Drug-Receptor Interacciones
Drug-Receptor Interacciones
Interactions and
Pharmacodynamics
Joanna Peris
I. OVERVIEW
D Unoccupied receptor does not
lnfluenceintri!UIIular proc-s.
@
lular response. "Second messenger'' or effector molecules are part of the
cascade of events that translates agonist binding into a cellular response.
~~
contain muscarinic receptors that bind and respond to acetylcholine. respon•
These two receptor populations dynamically interact to control the
heart's vital functions. Signal
transduction
The magnitude of the cellular response is proportional to the num-
ber of drug-receptor complexes. This concept is conceptually similar
Figure 2.1
to the formation of complexes between enzyme and substrate and The recognition of a drug by a receptor
shares many common features, such as specificity of the receptor for triggers a biologic response.
a given agonist. Although much of this chapter centers on the inter-
action of drugs with specific receptors, it is important to know that
not all drugs exert effects by interacting with a receptor. Antacids, for
instance, chemically neutralize excess gastric acid, thereby reducing
stomach upset.
23
24 2. Drug-Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics
B. Receptor states
Receptors exist in at least two states, inactive (R) and active (R*),
that are in reversible equilibrium with one another, usually favoring the
inactive state. Binding of agonists causes the equilibrium to shift from
R to R* to produce a biologic effect. Antagonists are drugs that bind to
the receptor but do not increase the fraction of R*, instead stabilizing
the fraction of R. Some drugs (partial agonists) shift the equilibrium
from R to R*, but the fraction of R* is less than that caused by an
agonist. The magnitude of biological effect is directly related to the
fraction of R*. In summary, agonists, antagonists, and partial agonists
are examples of molecules or ligands that bind to the activation site
on the receptor and can affect the fraction of R*.
~
Changes In membrane Protein phosphorJiatlon Protein phosphorylation
potential or lonk
concentration within cell
h and altered
~ gene expression
INTRACELLULAR EFFECTS
Figure 2.2
Transmembrane signaling mechanisms. A. Ligand binds to the extracellular domain of a ligand-gated channel. B. Ligand
binds to a domain of a transmembrane receptor, which is coupled to a G protein. C. Ligand binds to the extracellular
domain of a receptor that activates a kinase enzyme. D. Lipid-soluble ligand diffuses across the membrane to interact with
its intracellular receptor. R = inactive protein.
II. Signal Transduction 25
flow across cell membranes (Figure 2.2A). The channel is usually cellular /? 0 Hormone or neuro-
space (..( tr.nsmltter
closed until the receptor is activated by an agonist, which opens
the channel for a few milliseconds. Depending on the ion con-
ducted through these channels, these receptors mediate diverse
functions, including neurotransmission and muscle contraction.
For example, stimulation of the nicotinic receptor by acetylcho-
line opens a channel that allows sodium influx and potassium
outflux across the cell membranes of neurons or muscle cells.
This change in ionic concentrations across the membrane gener-
ates an action potential in a neuron and contraction in skeletal Occupied receptor changes
and cardiac muscle. On the other hand, agonist stimulation of the
A subtype of the y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor increases
EJ shape and Interacts with
G. proUiln. G. protein rel-s
GDP and binds GYP.
chloride influx, resulting in hyperpolarization of neurons and less
chance of generating an action potential. Drug-binding sites are
also found on many voltage-gated ion channels where they can
regulate channel function. For example, local anesthetics bind to
the voltage-gated sodium channel, inhibiting sodium influx and
decreasing neuronal conduction.
Figure2.3
The recognition of chemical signals by
G protein-coupled membrane receptors
affects the activity of adenylyl cyclase.
PP1 = inorganic pyrophosphate.
26 2. Drug-Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics
Agonist drugs mimic the action of the endogenous ligand for the receptor
(for example, isoproterenol mimics norepinephrine on f3 1 receptors of the
heart). The magnitude of the drug effect depends on receptor sensitivity
to the drug and the drug concentration at the receptor site, which, in turn,
is determined by both the dose of drug administered and by the drug's
pharmacokinetic profile, such as rate of absorption, distribution, metabo-
lism, and elimination.
Figure 2.6
Desensitization of receptors.
i 100
Ill :a:
"
ii
E
]
...E
0
"at
:I
c:
."fl
II.
0
Figure 2.7
The effect of dose on the magnitude of pharmacologic response. Panel A is a linear plot. Panel B is a semilogarithmic plot
of the same data. EC50 = drug dose causing 50% of maximal response.
Ill. Dose-Response Relationships 29
~
does not alter the binding of subsequent molecules and applying the
law of mass action, we can mathematically express the relationship
.!:! 50----- Drug A--~ Drug B
between the percentage {or fraction) of bound receptors and the drug g'
concentration: 15 - - - - - - iI - - - - - Drug C
iii I I
I !
[DR] [D] Log drug concentration
=---=~--.,. {1) 0
EC~
[R1 ] Kd+[D]
EC!o EC!o
for for for
where [D] = the concentration of free drug, [DR] = the concentration Drug A Drug B Drug C
of bound drug, [R1] =the total number of receptors, and ~ = the equi-
librium dissociation constant for the drug from the receptor. The value Figure 2.8
of ~ can be used to determine the affinity of a drug for its receptor. Typical dose-response curve for drugs
Affinity describes the strength of the interaction {binding) between a showing differences in potency and
ligand and its receptor. The higher the ~ value, the weaker the inter- efficacy. EC50 = drug dose that shows
action and the lower the affinity, and vice versa. Equation {1) defines 50% of maximal response.
a curve that has the shapes shown in Figure 2.9 when plotted against
drug concentration {Panel A) or log drug concentration {Panel B). As
the concentration of free drug increases, the ratio of the concentra-
tions of bound receptors to total receptors approaches unity, thereby
producing the maximal effect. Thus, it is not surprising that the curves
shown in Figure 2.9 and those representing the relationship between
dose and effect {Figure 2.7) are similar. ~'iii'
0 ..
.. 0
D. ..
II D.
response providing the following assumptions are met: 1) The magni- ~t:.
tude of the response is proportional to the amount of receptors occu- Dose
pied by drug, 2) the Emax occurs when all receptors are bound, and 3)
one molecule of drug binds to only one molecule of receptor. In this
case,
~~
[E] [D] 0 ~
.. 0
D. ..
{2) II D.
[Emax] Kd+[D] u II
!!
'0-
! 0.5
where [E] = the effect of the drug at concentration [D] and [Emaxl = the §~
maximal effect of the drug. ~t:.
Thus, it follows that if a specific population of receptors is vital for Log dose
mediating a physiological effect, the affinity of an agonist for binding
to those receptors should be related to the potency of that drug for Figure 2.9
causing that physiological effect. Many drugs and most neurotrans- The effect of dose on the magnitude of
mitters can bind to more than one type of receptor, thereby causing drug binding.
30 2. Drug-Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics
100,000 0 10,000 0
c: 10,000 Q ,,,,
_____ I!
1000 ,,
~ 1000 ,
.!!
=a0 -............____.............____ 0 :II
=
I!
100
0'
,ff,
.c:
..
"c:
0
100
10
- ......__
... ,
A.
"a
g 10 ,,"'"'
,,"'' ~
Ill
5: 1 cf) iii
0
1
,,"'
,,' 0
U' R.,= 1,,,,
lrl 0.1
R.y=O 1&.1 0.1
Jj
100,000
,, 10,000 0
c: 1000 ,Q' 1000
0
;:; ,, I! ,,,, 0
,,
:I
.!! 1000 VI ,,,,
, "' 100 ,,,,
=a0 ,, I! ,,,,
100
,, 0 A. ,,,, 0
,,
.c: "a 10 ,,,,
"c:
e 10 0
m ,,,,
Ill
0 1
,,
,,'li 0
iii
0
"'
1 0
,,,,
U'
1&.1 0.1
R.,= 1 ,, u
1&.1 0.1 R.y=O
,,' 0 Q
0.01 0.01
" "~ "' "af"~fffff " "~
"' "af"~f#~ff
"a "a
" "a
Kct ~ Binding Kct ~ Binclng "' "a
Figure 2.10
Correlation of drug affinity for receptor binding and potency for causing a physiological effect. A positive correlation should
exist between the affinity(~ value) of a drug for binding to a specific receptor subtype and the potency (EC50 value) of
that drug to cause physiological responses mediated by that receptor population. For example, many drugs have affinity
for both a, and 13:z adrenergic receptors. The circled letters in the figure represent agonists with varying affinities for a, and
13:z receptors. However, from the data provided, it becomes clear that a, receptors only mediate changes in blood pressure,
while l3:z receptors only mediate changes in bronchodilation.
B. Partial agonists
Partial agonists have intrinsic activities greater than zero but less than
one (Figure 2.11 ). Even when all the receptors are occupied, partial Inverse agonists produce
a response below the base-
agonists cannot produce the same Emax as a full agonist. Even so, a line response measured
partial agonist may have an affinity that is greater than, less than, in the absence of drug.
or equivalent to that of a full agonist. A partial agonist may also act
as a partial antagonist of a full agonist (Figure 2.12). As the number In this example, a portion of the
receptors show constitutive
of receptors occupied by the partial agonist increases, the number activity (without stimulation),
of receptors that can be occupied by the full agonist decreases and such that 12% of maximal
response is seen.
therefore Emax would decrease until it reached the Emax of the partial
agonist. This potential of partial agonists to act as both an agonist
and antagonist may have therapeutic utility. For example, aripiprazole, Figure 2.11
an atypical antipsychotic, is a partial agonist at selected dopamine Effects of full agonists, partial agonists,
receptors. Overactive dopaminergic pathways tend to be inhibited and inverse agonists on receptor activity.
by aripiprazole, whereas underactive pathways are stimulated. This
might explain the ability of aripiprazole to improve symptoms of
schizophrenia, with a small risk of causing extrapyramidal adverse
effects (see Chapter 11 ).
C. Inverse agonists
Typically, unbound receptors are inactive and require interaction with
an agonist to assume an active conformation. However, some recep-
tors show a spontaneous conversion from R to R* in the absence of
an agonist. Inverse agonists, unlike full agonists, stabilize the inac-
tive R form and cause R* to convert to R. This decreases the num-
ber of activated receptors to below that observed in the absence of
drug (Figure 2.11 ). Thus, inverse agonists have an intrinsic activity
less than zero, reverse the activation state of receptors, and exert the
opposite pharmacological effect of agonists.
32 2. Drug-Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics
Fullagonist • D. Antagonists
Key:
Partlalagonlst
Fully active receptor + + Antagonists bind to a receptor with high affinity but possess zero
intrinsic activity. An antagonist has no effect on biological function in
the absence of an agonist, but can decrease the effect of an agonist
when present. Antagonism may occur either by blocking the drug's
Partially active receptor ~
ability to bind to the receptor or by blocking its ability to activate the
receptor.
++++
High levels of agonist may activate
all rac:eptors and produce unwantad
1. Competitive antagonists: If the antagonist binds to the same site
on the receptor as the agonist in a reversible manner, it is "com-
petitive!' A competitive antagonist interferes with an agonist bind-
ing to its receptor and maintains the receptor in its inactive state.
overstlmulatlon.
For example, the antihypertensive drug terazosin competes with
the endogenous ligand norepinephrine at a1-adrenoceptors, thus
decreasing vascular smooth muscle tone and reducing blood pres-
sure. However, increasing the concentration of agonist relative to
The presence of partial antagonist can overcome this inhibition. Thus, competitive antago-
agonist displaces some nists characteristically shift the agonist dose-response curve to the
agonist. resulting In right (increased EC50) without affecting Emax (Figure 2.13).
diminished receptor
response.
2. Irreversible antagonists: Irreversible antagonists bind cova-
lently to the active site of the receptor, thereby permanently
reducing the number of receptors available to the agonist. An
irreversible antagonist causes a downward shift of the Emax.
with no shift of EC50 values (Figure 2.13). In contrast to com-
petitive antagonists, addition of more agonist does not over-
come the effect of irreversible antagonists. Thus, irreversible
antagonists and allosteric antagonists (see below) are both
considered noncompetitive antagonists. A fundamental differ-
ence between competitive and noncompetitive antagonists is
that competitive antagonists reduce agonist potency (increase
EC50) and noncompetitive antagonists reduce agonist efficacy
(decrease Emax).
Tl = TD50 I ED50
n Warfarin: Small
The Tl is a measure of a drug's safety, because a larger value indi-
W therapeutic index
cates a wide margin between doses that are effective and doses that
are toxic.
Study Questions