0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Evaluation Guidelines

The evaluation guidelines outline a total of 100 marks for project assessments, with a minimum passing score of 50 marks. Evaluations include progress by the guide (30 marks), interim and final evaluations by the committee (20 and 30 marks respectively), and a project report (20 marks). The guide's evaluation focuses on aspects such as topic selection, problem definition, project objectives, scheduling, literature survey, daily logs, and individual contributions.

Uploaded by

Keerthi Prem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Evaluation Guidelines

The evaluation guidelines outline a total of 100 marks for project assessments, with a minimum passing score of 50 marks. Evaluations include progress by the guide (30 marks), interim and final evaluations by the committee (20 and 30 marks respectively), and a project report (20 marks). The guide's evaluation focuses on aspects such as topic selection, problem definition, project objectives, scheduling, literature survey, daily logs, and individual contributions.

Uploaded by

Keerthi Prem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Evaluation Guidelines & Rubrics

Total: 100 marks (Minimum required to pass: 50 marks).

 Project progress evaluation by guide: 30 Marks.


 Interim evaluation by the Evaluation Committee: 20 Marks.
 Final Evaluation by the Evaluation Committee: 30 Marks.
 Project Phase - I Report (By Evaluation Committee): 20Marks.

(The evaluation committee comprises HoD or a senior faculty member, Project coordinator

and project supervisor).

Evaluation by the Guide

The guide/supervisor shall monitor the progress being carried out by the project groups on a regular

basis. In case it is found that progress is unsatisfactory it shall be reported to the Department

Evaluation Committee for necessary action. The presence of each student in the group and their

involvement in all stages of execution of the project shall be ensured by the guide. Project
evaluation

by the guide: 30 Marks. This mark shall be awarded to the students in his/her group by considering

the following aspects:

Topic Selection: innovativeness, social relevance etc. (2)

Problem definition: Identification of the social, environmental and ethical issues of the project

problem. (2)

Purpose and need of the project: Detailed and extensive explanation of the purpose and need of

the project. (3)

Project Objectives: All objectives of the proposed work are well defined; Steps to be followed to

solve the defined problem are clearly specified. (2)

Project Scheduling & Distribution of Work among Team members: Detailed and extensive

Scheduling with timelines provided for each phase of project. Work breakdown structure well

defined. (3)

Literature survey: Outstanding investigation in all aspects. (4)

Student’s Diary/ Daily Log: The main purpose of writing daily diary is to cultivate the habit of

documenting and to encourage the students to search for details. It develops the students’ thought
process and reasoning abilities. The students should record in the daily/weekly activity diary the

day-to-day account of the observations, impressions, information gathered and suggestions given,

if any. It should contain the sketches & drawings related to the observations made by the students.

The daily/weekly activity diary shall be signed after every day/week by the guide. (7)

Individual Contribution: The contribution of each student at various stages. (7)

You might also like