Lecture 6 Chapter 5 Part 2 Big Data Storage Concepts (4)
The document discusses the ideal characteristics of storage architecture, emphasizing the trade-offs between security, data sharing, performance, and scalability. It outlines the common storage architectures: Direct-attached Storage (DAS), Storage Area Networks (SANs), and Network-attached Storage (NAS), along with a new SAN file system. Additionally, it highlights a shift towards intelligent, self-managed storage devices that require more expressive interfaces, potentially based on storage objects.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views
Lecture 6 Chapter 5 Part 2 Big Data Storage Concepts (4)
The document discusses the ideal characteristics of storage architecture, emphasizing the trade-offs between security, data sharing, performance, and scalability. It outlines the common storage architectures: Direct-attached Storage (DAS), Storage Area Networks (SANs), and Network-attached Storage (NAS), along with a new SAN file system. Additionally, it highlights a shift towards intelligent, self-managed storage devices that require more expressive interfaces, potentially based on storage objects.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
Big Data Storage Concepts
Lecture 6: Chapter 5 Part 2
Storage architecture • An ideal storage architecture would provide strong security, data sharing across platforms (i.e., operating systems), high performance, and scalability in terms of the number of devices and clients • Today’s architectures force system designers to decide which of these features is most important, as choosing an architecture involves a trade-off Storage architecture Cont. • The three storage architectures in common use today are: • Direct-attached Storage (DAS) • Storage Area Networks (SANs) • Network-attached Storage (NAS) • A fourth architecture, often called a SAN file system, has recently been introduced in an attempt to capture the features of both NAS and SANs Storage architecture Cont. I uploaded the journal article we discussed in the lecture
Mesnier, M., Ganger, G. R., & Riedel, E. (2003).
Object-based storage. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(8), 84-90 Storage today and trade -offs • The trade-off in today’s architectures is therefore security and cross-platform data sharing (files) vs. high performance (blocks) • While files allow one to securely share data between systems, the overhead imposed by a file server can limit performance. Yet, increasing file serving performance by allowing direct client access comes at the cost of security • Building a scalable, high-performance, cross-platform, secure data sharing architecture requires a new interface that provides both the direct access nature of SANs and the data sharing and security capabilities of NAS Storage today and trade –offs cont. • Recent industry and academic research suggests a shift in storage technology, in which devices evolve from relatively unintelligent and externally managed to intelligent, self-managed, and aware of the storage applications they serve. • However, creating such an intelligent device requires a more expressive interface. Many in the industry believe that an interface based on storage objects can be the answer