Q.

1.
Q.
2. 3 SPRING
Note: Time:Hrs SEMESTER
h 9. f a. C b. a.
a k. Attempt
conforming(Q) using It
difference
the Explainthe (R)
process sample
Plan
(P) Planreject Plan acceptance results.
European normalchanging IfExplain Define
organization. ConceptConcept DisCussfunction consideredDerine
DIsCUss Distinguish anTie manufacturing
acceptable charts?
What
control What Discuss likely has
A Discuss rectification acceptance
natural Draw Which For manufacturer to
C: B: A: the
salnple is been
the There A
should
There be each
Accept Accept reliability. th e are th e lead ALL
DEPARTMENT
capability Accept of inspection, the Six-Sigma. shouldin the for tne sampling
OCbalance 30 Quality th e what the importance the
tolerance risk plan and the for quality
between size implications argued to
curves of components sampling Self sample preliminaryphiloSophical enterprise. Questions.
should inspection approaches selection situations achieving number advantages commercial
of Would 8%the the the the be and
index rejecting is receivesAssessment
Award reduced Explain level
inspection? that
for required non-conformingabove batch batch batch followed the
limits? be be size Enumerate producer' s
between scheme. of Zero? of
incorporate the Model is might decisions target the and acceptance
the of the MIN OF
high high most plans, if
two if if to
no usedaffect characteristics th e and these
Plan batches not tested:be large inspection, when points
reliable limiting definition
success than
probability
probability
between non-conforming OC MECHANICAI
appropriate or more Process
and th e be is l ife disadvantages 310
natural B calculate Three in the curve alternative
fewer batches sampling taken of cycle guality risk
both containing explain centerline selecting that best, design. number QUALITY
tolerance advantages mustTaguchi's
smaller and in of
the non-conforming
of
than possible
inand
of of to for t he product
is
accepting
risk
rejecting in the one ttightened
of reference deal be
curve consumer' level. s
them? each
heprocedures,
and control
rational selection
on definitions a
R
2%of probability componentscomponents role is the ofdefinition MANAGEMEN
limits non-conforming plans with made Method.
better, of How quality INDUSTRIAL
accepting
defective. of the OC cumulative
What of
charts. a
batchesbatches the
of to varying samples? the
and are enablers
inspection. control before product.
components Quality discuss implementing and risk. cuNe for suchfitnessas
assumptions circumstances of Compare quality
specification accepting are
considered, sample sampl i n g the
batches
containing
containing daily limits yoularger In What sum as ENGINEERING
found, andAward possible Also, Explain ofthis Quality T
components construct
and of is outgoing is charts
'conformance for
their asize and plans?
are containing are six-sigma describe better. context, the
limits. 8%2% a otherwise Model. p-chart? the Control intended SESSION
made
listed batchfound, each
decides
subsequent forap-chart?
criteria contrast disadvantage
non-confornming a lot compared
non-conformingbelow? factors Descri be
How containing is of List control
the explaln
does to
in 8% otherwiIse to program functionpurpose' Marks
Max100 2023-
found,reject which to Taguchi' s
constructing does
defective the switch use
chart. needimproves the
specifications' to
institute effect How of ie -
a otherwise entities Of
2% require impact Shewhart within is 2024
reject on among in Pareto to iav9
does What to more
and non the an loss oe Dy
an of of a
a
3 5 5 5 5
12 5 5 5 5 5 5
 Q. 3. I In tablet (nedicine) manufacture, the process parameters from 20 samples of size n=4 are:
Mean Range ( R Bar) = 91 mg, Process mean ( X double bar) = 2500 mg, USL = 2650 mg.
LSL = 2350 mg. Calculate the Cp and Cpk index and comment on the capability of the
process.
I|. If process mean (X double bar) changes to 2650 ma, and USL, LSL changes to 2750 mg and,
2250 mg respectively, what willbe the effect of the change on the capability of the process?
(D,=0.1, D,=4 98, d,=2 059, dy=2.326) 7
The reliability of individual components is shown in the figure below:
<o z
0.9 0.7 0.74 0.99
0.76 0.42
0.83

0.84

Calculate the reliability of the system. 4

Consider the assembly of four cylindrical components shown in figure below. Assume that the
length of each component is normally distributed with the means 10 cm, 8cm, 6 cm, and 4 cm
respectively for parts A, B, C, and D. The specifications for the assembly length are 28 + 0.125
cm. Assuming that the natural tolerances for all four components are equal to each other and that
the specifications barely match the natural tolerance limits; find the tolerances on the individual
Components.
A

Q.4. a The number of holes for a particular piece of knitwear is recorded for samples of size 10. The 5
results for 30 samples are shown in Table below. Set up an appropriate control chart, and discuss
whether the process is control or not? Revise the control limits, assuming special causes for the
out-of-control points.
Sample no. No. of holes Sample no. No. of holes Sample no. No. of holes
4 || 3 21
2 12 7 22
3 3 1? 23
4 14 6 24 6

5 12 15 10 25
9 16 1| 26

7 17 7 27

18 28
2
11 19
20 3 30 2
10

The power generator provide electricity or trne Tacility, i,e main and backup generator. If the main 3
generator has the reliability of 0.90 and the rellability of the system is 0.98, what is the reliability of
the backup generator?
The specification limits for the resistance of a resistor are 1000+50 ohms. A resistor with 7
resistance outside these limits Will be discarded at a cost of $0.50, A sample of 15 resistors
vielded the following observations (in ohms). 1020, 1040, 980. 1000. 980, 1000, 1010, 1000,
1030 970. 1000, 960, 990, 1040, 960. Estimate the expected loss per resistor.