meets specified requirements.70
The inspection process is not limited to any single phase of the software
lifecycle; rather, it can be applied at various stages, including the inspection of
requirements, design documents, code, and test plans.4 In the context of the
software development process, inspection helps to check for quality and
identify ways to minimize development costs and reduce waste associated
with defects.70 Different types of inspections can be conducted, including
source or supplier inspection (examining third-party code or components),
receiving inspection (analyzing newly developed code or modules), shop floor
or in-process inspection (reviewing code during development phases), final
inspection (verifying the complete software build), first article inspection
(examining the initial version of a component or feature), returned material
inspection (analyzing code that has been reworked), and stocked
re-inspections (reviewing existing code for newly discovered issues).4
Furthermore, in-process inspection is recognized as a vital component for
maintaining the integrity of the software as it is being developed and for
ensuring efficiency in the development pipeline.71 Insight: Software inspection
is a hands-on, detail-oriented quality control technique that involves a
methodical examination of software artifacts by trained individuals. Its
application across different stages of the development lifecycle allows for the
early detection and correction of defects, contributing significantly to the
 overall quality and reliability of the final software product.
○​ Relationship Between Measurement and Inspection: While measurement
and inspection are distinct activities within software quality assurance, they
are also inherently related and often work in tandem to ensure a high-quality
product. Inspection, as a process of systematic examination, serves as a
primary source of raw data for software quality measurement. For instance,
during a code inspection, the number of defects found, their severity, and the
time taken to identify them can all be recorded. This collected data then
forms the basis for various software quality metrics, such as defect density
(number of defects per unit size), defect rate (number of defects found over a
period), and inspection efficiency (number of defects found per inspection
effort). By analyzing these metrics, organizations can gain valuable insights
into the effectiveness of their development processes, the quality of the
software being produced, and the performance of the inspection process
itself. Therefore, inspection provides the tangible findings that are then
quantified and analyzed through measurement, creating a feedback loop that
drives continuous improvement in software quality. Insight: Measurement and
inspection are complementary and interconnected processes in software
quality assurance. Inspection provides the qualitative and quantitative data
points through the systematic examination of software artifacts, while
measurement involves the analysis and interpretation of this data to assess
quality, track progress, and inform decisions for process improvement.
●​ Leveraging Documents and Metrics for Effective Software Quality
Management
○​ Common Documents in Software Quality Assurance: Effective software
quality management relies heavily on comprehensive documentation that
supports all phases of the development lifecycle and quality assurance
activities. One of the foundational documents is the Software Requirements
Specification (SRS) 4, which meticulously outlines both the functional and
non-functional requirements that the software must meet. The Software
Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) 67 is another crucial document that details
the specific QA activities, procedures, tools, and techniques that will be
employed throughout the project to ensure adherence to quality standards.
During the testing phase, Test Plans 57 are developed to define the scope,
approach, resources, and schedule of testing efforts, while Test Cases 54
provide specific, step-by-step instructions for verifying individual aspects of
the software's functionality and quality attributes. When defects are
identified, they are recorded and tracked using Bug Reports or Defect
Tracking Logs.1 The outcomes of review processes are documented in
 Review Reports 62, and similarly, the results of formal inspections are
recorded in Inspection Reports.4 To ensure that all requirements are
adequately tested, a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) 73 is often
used to map requirements to specific test cases. At the conclusion of testing
cycles, Test Summary Reports 78 provide an overview of the testing activities,
including key metrics and an assessment of the overall quality. Finally, Effort
and Time Logs 78 are maintained to track the resources expended on various
QA tasks, which is essential for cost analysis and project management.
Insight: A well-maintained and comprehensive set of documents is
indispensable for effective software quality assurance. These documents not
only provide a blueprint for QA activities but also serve as a record of the
quality achieved and the efforts undertaken to ensure it.
○​ Key Metrics Used in Software Quality Assurance: Software quality
assurance relies on a variety of metrics to provide quantitative insights into
the quality of the software and the effectiveness of the QA processes.1
Defect-Related Metrics are crucial for understanding the presence and
characteristics of flaws in the software. These include Defect density, which
measures the number of defects per unit of software size; Defect rate, which
indicates the frequency of defect occurrence; Defect leakage, which tracks
the number of defects that escape into production; Defect Removal
Efficiency (DRE), which assesses the effectiveness of defect identification
and removal processes; Bug reopen rate, which indicates the stability of
defect fixes; Mean Time to Detect (MTTD), the average time to discover a
defect; Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), the average time to fix a defect;
Escaped defects, those missed during development; and
Customer-reported defects, which reflect the end-user experience.
Test-Related Metrics provide insights into the testing efforts. Key examples
include Test case pass rate, the percentage of tests that passed; First-time
pass rate, the percentage of tests that passed on their initial execution; Test
coverage, the extent to which the software is covered by tests;
Requirements coverage, the percentage of requirements verified by tests;
Test execution progress, the amount of testing completed; Test case
effectiveness, the percentage of executed tests that found defects; Test
case productivity, the efficiency of creating test cases; Test completion
status, the overall state of test execution; and Test review efficiency, the
effectiveness of the test case review process. Performance Metrics focus on
the software's operational characteristics, such as Response time, the delay
between a user action and the system's response; Throughput, the amount
of work the system can handle in a given time; and Resource utilization, the
 efficiency with which the software uses system resources. Reliability Metrics
include Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), the average time between
system crashes, and availability, the percentage of time the system is
operational. Cost-Related Metrics, such as the Cost of Quality (CoQ) and
the Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ), provide a financial perspective on quality
efforts and failures, while cost per bug fix indicates the expense of resolving
defects. Finally, Customer Satisfaction Metrics, such as the number of
customer complaints, rejects, returns, warranty costs, and the Net Promoter
Score (NPS), reflect the end-user's perception of the software's quality.
Insight: A comprehensive approach to software quality management involves
the careful selection and consistent tracking of a diverse set of metrics. These
metrics provide valuable data across various dimensions of quality, enabling
organizations to monitor their progress, identify areas for improvement, and
make data-driven decisions to enhance the quality of their software products
and processes.
●​ Conclusion: Building a Foundation for High-Quality Software​
The pursuit of software quality is a multifaceted endeavor that requires a deep
understanding of its definition, the critical attributes that contribute to it, the
economic implications of both achieving and neglecting it, the lifecycle of
defects, the proactive strategies for their prevention and reduction, the
importance of rigorous review processes, and the foundational role of
measurement and inspection. By embracing a holistic approach that integrates
these various elements, organizations can build a strong foundation for
developing and maintaining high-quality software products that meet the needs
and expectations of their users, while also ensuring efficiency and
cost-effectiveness in their development processes. The judicious use of
documentation and the consistent tracking of relevant metrics are essential for
providing the visibility and insights necessary for continuous improvement in the
quest for software excellence.

Works cited

1.​ What is Software Quality? - IEEE Computer Society, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.computer.org/resources/what-is-software-quality/
2.​ What is Software Quality in IEEE ? - YouTube, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPsYyqieSB4
3.​ Chapter 1: SQA – Definitions and Concepts - Software Quality [Book] - O'Reilly
Media, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/software-quality/9781119134497/c01.xhtml
4.​ Software Quality – Software Engineering | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-engineering-software-quality/
5.​ Software quality - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_quality
6.​ www.iso25000.com, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25010
7.​ ISO 25010: Enhancing Our Software Quality Management Process ..., accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://tech.helpware.com/blog/iso-25010-enhancing-our-software-quality-man
agement-process
8.​ What Is ISO 25010? | Perforce Software, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.perforce.com/blog/qac/what-is-iso-25010
9.​ iso - Why are cost and compliance not a software quality characteristic?,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/446250/why-are-cost
-and-compliance-not-a-software-quality-characteristic
10.​An Exploration of the ISO/IEC 25010 Software Quality Model - Codacy | Blog,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://blog.codacy.com/iso-25010-software-quality-model
11.​ Software Quality Standards—How and Why We Applied ISO 25010 - Monterail,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.monterail.com/blog/software-qa-standards-iso-25010
12.​The TIOBE Quality Indicator, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://tiobe.com/files/TIOBEQualityIndicator_v4_10.pdf
13.​Software Quality Assurance – Software Engineering | GeeksforGeeks, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-engineering-software-quality-assuranc
e/
14.​Software Quality Course - IEEE Computer Society, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.computer.org/product/education/software-quality-course/
15.​Software Quality Attributes: The Key to Building Robust Software - DEV
Community, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://dev.to/lahiru_rajapakshe_8634adb/software-quality-attributes-the-key-to-
building-robust-software-857
16.​Quality Attributes | IASA - BTABoK - GitHub Pages, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://iasa-global.github.io/btabok/quality_attributes.html
17.​What are Quality Attributes in Software Architecture, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.softwaretestingmaterial.com/quality-attributes-in-software-architect
ure/
18.​List of system quality attributes - Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_system_quality_attributes
19.​The importance of software quality attributes - SoftwareMill, accessed May 18,
2025, https://softwaremill.com/the-importance-of-software-quality-attributes/
20.​What are the Software Quality Attributes? - Testsigma, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://testsigma.com/blog/software-quality-attributes/
21.​Software Architecture Quality Attributes - Syndicode, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://syndicode.com/blog/12-software-architecture-quality-attributes/
22.​Ultimate Guide to Non-Functional Requirements for Architects -
workingsoftware.dev, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.workingsoftware.dev/the-ultimate-guide-to-write-non-functional-re
quirements/
23.​Software Quality Attributes in Software Engineering, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/what-are-the-quality-attributes/
24.​Ultimate Guide to Measuring Software Quality (Updated 2024) - Cortex, accessed
May 18, 2025, https://www.cortex.io/post/measuring-software-quality
25.​An Introduction to Software Quality Attributes for Non-Technical Founders -
ThinkNimble, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.thinknimble.com/cto-insights/an-introduction-to-software-quality-at
tributes-for-non-technical-founders
26.​Prevention costs - Quality Assurance Solutions, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.quality-assurance-solutions.com/Prevention-Costs.html
27.​What Are Appraisal Costs? Definition, How They Work, and Examples, accessed
May 18, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/appraisal-costs.asp
28.​The importance of Cost of Quality in software testing: From expense to
advantage - Solvd, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.solvd.com/blog/importance-of-cost-of-quality-in-software-testing
29.​Quality Costs: A Guide to Managing Them | SafetyCulture, accessed May 18,
2025, https://safetyculture.com/topics/quality-costs/
30.​What is Cost of Quality (COQ)? - ASQ, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://asq.org/quality-resources/cost-of-quality
31.​Quality Costs - We ask and you answer! The best answer wins! - Benchmark Six
Sigma Forum, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/34919-quality-costs/
32.​What is COPQ (Cost of Poor Quality)? - SixSigma.us, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.6sigma.us/process-improvement/copq-cost-of-poor-quality/
33.​Total Quality Management (TQM) - Management and Strategy Institute, accessed
May 18, 2025, https://www.msicertified.com/blog/total-quality-management-tqm/
34.​Cost of Quality: A Comprehensive Guide to Driving Profitability - SixSigma.us,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-in-focus/what-is-cost-of-quality/
35.​Cost of Quality: Not Only Failure Costs - iSixSigma, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.isixsigma.com/financial-analysis/cost-quality-not-only-failure-costs/
36.​Optimize the Total Costs of Quality - isixsigma.com, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.isixsigma.com/financial-analysis/optimize-the-total-costs-of-quality/
37.​Cost of Quality: Classification and Examples | Quality Gurus, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.qualitygurus.com/cost-of-quality/
38.​COPQ , Cost of Poor Quality - Benchmark Six Sigma, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/34890-copq-cost-of-poor-qu
ality/
39.​Cost of Quality Examples, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://qualityamerica.com/LSS-Knowledge-Center/qualitymanagement/cost_of_
quality_examples.php
40.​What is Cost of Quality in software testing? - Tuskr, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://tuskr.app/learn/cost-of-quality
41.​Cost of quality or lack thereof in software development | LLlnformatics -
LLInformatics, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.llinformatics.com/blog/cost-of-quality-in-software-development
42.​Unveiling the Hidden Costs: A Deep Dive into Cost of Quality (COQ)
Measurement - Day.io, accessed May 18, 2025, https://day.io/blog/cost-of-quality/
43.​Cost of Quality in Software Testing | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/cost-of-quality-in-software-testing/
44.​Chapter 2: Cost of Quality Guide: Prevention Costs | AlisQI, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.alisqi.com/en/guides/cost-of-quality/we-need-to-talk-about-prevent
ion-costs
45.​Cost of Quality – The Key to Better Performance and Savings, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.automotivequal.com/cost-of-quality-the-key-to-optimization/
46.​Technology - A pragmatic approach to tracking ... - Business Reporter, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://www.business-reporter.co.uk/technology/a-pragmatic-approach-to-tracki
ng-the-total-cost-of-quality
47.​What Is the Cost of Quality and How to Calculate It? - MRPeasy, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.mrpeasy.com/blog/cost-of-quality/
48.​A Systematic Literature Review of Software Defect Prediction: Research Trends,
Datasets, Methods and Frameworks - Neliti, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/90270-EN-a-systematic-literature-re
view-of-softwa.pdf
49.​automotive.wiki, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://automotive.wiki/index.php/Fault,_Error,_Failure#:~:text=Abnormal%20cond
ition%20(or%20defect)%20that,the%20definition%20of%20this%20wiki.
50.​Difference between a defect and a bug in testing? - Software Engineering Stack
Exchange, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/37029/difference-bet
ween-a-defect-and-a-bug-in-testing
51.​Fault, Error, and Failure, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://ece.uwaterloo.ca/~agurfink/ece653/assets/pdf/W01P2-FaultErrorFailure.pd
f
52.​Defect Prevention: Reducing Costs and Enhancing Quality - iSixSigma, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://www.isixsigma.com/software/defect-prevention-reducing-costs-and-enh
ancing-quality/
53.​Defect Rate and Reliability: Defect Rate: Define As The Number of Defects Per |
PDF - Scribd, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/53564172/SQE-Lecture-2
54.​How to calculate defect rate in software testing? - QA Touch, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.qatouch.com/ask/how-to-calculate-the-defect-rate-in-software-tes
 ting/
55.​Defect Rate: Metrics, Tools, and Strategies to Improve Quality - Axify, accessed
May 18, 2025, https://axify.io/blog/defect-rate
56.​Internal vs. External Software Quality - And How To Improve Them - Matti
Lehtinen, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://mattilehtinen.com/articles/internal-vs-external-software-quality-and-how-
to-improve-them/
57.​What is Software Quality? How to Measure and Improve it? - SixSigma.us,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-in-focus/software-quality/
58.​Measuring Software Quality using Quality Metrics | GeeksforGeeks, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/measuring-software-quality-using-quality-metric
s/
59.​Defect Density & Escape Rate: Agile Metrics Guide 2024 - Daily.dev, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://daily.dev/blog/defect-density-and-escape-rate-agile-metrics-guide-2024
60.​Defining Defect Rate and a Means of Calculating It | LinearB Blog, accessed May
18, 2025, https://linearb.io/blog/defining-defect-rate
61.​Software Review – Software Engineering | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/software-engineering-software-review/
62.​What are the types of review? - Try QA, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://tryqa.com/what-are-the-types-of-review/
63.​Types of Reviews - ISTQB Foundation - WordPress.com, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://istqbfoundation.wordpress.com/2017/09/18/types-of-reviews/
64.​How to Reduce the Cost of Quality Assurance? - PixelQA, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.pixelqa.com/blog/post/how-to-reduce-the-cost-of-quality-assuranc
e
65.​Search - ISTQB Glossary, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://glossary.istqb.org/en_US/search?term=review
66.​Methodologies of Software Technical Reviews-STRs, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.softwaretestinggenius.com/methodologies-of-software-technical-r
eviews-strs/
67.​730-214 - IEEE Standard for Software Quality Assurance.pptx - SlideShare,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/730214-ieee-standard-for-software-quality
-assurancepptx/255068184
68.​(PDF) An Introduction to software quality - ResearchGate, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250557824_An_Introduction_to_softwa
re_quality
69.​SOFTWARE QUALITY MEASUREMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROJECT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW - Journal of Theoretical and Applied
Information Technology, accessed May 18, 2025,
http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol97No3/18Vol97No3.pdf
70.​A Complete Guide to Quality Inspection - ComplianceQuest, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.compliancequest.com/what-is-quality-inspection/
71.​What is In-Process Inspection: Procedure, Stages, Types and ..., accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.3erp.com/blog/in-process-inspection/
72.​What Is Software Quality Assurance? A Step-By-Step Guide And Importance -
Blog, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://qameta.io/blog/what-is-a-software-quality-assurance/
73.​Quality Assurance (QA), Quality Control and Testing - AltexSoft, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.altexsoft.com/whitepapers/quality-assurance-quality-control-and-te
sting-the-basics-of-software-quality-management/
74.​P25070 - IEEE SA, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/25070/11906/
75.​IEEE Standard for Software Quality Assurance Plans, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.cs.utep.edu/isalamah/courses/5387/IEEE-Std-730-2002.pdf
76.​How to ensure an efficient Software Quality Management Process |
BrowserStack, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.browserstack.com/guide/efficient-software-quality-management-pr
ocess
77.​Software Quality Management Metrics - Tutorialspoint, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/software_quality_management/software_quality_
management_metrics.htm
78.​Guide to the top 20 QA metrics that matter - TestRail, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.testrail.com/blog/qa-metrics-matter/
79.​The 7 Steps of a Final Random Inspection (FRI) - HQTS, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.hqts.com/the-7-steps-of-a-final-random-inspection/
80.​Top 12 Software Quality Metrics to Measure and Why | LinearB Blog, accessed
May 18, 2025, https://linearb.io/blog/software-quality-metrics
81.​The cost of poor quality software is 2.4 trillion, while salaries paid to developers
are 1.2 trillion. Do you really believe that 99.99%, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://softwareengineeringexperiences.quora.com/The-cost-of-poor-quality-sof
tware-is-2-4-trillion-while-salaries-paid-to-developers-are-1-2-trillion-Do-you-r
eally-bel
82.​Defect Rate: A Comprehensive Overview - COO, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.coo.consulting/quality-metrics-defect-rate
83.​Essential Metrics for the QA Process - BrowserStack, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.browserstack.com/guide/essential-qa-metrics
84.​34 Software Testing Metrics And KPIs: Complete Guide 2025 | Thinksys Inc.,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://thinksys.com/qa-testing/software-testing-metrics-kpis/
85.​During Production Inspection: Ensuring Quality Control Every Step of the Way,
accessed May 18, 2025,
https://tetrainspection.com/during-production-inspection/
86.​The Importance of In-Process Inspections in Manufacturing Quality Control -,
accessed May 18, 2025,
 https://www.krtinspect.com/the-importance-of-in-process-inspections-in-manu
facturing-quality-control/
87.​Crucial Role of In Process Inspection in Manufacturing - Qodenext, accessed May
18, 2025, https://qodenext.com/blog/in-process-inspection/
88.​In-Process Inspection | KEYENCE America, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.keyence.com/products/3d-measure/cmm/applications/in-process-in
spection.jsp
89.​What is In-Process Inspection: Procedure, Stages, Types and Applications - -
Conformance1, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://conformance1.com/quality-quality-management/what-is-in-process-inspe
ction-procedure-stages-types-and-applications/
90.​What is In-Process inspection and how it works? - QDataHub, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://qdatahub.com/q-shop-data-collection-system/qshopdata/in-process-insp
ection/
91.​Executing an In-Process Inspection - SAP Learning, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://learning.sap.com/learning-journeys/applying-sap-s-4hana-quality-manag
ement/executing-an-in-process-inspection_b4829228-b4aa-488a-9237-f501620
62215
92.​www.keyence.com, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.keyence.com/products/3d-measure/cmm/applications/in-process-in
spection.jsp#:~:text=A%20visual%20in%2Dprocess%20inspection,contaminants
%20or%20not%20working%20correctly.
93.​The Ultimate Guide to Quality Inspection in Manufacturing - SixSigma.us,
accessed May 18, 2025, https://www.6sigma.us/manufacturing/quality-inspection/
94.​What Are the 4 Types of Quality Inspections in Quality Control? - HQTS, accessed
May 18, 2025,
https://www.hqts.com/what-are-the-4-types-of-quality-inspection/
95.​Final Inspection Requirements - Legacy Engineering, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://legacyengineering.com/blog/final-inspection-requirements
96.​How is product final inspection done? - Eurofins, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.eurofins.com/assurance/resources/articles/product-final-inspection/
97.​Final Inspection: Everything you need to know before shipping your goods,
accessed May 18, 2025, https://tetrainspection.com/final-inspection/
98.​What is required for a final building inspection? - Test My Home, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.testmyhome.com/blog-2/what-is-required-for-a-final-building-inspe
ction
99.​What Inspectors Look For At Final Inspection. - Elite Permits, accessed May 18,
2025,
https://www.elitepermits.com/what-inspectors-look-for-at-final-inspection/
100.​ A Beginner's Guide to Final Inspection Checklist (2024), accessed May 18,
2025, https://souffrontengineering.com/final-inspection-checklist/
101.​ Final Building Inspection: Preparation & Checklist - Procore, accessed May 18,
2025, https://www.procore.com/library/final-inspection
102.​ Inspections - City of San Antonio, accessed May 18, 2025,
https://www.sa.gov/Directory/Departments/DSD/Constructing/Business-Commer
cial/Inspections