0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

inspire_dataspecification_ac-mf_v3.0

The document outlines the INSPIRE Data Specification for Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features, providing technical guidelines for implementation under the INSPIRE Directive. It emphasizes the need for interoperability of spatial data across Europe and includes recommendations for data management and sharing. The document also identifies key use cases for meteorological data, focusing on environmental emergency response, flood forecasting, and climate assessment.

Uploaded by

lw53813963
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

inspire_dataspecification_ac-mf_v3.0

The document outlines the INSPIRE Data Specification for Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features, providing technical guidelines for implementation under the INSPIRE Directive. It emphasizes the need for interoperability of spatial data across Europe and includes recommendations for data management and sharing. The document also identifies key use cases for meteorological data, focusing on environmental emergency response, flood forecasting, and climate assessment.

Uploaded by

lw53813963
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 174

INSPIRE

Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe

D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions


and Meteorological Geographical Features –
Technical Guidelines

Title D2.8.III.13-14 INSPIRE Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and


Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines
Creator INSPIRE Thematic Working Group Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features
Date 2013-12-10
Subject INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features
Publisher European Commission Joint Research Centre
Type Text
Description This document describes the INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme
Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features
Contributor Members of the INSPIRE Thematic Working Group Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features

Format Portable Document Format (pdf)


Source
Rights Public
Identifier D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
Language En
Relation Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007
establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community
(INSPIRE)
Coverage Project duration
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page II
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Foreword
How to read the document?
This document describes the “INSPIRE data specification on Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines” version 3.0 as developed by the
Thematic Working Group (TWG) AC-MF using both natural and a conceptual schema language.
1
The data specification is based on a common template used for all data specifications, which has
been harmonised using the experience from the development of the Annex I, II and III data
specifications.

This document provides guidelines for the implementation of the provisions laid down in the
Implementing Rule for spatial data sets and services of the INSPIRE Directive. It also includes
additional requirements and recommendations that, although not included in the Implementing Rule,
are relevant to guarantee or to increase data interoperability.

Two executive summaries provide a quick overview of the INSPIRE data specification process in
general, and the content of the data specification on Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features in particular. We highly recommend that managers, decision makers, and all
those new to the INSPIRE process and/or information modelling should read these executive
summaries first.

The UML diagrams (in Chapter 5) offer a rapid way to see the main elements of the specifications and
their relationships. The definition of the spatial object types, attributes, and relationships are included
in the Feature Catalogue (also in Chapter 5). People having thematic expertise but not familiar with
UML can fully understand the content of the data model focusing on the Feature Catalogue. Users
might also find the Feature Catalogue especially useful to check if it contains the data necessary for
the applications that they run. The technical details are expected to be of prime interest to those
organisations that are responsible for implementing INSPIRE within the field of Atmospheric
Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features, but also to other stakeholders and users of the
spatial data infrastructure.

The technical provisions and the underlying concepts are often illustrated by examples. Smaller
examples are within the text of the specification, while longer explanatory examples and descriptions
of selected use cases are attached in the annexes.

In order to distinguish the INSPIRE spatial data themes from the spatial object types, the INSPIRE
spatial data themes are written in italics.

The document will be publicly available as a ‗non-paper‘. It does not represent an official position of
the European Commission, and as such cannot be invoked in the context of legal procedures.

Legal Notice

Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible
for the use which might be made of this publication.

1
The common document template is available in the ―Framework documents‖ section of the data
specifications web page at http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/2
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page III
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services –


General Executive Summary
The challenges regarding the lack of availability, quality, organisation, accessibility, and sharing of
spatial information are common to a large number of policies and activities and are experienced
across the various levels of public authority in Europe. In order to solve these problems it is necessary
to take measures of coordination between the users and providers of spatial information. The Directive
2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council adopted on 14 March 2007 aims at
establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) for
environmental policies, or policies and activities that have an impact on the environment.

INSPIRE is based on the infrastructures for spatial information that are created and maintained by the
Member States. To support the establishment of a European infrastructure, Implementing Rules
addressing the following components of the infrastructure have been specified: metadata,
interoperability of spatial data sets (as described in Annexes I, II, III of the Directive) and spatial data
services, network services, data and service sharing, and monitoring and reporting procedures.
2
INSPIRE does not require collection of new data. However, after the period specified in the Directive
Member States have to make their data available according to the Implementing Rules.

Interoperability in INSPIRE means the possibility to combine spatial data and services from different
sources across the European Community in a consistent way without involving specific efforts of
humans or machines. It is important to note that ―interoperability‖ is understood as providing access to
spatial data sets through network services, typically via Internet. Interoperability may be achieved by
either changing (harmonising) and storing existing data sets or transforming them via services for
publication in the INSPIRE infrastructure. It is expected that users will spend less time and efforts on
understanding and integrating data when they build their applications based on data delivered in
accordance with INSPIRE.

In order to benefit from the endeavours of international standardisation bodies and organisations
established under international law their standards and technical means have been utilised and
referenced, whenever possible.

To facilitate the implementation of INSPIRE, it is important that all stakeholders have the opportunity
to participate in specification and development. For this reason, the Commission has put in place a
consensus building process involving data users, and providers together with representatives of
industry, research and government. These stakeholders, organised through Spatial Data Interest
3
Communities (SDIC) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMO) , have provided reference materials,
4
participated in the user requirement and technical surveys, proposed experts for the Data
5 6
Specification Drafting Team , the Thematic Working Groups and other ad-hoc cross-thematic

2
For all 34 Annex I,II and III data themes: within two years of the adoption of the corresponding
Implementing Rules for newly collected and extensively restructured data and within 5 years for other
data in electronic format still in use
3
The current status of registered SDICs/LMOs is available via INSPIRE website:
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/42
4
Surveys on unique identifiers and usage of the elements of the spatial and temporal schema,
5
The Data Specification Drafting Team has been composed of experts from Austria, Belgium, Czech
Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, UK, and the
European Environment Agency
6
The Thematic Working Groups have been composed of experts from Austria, Australia, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK,
the European Environment Agency and the European Commission.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page IV
and Meteorological Geographical Features

technical groups and participated in the public stakeholder consultations on draft versions of the data
specifications. These consultations covered expert reviews as well as feasibility and fitness-for-
7
purpose testing of the data specifications .

This open and participatory approach was successfully used during the development of the data
specifications on Annex I, II and III data themes as well as during the preparation of the Implementing
8
Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services for Annex I spatial data themes and of its
amendment regarding the themes of Annex II and III.

The development framework elaborated by the Data Specification Drafting Team aims at keeping the
data specifications of the different themes coherent. It summarises the methodology to be used for the
development of the data specifications, providing a coherent set of requirements and
recommendations to achieve interoperability. The pillars of the framework are the following technical
9
documents :

 The Definition of Annex Themes and Scope describes in greater detail the spatial data
themes defined in the Directive, and thus provides a sound starting point for the thematic
aspects of the data specification development.

 The Generic Conceptual Model defines the elements necessary for interoperability and
data harmonisation including cross-theme issues. It specifies requirements and
recommendations with regard to data specification elements of common use, like the
spatial and temporal schema, unique identifier management, object referencing, some
common code lists, etc. Those requirements of the Generic Conceptual Model that are
directly implementable are included in the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial
Data Sets and Services.

 The Methodology for the Development of Data Specifications defines a repeatable


methodology. It describes how to arrive from user requirements to a data specification
through a number of steps including use-case development, initial specification
development and analysis of analogies and gaps for further specification refinement.

 The Guidelines for the Encoding of Spatial Data defines how geographic information can
be encoded to enable transfer processes between the systems of the data providers in
the Member States. Even though it does not specify a mandatory encoding rule it sets
GML (ISO 19136) as the default encoding for INSPIRE.

 The Guidelines for the use of Observations & Measurements and Sensor Web
Enablement-related standards in INSPIRE Annex II and III data specification development
provides guidelines on how the ―Observations and Measurements‖ standard (ISO 19156)
is to be used within INSPIRE.

 The Common data models are a set of documents that specify data models that are
referenced by a number of different data specifications. These documents include generic
data models for networks, coverages and activity complexes.

The structure of the data specifications is based on the ―ISO 19131 Geographic information - Data
product specifications‖ standard. They include the technical documentation of the application schema,

7
For Annex II+III, the consultation and testing phase lasted from 20 June to 21 October 2011.
8
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services, published in
th
the Official Journal of the European Union on 8 of December 2010.
9
The framework documents are available in the ―Framework documents‖ section of the data
specifications web page at http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/2
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page V
and Meteorological Geographical Features

the spatial object types with their properties, and other specifics of the spatial data themes using
10
natural language as well as a formal conceptual schema language .

A consolidated model repository, feature concept dictionary, and glossary are being maintained to
support the consistent specification development and potential further reuse of specification elements.
The consolidated model consists of the harmonised models of the relevant standards from the ISO
11
19100 series, the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model, and the application schemas developed for
each spatial data theme. The multilingual INSPIRE Feature Concept Dictionary contains the definition
and description of the INSPIRE themes together with the definition of the spatial object types present
in the specification. The INSPIRE Glossary defines all the terms (beyond the spatial object types)
necessary for understanding the INSPIRE documentation including the terminology of other
components (metadata, network services, data sharing, and monitoring).

By listing a number of requirements and making the necessary recommendations, the data
specifications enable full system interoperability across the Member States, within the scope of the
application areas targeted by the Directive. The data specifications (in their version 3.0) are published
as technical guidelines and provide the basis for the content of the Implementing Rule on
12
Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services . The content of the Implementing Rule is extracted
from the data specifications, considering short- and medium-term feasibility as well as cost-benefit
considerations. The requirements included in the Implementing Rule are legally binding for the
Member States according to the timeline specified in the INSPIRE Directive.

In addition to providing a basis for the interoperability of spatial data in INSPIRE, the data specification
development framework and the thematic data specifications can be reused in other environments at
local, regional, national and global level contributing to improvements in the coherence and
interoperability of data in spatial data infrastructures.

10
UML – Unified Modelling Language
11
Conceptual models related to specific areas (e.g. INSPIRE themes)
12
In the case of the Annex II+III data specifications, the extracted requirements are used to formulate
an amendment to the existing Implementing Rule.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page VI
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical


Features – Executive Summary
The Thematic Working Group responsible for the specification development of Atmospheric Conditions
and Meteorological Geographical Features was composed of ten experts coming from Austria,
Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the
European Commission.

The two themes are defined by the INSPIRE Directive as:


 Atmospheric conditions: physical conditions in the atmosphere. Includes spatial data based on
measurements, on models or on a combination thereof and includes measurements locations;
 Meteorological geographical features: weather conditions and their measurements:
precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration, wind speed and direction.

The distinction between these two themes gave rise to many unanswered questions, and no criteria
could be found to make it operational. Therefore, the TWG decided that the most efficient way of
covering the two themes was to address ―Atmospheric Conditions‖ and ―Meteorological Features‖
together, and to check later on that no problem emerged in doing so with respect to the identified Use
Cases and other questions raised during the commenting period on version 2.

This did appear to be the case, so the merging of the two themes into one theme labelled
―Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Features‖ is recommended.

Use cases
In order to identify priority areas for the specification of meteorological data, the TWG selected the
following three high level use cases:
1. Use of meteorology in support of environmental emergency response
2. Flood forecasting
3. Climate assessment (with past or predicted data).

These cases were selected after reviewing a list of use cases considered for conceptual modelling by
the OGC Met Ocean Domain Working Group. It was felt that they were all highly relevant to
environmental protection, and that they would all require significant and possibly challenging cross
boundary as well as cross theme cooperation.

A close examination of the stated User Requirements had been carried out as well.

Five detailed use cases have been developed, involving the use of both real time and non real time
data.

The scope
According to the INSPIRE Directive the data relevant to the themes ―Atmospheric Conditions‖ and
―Meteorological Geographical Features‖ should provide sufficient information for the users to assess,
at least, precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration and wind at their location of interest. General
information on physical conditions should also be made available, however, neither the Directive nor
any of the subsequent documents give any operative guidance regarding the range that this
information should cover: questions such as the inclusion of forecast data, the list of parameters, the
spatial resolution of the data, are not addressed.

After reviewing in detail the available documents on these issues, the TWG considered that there was
no a priori reason to exclude any type of meteorological information from the overall scope of the
themes on Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features. It could possibly be
argued that real time and short-range forecast data is not needed strictly speaking for protecting the
environment but only for ensuring security. However, as the example of GMES is showing, there is no
clear limit between these two fields of activity, and it is highly likely that they will eventually be
combined into a common framework.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page VII
and Meteorological Geographical Features

It should however be noted that the volume of data created, exchanged and archived by national
meteorological centres in Europe is huge (multi-terabytes production per day, multi-gigabyte exchange
per day and multi-petabyte archives). These resources are not primarily shared using the Internet, but
through high capacity dedicated links, and it is only once the data have been moderated and
summarised into much smaller information products which users can handle using common internet
tools that they should be made available through INSPIRE service.

Therefore a phased approach is recommended to make it possible to progressively integrate an


increasing variety of data into the INSPIRE framework.
 For the first implementation a basic data set following as closely as possible the text of the
Directive is required as a mandatory minimum,
 In addition to this basic set a recommended data set is defined. This data set could become
mandatory later on at a further stage of the INSPIRE development, but SDIC and LMOs are
encouraged to implement it, resources permitting, without waiting for this stage.
 Most importantly the present data specifications have been developed so as not to exclude any
type of atmospheric data including air quality data. Therefore they can be used from the start
by any operator willing to integrate its data into the interoperable environment defined for
INSPIRE and to make users benefit from it.‖
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page VIII
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Acknowledgements
Many individuals and organisations have contributed to the development of these Guidelines.

The Thematic Working Group Atmospheric conditions and Meteorological geographical features
(TWG-AC-MF) included:
Bernard Strauss (TWG Facilitator), Spiros Ventouras (TWG Editor), Sheila Cryan, Esa Falkenroth,
Frédéric Guillaud, Stefano Nativi, Erwin Petz, Ilkka Rinne, Martin Schultz, Raymond Sluiter, Aasmund
Vik, Bruce Wright, Alessandro Sarretta (European Commission contact point till May 2012), Tomáš
Řezník (European Commission contact point from May till August 2012), Michael Lutz (European
Commission contact point from August 2012), Vlado Cetl (European Commission contact point from
August 2012).

Other contributors to the INSPIRE data specifications are the Drafting Team Data Specifications, the
JRC Data Specifications Team and the INSPIRE stakeholders - Spatial Data Interested Communities
(SDICs) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMOs).

Contact information
Maria Vanda Nunes de Lima
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Institute for Environment and Sustainability
Unit H06: Digital Earth and Reference Data
TP262, Via Fermi 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA)
ITALY
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel.: +39-0332-7865052
Fax: +39-0332-7866325
http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page IX
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Table of contents
1 Scope .............................................................................................................................................. 1

2 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Name ......................................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Informal description ................................................................................................................... 1
2.2.1 Definition of the mandatory and recommended data sets ................................................. 3
2.3 Normative References .............................................................................................................. 5
2.4 Terms and definitions ................................................................................................................ 7
2.5 Symbols and abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 7
2.6 How the Technical Guidelines map to the Implementing Rules ............................................... 7
2.6.1 Requirements..................................................................................................................... 8
2.6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 9
2.6.3 Conformance ..................................................................................................................... 9
3 Specification scopes ....................................................................................................................... 9

4 Identification information ................................................................................................................. 9

5 Data content and structure ........................................................................................................... 10


5.1 Application schemas – Overview ............................................................................................ 10
5.1.1 Application schemas included in the IRs ......................................................................... 10
5.1.2 Additional recommended application schemas ............................................................... 11
5.2 Basic notions ........................................................................................................................... 11
5.2.1 Notation ............................................................................................................................ 11
5.2.2 Voidable characteristics ................................................................................................... 13
5.2.3 Enumerations ................................................................................................................... 14
5.2.4 Code lists ......................................................................................................................... 14
5.2.5 Identifier management ..................................................................................................... 17
5.2.6 Geometry representation ................................................................................................. 18
5.2.7 Temporality representation .............................................................................................. 18
5.2.8 Coverages ........................................................................................................................ 19
5.3 Application schema Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features .... 20
5.3.1 Description ....................................................................................................................... 20
5.3.2 Feature catalogue ............................................................................................................ 29
5.3.3 Externally governed code lists ......................................................................................... 30
6 Reference systems, units of measure and grids .......................................................................... 32
6.1 Default reference systems, units of measure and grid ........................................................... 32
6.1.1 Coordinate reference systems ......................................................................................... 32
6.1.2 Temporal reference system ............................................................................................. 35
6.1.3 Units of measure .............................................................................................................. 35
6.1.4 Grids ................................................................................................................................ 35
6.2 Theme-specific requirements and recommendations ............................................................. 36
6.2.1 Coordinate reference systems ......................................................................................... 36
6.2.2 Grids ................................................................................................................................ 37
7 Data quality ................................................................................................................................... 37
7.1 WMO operational quality procedures...................................................................................... 38
7.2 WMO regulations on data quality ............................................................................................ 39
7.3 Quality recommendation ......................................................................................................... 40
7.4 Data quality elements.............................................................................................................. 40
7.4.1 Logical consistency – Conceptual consistency ............................................................... 41
7.4.2 Logical consistency – Domain consistency ..................................................................... 41
7.5 Minimum data quality requirements ........................................................................................ 42
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page X
and Meteorological Geographical Features

7.6 Recommendation on data quality ........................................................................................... 42


8 Dataset-level metadata ................................................................................................................. 42
8.1 Metadata elements defined in INSPIRE Metadata Regulation ............................................... 42
8.1.1 Conformity........................................................................................................................ 43
8.1.2 Lineage ............................................................................................................................ 46
8.1.3 Temporal reference ......................................................................................................... 46
8.2 Metadata elements for interoperability .................................................................................... 47
8.2.1 Coordinate Reference System ......................................................................................... 48
8.2.2 Temporal Reference System ........................................................................................... 48
8.2.3 Encoding .......................................................................................................................... 49
8.2.4 Character Encoding ......................................................................................................... 50
8.2.5 Spatial representation type .............................................................................................. 50
8.2.6 Data Quality – Logical Consistency – Topological Consistency ...................................... 51
8.3 Recommended theme-specific metadata elements ................................................................ 51
8.3.1 Maintenance Information ................................................................................................. 51
8.3.2 Metadata elements for reporting data quality .................................................................. 52
9 Delivery ......................................................................................................................................... 54
9.1 Updates ................................................................................................................................... 54
9.2 Delivery medium ..................................................................................................................... 54
9.3 Encodings ............................................................................................................................... 55
9.3.1 Default Encoding(s) ......................................................................................................... 58
9.3.2 Recommended Encoding(s) ............................................................................................ 59
9.4 Options for delivering coverage data ...................................................................................... 59
10 Data Capture................................................................................................................................. 60

11 Portrayal ........................................................................................................................................ 60
11.1 Layers to be provided by INSPIRE view services ............................................................... 61
11.1.1 Layers organisation ...................................................................................................... 65
11.2 Styles required to be supported by INSPIRE view services ............................................... 65
Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................... 66

Annex A (normative) Abstract Test Suite ............................................................................................. 67


A.1 Application Schema Conformance Class ............................................................................... 70
A.1.1 Schema element denomination test ................................................................................ 70
A.1.2 Value type test ................................................................................................................. 70
A.1.3 Value test ......................................................................................................................... 70
A.1.4 Attributes/associations completeness test ....................................................................... 71
A.1.5 Abstract spatial object test ............................................................................................... 71
A.1.6 Constraints test ................................................................................................................ 71
A.1.7 Geometry representation test .......................................................................................... 72
A.2 Reference Systems Conformance Class ................................................................................ 72
A.2.1 Datum test........................................................................................................................ 72
A.2.2 Coordinate reference system test .................................................................................... 72
A.2.3 Grid test ........................................................................................................................... 73
A.2.4 View service coordinate reference system test ............................................................... 73
A.2.5 Temporal reference system test ...................................................................................... 74
A.2.6 Units of measurements test ............................................................................................. 74
A.3 Data Consistency Conformance Class ................................................................................... 74
A.3.1 Unique identifier persistency test ..................................................................................... 74
A.3.2 Version consistency test .................................................................................................. 75
A.3.3 Life cycle time sequence test........................................................................................... 75
A.3.4 Validity time sequence test .............................................................................................. 75
A.3.5 Update frequency test ...................................................................................................... 76
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page XI
and Meteorological Geographical Features

A.3.6 Observed property identifier test...................................................................................... 76


A.4 Metadata IR Conformance Class ............................................................................................ 76
A.4.1 Metadata for interoperability test ..................................................................................... 76
A.5 Information Accessibility Conformance Class ......................................................................... 76
A.5.1 Code list publication test .................................................................................................. 77
A.5.2 CRS publication test ........................................................................................................ 77
A.5.3 CRS identification test ..................................................................................................... 77
A.5.4 Grid identification test ...................................................................................................... 77
A.6 Data Delivery Conformance Class .......................................................................................... 78
A.6.1 Encoding compliance test ................................................................................................ 78
A.6.2 Specialised Observations types test ................................................................................ 78
A.7 Technical Guideline Conformance Class ................................................................................ 79
A.7.1 Multiplicity test.................................................................................................................. 79
A.7.2 CRS http URI test ............................................................................................................ 79
A.7.3 Metadata encoding schema validation test ..................................................................... 79
A.7.4 Metadata occurrence test ................................................................................................ 79
A.7.5 Metadata consistency test ............................................................................................... 80
A.7.6 Encoding schema validation test ..................................................................................... 80
A.7.7 Coverage multipart representation test ........................................................................... 80
A.7.8 Coverage domain consistency test .................................................................................. 80
A.7.9 JPEG 2000 conformity test .............................................................................................. 81
A.7.10 Style test ....................................................................................................................... 81
Annex B (informative) Use cases .......................................................................................................... 82
B.1 Use Case 1 - Plume Prediction in Support of Emergency Response ..................................... 84
B.2 Use Case 2.1 - Flash flood management ............................................................................... 97
B.3 Use Case 2.2 – Flood forecasting short and medium range ................................................ 105
B.4 Use Case 3.1 - Finding the most interesting locations for new wind farms .......................... 109
B.5 Use Case 3.2 - Climate Impacts ........................................................................................... 115
B.6 Reporting and exchanging of Air Quality data under 2011/850/EU ...................................... 127
Annex C (normative) Code list values ................................................................................................. 147

Annex D (informative) Temporal Aspects ........................................................................................... 148

Annex E (informative) Mandated and recommended parameter mappings to GRIB Descriptions & CF
Standard Names .................................................................................................................................. 152

Annex F (informative) Binary encoding formats typically used for the result grid coverage data of
meteorological and atmospheric data sets .......................................................................................... 153
F.1 WMO GRidded Binary (GRIB) .............................................................................................. 153
F.2 Binary Universal Form for the Representation of meteorological data (BUFR) .................... 153
F.3 Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) ............................................................................... 154
Annex G (informative) Example of a WMS 1.3 GetCapabilities response with INSPIRE extended
capabilities & AC-MF layer identification ............................................................................................. 155

Annex H (informative) Reasoning for Inclusion and Exclusion of Meteorological Satellite Data and
Imagery Within Specific INSPIRE Themes ......................................................................................... 160

Annex I (informative) Code list interoperability .................................................................................... 162


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 1
and Meteorological Geographical Features

1 Scope
This document specifies a harmonised data specification for the spatial data theme Atmospheric
Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features as defined in Annex III of the INSPIRE
Directive.

This data specification provides the basis for the drafting of Implementing Rules according to Article 7
(1) of the INSPIRE Directive [Directive 2007/2/EC]. The entire data specification is published as
implementation guidelines accompanying these Implementing Rules.

2 Overview

2.1 Name
INSPIRE data specification for the theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features.

2.2 Informal description

Definition:
Theme III-13, Atmospheric Conditions:
Physical conditions in the atmosphere. Includes spatial data based on measurements, on models or
on a combination thereof and includes measurements locations. [Directive 2007/2/EC]

Theme III-14, Meteorological Geographical Features:


Weather conditions and their measurements: precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration, wind
speed and direction. [Directive 2007/2/EC]

Description:
A very wide range of activities related to environmental protection require input information on
meteorological conditions. Meteorological and related data (land /ocean surface conditions, etc.) held
operationally within the European Meteorological Infrastructure (EMI, comprising the national
meteorological services collaborating through EUMETNET and the two European organisations
ECMWF and EUMETSAT which also report to the national meteorological services) include data on:
 Wind and turbulence
o Wind vector
o Wind gust and turbulence
o Wind shear
 Temperature
o air
o ground
 Hydrological elements
o Humidity
o Soil moisture
o Snowdepth
o Evaporation
o Rainfall / water equivalent of snow (accumulated and rate of)
 Radiation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 2
and Meteorological Geographical Features

o Long- and short- wave radiation


o Sunshine duration
o Surface albedo
 Observed phenomena
o Visibility
o Weather
o Cloud cover
o Ice deposit

available as climatogical estimates, actual measured values, and for most of them forecast values at
various time ranges.
Similarly a large variety of air quality related data is available at a number of services throughout
Europe.

The overall volume of data is huge. There are several centres in Europe that archive multi-terabytes of
meteorological/oceanographic/climatological model data every day, and a substantial part of this is
shared between centres and users who can handle data on this massive scale. Globally observed
data received at nearly all meteorological centres is Europe is similarly multi-gigabyte in volume. Such
resources are not primarily shared using the Internet, but through high capacity dedicated links. For
public data access, the data is moderated and summarised into much smaller information products
which users can handle using common internet tools.

The derogation in Article 14.2 of the Directive:


"Member States may allow a public authority supplying a service referred to in point (b) of Article
11(1)"
which refers to "View Services":
"…to apply charges where such charges secure the maintenance of spatial data sets and
corresponding data services, especially in cases involving very large volumes of frequently updated
data."
is intended to apply to View Services from Meteorological Centres. Every layer (or "field") of a
numerical model of different parameters, levels in the vertical and at different times in the future is
capable of being treated through a view service as a "map of the atmosphere". While geographic
centres may hold a few maps where a view service applies, for meteorological centres, taking into
account the number of layers in a numerical model, models of the atmosphere, stratosphere, ocean
surface and ocean depths, the number of times a model is run, intermediate runs, ensembles and runs
from derived or embedded models which each meteorological centre uses to focus on its regions of
interest – but NOT including climate model runs – it is conservatively estimated that there are 100,000
new "maps of the atmosphere" produced daily across Europe.

Considering the Use Cases presented in Annex B it can be said that the whole of this data is
potentially useful with respect to achieving the objectives of the INSPIRE Directive. Therefore, a
phased approach has been defined where data can be progressively integrated into the INSPIRE
framework.
 For the first implementation a basic data set following as closely as possible the text of the
Directive is required as a mandatory minimum,
 In addition to this basic set a recommended data set is defined to better match the needs of the
identified Use Cases; this data set, or part of it, could become mandatory later on at a further
stage of the INSPIRE development, but SDIC and LMOs are encouraged to implement it,
resources permitting, without waiting for this stage.
 Most importantly the present data specifications have been developed so as not to exclude any
type of atmospheric data including air quality data. Therefore they can be used from the start
by any operator willing to integrate its data into the interoperable environment defined for
INSPIRE and to make users benefit from it.
For all types of data only the final processed form of the data may fall within scope; interim results of
any processing chain are explicitly excluded from scope.

Many aviation meteorological data products are defined in aviation regulations which are maintained
jointly by ICAO and WMO (both recognised by ISO as standards bodies); these are currently excluded
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 3
and Meteorological Geographical Features

from the scope of AC-MF. However, if meteorological elements required by INSPIRE extend up into
the atmosphere, they will naturally impinge on aviation regulations. Data modelling for INSPIRE, as it
expands should avoid conflicting with these aviation regulations.

With respect to the distinction between the two themes ―Atmospheric Conditions‖ and ―Meteorological
Geographical Features‖, no criteria could be found to make it operational, so the version 2 of the data
specification document was prepared to cover both themes in one document. It appeared that this did
not cause any difficulty with the user needs expressed through the identified Use Cases nor with any
of the issues raised during the commenting period on version 2. Therefore, the merging of the two
themes into one theme labelled ―Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features‖
has been proposed and the present version of the data specification document is provided under this
label only.

2.2.1 Definition of the mandatory and recommended data sets

Recommendation 1 The data made available should include, but not be limited to, the following
parameters, spatial coverage and resolution, temporal coverage and
resolution.

List of mandatory parameters


 wind speed and direction
 temperature
 relative humidity
 evaporation amount
 precipitation amount

Spatial coverage and resolution


 Data observed at the Regional Basic Synoptic Network (RBSN), which is a WMO-managed
observing network aiming at assisting in defining the state of the atmosphere at least on a
scale of the order of 200 km in the horizontal and six to 12 hours in time (ref. WMO Resolution
40, Cg XII).

Temporal coverage and resolution


 Past and present data as available
 Wind, temperature and humidity: 6-hourly data
 Evaporation and precipitation: daily data, 24-hour accumulated

List of recommended parameters


Meteorological data
 wind speed and direction
 wind gust speed
 temperature
 relative humidity
 evaporation amount
 precipitation amount
 precipitation rate
 precipitation type
 total snow depth
 pressure reduced to mean sea level
 total cloud cover
 visibility
 global solar radiation
 long-wave radiation
 short-wave radiation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 4
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Products derived from meteorological satellite data at level 3 or higher (variables mapped on uniform
13
space-time grid scales) , which are measures of atmospheric properties (e.g. cloud cover) are
considered to be in scope. Satellite positioning and pre-processing information, and level 2 and lower
data are excluded from scope. Further background information can be found in informative Annex G.

- Temporal coverage and resolution


o Coverage: past, present and forecast data. Past data include climatological information,
e.g. monthly means, extremes etc. Forecast data include climate information from
numerical simulations
Only the latest real-time weather forecast is considered in scope, as it provides on average the best
prediction of the weather. However, hindcasts (non-real-time simulations of atmospheric conditions)
may fall within scope
For climate projections, only long-term time-means are considered to be in scope; data at a high
temporal resolution is excluded
o Resolution: in line with the current practice in operational meteorology
- Spatial coverage and resolution
o In line with the current practice in operational meteorology. For past and present
information the use of numerical modelling output is strongly encouraged to overcome the
limitation of the observing networks.
Air quality data
Air quality date whose monitoring is required under Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC is
recommended for inclusion. The list of parameters is shown in the informative Annex H.

Products out of scope


The following products are excluded from scope for both mandatory and recommended parameters:
 Offline archives stored on tape.
 Partially-processed information
 Observational calibration information
 Intermediate forecast runs
 Model diagnostic data
 3rd Party data
 Non-operational data
 Research data

Definition:
Theme III-13, Atmospheric Conditions:
Physical conditions in the atmosphere. Includes spatial data based on measurements, on models or
on a combination thereof and includes measurements locations. [Directive 2007/2/EC]

Theme III-14, Meteorological Geographical Features:


Weather conditions and their measurements: precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration, wind
speed and direction. [Directive 2007/2/EC]

Description:
The INSPIRE themes ―Atmospheric Conditions‖ and ―Meteorological Geographical Features‖ are
covered together in one Data specification. These themes provide basic concepts and data models for
environmental protection related activities requiring information on atmospheric conditions like
weather, climate and air quality.

Entry in the INSPIRE registry: http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/ac/

13
For full definition of satellite processing levels, see for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_sensing#Data_processing_levels
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 5
and Meteorological Geographical Features

2.3 Normative References

[Directive 2007/2/EC] Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March
2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European
Community (INSPIRE)

[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic Information – Spatial Schema

[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema

[ISO 19108-c] ISO 19108:2002/Cor 1:2006, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema, Technical
Corrigendum 1

[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO
19111:2007)

[ISO 19113] EN ISO 19113:2005, Geographic Information – Quality principles

[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)

[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)

[ISO 19123] EN ISO 19123:2007, Geographic Information – Schema for coverage geometry and
functions

[ISO 19125-1] EN ISO 19125-1:2004, Geographic Information – Simple feature access – Part 1:
Common architecture

[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO
19135:2005)

[ISO 19138] ISO/TS 19138:2006, Geographic Information – Data quality measures

[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema


implementation

[ISO 19157] ISO/DIS 19157, Geographic information – Data quality

[OGC 06-103r4] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access –
Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.1

NOTE This is an updated version of "EN ISO 19125-1:2004, Geographic


information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture".

[Regulation 1205/2008/EC] Regulation 1205/2008/EC implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the


European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata

[ISO 19109] ISO 19109:2006, Geographic Information — Rules for application schemas

[ISO 19156] ISO 19156: 2011, Geographic information - Observations and measurements

[WMO 306] Manual on Codes WMO - No 306, Volumes I.1 and I.2, World Meteorological
Organisation, ISBN 978-92-63-10306-2.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 6
and Meteorological Geographical Features

WMO Manual on the Global Observing System (WMO-No 544)

WMO Manual on the Global Data-processing and Forecasting System (WMO-No. 485)

WMO Manual on the WIS (subject to WMO Congress-XVI 2011 approval)


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 7
and Meteorological Geographical Features

2.4 Terms and definitions


General terms and definitions helpful for understanding the INSPIRE data specification documents are
14
defined in the INSPIRE Glossary .

2.5 Symbols and abbreviations

ATS Abstract Test Suite


CSML Climate Science Modelling Language
EC European Commission
ECMWF European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
EEA European Environmental Agency
EMI European Meteorological Infrastructure
ETRS89 European Terrestrial Reference System 1989
ETRS89-LAEA Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area
EUMETSAT European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
EVRS European Vertical Reference System
GCM General Conceptual Model
GML Geography Markup Language
IR Implementing Rule
ISDSS Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services
ISO International Organization for Standardization
ITRS International Terrestrial Reference System
LAT Lowest Astronomical Tide
LMO Legally Mandated Organisation
SDIC Spatial Data Interest Community
TG Technical Guidance
UML Unified Modeling Language
UTC Coordinated Universal Time
WMO World Meteorological Organization
XML EXtensible Markup Language

2.6 How the Technical Guidelines map to the Implementing Rules


The schematic diagram in Figure 1 gives an overview of the relationships between the INSPIRE legal
acts (the INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules) and the INSPIRE Technical Guidelines. The
INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules include legally binding requirements that describe, usually
on an abstract level, what Member States must implement.

14
The INSPIRE Glossary is available from http://inspire-
registry.jrc.ec.europa.eu/registers/GLOSSARY
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 8
and Meteorological Geographical Features

In contrast, the Technical Guidelines define how Member States might implement the requirements
included in the INSPIRE Implementing Rules. As such, they may include non-binding technical
requirements that must be satisfied if a Member State data provider chooses to conform to the
Technical Guidelines. Implementing these Technical Guidelines will maximise the interoperability of
INSPIRE spatial data sets.

Figure 1 - Relationship between INSPIRE Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines

2.6.1 Requirements
The purpose of these Technical Guidelines (Data specifications on Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features) is to provide practical guidance for implementation that is
guided by, and satisfies, the (legally binding) requirements included for the spatial data theme
Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features in the Regulation (Implementing
Rules) on interoperability of spatial data sets and services. These requirements are highlighted in this
document as follows:

IR Requirement
Article / Annex / Section no.
Title / Heading

This style is used for requirements contained in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of spatial
data sets and services (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010).

For each of these IR requirements, these Technical Guidelines contain additional explanations and
examples.

NOTE The Abstract Test Suite (ATS) in Annex A contains conformance tests that directly check
conformance with these IR requirements.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 9
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Furthermore, these Technical Guidelines may propose a specific technical implementation for
satisfying an IR requirement. In such cases, these Technical Guidelines may contain additional
technical requirements that need to be met in order to be conformant with the corresponding IR
requirement when using this proposed implementation. These technical requirements are highlighted
as follows:

TG Requirement X This style is used for requirements for a specific technical solution proposed in
these Technical Guidelines for an IR requirement.

NOTE 1 Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in the ATS implies
conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).

NOTE 2 In addition to the requirements included in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of


spatial data sets and services, the INSPIRE Directive includes further legally binding obligations that
put additional requirements on data providers. For example, Art. 10(2) requires that Member States
shall, where appropriate, decide by mutual consent on the depiction and position of geographical
features whose location spans the frontier between two or more Member States. General guidance for
how to meet these obligations is provided in the INSPIRE framework documents.

2.6.2 Recommendations
In addition to IR and TG requirements, these Technical Guidelines may also include a number of
recommendations for facilitating implementation or for further and coherent development of an
interoperable infrastructure.

Recommendation X Recommendations are shown using this style.

NOTE The implementation of recommendations is not mandatory. Compliance with these Technical
Guidelines or the legal obligation does not depend on the fulfilment of the recommendations.

2.6.3 Conformance
Annex A includes the abstract test suite for checking conformance with the requirements included in
these Technical Guidelines and the corresponding parts of the Implementing Rules (Commission
Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010).

3 Specification scopes
This data specification does not distinguish different specification scopes, but just considers one
general scope.

NOTE For more information on specification scopes, see [ISO 19131:2007], clause 8 and Annex D.

4 Identification information
These Technical Guidelines are identified by the following URI:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/tg/ac-mf/3.0

NOTE ISO 19131 suggests further identification information to be included in this section, e.g. the
title, abstract or spatial representation type. The proposed items are already described in the
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 10
and Meteorological Geographical Features

document metadata, executive summary, overview description (section 2) and descriptions of the
application schemas (section 5). In order to avoid redundancy, they are not repeated here.

5 Data content and structure


This data specification defines the following application schema:
 The Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features application schema.

5.1 Application schemas – Overview


5.1.1 Application schemas included in the IRs

Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the Implementing Rules lay down the requirements for the content and structure
of the data sets related to the INSPIRE Annex themes.

IR Requirement
Article 4
Types for the Exchange and Classification of Spatial Objects

1. For the exchange and classification of spatial objects from data sets meeting the conditions laid
down in Article 4 of Directive 2007/2/EC, Member States shall use the spatial object types and
associated data types, enumerations and code lists that are defined in Annexes II, III and IV for the
themes the data sets relate to.

2. Spatial object types and data types shall comply with the definitions and constraints and include
the attributes and association roles set out in the Annexes.

3. The enumerations and code lists used in attributes or association roles of spatial object types or data
types shall comply with the definitions and include the values set out in Annex II. The enumeration and
code list values are uniquely identified by language-neutral mnemonic codes for computers. The values
may also include a language-specific name to be used for human interaction.

The types to be used for the exchange and classification of spatial objects from data sets related to
the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features are defined
in the following application schemas (see sections 5.3):

 The Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features application schema


(section 5.3).

The application schemas specify requirements on the properties of each spatial object including its
multiplicity, domain of valid values, constraints, etc.

NOTE The application schemas presented in this section contain some additional information that is
not included in the Implementing Rules, in particular multiplicities of attributes and association roles.

TG Requirement 1 Spatial object types and data types shall comply with the multiplicities defined
for the attributes and association roles in this section.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 11
and Meteorological Geographical Features

An application schema may include references (e.g. in attributes or inheritance relationships) to


common types or types defined in other spatial data themes. These types can be found in a sub-
section called ―Imported Types‖ at the end of each application schema section. The common types
referred to from application schemas included in the IRs are addressed in Article 3.

IR Requirement
Article 3
Common Types

Types that are common to several of the themes listed in Annexes I, II and III to Directive
2007/2/EC shall conform to the definitions and constraints and include the attributes and
association roles set out in Annex I.

NOTE Since the IRs contain the types for all INSPIRE spatial data themes in one document, Article
3 does not explicitly refer to types defined in other spatial data themes, but only to types defined in
external data models.

Common types are described in detail in the Generic Conceptual Model [DS-D2.7], in the relevant
international standards (e.g. of the ISO 19100 series) or in the documents on the common INSPIRE
models [DS-D2.10.x]. For detailed descriptions of types defined in other spatial data themes, see the
corresponding Data Specification TG document [DS-D2.8.x].

5.1.2 Additional recommended application schemas


There is no additional application schemas defined for the theme Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features.

5.2 Basic notions


This section explains some of the basic notions used in the INSPIRE application schemas. These
explanations are based on the GCM [DS-D2.5].

5.2.1 Notation

5.2.1.1. Unified Modeling Language (UML)

The application schemas included in this section are specified in UML, version 2.1. The spatial object
types, their properties and associated types are shown in UML class diagrams.

NOTE For an overview of the UML notation, see Annex D in [ISO 19103].

The use of a common conceptual schema language (i.e. UML) allows for an automated processing of
application schemas and the encoding, querying and updating of data based on the application
schema – across different themes and different levels of detail.

The following important rules related to class inheritance and abstract classes are included in the IRs.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 12
and Meteorological Geographical Features

IR Requirement
Article 5
Types

(…)

2. Types that are a sub-type of another type shall also include all this type‘s attributes and
association roles.

3. Abstract types shall not be instantiated.

The use of UML conforms to ISO 19109 8.3 and ISO/TS 19103 with the exception that UML 2.1
instead of ISO/IEC 19501 is being used. The use of UML also conforms to ISO 19136 E.2.1.1.1-
E.2.1.1.4.

NOTE ISO/TS 19103 and ISO 19109 specify a profile of UML to be used in conjunction with the
ISO 19100 series. This includes in particular a list of stereotypes and basic types to be used in
application schemas. ISO 19136 specifies a more restricted UML profile that allows for a direct
encoding in XML Schema for data transfer purposes.

To model constraints on the spatial object types and their properties, in particular to express data/data
set consistency rules, OCL (Object Constraint Language) is used as described in ISO/TS 19103,
whenever possible. In addition, all constraints are described in the feature catalogue in English, too.

NOTE Since ―void‖ is not a concept supported by OCL, OCL constraints cannot include expressions
to test whether a value is a void value. Such constraints may only be expressed in natural language.

5.2.1.2. Stereotypes

In the application schemas in this section several stereotypes are used that have been defined as part
of a UML profile for use in INSPIRE [DS-D2.5]. These are explained in Table 1 below.

Table 1 – Stereotypes (adapted from [DS-D2.5])


Model
Stereotype Description
element
applicationSchema Package An INSPIRE application schema according to ISO 19109 and
the Generic Conceptual Model.
leaf Package A package that is not an application schema and contains no
packages.
featureType Class A spatial object type.
type Class A type that is not directly instantiable, but is used as an abstract
collection of operation, attribute and relation signatures. This
stereotype should usually not be used in INSPIRE application
schemas as these are on a different conceptual level than
classifiers with this stereotype.
dataType Class A structured data type without identity.
union Class A structured data type without identity where exactly one of the
properties of the type is present in any instance.
enumeration Class An enumeration.
codeList Class A code list.
import Dependency The model elements of the supplier package are imported.
voidable Attribute, A voidable attribute or association role (see section 5.2.2).
association
role
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 13
and Meteorological Geographical Features

lifeCycleInfo Attribute, If in an application schema a property is considered to be part


association of the life-cycle information of a spatial object type, the property
role shall receive this stereotype.
version Association If in an application schema an association role ends at a spatial
role object type, this stereotype denotes that the value of the
property is meant to be a specific version of the spatial object,
not the spatial object in general.

5.2.2 Voidable characteristics


The «voidable» stereotype is used to characterise those properties of a spatial object that may not be
present in some spatial data sets, even though they may be present or applicable in the real world.
This does not mean that it is optional to provide a value for those properties.

For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided – either the corresponding
value (if available in the data set maintained by the data provider) or the value of void. A void value
shall imply that no corresponding value is contained in the source spatial data set maintained by the
data provider or no corresponding value can be derived from existing values at reasonable costs.

Recommendation 2 The reason for a void value should be provided where possible using a
listed value from the VoidReasonValue code list to indicate the reason for
the missing value.

The VoidReasonValue type is a code list, which includes the following pre-defined values:
 Unpopulated: The property is not part of the dataset maintained by the data provider. However,
the characteristic may exist in the real world. For example when the ―elevation of the water body
above the sea level‖ has not been included in a dataset containing lake spatial objects, then the
reason for a void value of this property would be ‗Unpopulated‘. The property receives this value
for all spatial objects in the spatial data set.
 Unknown: The correct value for the specific spatial object is not known to, and not computable
by the data provider. However, a correct value may exist. For example when the ―elevation of
the water body above the sea level‖ of a certain lake has not been measured, then the reason
for a void value of this property would be ‗Unknown‘. This value is applied only to those spatial
objects where the property in question is not known.
 Withheld: The characteristic may exist, but is confidential and not divulged by the data provider.

NOTE It is possible that additional reasons will be identified in the future, in particular to support
reasons / special values in coverage ranges.

The «voidable» stereotype does not give any information on whether or not a characteristic exists in
the real world. This is expressed using the multiplicity:
 If a characteristic may or may not exist in the real world, its minimum cardinality shall be defined
as 0. For example, if an Address may or may not have a house number, the multiplicity of the
corresponding property shall be 0..1.
 If at least one value for a certain characteristic exists in the real world, the minimum cardinality
shall be defined as 1. For example, if an Administrative Unit always has at least one name, the
multiplicity of the corresponding property shall be 1..*.

In both cases, the «voidable» stereotype can be applied. In cases where the minimum multiplicity is 0,
the absence of a value indicates that it is known that no value exists, whereas a value of void indicates
that it is not known whether a value exists or not.

EXAMPLE If an address does not have a house number, the corresponding Address object should
not have any value for the «voidable» attribute house number. If the house number is simply not
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 14
and Meteorological Geographical Features

known or not populated in the data set, the Address object should receive a value of void (with the
corresponding void reason) for the house number attribute.

5.2.3 Enumerations
Enumerations are modelled as classes in the application schemas. Their values are modelled as
attributes of the enumeration class using the following modelling style:
 No initial value, but only the attribute name part, is used.
 The attribute name conforms to the rules for attributes names, i.e. is a lowerCamelCase name.
Exceptions are words that consist of all uppercase letters (acronyms).

IR Requirement
Article 6
Code Lists and Enumerations

(…)

5) Attributes or association roles of spatial object types or data types that have an enumeration
type may only take values from the lists specified for the enumeration type.‖

5.2.4 Code lists


Code lists are modelled as classes in the application schemas. Their values, however, are managed
outside of the application schema.

5.2.4.1. Code list types

The IRs distinguish the following types of code lists.

IR Requirement
Article 6
Code Lists and Enumerations

1) Code lists shall be of one of the following types, as specified in the Annexes:
a) code lists whose allowed values comprise only the values specified in this Regulation;
b) code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in this Regulation and
narrower values defined by data providers;
c) code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in this Regulation and
additional values at any level defined by data providers;
d) code lists, whose allowed values comprise any values defined by data providers.

For the purposes of points (b), (c) and (d), in addition to the allowed values, data providers may
use the values specified in the relevant INSPIRE Technical Guidance document available on the
INSPIRE web site of the Joint Research Centre.

The type of code list is represented in the UML model through the tagged value extensibility, which
can take the following values:
 none, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise only the values specified in the
IRs (type a);
 narrower, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs
and narrower values defined by data providers (type b);
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 15
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 open, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs
and additional values at any level defined by data providers (type c); and
 any, representing code lists, for which the IRs do not specify any allowed values, i.e. whose
allowed values comprise any values defined by data providers (type d).

Recommendation 3 Additional values defined by data providers should not replace or redefine
any value already specified in the IRs.

NOTE This data specification may specify recommended values for some of the code lists of type (b),
(c) and (d) (see section 5.2.4.3). These recommended values are specified in a dedicated Annex.

In addition, code lists can be hierarchical, as explained in Article 6(2) of the IRs.

IR Requirement
Article 6
Code Lists and Enumerations
(…)

2) Code lists may be hierarchical. Values of hierarchical code lists may have a more generic parent
value. Where the valid values of a hierarchical code list are specified in a table in this
Regulation, the parent values are listed in the last column.

The type of code list and whether it is hierarchical or not is also indicated in the feature catalogues.

5.2.4.2. Obligations on data providers

IR Requirement
Article 6
Code Lists and Enumerations

(….)

3) Where, for an attribute whose type is a code list as referred to in points (b), (c) or (d) of
paragraph 1, a data provider provides a value that is not specified in this Regulation, that value
and its definition shall be made available in a register.

4) Attributes or association roles of spatial object types or data types whose type is a code list may
only take values that are allowed according to the specification of the code list.

Article 6(4) obliges data providers to use only values that are allowed according to the specification of
the code list. The ―allowed values according to the specification of the code list‖ are the values
explicitly defined in the IRs plus (in the case of code lists of type (b), (c) and (d)) additional values
defined by data providers.

For attributes whose type is a code list of type (b), (c) or (d) data providers may use additional values
that are not defined in the IRs. Article 6(3) requires that such additional values and their definition be
made available in a register. This enables users of the data to look up the meaning of the additional
values used in a data set, and also facilitates the re-use of additional values by other data providers
(potentially across Member States).

NOTE Guidelines for setting up registers for additional values and how to register additional values in
these registers is still an open discussion point between Member States and the Commission.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 16
and Meteorological Geographical Features

5.2.4.3. Recommended code list values

For code lists of type (b), (c) and (d), this data specification may propose additional values as a
recommendation (in a dedicated Annex). These values will be included in the INSPIRE code list
register. This will facilitate and encourage the usage of the recommended values by data providers
since the obligation to make additional values defined by data providers available in a register (see
section 5.2.4.2) is already met.

Recommendation 4 Where these Technical Guidelines recommend values for a code list in
addition to those specified in the IRs, these values should be used.

NOTE For some code lists of type (d), no values may be specified in these Technical Guidelines. In
these cases, any additional value defined by data providers may be used.

5.2.4.4. Governance

The following two types of code lists are distinguished in INSPIRE:


 Code lists that are governed by INSPIRE (INSPIRE-governed code lists). These code lists will
be managed centrally in the INSPIRE code list register. Change requests to these code lists
(e.g. to add, deprecate or supersede values) are processed and decided upon using the
INSPIRE code list register‘s maintenance workflows.

INSPIRE-governed code lists will be made available in the INSPIRE code list register at
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>. They will be available in SKOS/RDF, XML
and HTML. The maintenance will follow the procedures defined in ISO 19135. This means that
the only allowed changes to a code list are the addition, deprecation or supersession of values,
i.e. no value will ever be deleted, but only receive different statuses (valid, deprecated,
superseded). Identifiers for values of INSPIRE-governed code lists are constructed using the
pattern http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>/<value>.

 Code lists that are governed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE (externally governed code
lists). These code lists are managed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE, e.g. the World
Meteorological Organization (WMO) or the World Health Organization (WHO). Change requests
to these code lists follow the maintenance workflows defined by the maintaining organisations.
Note that in some cases, no such workflows may be formally defined.

Since the updates of externally governed code lists is outside the control of INSPIRE, the IRs
and these Technical Guidelines reference a specific version for such code lists.

The tables describing externally governed code lists in this section contain the following
columns:
 The Governance column describes the external organisation that is responsible for
maintaining the code list.
 The Source column specifies a citation for the authoritative source for the values of the
code list. For code lists, whose values are mandated in the IRs, this citation should
include the version of the code list used in INSPIRE. The version can be specified using a
version number or the publication date. For code list values recommended in these
Technical Guidelines, the citation may refer to the ―latest available version‖.
 In some cases, for INSPIRE only a subset of an externally governed code list is relevant.
The subset is specified using the Subset column.
 The Availability column specifies from where (e.g. URL) the values of the externally
governed code list are available, and in which formats. Formats can include machine-
readable (e.g. SKOS/RDF, XML) or human-readable (e.g. HTML, PDF) ones.

Code list values are encoded using http URIs and labels. Rules for generating these URIs and
labels are specified in a separate table.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 17
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 5 The http URIs and labels used for encoding code list values should be
taken from the INSPIRE code list registry for INSPIRE-governed code lists
and generated according to the relevant rules specified for externally
governed code lists.

NOTE Where practicable, the INSPIRE code list register could also provide http URIs and labels for
externally governed code lists.

5.2.4.5. Vocabulary

For each code list, a tagged value called ―vocabulary‖ is specified to define a URI identifying the
values of the code list. For INSPIRE-governed code lists and externally governed code lists that do not
have a persistent identifier, the URI is constructed following the pattern
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<UpperCamelCaseName>.

If the value is missing or empty, this indicates an empty code list. If no sub-classes are defined for this
empty code list, this means that any code list may be used that meets the given definition.

An empty code list may also be used as a super-class for a number of specific code lists whose values
may be used to specify the attribute value. If the sub-classes specified in the model represent all valid
extensions to the empty code list, the subtyping relationship is qualified with the standard UML
constraint "{complete,disjoint}".

5.2.5 Identifier management

IR Requirement
Article 9
Identifier Management

1. The data type Identifier defined in Section 2.1 of Annex I shall be used as a type for the external
object identifier of a spatial object.
2. The external object identifier for the unique identification of spatial objects shall not be changed
during the life-cycle of a spatial object.

NOTE 1 An external object identifier is a unique object identifier which is published by the responsible
body, which may be used by external applications to reference the spatial object. [DS-D2.5]

NOTE 2 Article 9(1) is implemented in each application schema by including the attribute inspireId of
type Identifier.

NOTE 3 Article 9(2) is ensured if the namespace and localId attributes of the Identifier remains the
same for different versions of a spatial object; the version attribute can of course change.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 18
and Meteorological Geographical Features

5.2.6 Geometry representation

IR Requirement
Article 12
Other Requirements & Rules

1. The value domain of spatial properties defined in this Regulation shall be restricted to the
Simple Feature spatial schema as defined in Herring, John R. (ed.), OpenGIS® Implementation
Standard for Geographic information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture,
version 1.2.1, Open Geospatial Consortium, 2011, unless specified otherwise for a specific
spatial data theme or type.

NOTE 1 The specification restricts the spatial schema to 0-, 1-, 2-, and 2.5-dimensional geometries
where all curve interpolations are linear and surface interpolations are performed by triangles.

NOTE 2 The topological relations of two spatial objects based on their specific geometry and topology
properties can in principle be investigated by invoking the operations of the types defined in ISO
19107 (or the methods specified in EN ISO 19125-1).

5.2.7 Temporality representation


The application schema(s) use(s) the derived attributes "beginLifespanVersion" and
"endLifespanVersion" to record the lifespan of a spatial object.

The attributes "beginLifespanVersion" specifies the date and time at which this version of the spatial
object was inserted or changed in the spatial data set. The attribute "endLifespanVersion" specifies
the date and time at which this version of the spatial object was superseded or retired in the spatial
data set.

NOTE 1 The attributes specify the beginning of the lifespan of the version in the spatial data set itself,
which is different from the temporal characteristics of the real-world phenomenon described by the
spatial object. This lifespan information, if available, supports mainly two requirements: First,
knowledge about the spatial data set content at a specific time; second, knowledge about changes to
a data set in a specific time frame. The lifespan information should be as detailed as in the data set
(i.e., if the lifespan information in the data set includes seconds, the seconds should be represented in
data published in INSPIRE) and include time zone information.

NOTE 2 Changes to the attribute "endLifespanVersion" does not trigger a change in the attribute
"beginLifespanVersion".

IR Requirement
Article 10
Life-cycle of Spatial Objects

(…)

3. Where the attributes beginLifespanVersion and endLifespanVersion are used, the value of
endLifespanVersion shall not be before the value of beginLifespanVersion.

NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in
the UML data models of all themes.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 19
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 6 If life-cycle information is not maintained as part of the spatial data set, all
spatial objects belonging to this data set should provide a void value with a
reason of "unpopulated".

5.2.7.1. Validity of the real-world phenomena

The application schema(s) use(s) the attributes "validFrom" and "validTo" to record the validity of the
real-world phenomenon represented by a spatial object.

The attributes "validFrom" specifies the date and time at which the real-world phenomenon became
valid in the real world. The attribute "validTo" specifies the date and time at which the real-world
phenomenon is no longer valid in the real world.

Specific application schemas may give examples what ―being valid‖ means for a specific real-world
phenomenon represented by a spatial object.

IR Requirement
Article 12
Other Requirements & Rules

(…)

3. Where the attributes validFrom and validTo are used, the value of validTo shall not be before the
value of validFrom.

NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in
the UML data models of all themes.

5.2.8 Coverages
Coverage functions are used to describe characteristics of real-world phenomena that vary over space
and/or time. Typical examples are temperature, elevation, precipitation, imagery. A coverage contains
a set of such values, each associated with one of the elements in a spatial, temporal or spatio-
temporal domain. Typical spatial domains are point sets (e.g. sensor locations), curve sets (e.g.
isolines), grids (e.g. orthoimages, elevation models), etc.

In INSPIRE application schemas, coverage functions are defined as properties of spatial object types
where the type of the property value is a realisation of one of the types specified in ISO 19123.

To improve alignment with coverage standards on the implementation level (e.g. ISO 19136 and the
OGC Web Coverage Service) and to improve the cross-theme harmonisation on the use of coverages
in INSPIRE, an application schema for coverage types is included in the Generic Conceptual Model in
9.9.4. This application schema contains the following coverage types:

 RectifiedGridCoverage: coverage whose domain consists of a rectified grid – a grid for which
there is an affine transformation between the grid coordinates and the coordinates of a
coordinate reference system (see Figure 2, left).
 ReferenceableGridCoverage: coverage whose domain consists of a referenceable grid – a grid
associated with a transformation that can be used to convert grid coordinate values to values of
coordinates referenced to a coordinate reference system (see Figure 2, right).
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 20
and Meteorological Geographical Features

In addition, some themes make reference to the types TimeValuePair and Timeseries defined in
®
Taylor, Peter (ed.), OGC WaterML 2.0: Part 1 – Timeseries, v2.0.0, Open Geospatial Consortium,
2012. These provide a representation of the time instant/value pairs, i.e. time series (see Figure 3).

Where possible, only these coverage types (or a subtype thereof) are used in INSPIRE application
schemas.

(Source: ISO 19136:2007) (Source: GML 3.3.0)

Figure 2 – Examples of a rectified grid (left) and a referenceable grid (right)

Figure 3 – Example of a time series

5.3 Application schema Atmospheric Conditions and


Meteorological Geographical Features
5.3.1 Description

Identification of meteorological features


In meteorology there are few objects in the usual (vernacular) meaning of this term, and they are
seldom of any significance to the users, which makes the identification of spatial objects not at all
15
straightforward. Therefore the model is based entirely on what could be called an Eulerian approach ,
aimed at providing information at specific locations in space and time (past and future). In applications
where a Lagrangian approach is appropriate, such as pollution emergencies with plume identification,

15
Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_and_Eulerian_specification_of_the_flow_field
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 21
and Meteorological Geographical Features

the underlying information, e.g. concentration of pollutants, will still be exchanged as grids or other
point values collection.

5.3.1.1. Narrative description

The Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features data specification is based on
the Observation and Measurements (O&M) conceptual model, defined in ISO 19156:2011, using
concepts – together with their associations - defined within INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model.

ISO 19156:2011 defines the concept of observation, an act that results in the estimation of the value
of a feature property using a designated procedure, such as a sensor, instrument, algorithm or
process chain. An observation is associated with a discrete time instant or period through which a
number, term or other symbol is assigned to a phenomenon. The result of an observation is an
estimate of the value of a property of some feature, so the details of the observation are metadata
concerning the value of the feature property.

Concepts defined within ISO 19156 and are directly associated with the concept of observation are
(see Figure 5):
Feature of interest: a real-world object whose properties are under observation, or is a feature in-
tended to sample the real-world object.
Observed Property: a phenomenon associated with the feature-of-interest for which the observation
result provides an estimate of its value.
Process: a process (procedure) used to generate the result. A process might be responsible for more
than one observation. A description of the observation procedure provides or implies an indication of
the reliability or quality of the observation result.

Observation results may have many data-types, including primitive types like category or measure, but
also more complex types such as time, location and geometry.

The result-type may be used as a basis for defining specialized observation types. A specialised
observation type, defined in O&M model, is the discrete coverage observation whose result is
‗coverage‘, i.e. result values are explicitly associated with specific locations in space and time (see
Figure 6).

For applications where an exhaustive observation of environmental parameters is not possible – for
example, there is no observation that can provide air temperature values of the whole atmosphere
above London – so that spatial sampling strategies need to be involved, considerable flexibility
regarding the target of an observation (the ‗feature of interest‘) can be provided by the sampling
coverage observation (a specialisation of discrete coverage observation). The feature of interest for a
sampling coverage observation is a spatial sampling feature (a concept defined also in O&M model)
which de-scribes the applied sampling regime (see Figure 6).
Spatial sampling feature is a specialisation of the generic concept sampling feature, an artefact of the
observational strategy which has no significance function outside of its role in the observation process
- it is established in order to make observations concerning some domain feature.

Spatial sampling features are useful when observations are made to estimate properties of a
geospatial feature such as the atmosphere, in particular where the value of a property varies within the
scope of the feature. Spatial sampling features can be specialised according to their shapes: point,
curve, surface and solid spatial sampling features (see Figure 5).

The following Figure illustrates the use of concepts: sampling coverage observation, sampling feature
and sam-pled feature in an example of time series measurements of air temperature (observed
property) at a specific location (a point spatial sampling feature) of the atmosphere above Chilbolton
Observatory, UK (sampled feature).
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 22
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 4: Example of time series measurements of air temperature showing the use of the
concepts: sampling coverage observation, sampling feature and sampled feature

Use of this common model allows observation data (either from measurements, model runs or both)
using different procedures to be combined unambiguously. Observation details are also important for
data discovery and for data quality estimation.

INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model


Specialised observations defined within INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model describe elegantly a wide
range of data regarding atmospheric conditions or meteorological phenomena. In particular, the
specialised observations used in this data specification are (see Figure 9):

Point observation: an observation that represents a measurement or estimation of a property at a


single point in time and space, e.g. a single temperature measurement at a fixed weather station.
Point Time Series Observation: an observation that represents a time-series of point measurements
or estimations of a property at a fixed location in space, e.g. measurements made repeatedly by a
fixed monitoring instrument.
Multi Point Observation: an Observation that represents a set of measurements or estimations all
made at exactly the same time but at different locations, e.g. a distributed sensor network reporting the
temperature at 10am. The result of this observation is a MultiPointCoverage.
Grid Observation: an observation representing a gridded field at a single time instant, e.g. output
from a model, or rectified georeferenced satellite data. The result of a Grid Observation is a discrete
coverage within a compound spatiotemporal CRS where the domain consists of a two- or three-
dimensional grid of points, all having the same time instant temporal component.
Grid Series Observation: an observation representing an evolving gridded field at a succession of
time instants. A Grid Series Observation is a time series of gridded fields representing the same
phenomenon (or phenomena) over a series of time instances. The result of a Grid Series Observation
is a discrete coverage within a compound spatiotemporal CRS where the domain consists of a series
of two- or three-dimensional grids of points, each at a successive time instant.
Profile Observation: an observation representing the estimates of a property along a vertical profile in
space at a single time instant.
Trajectory Observation: an observation representing the estimates of a property along a meandering
curve in time and space, e.g. a Pollutant concentration from a mobile air quality sensor.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 23
and Meteorological Geographical Features

IR Requirement
Annex IV, Section 13.3
Theme-specific Requirements

The observed property of an OM_Observation shall be identified by an identifier from the EU Air
Quality Reference Component, the WMO GRIB Code & Flags Table 4.2, the Climate and Forecast
Standard Names vocabularies or another appropriate vocabulary.

The observed property of an observation instance shall be extracted from the codelists CF Standard
Names Value, WMO GRIB Table 4.2 Value and EU Air Quality Reference Component Value, de-
pending on the need of the application for which the data is produced (see section 5.3.1.2). Following
the application schema ―Observable properties‖ of the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model the
observed property of an observation can be composite, i.e., consisting of two or more observed
properties extracted from the above mentioned code lists. Further detail required for the observed
property, which are not given by the used code list e.g. daily maximum temperature, shall be provided
by the classes Constraint and Statistical Measure (see Figure 7 and Figure 10).

The Directive states that atmospheric data can originate from measurements, models, or post-
processed information combining measurement and model output. The ―Process‖ of the INSPIRE
Generic Conceptual Model, which specialises the abstract class OM_Process, shall pro-vide
information regarding the procedure used to generate the result of an observation (see Figure 8). This
set of information consists of the following information pieces: identification, type and further
documentation of the applied procedure (online/offline); individual(s) and/or organisation(s) related to
the procedure; names of parameters controlling the procedure‘s output. Typical examples of using the
process-Parameter attribute are: description of instrumentation settings for a specific measurement or
measurement series; description of initial conditions in numerical computations e.g. simulations. The
values of the parameters denoted by the processParameter attribute are stored in the
OM_Observation.parameter attribute.

Spatial/Temporal extent, Quality and additional metadata of data


The spatial and temporal extents of an observation are provided by the observation‘s related spatial
sampling feature and the OM_Observation attribute phenomenonTime respectively [ISO 19156:2011].

If description of the quality of the observation result is required, it shall be provided by the attribute
resultQuality:DQ_Element of the generic class OM_Observation.

Additional information for the observed values could be provided by the ISO 19115 class
MD_Metadata.

5.3.1.2. Basic properties

Observable property external code lists


Chapter 5.3.3 Code lists provides detailed guidance on the requirements for the provision and
maintenance of external code lists by a competent international organisation (the preferred solution),
and these organisations have their own governance and version management processes, allowing the
code lists to be extended in response to community needs.

The choice of external code list is within the scope of this data specification. It is acknowledged that no
single existing external code list sufficiently meets all requirements for AC-MF, but that a number code
lists collectively do cover the requirement. Whilst no absolute requirements are placed on the use of
particular external code lists, strong recommendations are made.

Meteorological parameters are represented within the AC-MF model through the Observable Property
model, which provides the ability to describe statistical properties and constraints. This model includes
main three properties for which codelists are required:
basePhenomenon (also used for constrainedProperty) (e.g. ―air_temperature‖)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 24
and Meteorological Geographical Features

statisticalFunction (e.g. ―maximum‖)


uom – units of measure (e.g. ―K‖)

Units of measure are managed in a standard way for all INSPIRE themes (using UCUM:
http://unitsofmeasure.org/), and so are not considered further here.

Statistical function is provide as an INSPIRE-managed codelist as part of the O&M Complex Property
model (StatisticalFunctionTypeValue), and so is not considered further here.

For basePhenomenon (and constrainedProperty), it is recommended that meteorological parameters


are referenced either as:
CF Standard Names from the NERC Vocabulary Server
WMO GRIB parameters from Code Table 4.2 of the GRIB code tables
And that air quality parameters are referenced either as:
EEA reference air quality components in the codelists on the Eionet Air Quality Portal
CF Standard Names from the NERC Vocabulary Server
However, it should be noted that the terms for air quality are still under development.

Recommendation 7 basePhenomenon should refer to external code lists CF Standard Names,


Code Table 4.2 of the WMO GRIB code tables or codelists on the Eionet
Air Quality Portal.

5.3.1.3. UML Overview


class Observ ation(Informati...

«metaclass»
General Feature Model::
GF_PropertyType
{root} «DataType»
observ ation::NamedValue
«FeatureType»
General Feature Instance:: + definition: CharacterString
+ memberName: LocalName + name: GenericName
GFI_Feature + value: Any
+featureOfInterest

1
+observedProperty 1
+sampledFeature 1..*
Domain
Intention Phenomenon
«informative» 0..*
+propertyValueProvider
«FeatureType»
0..* observ ation::OM_Observ ation
«FeatureType»
samplingFeature::SF_SamplingFeature + parameter: NamedValue [0..*] +relatedObservation 0..*
+relatedObservation + phenomenonTime: TM_Object
+ lineage: LI_Lineage [0..1] Design
+ resultQuality: DQ_Element [0..*]
+ parameter: NamedValue [0..*]
+ resultTime: TM_Instant
0..*
+ validTime: TM_Period [0..1]
+relatedSamplingFeature 0..*

0..*
+generatedObservation 0..*
Range
ProcessUsed
«FeatureType» +result
spatialSamplingFeature::SF_SpatialSamplingFeature
«type»
+procedure 1 Records and Class Metadata::
+ positionalAccuracy: DQ_PositionalAccuracy [0..2] Platform
Any
«FeatureType»
0..* {root}
+hostedProcedure observation::OM_Process

«FeatureType» «FeatureType» «FeatureType» «FeatureType»


samplingPoint:: samplingCurv e:: samplingSurface:: samplingSolid::
SF_SamplingPoint SF_SamplingCurv e SF_SamplingSurface SF_SamplingSolid

Figure 5: Overview of generic Observation concept together with the directly associated
concepts FeatureOfInterest, observedProperty, procedure and sampling feature
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 25
and Meteorological Geographical Features
class Cov erageObserv ation(Informati...

+relatedSamplingFeature 0..* 0..*


0..*
GFI_Feature +relatedObservation
«FeatureType»
«FeatureType» Design observ ation::
samplingFeature::SF_SamplingFeature OM_Observ ation
0..* +relatedObservation 0..*
+ lineage: LI_Lineage [0..1]
+ parameter: NamedValue [0..*]

«FeatureType»
cov erageObserv ation::
OM_DiscreteCov erageObserv ation

Range
«FeatureType»
spatialSamplingFeature:: +result
SF_SpatialSamplingFeature CV_Coverage
«type»
+featureOfInterest Discrete Coverages::
CV_DiscreteCoverage

Domain
Geometry

+shape
«FeatureType»
«type» Sampling Cov erage Observ ation::SamplingCov erageObserv ation
Geometry root::GM_Object
{root}
constraints
{observedProperty shall be consistent with result.rangeType}
{featureOfInterest.shape shall be consistent with spatial components of result.domain}
{phenomenonTime shall be consistent with temporal component of result.domain}

Figure 6: The specialised observations OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation and


SamplingCoverageObservation of O&M model
class Observ able Properti...

«Type» «metaclass»
AbstractObservableProperty General Feature Model::GF_PropertyType
realises {root}
+component
+ label: CharacterString [0..*]
2..* + definition: CharacterString
+ memberName: LocalName

«Type» «Type»
CompositeObserv ableProperty Observ ableProperty

+ count: Integer + basePhenomenon: PhenomenonTypeValue


+ uom: UnitOfMeasure [0..1]

+statisticalMeasure
0..*

«type»
+restriction
StatisticalMeasure 0..*

+ aggregationArea: Area [0..1] «dataType»


+ aggregationLength: Length [0..1] Constraint
+ aggregationTimePeriod: TM_Duration [0..1]
+derivedFrom + aggregationVolume: Volume [0..1] + constrainedProperty: PhenomenonTypeValue [0..1]
0..1 + label: CharacterString [0..1] + label: CharacterString [0..1]
+ otherAggregation: Any [0..1]
+ statisticalFunction: StatisticalFunctionTypeValue [0..1]

«dataType» «dataType» «dataType» «dataType»


ScalarConstraint RangeConstraint CategoryConstraint OtherConstraint

+ comparison: ComparisonOperatorValue + uom: UnitOfMeasure [0..1] + comparison: ComparisonOperatorValue + description: CharacterString


+ uom: UnitOfMeasure [0..1] + value: RangeBounds [1..*] + value: CharacterString [1..*]
+ value: Real [1..*]

«enumeration» «dataType» «codeList» «codeList»


ComparisonOperatorValue RangeBounds StatisticalFunctionTypeValue PhenomenonTypeValue

equalTo + endComparison: ComparisonOperatorValue


notEqualTo + rangeEnd: Real tags tags
lessThan + rangeStart: Real asDictionary = true asDictionary = true
greaterThan + startComparison: ComparisonOperatorValue extensibility = any extensibility = any
lessThanOrEqualTo vocabulary = vocabulary =
greaterThanOrEqualTo xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 26
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 7: The Observable Property Model Process as defined within INSPIRE Generic
Conceptual Model
class Process

+relatedObservation 0..*

«FeatureType»
0..*
observ ation::OM_Observ ation
«FeatureType»
+ parameter: NamedValue [0..*] ProcessUsed +procedure observation::OM_Process
+ phenomenonTime: TM_Object
+ resultQuality: DQ_Element [0..*] 0..* 1
+ resultTime: TM_Instant +generatedObservation
+ validTime: TM_Period [0..1]

Base Types 2::DocumentCitation «featureType»


Process
+ name: CharacterString
+ shortName: CharacterString [0..1] «voidable»
«voidable» + documentation: DocumentCitation [0..*]
+ date: CI_Date + inspireld: Identifier
+ link: URL [1..*] + name: CharacterString [0..1]
+ processParameter: ProcessParameter [0..*]
+ responsibleParty: CI_ResponsibleParty [1..*]
+ type: CharacterString

«codeList» «dataType»
ProcessParameterNameValue ProcessParameter

+ description: CharacterString [0..1]


tags + name: ProcessParameterNameValue
asDictionary = true
extensibility = any
vocabulary =
xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions

Figure 8: The INSPIRE Process as defined within INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 27
and Meteorological Geographical Features
class AC-MF : Ov erv i...

ISO 19156

«FeatureType»
observ ation::OM_Observ ation +relatedObservation 0..*

0..*

«FeatureType»
cov erageObserv ation::
OM_DiscreteCov erageObserv ation

«FeatureType»
Sampling Cov erage Observ ation::SamplingCov erageObserv ation

INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model

«featureType» «featureType» «featureType»


Point Observ ations::PointObserv ation Point Observ ations::MultiPointObserv ation Point Observ ations::PointTimeSeriesObserv ation

«featureType» «featureType»
Gridded Observ ations::GridObserv ation Gridded Observ ations::GridSeriesObserv ation

«featureType» «featureType»
Traj ectory and Profile Observ ations:: Traj ectory and Profile Observ ations::
Traj ectoryObserv ation ProfileObserv ation

Figure 9: The Observation classes used to describe data within AC-MF data specification
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 28
and Meteorological Geographical Features

class AC-MF: Observ edProperty codelist

«codeList»
Observ able Properties::PhenomenonTypeValue

tags
asDictionary = true
extensibility = any
vocabulary =
xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions

«codeList»
Base Types 2::CF_StandardNamesValue

tags
asDictionary = true
extensibility = none
vocabulary = http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current/
xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions
«codeList»
EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue

tags
asDictionary = true
extensibility = none
vocabulary = http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal/codelists
xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions

«codeList»
GRIB_CodeTable4_2Value

tags
asDictionary = true
extensibility = none
vocabulary = http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I01/current
xsdEncodingRule = iso19136_2007_INSPIRE_Extensions

Figure 10: Code lists used for AC-MF data specification

5.3.1.4. Consistency between spatial data sets

Not relevant for AC-MF.

5.3.1.5. Identifier management

Three places were identified in the AC-MF data model where INSPIRE identifiers might be used, but in
all three cases it is argued that there is no strong use case for such use, and therefore no
requirements are made for such usage; the text below explores the three cases to explain this
reasoning.

A) INSPIRE identifier for SpecialisedObservations


INSPIRE identifiers are intended to provide stable, unique references to the data, but
SpecialisedObservations are not usually assigned such an identifier, but rather referred to by a
combination of their geographic and temporal characteristics. Further, they are often transient (e.g. for
real-time data) and may be groups and aggregated in many different ways. They are only usually
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 29
and Meteorological Geographical Features

references in a persistent way through the broader dataset to which they belong, which is described by
the dataset-level metadata.

B) Geographic identifiers
Where relevant, geographic identifiers are related to features of interest and/or sampling features,
such as observing stations, administrative units, and transport network. Geographic identifiers could
be a WMO station identifier (i.e. ―07481‖), an ICAO identifier (i.e. ―LFLL‖), geographic names (i.e.
―LYON ST EXUPERY‖), or any other local identifiers (i.e. French INSEE number: ―69299001‖)
provided there is a recognized authority (like the WMO, INSPIRE, etc) in charge of the identifier
management. However, in all these cases, these identifiers are covered by other INSPIRE themes.

If a precise reference to a geographic identifier is required, this should be realised by a link to the
relevant thematic data model. In most cases this would be specified in feature of interest and/or
sampling features. However, a special example is the link to Environmental Monitoring Facilities to
provide information on an observing site, which could be realised in one of two ways:
 If the SpecialisedObservation is of prime importance, the observing station can be referenced
as a link to EF via Process;
 If the observing station is of prime importance, then this should be specified under the EF data
model, with the SpecialisedObservations linked hasObservation association (see air quality
use case example).
Where a precise reference to a geographic identifier is not essential, but adds useful reference
information about the observation, it can be include as part of the free-text ―name‖ property of the
Process (see below).

C) Process identifier
Although Process has an INSPIRE identifier (which is voidable), there is no special requirement to
provide this for AC-MF. Instead it is suggested that property ―name‖ property is used to hold
information on the process (and the observing site) that may be informative. For example for the long
time series of observations at Aberporth, might be assigned the name ―Climatological observation
record for WMO station 03502 (Aberporth)‖.

5.3.1.6. Geometry representation

Art. 12(1) of Regulation 1089/2010 restricts the value domain of spatial properties to the Simple
Feature spatial schema as defined in the OpenGIS® Implementation Standard for Geographic
information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture, version 1.2.1, unless specified
otherwise for a specific spatial data theme or type.

5.3.2 Feature catalogue


Feature catalogue metadata

Application Schema INSPIRE Application Schema Atmospheric Conditions and


Meteorological Geographical Features
Version number 3.0
Types defined in the feature catalogue

Type Package Stereotypes


EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological «codeList»
Geographical Features
GRIB_CodeTable4_2Value Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological «codeList»
Geographical Features
5.3.2.1. Code lists
5.3.2.1.1. EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue
EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 30
and Meteorological Geographical Features

EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue
Name: EU Air Quality Reference Component Value
Definition: Definitions of phenomena regarding air quality in the context of reporting under
Union legislation.
Extensibility: any
Identifier: http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal/codelists
Values: The allowed values for this code list comprise any values defined by data
providers.

5.3.2.1.2. GRIB_CodeTable4_2Value
GRIB_CodeTable4_2Value
Name: WMO GRIB Code Table Table 4_2 Value
Definition: Definitions of phenomena observed in meteorology.
Extensibility: any
Identifier: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I01/current
Values: The allowed values for this code list comprise any values defined by data
providers.

INSPIRE governed code lists are given in Annex C.

5.3.3 Externally governed code lists


The externally governed code lists included in this application schema are specified in the tables in
this section.

5.3.3.1. Governance and authoritative source

Code list Governance Authoritative Source


16
(incl. version and relevant subset, where applicable)
CF_StandardNa CF Govern- British Oceanographic Data Centre
mesValue ance Com-
mittee and CF
Standard
Names
Committe
(representa-
tives from
multiple data
centres)
EU_AirQualityR European European Environment Agency
eferenceCompo Environment
nentValue Agency
GRIB_CodeTab WMO World Meteorological Organisation
le4_2Value InterProgramm
e Expert Team
on data Codes
&
Representation
s (IPET-DRC)
GRIB_CodeTab WMO World Meteorological Organisation
InterProgramm

16
If no version or publication date are specified, the ―latest available version‖ shall be used.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 31
and Meteorological Geographical Features

le4_201Value e Expert Team


on data Codes
&
Representation
s (IPET-DRC)

5.3.3.2. Availability

Code list Availability Format


CF_StandardNa http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current/ SKOS/RDF,
mesValue http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/documents/cf-standard-names XML, HTML
EU_AirQualityR http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal/codelists SKOS/RDF,
eferenceCompo XML, HTML
nentValue
GRIB_CodeTab http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I01/current SKOS/RDF,
le4_2Value http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/WMOCodes/WMO306_vI2/ PDF, Zip of
LatestVERSION/LatestVERSION.html XML
GRIB_CodeTab http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I02/current SKOS/RDF,
le4_201Value http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/WMOCodes/WMO306_vI2/ PDF, Zip of
LatestVERSION/LatestVERSION.html XML

5.3.3.3. Rules for code list values

Code list Identifiers Examples


CF_StandardNa n/a http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current/CFSN0
mesValue 413
EU_AirQualityR
eferenceCompo
nentValue
GRIB_CodeTab n/a http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I01/current/0.1.1
le4_2Value
GRIB_CodeTab n/a http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I02/current/5
le4_201Value

Code list Labels Examples


CF_StandardNa The string contained in SKOS relative_humidity used for relative humidity
mesValue preflabel e.g
<skos:prefLabel>relative_humidity
</skos:prefLabel>
EU_AirQualityR
eferenceCompo
nentValue
GRIB_CodeTab The string contained in SKOS Snow depth used for snow depth
le4_2Value preflabel e.g <skos:prefLabel
xml:lang="en">Snow
depth</skos:prefLabel>
GRIB_CodeTab The string contained in SKOS Snow
le4_201Value preflabel e.g
<skos:prefLabel>Snow</skos:pref
Label>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 32
and Meteorological Geographical Features

6 Reference systems, units of measure and grids

6.1 Default reference systems, units of measure and grid


The reference systems, units of measure and geographic grid systems included in this sub-section are
the defaults to be used for all INSPIRE data sets, unless theme-specific exceptions and/or additional
requirements are defined in section 6.2.

6.1.1 Coordinate reference systems


6.1.1.1. Datum

IR Requirement
Annex II, Section 1.2
Datum for three-dimensional and two-dimensional coordinate reference systems

For the three-dimensional and two-dimensional coordinate reference systems and the horizontal
component of compound coordinate reference systems used for making spatial data sets available,
the datum shall be the datum of the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) in
areas within its geographical scope, or the datum of the International Terrestrial Reference System
(ITRS) or other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with ITRS in areas that are
outside the geographical scope of ETRS89. Compliant with the ITRS means that the system
definition is based on the definition of the ITRS and there is a well documented relationship
between both systems, according to EN ISO 19111.

6.1.1.2. Coordinate reference systems

IR Requirement
Annex II, Section 1.3
Coordinate Reference Systems

Spatial data sets shall be made available using at least one of the coordinate reference systems
specified in sections 1.3.1, 1.3.2 and 1.3.3, unless one of the conditions specified in section 1.3.4
holds.

1.3.1. Three-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems

– Three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the
parameters of the Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80) ellipsoid.
– Three-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height) based on a
datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.

1.3.2. Two-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems

– Two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude) based on a datum specified in


1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
– Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area coordinate reference
system.
– Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Conformal Conic coordinate reference system.
– Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Transverse Mercator coordinate reference system.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 33
and Meteorological Geographical Features

1.3.3. Compound Coordinate Reference Systems

1. For the horizontal component of the compound coordinate reference system, one of the
coordinate reference systems specified in section 1.3.2 shall be used.
2. For the vertical component, one of the following coordinate reference systems shall be used:
– For the vertical component on land, the European Vertical Reference System (EVRS) shall be
used to express gravity-related heights within its geographical scope. Other vertical reference
systems related to the Earth gravity field shall be used to express gravity-related heights in
areas that are outside the geographical scope of EVRS.
– For the vertical component in the free atmosphere, barometric pressure, converted to height
using ISO 2533:1975 International Standard Atmosphere, or other linear or parametric reference
systems shall be used. Where other parametric reference systems are used, these shall be
described in an accessible reference using EN ISO 19111-2:2012.
– For the vertical component in marine areas where there is an appreciable tidal range (tidal
waters), the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) shall be used as the reference surface.
– For the vertical component in marine areas without an appreciable tidal range, in open oceans
and effectively in waters that are deeper than 200 meters, the Mean Sea Level (MSL) or a well-
defined reference level close to the MSL shall be used as the reference surface.

1.3.4. Other Coordinate Reference Systems

Exceptions, where other coordinate reference systems than those listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.2 or 1.3.3 may
be used, are:

1. Other coordinate reference systems may be specified for specific spatial data themes in this
Annex.
2. For regions outside of continental Europe, Member States may define suitable coordinate
reference systems.

The geodetic codes and parameters needed to describe these coordinate reference systems and to
allow conversion and transformation operations shall be documented and an identifier shall be
created, according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127.

6.1.1.3. Display

IR Requirement
Annex II, Section 1.4
Coordinate Reference Systems used in the View Network Service

For the display of spatial data sets with the view network service as specified in Regulation No
976/2009, at least the coordinate reference systems for two-dimensional geodetic coordinates
(latitude, longitude) shall be available.

6.1.1.4. Identifiers for coordinate reference systems

IR Requirement
Annex II, Section 1.4
Coordinate Reference Systems used in the View Network Service

1. Coordinate reference system parameters and identifiers shall be managed in one or several
common registers for coordinate reference systems.
2. Only identifiers contained in a common register shall be used for referring to the coordinate
reference systems listed in this Section.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 34
and Meteorological Geographical Features

These Technical Guidelines propose to use the http URIs provided by the Open Geospatial
Consortium as coordinate reference system identifiers (see identifiers for the default CRSs below).
These are based on and redirect to the definition in the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry
(http://www.epsg-registry.org/).

TG Requirement 2 The identifiers listed in Table 2 shall be used for referring to the coordinate
reference systems used in a data set.

NOTE CRS identifiers may be used e.g. in:


– data encoding,
– data set and service metadata, and
– requests to INSPIRE network services.

Table 2. http URIs for the default coordinate reference systems

Coordinate reference system Short name http URI identifier


3D Cartesian in ETRS89 ETRS89-XYZ http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4936
3D geodetic in ETRS89 on GRS80 ETRS89-GRS80h http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4937
2D geodetic in ETRS89 on GRS80 ETRS89-GRS80 http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4258
2D LAEA projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-LAEA http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3035
GRS80
2D LCC projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-LCC http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3034
GRS80
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM26N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3038
GRS80, zone 26N (30°W to 24°W)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM27N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3039
GRS80, zone 27N (24°W to 18°W)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM28N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3040
GRS80, zone 28N (18°W to 12°W)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM29N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3041
GRS80, zone 29N (12°W to 6°W)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM30N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3042
GRS80, zone 30N (6°W to 0°)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM31N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3043
GRS80, zone 31N (0° to 6°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM32N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3044
GRS80, zone 32N (6°E to 12°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM33N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3045
GRS80, zone 33N (12°E to 18°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM34N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3046
GRS80, zone 34N (18°E to 24°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM35N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3047
GRS80, zone 35N (24°E to 30°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM36N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3048
GRS80, zone 36N (30°E to 36°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM37N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3049
GRS80, zone 37N (36°E to 42°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM38N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3050
GRS80, zone 38N (42°E to 48°E)
2D TM projection in ETRS89 on
ETRS89-TM39N http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/3051
GRS80, zone 39N (48°E to 54°E)
Height in EVRS EVRS http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/5730
3D compound: 2D geodetic in
ETRS89-GRS80-
ETRS89 on GRS80, and EVRS http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/7409
EVRS
height
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 35
and Meteorological Geographical Features

6.1.2 Temporal reference system

IR Requirement
Article 11
Temporal Reference Systems

1. The default temporal reference system referred to in point 5 of part B of the Annex to
17
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 ( ) shall be used, unless other temporal reference
systems are specified for a specific spatial data theme in Annex II.

NOTE 1 Point 5 of part B of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 (the INSPIRE
Metadata IRs) states that the default reference system shall be the Gregorian calendar, with dates
expressed in accordance with ISO 8601.

NOTE 2 ISO 8601 Data elements and interchange formats – Information interchange –
Representation of dates and times is an international standard covering the exchange of date and
time-related data. The purpose of this standard is to provide an unambiguous and well-defined method
of representing dates and times, so as to avoid misinterpretation of numeric representations of dates
and times, particularly when data is transferred between countries with different conventions for writing
numeric dates and times. The standard organizes the data so the largest temporal term (the year)
appears first in the data string and progresses to the smallest term (the second). It also provides for a
standardized method of communicating time-based information across time zones by attaching an
offset to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
th th
EXAMPLE 1997 (the year 1997), 1997-07-16 (16 July 1997), 1997-07-16T19:20:30+01:00 (16
July 1997, 19h 20‘ 30‘‘, time zone: UTC+1)

6.1.3 Units of measure

IR Requirement
Article 12
Other Requirements & Rules

(…)

2. All measurement values shall be expressed using SI units or non-SI units accepted for use with
the International System of Units, unless specified otherwise for a specific spatial data theme or
type.

6.1.4 Grids

17
OJ L 326, 4.12.2008, p. 12.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 36
and Meteorological Geographical Features

IR Requirement
Annex II, Section 2.2
Grids

Either of the grids with fixed and unambiguously defined locations defined in Sections 2.2.1 and
2.2.2 shall be used as a geo-referencing framework to make gridded data available in INSPIRE,
unless one of the following conditions holds:

(1) Other grids may be specified for specific spatial data themes in Annexes II-IV. In this case, data
exchanged using such a theme-specific grid shall use standards in which the grid definition is
either included with the data, or linked by reference.

(2) For grid referencing in regions outside of continental Europe Member States may define their
own grid based on a geodetic coordinate reference system compliant with ITRS and a Lambert
Azimuthal Equal Area projection, following the same principles as laid down for the grid
specified in Section 2.2.1. In this case, an identifier for the coordinate reference system shall be
created.

2.2 Equal Area Grid

The grid is based on the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area (ETRS89-LAEA) coordinate
o o
reference system with the centre of the projection at the point 52 N, 10 E and false easting: x0 =
4321000 m, false northing: y0 = 3210000 m.

The origin of the grid coincides with the false origin of the ETRS89-LAEA coordinate reference
system (x=0, y=0).

Grid points of grids based on ETRS89-LAEA shall coincide with grid points of the grid.

The grid is hierarchical, with resolutions of 1m, 10m, 100m, 1000m, 10000m and 100000m.

The grid orientation is south-north, west-east.

The grid is designated as Grid_ETRS89-LAEA. For identification of an individual resolution level the
cell size in metres is appended.

For the unambiguous referencing and identification of a grid cell, the cell code composed of the size
of the cell and the coordinates of the lower left cell corner in ETRS89-LAEA shall be used. The cell
size shall be denoted in metres (―m‖) for cell sizes up to 100m or kilometres (―km‖) for cell sizes of
n
1000m and above. Values for northing and easting shall be divided by 10 , where n is the number of
trailing zeros in the cell size value.

6.2 Theme-specific requirements and recommendations

6.2.1 Coordinate reference systems


Other horizontal and vertical coordinate reference systems than those listed above may only be used
for data sets containing data with position outside the continental Europe. The geodetic codes and
parameters for these coordinate reference systems should be documented, and an identifier should be
created, according to EN ISO 19111, ISO 19111-2, which is relevant to parametric coordinates and
ISO 19127. Note: WMO Commission on Basic Systems (CBS-Ext.(06) Seoul 2006) recommended
that the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) be used as the primary reference for horizontal
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 37
and Meteorological Geographical Features

positioning and the Earth Geodetic Model - EGM-96 be used as the fixed reference model for mean
sea level determination.

Recommendation 8 Thematic horizontal and vertical coordinate reference systems should be


documented, and an identifier should be created according to EN ISO
19111, ISO 19111-2 and ISO 19127.

The justifications for extending vertical coordinate reference systems are:


 Meteorological observed properties vary greatly close to the ground. Converted to heights using
ISO 2533:1975 International Standard Atmosphere lack the precision for e.g. altitude of wind
speed data near ground level. WMO code tables support altitude above ground.
 The original list of vertical coordinates reference systems refer to free atmosphere where the
effect of the surface is negligible. However, many meteorological data sets contain data for
altitudes where the effects of surface fluxes cannot be ignored. WMO code tables apply also
to data that are below the free atmosphere.
 Some applications require data sets with vertical component expressed with hybrid-levels or
pressure-levels rather than altitude/height. Without those, data ingestion becomes more
complex for e.g. atmospheric transport models and other environmental models that operate
directly on hybrid level data. Here, WMO code tables support hybrid level data.
 Plotting of meteorological charts often requires pressure-levels rather than converted altitudes.
WMO code tables support all commonly used vertical discretization schemes.
Some data sets describe atmospheric phenomena, e.g. cloud cover, with no precise altitude
information. WMO code tables should be used in these cases.

Recommendation 9 Where reference systems are not explicitly defined, WMO definitions
should be used.

Note: Although WMO definitions are not currently standardised to ISO (for example to ISO feature
catalogue form), they describe ~1500 different ‗features‘.

6.2.2 Grids

IR Requirement
Annex IV, Section 13.3
Theme-specific Requirements

(1) By way of derogation from the requirements of Section 2.2 of Annex II, gridded data related to
the themes Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features may be made
available using any appropriate grid.

7 Data quality
This chapter includes a description of the data quality elements and sub-elements as well as the
corresponding data quality measures that should be used to evaluate and document data quality for
data sets related to the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features (section 7.4).

It may also define requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable
for data sets related to the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features (sections 7.5 and 7.6).
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 38
and Meteorological Geographical Features

In particular, the data quality elements, sub-elements and measures specified in section 7.4 should be
used for
 evaluating and documenting data quality properties and constraints of spatial objects, where
such properties or constraints are defined as part of the application schema(s) (see section 5);
 evaluating and documenting data quality metadata elements of spatial data sets (see section 8);
and/or
 specifying requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable
for data sets related to the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features (see sections 7.5 and 7.6).

The descriptions of the elements and measures are based on Annex D of ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic
information – Data quality.

7.1 WMO operational quality procedures


Almost all WMO data quality issues are process based and ultimately refer to documents specifying
WMO regulations and other descriptive documents summarized in section 7.2. WMO regulations apply
globally, and not just to WMO Member States who are also EC Member States.

Meteorological measurements compliant with WMO regulations go through operational procedures:


a) To ensure the best possible quality of the data which are used in the real-time operations;
b) In non-real time, to protect and improve the quality and integrity of data destined for storage
and retrieval;
c) To provide the basis for feedback of information on errors and questionable data to the source
of the data.

Minimum standards for quality control of data apply to all WMO operational centres (cf. Manual on the
Global Data-processing and Forecasting System, WMO-No. 485). They include quality control at
various stages of processing. They apply to both real-time and non-real-time processing and lead to
various records of quality-control actions. WMO also establishes standard operating and quality
control procedures for atmospheric composition measurements (cf. WMO Global Atmosphere Watch
(GAW) report series).

Checking includes:
 Detection of missing data at centres
 Adherence to prescribed coding formats
 Internal consistency
 Time consistency
 Space consistency
 Physical and Climatological limits

Records to be maintained include:


 Information to identify source of data such as station, aircraft, ship
 Type of deficiency (non-receipt, incomplete or incorrect reports, etc.)
 Identification of deficient element (whole report, specific parameter, etc.)
 Frequency of occurrence of data deficiencies (according to station type and element)

In non real time, checking includes in addition:


 Review of recorded data in comparison with observations
 Inter-comparison of parameters and calculations
 Check of supplementary data
 Check of extreme values
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 39
and Meteorological Geographical Features

These quality reports are often held locally and not distributed with the data, which may be distributed
worldwide. There is no requirement to collect and distribute this information – which would be new
collections of data quality. Very few datasets relevant to this theme will hold or link to this quality data.

Similarly, numerical model output goes through thorough and systematic evaluation and quality
assessment. Standard procedures have been developed for the production and exchange of
verification results.

The question of the quality of meteorological data is closely related to its representivity. Depending on
the way in which it is generated, the representivity of meteorological data can vary to a very large
extent:
 in space:
2 2
o local representativeness, ranging from a few m to a few km at most, over very
homogeneous terrain
2
o wider area representativeness, up to ~100 km or more
 in time:
o so-called instantaneous data (i.e. a few seconds)
o average (or other statistical combinations) over periods of hours, days, months, etc.

Local data come from in-situ measurements and are available only for the locations of observing sites;
area representative data come mainly from
 numerical models, available for all locations
 and remote-sensing (satellite based or not).

The WMO quality assurance process is very comparable to the ISO 19158 standard on quality control
accreditation for data supply. For each Member as a supplier of observational and forecast data,
WMO acts as the client encompassing all other Members. WMO defines the observing standards and
the quality control processes at each stage of the data collection and dissemination process by which
the data is distributed around the world.

As meteorological observations are transitory there is seldom any opportunity to perform repeat
observations. Many of the Data Quality Classes of ISO 19157 are either not relevant, or rather the
quality measures required are process based using non-quantitative standards and have only
descriptive results referenced to WMO regulations and guides. Quantitative quality measures in WMO
are usually post-facto tasks of monitoring and verification. The monitoring process studies the
availability, timeliness and quality of data with respect to easily detectable errors. Verification involves
matching observations with forecast values from numerical models in a cross validation exercise.
Both are separate data gathering and product generation processes in slow time, which generate large
amounts of new data.

7.2 WMO regulations on data quality


WMO regulations on data quality are included as sub-topics in a number of different WMO standards
documents (there is no single WMO data quality reference document):

 The Guide on the Global Data-processing System (WMO-No. 305) Chapter 6 is the authoritative
reference on all matters related to quality control procedures.
 Observational data are collected to quality standards declared in the WMO Guide to
Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8 (Seventh edition
2008)).
 In the Manual on the GOS (WMO-No 544 Volume 1 Global Aspects Part V Quality Control),
WMO recommends that rigorous quality control should be exercised at all stages, including
periodic calibration, validation and maintenance of the equipment in order to maintain the
quality of the observations.
 The Manual on the Global Data-processing and Forecasting System (Volume I Global Aspects
WMO-No. 485) in Part II Section 2 defines the responsibilities and minimum standards of
Quality Control at GDPFS Centres in real- and non-real-time.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 40
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 Guidelines on quality management procedures and practices for Public Weather Services
(WMO/TD No. 1256), 2005 extends the quality aspects to the delivery of data and weather
information outside the meteorological community.
 The series of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Research and monitoring reports (e.g. Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP) for Continuous Ground Based Ozone Measurements (WMO
TD No. 634) define the quality control procedures for atmospheric composition
measurements.

There is also European legislation covering air quality;


 Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on
ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe defines data quality objectives in Annex 1
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0050:EN:NOT)

7.3 Quality recommendation


For WMO and non-WMO derived data, the general principles are likely to hold:
 datasets will not be able to repeat measurements
 quality measures are descriptive, and qualitative, not quantitative.
 in case quality reports are available they are not collected and distributed on a regular basis.
Therefore, we recommend the following:
Recommendation 10 For WMO based data the quality metadata should refer to the qualitative
process based WMO regulations for data quality

Recommendation 11 For non-WMO based data the quality metadata should refer to a statement
of quality processes used by the producer.

7.4 Data quality elements


Table 3 lists all data quality elements and sub-elements that are being used in this specification. Data
quality information can be evaluated at level of spatial object, spatial object type, dataset or dataset
series. The level at which the evaluation is performed is given in the ―Evaluation Scope‖ column.

The measures to be used for each of the listed data quality sub-elements are defined in the following
sub-sections.

Table 3 – Data quality elements used in the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features

Data quality Data quality Evaluation


Section Definition
element sub-element Scope
7.4.1 Logical Conceptual adherence to rules of the conceptual dataset series;
consistency consistency schema dataset; spatial
object type;
spatial object
7.4.2 Logical Domain adherence of values to the value dataset series;
consistency consistency domains dataset; spatial
object type;
spatial object
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 41
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 12 Where it is impossible to express the evaluation of a data quality element in


a quantitative way, the evaluation of the element should be expressed with
a textual statement as a data quality descriptive result.

7.4.1 Logical consistency – Conceptual consistency


The Application Schema conformance class of the Abstract Test Suite in Annex I defines a number of
tests to evaluate the conceptual consistency (tests A.1.1-A.1.9) of a data set.

Recommendation 13 For the tests on conceptual consistency, it is recommended to use the


Logical consistency – Conceptual consistency data quality sub-element
and the measure Number of items not compliant with the rules of the
conceptual schema as specified in the table below.

Name
Alternative name -
Data quality element logical consistency
Data quality sub-element conceptual consistency
Data quality basic measure error count
Definition count of all items in the dataset that are not compliant with the
rules of the conceptual schema
Description If the conceptual schema explicitly or implicitly describes rules,
these rules shall be followed. Violations against such rules can be,
for example, invalid placement of features within a defined
tolerance, duplication of features and invalid overlap of features.
Evaluation scope spatial object / spatial object type
Reporting scope data set
Parameter -
Data quality value type integer
Data quality value structure -
Source reference ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality
Example
Measure identifier 10

7.4.2 Logical consistency – Domain consistency


The Application Schema conformance class of the Abstract Test Suite in Annex I defines a number of
tests to evaluate the domain consistency (tests A1.10-A.1.12) of a data set.

Recommendation 14 For the tests on domain consistency, it is recommended to use the Logical
consistency – Domain consistency data quality sub-element and the
measure Number of items not in conformance with their value domain as
specified in the table below.

Name Number of items not in conformance with their value domain


Alternative name -
Data quality element logical consistency
Data quality sub-element domain consistency
Data quality basic measure error count
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 42
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Definition count of all items in the dataset that are not in conformance with their
value domain
Description
Evaluation scope spatial object / spatial object type
Reporting scope data set
Parameter -
Data quality value type integer

7.5 Minimum data quality requirements


No minimum data quality requirements are defined for the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions
and Meteorological Geographical Features.

7.6 Recommendation on data quality


No minimum data quality recommendations are defined.

8 Dataset-level metadata

This section specifies dataset-level metadata elements, which should be used for documenting
metadata for a complete dataset or dataset series.

NOTE Metadata can also be reported for each individual spatial object (spatial object-level
metadata). Spatial object-level metadata is fully described in the application schema(s) (section 5).

For some dataset-level metadata elements, in particular those for reporting data quality and
maintenance, a more specific scope can be specified. This allows the definition of metadata at sub-
dataset level, e.g. separately for each spatial object type (see instructions for the relevant metadata
element).

8.1 Metadata elements defined in INSPIRE Metadata Regulation


Table 4 gives an overview of the metadata elements specified in Regulation 1205/2008/EC
(implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
metadata).

The table contains the following information:


 The first column provides a reference to the relevant section in the Metadata Regulation,
which contains a more detailed description.
 The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
 The third column specifies the multiplicity.
 The fourth column specifies the condition, under which the given element becomes
mandatory.

Table 4 – Metadata for spatial datasets and spatial dataset series specified in Regulation
1205/2008/EC
Metadata
Regulation Metadata element Multiplicity Condition
Section
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 43
and Meteorological Geographical Features

1.1 Resource title 1

1.2 Resource abstract 1

1.3 Resource type 1

1.4 Resource locator 0..* Mandatory if a URL is available to


obtain more information on the
resource, and/or access related
services.

1.5 Unique resource identifier 1..*

1.7 Resource language 0..* Mandatory if the resource includes


textual information.

2.1 Topic category 1..*

3 Keyword 1..*

4.1 Geographic bounding box 1..*

5 Temporal reference 1..*

6.1 Lineage 1

6.2 Spatial resolution 0..* Mandatory for data sets and data set
series if an equivalent scale or a
resolution distance can be specified.

7 Conformity 1..*

8.1 Conditions for access and 1..*


use

8.2 Limitations on public 1..*


access

9 Responsible organisation 1..*

10.1 Metadata point of contact 1..*

10.2 Metadata date 1

10.3 Metadata language 1

Generic guidelines for implementing these elements using ISO 19115 and 19119 are available at
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/101. The following sections describe additional theme-
specific recommendations and requirements for implementing these elements.

8.1.1 Conformity

The Conformity metadata element defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC requires to report the
conformance with the Implementing Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services. In
addition, it may be used also to document the conformance to another specification.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 44
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 15 Dataset metadata should include a statement on the overall conformance


of the dataset with this data specification (i.e. conformance with all
requirements).

Recommendation 16 The Conformity metadata element should be used to document


conformance with this data specification (as a whole), with a specific
conformance class defined in the Abstract Test Suite in Annex A and/or
with another specification.

The Conformity element includes two sub-elements, the Specification (a citation of the Implementing
Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services or other specification), and the Degree of
conformity. The Degree can be Conformant (if the dataset is fully conformant with the cited
specification), Not Conformant (if the dataset does not conform to the cited specification) or Not
Evaluated (if the conformance has not been evaluated).

Recommendation 17 If a dataset is not yet conformant with all requirements of this data
specification, it is recommended to include information on the conformance
with the individual conformance classes specified in the Abstract Test Suite
in Annex A.

Recommendation 18 If a dataset is produced or transformed according to an external


specification that includes specific quality assurance procedures, the
conformity with this specification should be documented using the
Conformity metadata element.

Recommendation 19 If minimum data quality recommendations are defined then the statement
on the conformity with these requirements should be included using the
Conformity metadata element and referring to the relevant data quality
conformance class in the Abstract Test Suite.

NOTE Currently no minimum data quality requirements are included in the IRs. The
recommendation above should be included as a requirement in the IRs if minimum data quality
requirements are defined at some point in the future.

Recommendation 20 When documenting conformance with this data specification or one of the
conformance classes defined in the Abstract Test Suite, the Specification
sub-element should be given using the http URI identifier of the
conformance class or using a citation including the following elements:
- title: ―INSPIRE Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines – <name of
the conformance class>‖
- date:
- dateType: publication
- date: 2013-02-04

EXAMPLE 1: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for
documenting conformance with the whole data specification on Addresses v3.0.1.

<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/tg" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>

or (using a citation):
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 45
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-02-04</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode
codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode"
codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>

EXAMPLE 2: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for
documenting conformance with the CRS conformance class of the data specification on Addresses
v3.0.1.

<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/crs" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>

or (using a citation):

<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and
Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines – CRS</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-02-04</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode
codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode"
codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 46
and Meteorological Geographical Features

8.1.2 Lineage

Recommendation 21 Following the ISO/DIS 19157 Quality principles, if a data provider has a
procedure for the quality management of their spatial data sets then the
appropriate data quality elements and measures defined in ISO/DIS 19157
should be used to evaluate and report (in the metadata) the results. If not,
the Lineage metadata element (defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC)
should be used to describe the overall quality of a spatial data set.

According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, lineage ―is a statement on process history and/or overall
quality of the spatial data set. Where appropriate it may include a statement whether the data set has
been validated or quality assured, whether it is the official version (if multiple versions exist), and
whether it has legal validity. The value domain of this metadata element is free text‖.

The Metadata Technical Guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119 specifies that the
statement sub-element of LI_Lineage (EN ISO 19115) should be used to implement the lineage
metadata element.

Recommendation 22 To describe the transformation steps and related source data, it is


recommended to use the following sub-elements of LI_Lineage:
- For the description of the transformation process of the local to the
common INSPIRE data structures, the LI_ProcessStep sub-element
should be used.
- For the description of the source data the LI_Source sub-element should
be used.

NOTE 1 In order to improve the interoperability, domain templates and instructions for using these
free text elements (descriptive statements) may be specified here and/or in an Annex of this data
specification.

8.1.3 Temporal reference

According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, at least one of the following temporal reference metadata sub-
elements shall be provided: temporal extent, date of publication, date of last revision, date of creation.

Recommendation 23 It is recommended that at least the date of the last revision of a spatial data
set should be reported using the Date of last revision metadata sub-
element.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 47
and Meteorological Geographical Features

8.2 Metadata elements for interoperability

IR Requirement
Article 13
Metadata required for Interoperability

The metadata describing a spatial data set shall include the following metadata elements required
for interoperability:

1. Coordinate Reference System: Description of the coordinate reference system(s) used in the
data set.

2. Temporal Reference System: Description of the temporal reference system(s) used in the data
set.

This element is mandatory only if the spatial data set contains temporal information that does
not refer to the default temporal reference system.

3. Encoding: Description of the computer language construct(s) specifying the representation of


data objects in a record, file, message, storage device or transmission channel.

4. Topological Consistency: Correctness of the explicitly encoded topological characteristics of the


data set as described by the scope.

This element is mandatory only if the data set includes types from the Generic Network Model
and does not assure centreline topology (connectivity of centrelines) for the network.

5. Character Encoding: The character encoding used in the data set.

This element is mandatory only if an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8.

6. Spatial Representation Type: The method used to spatially represent geographic information.

These Technical Guidelines propose to implement the required metadata elements based on ISO
19115 and ISO/TS 19139.

The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with the proposed encoding.

TG Requirement 3 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the
used ISO 19139 XML schema.

NOTE Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML
schemas that are currently available.

TG Requirement 4 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall contain the elements and meet the
INSPIRE multiplicity specified in the sections below.

TG Requirement 5 The elements specified below shall be available in the specified ISO/TS
19139 path.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 48
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 24 The metadata elements for interoperability should be made available


together with the metadata elements defined in the Metadata Regulation
through an INSPIRE discovery service.

NOTE While this not explicitly required by any of the INSPIRE Implementing Rules, making all
metadata of a data set available together and through one service simplifies implementation and
usability.

8.2.1 Coordinate Reference System


Metadata element name Coordinate Reference System
Description of the coordinate reference system used in the
Definition
dataset.
ISO 19115 number and name 13. referenceSystemInfo
ISO/TS 19139 path referenceSystemInfo
INSPIRE obligation / condition mandatory
INSPIRE multiplicity 1..*
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) 186. MD_ReferenceSystem
To identify the reference system, the referenceSystemIdentifier
(RS_Identifier) shall be provided.

Domain NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined


values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be
agreed among Member States during the implementation phase
to support interoperability.
Implementing instructions
referenceSystemIdentifier:
Example code: ETRS_89
codeSpace: INSPIRE RS registry
<gmd:referenceSystemInfo>
<gmd:MD_ReferenceSystem>
<gmd:referenceSystemIdentifier>
<gmd:RS_Identifier>
<gmd:code>
<gco:CharacterString>ETRS89
</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:code>
Example XML encoding
<gmd:codeSpace>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE RS
registry</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:codeSpace>
</gmd:RS_Identifier>
</gmd:referenceSystemIdentifier>
</gmd:MD_ReferenceSystem>
</gmd:referenceSystemInfo>
Comments

8.2.2 Temporal Reference System


Metadata element name Temporal Reference System
Description of the temporal reference systems used in the
Definition
dataset.
ISO 19115 number and name 13. referenceSystemInfo
ISO/TS 19139 path referenceSystemInfo
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 49
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Mandatory, if the spatial data set or one of its feature types


INSPIRE obligation / condition contains temporal information that does not refer to the Gregorian
Calendar or the Coordinated Universal Time.
INSPIRE multiplicity 0..*
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) 186. MD_ReferenceSystem
No specific type is defined in ISO 19115 for temporal reference
systems. Thus, the generic MD_ReferenceSystem element and its
reference SystemIdentifier (RS_Identifier) property shall be
provided.
Domain
NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined
values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be
agreed among Member States during the implementation phase
to support interoperability.
Implementing instructions
referenceSystemIdentifier:
Example code: GregorianCalendar
codeSpace: INSPIRE RS registry
<gmd:referenceSystemInfo>
<gmd:MD_ReferenceSystem>
<gmd:referenceSystemIdentifier>
<gmd:RS_Identifier>
<gmd:code>
<gco:CharacterString>GregorianCalendar
</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:code>
Example XML encoding
<gmd:codeSpace>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE RS
registry</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:codeSpace>
</gmd:RS_Identifier>
</gmd:referenceSystemIdentifier>
</gmd:MD_ReferenceSystem>
</gmd:referenceSystemInfo>
Comments

8.2.3 Encoding
Metadata element name Encoding
Description of the computer language construct that specifies the
Definition representation of data objects in a record, file, message, storage
device or transmission channel
ISO 19115 number and name 271. distributionFormat
ISO/TS 19139 path distributionInfo/MD_Distribution/distributionFormat
INSPIRE obligation / condition mandatory
INSPIRE multiplicity 1..*
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) 284. MD_Format
See B.2.10.4. The property values (name, version, specification)
Domain specified in section 5 shall be used to document the default and
alternative encodings.
Implementing instructions
name: <Application schema name> GML application schema
version: version 3.0
Example specification: D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on Atmospheric
Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features – Technical
Guidelines
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 50
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<gmd:MD_Format>
<gmd:name>
<gco:CharacterString>SomeApplicationSchema GML
application schema</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:name>
<gmd:version>
<gco:CharacterString>3.0</gco:CharacterString>
Example XML encoding
</gmd:version>
<gmd:specification>
<gco:CharacterString>D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on
Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features – Technical Guidelines</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:specification>
</gmd:MD_Format>
Comments

8.2.4 Character Encoding


Metadata element name Character Encoding
Definition The character encoding used in the data set.
ISO 19115 number and name
ISO/TS 19139 path
INSPIRE obligation / condition Mandatory, if an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8.
INSPIRE multiplicity 0..*
Data type (and ISO 19115
no.)
Domain
Implementing instructions
Example -
<gmd:characterSet>
<gmd:MD_CharacterSetCode codeListValue="8859part2"
codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/I
Example XML encoding
SO_19139_Schemas/resources/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#C
haracterSetCode">8859-2</gmd:MD_CharacterSetCode>
</gmd:characterSet>
Comments

8.2.5 Spatial representation type


Metadata element name Spatial representation type
Definition The method used to spatially represent geographic information.
ISO 19115 number and name 37. spatialRepresentationType
ISO/TS 19139 path
INSPIRE obligation / condition Mandatory
INSPIRE multiplicity 1..*
Data type (and ISO 19115
B.5.26 MD_SpatialRepresentationTypeCode
no.)
Domain
Of the values included in the code list in ISO 19115 (vector, grid,
textTable, tin, stereoModel, video), only vector, grid and tin should
be used.
Implementing instructions
NOTE Additional code list values may be defined based on
feedback from implementation.
Example -
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 51
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Example XML encoding


Comments

8.2.6 Data Quality – Logical Consistency – Topological Consistency


See section 8.3.2 for instructions on how to implement metadata elements for reporting data quality.

8.3 Recommended theme-specific metadata elements

Recommendation 25 The metadata describing a spatial data set or a spatial data set series
related to the theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features should comprise the theme-specific metadata
elements specified in Table 5.

The table contains the following information:


 The first column provides a reference to a more detailed description.
 The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
 The third column specifies the multiplicity.

Table 5 – Optional theme-specific metadata elements for the theme Atmospheric Conditions
and Meteorological Geographical Features
Section Metadata element Multiplicity
8.3.1 Maintenance Information 0..1

8.3.2 Logical Consistency – Conceptual Consistency 0..*

8.3.2 Logical Consistency – Domain Consistency 0..*

Recommendation 26 For implementing the metadata elements included in this section using ISO
19115, ISO/DIS 19157 and ISO/TS 19139, the instructions included in the
relevant sub-sections should be followed.

8.3.1 Maintenance Information


Metadata element name Maintenance information
Definition Information about the scope and frequency of updating
ISO 19115 number and name 30. resourceMaintenance
ISO/TS 19139 path identificationInfo/MD_Identification/resourceMaintenance
INSPIRE obligation / condition optional
INSPIRE multiplicity 0..1
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) 142. MD_MaintenanceInformation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 52
and Meteorological Geographical Features

This is a complex type (lines 143-148 from ISO 19115).


At least the following elements should be used (the multiplicity
according to ISO 19115 is shown in parentheses):
 maintenanceAndUpdateFrequency [1]: frequency with which
changes and additions are made to the resource after the
initial resource is completed / domain value:
Domain
MD_MaintenanceFrequencyCode:
 updateScope [0..*]: scope of data to which maintenance is
applied / domain value: MD_ScopeCode
 maintenanceNote [0..*]: information regarding specific
requirements for maintaining the resource / domain value: free
text
Implementing instructions
Example
Example XML encoding
Comments

8.3.2 Metadata elements for reporting data quality

Recommendation 27 For reporting the results of the data quality evaluation, the data quality
elements, sub-elements and (for quantitative evaluation) measures defined
in chapter 7 should be used.

Recommendation 28 The metadata elements specified in the following sections should be used
to report the results of the data quality evaluation. At least the information
included in the row ―Implementation instructions‖ should be provided.

The first section applies to reporting quantitative results (using the element DQ_QuantitativeResult),
while the second section applies to reporting non-quantitative results (using the element
DQ_DescriptiveResult).

Recommendation 29 If a dataset does not pass the tests of the Application schema conformance
class (defined in Annex A), the results of each test should be reported
using one of the options described in sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2.

NOTE 1 If using non-quantitative description, the results of several tests do not have to be reported
separately, but may be combined into one descriptive statement.

NOTE 2 The sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2 may need to be updated once the XML schemas for ISO
19157 have been finalised.

The scope for reporting may be different from the scope for evaluating data quality (see section 7). If
data quality is reported at the data set or spatial object type level, the results are usually derived or
aggregated.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 53
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Recommendation 30 The scope element (of type DQ_Scope) of the DQ_DataQuality subtype
should be used to encode the reporting scope.

Only the following values should be used for the level element of
DQ_Scope: Series, Dataset, featureType.

If the level is featureType the


levelDescription/MDScopeDescription/features element (of type Set<
GF_FeatureType>) shall be used to list the feature type names.

NOTE In the level element of DQ_Scope, the value featureType is used to denote spatial object
type.

8.3.2.1. Guidelines for reporting quantitative results of the data quality evaluation

Metadata element name See chapter 7


Definition See chapter 7
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name 3. report
ISO/TS 19139 path dataQualityInfo/*/report
INSPIRE obligation / condition optional
INSPIRE multiplicity 0..*
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g.
no.) 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission
Lines 7-9 from ISO/DIS 19157
7. DQ_MeasureReference (C.2.1.3)
Domain
8. DQ_EvaluationMethod (C.2.1.4.)
9. DQ_Result (C2.1.5.)
39. nameOfMeasure

NOTE This should be the name as defined in Chapter 7.

42. evaluationMethodType

43. evaluationMethodDescription

NOTE If the reported data quality results are derived or


aggregated (i.e. the scope levels for evaluation and reporting
are different), the derivation or aggregation should also be
Implementing instructions specified using this property.

46. dateTime

NOTE This should be data or range of dates on which the


data quality measure was applied.

63. DQ_QuantitativeResult / 64. value

NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_QuantitativeResult


and the value(s) represent(s) the application of the data quality
measure (39.) using the specified evaluation method (42-43.)
See Table E.12 — Reporting commission as metadata
Example
(ISO/DIS 19157)
Example XML encoding

8.3.2.2. Guidelines for reporting descriptive results of the Data Quality evaluation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 54
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Metadata element name See chapter 7


Definition See chapter 7
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name 3. report
ISO/TS 19139 path dataQualityInfo/*/report
INSPIRE obligation / condition optional
INSPIRE multiplicity 0..*
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g.
no.) 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission
Line 9 from ISO/DIS 19157
Domain
9. DQ_Result (C2.1.5.)
67. DQ_DescripitveResult / 68. statement

Implementing instructions NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_DescriptiveResult


and in the statement (68.) the evaluation of the selected DQ
sub-element should be expressed in a narrative way.
See Table E.15 — Reporting descriptive result as metadata
Example
(ISO/DIS 19157)
Example XML encoding

9 Delivery

9.1 Updates

IR Requirement
Article 8
Updates

1. Member States shall make available updates of data on a regular basis.


2. All updates shall be made available at the latest 6 months after the change was applied in the
source data set, unless a different period is specified for a specific spatial data theme in Annex
II.

NOTE In this data specification, no exception is specified, so all updates shall be made available at
the latest 6 months after the change was applied in the source data set.

9.2 Delivery medium


According to Article 11(1) of the INSPIRE Directive, Member States shall establish and operate a
network of services for INSPIRE spatial data sets and services. The relevant network service types for
making spatial data available are:
- view services making it possible, as a minimum, to display, navigate, zoom in/out, pan, or overlay
viewable spatial data sets and to display legend information and any relevant content of metadata;
- download services, enabling copies of spatial data sets, or parts of such sets, to be downloaded
and, where practicable, accessed directly;
- transformation services, enabling spatial data sets to be transformed with a view to achieving
interoperability.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 55
and Meteorological Geographical Features

NOTE For the relevant requirements and recommendations for network services, see the relevant
18
Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines .

EXAMPLE 1 Through the Get Spatial Objects function, a download service can either download a pre-
defined data set or pre-defined part of a data set (non-direct access download service), or give direct
access to the spatial objects contained in the data set, and download selections of spatial objects
based upon a query (direct access download service). To execute such a request, some of the
following information might be required:
 the list of spatial object types and/or predefined data sets that are offered by the download
service (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation),
 and the query capabilities section advertising the types of predicates that may be used to form
a query expression (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation,
where applicable),
 a description of spatial object types offered by a download service instance (to be provided
through the Describe Spatial Object Types operation).

EXAMPLE 2 Through the Transform function, a transformation service carries out data content
transformations from native data forms to the INSPIRE-compliant form and vice versa. If this operation
is directly called by an application to transform source data (e.g. obtained through a download service)
that is not yet conformant with this data specification, the following parameters are required:
Input data (mandatory). The data set to be transformed.
 Source model (mandatory, if cannot be determined from the input data). The model in which the
input data is provided.
 Target model (mandatory). The model in which the results are expected.
 Model mapping (mandatory, unless a default exists). Detailed description of how the
transformation is to be carried out.

It should be noted here that the actual INSPIRE Download Service implementation details and
guidance is out-of-scope of this document. This section only aims to provide guidance and
requirements on the content of the delivered INSPIRE AC-MF data sets.

The O&M model, as well as the large and frequently changing gridded data sets typical for AC-MF
themes, require specific technical guidance by the INSPIRE Network Services Drafting Team. Without
such clear guidance it will be difficult to achieve the INSPIRE interoperability goals in issues like
• recommended Download Service protocols,
• the use of effective binary encodings for large gridded data sets, and
• the data instance level discovery of frequently updated data, such as weather forecasts.

As of writing this document, this kind of guidance has not been provided in the existing versions of
Download Service Technical Guidance documents, so unfortunately a reference to it cannot be
provided here.

9.3 Encodings
The IRs contain the following two requirements for the encoding to be used to make data available.

18
The Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines on INSPIRE Network Services are available at
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/5
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 56
and Meteorological Geographical Features

IR Requirement
Article 7
Encoding

1. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall conform to EN ISO 19118. In particular, it
shall specify schema conversion rules for all spatial object types and all attributes and
association roles and the output data structure used.
2. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall be made available.

NOTE ISO 19118:2011 specifies the requirements for defining encoding rules used for interchange
of geographic data within the set of International Standards known as the ―ISO 19100 series‖. An
encoding rule allows geographic information defined by application schemas and standardized
schemas to be coded into a system-independent data structure suitable for transport and storage. The
encoding rule specifies the types of data being coded and the syntax, structure and coding schemes
used in the resulting data structure. Specifically, ISO 19118:2011 includes
- requirements for creating encoding rules based on UML schemas,
- requirements for creating encoding services, and
- requirements for XML-based encoding rules for neutral interchange of data.

While the IRs do not oblige the usage of a specific encoding, this Technical Guidelines proposes to
make data related to the spatial data theme Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features available at least in the default encoding(s) specified in section 0. In this section, a number of
TG requirements are listed that need to be met in order to be conformant with the default encoding(s).

The proposed default encoding(s) meet the requirements in Article 7 of the IRs, i.e. they are
conformant with ISO 19118 and (since they are included in this specification) publicly available.

As defined in the Implementing Rules of INSPIRE Download Services, there are two possibilities for
implementing an INSPIRE Download Service: offering pre-defined data sets for download or providing
a "direct access" download service with query capabilities. In either case the data sets in the INSPIRE
Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Feature themes are collections of
Specialised Observation features as defined in the INSPIRE Specialised Observations GML
Application Schema.

IR Requirement
Annex IV, Section 13.3
Theme-specific Requirements

Data related to the themes Atmospheric Conditions or Meteorological Geographical Features shall
be made available using the types defined in Specialised Observations package in Annex I, the
OM_Observation spatial object type or sub-types thereof.

These collections served using an INSPIRE Download Service can be either pre-defined using
semantic grouping (like all measurement events with all measured properties from a single
meteorological observation station within one day), or be created ad-hoc as a result of the given
selection criteria for the Get Spatial Objects function of a direct-access Download Service.

The following table gives examples of which type of Specialised Observations is most appropriate to
be used with typical of meteorological and atmospheric data sets:

Specialized Observation Type AC-MF data examples


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 57
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Specialized Observation Type AC-MF data examples

GridObservation Gridded measurement & forecast data with regular


(rectified) or non-regular (referenceable) grid coverage
result for a single (nominal) instance of time. A gridded
forecast produced by a numerical weather model for a
single instance of time. A gridded precipitation
measurement for a single (nominal) time instant based
on weather radar data.

PointObservation Measurement or forecast data for single spatial location


and for a single (nominal) instance of time. A SYNOP
station observation for a set of basic observable
properties (temperature, pressure, etc.)

ProfileObservation An (nominally) instantaneous measurement or forecast


made a various points along a vertical profile in
atmosphere. Radiosonde sounding or a simulated,
numerical weather model based sounding (if considered
instantaneous and directly up). Atmospheric profile data
produced by various remote sensing instruments.

TrajectoryObservation A measurement or simulation result providing data at


various points along a curve geometry in atmosphere,
each made at or simulating a different instant of time.
The time instances along the geometry form a
monotonous series. Radiosonde or other airborne
measurement with a spatial and temporal values for each
point along the curve.

PointTimeSeriesObservation Measurement or forecast data for single spatial location


and multiple (nominal) instances of time (a time series).
Time series of an automatic weather station (AWS)
observation for a set of basic observable properties
(temperature, pressure, etc.)

GridSeriesObservation Gridded measurement & forecast data with regular


(rectified) or non-regular (referenceable) grid coverage
result for multiple (nominal) instances of time. A gridded
forecast produced by a numerical weather model with
more than one time step. A gridded precipitation
measurement for more than one (nominal) time instances
based on weather radar data and with corrections based
on ground observation data.

MultiPointObservation Measurement or forecast data for multiple spatial


locations and for a single (nominal) instance of time. A
collection of SYNOP station observations for a single
country or other region for a set of basic observable
properties (temperature, pressure, etc.)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 58
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Specialized Observation Type AC-MF data examples

PointObservationCollection A collection of separately made PointObservations


grouped semantically (same instrument, same
measurement campaign etc.). Note that in most cases
this is not needed, because the Get Spatial Objects
operation must always return a collection of
OM_Observation instances. If used, that collection
contains sub-collections of PointObservation instances.

9.3.1 Default Encoding(s)

9.3.1.1. Specific requirements for GML encoding

This data specification proposes the use of GML as the default encoding, as recommended in sections
7.2 and 7.3 of [DS-D2.7]. GML is an XML encoding in compliance with ISO 19118, as required in Article
7(1). For details, see [ISO 19136], and in particular Annex E (UML-to-GML application schema encoding
rules).

The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with GML encodings.

TG Requirement 6 Data instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the
provided XML schema.

NOTE 1 Not all constraints defined in the application schemas can be mapped to XML. Therefore, the
following requirement is necessary.

NOTE 2 The obligation to use only the allowed code list values specified for attributes and most of the
constraints defined in the application schemas cannot be mapped to the XML sch. They can therefore
not be enforced through schema validation. It may be possible to express some of these constraints
using other schema or rule languages (e.g. Schematron), in order to enable automatic validation.

9.3.1.2. Default encoding(s) for application schema Atmospheric Conditions and


Meteorological Geographical Features

Name: Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features GML Application


Schema
Version: 3.0,
Specification: D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines
Character set: UTF-8

All the AC-MF data offered using INSPIRE Download Services must follow this GML Application
Schema for encoding the Observation instances within the feature collection results of the Get Spatial
Objects operations.

The xml schema document is available on the INSPIRE website http://inspire.ec.europa.eu

Name: Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features GML Application


Schema (for the coverage domain)
Version: version 3.0, OGC Coverages version 1.0.0
Specification: D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological
Geographical Features – Technical Guidelines; OGC GML Application Schema – Coverages [OGC
09-146r2]
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 59
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Character set: UTF-8

All the AC-MF data offered using INSPIRE Download Services providing data using the Specialised
Observation types with coverage valued results, must follow this GML Application Schema for
encoding at least the domain parts of those coverages.

The xml schema document is available from http://schemas.opengis.net/gmlcov/1.0/.

9.3.1.2.1. Encoding rules used

Introducing encoding formats other than GML for representing coverage elements requires the
definition of encoding rules to map the Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features application schema to the resulting specific data structure unambiguously.

Recommendation 31 The encoding of coverage components in the file formats specified above
should conform to the rules specified in <reference to Annex or (later)
D2.7>.

NOTE The GeoTiff format, as a specific extension of the Baseline TIFF Format, is also covered by
these encoding rules.

9.3.2 Recommended Encoding(s)


No recommendations for alternative encodings are offered in the data specification, due to resource
limitations available. However, the benefit of having a pure binary encoding for AC-MF data is
acknowledged, and it is hoped that in the future the community will develop best practice for a small
number of such encoding; specifically, netCDF and GRIB. NetCDF already offers the possibility of
directly adding the INSPIRE metadata to the file, as an additional metadata convention. Work is
currently underway to develop a GRIB3 standard, which it is hoped can be made O&M (and INSPIRE)
compliant.

9.4 Options for delivering coverage data


For coverages, different encodings may be used for the domain and the range of the coverage. There
are several options for packaging the domain and range encoding when delivering coverage data
19
through a download service, as discussed below .

Multipart representation

For performance reasons, binary file formats are usually preferred to text-based formats such as XML
for storing large amounts of coverage data. However, they cannot directly constitute an alternative to
pure GML, since their own data structure might often not support all the ISO 19123 elements used to
describe coverages in the conceptual model.

The OGC standard GML Application Schema for coverages [OGC 09-146r2] offers a format encoding
which combines these two approaches. The first part consists of a GML document representing all
coverage components except the range set, which is contained in the second part in some other
encoding format such as ‗well known‘ binary formats‘. Some information in the second part may be
redundant with the GML content of the first part. In this case, consistency must be necessarily
ensured, for example by defining a GML mapping of the additional encoding format.

19
Further details and examples will be included in a future version of the Guidelines for the encoding
of spatial data [DS-D2.7].
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 60
and Meteorological Geographical Features

The advantage of this multipart representation is that coverage constituents are not handled
individually but as a whole. This is not really the case with GML which also allows the encoding of the
value side of the coverage in external binary files, but via references to remote locations.

TG Requirement 7 Coverage data encoded as multipart messages shall comply with the multipart
representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for
Coverages [OGC 09-146r2].

NOTE The GML Application Schema for Coverages establishes a one-to-one relationship between
coverages and multipart document instances.

Reference to an external file

The range set can be encoded within the XML structure as an external binary file using the gml:File
element. This has the benefit of efficiently storing the range set data within an external file that is of a
well-known format type, for example TIFF or GeoTIFF. This method of encoding is of most use for the
storage of large files.

Encoding the range inline

This option encodes the range set data within the XML inline. This is encoded as a DataBlock
element. This encoding provides much greater visibility for the range set values, however, this comes
at the cost of reduced efficiency. This method of encoding would therefore only be suitable for small
datasets.

Encoding the domain inside a JPEG 2000 file

This option consists in packaging all the components of one or several coverages, including the
domain expressed in GML, in a single JPEG 2000 file. It is based on the OGC standard GML in JPEG
2000 for Geographic Imagery [OGC 05-047r2], also known as GMLJP2, which specifies how to use
GML within the XML boxes of JPEG 2000 files.

TG Requirement 8 Coverage data encoded in standalone JPEG 2000 files shall comply with the
OGC standard GML in JPEG 2000 for Geographic Imagery [OGC 05-047r2].

TG Requirement 8 implies that all the encoding rules presented in GMLJP2 shall be strictly followed
for including GML within JPEG 2000 data files correctly. For the sake of harmonization, the encoding
rules adopted for the multipart message encoding should also apply to the GMLJP2 encoding.

The encoding of coverage components in GMLJP2 within a JPEG 2000 file should conform to the
rules specified in the Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data [DS-D2.7].

10 Data Capture
There is no specific guidance required with respect to data capture.

11 Portrayal
This clause defines the rules for layers and styles to be used for portrayal of the spatial object types
defined for this theme. Portrayal is regulated in Article 14 of the IRs.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 61
and Meteorological Geographical Features

IR Requirement
Article 14
Portrayal

1. For the portrayal of spatial data sets using a view network service as specified in Commission
20
Regulation No 976/2009 ( ), the following shall be available:
(a) the layers specified in Annex II for the theme or themes the data set is related to;
(b) for each layer at least a default portrayal style, with as a minimum an associated title and a
unique identifier.

2. For each layer, Annex II defines the following:


(a) a human readable title of the layer to be used for display in user interface;
(b) the spatial object type(s), or sub-set thereof, that constitute(s) the content of the layer.

In section 11.1, the types of layers are defined that are to be used for the portrayal of the spatial object
types defined in this specification. A view service may offer several layers of the same type, one for
each dataset that it offers data on a specific topic.

NOTE The layer specification in the IRs only contains the name, a human readable title and the
(subset(s) of) spatial object type(s), that constitute(s) the content of the layer. In addition, this TG
documents suggests keywords for describing the layer.

Recommendation 32 It is recommended to use the keywords specified in section 11.1 in the


Layers Metadata parameters of the INSPIRE View service (see Annex III,
Part A, section 2.2.4 in Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009).

Section 11.2 specifies one style for each of these layers. It is proposed that INSPIRE view services
support this style as the default style required by Article 14(1b).

TG Requirement 9 For each layer specified in this section, the styles defined in section 11.2 shall
be available.

NOTE The default style should be used for portrayal by the view network service if no user-defined
style is specified in a portrayal request for a specific layer.

In section 11.2, further styles can be specified that represent examples of styles typically used in a
thematic domain. It is recommended that also these styles should be supported by INSPIRE view
services, where applicable.

Recommendation 33 In addition, it is recommended that, where applicable, INSPIRE view


services also support the styles defined in section 11.2.

Where XML fragments are used in the following sections, the following namespace prefixes apply:
 sld="http://www.opengis.net/sld" (WMS/SLD 1.1)
 se="http://www.opengis.net/se" (SE 1.1)
 ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc" (FE 1.1)

11.1 Layers to be provided by INSPIRE view services

20
OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 9.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 62
and Meteorological Geographical Features

No layers are specified for the themes Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical
Features.

The generic data model used for defining spatial objects for the AC-MF theme is based on the
Observations & Measurements standard (O&M, ISO 19156:2011). Each O&M Observation instance
models an observation event for estimating the values one or more atmospherically meaningful
properties at a particular place and time (past or future at the time of making the observation). These
Observation events are the only spatial objects of the AC-MF data model.
The layers provided by an INSPIRE View Service offering AC-MF data sets typically do not try to
visualise the geometries or temporal properties of O&M Observation events, or their features-of-
interest, but the results of these Observation events. These result objects are typically modelled as
discrete coverages.
21
The Technical Guidance for the implementation of INSPIRE View Services, version 3.0 contains the
following requirement considering the Name property of the INSPIRE View Service:

"Implementation Requirement 39 Name shall be mapped with the <wms:Name> element. The
harmonised name of a layer shall comply with the Layer requirements of the [INS DS, Article 14]"

However, the annex II of referred EU Commission regulation only defines the layer names for
INSPIRE Annex I themes. The intended relationship between INSPIRE datasets and the View Service
22
layers are further defined in the Draft Implementing Rule View Service, version 3.0 :

"An INSPIRE theme may include several layers, such as the ―transport theme‖,
and for each INSPIRE theme the related layer(s) shall be defined. They have the
same title but in various languages (read by humans) across all the MS.
They shall have the same name (read by machines, eventually keywords from a
controlled list corresponding to data themes) across Europe so that it will be
possible for a client application to ask to several View Services one specific layer
(using the ―harmonised‖ name). This harmonised name is given by Data
Specification Implementing Rules for each INSPIRE theme."

All spatial objects of the AC-MF theme consist of O&M Observation objects, regardless of the types of
the contained estimated properties, like precipitation or wind speed. Thus it's not useful from the end-
user perspective to follow the harmonised layer naming convention of the Annex I and II consisting of
a theme-specific prefix followed by the name of the spatial object type (like GN.GeographicalNames).
If the harmonised naming convention mentioned above would be followed, all the layers would be
either of type "ACMF.OM Observation", with no indication of the actual data content visualised by the
layer.
The requirement for using harmonised layer names for the AC-MF View Services is not just non-
informational, but would also cause serious implementation difficulties for the data providers. In many
cases the same service instances used for providing the INSPIRE View Services are also used for
providing the same data for fulfilling other national or EU level regulations and data exchange
agreements. In these cases the layer names may also be specified by those agreements, or the use of
names descriptive in all the involved contexts is required.

Recommendation 34 Providers of INSPIRE View Services for Atmospheric Conditions compliant


spatial data are free to use any text as values of the Name properties for
the provided layers. The use of theme-specific INSPIRE harmonised layer
names is not required for AC-MF data sets.

21 Technical Guidance for the implementation of INSPIRE View Services,


http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Network_Services/TechnicalGuidance_ViewServices_v3.0.pdf
22 D3.7.2 Draft Implementing Rules for View Services,
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reports/ImplementingRules/network/D3.7.2_Draft_IR_View_Services_v3.0.pdf
, page 9
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 63
and Meteorological Geographical Features

It's still very important to be able to ensure the interoperability of the AC-MF View Services, even when
harmonised layer names cannot be used for that purpose: The users of the View Services of different
providers should be able to find out which layers (if any) provided by both providers offer visualisations
of the same measured or predicted atmospheric properties. This need of using harmonised property
names between different data providers has been widely recognised in the scientific community, and
several well-know code lists and standardised parameter name lists are currently in use, such as the
WMO GRIB codes , Climate Forecast Conventions (CF) Standard names and the NASA Semantic
Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET) Ontology classes.

Recommendation 35 For INSPIRE View Services for Atmospheric Conditions theme


implemented using OGC WMS 1.3, it is recommended to use the layer
specific "Keyword" elements to provide detailed information about the
atmospheric properties visualised by the layer. More than one Keyword
element with a different "vocabulary" attribute per layer may be used for
referring to alternative sources of property definitions.

Recommendation 36 Each layer should include at least one Keyword element with its
"vocabulary" attribute referring to a well-know catalog, dictionary or another
machine-readable online source providing a non-ambiguous definition of
the underlying atmospheric property visualised as that layer.

The Keyword approach allows the users of AC-MF View Services to recognise the basic geophysical
properties, like air temperature, behind each View Service layer, even if the exact definition of the the
property would be a complicated one (monthly mean of the daily maximum of the air temperature
measurements at 10m height from the ground).

Example: A WMS 1.3 Capabilities document fragment with atmospheric properties for each
layer identified by Keyword elements

<wms:WMS_Capabilities version="1.3.0" xmlns:wms=”http://www.opengis.net/wms>


...
<wms:Capability>
...
<wms:Layer>
<wms:Title>Latest ECMWF Deterministic Model Run</wms:Title>
<wms:Layer>
<wms:Name>[any name appropriate in the usage context]</wms:Name>
<wms:Title>[any human-readable, localized title]</wms:Title>
<KeywordList>
<Keyword vocabulary=" urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-name:WMO:GRIB-code:2010">001</Keyword>
<Keyword vocabulary=" urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-name:cf-standard-name:1.6">air_pressure</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
<MetadataURL type="ISO-19115:2003">
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=95
558944&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
</MetadataURL>
</wms:Layer>
<wms:Layer>
<wms:Name>[any name appropriate in the usage context]</wms:Name>
<wms:Title>[any human-readable, localized title]</wms:Title>
<KeywordList>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-names:WMO:GRIB-code:GRIB:2010">011</Keyword>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-name:cf-standard-name:1.6">air_temperature</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
<MetadataURL type="ISO-19115:2003">
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 64
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=95
558944&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
</MetadataURL>
</wms:Layer>
</wms:Layer>
</wms:Capability>
</wms:WMS_Capabilities>

The names used as values of the "vocabulary" attribute for theses keywords should be commonly
standardised among the AC-MF INSPIRE user community and a machine-readable metadata
description for each of them should be accessible at well-known community catalogs or registries. The
allowed values for the values of the vocabulary attribute is not restricted by this document, because
this would make the specification too inflexible. However, to encourage harmonisation, two standard
vocabularies are recommended here pointing to well-known atmospheric property name definitions:
the WMO GRIB codes and the CF convention standard-names:

Recommendation 37 If a layer of an INSPIRE View Service for AC-MF datasets visualises a


geophysical property that has name in GRIB Code and Flag table 4.2
defined in the WMO Manual of Codes4, it should contain a "Keyword"
element with a vocabulary attribute value identifiable with the WMO GRIB
codes . If this vocabulary is used, the value of the Keyword element must
be the numerical GRIB code for the corresponding property as a string with
possible leading zeros.

Recommendation 38 If an INSPIRE View Service layer visualises a geophysical property that


has name in CF Conventions Standard Names, it should contain a
"Keyword" element with the vocabulary attribute value identifiable with CF
Standard names. If this vocabulary is used, the value of the Keyword
element must be the same as the CF "Standard name" for the
corresponding property.

It's worth pointing out that the client software should make no assumptions on the data format of the
visualised data set based on the used property identifying vocabulary: The GRIB code table name for
air temperature "001" may be used for identifying an air temperature layer even if the visualised data
had never been encoded in a GRIB file.

A detailed example of a INSPIRE AC-MF compliant WMS 1.3 Capabilities document with the INSPIRE
service level metadata references is provided as Annex F.

IR Requirement
Article 14
Portrayal

(…)

3. For spatial object types whose objects can be further classified using a code list-valued attribute,
several layers may be defined. Each of these layers shall include the spatial objects
corresponding to one specific code list value. In the definition of such sets of layers in Annexes
II-IV,
(a) the placeholder <CodeListValue> shall represent the values of the relevant code list, with the
first letter in upper case,
(b) the placeholder <human-readable name> shall represent the human-readable name of the
code list values;
(c) the spatial object type shall include the relevant attribute and code list, in parentheses;
(d) one example of a layer shall be given.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 65
and Meteorological Geographical Features

11.1.1 Layers organisation


None.

11.2 Styles required to be supported by INSPIRE view services

An even more difficult task that defining layer names, is to define a standard visualisation styles for
atmospheric coverage data. Well-know and widely used, even legally mandating meteorological data
visualisation styles have been defined the WMO and ICAO, but these are designed for specific usage
contexts (weather forecasters and aviation), and may not be suitable for non-expert or cross-theme
usage contexts.

Most meteorological properties are portrayed differently according to the intended usage: For example
a ground temperature coverage could be visualised as a colour map, an isoline contour plot, or as
numerical values at certain points on a map. Which visualisation is the most suitable not only depends
on a use case, but also from the selected visualisation styles other layers at display.

For the reasons stated above, this document does not specify any requirements or recommendations
for styling of the meteorological coverage data as INSPIRE View Service layers. It is however
recommended that existing de facto or de jure standards for coverage and feature meteorological data
visualisation be used when the anticipated user community is expecting them: If the service is mainly
intended for meteorological expert users, then the visualisations should follow the WMO
meteorological data visualisation standards as closely as possible. The compliancy with existing
visualisation standards should be indicated in the layer or service metadata.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 66
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Bibliography
[DS-D2.3] INSPIRE DS-D2.3, Definition of Annex Themes and Scope, v3.0,
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reports/ImplementingRules/DataSpecifications/D2.3_Definiti
on_of_Annex_Themes_and_scope_v3.0.pdf

[DS-D2.5] INSPIRE DS-D2.5, Generic Conceptual Model, v3.3,


http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/D2.5_v3_3.pdf

[DS-D2.6] INSPIRE DS-D2.6, Methodology for the development of data specifications, v3.0,
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reports/ImplementingRules/DataSpecifications/D2.6_v3.0.p
df

[DS-D2.7] INSPIRE DS-D2.7, Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data, v3.2,
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/D2.7_v3.2.pdf

[D2.8.I.1 ] D2.8.I.1 INSPIRE Specification on Coordinate Reference Systems – Guidelines version 3.1

[ISO 19101] EN ISO 19101:2005 Geographic information – Reference model (ISO 19101:2002)

[ISO 19103] ISO/TS 19103:2005, Geographic information – Conceptual schema language

[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic information – Spatial schema (ISO 19107:2003)

[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005 Geographic information - Temporal schema (ISO 19108:2002)

[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO
19111:2007)

[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)

[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)

[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO
19135:2005)

[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation

[ISO 19157] ISO/DIS 19157, Geographic information – Data quality

[ISO 19158] ISO/DTS 19158 Geographic information – Quality assurance of data supply

[OGC 06-103r3] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access –
Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.0

[WMO ET-SAT-6] EXPERT TEAM ON SATELLITE SYSTEMS SIXTH SESSION, ET-SAT-6/Doc. 16


(1)(25.III. 2011), World Meteorological Organisation.

WMO Core Metadata Profile 1.2 Guidelines on the use of Metadata for WIS 0.1, Nov2010 v0.1
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 67
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex A
(normative)

Abstract Test Suite

Disclaimer
While this Annex refers to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010
implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
interoperability of spatial data sets and services, it does not replace the legal act or any part of it.

The objective of the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) included in this Annex is to help the conformance
testing process. It includes a set of tests to be applied on a data set to evaluate whether it fulfils the
requirements included in this data specification and the corresponding parts of Commission
Regulation No 1089/2010 (implementing rule as regards interoperability of spatial datasets and
services, further referred to as ISDSS Regulation). This is to help data providers in declaring the
conformity of a data set to the ―degree of conformity, with implementing rules adopted under Article
7(1) of Directive 2007/2/EC‖, which is required to be provided in the data set metadata according to
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2008/1205 (the Metadata Regulation).

Part 1 of this ATS includes tests that provide input for assessing conformity with the ISDSS
regulation. In order to make visible which requirements are addressed by a specific test, references
to the corresponding articles of the legal act are given. The way how the cited requirements apply to
ac-mf specification is described under the testing method.

In addition to the requirements included in ISDSS Regulation this Technical guideline contains TG
requirements too. TG requirements are technical provisions that need to be fulfilled in order to be
conformant with the corresponding IR requirement when the specific technical implementation
proposed in this document is used. Such requirements relate for example to the default encoding
described in section 9. Part 2 of the ATS presents tests necessary for assessing the conformity with
TG requirements.

NOTE Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in this ATS implies
conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).

The ATS is applicable to the data sets that have been transformed to be made available through
INSPIRE download services (i.e. the data returned as a response to the mandatory ―Get Spatial
Dataset‖ operation) rather than the original ―source‖ data sets.

The requirements to be tested are grouped in several conformance classes. Each of these classes
covers a specific aspect: one conformance class contains tests reflecting the requirements on the
application schema, another on the reference systems, etc. Each conformance class is identified
by a URI (uniform resource identifier) according to the following pattern:

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/<conformance class identifier>

EXAMPLE 1 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ef/rs identifies the Reference


Systems ISDSS conformance class of the Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF) data theme.

The results of the tests should be published referring to the relevant conformance class (using its
URI).

When an INSPIRE data specification contains more than one application schema, the requirements
tested in a conformance class may differ depending on the application schema used as a target for the
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 68
and Meteorological Geographical Features

transformation of the data set. This will always be the case for the application schema conformance
class. However, also other conformance classes could have different requirements for different
application schemas. In such cases, a separate conformance class is defined for each application
schema, and they are distinguished by specific URIs according to the following pattern:

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/<conformance class identifier>/


<application schema namespace prefix>

EXAMPLE 2 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/el/as/el-vec identifies the


conformity with the application schema (as) conformance class for the Elevation Vector Elements (el-
vec) application schema.

An overview of the conformance classes and the associated tests is given in the table below.

Table 6. Overview of the tests within this Abstract Test Suite.

Annex A (normative) Abstract Test Suite ............................................................................................. 67


A.1 Application Schema Conformance Class ............................................................................... 70
A.1.1 Schema element denomination test ................................................................................ 70
A.1.2 Value type test ................................................................................................................. 70
A.1.3 Value test ......................................................................................................................... 70
A.1.4 Attributes/associations completeness test ....................................................................... 71
A.1.5 Abstract spatial object test ............................................................................................... 71
A.1.6 Constraints test ................................................................................................................ 71
A.1.7 Geometry representation test .......................................................................................... 72
A.2 Reference Systems Conformance Class ................................................................................ 72
A.2.1 Datum test........................................................................................................................ 72
A.2.2 Coordinate reference system test .................................................................................... 72
A.2.3 Grid test ........................................................................................................................... 73
A.2.4 View service coordinate reference system test ............................................................... 73
A.2.5 Temporal reference system test ...................................................................................... 74
A.2.6 Units of measurements test ............................................................................................. 74
A.3 Data Consistency Conformance Class ................................................................................... 74
A.3.1 Unique identifier persistency test ..................................................................................... 74
A.3.2 Version consistency test .................................................................................................. 75
A.3.3 Life cycle time sequence test........................................................................................... 75
A.3.4 Validity time sequence test .............................................................................................. 75
A.3.5 Update frequency test ...................................................................................................... 76
A.3.6 Observed property identifier test...................................................................................... 76
A.4 Metadata IR Conformance Class ............................................................................................ 76
A.4.1 Metadata for interoperability test ..................................................................................... 76
A.5 Information Accessibility Conformance Class ......................................................................... 76
A.5.1 Code list publication test .................................................................................................. 77
A.5.2 CRS publication test ........................................................................................................ 77
A.5.3 CRS identification test ..................................................................................................... 77
A.5.4 Grid identification test ...................................................................................................... 77
A.6 Data Delivery Conformance Class .......................................................................................... 78
A.6.1 Encoding compliance test ................................................................................................ 78
A.6.2 Specialised Observations types test ................................................................................ 78
A.7 Technical Guideline Conformance Class ................................................................................ 79
A.7.1 Multiplicity test.................................................................................................................. 79
A.7.2 CRS http URI test ............................................................................................................ 79
A.7.3 Metadata encoding schema validation test ..................................................................... 79
A.7.4 Metadata occurrence test ................................................................................................ 79
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 69
and Meteorological Geographical Features

A.7.5 Metadata consistency test ............................................................................................... 80


A.7.6 Encoding schema validation test ..................................................................................... 80
A.7.7 Coverage multipart representation test ........................................................................... 80
A.7.8 Coverage domain consistency test .................................................................................. 80
A.7.9 JPEG 2000 conformity test .............................................................................................. 81
A.7.10 Style test ....................................................................................................................... 81

In order to be conformant to a conformance class, a data set has to pass all tests defined for that
conformance class.

In order to be conformant with the ISDSS regulation the inspected data set needs to be conformant to
all conformance classes in Part 1. The conformance class for overall conformity with the ISDSS
regulation is identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/.

In order to be conformant with the Technical Guidelines, the dataset under inspection needs to be
conformant to all conformance classes included both in Part 1 and 2. Chapter 8 describes in detail
how to publish the result of testing regarding overall conformity and conformity with the conformance
classes as metadata. The conformance class for overall conformity with the Technical Guidelines is
identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/tg/ac-mf/3.0.

It should be noted that data providers are not obliged to integrate / decompose the original structure of
the source data sets when they deliver them for INSPIRE. It means that a conformant dataset can
contain less or more spatial object / data types than specified in the ISDSS Regulation.

A dataset that contains less spatial object and/or data types can be regarded conformant when
the corresponding types of the source datasets after the necessary transformations fulfil the
requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation.

A dataset that contain more spatial object and/or data types may be regarded as conformant
when
- all the spatial object / data types that have corresponding types in the source dataset after the
necessary transformations fulfil the requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation and
- all additional elements of the source model (spatial object types, data types, attributes,
constraints, code lists and enumerations together with their values) do not conflict with any rule
defined in the interoperability target specifications defined for any theme within INSPIRE.

Open issue 1: Even though the last condition can be derived from Art. 8(4) of the Directive, the
ISDSS Regulation does not contain requirements concerning the above issue. Therefore, no specific
tests have been included in this abstract suite for testing conformity of extended application schemas.
Annex F of the Generic Conceptual Model (D2.5) provides an example how to extend INSPIRE
application schemas in a compliant way.

The ATS contains a detailed list of abstract tests. It should be noted that some tests in the Application
schema conformance class can be automated by utilising xml schema validation tools. It should be
noted that failing such validation test does not necessary reflect non-compliance to the application
schema; it may be the results of erroneous encoding.

Each test in this suite follows the same structure:


 Requirement: citation from the legal texts (ISDSS requirements) or the Technical Guidelines
(TG requirements);
 Purpose: definition of the scope of the test;
 Reference: link to any material that may be useful during the test;
 Test method: description of the testing procedure.

According to ISO 19105:2000 all tests in this ATS are basic tests. Therefore, this statement is not
repeated each time.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 70
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Part 1
(normative)

Conformity with Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

A.1 Application Schema Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/as/ac-mf

A.1.1 Schema element denomination test


a) Purpose: Verification whether each element of the dataset under inspection carries a name
specified in the target application schema(s).

b) Reference: Art. 3 and Art.4 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Examine whether the corresponding elements of the source schema (spatial object
types, data types, attributes, association roles, code lists, and enumerations) are mapped to the target
schema with the correct designation of mnemonic names.

NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application
schema(s) in section 5.2.

A.1.2 Value type test


a) Purpose: Verification whether all attributes or association roles use the corresponding value types
specified in the application schema(s).

b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4, Art.6(1), Art.6(4), Art.6(5) and Art.9(1)of Commission Regulation No
1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Examine whether the value type of each provided attribute or association role adheres
to the corresponding value type specified in the target specification.

NOTE 1 This test comprises testing the value types of INSPIRE identifiers, the value types of
attributes and association roles that should be taken from enumeration and code lists, and the
coverage domains.

NOTE 2 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application
schema(s) in section 5.2.

A.1.3 Value test


a) Purpose: Verify whether all attributes or association roles whose value type is a code list or
enumeration take the values set out therein.

b) Reference: Art.4 (3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: When an attribute / association role has an enumeration or code list as its type,
compare the values of each instance with those provided in the application schema. To pass this tests
any instance of an attribute / association role
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 71
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 shall not take any other value than defined in the enumeration table when its type is an
enumeration.
 shall take only values explicitly specified in the code list when the code list‘s extensibility is
―none‖.
 shall take only a value explicitly specified in the code list or shall take a value that is narrower
(i.e. more specific) than those explicitly specified in the application schema when the code list‘s
extensibility is ―narrower‖.

NOTE 1 This test is not applicable to code lists with extensibility ―open‖ or ―any‖.

NOTE 2 When a data provider only uses code lists with narrower (more specific values) this test can
be fully performed based on internal information.

A.1.4 Attributes/associations completeness test


a) Purpose: Verification whether each instance of spatial object type and data types include all
attributes and association roles as defined in the target application schema.

b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), Art.4(2), and Art.5(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Examine whether all attributes and association roles defined for a spatial object type
or data type are present for each instance in the dataset.

NOTE 1 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application
schema(s) in section 5.2.

NOTE 2 For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided if it exists in or
applies to the real world entity – either the corresponding value (if available in the data set maintained
by the data provider) or the value of void. If the characteristic described by the attribute or association
role does not exist in or apply to the real world entity, the attribute or association role does not need to
be present in the data set.

A.1.5 Abstract spatial object test

a) Purpose: Verification whether the dataset does NOT contain abstract spatial object / data types
defined in the target application schema(s).

b) Reference: Art.5(3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Examine that there are NO instances of abstract spatial object / data types in the
dataset provided.

NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application
schema(s) in section 5.2.

A.1.6 Constraints test


a) Purpose: Verification whether the instances of spatial object and/or data types provided in the
dataset adhere to the constraints specified in the target application schema(s).

b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), and Art.4(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 72
and Meteorological Geographical Features

c) Test Method: Examine all instances of data for the constraints specified for the corresponding
spatial object / data type. Each instance shall adhere to all constraints specified in the target
application schema(s).

NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application
schema(s) in section 5.2.

A.1.7 Geometry representation test

a) Purpose: Verification whether the value domain of spatial properties is restricted as specified in the
Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.

b) Reference: Art.12(1) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Check whether all spatial properties only use 0, 1 and 2-dimensional geometric
objects that exist in the right 2-, 3- or 4-dimensional coordinate space, and where all curve
interpolations respect the rules specified in the reference documents.

NOTE Further technical information is in OGC Simple Feature spatial schema v1.2.1 [06-103r4].

A.2 Reference Systems Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/rs

A.2.1 Datum test


a) Purpose: Verify whether each instance of a spatial object type is given with reference to one of the
(geodetic) datums specified in the target specification.

c) Reference: Annex II Section 1.2 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

b) Test Method: Check whether each instance of a spatial object type specified in the application
schema(s) in section 5 has been expressed using:
 the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) within its geographical scope; or
 the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) for areas beyond the ETRS89
geographical scope; or
 other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with the ITRS. Compliant with the
ITRS means that the system definition is based on the definition of ITRS and there is a well-
established and described relationship between both systems, according to the EN ISO
19111.

NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.

A.2.2 Coordinate reference system test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the two- and three-dimensional coordinate reference systems are used as
defined in section 6.

b) Reference: Section 6 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Inspect whether the horizontal and vertical components of coordinates one of the
corresponding coordinate reference system has been:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 73
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 Three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the
parameters of the Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80) ellipsoid.
 Three-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height) based on a
datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
 Two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude) based on a datum specified in
1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
 Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area coordinate reference
system.
 Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Conformal Conic coordinate reference system.
 Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Transverse Mercator coordinate reference system.
 For the vertical component on land, the European Vertical Reference System (EVRS) shall be
used to express gravity-related heights within its geographical scope. Other vertical reference
systems related to the Earth gravity field shall be used to express gravity-related heights in
areas that are outside the geographical scope of EVRS.
 For the vertical component in marine areas where there is an appreciable tidal range (tidal
waters), the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) shall be used as the reference surface.
 For the vertical component in marine areas without an appreciable tidal range, in open oceans
and effectively in waters that are deeper than 200 meters, the Mean Sea Level (MSL) or a well-
defined reference level close to the MSL shall be used as the reference surface.―
 For the vertical component in the free atmosphere, barometric pressure, converted to height
using ISO 2533:1975 International Standard Atmosphere, or other linear or parametric
reference systems shall be used. Where other parametric reference systems are used, these
shall be described in an accessible reference using EN ISO 19111-2:2012.
 WGS 84 Geodetic CRS (geographic 2D)
 EGM96 Vertical CRS

NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.

A.2.3 Grid test


a) Purpose: Verify that gridded data related are available using the grid compatible with one of the
coordinate reference systems defined in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010

b) Reference: Annex II Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Check whether the dataset defined as a grid is compatible with one of the coordinate
reference.
 Grid_ETRS89_GRS80 based on two-dimensional geodetic coordinates using the parameters of
the GRS80 ellipsoid
 Grid_ETRS89_GRS80zn based on two-dimensional geodetic coordinates with zoning,
 Plane coordinates using the Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area projection and the parameters of the
GRS80 ellipsoid (ETRS89-LAEA)
 Plane coordinates using the Lambert Conformal Conic projection and the parameters of the
GRS80 ellipsoid (ETRS89-LCC)
 Plane coordinates using the Transverse Mercator projection and the parameters of the GRS80
ellipsoid (ETRS89-TMzn)

NOTE 1 By way of derogation from the requirements of Section 2.2 of Annex II, gridded data related
to the themes Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features may be made
available using any appropriate grid.
NOTE 2 Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.

A.2.4 View service coordinate reference system test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the spatial data set is available in the two dimensional geodetic coordinate
system for their display with the INSPIRE View Service.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 74
and Meteorological Geographical Features

b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.4 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Check that each instance of a spatial object types specified in the application
schema(s) in section 5 is available in the two-dimensional geodetic coordinate system

NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.

A.2.5 Temporal reference system test

a) Purpose: Verify whether date and time values are given as specified in Commission Regulation No
1089/2010.

b) Reference: Art.11(1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Check whether:


 the Gregorian calendar is used as a reference system for date values;
 the Universal Time Coordinated (UTC) or the local time including the time zone as an offset
from UTC are used as a reference system for time values.

NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.

A.2.6 Units of measurements test


a) Purpose: Verify whether all measurements are expressed as specified in Commission Regulation
No 1089/2010.

b) Reference: Art.12(2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Check whether all measurements are expressed in SI units or non-SI units accepted
for use with the International System of Units.

NOTE 1 Further technical information is given in ISO 80000-1:2009.

NOTE 2 Degrees, minutes and seconds are non-SI units accepted for use with the International
System of Units for expressing measurements of angles.

A.3 Data Consistency Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/dc

A.3.1 Unique identifier persistency test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifier
remain the same for different versions of a spatial object.

b) Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Compare the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifiers in the
previous version(s) of the dataset with the namespace and localId attributes of the external object
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 75
and Meteorological Geographical Features

identifiers of current version for the same instances of spatial object / data types; To pass the test,
neither the namespace, nor the localId shall be changed during the life-cycle of a spatial object.

NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the
database of the data providers.

NOTE 2 When using URI this test includes the verification whether no part of the construct has been
changed during the life cycle of the instances of spatial object / data types.

NOTE 3 Further technical information is given in section 14.2 of the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual
Model.

A.3.2 Version consistency test


a) Purpose: Verify whether different versions of the same spatial object / data type instance belong to
the same type.

b) Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Compare the types of different versions for each instance of spatial object / data type

NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the
database of the data providers.

A.3.3 Life cycle time sequence test


a) Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion refers to an earlier
moment of time than the value of the attribute endLifespanVersion for every spatial object / object type
where this property is specified.

b) Reference: Art.10(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion with attribute
endLifespanVersion. The test is passed when the beginLifespanVersion value is before
endLifespanVersion value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for which this attribute has
been defined.

NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the
database of the data providers.

A.3.4 Validity time sequence test


a) Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute validFrom refers to an earlier moment of
time than the value of the attribute validTo for every spatial object / object type where this property is
specified.

b) Reference: Art.12(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute validFrom with attribute validTo. The test is passed
when the validFrom value is before validTo value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for
which this attribute has been defined.

NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the
database of the data providers.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 76
and Meteorological Geographical Features

A.3.5 Update frequency test


a) Purpose: Verify whether all the updates in the source dataset(s) have been transmitted to the
dataset(s) which can be retrieved for the AC-MF data theme using INSPIRE download services.

b) Reference: Art.8 (2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Compare the values of beginning of life cycle information in the source and the target
datasets for each instance of corresponding spatial object / object types. The test is passed when the
difference between the corresponding values is less than 6 months.

NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the
database of the data providers.

A.3.6 Observed property identifier test

a) Purpose: Verification whether the observed property of an OM_Observation is identified by an


designated identifier.

b) Reference: Annex IV, Section 13.3

c) Test Method: Check whether the observed property of an OM_Observation is identified by an


identifier from the EU Air Quality Reference Component, the WMO GRIB Code & Flags Table 4.2, the
Climate and Forecast Standard Names vocabularies or another appropriate vocabulary..

NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 5.3 of this document.

A.4 Metadata IR Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/md

A.4.1 Metadata for interoperability test

a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata for interoperability of spatial data sets and services described
in 1089/2010 Commission Regulation have been created and published for each dataset related to the
AC-MF data theme.

b) Reference: Art.13 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010

c) Test Method: Inspect whether metadata describing the coordinate reference systems, encoding,
and spatial representation type have been created and published. If the spatial data set contains
temporal information that does not refer to the default temporal reference system, inspect whether
metadata describing the temporal reference system have been created and published. If an encoding
is used that is not based on UTF-8, inspect whether metadata describing the character encoding have
been created.

NOTE Further technical information is given in section 8 of this document.

A.5 Information Accessibility Conformance Class


Conformance class:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 77
and Meteorological Geographical Features

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/ia

A.5.1 Code list publication test

a) Purpose: Verify whether all additional values used in the data sets for attributes, for which narrower
values or any other value than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 are allowed, are
published in a register.

b) Reference: Art.6(3) and Annex IV Section 13.2.1

c) Test method: For each additional value used in the data sets for code list-valued attributes, check
whether it is published in a register.

NOTE Further technical information is given in section 5 of this document.

A.5.2 CRS publication test

a) Purpose: Verify whether the identifiers and the parameters of coordinate reference system are
published in common registers.

b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.5

c) Test method: Check whether the identifier and the parameter of the CRS used for the dataset are
included in a register. .

NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.

A.5.3 CRS identification test

a) Purpose: Verify whether identifiers for other coordinate reference systems than specified in
Commission Regulation 1089/2010 have been created and their parameters have been described
according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127.

b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.3.4

c) Test method: Check whether the register with the identifiers of the coordinate reference systems is
accessible.

NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.

A.5.4 Grid identification test

a) Purpose: Verify whether identifiers for other geographic grid systems than specified in Commission
Regulation 1089/2010 have been created and their definitions have been either described with the
data or referenced.

b) Reference: Annex II Section 2.1 and 2.2

c) Test Method: Check whether the identifiers for grids have been created. Inspect the dataset and/or
the metadata for inclusion of grid definition.

NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 78
and Meteorological Geographical Features

A.6 Data Delivery Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ac-mf/de

A.6.1 Encoding compliance test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the encoding used to deliver the dataset comply with EN ISO 19118.

b) Reference: Art.7 (1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.

c) Test Method: Follow the steps of the Abstract Test Suit provided in EN ISO 19118.

NOTE 1 Datasets using the default encoding specified in Section 9 fulfil this requirement.

NOTE 2 Further technical information is given in Section 9 of this document.

A.6.2 Specialised Observations types test

a) Purpose: Verify whether the data related to the themes Atmospheric Conditions or Meteorological
Geographical Features are made available using the appropriate types.

b) Reference: Annex IV, Section 13.3

c) Test Method: Verify whether the data related to the themes Atmospheric Conditions or
Meteorological Geographical Features are made available using the types defined in Specialised
Observations package in Annex I, the OM_Observation spatial object type or sub-types thereof.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 79
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Part 2
(informative)

Conformity with the technical guideline (TG) Requirements

A.7 Technical Guideline Conformance Class


Conformance class:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/tg/ac-mf/3.0

A.7.1 Multiplicity test


a) Purpose: Verify whether each instance of an attribute or association role specified in the application
schema(s) does not include fewer or more occurrences than specified in section 5.

c) Reference: Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5 of this
guideline.

b) Test Method: Examine that the number of occurrences of each attribute and/or association role for
each instance of a spatial object type or data type provided in the dataset corresponds to the number
of occurrences of the attribute / association role that is specified in the application schema(s) in
section 5.

A.7.2 CRS http URI test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the coordinate reference system used to deliver data for INSPIRE network
services has been identified by URIs according to the EPSG register.

c) Reference: Table 2 in Section 6 of this technical guideline

b) Test Method: Compare the URI of the dataset with the URIs in the table.

NOTE 1 Passing this test implies the fulfilment of test A6.2

NOTE 2 Further reference please see http://www.epsg.org/geodetic.html

A.7.3 Metadata encoding schema validation test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata follows an XML schema specified in ISO/TS 19139.

c) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139

b) Test Method: Inspect whether provided XML schema is conformant to the encoding specified in ISO
19139 for each metadata instance.

NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML
schemas that are currently available.

A.7.4 Metadata occurrence test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the occurrence of each metadata element corresponds to those specified
in section 8.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 80
and Meteorological Geographical Features

c) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline

b) Test Method: Examine the number of occurrences for each metadata element. The number of
occurrences shall be compared with its occurrence specified in Section 8:

NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML
schema

A.7.5 Metadata consistency test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata elements follow the path specified in ISO/TS 19139.

c) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139

b) Test Method: Compare the XML schema of each metadata element with the path provide in ISO/TS
19137.

NOTE 1 This test does not apply to the metadata elements that are not included in ISO/TS 19139.

A.7.6 Encoding schema validation test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the provided dataset follows the rules of default encoding specified in
section 9 of this document

c) Reference: section 9 of this technical guideline

b) Test Method: Inspect whether provided encoding(s) is conformant to the encoding(s) for the
relevant application schema(s) as defined in section 9:

NOTE 1 Applying this test to the default encoding schema described in section 9 facilitates testing
conformity with the application schema specified in section 5. In such cases running this test with
positive result may replace tests from A1.1 to A1.4 provided in this abstract test suite.

NOTE 2 Using Schematron or other schema validation tool may significantly improve the validation
process, because some some complex constraints of the schema cannot be validated using the
simple XSD validation process. On the contrary to XSDs Schematron rules are not delivered together
with the INSPIRE data specifications. Automating the process of validation (e.g. creation of
Schematron rules) is therefore a task and an opportunity for data providers.

A.7.7 Coverage multipart representation test


a) Purpose: Verify whether coverage data encoded as multipart messages comply with the multipart
representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-
146r2].

b) Reference: OGC standard GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-146r2].

c) Test Method: Inspect whether coverage data encoded as multipart messages comply with the
multipart representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC
09-146r2].

NOTE further information is provided in section 9.4 of this technical guideline.

A.7.8 Coverage domain consistency test


a) Purpose: Verify whether the encoded coverage domain is consistent with the information provided
in the GML application schema.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 81
and Meteorological Geographical Features

b) Reference: Section 9.4 of this technical guideline.

c) Test Method: For multipart coverage messages compare the encoded coverage domain with the
description of the coverage component in the GML application schema

NOTE 1 This test applies only to those multipart messages, where the coverage range is encoded
together with the coverage domain (some binary formats).

NOTE 2 .This test does not apply to multipart messages where the coverage range is embedded
without describing the data structure (e.g. text based formats).

A.7.9 JPEG 2000 conformity test


a) Purpose: Verify whether coverage data encoded in standalone JPEG 2000 files comply with the the
profile 1 of ISO 15444-1 in general case or OGC 05-047r3 standard when imagery is delivered as
GMLJP2 files and that it received the image/jp2 MIME tupe registered in RFC 3745.

b) Reference: TG Requirement 8

c) Test Method: Inspect whether coverage range encoded in standalone JPEG 2000 files comply the
standards stated in a).

NOTE Test A.7.9 does not replace test A.7.8. The Coverage multipart representation test applies to
JPEG 2000 encoding too.

A.7.10 Style test

a) Purpose: Verify whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each
specified layer.

b) Reference: section 11.2.

c) Test Method: Check whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each
specified layer.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 82
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex B
(informative)
Use cases

This annex describes the use cases that were used as a basis for the development of this data
specification.

In order to identify priority areas for the specification of meteorological data, the TWG selected the
following three high level use cases:

1. Use of meteorology in support of environmental emergency response


2. Flood forecasting
3. Climate assessment (with past or predicted data).

These cases have been selected after reviewing a list of Use cases considered for conceptual
modelling by the OGC Met Ocean Domain Working Group. It was felt that they were all highly relevant
to environmental protection, and that they would all require significant and possibly challenging cross
boundary as well as cross-theme cooperation. Detailed use cases have been developed under these
three categories:

- Under 1:

o Plume prediction in support of emergency response

The weather can have a major influence on the release of a pollutant into the atmosphere, from
incidents such as large fires, chemical releases, biological incidents, nuclear releases and volcanic
eruptions. The latest observations and sophisticated computer predictions can be used to provide
plume predictions, ranging immediately after release (to allow safe approach to an incident) through to
longer-range predictions of areas at risk, as well as information on local weather conditions. These
services support the activities of emergency services and other government departments, as well as to
the international community.

- Under 2:

o Flash flood management

Intense and localized rain events are commonly observed in the Mediterranean area. Because of the
short response time of the basins, these events lead to flash flood, likely to cause serious damages,
especially over urban areas. That is why the need for systems able to help authorities in related crisis
management is increasing. The meteorological data inputs for such systems are mainly rainfall
observations and nowcasting, from radars, ground based sensors; input data from very high resolution
non hydrostatic models is also becoming available.

o Short and medium range flood forecasting

Severe (transnational) fluvial floods frequently occur and have large impact on societies. To reduce
the impacts of floods early warning systems have been setup simulating hydrological processes in
river basins and providing flood information for stakeholders. Different meteorological datasets are
input for the models: weather observations, deterministic forecasts and ensemble forecasts.

- Under 3:

o Finding the most interesting locations for new wind farms


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 83
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Wind power companies planning on building wind turbines need several estimated wind parameters
like wind speed distribution, vertical wind profile, turbulence intensity, gustiness and maximum wind
speed. for drafting early plans for the best places as well as the most suitable properties of the wind
farms The parameters should be visualised in a way appropriate for quickly finding the most promising
areas for production in the time frame 2015-2020.

o Climate impacts

Organisations are becoming more aware of their sensitivity to weather, and to climate change,
particularly those concerned with water, agriculture, food production, ecosystems, biodiversity, utilities,
transport, energy, health, economics, natural disasters and security. Past climate data (climatological
observation records, gridded climatologies, and re-analyses) can be used to calculate the existing
risks due to current weather and climate, before climate projections for various horizons are used to
assess the likely change in the future. The main parameters of interest are temperature and
precipitation, with ensembles helping to provide estimates of uncertainty.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 84
and Meteorological Geographical Features

B.1 Use Case 1 - Plume Prediction in Support of Emergency


Response
Description

The weather can be the cause of an emergency and/or have a major influence on its impact. Thus,
meteorological organisations (such as national meteorological services) can play a key role in
providing expert advice on the interpretation and impact of the weather during an emergency, as well
as assisting in the development and maintenance of risk registers, providing input into exercise and
planning processes and attending incident command and control centres. Specialist forecasters can
provide specialist meteorological information to deal with a variety of environmental incidents to the
emergency services and other government departments, as well as to the international community and
citizens.

Meteorological organisations can provide plume predictions during emergencies, with specialist
forecasters interpreting data from the latest observations as well as from sophisticated computer
models to deduce the local weather conditions and the areas at risk from the pollutant. Local variations
in wind speed and direction are the main influencers on dispersion. Rain at the scene or downwind
can also wash the pollutant out of the atmosphere leading to higher concentrations on the ground. The
vertical temperature profile of the atmosphere also affects the stability of the air and this determines
how high the plume is likely to rise, which subsequently affects the distance it might travel and its
behaviour close to hills. This service covers a range of incident types which can result in the release of
a potentially hazardous plume:

 Fire (e.g. fire at a chemical plant or oil refinery);


 Chemical Release (e.g. chemical spillage or a road traffic accident in which a hazardous
substance has either escaped or ignited);
 Biological Incidents (e.g. foot & mouth, blue tongue)
 Nuclear Release (e.g. accident at nuclear power plant);
 Volcanic Eruption (i.e. prediction of ash plume).

Numerical atmospheric dispersion modelling environments can utilise a Lagrangian approach to


determine the location of a plume: pollutants are represented by a large number of model ‗particles‘
which are released into the modelled atmosphere at the source location. These particles are affected
by the local wind speed, atmospheric turbulence, precipitation, and other processes. Each model
‗particle‘ can have its own characteristics, represent different compounds, chemicals and real
particulate sizes, and can be affected by temporal and spatial variations in the meteorology including
turbulence and loss processes such as precipitation. Such models are able to simulate highly complex
dispersion events, predicting the movement of a wide range of pollutants in the atmosphere.

Although these ‗model particles‘ can be shown output directly, either as plots showing each particle at
a given time (possibly with colouring used to show height) or as particle trajectories, they are usually
accumulated into three-dimensional cells on a regular grid, to give concentration (potentially at
different vertical levels and times). They may alternatively be shown in terms of standard deviation
from the mid-plume value at a given radius from the release site, a so-called ―Area at Risk Map‖
(usually with at least two threshold values); this is important for early predictions, where the details of
release concentrations can be limited, and a prediction of an actual concentration could be misleading.

On notification of an incident, the specialist forecasters will run an atmospheric dispersion model,
having input all information provided about the release, to predict the movement, deposition and
dispersal of large plumes of material for periods of time ranging from hours to several days. The model
produces a geographical display of the movement of the plume showing the area at risk. The response
time for providing such information can vary from tens of minutes for small scale events to hours for a
predictions running out to a week or more. The models can be re-run as more detail becomes
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 85
and Meteorological Geographical Features

available following an accident, providing more precise concentration and deposition values. However,
in most incidents it is at least hours into an event before the composition of chemicals or substances
involved is fully known.

Typically, the models are highly configurable, and for more involved situations or non-standard cases,
the atmospheric dispersion research scientist will become involved in the process of running the
model. Unlike NWP models, the output is not usually a ‗complete set‘, but only those parameters,
heights, times, etc that are of interest (and for efficiency, zero values are not output).

Typically, services provided range from an immediate prediction of the direction of the plume, to allow
safe approach to an incident (e.g. a large fire), through to short-range predictions of areas of risk (e.g.
from chemical release) and longer-range prediction of areas at risk (e.g. from volcanic ash) and the
identification of the likely origin of particular pollutant (e.g. for a nuclear incident).

High Level Use Case


The Use Case diagram below shows all the use cases and actors considered. Use cases are colour-
coded to indicate their focus, with blue writing used to show the ‗super use case‘ for plume prediction
and red writing used to show the four main more specific use cases, which are described in the
following section; all other use cases are not explicitly detailed, but may appear as a step within the
main use cases. Large actors are involved in the detailed use cases; small actors are included to
provide a wider context, but are not involved directly in the detailed use cases.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 86
and Meteorological Geographical Features
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 87
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Actors

 Emergency Responder – organisations heavily involved in managing incident; for example,


emergency services, local authorities, health service bodies, health and safety agencies,
transport and utility companies (although exactly which organisations will depend on the nature
of the incident)
 Monitoring Site – site measuring a particular pollutant
 Strategic Command – a general class of actor used to describe the range of groups which
may come together to carry out a strategic role in the management of an incident. This includes
a range of levels (depending of the severity of the event):
 Operation command at incident site (police or fire officer)
 Tactical command within site of incident (usually senior police office)
 Strategic command and control centre remote from incident (chief police constable)
 Central government crisis response committee
 Scientific and technical advisory groups established to coordinate multi-agency specialist
advice to central government
 Citizens
 Forecast advisors
 Meteorological Organisation Plume Prediction Expert – a general class of actor used to
describe the experts involved in providing plume prediction services:
 Automated Application – used to quickly provide automated guidance
 Specialist Forecaster – provide routine operational guidance
 Atmospheric Dispersion Scientist – provide operational input in more specialist
situations
 Weather Observations Database – source of real-time weather observations
 Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Capability – range of NWP models and post-
processing, which provides automated weather forecasts at a range of scales, including:
 NWP Post-Processing Systems – applications employing down-scaling and rapid
updates (nowcasts) to provide a high-resolution (kilometre-scale) weather forecasts
 Atmospheric Dispersion Model – Lagrangian model used to determine the location of a
plume
 Map Database – Database of map overlays at wide range of scales.

Detailed Structured Description of Plume Prediction Use Cases

The plume prediction use cases are presented in more detail using a standard template in the
following sections, with primary example (and other examples) indicated in brackets in the title.

Use Case 1.1: Identify Safe Approach to Incident


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 88
and Meteorological Geographical Features

uc Identify safe approach to incident

Emergency Response Plume Prediction Meteorology Mapping

Obtain incident Prov ide high-resolution


location w eather analyses &
forecasts

Emergency responders Numerical w eather


prediction
«include» post-processing system

Identify safe approach Obtain w eather for


to incident «include» location

Automated application

Use Case 1.1 Identify safe approach to incident


Priority High
Description Provide Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) responders with the latest weather
information to help them identify a safe approach when dealing with a major
incident. Provides immediate access to forecast conditions, before a more
detailed area at risk product is available. This is realised through the use of
an automated application, with a web interface, available to all FRS incident
command units, mobilising centres and the national coordination centre.
Pre-condition An incident releasing a plume has occurred.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Emergency Responders provide the Incident Location via webpage
Step 2 Automated Application automatically obtains Current Weather data by
interpolating from the High-Resolution Post-Processed Model
Analysis/Forecast provided by NWP Post-ProcessingCapability
Step 3 Automated Application automatically generates Hazard Sector
visualisation, with supporting text, and a presentational form of Current
Weather (table & graph) on the webpage
Step 4 Emergency Responders review the Hazard Sector and Current Weather
products on a Webpage
Post-condition Emergency Responders understand the safe approach directions to the
incident.
Data Source: Incident Location
Description Location of incident as:
 Place name or Postcode (e.g. EX1 3PB)
 Country map grid reference (e.g. GB Ordnance Survey: SX500534) or
grid coordinates (e.g. UK eastings, northings: 377400, 399500)
 Latitude & Longitude
Data Provider Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) responders
Geographic Scope Point (or Polygon as proxy for point)
Thematic Scope Addresses (AD), Coordinate Reference Systems (RS)
Scale, resolution Point or Polygon
Delivery Webpage entry
Documentation None
Data Source: Current Weather
Description Point interpolation from high-resolution post-processed model analysis /
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 89
and Meteorological Geographical Features

forecast provided as:


 Table (text) of Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation Type, Precipitation
rate, Hazard Sector, wind speed Wind direction;
 Graphs of Precipitation rate, Temperature and Humidity against time.
Example shown in figure (b)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution PointSeries (hourly data for 6-hour window centred on current hour)
Delivery Webpage
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pws/emergency_response.pdf (section
3.8 FireMet)
Supporting Data Source: High-Resolution Post-Processed Model Analysis/Forecast
Description High-resolution NWP model analyses and forecasts post-processed to
produce gridded data accounting for local topographic effects.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area around specific point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (km resolution; hourly, past times as analyses, forecasts out to 12
hours or more)
Delivery Standard output in a standard meteorological (e.g. netCDF or GRIB) or
bespoke format
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/areas/numerical-modelling/post-processing
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/science/creating/daysahead/nwp/um_config.html
Data Source: Hazard Sector
Description Point interpolation from high-resolution post-processed model analysis
provided as:
 Visualisation of ‗Hazard Sector‘, with wind speed and direction
 Table with text information on Hazard Sector and wind (in range of
formats)
Example shown in figure (b)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution Point; TimeInstant (current hour)
Delivery Webpage
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pws/emergency_response.pdf (section
3.8 FireMet)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 90
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Use Case 1.2: Identify area at risk from plume


uc Identify area at risk from plume

Emergency Response Plume Prediction Meteorology Mapping

Prov ide w eather


observ ations

Obtain incident Weather observ ations


details database

Obtain w eather for


location

Prov ide w eather


«include»
analyses & forecasts
«include»
Numerical Weather
Emergency responders Prediction (NWP)
capability
Identify area at risk
from plume

«include» Perform numerical


simulation of plume
ev olution

Atmospheric disperson
«include»
model

Specialist forecaster

Obtain map layer

Map database

Use Case 1.2 Identify areas at risk from plume


Priority High
Description Identify the areas at risk from the plume and the local weather conditions for
the next few hours in the form of a snapshot.
Pre-condition An incident releasing a plume has occurred.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Emergency Responders provides Incident Details by phone, which are
recorded.
Step 2 A Specialist Forecasters use the Incident Details to initialise the
Atmospheric Dispersion Model.
Step 3 Atmospheric Dispersion Model runs to generate a Forecast, using either:
 Model Analyses/Forecasts generated by the Numerical Weather
Prediction (NWP) Capability; or:
 Weather Observations provided by Weather Observations
Database.
Step 4 Atmospheric Dispersion Model generates an Area At Risk Map using a
Map Overlay obtained from the Map Database.
Step 5 EMARC generates Forecast of Relevant Meteorological Parameters,
using either the Model Analyses/Forecasts or Weather Observations.
Step 6 The Specialist Forecaster delivers Area At Risk Map and Forecast of
Relevant Meteorological Parameters to the Emergency Responders by
website, email or fax.
Post-condition Emergency responders have received and understood briefing material.
Data Source: Plume Incident Details
Description Details including:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 91
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 Location of incident as:


o Place name or Postcode (e.g. EX1 3PB);
o Country map grid reference (e.g. GB Ordnance Survey:
SX500534) or grid coordinates (e.g. UK eastings, northings:
377400, 399500); or:
o Latitude & Longitude
 Time of the event
 Any additional information on the chemicals involved
 Site characteristics (Urban, Rural, Coastal)
 Nature of Release (Continuous , Instantaneous, Fire at site)
 If available, details of the current weather at the site
Data Provider Emergency Services
Geographic Scope Point
Thematic Scope Addresses (AD), Coordinate Reference Systems (RS), Atmospheric
Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution Point; TimeInstant
Delivery Phone
Documentation See for example:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/publicsector/CHEMET/
Data Source: Atmospheric Dispersion Model Forecast
Description 4-dimensional (3d space & time) predictions of pollutant concentration. The
concentrations of the tracked parcels of air are mapped onto regular grid-
boxes. Note that only the required data are output, resulting, resulting in
limited sets of variables & levels, and ‗sparse‘ grids (values only held where
non-zero)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area around specific point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (spatial and temporal resolution depends on area of interest)
Delivery Standard output as netCDF, GRIB or text, suitable for visualisation in a GIS
environment.
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/environment/name.html
Data Source: Model Analysis/Forecast
Description A range of NWP models provide automated weather forecasts as 4-
dimensional (3d space & time) fields.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area around specific point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (km resolution; hourly, past times as analyses, forecasts out to 12
hours or more)
Delivery Standard output in a standard meteorological (e.g. netCDF or GRIB) or
bespoke format
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/science/creating/daysahead/nwp/um_config.html
Data Source: Weather Observations
Description Observations of the weather from a nearby observing site, in WMO BUFR
format.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Point, but representative of local area of interest
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution Point or PointSeries
Delivery n/a
Documentation None
Data Source: Map Overlay
Description High-resolution geographical map
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 92
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Data Provider Map provider


Geographic Scope Area of interest
Thematic Scope Cadastral Parcels (CP)
Scale, resolution Polygons provided as raster image (at, e.g. 1:50,000)
Delivery Website, email or fax (as part of Area at Risk Map product)
Documentation None
Data Source: Area At Risk Map
Description Product generated by Atmospheric Dispersion Model showing the
prediction of the plume extent, for two threshold values of standard deviation
from the concentration at the centre of the plume for a given radial distance
from the release site. This is visualised in combination with a Map Overlay.
Example shown in figure (c)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution Grid; TimePeriod (representing area of interest; typically <6 hour validity
period (but left to the forecaster‘s discretion), with updates as necessary
before existing forecast expires)
Delivery Website, email or fax
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/publicsector/CHEMET/
Data Source: Forecast of Relevant Meteorological Parameters
Description Product generated Model Analyses/Forecasts covers:
 Surface wind direction (8-point compass degrees true)
 Wind speed at 10 metres above ground level (kilometres per hour.)
 Indication of the behaviour of the plume due to weather conditions
while the chemical is assumed to have neutral buoyancy
 Total cloud cover (oktas), with height (in feet above ground level) of
the lowest significant cloud layer (5 oktas or more)
 Temperature
 Relative humidity.
 Intensity & type of precipitation
 Depth of the mixing layer
 Mean wind in the mixing layer
 Estimate of the vertical stability of the atmosphere using the Pasquill
Stability Index
Any changes during the period are given remarks sections.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Point, but representative of local area of interest
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution Point or Polygon; TimePeriod (representing area of interest; typically <6 hour
validity period (but left to the forecaster‘s discretion), with updates as
necessary before existing forecast expires)
Delivery Website, email or fax
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/publicsector/CHEMET/
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 93
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Use Case 1.3: Predict pollutant concentrations & deposition


uc Predict pollutant concentration & deposition

Emergency Response Plume Prediction Meteorology Mapping

Monitoring Site Obtain incident Prov ide w eather


details analyses & forecasts
Numerical Weather
Prediction (NWP)
capability

«include»
Emergency responders

Perform numerical
Predict pollutant simulation of plume
concentrations & «include» ev olution
deposition Atmospheric disperson
model

Citizens

«include»

Specialist forecaster

Obtain map layer


Meterological
Map database
organisation plume
prediction expert

Atmospheric dispersion
scientist

Use Case 1.3 Predict pollutant concentrations & deposition


Priority High
Description Provide predictions of the pollutant concentrations and deposition of the
pollutant from the plume incident out from a few hours to a week ahead in
the form of an animation (or series of snapshots). N.B. Only pollutant
concentration product is described below, but similar products can be
generated for deposition.
Pre-condition Either incident is already being monitored, or large-scale incident is detected
or notified (e.g. volcanic eruption).
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Monitoring Site (e.g. Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre) (or possibly
Emergency Responders) provide Incident Details.
Step 2 A Specialist Forecaster uses the Incident Details to initialise the
Atmospheric Dispersion Model (including specification of incident area,
plume height, chemical species or particle size distribution, etc).
Step 3 NAME runs to generate a NAME Forecast using from the Model
Analyses/Forecasts provided from the Numerical Weather Prediction
(NWP) Capability.
Step 4 The Atmospheric Dispersion Model generates Pollutant Concentrations
Forecast using a Map Overlay obtained from the Map Database
Step 5 The Specialist Forecaster delivers Pollutant Concentrations Forecast to
the Emergency Responders (and possibly the Citizens) by either WMO
GTS, website, email or fax.
Post-condition Emergency responders (and General Public) have received and
understood briefing material.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 94
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Flow of Events - Alternative Path 1


Replace Step 2 An Atmospheric Dispersion Scientist carries out more complex
configuration and initialisation of Atmospheric Dispersion Model using the
Incident Details.
Flow of Events - Alternative Path 2
Additional Step 4a The Specialist Forecaster draws simpler polygons around the Pollutant
Concentration Forecast to generate a variant of this product.
Data Source: Plume Incident Details
Description Details including:
 Location
 Time of the event
 As much information on the plume characteristics as possible
Data Provider Monitoring Site, Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (with initial identification by
eye witnesses or volcanic eruption detection system)
Geographic Scope Point, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Coordinate Reference Systems (RS)
Scale, resolution Point
Delivery Phone
Documentation http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/aviation/vaac/eruption_detection.html
Data Source: Atmospheric Dispersion Model Forecast
Description 4-dimensional (3d space & time) predictions of pollutant concentration. The
concentrations of the tracked parcels of air are mapped onto regular grid-
boxes. Note that only the required data are output, resulting, resulting in
limited sets of variables & levels, and ‗sparse‘ grids (values only held where
non-zero)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (spatial and temporal resolution depends on area of interest)
Delivery Standard output as netCDF, GRIB or text, suitable for visualisation in a GIS
environment.
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/environment/name.html
Data Source: Model Analysis/Forecast
Description A range of NWP models provide automated weather forecasts as 4-
dimensional (3d space & time) fields.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (representing area of interest which may extend outside the UK,
and time scales of interest out to 5 days or more)
Delivery Standard output in a standard meteorological (e.g. netCDF or GRIB) or
bespoke format
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/science/creating/daysahead/nwp/um_config.html
Data Source: Map
Description Geographical map at appropriate scale
Data Provider Map provider
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Cadastral Parcels (CP)?
Scale, resolution Polygons provided as raster image
Delivery Website, email or fax (as part of Pollutant Concentrations Forecast
product)
Documentation None
Data Source: Pollutant Concentrations Forecast
Description Generated product from NAME Forecast shows sequence of charts
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 95
and Meteorological Geographical Features

showing the predicted evolution of the plume extent at different heights and
different times for multiple thresholds. These are shown as raster, filled
contour or polygons (which also may be colour-filled); the polygons are also
produced as a text product. This is visualised in combination with an
appropriate Map Overlay.
Examples of the three forms shown in figure (a), (d) and (e) respectively.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries or PolygonSeries (representing area of interest which may extend
outside the UK, and time scales of interest out to 5 days or more)
Delivery (WMO) Global Telecommunications System (GTS), website, email or fax
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/aviation/vaac/forecasting.html

Use Case 1.4: Identify source of pollutant


uc Identify source of pollutant

Emergency Response Plume Prediction Meteorology Mapping

Monitoring Site
Prov ide w eather analyses &
forecasts
Obtain pollutant
Numerical Weather
observ ations
Prediction (NWP)
capability

Emergency responders «include»

Perform numerical
Identify source of simulation of plume
pollutant «include» ev olution

Atmospheric disperson
Specialist forecaster model

«include»
Meterological
organisation plume
prediction expert

Obtain map layer


Atmospheric dispersion
scientist Map database

Use Case 1.4 Identify Source of Pollutant


Priority High
Description Identify the likely area of origin in of a particular measured pollutant as area-
based probability
Pre-condition A particular pollutant has been detected at one or more monitoring sites.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Monitoring Site provides Pollutant Observations data.
Step 2 A Specialist Forecaster or the Atmospheric Dispersion Scientist uses
the Pollutant Observations to initialise the Atmospheric Dispersion
Model.
Step 3 The Atmospheric Dispersion Model runs ‗backwards‘ to generate a
Forecast using from the Model Analyses/Forecasts provided from the
Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Capability.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 96
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Step 4 The Atmospheric Dispersion Model generates Plume Origin Prediction


from forecast using a Map Overlay obtained from the Map Database.
Step 5 The Specialist Forecaster delivers Plume Origin Prediction to the
Emergency Responders by either website, email or fax
Post-condition Emergency responders have received and understood briefing material.
Data Source: Pollutant Observations
Description Measurement of a particular pollutant by a sensor at a particular site.
Detection of the pollutant at multiple sites would usually be required.
Data Provider Various monitoring organisations (depending on pollutant type)
Geographic Scope Point
Thematic Scope Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF)
Scale, resolution PointSeries (a number of points, with time period depending on what is
available)
Delivery Various
Documentation None
Data Source: Atmospheric Dispersion Model Forecast
Description 4-dimensional (3d space & time) predictions of pollutant concentration. The
concentrations of the tracked parcels of air are mapped onto regular grid-
boxes. Note that only the required data are output, resulting, resulting in
limited sets of variables & levels, and ‗sparse‘ grids (values only held where
non-zero).
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (spatial and temporal resolution depends on area of interest)
Delivery Standard output as netCDF, GRIB or text, suitable for visualisation in a GIS
environment.
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/environment/name.html
Data Source: Model Analysis/Forecast
Description A range of NWP models provide automated weather forecasts as 4-
dimensional (3d space & time) fields.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area around specific point
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (km resolution; hourly, past times as analyses, forecasts out to 12
hours or more)
Delivery Standard output in a standard meteorological (e.g. netCDF or GRIB) or
bespoke format
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/science/creating/daysahead/nwp/um_config.html
Data Source: Map
Description High-resolution geographical map
Data Provider Map provider
Geographic Scope Area of interest
Thematic Scope Cadastral Parcels (CP)
Scale, resolution Polygons provided as raster image (at, e.g. 1:50,000)
Delivery Website, email or fax (as part of Area at Risk Map product)
Documentation None
Data Source: Plume Origin Prediction
Description Generated product from the Atmospheric Dispersion Model Forecast,
shows the likelihood of a plume originating from within the area of the cell of
a raster map, as a probability (most cells will have a zero probability). This is
visualised in combination with an appropriate Map Overlay.
Example shown in figure (f)
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 97
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)


Scale, resolution Variable, depending on area of interest
Delivery Webpage, email or fax
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pws/emergency_response.pdf
(section 3.6 Source Identification)

B.2 Use Case 2.1 - Flash flood management


High level Use Case

Intense and localized rain events are commonly observed, especially in the Mediterranean area. When
occurring over short response time basins, these events lead to flash flood, likely to cause serious
damages, especially over urban areas. That is why the need for systems able to assist authorities in
related crisis management is critical.

The system can be broadly described in five steps:

1. Acquisition of input data for the numerical model


Rainfall data from rain gauges and radars (for instance polarized X-Band radars), short term
rainfall forecasts (―nowcasting‖), discharge data.

2. Calculate the flood extent and its short term evolution


Running a ―rainfall-runoff‖ model over the area of interest

3. Identify a flood risk scenario


On the basis of expected discharges, past flooding events and vulnerability.

4. Human assessment of the results


Real-time data, model output, risk map visualisation for human assessment of the risk of
flooding and risk scenarios.

5. Activation of the warning plan depending on the risk

Actors

 Emergency Responder
Organisations involved in managing the flood event (local authorities, civil protection
authorities)
 Citizens:
The target of flood warnings and safety plans when a flood risk has been identified and
assessed by the emergency responder.
 NMHS (National Meteorological & Hydrological Service)
NMHS provides :
o Radar production environment from radar network infrastructure and reflectivity
measurements, post processing etc. to consolidated rainfall estimations.
o Surface observation environment from sensor networks, in-situ acquisition systems, hubs
etc. to consolidated rainfall measures, including databases and archives (past data).
o Numerical simulation environment: data assimilation, high resolution non hydrostatic
model run on supercomputers, post-processing.
o Databases, data access services and / or dissemination systems
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 98
and Meteorological Geographical Features

High level UML Diagram

uc High lev el Use-Case

Emergency Response Hydrology Meteorology Portrayal , Mapping Other themes

Flash Flood Management System

Prov ide rainfall


short-term forecasts
Calculate flash flood
extent and short term
ev olution

Prov ide real-time


rainfall observ ations
Emergency Responder (radar and rain
gauges)
Assess the flood
impact

NMHS

Visusalization
Prov ide rainfall
climatology

Prov ide real-time


discharge
observ ation
Identifcation of the
flood risk

Flooding Alert
Prov ide v ulnerability
Citizen data

Hydrology is actually the core activity of this use-case, the meteorological sub-cases are intended to
provide weather data (mainly rainfall data and very short-range forecasts). So, the overall use-case
has been split in order to isolate sub-cases related to the INSPIRE themes ―Atmospheric Conditions‖
and ―Meteorological Geographical Features‖.

Detailed Structured Description of Flash flood management Use Cases

Use Case 2.1.1 - Calculate flash flood extent and its short term evolution
Use Case Description
Name Calculate flash flood extent and its short term evolution
Primary actor Rainfall – Runoff model
Goal Predict the flash-flood extent
System under
consideration Flash flood information system

Importance High
Hydrological models used to calculate flash-floods extents are usually rainfall-
Description runoff models. The meteorological data input for such models is mainly radar
rainfall data, calibrated with surface rain gauges measurements when available.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 99
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Use Case Description


Recently, high resolution non hydrostatic models are able to provide accurate
short-term rainfall forecasts. Finally, real-time rainfall data is compared against
rainfall and flow information climatology to identify a flood scenario.
- Operational network of surface rain gauges
- Operational network of radars (and post processing system to convert
measured reflectivities into spatial rainfall data)
Pre-condition - Operational nowcasting system to predict rainfall (fine mesh model or other
method )
- Rainfall and flow climatology in order to calibrate the Rainfall-Runoff model
- Operational Rainfall-Runoff model
Post-condition Flood extent and water velocity dataset
Flow of Events – Basic Path
Step 1. Collect rainfall data from surface gauges within the spatio-temporal domain of
interest
Step 2 Collect rainfall radar data within the spatio-temporal domain of interest
Step 3 Calibrate spatial radar data with surface gauges measurements
Step 4 Collect short-term rainfall forecasts on the spatio–temporal domain of interest
Step 5 Collect rainfall and flow climatology on the domain of interest
Step 6 Run the Rainfall-Runoff model
Step 7 Make available the probable flood extent and its short term evolution

Data set: Surface rain gauge data


Rainfall time series from surface gauges within the spatio-temporal domain of
Description interest. The dataset consist of rainfall measures on an irregularly distributed set
of points (the location of the rain gauges)
Type Input
Data provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic scope Limited area: ~100 km2
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions (observed)
Scale, resolution Typically 30 rain gauges over the area of interest
Delivery Online (FTP, WFS, SOS) or routine dissemination
Documentation Metadata

Data set: Radar data


Spatial rainfall radar data. Rainfall is computed from reflectivities measured by a
Description network of radars covering the area of interest (for instance polarized X-Band
radars). The dataset consist of rainfall measures on a regularly distributed set of
grid points. When the dataset is an image, each pixel corresponds to a grid-point.
Type Input
Data provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic scope Limited area: ~100 km2
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC - observed)
Scale, resolution 1 km
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 100
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Use Case Description


Delivery Online (FTP, WCS) or routine dissemination
Documentation Metadata

Data set: Short term forecasts


Short-term rainfall forecast data calculated by a fine mesh non hydrostatic model.
Description The dataset consist of rainfall forecasts values on a regularly distributed set of
grid points.
Type input
Data provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic scope Limited area: ~100 km2
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC - nowcasting)
Scale, resolution 1 - 2 km
Delivery Online (FTP, WCS), routine dissemination
Documentation Metadata
Data set: Rainfall and flood climatology
Rainfall and flood reference climatology and derived products (for instance return
Description period of observed / predicted rainfall data) For instance, the dataset will consists
of return period values on a regularly distributed set of grid points.
Type input
Data provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic scope Limited area: ~100 km2
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC - climatology)
Scale, resolution 1km
Delivery Online (FTP, WCS, WFS) or routine dissemination
Documentation Metadada
Data set: Probable flood scenario
Description Product showing the total extent of the flood and its short term evolution
Type Output
Data provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)
Geographic scope Limited area: ~100 km2
Thematic scope Natural Risk Zone
Scale, resolution 1km
Delivery Online (FTP, WCS), routine dissemination
Documentation Metadada
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 101
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Mapping UC datasets to AC-MF model (Informative)


Dataset: Surface rain gauge data
AC-MF Value
Case MultiPointObservation:
phenomenonTime "2011-04-11T12:00:00Z"
resultTime "2011-04-11T12:02:30Z"
observedProperty ObservableProperty
result ReferenceableGridCoverage or
DiscreteCoverageGeometryValuePairs
procedure Process
featureOfInterest SF_SamplingSurface (not detailed. Could be defined as the
polygon surrounding the network of rain gauges)
Case PointTimeSeriesObservation:
phenomenonTime "2011-04-11T12:00:00Z/2011-04-11T13:00:00Z"
resultTime "2011-04-11T13:02:30Z"
observedProperty ObservableProperty
result MultiTimeInstantCoverage
procedure Process
featureOfInterest SF_SamplingPoint (not detailed)

Process
inspireId Identifier (not detailed)
name "SurfaceRainGaugeNetwork"
responsibleParty CI_ResponsibleParty
(ISO 19115 element not detailed)
type "InSituMeasurement"

ObservableProperty
label "5mn Precipitation Amount"
basePhenomenon CF_StandardNamesValue
uom UnitOfMesure
statisticalMeasure StatisticalMeasure
StatisticalMeasure
statisticalFunction StatisticalFunctionTypeValue
aggregationTimePeriod "PT5M"
StatisticalFunctionTypeValue "sum" (CF cell_methods)
CF_StandardNamesValue "http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current#precipitation_
amount"
UnitOfMeasure "kg/m2"

Dataset: Radar data


AC-MF Value
GridObservation
phenomenonTime "2011-04-11T12:00:00Z"
resultTime "2011-04-11T12:03:47Z"
observedProperty ObservableProperty
result RectifiedGridCoverage or
ReferenceableGridCoverage
(ex grid domain definition : 2d geodetic or projected )
procedure Process
featureOfInterest SF_SamplingSolid (not detailed. Could be defined as a volume
surrounding the grid)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 102
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Process
inspireId Identifier (not detailed)
name "post-processing system of radar reflectivity"
responsibleParty CI_ResponsibleParty
(ISO 19115 element not detailed)
type "RemoteSensingMeasurement"

ObservableProperty
label "5mn Precipitation Amount"
basePhenomenon CF_StandardNamesValue
uom UnitOfMesure
statisticalMeasure StatisticalMeasure
StatisticalMeasure
statisticalFunction StatisticalFunctionTypeValue
aggregationTimePeriod "PT5M"
StatisticalFunctionTypeValue "sum" (CF cell method)
CF_StandardNamesValue "http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current#precipitation_am
ount"
UnitOfMeasure "kg/m2"

Dataset: Short Term Forecast


AC-MF Value
GridSeriesObservation
phenomenonTime "2011-04-11T12:00:00Z/2011-04-11T14:00:00Z"
resultTime "2011-04-11T12:05:47Z"
observedProperty ObservableProperty
result RectifiedGridCoverage or
ReferenceableGridCoverage
(ex grid domain definition : 2d geodetic or projected + 1d
temporal)
procedure Process
featureOfInterest SF_SamplingSolid (not detailed. Could be defined as a volume
surrounding the grid)
parameter NamedValue
NamedValue
name "http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inspire/processParameterValue.h
tml#AnalysisTime"
value "2011-04-11T12:00:00:00Z"23

ObservableProperty
label "15mn Precipitation Amount"
basePhenomenon CF_StandardNamesValue
uom UnitOfMesure
statisticalMeasure StatisticalMeasure
StatisticalMeasure
statisticalFunction StatisticalFunctionTypeValue
aggregationTimePeriod "PT15M"
StatisticalFunctionTypeValue "sum" (CF cell method)
CF_StandardNamesValue "http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current#precipitation_am
ount"
UnitOfMeasure "kg/m2"

IR Requirement 1 23 Or model « run »


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 103
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Process
inspireId Identifier (not detailed)
name "Numerical model x"
responsibleParty CI_ResponsibleParty
(ISO 19115 element not detailed)
type "Numerical Simulation"
processParameter ProcessParameter
ProcessParameter
description "the time instant for the initial conditions of a numerical weather
simulation. The analysis Time is chosen from a time-instant
toward the middle of the assimilation window where the model
state is considered to be more realistic"
name ProcessParameterValue
ProcessParameterValue "http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inspire/processParameterValue.h
tml#AnalysisTime"

Dataset: Radar data climatology (case return period of observed rainfall)


AC-MF Value
GridObservation
phenomenonTime "2011-04-11T13:00:00Z"
resultTime "2011-04-11T13:17:50Z"24
parameter NamedValue
observedProperty ObservableProperty
result RectifiedGridCoverage or
ReferenceableGridCoverage
(ex grid domain definition : 2d geodetic or projected )
procedure Process
featureOfInterest SF_SamplingSolid (not detailed. Could be defined as a volume
surrounding the grid)
NamedValue
Name "http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inspire/processParameterValue.h
tml#ReferenceTimePeriod"
value "1980-01-01T00:00:00:00Z/2010-01-01T00:00:00Z" 25

ObservableProperty
label "Return period of 1 hour Precipitation Amount"
basePhenomenon CF_StandardNamesValue
uom UnitOfMesure
statisticalMeasure StatisticalMeasure
StatisticalMeasure
statisticalFunction StatisticalFunctionTypeValue
aggregationTimePeriod "PT1H"
StatisticalFunctionTypeValue "sum" (CF cell method)
CF_StandardNamesValue "http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current#precipitation_am
ount"
UnitOfMeasure Duration (ie : ISO8601 ―P50Y‖ – 50 years)

Process
type "Statistical"
documentation CI_Citation (ISO 19115 metadata object)

IR Requirement 2 24 The time at which statistics are published


IR Requirement 3 25 Period used for statistics (here 30 years)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 104
and Meteorological Geographical Features

responsibleParty CI_ResponsibleParty (ISO19115 metadata object)


processParameter ProcessParameter
ProcessParameter
description "Time Period used for statistics"
name ProcessParameterValue
ProcessParameterValue "http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inspire/processParameterValue.h
tml#ReferenceTimePeriod"
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 105
and Meteorological Geographical Features

B.3 Use Case 2.2 – Flood forecasting short and medium range
Background description

Severe (transnational) fluvial floods frequently occur and have large impact on societies. The
European Environment Agency (EEA) estimated that the large flooding events that occurred in Europe
between 1998 and 2002 caused 700 deaths, displacement of half a million people and 25 billion €
insured economic losses.
To reduce the impacts of floods several early warning systems have been setup by
hydrological and meteorological institutes, recently reinforced by the EU Floods Directive (EU 2007).
These systems simulate hydrological processes in river basins from local to global scales and provide
flood information for stakeholders. A variety of meteorological datasets (observations, model
forecasts) and hydrological datasets are input for the models. The system described in this use case
has two main objectives:

 To complement European Member States activities on flood preparedness and to achieve


longer warning times.
 To provide the European Commission with an overview of ongoing and expected floods in
Europe for improved international aid and crisis management in the case of large transnational
flood events that might need intervention on an international level.

The system is set up for the whole of Europe on a 5-km grid. Twice daily it provides the national
hydrological centres with medium-range ensemble flood forecasting information. In addition, when a
high probability for flooding is forecast, the end users are alerted by e-mail and advised to monitor the
development of the situation using the information system. Forecasts with lead times of 3 to 10 days
are achieved through the incorporation of ensemble and deterministic forecasts.

High Level Use Case

The process can be broadly described as follows:

1: Ingestion of meteorological data


 Observations.
 Deterministic forecasts
 Ensemble forecasts
 Notification of event (non-meteorological)

2: Preprocessing of meteorological data for use in the flooding model:


 Internal procedures (spatial interpolation of point data)
 Pre-processing application for potential evapotranspiration

3: Running the flooding model


4: (Automatic) evaluation of results
5: Visualisation of results
 Hydrographs
 Threshold exceedance maps
 Time series diagrams
 Threshold exceendance tables
 Risk/warning maps
6: In case of flooding event: notification of end users.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 106
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Actors
 Operators
 End users: experts from national hydrological and meteorological services

Data Requirements

The flooding model makes use of static data layers that should be available within INSPIRE at
European scale, such as land use, soil type and texture, river network. The flooding model simulates
canopy and surface processes, soil and groundwater system processes and flow in the river channel.

Detailed Structured Description of Flood forecasting short and medium range Use
Case

Use case 2.2.1 - Monitoring ongoing and expected floods in Europe.

Use Case Description


Name Monitoring ongoing and expected floods in Europe.
Priority High

Description Monitoring ongoing and expected floods in Europe, provide


monitoring information and alerts end users.
Pre-condition System running operationally.

Flow of Events - Basic Path


Step 1 Run flooding forecasts (twice daily).
1.1 Ingest meteorological data.
1.2 Pre-process meteorological data.
1.3 Run flooding model.
1.4 (Automatic) evaluation of results.
1.5 Visualisation of results.
Step 2 Provide results to end users.
2.1 Alert for flooding .
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 107
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Post-condition Results successfully delivered to end users.


Data Source: Short term Deterministic forecast
Description Temporal resolution: staggered, 1h (1-3 days), 3h (4-7 days).
Spatial resolution: staggered, 7km (1-3 days), 40 km (1-3 days).
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
Input fields: 1 (P,T,E).
Bias removal: none.
Down-scaling: dynamic.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)

Geographic Europe
Scope
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Features (MF)

Scale, resolution Temporal resolution: staggered, 1h (1-3 days), 3h (4-7 days).


Spatial resolution: staggered, 7km (1-3 days), 40 km (1-3 days).
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
Delivery FTP

Documentation

Data Source: Long term Deterministic forecast


Description Temporal resolution: staggered, 3h (1-3 days), 6h (4-10 days).
Spatial resolution: +- 40 km
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
Input fields: 1 (P,T,E).
Bias removal: none
Down-scaling: none
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)

Geographic Europe
Scope
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Features (MF)

Scale, resolution Temporal resolution: staggered, 3h (1-3 days), 6h (4-10 days).


Spatial resolution: +- 40 km (TL511L60).
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
Delivery FTP

Documentation
Data Source: Ensemble forecast
Description Temporal resolution: 6h (1-10 days).
Spatial resolution: +- 80 km (TL255L40)
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
Input fields: 50+1 (P,T,E).
Bias removal: none.
Down-scaling: none.
Data Provider Meteorological organisation

Geographic Europe
Scope
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Features (MF)

Scale, resolution Temporal resolution: 6h (1-10 days).


Spatial resolution: +- 80 km (TL255L40).
Times provided: 12:00, 00:00.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 108
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Delivery FTP

Documentation
Data Source: Meteorological observations
Description Temporal resolution daily
Spatial resolution: 50 km (gridded)
Times provided: irregular: typically 23:00
Input fields: P,T,E0, ES0, ET0.
Bias removal: none
Down-scaling: none
Data Provider Meteorological organisation (e.g. national meteorological service)

Geographic Europe
Scope
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Features (MF)

Scale, resolution Temporal resolution daily


Spatial resolution: 50 km (gridded)
Times provided: irregular: typically 23:00
Delivery FTP

Documentation

References

EU. (2007). "Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007
on the assessment and management of flood risks (Text with EEA relevance)." Retrieved
13/07/2010, from http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32007L0060:EN:NOT.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 109
and Meteorological Geographical Features

B.4 Use Case 3.1 - Finding the most interesting locations for new
wind farms
High-level Use Case
This use case is mainly based on information provided by a pilot project. The steps described in the
use case description are adapted to a near future scenario, where the necessary data sets are
available from the EU member states using the INSPIRE SDI and the delivery methods specified by it.
As of writing, the necessary input data sets are gathered from various, mostly off-line sources by the
users.

The process for finding new wind farm locations is basically an iterative data mining and decision
making task, an thus it's difficult to formulate it as a step-wise process. Int the scenario selected for
this use case the wind farm planning engineer does the following rough work steps:

1. Planner finds the most promising geographic areas from the target area using map
visualizations of wind-related geophysical parameters. The existing wind farm locations
act as verification data.
2. The initial set of candidate areas are reduced based on information about existing
transfer networks, high-power electricity networks, land use and natural protection zones
in the vicinity of the candidate areas. The existing infrastructure also helps in pin-pointing
the best wind farms locations within the candidate areas.
3. The potential new wind farm locations and the optimal turbine heights are submitted to a
detailed analysis within the company's planning process.
Actors

 The electricity companies and specialized wind power planning companies in Europe.
 Public sector organizations at national level providing statistical meteorological information
about wind, temperature and humidity conditions from the ground level up to 200m above the
ground.
 Public sector organizations at national and sub-national level providing information about the
existing wind power facilities, transport networks, electricity networks, land use, and natural
protection zones.
Detailed Structured Description of finding the most interesting locations for new wind
farms use case.

Use case 3.1.1 - Find new promising locations for building wind power farms in Europe.

Use Case Description


Name Find new promising locations for building wind power farms in Europe.
Primary actor Companies planning on building new wind power
Goal Planners working for the company have found an initial set of the most promising
new wind farm locations to be included in the detailed analysis.
System under Desktop GIS systems used for wind farm planning able to retrieve geospatial
consideration information from INSPIRE SDI data servers via Internet.
Importance Medium
Wind power engineers use sophisticated models for planning the new wind farms.
To be able to decide the best potential locations for new wind farms, they need
Description many kinds of information besides the actual measured and predicted wind
conditions, like possibility of ice formation on the blades, proximity of electricity
and transport networks, cost of land, building rights and whether there is an
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 110
and Meteorological Geographical Features

existing or planned natural protection area overlapping the planned location.


The cost/benefit ratio for the planned wind turbines at certain wind conditions, the
approximate cost of building new electricity transfer network, the approximate cost
of building new roads to access the planned location for certain land type, existing
Pre-condition wind farms locations with owner information.

The planner has a GIS workstation able to display layers of a map information
over Europe.
Post-condition An identified set of locations worth a more detailed benefit/cost analysis based on
more detailed information.

Flow of Events – Basic Path


Step 1. The planner asks the workstation to display the basic map layer over the Europe.
The planner asks the workstation to display the existing locations for all the wind
Step 2. farms as well as known planned farms to be taken into use within the next 10
years.
The planner asks the workstation to display set statistical wind parameters
visualized as coloured map layers. The planner evaluates the values of these
parameters at different possible vertical turbine heights (50m, 100m, 200m) and
compares them with the optimal values from the specifications of the planned
turbines by the company, and identifies the most suitable locations not already in
wind farm use as well as the existing wind farms with most potential to build new
Step 3. turbines possibly at different heights than the existing ones. The work includes
zooming the map back and forth to verify the findings on a higher resolution map
(up to 1:20000). Note that it's not necessary to have the wind-related statistical
data to be available in highest resolutions. It's pixels will be scaled up if the
background data resolution is higher than the wind data.

The interesting locations are marked on the map with annotations.


The planner asks the workstation to display the most accurate cartographic
information about existing transport networks, primary electricity transfer networks,
Step 4. existing and planned natural protection areas, land type, land use planning, and
approximate cost of land at the selected locations. The most expensive locations
as well as those overlapping natural protection zones are excluded.
Step 5. The planner sends the data set containing the potential wind farms locations to be
used as input in the detailed investment analysis.

Flow of Events – Alternative Paths


NONE

Data set: Basic map data for Europe


Description Basic background maps covering Europe
Type Input
Data provider National mapping agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Coast lines, rivers, lakes, mountain areas, geographical names
Scale, resolution 1:500000 – 1:20000
Delivery Online (WMS)
Documentation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 111
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Data set: Existing wind farms and public plans for new farms
Description Information about the locations and the ownership of the existing wind power
farms and public plans for building new ones.
Type Input
Data provider National and sub-national level agencies responsible for energy planning.
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Wind farms
Scale, resolution 1:20000
Delivery Online (WFS)
Documentation

Data set: Monthly statistical wind speed distribution


Colour maps visualisations for monthly average wind speeds for a typical month
ranging from below 4 m/s to more than 13.5 m/s at 50, 100 and 200 meters above
Description the ground. This gridded data is based on high resolution weather model re-
analysis of the past weather observations for selected, statistically representative
months.
Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind speed coverage
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size), 3 vertical levels
Delivery Online (WMS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Monthly maximum wind speed (over 50 years)


Colour maps visualisations for monthly maximum wind speeds ranging from below
Description 4 m/s to more than 13.5 m/s at 50, 100 and 200 meters above the ground. This
gridded data is based on high resolution weather model re-analysis of the past
weather observations for selected, statistically representative months.
Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind speed coverage
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size),3 vertical levels
Delivery Online (WMS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Monthly statistical strength of wind turbulence


Colour maps visualisations for monthly average wind turbulence at 50, 100 and
Description 200 meters above the ground. This gridded data is based on high resolution
weather model re-analysis of the past weather observations for selected,
statistically representative months.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 112
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Data set: Monthly statistical strength of wind turbulence


Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind turbulence coverage
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size), 3 vertical levels
Delivery Online (WMS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Monthly statistical wind gustiness


Colour maps visualisations for monthly average wind gustiness at 50, 100 and 200
Description meters above the ground. This gridded data is based on high resolution weather
model re-analysis of the past weather observations for selected, statistically
representative months.
Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind gust coverage
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size), 3 vertical levels
Delivery Online (WMS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Monthly statistical vertical wind profile


Description A set of statistical monthly wind speed and direction values at different heights
ranging from the ground level to 200m above ground at each grid point.
Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind speed and direction coverage
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size), 20m vertical resolution
Delivery Online (WFS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Number of months per year for significant blade ice formation probability
Statistical probability for significant ice formation on surfaces similar to wind
Description turbine blades at different vertical heights (50, 100, 200m). Reported as the
average number of months per year with these kind of conditions expected.
Type Input
Data provider National Weather Agencies across Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Atmospheric Conditions, statistical wind speed, air temperature and humidity
coverages
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 113
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Data set: Number of months per year for significant blade ice formation probability
Scale, resolution 250m horizontal resolution (grid cell size), 3 vertical levels
Delivery Online (WMS or WCS)
Documentation

Data set: Existing High-voltage electricity transfer networks


Description High-voltage electricity transfer networks for connecting new power stations.
Type Input
Data provider National and sub-national level agencies responsible for energy planning.
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Energy transfer networks
Scale, resolution 1:500000 – 1:20000
Delivery Online (WFS)
Documentation

Data set: Existing transport networks


Description Road, rail and water networks able to support the construction and servicing of a
wind farm.
Type Input
Data provider National mapping agencies across the Europe
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Transport networks
Scale, resolution 1:500000 – 1:20000
Delivery Online (WFS)
Documentation

Data set: Land use, planning and building rights


Description Land use, plans for land use and building right information
Type Input
Data provider National and sub-national level agencies responsible for land use planning
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Land use, Area management/restriction/regulation zones & reporting units
Scale, resolution 1:500000 – 1:20000
Delivery Online (WFS)
Documentation

Data set: Natural protection zones


Description Existing and planned natural protection zones where building of new wind turbines
is not allowed.
Type Input
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 114
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Data set: Natural protection zones


Data provider National environment agencies
Geographic scope Europe
Thematic scope Natural protection zones
Scale, resolution 1:500000 – 1:20000
Delivery Online (WFS)
Documentation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 115
and Meteorological Geographical Features

B.5 Use Case 3.2 - Climate Impacts


Description
The meteorological organisations (such as national meteorological services) have a history of
providing advice on weather impacts to customers across many sectors, and the provision of climate
impacts advice is a natural extension of these existing activities. Existing and potential customers and
stakeholders, both in government and private sector, are now focusing significantly on climate
impacts. Many sectors are becoming more aware of their weather sensitivity, and climate change
means that we cannot assume that the statistics of weather derived from the historical record are
applicable now and certainly not so in the future.

Some of the organisations or systems for which climate impact assessments are of particular
relevance are:
 Water, Agriculture, Food production;
 Ecosystems, Biodiversity;
 Utilities, Transport, Energy;
 Health, Economics;
 Natural disasters, Security.

The requirements of the users of climate research have changed; rather than simply requiring
evidence for the human contribution to climate change and scenarios of its potential future magnitude,
an increasing number of stakeholders are beginning to require assessment of the likely impacts of
climate change. In general, this is either to inform decisions on the level and nature of action to
mitigate climate change, or to help plan for adaptation. In the latter case, this can be related to both
long-term and short-term changes or variability in climate arising from either natural or anthropogenic
causes.

Here, the term ―Climate Impacts‖ refers to anything which is a consequence of climate change. Some
customer requirements relate to improving resilience against change and variability on seasonal to
decadal timescales – these can often be addressed with similar techniques to those used to assess
the impacts of longer-term climate change. It is for this reason that we use the term ―climate impacts‖
as opposed to ―climate change impacts‖. Indeed, impacts assessments are required over a very large
range of time and space scales, from local impacts over timescales of seasons to the next few years,
to global impacts several decades or more into the future. While there are some exceptions, in general
the short-term, local assessments are required for adaptation while long-term, large-scale
assessments are for informing mitigation.

Most direct impacts are on ―natural‖ process (either physical processes such as river flows, or
biological processes such as ecosystem changes) and these can then exert further impacts on
humans and their economy and society. In some cases, climatic or meteorological processes can
have impacts directly on humans, e.g.: rising temperatures leading to heat stress, or changes in
storminess causing damage to infrastructure with further financial or economic consequences.

In the near term, products will be delivered through the application of existing climate models to
existing impacts models or analysis methods. This bespoke climate and impacts model analysis for
customers ensures that the data and techniques are being applied appropriate for the question from
end to end. This could include new simulations with existing climate models as well as new analysis of
the large number of existing climate model simulations. As well as involving the application of climate
model output to offline impacts models or impacts-focussed climate metrics (e.g.: heat stress, growing
season onset), we will also analyse climate model outputs which relate more directly to impacts, such
as runoff and vegetation productivity.

In the longer term, global scale impacts assessments will be provided using both general circulation
models (GCMs) and Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), which will allow the simulation of crops,
ecosystems, water resources, flooding, irrigation, glaciers, and chemistry impacts all interactively, thus
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 116
and Meteorological Geographical Features

facilitating internally-consistent impacts assessment including non-climatic drivers such as land use
change and atmospheric chemistry.

In the approach described for this use case (which is used by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate
Impacts Analysis team), past climate data are used to ‗baseline‘ the ‗climate risk‘, before the
predictions of the future climate are analysed to identify the future risk. The Climate Impacts and
Risk assessment Framework, or CIRF (pronounced as "serf") [1], represents the standard process
of doing a risk assessment for an organisation or system.

Step 1: Identify the needs, objectives


and extent of the project, including
the required outcomes and
expectations
Step 2: Explore how available datasets
can meet the key requirements
Step 3: Assess existing risks due to the
current weather and climate
Step 4: Assess in detail how the key
risks identified in step 3 are likely to
change in the future
Step 5: Work with the customer to
explore suitable adaptation options
associated with the key risks
Step 6: Communicate clearly the project
results and outcomes
Step 7: Review that the assessment has
met the customer‘s requirements, and
identify future steps to be taken.

Steps 2, 3 & 4 (in blue above) require the


input of weather and climate information,
both past data and future projections.

The main parameters of interest are:


 Temperature
 Precipitation
Although, there are a number of other parameters (e.g. wind, humidity, pressure), which may be useful
for particular impact assessments, and the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) has defined a
much wider set of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) [2].

Gridded datasets in the form of time series or long term averages (e.g. 10 year and 30 year) with
extremes and probabilities of exceeding threshold (of interest to the particular organisation/system)
are most useful, as they provide the coverage required, and allow matching of past and future data.
However, past observations may be useful for particular locations and the assessment of specific
incidents.

Baselining the current climate risk requires past climate data, in the form of:
 Climatological observation records (e.g. Met Office Hadley Centre observations datasets [3])
 Gridded climatologies,
e.g. for the UK UKCP09 5km x 5km grids:
 Daily datasets (1960 to 2006)
 Metrics of precipitation
 Monthly datasets (currently updated to the end of 2005)
 Annual datasets (1961 to 2000)
 Baseline average datasets (1961 to 1990)
 e.g. for Europe the ENSEMBLES daily gridded observational dataset (E-OBS RT5; 0.22 to
0.50 degrees resolution) from the European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D) [8]:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 117
and Meteorological Geographical Features

 Cloud cover
 Wind direction
 Wind speed
 Wind gusts
 Relative humidity
 Sea level pressure
 Precipitation amount
 Snow depth
 Sunshine
 Mean temperature
 Minimum temperature
 Maximum temperature
 Re-analyses, e.g.:
 ERA-Interim, ERA40 (ECMWF) [5]
 ACRE [6]
The future climate risk analysis requires Climate projections for various horizons out to 2100,
including single and multi-model ensembles (with probabilities) and down-scaling using regional
models. e.g.:
 UKCP09 [4], which are based on the Met Office Hadley Centre climate model HadCM3, using
perturbed physics ensembles, with:
o Annual, seasonal and monthly climate averages.
o Individual 25 km grid squares, and for pre-defined aggregated areas.
o Seven 30 year time periods.
o Three emissions scenarios.
o Projections are based on change relative to a 1961–1990 baseline.
 WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset [7], which provides climate projections from a large
26 27 28
29
number of groups in support of IPCC AR4 .

(Seasonal and decadal forecasts are also useful tools to provide a full range of future predictions.)

The process identifies Risk Indicators (a measure of some quantity of interest to the customer, e.g. fire
incidents per day), which are a function of the Hazard (e.g. fire) and the Vulnerability (e.g. population
density). Note that Vulnerability here includes Exposure, which is sometimes treated separately.

The Hazard can be related to the climate variables (e.g. for fire incidents, it may be related to the
number of days with the temperatures above a certain threshold and the precipitation below a certain
threshold). This relationship may be given by an existing model, or past data provided by the customer
can be used to define the relationship.

Vulnerability data may also be provided by the customer or by another competent authority (e.g. social
scientists).

The baseline and future risks are usually shown as a raster plot against and appropriate map overlay,
with time series at a location being used to shown variability over time. Plots with ‗error bars‘ and
probability distribution functions may also be used to show the variability against a mean (either past
or projected).

High Level Use Case


The Use Case diagram below shows all the use cases and actors considered. Use cases are colour-
coded to indicate their focus.

26
World Climate Research Programme
27
Phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
28
Projections against various emissions scenarios
29
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 118
and Meteorological Geographical Features

uc Climate Impacts & Risk Assessment

Customer Impact Climate Impact Weather & Climate Mapping


Assessment Assessment

Prov ide risk,


hazard or
v ulnerabilities
Customer datasets
Dev elop relationships Other Competent
betw een risk, hazard and Authority
v ulnerability, w ith response
«include» Define input
functions and sensitiv ity
diagnostics

«include»
Identify indicators for
risks, hazards &
v ulnerabilities «include»
Explore how available Prov ide map layer

datasets can meet the Map Database


key requirements
«include»

Identify any
important
thresholds for
customers «include»
Identify customer needs, Prov ide past
obj ectiv es & extent of w eather & climate
proj ect, including the data
required outcomes & Climatological
expectations «include» Database
Climate Impacts & Risk
Assessment
«include» Prov ide future
Explore suitable adaptation climate data
options associated w ith the
key risks Gridded Climatalogical
Re-analysis
ClimatologyObserv ations
Database
Database Database
«include»

«include»
Rev iew that the assessment Assess existing risks due
has met customer
requirements, and identify
to the current weather &
future steps to be taken climate

«include» Climate
Proj ections
Database
«include»
Assess in detail how the
Communicate the proj ect Climate Impacts key risks identified are
results & outcomes Scientist
likely to change in the
future
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 119
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Actors

 Climate Impacts Scientist – scientists involved in providing assessing climate impact and risk
 Customer – general class of actor used to describe a wide range of customers
 Other Competent Authority – some agency other than the customer qualified to provide
information required for the impact and risk assessment
 Climatological Database – set of past weather and climate data available
 Climatological Observations Database – time series of point weather and climate
observations
 Gridded Climatology Database – gridded datasets derived from observations
 Re-analysis Database – gridded datasets derived using an NWP model data
assimilation scheme to analyse the observations
 Climate Projections Database – set of future climate projections using difference scenarios
(this includes single and multi-model ensembles)
 Map Database – Database of map overlays at wide range of scales.

Detailed Structured Description of Climate Prediction Impact Use Cases

The climate impact use cases are presented in more detail using the standard template in the
following sections.

Use Case 3.2.1: Explore how available datasets can meet the key requirements
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 120
and Meteorological Geographical Features

uc Explore av ailable datasets

Customer Impact Climate Impact Weather & Climate Mapping


Assessment Assessment

Identify any
important
thresholds for
customers
Customer
«include»
Other Competent
Map Database
Authority

Identify indicators for


risks, hazards &
v ulnerabilities Prov ide risk,
hazard or
v ulnerabilities
Prov ide map
datasets
«include» layer

Explore how available


Prov ide past
datasets can meet the Choose input datasets w eather & climate
«include»
key requirements data
Climate Impacts
Scientist

These may be based on «include»


existing models or be
developed using past data Dev elop relationships Prov ide future
betw een risk, hazard and climate data
v ulnerability, w ith Climatological
response functions and Database
sensitiv ity

«include»

Define input
diagnostics
Need to select past and
future climate data that
can be compared Gridded Climatalogical
Climate Proj ections Re-analysis
Climatology Observ ations
Database Database
Database Database

Explore how available datasets can meet the key


Use Case 3.2.1
requirements
Priority High
Description Climate Impact Scientist works with the customer to decide on the set of past
weather & climate, future climate and other data should be used to assess
the climate impact and risk for a particular customer. They also develop the
relationships between the risk, hazard and vulnerabilities, with assessment of
the response function and the sensitivity, using existing models or past data.
Pre-condition Customer needs, objectives & extent of project, including the required
outcomes & expectations, for the climate impact and risk assessment have
been identified.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Climate Impacts Scientist works with the Customer to identify the Risks,
Hazards and Vulnerabilities Indicators of important to their area of
concern.
Step 2 Customer identifies and important threshold values.
Step 3 Climate Impacts Scientist develops the relationship between the risk,
hazard and vulnerabilities, including the response function and an
assessment of the sensitivity.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 121
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Step 4 Climate Impacts Scientist defines the input diagnostics required for the risk
function (including the inputs to the hazard model)
Step 5 Climate Impacts Scientist chooses the datasets to provide the input
diagnostics for the risk function, and for the calibration of the hazard model, if
required. This includes Past Weather & Climate Data (Climatological
Observations, Gridded Climatologies, Re-analyses), Future Climate
Projections and Risk, Hazard & Vulnerability Data
Post-condition Identified set of input climate and vulnerabilities datasets and a calibrated
hazard model.
Flow of Events - Alternative Path
Additional Step 6 If necessary, the Climate Impacts Scientist develops the hazard model
relationship with the input diagnostics.
Data Source: Risk, Hazards & Vulnerabilities Indicators
Description Risk, hazard and vulnerabilities indicators of importance for the customer‘s
area of concern, including any important threshold values.
Data Provider Customer
Geographic Scope n/a
Thematic Scope n/a
Scale, resolution n/a
Delivery Consultation
Documentation None – dependent on customer
Data Source: Risk, Hazards & Vulnerabilities Datasets
Description Various datasets characterising the risk, hazard and vulnerabilities of
importance for the customers area of concern
Data Provider Customer, Other Competent Authority
Geographic Scope Area of interest (may be national, regional or global)
Thematic Scope Various (depending on customer area of concern)
Scale, resolution Various, but likely to include PointSeries and GridSeries (spatial and temporal
resolution depends on area of interest)
Delivery Various
Documentation None
Data Source: Climatological Observations
Description Point weather and climate observations
Data Provider Competent authorities in the weather and climate domain
Geographic Scope Area of interest (potentially global)
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution PointSeries (typically daily max, min, mean or accumulation, but could be
over various periods)
Delivery Typically space-delimited text files as download
Documentation For example, see: http://www.hadobs.org/
Data Source: Gridded Climatologies for the Country of Interest
Description Grids of climate parameters interpolated from observations
Data Provider Competent authorities in the weather and climate domain
Geographic Scope Country of interest
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (various, but for example for the UK: 5km, daily, monthly, annual
and 30 year means)
Delivery Typically space-delimited text or netCDF files as download
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/ukcp09/index.html
Data Source: Gridded Climatologies for Europe
Description ENSEMBLES daily gridded observational dataset (E-OBS)
Data Provider European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D)
Geographic Scope Europe
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (0.22 – 0.50 degrees, daily 1950 – present)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 122
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Delivery netCDF
Documentation For example, see: http://eca.knmi.nl/download/ensembles/ensembles.php
Data Source: Re-analyses
Description Grids derived using an NWP model data assimilation scheme to analyse the
observations
Data Provider Competent authorities in the weather and climate domain
Geographic Scope Global
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (various spatial & temporal resolutions)
Delivery Typically netCDF file download
Documentation For example, see:
http://www.ecmwf.int/research/era/do/get/Reanalysis_ECMWF
Data Source: Future Climate Projections
Description Set of gridded data of future climate projections using difference scenarios
(this includes single and multi-model ensembles)
Data Provider Competent authorities in the weather and climate domain
Geographic Scope Global
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF)
Scale, resolution GridSeries (various spatial & temporal resolutions)
Delivery Typically netCDF file download
Documentation For example, see: http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/about_ipcc.php
Data Source: Map
Description Geographical map at appropriate scale
Data Provider Various
Geographic Scope Area of interest, potentially anywhere on the globe
Thematic Scope Cadastral Parcels (CP)
Scale, resolution Polygons provided as raster image
Delivery As part of visualisation of other data
Documentation None

Use Case 3.2.2: Assess existing risks due to the current weather & climate
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 123
and Meteorological Geographical Features

uc Assess Current Weather & Climate Risks

Customer Impact Climate Impact Weather & Climate Mapping


Assessment Assessment

Assess existing risks


due to the current Prov ide past w eather &
climate data
weather & climate
Climate Impacts Climatological
Scientist Database

Prov ide map layer


Prov ide risk, hazard or
v ulnerabilities datasets Gridded
Climatalogical
Re-analysis Climatology
Observ ations
Database Database
Database

Map Database
Customer Other Competent
Authority

Use Case 3.2.2 Assess existing risks due to the current weather & climate
Priority High
Description Climate Impacts Scientist assesses the current customer expose to climate
impacts and risks using past climate and weather data. They also
calibrate/baseline the risk function relationship.
Pre-condition Identified set of input climate and vulnerabilities datasets and a calibrated
hazard model.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Climate Impacts Scientist uses the Past Weather & Climate Data
(Climatological Observations, Gridded Climatologies, Re-analyses) and
Risk, Hazard & Vulnerability Data within the risk function and hazard model
relationships to assess the current exposure (and calibrate/baseline the
relationships) to climate and weather.
Step 2 Climate Impacts Scientist reviews the results using various Visualisations
of Risk Indicators
Post-condition Current (baseline) risk understood. Risk function calibrated.
Flow of Events - Alternative Path
Additional Step 1a If relevant the Climate Impacts Scientist may use Climatological
Observations with the Risk, Hazard & Vulnerability Data to investigate
specific events to gain further insight to the hazard model relationship with
the input diagnostics.
Data Source: Climatological Observations (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Gridded Climatologies (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Re-analyses (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Risk, Hazards & Vulnerabilities Data (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Visualisations of Risk Indicators
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 124
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Description Visualisation of risk indicators, as maps (usually filled gridboxes), time series
(possibly with error/range bars) or probability distribution functions (PDFs).
Data Provider Competent authorities in the weather and climate domain
Geographic Scope Area of interest (may be national, regional or global)
Thematic Scope Atmospheric Conditions (AC), Meteorological Geographic Features (MF) and
various others (depending on customer area of concern)
Scale, resolution Grid, Point , PointSeries (spatial and temporal resolution depends on area of
interest)
Delivery GIS tool, webpage or as part of a report
Documentation None
Data Source: Map (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 125
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Use Case 3.2.3: Assess in detail how the key risks identified are likely to change in the future

uc Assess Changes in Risks due to Climate Change

Customer Impact Climate Impact Weather & Climate Mapping


Assessment Assessment

Assess in detail how the


Prov ide future climate
key risks identified are data
likely to change in the
Climate Impacts future Climate
Scientist Proj ections
Database

Prov ide map layer


Prov ide risk, hazard or
v ulnerabilities datasets

Map Database
Customer Other Competent
Authority

Assess in detail how the key risks identified are likely to


Use Case 3.2.3
change in the future
Priority High
Description Climate Impact Scientists assesses the future customer expose to climate
impacts and risks using climate projections.
Pre-condition Current (baseline) risk understood. Risk function calibrated.
Flow of Events - Basic Path
Step 1 Climate Impacts Scientist uses the Future Climate Projections and Risk,
Hazard & Vulnerability Data within the risk function and hazard model
relationships to assess the exposure to future changes in climate and
weather.
Step 2 Climate Impacts Scientist reviews the results using various Visualisations
of Risk Indicators
Post-condition Future risk understood.
Data Source: Future Climate Projection (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Risk, Hazards & Vulnerabilities Data (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
Data Source: Visualisations of Risk Indicators (as per Use Case 3.2.2)
Data Source: Map (as per Use Case 3.2.1)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 126
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Applicability to other themes


The ―Climate Impacts‖ use case can potentially be applied to many of the other INSPIRE themes,
depending on their scope. The following themes currently refer to use of climate data for impacts
evaluation:
 Buildings mentions climate data in several use cases, but does not explicitly reference it as a
data source.
 Environmental Monitoring Facilities mentions climate data in the use case related to the
oceans in relation to climate change monitoring and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive,
but does not explicitly reference AC-MF.
 Natural Risk Zones defines a ―Climate‖ risk category and explicitly refers to the need for AC-
MF climate data in forest fires danger mapping use case.
 Soil explicitly references climate data in two of the use cases, and may have applicability to
further use cases.

There are also a number of themes that do not refer to climate data, but appear to need it for impacts
evaluation:
 Energy Resources appears to have a dependency on climate data for the use cases related to
wind and solar power.
 Human Health and Safety appears to have a dependency on climate data a whole range of
use cases (specific examples include the air quality, and the development and transmission of
diseases), but there is no reference to it.
 Ocean Geographic Features coastal flood hazard map use case could potentially need climate
data, but it is not referenced as a data source.
 Habitats and Biotopes needs climate information in relation to the distribution, the extent and
the ―quality‖ of habitats, but there is no reference to it.
 Bio-geographical Regions needs climate data for analysis and classification of bio-
geographical regions.

References
[1] Prepare: Understand your weather and climate related risks (Climate Impacts and Risk
assessment Framework (CIRF) Data Sheet): http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/publicsector/cirf-
datasheet.pdf

[2] Essential Climate Variables (ECV) Data Access Matrix (GCOS):


http://gosic.org/ios/MATRICES/ECV/ecv-matrix.htm

[3] Met Office Hadley Centre observations datasets: http://www.hadobs.org/

[4] UK Climate Projections (UKCP09):


http://ukclimateprojections.defra.gov.uk/content/view/868/531/

[5] Reanalysis at ECMWF (ERA): http://www.ecmwf.int/research/era/do/get/Reanalysis_ECMWF

[6] Atmospheric Circulation Reconstructions over the Earth (ACRE): http://www.met-acre.org/

[7] WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset (IPCC AR4): http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/about_ipcc.php

[8] European Climate Assessment and Dataset (ECA&D): http://eca.knmi.nl/


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 127
and Meteorological Geographical Features

B.6 Reporting and exchanging of Air Quality data under


2011/850/EU
Introduction
A number of EU legal instruments require EU Member States to monitor and report air quality data;
this information is collated and disseminated by the European Environment Agency (EEA). At present
much of the data is reported electronically by countries, but not necessarily in the best integrated
fashion.
The recent introduction of 2011/850/EU (Commission Implementing Decision of 12 December 2011
laying down rules for Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC as regards the reciprocal exchange of
information and reporting on ambient air quality) provides an opportunity to examine the reporting
process overall to determine how it can be modernised to improve data quality, facilitate data sharing,
and reduce the administrative burden of reporting.
30
The Air Quality Directives‘ (AQD) implementing provisions (AQD IPR) will apply from the end of a 2-
year transitional period commencing at the date of their adoption. Consequently, the decision applies
from 1 January 2014. In order to successfully manage and facilitate the transition process, the
countries‘ reporting agencies, their data providers, and the EEA operational services will need to work
closely together to establish, test and commission a new reporting process. Directive 2008/50/EC
(AQD) requires that the procedures are compatible with Directive 2007/2/EC (INSPIRE).
Reporting and exchange of air quality information under the AQD IPR are of relevance to at least four
of the INSPIRE Annex II/III data specification areas:
 D2.8.II/III.5 Human Health and Safety (HH),
 D2.8.III.7 Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF),
 D2.8.III.11 Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units (AM) and
 D2.8.III.13-14 Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features (AC-MF).

Future electronic reporting of Air Quality data in Europe will therefore need to use the data
specifications from all these thematic areas and it is essential that all four consider the use case of Air
Quality data, which now includes both measurement and modelled data, into account.

Reporting of Air Quality data under implementing decision


2011/850/EU
Emerging logic and optimisation techniques
The anticipated organisation of AQD data flows under the IPR is set out in this section. In populating
the logic for this new system the individual instruments (Articles within the AQD IPR) have been
evaluated and mapped against current reporting data flows. No discrimination has been made
between the administrative scales or hierarchies of the responsible parties involved; under the IPR,
the schemata to be supplied for transmitting and organising reporting data flows are assumed to be
equally applicable to all scales of responsible parties (local, regional, national or federal). Indeed it is
this concept that underpins the realisation of much of the data flow streamlining to be achieved by the
emergent system.
An evaluation of the IPR Articles has been performed and is summarised in the AQD IPR data model
presented in Figure 1. Further details on the individual data flows are also provided – it should be
noted that the diagrams are preliminary and still subject to testing and further developments. As part of
this analysis, the Articles were mapped to current reporting requirements as specified by the FWD,
AQDDs and EoI Decision(s). From this work it is evident and perhaps important to stress, that the
overall content of data flows (existing and emergent) have remained broadly consistent, albeit with
some modifications to the mandatory and voluntary contents, timing and frequency of data flows and
mechanisms or formats for reporting. What is clear is that the organisation of the data flows and their
contents has changed in the effort to remove or reduce duplication in data reporting and to promote

30
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 128
and Meteorological Geographical Features

efficient and discrete management of similar data types. More information is provided in the EEA
31
Technical report 'Reporting and exchanging air quality information using e-Reporting' . As shown in
Figure 2, the data model needs to take all these data flows into account. Figures 3 – 14 describe the
different data flows in more detail. Table 1 shows how the different data flows relate to the various
INSPIRE data specification themes.
The IPR decision (2011/850/EU) contains a number of articles that describes how the Air Quality data
that is requested by the directives (2008/50/EC) and (2004/107/EC) shall be delivered and how data
flow shall be implemented. Articles 1 to 5 are introductory while articles 6 to 14 provide information on
data flows that shall be put in place. As shown in Figure 11, the data model needs to take all these
data flows into account.

Overview of data flows

Figure 11: Overview of emergent AQD IPR data model and data flows

Table 7: Overview of the different air quality data flows and how they are related to the different INSPIRE
Annex III themes.
Article no./data
AC-MF EF HH AM
flow
Information on
zones and
X
agglomerations
(Article 6)

31
http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/reporting-and-exchanging-air-quality
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 129
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Information on the
assessment regime X X X
(Article 7)
“Methods for
subtraction of
X X X
exceedances”
(Article 8)
Information on the
assessment
X X
methods (Articles 8
and 9)
Information on
primary validated
X
assessment data
(Article 10)
Information on
generated
aggregated data -
X
primary validated
measurements
(Article 11)
Information on the
attainment of
environmental X X
objectives (Article
12)
Information on air
quality plans X X
(Article 13)
Information on
measures (Articles
X X
13 and 14)
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 130
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Article 6 Zones and agglomerations

Figure 12: Data flow for reporting of zones and agglomerations within the Air Quality Directive

Table 2: Reporting of zones and agglomerations.


Name Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6)
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health,
paying particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to
improve the monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants
and to provide information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
consideration
Importance High
Description Provision of information on delimitation and types of zones and agglomerations
Pre-conditions Quality checked information on the boundaries and typologies of zones and agglomerations for air
quality management are available in national system
Post-condition The information on the assessment regime to be applied in the following calendar year for each
pollutant within individual zones and agglomerations
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform information on the assessment regime into agreed reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data in agreed reporting format
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (upload to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes in national system.
Background Documentation
AQD IPR http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
2011/850/EU
E-reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal

Article 7 Assessment regimes


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 131
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 13: Data flow for reporting of Assessment regimes within the Air Quality Directive

The different steps of the reporting for Article 7 are also presented in the table below.

Table 3: Reporting of assessment regime.


Name Reporting information on the assessment regime (Article 7)
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
consideration
Importance High
Description Member States shall make available the information on the assessment regime to be applied in the
following calendar year for each pollutant within individual zones and agglomerations
Pre-conditions  Assessment thresholds for each individual zone and agglomeration in accordance with
Article 4 of Directive 2004/107/EC and Articles 5 and 9 of Directive 2008/50/EC.are
available in national system
 Meta information for operational measurement networks including quality procedures in
national air quality system and meta information for models including quality procedures
in national air quality system (Articles 8 and 9) reported.
 Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6) reported
Post-condition The information on the assessment regime to be applied in the following calendar year for each
pollutant within individual zones and agglomerations
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform information on the assessment regime into agreed reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data in agreed reporting format
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (upload to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes in national system.
Background Documentation
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 132
and Meteorological Geographical Features

AQD IPR http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF


2011/850/EU
AQ Directive http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0050:EN:NOT
2008/50/EC
4th Daughter http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004L0107:en:NOT
Directive
2004/107/EC
E-reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal

Article 8 Methods for the demonstration and subtraction of exceedances attributable


to natural sources or to winter- sanding or –salting and Article 9 Assessment methods

Figure 14: Data flow for reporting of methods used for subtraction of measurements exceeding
legal Air Quality thresholds. Measurements exceeding thresholds that can be proved to be
attributable to natural or external sources will not be taken into account when number of days
with exceedences are summarised for a year
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 133
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 15: Data flow for reporting of Air Quality assessment methods

The different steps required for reporting of assessment methods are also described in the table
below. This combines both articles 8 and 9.

Table 4: Reporting of assessment methods


Name Reporting of information on the assessment methods (Articles 8 and 9)
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
consideration
Importance High
Description Provision of metadata for the assessment, describing the methods and the supporting
information.
Pre-  Meta information for operational measurement networks including quality
conditions procedures in national air quality system
 Meta information for models including quality procedures in national air quality
system
Post- The assessment methods (metadata for networks, stations, instruments, analytical methods for
condition measurements and metadata for models) for the primary data are available in order to provide
traceability for subsequently reported primary data
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform meta information inventories relating to primary data from national air quality
system into agreed reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data in agreed reporting format
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (upload to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes in national system.
Background Documentation
AQD IPR http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
2011/850/EU
E reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 134
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Article 10 Primary validated assessment data and primary up-to-date assessment data
Three type of primary assessment data are covered in this section: validated measurements from fixed
stations, validated measurements obtained from air models and preliminary measurements from fixed
stations. Preliminary measurements have not yet undergone the full set of quality controls but are
made available in order to provide up-to-date data.

Primary validated measurement data

Figure 16: Validated measurement data

The different steps required for reporting of primary validated measurement data are also described in
the table below.

Table 5: Reporting of primary validated measurement data


Name Reporting of information on primary validated assessment data -measurement (Article 10)
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
consideration
Importance High
Description Provision for reporting of validated un-aggregated concentration levels from fixed stations in
order to maintain the existing EoI exchange mechanism on fixed monitoring stations and related
data that feeds into AirBase
Pre-  Operational measurement networks including quality procedures in place
conditions  Validated measurements results for relevant components (pollutants) available in
national air quality system
(pollutant/component measured, measurement value, time stamp, validity flag plus key
to retrieve metadata (networks,stations,instruments,methods) reported under Articles 8
and 9)
 Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6) reported
 Information on the assessment regime (Article 7) reported
 Information on the assessment methods (Articles 8 and 9) reported
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 135
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Post- Information on primary validated assessment data -measurements are available in air
condition quality data repository (CDR) and are consistent with information under Articles 6,7, 8 and 9
as documentation of the calculation of exceedances in air quality management zones
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform validated primary measurement data from national air quality system into agreed
reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (deliver to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes to data in national system.
Documentation
AQD IPR http://eur-
2011/850/EU lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
E reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal

Primary validated model data

Figure 17: Validated modelled data. Note that the diagram is still not adapted to the special
features of model data.

The different steps required for reporting of primary validated modelled data are also described in the
table below.

Table 6: Reporting of validated modelled data


Name Reporting of information on primary validated assessment data -modelled (Article 10)
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
consideration
Importance High
Description Provision for reporting of un-aggregated concentration levels from AQ modelling
Pre-  Appropriate modelling capacity including quality procedures are in place
conditions  Validated results of modelling exercise
(pollutant/component (s) modelled, modelled values, time stamp, validity flag plus key
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 136
and Meteorological Geographical Features

to retrieve metadata for model reported under Articles 8 and 9)


available in national air quality system
 Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6) reported
 Information on the assessment regime (Article 7) reported
 Information on the assessment methods (Articles 8 and 9) reported
Post- Information on primary validated assessment data -modelled are available in air quality
condition data repository (CDR) and are consistent with information reported under Articles 6,7, 8 and 9
for documentation of the calculation of exceedances in air quality management zones
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform modelled primary data from national air quality system into agreed reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data in agreed reporting format
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (upload to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes in national system.
Background Documentation
AQD IPR http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
2011/850/EU
E reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal

Primary up-to-date data

Figure 18: Primary up-to-date measurement data. The term Near Real Time (NRT) data has
previously been used for such data.

The different steps required for reporting of primary up-to-date measurement data are also described
in the table below.

Table 7: Reporting of up-to-date measurement data


Name Reporting of information on primary up-to-date assessment data -measurement (Article
10)

Primary actor National AQ data reporter


Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 137
and Meteorological Geographical Features

consideration
Importance High
Description Provision for reporting as soon as possible of un-aggregated concentration levels from fixed
stations. The measurement results have not yet passed the full range of quality checks and
therefore are subject to change.
Pre-  Operational measurement networks including quality procedures in place
conditions  Up-to-date measurements results for relevant components (pollutants) available in
national air quality system
(pollutant/component measured, measurement value, time stamp, validity flag plus key
to retrieve metadata (networks,stations,instruments,methods) reported under Articles 8
and 9)
 Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6) reported
 Information on the assessment methods (Articles 8 and 9) reported
Post- Primary up-to-date assessment data -measurements are available at an agreed internet location
condition and are consistent with information under Articles 6, 8 and 9
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform up-to-date primary measurement data from national air quality system into agreed
reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available at agreed internet location.
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes to data in national system.
Documentation
AQD IPR http://eur-
2011/850/EU lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
E-reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 138
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Article 11 Aggregated validated assessment data

Figure 19: Validated aggregated measurement data.

Figure 20: Validated aggregated modelled data. Note that the diagram is still not adapted to the
special features of model data.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 139
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 21: Aggregated up-to-date measurement data. The term Near Real Time (NRT) data has
previously been used for such data.

Article 12 Attainment of environmental objectives

Figure 12 Attainment of environmental objectives. Examples of the required environmental


objectives for selected pollutants are provided in Section 3.1

Table 8: Reporting of information on the attainment of environmental objectives


Name Reporting of information on the attainment of environmental objectives (Article 12 )
Primary actor National AQ data reporter
Goal The need to reduce pollution to levels which minimise harmful effects on human health, paying
particular attention to sensitive populations, and the environment as a whole, to improve the
monitoring and assessment of air quality including the deposition of pollutants and to provide
information to the public.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 140
and Meteorological Geographical Features

System under Reporting of air quality under AQD IPR 2011/850/EU


consideration
Importance High
Description Declaration for individual zones and agglomerations as to whether the relevant environmental
objectives have been met.
Pre-conditions  Information on the attainment of environmental objectives for individual zones and
agglomerations is available in the national system
 Information on zones and agglomerations (Article 6) reported
 Information on the assessment regime (Article 7) reported
 Information on the assessment methods (Articles 8 and 9) reported
 Information on the primary validated data (Article 10) reported
 Information on the aggregated primary validated data (Article 11) reported
Post-condition  The information on the attainment of environmental objectives is available for each
zone and agglomeration and the data underpinning the declaration is traceable,
consistent and available.
 In cases where the environmental objective is a limit value which is in force, the
information shows whether the Member State is in compliance with the Air Quality
Directive 2008/50/EC.
Flow of events – Basic path
Step 1 Transform information on the attainment of environmental objectives for individual zones and
agglomerations from national air quality system into agreed reporting format
Step 2 Carry out post transformation quality checks on data in agreed reporting format
Step 3 Make data in agreed reporting format available (upload to CDR).
Step 4 Receive results of post delivery quality checks (carried out in CDR)
Step 5 If results are negative, make required changes in national system.
Background Documentation
AQ Directive http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0050:EN:NOT
2008/50/EC
4th Daughter http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004L0107:en:NOT
Directive
2004/107/EC
AQD IPR http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:335:0086:0106:EN:PDF
2011/850/EU
E reporting http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal

Article 13 Air quality plans


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 141
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Figure 22: Data flow for reporting of Air Quality plans.

Article 14 Measures to comply with the target values of Directive 2004/107/EC

Figure 23: Data flow for reporting of measures to comply with the target values of Directive
2004/107/EC (reporting of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in ambient air).

Air Quality pollutants with monitoring requirements referred to in


Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC
The air quality directives describe a number of pollutants that shall be monitored by the Member
States. These are given in the table below. Pollutant names are listed together with chemical formula
and unit. Information on the observable property value for reporting under INSPIRE will be made
available at the portal http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 142
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Note: A list of further pollutants on which Member States shall have reciprocal data exchange, as
available, is kept by the European Environment Agency and is made available at the portal
http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal.

Table 9: Overview of pollutants with monitoring requirements in the Directives 2004/107/EC and
2008/50/EC.

Pollutant name Pollutant formula Units


Sulphur dioxide SO2 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide NO2 µg/m³
1
Nitrogen oxides NOx µg/m³
Ozone O3 µg/m³
Carbon Monoxide CO mg/m³
Particulate matter less than 10 PM10 µg/m³
microns
Particulate matter less than 2.5 PM2.5 µg/m³
microns
Sulphate in PM2.5 SO42+ in PM2.5 µg/m³
-
Nitrate in PM2.5 NO3 in PM2.5 µg/m³
+
Ammonium in PM2.5 NH4 inPM2.5 µg/m³
Elemental Carbon in PM2.5 elem. C in PM2.5 µg/m³
Organic Carbon in PM2.5 org. C in PM2.5 µg/m³
Calcium in PM2.5 Ca2+ in PM2.5 µg/m³
Magnesium in PM2.5 Mg2+ in PM2.5 µg/m³
Potassium in PM2.5 K+ in PM2.5 µg/m³
Sodium in PM2.5 Na+ in PM2.5 µg/m³
-
Chloride in PM2.5 Cl in PM2.5 µg/m³
Lead in PM10 Pb in PM10 µg/m³
Cadmium in PM10 Cd in PM10 ng/m³
Arsenic in PM10 As in PM10 ng/m³
Nickel in PM10 Ni in PM10 ng/m³
wet/total Pb deposition Pb deposition µg /m².day
wet/total Cd deposition Cd deposition µg /m².day
wet/total As deposition As deposition µg /m².day
wet/total Ni deposition Ni deposition µg /m².day
wet/total Hg deposition Hg deposition µg /m².day
0
elemental gaseous Mercury Hg ng/m³
0
Total gaseous Hg Hg + Hg-reactive ng/m³
reactive gaseous Mercury Hg-reactive ng/m³
particulate Mercury Hg in PM10 ng/m³
Benzo(a)pyrene in PM10 B(a)P in PM10 ng/m³
Benzo(a)anthracene in PM10 Benzo(a)anthracene in PM10 ng/m³

Benzo(b)fluoranthene in PM10 Benzo(b)fluoranthene in PM10 ng/m³


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 143
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Benzo(j)fluoranthene in PM10 Benzo(j)fluoranthene in PM10 ng/m³

Benzo(k)fluoranthene in PM10 Benzo(k)fluoranthene in PM10 ng/m³

Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene in PM10 Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene in PM10 ng/m³

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene in PM10 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene in PM10 ng/m³

Benzo(a)pyrene deposition B(a)P µg /m².day


Benzo(a)anthracene deposition Benzo(a)anthracene µg /m².day
Benzo(b)fluoranthene deposition Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg /m².day
Benzo(j)fluoranthene deposition Benzo(j)fluoranthene µg /m².day
Benzo(k)fluoranthene deposition Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg /m².day
Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene deposition Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)pyrene µg /m².day
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene deposition Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene µg /m².day
Benzene C6H6 µg/m³
Ethane C2H6 µg/m³
Ethene (ethylene) C2H4 µg/m³
Ethyne (acetylene) HCCH µg/m³
Propane H3C-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
Propene CH2=CH-CH3 µg/m³
n-butane H3C-CH2-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
2-methylproprane (i-butane) H3C-CH(CH3)2 µg/m³
1-butene H2C=CH-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
trans-2-butene H3C-CH=CH-CH3 µg/m³
cis-2-butene H3C-CH=CH-CH3 µg/m³
1,3-butadiene CH2=CH-CH=CH2 µg/m³
n-pentane H3C-(CH2)3-CH3 µg/m³
2-methylbutane (i-pentane) H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)2 µg/m³
1-pentene H2C=CH-CH2-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
2-pentene H3C-HC=CH-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene) CH2=CH-C(CH3)=CH2 µg/m³
n-hexane C6H14 µg/m³
2-methylpentane (i-hexane) (CH3)2-CH-CH2-CH2-CH3 µg/m³
n-heptane C7H16 µg/m³
n-octane C8H18 µg/m³
2,2,4-trimethylpentane (i-octane) (CH3)3-C-CH2-CH-(CH3)2 µg/m³
Toluene C6H5-C2H5 µg/m³
Ethyl benzene m,p-C6H4(CH3)2 µg/m³
m,p-xylene o-C6H4-(CH3)2 µg/m³
o-xylene C6H3-(CH3)3 µg/m³
1,2,4-trimethylbenzene C6H3(CH3)3 µg/m³
1,2,3-trimethylbenzene C6H3(CH3)3 µg/m³
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene C6H3(CH3)3 µg/m³
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 144
and Meteorological Geographical Features

total non methane Hydrocarbons THC(NM) µg/m³


Methanal (formaldehyde) CH2O µg/m³

Environmental Objectives
The table shows the environmental objectives for selected pollutants. See 2011/850/EC Annex 1(B)
for full list of environmental objectives.
Table 10: Environmental objectives for selected pollutants.

Formula Protection Environmental Averaging Reporting metric Numerical


target Objective type period of of environmental values of the
assessments objective environmental
objective
(allowed
number of
exceedances)
Pollutants for which up-to-date and validated data have to be reported
NO2 Health Limit value 1 hour Hours in 200 μg/m 3
(LV) exceedance in a (18)
calendar year
NO2 Health Limit value 1 hour Hours in 200 μg/m 3
plus margin of exceedance in a (18)
tolerance calendar year
(LVMT)
NO2 Health Limit value 1 calendar Annual average 40 μg/m 3
(LV) year
NO2 Health Limit value 1 calendar Annual average 40 μg/m 3
plus margin of year
tolerance
(LVMT)
NO2 Health Alert threshold 1 hour Three 400 μg/m 3
(ALT) consecutive
hours in
exceedance (at
locations
representative of
air quality over at
least 100 km 2 or
an entire zone or
agglomeration,
which ever is
smaller)
NOx Vegetation Critical level 1 calendar Annual average 40 μg/m 3
(CL) year
PM10 Health Limit value 1 day Days in 50 μg/m 3 (35)
(LV) exceedance in a Percentile of
calendar year 90,4
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 145
and Meteorological Geographical Features

PM10 Health limit value (LV) 1 calendar Annual average 40 μg/m 3


year
PM10 Health Assessment of 1 day Deducted days in n/a
winter-sanding exceedance in a
and -salting calendar year
(WSS)*
PM10 Health Assessment of 1 calendar Deduction of n/a
winter-sanding year annual average
and -salting
(WSS)*
PM10 Health Assessment of 1 day Deducted days in n/a
natural exceedance in a
contribution( calendar year
NAT)*
PM10 Health Assessment of 1 calendar Deduction of n/a
natural year annual average
contribution
(NAT)*

Pollutants for which only validated data have to be reported


Benzene Health Limit value ( 1 calendar Annual average 5 μg/m 3
LV) year
Lead Health Limit value 1 calendar Annual average 0.5 μg/m 3
(LV) year
Cadmium Health Target value 1 calendar Annual average 5 ng/m 3
(TV) year
Arsenic Health Target value 1 calendar Annual average 6 ng/m 3
(TV) year
Nickel Health Target value 1 calendar Annual average 10 ng/m 3
(TV) year
B(a)P Health Target value 1 calendar Annual average 1 ng/m 3
(TV) year

* No up-to-date data is to be made available


INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 146
and Meteorological Geographical Features
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 147
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex C
(normative)
Code list values

INSPIRE Application Schema 'Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features'

EU_AirQualityReferenceComponentValue
Name: EU Air Quality Reference Component Value
Definition: Definitions of phenomena regarding air quality in the context of reporting under Union
legislation.
Extensibility: any
Identifier: http://www.eionet.europa.eu/aqportal/codelists
Parent: PhenomenonTypeValue
Values:

GRIB_CodeTable4_2Value
Name: WMO GRIB Code Table Table 4_2 Value
Definition: Definitions of phenomena observed in meteorology.
Extensibility: any
Identifier: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/I01/current
Values:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 148
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex D
(informative)

Temporal Aspects

Guidelines for the use of Observations & Measurements [reference D2.9] gives a general description
on how to use of phenomenonTime, resultTime and validTime for Inspire Annex II and III data
specifications. However, meteorological data involve several additional types of time information. This
informative annex gives some illustrative examples on how to specify nominal analysis time, issue
time of forecasts, and aggregation time periods thus giving a mapping from traditional terminology in
operational meteorology to O&M and the AC-MF model.

Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Model Forecast Runs


For numerical weather predictions, another important time point in a forecast run (in addition to the
phe-nomenon time) is the nominal analysis time. This time point is used to distinguish consecutive
forecast runs from each other. The nominal analysis time is nominal in the sense that the actual start
of the obser-vation assimilation and forecasting may not occur exactly at the nominal analysis time
point. Instead, the nominal analysis time indicate approximately when the forecast was scheduled to
run from. In addition to the nominal analysis time, the process of producing a forecast involves several
additional time points:

- actual start of observation assimilation which may be slightly later or earlier than the nominal analysis
time
- actual start of analysis (typically after the nominal analysis time).
- cut-off time for observations used in the assimilation
- start of forecast computation
- end of forecast computation
- time when results are available

Note: in this specification we avoid using the term reference time since it can refer to the analysis time,
the start of forecast or the even the verifying time of forecast (phenomenon time at which forecast is
compared with reality).

In most use-cases, time information on these individual steps is not necessary and can be omitted.
How-ever, if a data provider wants to represent the timing of individual steps, then
Process.processParameter could be used.

See below an example of process parameters for analysis time and assimilation window for a global
forecast model (See D2.9 version 1.0 section 5.4.1.2)

Process
- name: ukmo_global_model
- documentation: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/modelling-
systems/unifiedmodel/weatherforecasting
- processParameter: http://inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AnalysisTime
- processParameter: http://inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AssimilationWindowBegin
- processParameter: http:// inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AssimilationWindowEnd

OM_Observation
- phenomenonTime: 2011-05-15T00:00:00+00:00 ; 2011-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
- resultTime: 2011-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
- parameter:
Name: http://inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AnalysisTime,
Value: 2011-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
-parameter:
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 149
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Name: http://inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AssimilationWindowBegin,
Value: 2011-05-14T20:00:00+00:00
-parameter:
Name: http:// inspire.europe.eu/processParameterValue.html#AssimilationWindowEnd,
Value: 2011-05-15T02:00:00+00:00

Meteorological observations
A meteorological observation such as a SYNOP telegram is the result of an OM_Observation rather
than an OM_Observation in itself (N.B. observation being a homonym). The actual OM_Observation
corre-sponds to the act of measuring a property (i.e. the automated process of measuring
temperatures in synoptic stations). It is not uncommon that the phenomenonTime of slightly early or
late synoptic observations are rounded to the nearest "synoptic" hour. E.g. an observation event
occuring at 06.03Z would be reported with phenomenon time of 06Z.

The resultTime could be either the time of observation (coinciding with the phenomenon time instant)
or the time instant when the data was made available after quality control.

validTime may be omitted for meteorological observations (implying that observations are useful for an
indefinite time period, in contrast to forecasts).

Time-series of observations
Each observation has a result that contains values of some property (e.g. temperature) for a specific
phenomenon time point or time interval. For SamplingCoverages such as PointObservation and
GridObservation, the entire observation refers to a single TM_Instant in the real world (past or future).
However, for other SamplingCoverages (e.g. ProfileObservation, PointTimeSeriesObservation and
TrajectoryObservation), the result may represent different time points or intervals in the real world.
Here the phenomenon time for the OM_Observation is the temporal extent for the entire observation
but individual value will have an additional timestamp in the result.

A common example would be a time series of meteorological measurement from a single observing
station packaged into a single coverage (e.g. a PointTimeSeriesObservation). Here the phenomenon
time interval would cover the entire time series from start to end, whereas the individual timepoints for
the measurements are stored in the resulting coverage.

Below an example of a temperature time series encoded with swe:DataRecordType.

<swe:values>
2012-01-27T00:00:00+00:00 , 264.84
2012-01-27T01:00:00+00:00 , 262.74
2012-01-27T03:00:00+00:00 , 262.74
</swe:values>

Analysis runs
In terms of O&M, an analysis run in an O&M observation whose result is an analysis product with
values of some property (e.g. temperature) for a specific point in time. Here, the resultTime describes
the time when the result became available, i.e. when the analysis was completed and the result was
available (commonly known as the issue time of the analysis). The phenomenon time (TM_Object,
Mandatory) of O&M defines the time period the analysis product covers (may be a time instant rather
than a time period). The O&M validTime (TM_Object, Optional) describes the time period during which
the result is intended to be used (typically until the next analysis run is scheduled to be available). For
analysis products the validTime may be omitted.

Aggregations
Aggregated observed properties involves additional temporal aspects that can be handled with statisti-
calMeasure.

Example 1: Daily average temperature


OM_ObservableProperty
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 150
and Meteorological Geographical Features

- basePhenomenon: "air_temperature" (from the CF Standard Names registry of ObservableProper-


tyValue).
- uom: ―Kelvin‖

Combined with a

StatisticalMeasure
- statisticalFunction: "average" (from registry of StatisticalFunctionTypeValue).
- aggregationTimePeriod: "24:00:00"

Example 2: Three hour maximum wind speed (mean wind)


There are several complex types of properties which involve multiple temporal aspects. E.g. the maxi-
mum wind speed (mean wind) as found in BUFR B011041 is defined as the 3 hour maximum of
samples consisting of 15 minute averages. None of the O&M time information attributes captures this
information. Instead, maximum of average wind would be defined as a ObservableProperty based on
the base-Phenomenon ―wind speed‖ with an additional StatisticalMeasure with statisticalFunction
―maximum‖ and the aggregationTimePeriod ―03:00:00‖. This constraint would be derivedFrom a
second StatisticalMeasure with statisticalFunction ―average‖ and the aggregationTimePeriod
―00:15:00‖.

Example 3: 12-hour accumulated precipitation amount


Accumulation in another example of addition time aspect. Again, the ObservableProperty can be com-
bined with a StatisticalMeasure to define the length of the accumulation period.

ObservableProperty
- basePhenomenon: ―precipitation amount‖
- uom:‖kilogram per square metre‖

StatisticalMeasure
- statisticalFunction: "sum‖
- aggregationTimePeriod: "12:00:00"

Example 4: Wind speed gust


The averaging time period for gusts varies: 3 seconds is typically acknowledge as gust however there
are many other time intervals in use. The period is as a StatisticalMeasure.

ObservableProperty
- basePhenomenon: ―wind_speed_of_gust‖
- uom: ―metre per second‖

StatisticalMeasure
- statisticalFunction: "average"
- aggregationTimePeriod: "00:00:03"

Complex temporal aspects


An example of such a properties is the accumulated dose of ozone Over a Threshold of 40 ppb for
crops (AOT40). The definition is the sum of the differences between hourly concentrations greater
than 80 μg/m3 (= 40 parts per billion) and 80 μg/m3:

AOT40measured = _ max(0, (C(i) - 80))

where C(i) is the hourly mean ozone concentration in μg/m3 and the summation is over all hourly
values measured between 8.00 – 20.00 Central European Time(**) each day and for days in the 3
month growing season crops from 1 May to 31 July.

Since AOT40 is a Sum, the observable property would be associated with a statistical measure but the
sum is not over a continuous TM_Duration.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 151
and Meteorological Geographical Features

When observed properties cannot be expressed with StatisticalMeasure, ScalarConstraint,


RangeCon-straint or CategoryConstraint the model includes otherConstraint that allows free text
descriptions.

Climatology
Climatological Mean Values are calculated from multiple years averages of quantities which are them-
selves means over some period of time less than a year. These are described in a similar manner with
StatisticalMeasure chained through derivedFrom with another StatisticalMeasure .

Reanalysis products
For reanalysis, the resultTime defines when the reanalysis was completed. In other respects, see
NWP data above.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 152
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex E
(informative)
Mandated and recommended parameter mappings to GRIB
Descriptions & CF Standard Names

GRIB2
Code
Parameter (discipline, CF Standard Name
Description
category,
number)
Wind speed 0, 2, 1 Wind speed wind_speed
Wind direction 0, 2, 0 Wind direction (from which blowing) wind_from_direction
temperature 0, 0, 0 Temperature air_temperature
Relative humidity 0, 1, 1 Relative humidity relative_humidity
evaporationAmount 0, 1, 6 Evaporation water_evaporation_amoun
t
precipitationAmoun 0, 1, 52 Total precipitation rate + type of statistical precipitation_amount
t (+ 4,.10, 1) processing = accumulation (or Total
(or 0, 1, 8) precipitation (depreciated) )
windSpeedGust 0, 2, 22 Wind speed (gust) wind_speed_of_gust
precipitation rate 0, 1, 52 Total precipitation rate (or Precipitation rate precipitation_flux
(or 0, 1, 7) (depreciated))
precipitation type 0, 1, 19 Precipitation type, refering to GRIB Code NONE
Table 4.201
1 Rain
2 Thunderstorm
3 Freezing Rain
4 Mixed/Ice
5 Snow
total now depth 0, 1, 11 Snow depth surface_snow_thickness
Pressure reduced 0, 3, 1 Pressure reduced to MSL air_pressure_at_sea_level
to mean sea level
total cloud cover 0, 6, 1 Total cloud cover cloud_area_fraction
visibility 0, 19, 0 Visibility visibility_in_air
global solar 0, 4, 3 Global radiation flux surface_downwelling_shor
radiation twave_flux_in_air
long-wave radiation 0, 5, 5 Net long wave radiation flux surface_net_upward_long
wave_flux
short-wave 0, 4, 9 Net short wave radiation flux surface_net_upward_short
radiation wave_flux
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 153
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex F
(informative)
Binary encoding formats typically used for the result grid coverage
data of meteorological and atmospheric data sets

As stated in the guidelines for the encoding of spatial data [INSPIRE D2.7 3.0], there is no best
practice solution for integration of meteorological data within a spatial data infrastructure. The data
volume of meteorological and atmospheric datasets makes it impracticable to use XML-based
encodings only. Two efficient code forms have been developed and juridically approved for
international exchange of meteorological data and are widely used within the meteorological
community at large, namely, GRIB (mainly for gridded data) and BUFR. . The third format presented
here is CF-NetCDF, which has wide adoption in the scientific community, and thus may be more
accessible to non-meteorologists than GRIB and BUFR, but does not have a de jure status.

F.1 WMO GRidded Binary (GRIB)


GRIB is a binary data format for exchange of processed meteorological data in the form of values
typically located at an array of grid points. This format is used primarily to exchange numerical
forecasts, hindcasts and analysis-data among national weather services and other users. The
definition of grids, products and data representations in GRIB is handled through template numbers; if
a new product, grid or type of data representation is needed, the new template(s) go through a formal
process for WMO approval, as described in the WMO Manual on Codes [WMO 306].

In section 1, (identification section) the originating centre and sub-centre must be provided. Since this
information is not present in the AC-MF model, the Common Code Table C-1 should be consulted.
Several entities in the model for Atmospheric Conditions lack corresponding entry in the public GRIB-
templates.

For a complete documentation on GRIB, refer to the WMO Manual on Codes [WMO 306].

F.2 Binary Universal Form for the Representation of meteorological


data (BUFR)
BUFR is a binary encoding developed by WMO mainly for the exchange of non-gridded data,
essentially measurements from observing stations. BUFR is a table-driven code form where the
meaning of data elements is determined by referring to a set of tables that are kept and maintained
separately from the message itself.

To be compatible with existing software, BUFR-messages should conform to the BUFR-templates


defined by WMO. For instance, atmospheric conditions represented by SF_SamplingPoint could be
coded with the template TM307080 developed for point-wise synoptic reports.
Many data elements in the WMO BUFR-templates have no corresponding attributes in the AC-MF
model. For those missing data elements, the recommendation is to include the data-elements in the
BUFR-telegram, but mark the value of those data elements to missing (BUFR reserves the highest
value of a data element domain as a missing value indicator where all bits in the bitstream are set to
1's).

The BUFR templates require identification of originating/generating centre, sub-centre and station (or
site) name. If applicable, the information published in the WMO publication No. 9, Volume A,
Observing Stations [WMO 9] should be used.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 154
and Meteorological Geographical Features

F.3 Network Common Data Form (NetCDF)


NetCDF (network Common Data Form) is a data model for array-oriented scientific data, a freely
distributed collection of access libraries implementing support for that data model, and a machine-
independent format. Together, the interfaces, libraries and format, support the creation, access and
sharing of multidimensional scientific data. NetCDF format is being developed by Unidata and different
NetCDF variants have been adopted by organizations like Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and
NASA. NetCDF has recently become an OGC standard [OGC 10-090], [OGC 10-092].

NetCDF-CF encoding format is netCDF conforming to the Climate and Forecast (CF) conventions
which provide the necessary semantics to implement geospatial information interoperability. In fact,
netCDF-CF entities can implement most of the ISO 19123 coverage geometries and related metadata
(i.e. ISO 19115). NetCDF-CF data model and encodings are widely used and well supported by the
international Earth Sciences Community (e.g. meteorology, climatology, and ocean Communities).
Both netCDF version 3 and 4 can be used for the dataset encoding; while, CF version 1.5 or 1.6 are
recommended.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 155
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex G
(informative)
Example of a WMS 1.3 GetCapabilities response with INSPIRE
extended capabilities & AC-MF layer identification

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>


<WMS_Capabilities xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/wms"
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:inspire_common="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/common/1.0"
xmlns:inspire_vs="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/inspire_vs/1.0"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/inspire_vs/1.0
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/inspire_vs/1.0/inspire_vs.xsd
http://www.opengis.net/wms
http://schemas.opengis.net/wms/1.3.0/capabilities_1_3_0.xsd">
<Service>
<Name>WMS</Name>
<Title>An example of an INSPIRE AC-MF compliant View Service implemented using
the OGC WMS 1.3</Title>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://example-view-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WMS&amp;VERSION=1.3.0"/>
</Service>
<Capability>
<Request>
<GetCapabilities>
<Format>application/xml</Format>
<DCPType>
<HTTP>
<Get>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://view-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WMS&amp;VERSION=1.3.0&amp;REQUEST=GetCapabilities"/>
</Get>
</HTTP>
</DCPType>
</GetCapabilities>
<GetMap>
<Format>image/png</Format>
<Format>image/jpeg</Format>
<DCPType>
<HTTP>
<Get>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://view-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WMS&amp;VERSION=1.3.0&amp;REQUEST=GetMap"/>
</Get>
</HTTP>
</DCPType>
</GetMap>
</Request>
<Exception>
<Format>XML</Format>
</Exception>

<!-- INSPIRE Extended Capabilities as defined in the


"Technical Guidance for the implementation of INSPIRE View Services"
-->
<inspire_vs:ExtendedCapabilities>
<inspire_common:ResourceLocator>
<inspire_common:URL></inspire_common:URL>
</inspire_common:ResourceLocator>
<inspire_common:ResourceType>service</inspire_common:ResourceType>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 156
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<inspire_common:TemporalReference></inspire_common:TemporalReference>
<inspire_common:Conformity>
<inspire_common:Specification>
<inspire_common:Title>D2.8.III.13-14 Data Specification on Atmospheric
Conditions – Guidelines</inspire_common:Title>
<inspire_common:DateOfPublication>2012-04-
20</inspire_common:DateOfPublication>
</inspire_common:Specification>
<inspire_common:Degree>conformant</inspire_common:Degree>
</inspire_common:Conformity>
<inspire_common:MetadataPointOfContact>
<inspire_common:OrganisationName>ACME</inspire_common:OrganisationName>
<inspire_common:EmailAddress>[email protected]</inspire_common:EmailAddress>
</inspire_common:MetadataPointOfContact>
<inspire_common:MetadataDate>2015-01-01</inspire_common:MetadataDate>

<inspire_common:SpatialDataServiceType>view</inspire_common:SpatialDataServiceType>
<inspire_common:MandatoryKeyword>

<inspire_common:KeywordValue>infoMapAccessService</inspire_common:KeywordValue>
</inspire_common:MandatoryKeyword>
<inspire_common:Keyword>
<inspire_common:OriginatingControlledVocabulary>
<inspire_common:Title>AC-MF Data Type</inspire_common:Title>
<inspire_common:DateOfCreation>2012-04-20</inspire_common:DateOfCreation>
<inspire_common:URI>urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-
MF:dataType</inspire_common:URI>
<inspire_common:ResourceLocator>
<inspire_common:URL></inspire_common:URL>
</inspire_common:ResourceLocator>
</inspire_common:OriginatingControlledVocabulary>
<inspire_common:KeywordValue>prediction</inspire_common:KeywordValue>
</inspire_common:Keyword>
<inspire_common:SupportedLanguages>
<inspire_common:DefaultLanguage>
<inspire_common:Language>eng</inspire_common:Language>
</inspire_common:DefaultLanguage>
<inspire_common:SupportedLanguage>
<inspire_common:Language>fin</inspire_common:Language>
</inspire_common:SupportedLanguage>
<inspire_common:SupportedLanguage>
<inspire_common:Language>swe</inspire_common:Language>
</inspire_common:SupportedLanguage>
</inspire_common:SupportedLanguages>
<inspire_common:ResponseLanguage>
<inspire_common:Language>eng</inspire_common:Language>
</inspire_common:ResponseLanguage>
</inspire_vs:ExtendedCapabilities>

<Layer>
<!-- This is a grouping layer containing common inherited properties for
all sub-layers. No "Name" element defined -->
<Title>Latest ECMWF Deterministic Model Run</Title>

<!-- Whether the data is predicted (forecast) or measured, provided here


for convenience (no need to resolve the MetaDataURL or FeatureListURL
to find this out). -->
<KeywordList>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-
MF:dataType">prediction</Keyword>
<!-- <Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-
MF:dataType">measurement</Keyword> -->
</KeywordList>

<!-- Supported Coordinate Reference Systems for this layer and child
layers -->
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 157
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<!-- ETRS89: -->


<CRS>EPSG:4258</CRS>

<!-- WGS 84, latitude, longitude: -->


<CRS>EPSG:4326</CRS>

<!-- WGS 84, longitude, latitude: -->


<CRS>CRS:84</CRS>

<EX_GeographicBoundingBox>
<westBoundLongitude>-31.2</westBoundLongitude>
<eastBoundLongitude>69.1</eastBoundLongitude>
<southBoundLatitude>27.2</southBoundLatitude>
<northBoundLatitude>90</northBoundLatitude>
</EX_GeographicBoundingBox>

<BoundingBox CRS="EPSG:4326" minx="27.2" miny="-31.2" maxx="90" maxy="69.1"/>

<!-- Two analysis times (one for each forecast model run available) -->
<Dimension name="ANALYSIS_TIME" units="ISO8601" default="2012-04-
19T00:00.00Z">
2012-04-19T00:00.00Z,
2012-04-19T03:00.00Z
</Dimension>

<!-- (Forecast) times:


1h resolution for the first day,
3 hour resolution for the next day,
the rest with 6h resolution
-->
<!-- Problem?: this time resolution has to be same for all "ANALYSIS_TIME"
sampling dimensions -->
<Dimension name="TIME" units="ISO8601" default="2012-04-20T12:00.00Z">
2012-04-19T00:00.00Z/2010-04-19T23:00.00Z/PT1H,
2012-04-20T00:00.00Z/2012-04-20T21:00.00Z/PT3H,
2012-04-21T00:00.00Z/2012-04-27T12:00.00Z/PT6H
</Dimension>

<!-- Available elevations, in meters above the WGS84 ellipsoid.


Problem: how to use a barometric vertical CRS? -->
<Dimension name="ELEVATION" units="EPSG:5030" unitSymbol="m" default="0">
0,10,25,50,100,150,200,500,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,10000,12000,15000
</Dimension>

<!-- An isoline style available for all sub-layers -->


<Style>
<Name>isoline</Name>
<Title>Default isoline visualization</Title>
<StyleURL>
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=54
574656&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
</StyleURL>
</Style>

<!-- Filled contour style available for all sub-layers -->


<Style>
<Name>filled-contour</Name>
<Title>Default filled contour visualization</Title>
<StyleURL>
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=89
458843&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 158
and Meteorological Geographical Features

</StyleURL>
</Style>

<!-- An air pressure layer -->


<Layer>
<!-- Layer name, not restricted to the INSPIRE Harmonized naming
convention -->
<Name>AirPressureOrAnythingYouWantToCallIt</Name>
<Title>Air Pressure</Title>

<!-- The visualized property (air pressure) is identified by using


external standard names.
How to declare these vocabularies? The clients just need to
recognize these names? -->
<KeywordList>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-name:WMO:GRIB-code:2010">001</Keyword>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:observable-
property-name:cf-standard-name:1.6">air_temperature</Keyword>
</KeywordList>

<!-- Pointer to the INSPIRE Discovery Service, providing metadata for


the underlying data of this layer, refers to a dataset level ISO
metadata record. This element is required by the INSPIRE View
Services Technical Guidance -->
<MetadataURL type="ISO19115:2003">
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=23
234538&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
</MetadataURL>

<!-- Pointer to the INSPIRE Download Service providing the underlying


coverage data (OM_Observation result) for this layer -->
<DataURL>
<Format>application/x-CF-NetCDF</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://coverage-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WCS&amp;VERSION=2.0&amp;REQUEST=GetCoverage&amp;COVERAGEI
D=4883995&amp;format=application/x-CF-NetCDF"/>
</DataURL>

<!-- Pointer to the INSPIRE Download Service providing the


CSMLObservation instance, the result (coverage) of which this layer
represents. -->
<FeatureListURL>
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://download-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WFS&amp;VERSION=2.0.0&amp;REQUEST=GetFeature&amp;STOREDQU
ERY_ID=urn:ogc:def:query:OGC-
WFS::GetFeatureById&amp;ID=2329873972&amp;outputFormat=application/gml+xml;version=
3.2"/>
</FeatureListURL>
</Layer>

<!-- An air temperature layer -->


<Layer>
<Name>AirTemperatureOrAnythingYouWantToCallIt</Name>
<Title>Air Temperature</Title>
<KeywordList>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:property-
names:wmo-codes:GRIB:2010">011</Keyword>
<Keyword vocabulary="urn:x-inspire:specification:DS-AC-MF:property-
names:cf-standard-names:1.6">air_temperature</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
<MetadataURL type="ISO-19115:2003">
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 159
and Meteorological Geographical Features

<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://discovery-


service.some.org/?SERVICE=CSW&amp;VERSION=2.0.2&amp;REQUEST=GetRecordById&amp;ID=95
558944&amp;outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd&amp;elementSetName=full"/>
</MetadataURL>
<DataURL>
<Format>application/x-CF-NetCDF</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://download-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WCS&amp;VERSION=2.0&amp;REQUEST=GetCoverage&amp;COVERAGEI
D=4883995&amp;format=application/x-CF-NetCDF"/>
</DataURL>
<FeatureListURL>
<Format>application/gml+xml; version=3.2</Format>
<OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://download-
service.some.org/?SERVICE=WFS&amp;VERSION=2.0.0&amp;REQUEST=GetFeature&amp;STOREDQU
ERY_ID=urn:ogc:def:query:OGC-
WFS::GetFeatureById&amp;ID=48873784&amp;outputFormat=application/gml+xml;version=3.
2"/>
</FeatureListURL>
</Layer>
</Layer>
</Capability>
</WMS_Capabilities>
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 160
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex H
(informative)
Reasoning for Inclusion and Exclusion of Meteorological Satellite
Data and Imagery Within Specific INSPIRE Themes

This annex on access to meteorological satellite data is intended to explain its:


1. Exclusion from the scope of Orthoimagery (OI);
2. Inclusion within the scope of Atmospheric Conditions/Meteorological Geographical Features
(AC-MF) and Oceanographic Geographical Feature (OF) (ideally within a joint AC-MF & OF
model).

There are around 30 meteorological satellites in orbit wholly or partly gathering and disseminating
environmental data. The operators include EUMETSAT, ESA, US (NASA, NOAA and DoD), Russia,
China, Japan, India. These satellites gather data from which information on the physical
characteristics of the atmosphere and the oceans can be derived. These characteristics include:
surface and upper air temperatures; upper air humidities and water vapour; cloud amounts, cloud type
and cloud top temperatures; inferred rainfall rates; winds aloft; water waves and winds on the sea
surface.

None of these parameters can be taken directly from the satellite images without extensive processing
involving many other sources of data.
1. Temperatures, and the heights at which the temperatures apply, have to be computed from
radiances used iteratively within a numerical weather prediction model.
2. Precipitation rates are inferred from overlaps with radar rainfall information and extension
outside the radar coverage area.
3. Winds aloft are estimated by tracking the movement of clouds, using estimates of the cloud
height from NWP models.
4. Sea surface temperatures are estimated from cloud-free radiances at the surface, processed
through a numerical model analysis scheme which uses a recent past analysis for continuity,
and current observed temperatures from ships and buoys.
5. Sea wave heights and sea surface winds are estimated from radar Bragg scattering from
capillary waves, with numerical models used to remove gross ambiguities in wind direction.
6. Sea ice cover estimates are generated by an analysis process, which combines satellite
imagery data from several sources and numerical model data.

It is clear that these products derived from meteorological satellite data are measures of atmospheric
or oceanographic properties, which should be treated on a par with other such property estimates, and
falling firmly within the scope of AC-MF and OF. As such they are out of scope of OI.

Satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) coverages are a good example; obviously important
as oceanographic data, SSTs have an even more critical value as boundary information for
atmospheric numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Real-time SST analyses are produced and
distributed by organisations in this community who often combine Atmospheric and Oceanographic
functions. The Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF) data specification identifies satellite-derived
SSTs as required data for Marine Strategy Framework Directive, but wrongly attributed it to the OI
scope.
This leaves the orthorectified images to be considered whether they are in or out-of scope for OI
requirements for the atmospheric and oceanographic components of GMES, for example.

Considering the unprocessed satellite imagery, the visible, infrared (IR) and microwave data are being
used to provide information about the atmosphere (e.g. presence of cloud) or the near-surface
characteristics (e.g. fog or snow cover), and not specifically of the earth‘s surface. The scope of OI
involves image information about the earth‘s surface, and so these unprocessed images can also be
considered out of scope.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 161
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Even if the meteorological visible images are considered from the perspective of providing information
about the surface, they are still a poor fit for the scope of OI. Generally at typical meteorological
satellite resolutions, the surface detail (less than 1km) which interests the ‗OI community‘ is just not
available

The visible images which come from EUMETSAT geostationary satellites (with one visible and 11
other images every 15 minutes) typically have 1km to 5km resolution. They may be combined (e.g.
false colour images combine visible and two IR bands) or cut into tiles for distribution (the field-of-view
is of the globe in fixed perspective). Polar Orbiter (sun synchronous) images are collected at a
receiving station from line-of-sight satellite passes approximately once per hour. These have a typical
1km resolution, and although they are mosaiced in real time, the information about banding and
seamlines is not retained or distributed with the mosaics. OI concerns of seamlines, quality
commission, and high positional accuracy (typically to one pixel ~ 1km) are not of great interest to the
meteorological satellite user community. With the very high frequency and regularity of production of
these satellite images, all lineage information, radiance and processing information would be
referenced to the web-site of the producers, rather than loaded on the metadata. Thus the visible
images from Meteorological Satellites are correctly deemed out of scope of TWG OI.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 162
and Meteorological Geographical Features

Annex I
(informative)
Code list interoperability

Code list interoperability is non-trivial. A large number of international and national code lists exist for
meteorological and atmospheric data. Notable examples include the BUFR B-table issued by WMO,
CF standard names, and AQS parameters.
Whilst all of these code lists allow the user to identify the physical base phenomenon (1*), their entries
may also specify additional aspects. However, there is no common agreement of what these additional
aspects should be. For instance, some code lists specify a generic surface density whereas other
code lists include precipitation per square metre. Here, one code list defines both the substance and
unit of measure, whereas the other simply defines the physical base phenomenon). Beyond
substance, unit, and sometimes altitude many other less obvious aspects are also used (e.g. reporting
precision for temperature codes in BUFR).
The follow examples of aspects illustrate the broad variation of detail and content in existing code lists
(derived from several international and national code lists including WMO BUFR B-table).
 Substance: soil temperature, air temperature, water temperature.
 Elevation: 2 metre temperature, temperature at ground level, upper air temperature)
 Unit: Celsius temperature, Kelvin temperature
 Precision of reporting : temperature with one decimal place, temperature with two decimal
places
 Method-aspect: direct measurement of temperature, forecast temperature
 Quality control aspect: temperature without QC (QC0), temperature after human QC
 Source: temperature from GTS, temperature from forecast model
 Usage: Climatological temperatures, temperatures suitable for realtime production.
 Statistics: Average temperature, maximum temperature
 Accumulation time periods: 12-12 precipitation, 6-6 precipitation.
 Integration time period: 3 hour maximum of 15 minute averages.
 Instrument for measurement: Heliograph sunshine time, ―Sunfollower‖ sunshine time.
 Method for calculating and interpolating: Kalman filtered temperature
 Corrections: Original measured temperature, corrected temperature
Since each international code lists cover different aspects, the interoperability is a challenge. The
current AC-MF specification recognizes the diversity of external code lists and cannot produce a
universal compatible code list. To facilitate the use of AC-MF data by non-experts (outside the
meteorological institutes), we have proposed a model that separates physical base phenomena from
the details of data acquisition, statistics, etc, which are instead placed in the appropriate sections of
the Observable Property model or the ISO19156 O&M model; for example:
 StatisticMeasure covers: statistics, time periods (accumulations), areas, etc
 Constraint covers: constraining parameters (e.g. where temperature < 0 C) and can indicate
spatial values (e.g. screen, 1.5 m, 500 mb), although this may be part of the resulting
coverage range, as well as any other constraints
 Process covers: method, instrument, source
 Metadata & Quality covers: source, provenance and quality measures

By defining a simple model where the base phenomenon is clearly identified, we enable users to
decide where it is appropriate to compare different datasets. For certain usage, it may be appropriate
to compare data from ―hourly average of digitally measured air temperature‖ with ―forecast
temperature at 2 metre‖. Yet again, for other purposes these data may not be compatible. The
decision lies with the user of the data.

Note (1): Within the meteorological domain the most common physical phenomena include:
thermodynamic temperature, pressure, substance amount, intensity of luminosity, speed, pressure,
mass, time, current, surface density, specific energy, energy surface density, mass concentration. All
of those can be found in any basic text book of physics.
INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.III.13-14_v3.0
TWG-AC-MF Data Specification on Atmospheric Conditions 2013-12-10 Page 163
and Meteorological Geographical Features

See also: Root definitions of quantities in http://dx.doi.org/10.3247/SL1Phys06.004.

You might also like