Fabrication & Testing of FRP Material Using Glass Fiber and Chicken Feather
Fabrication & Testing of FRP Material Using Glass Fiber and Chicken Feather
PROJECT (21MEP76)
On
CERTIFICATE
This is certified that the project work entitled “FABRICATION & TESTING OF
FRP MATERIAL USING GLASS FIBER AND CHICKEN FEATHER” is a bonafide
work carried out by CHANDAN S (1SP22ME401), GAGANDEV K N (1SP22ME402),
HARSHIT SINGH J (1SP22ME403), YATHISH K (1SP22ME414), in partial
fulfilment of requirements for the award of BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING in
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING of the Visvesvaraya technological university,
Belagavi during the year 2024. The report has been approved as it satisfied the academic
requirements with respect to project work prescribed by the VTU.
Date:
Place: BANGALORE
ABSTRACT
Now-a-days, the natural fibres from renewable natural resources provide the ability
to act as reinforcing polymers that differ from the use of glass, carbon and other man-made
fibres. Among various fibres, jute is most widely used natural fibre due to its advantages
like easy availability, low density, low production cost and satisfactory mechanical
properties. For the composite material, its mechanical performance depends on many
factors such as fibre content, shape, type, length etc. This research project was conducted
to study the effect of fibre loading and adaptation to the physical and mechanical behaviour
of jute / glass fibre reinforced epoxy-based hybrid. A hybrid compound is a combination
of two or more types of fibre in which one type of fibre measures the deficiency of another
fibre. The feathers of the chicken feathers (CFFs) have potential uses in a low-weight
combination. We investigated the physical properties of epoxy polymer compounds
reinforced with CFF and glass fibres. CFF or hybrid fibre (glass fibre and CFFs) combined
reduce the size by 30 to 40 percent compared to reinforced glass compounds. The CFF
composites has a storage modulus of about 3.5 GPa and a flexural strength of about 50 to
80 MPa. The hybrid fibre composite has better mechanical properties than CFF composites
while having increased bio-based content. Composites of various compositions with three
different fibre percentages are fabricated using simple hand lay-up technique. It has been
observed that there is a significant effect of fibre loading and orientation on the performance
of chicken feather reinforced epoxy-based composites. The developed composites undergo
different kinds of tests. The result shows the construction of a hybrid with good strength
and durability compared to the natural compounds combine
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Before introducing our project work, we would like to thank you the people without
whom the success of this project would have been only a dream.
We express our deep sense of gratitude and indebtedness to Mr. Ramesh Bujari
sir, Associate professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, for his valuable guidance,
continuous assistance and critical appraisal of the project.
We express our sincere thanks to Dr Suresh P Yadav sir, professor and HOD,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, for providing the facilities required for the
completion of this project.
It is with great pleasure, we extend our gratitude and thanks to Dr. Venkata
Narayana sir, Principal, S.E.A. COLLEGE OG ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY,
for his encouragement throughout the project.
We also thank all our friends whole heartedly who have rendered their help,
motivation and support to accomplish this report.
CHANDAN S 1SP22ME401
GAGANDEV K N 1SP22ME402
HARSHIT SINGH J 1SP22ME403
YATHISH K 1SP22ME414
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................... II
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1
5.3.1 Applications................................................................................................... 11
6. TEST RESULTS................................................................................................................. 16
COSTING ......................................................................................................................... 25
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................. 26
BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................... 27
List of Figures
Figure 1: Major polymer matrix composite fabrication processes...................................... 2
Figure 2: Hand-layup method .............................................................................................. 7
Figure 3: Classification and physical properties of various glass fibres. ............................ 10
Figure 4: Collected chicken feather ................................................................................... 12
Figure 5: Washing and cleaning chicken feathers ............................................................. 12
Figure 6: Chicken feather drying. ....................................................................................... 12
Figure 7: Grinded chicken feathers .................................................................................... 13
Figure 8: Grinded chicken feather with cotton like texture .............................................. 13
Figure 9: Glass fiber sheet.................................................................................................. 13
Figure 10: First layer of glass fiber ..................................................................................... 14
Figure 11: Compressing the first layer and removing the air bubbles. ............................. 14
Figure 12: Chicken feather laminate layer.. ....................................................................... 10
Figure 13: Conduting tensile test ....................................................................................... 17
Figure 14: Conducting flexural test. ................................................................................... 20
Figure 15: Conducting shore ‘D’ test.. ............................................................................... 23
Figure 16: Shore hardness scale… ...................................................................................... 24
List of Tables
Table 1: Tensile test data ................................................................................................... 18
Table 2: Flecural test data .................................................................................................. 21
Table 3: Shore ‘D’ hardness test data. ............................................................................... 24
Table 4: Cost of the work. .................................................................................................. 25
List of Graphs
Graph 1: Tensile test graph ................................................................................................ 18
Graph 2: Flecural test graph .............................................................................................. 21
FABRICATION & TESTING OF FRP MATERIAL USING GLASSFIBER & CHICKEN FEATHER
CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION
Mankind has been aware of composite materials since several hundred years before
Christ and applied innovation to improve the quality of life. Although it is not clear that
how man understood the fact that mud bricks made sturdier houses if lined with straw, he
used them to make buildings that lasted. The ancient Pharaohs made their slaves use bricks
and mortar to strengthen the structure of their buildings, some of which testify to the
wisdom of a dead civilization even today. Modern architecture stems from research and
innovation from the last few decades evolving from the glass of automotive bodies to
integrate space combinations with other applications. Ironically, although the increasing
familiarity of integrated objects and the growing range of applications, the term carries a
clear definition. Loose terms like materials composed of two or more distinctly identifiable
constituents are used to describe natural composites like timber, organic materials, like
tissue surrounding the skeletal system, soil aggregates, minerals and rock. Composites that
form heterogeneous structures which meet the requirements of specific design and function,
imbued with desired properties which limit the scope for classification. Reinforcing
materials generally withstand maximum load and serve the desirable properties. Further,
though composite types are often distinguishable from one another, no clear determination
can be really made. The demands on matrices are many. They may need to temperature
variations, be conductors or resistors of electricity, have moisture sensitivity etc. This may
offer weight advantages, ease of handling and other merits which may also become
applicable depending on the purpose for which matrices are chosen. Solids that
accommodate stress to incorporate other constituents provide strong bonds for the
reinforcing phase are potential matrix materials.
The reinforcing phase provides the strength and stiffness. In most cases, the reinforcement
is harder, stronger, and stiffer than the matrix.
The major processing routes for polymer matrix composites are shown in Fig. 1.3.
Two types of polymer matrices are shown: thermosets and thermoplastics. A thermoset
starts as a low-viscosity resin that reacts and cures during processing, forming an intractable
solid. A thermoplastic is a high-viscosity resin that is processed by heating it above its
melting temperature. Because a thermoset resin sets up and cures during processing, it
cannot be reprocessed by reheating. By comparison, a thermoplastic can be reheated above
its melting temperature for additional processing. There are processes for both classes of
resins that are more amenable to discontinuous fibres and others that are more amenable to
continuous fibres. In general, because metal and ceramic matrix composites require very
high temperatures and sometimes high pressures for processing, they are normally much
more expensive than polymer matrix composites. However, they have much better thermal
stability, a requirement in applications where the composite is exposed to high temperatures.
This book will deal with both continuous and discontinuous polymer, metal, and ceramic
matrix composites, with an emphasis on continuous fibre, high-performance polymer
composites.
1.2 Applications:
Applications include aerospace, transportation, construction, marine goods,
sporting goods, and more recently infrastructure, with construction and transportation being
the largest. In general, high-performance but more costly continuous-carbon-fibre
composites are used where high strength and stiffness along with light weight are required,
and much lower-cost fibreglass composites are used in less demanding applications where
weight is not as critical.
CHAPTER - 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
Dinesh and Jagdish et. al. research focused on wear study of sisal fibre reinforced
epoxy based composite materials. LY-556 and HY 951 used as resin and hardener
respectively. 10%, 20%, and 30% sisal fibre used as reinforcement during fabrication of
composite by had lay-up method. By increasing the percentage of the sisal fibre in
fabrication work enhance the weight loss of the specimen of wear test. SFRECM can be
used as substitute materials for human Orthopaedic Implants.
CHAPTER - 3
OBJECTIVES OF THE WORK
1. The present study concentrates on the development of natural composite and to utilize
the advantages offered by renewable sources.
2. Composites are developed by hand layup technique using chicken feather and glass
fibre, epoxy and hardener. Specimens are cut according to the ASTM standard.
3. The hybrid composites are developed with different reinforcements of percentages of
chicken feather.
4. The various tests are conducted to determine the mechanical properties.
CHAPTER - 4
METHODOLOGY ADOPTED
The laying on of hands is an easy way to process integrated. The infrastructure
requirements for this route are also small. The steps to process are simple. First, the
extruded gel is sprayed on the surface of the mold to avoid polymer adhesion on the surface.
Reinforcement in the form of woven mats or carpets of carved fibre is determined by the
size of the mold and placed on the surface of the mold. Then thermosetting polymer in
liquid form is mixed thoroughly in suitable proportion with a prescribed hardener (curing
agent) and poured onto the surface of mat already placed in the mold. The polymer is
uniformly spread with the help of brush. Second layer of mat is then placed on the polymer
surface and a roller is moved with a mild pressure on the mat polymer layer to remove any
air trapped as well as the excess polymer present. The process is repeated for each layer of
polymer and mat, till the required layers are stacked. After placing the last layer, release
gel is sprayed on the inner surface of the top mould plate which is then kept on the stacked
layers and the pressure is applied. After curing in the room temperature or heat, moulds are
opened and the built-in part is removed and processed. The laying on of hands is shown in
Figure 1. The treatment time depends on the type of polymer used for composite processing.
For example, with an epoxy-based system, the typical cooling time in a room temperature
is 24-48 hours.
CHAPTER – 5
MATERIALS AND FABRICATION OF COMPOSITE
5.1. Chicken Feather:
Chicken feathers have unique structure and properties not found in any natural or
synthetic fibres. Although feathers as such cannot be processed as the protein fibres wool
and silk due to the complex structure of the feathers, the secondary structures of feathers
i.e., the barbs have the structure and properties that make them suitable for use as natural
protein fibres. The low density, excellent compressibility and resiliency, ability to dampen
sound, warmth retention and distinctive morphological structure of feather barbs make
them unique fibres. For example, the density of chicken feathers is about 0.8 g/cm3
compared to about 1.5 g/cm3 for cellulose fibres and about 1.3 g/cm3 for wool. None of
the natural or synthetic fibres commercially available today have a density as low as that
of chicken feathers. Such unique properties make barbs preferable for many applications
such as textiles and composites. In addition to the unique structure and properties, barbs
are cheap, abundantly available and a renewable source for protein fibres. Therefore,
attempts are being made to use annually renewable lignocellulosic agricultural by-products
such as cornhusks, cornstalks and pineapple leaves as an alternative source for cellulosic
fibres. The secondary structures of the feathers, the barbs are in fibrous form and could be
a potential source as protein fibres. More than 4 billion pounds of chicken feathers are
produced in the world every year. About 50% of the weight of the feathers is barbs and the
other 50% is rachis. Even assuming that 20% of the barbs have lengths greater than 1 inch
required for textile applications, about 400 million pounds of barbs will be available as
natural protein fibres every year. This means an availability of 8% of the protein fibres
consumed in the world every year. Since the two natural protein fibres wool and silk are
relatively expensive fibres, using the low-cost barbs as protein fibres will make many
protein fibre products to be economical and also add high value to the feathers. Current
applications of chicken feathers are mainly in composites and non-woven fabrics. Recently,
several attempts on using the barbs as ‘‘feather fibres’’ for composites and non-woven have
been reported. These feather fibres have been recently characterized for their micro
structural properties. Although several researchers have reported the structure and
properties of feathers from various birds, most of the work has been done on the feather in
its entirety and mostly on the feather rachis.
5.3.1 Application:
⚫ Electronics: GRP has been widely used for circuit board manufacture (PCB’s), TVs,
radios, computers, cell phones, electrical motor covers etc.
⚫ Home and furniture: Roof sheets, bathtub furniture, windows, sun shade, show racks,
book racks, tea tables, spa tubs etc.
⚫ Aviation and aerospace: GRP have been extensively used in aviation and aerospace
though it is not widely used for primary airframe construction, as there are alternative
materials which better suit the applications. Typical GRP applications are engine
cowlings, luggage racks, instrument enclosures, bulkheads, ducting, storage bins and
antenna enclosures. It is also widely used in ground-handling equipment.
⚫ Boats and marine: Its properties are ideally suited to boat construction. Although
there were problems with water absorption, the modern resins are more resilient and
they are used to make the simple type of boats. In fact, GRP is lower weight materials
compared to other materials like wood and metals.
⚫ Medical: Because of its low porosity, non-staining and hard-wearing finish, GRP is
widely suited to medical applications. From instrument enclosures to X-ray beds
(where X-ray transparency is important) are made up of GRP.
⚫ Automobiles: GRP has been extensively used for automobile parts like body panels,
seat cover plates, door panels, bumpers and engine cover.
However, GRP has been widely used for replacing the present metal and non-metal
parts in the various applications and tooling costs are relatively low as compared with metal
assemblies.
1. Washing and cleaning: The chicken feathers were collected from the nearest chicken
farm and the feathers collected were washed and cleaned multiple times to remove dust
and bad odder in them.
Figure 4: Collected chicken feathers. Figure 5: Washing and cleaning chicken feathers.
2. Dry: The washed and cleaned chicken feathers spread on a plastic sheet and were
placed under direct sun light for several days to completely dry them for the next
process.
3. Grinding: Now the completely dried chicken feathers are collected and grinded and
at the end the feathers attain cotton like texture with small fibres.
Figure 7: Grinded chicken feathers Figure 8: Grinded chicken feathers with cotton
like texture.
4. Mould assembly: The mould for the composite preparation is made using glass plate
and double-sided tape.
5. Next a mould release wax is applied on to the glass surface before pouring the epoxy
so that the finished composite can easily remove once hardened.
6. The glass fibre/mat required for the lay-up process is cut to the dimension of the
composite to be prepared by means of templates, paper patterns or by approximate
measurements taken.
7. The first resin coat is poured on to the glass plate inside the mould and spread evenly
by a brush.
8. The first layer of fibre mat is placed over the resin coating inside the mould and Care
must be taken to ensure an even coverage of resin, free from air bubbles.
9. Immediately after the first layer of fibre has been applied a compression roller is used
to compress the mat and squeeze air bubbles and excess resin from the laminate. This
technique appreciably improves the strength of the moulding by increasing its density
and reducing its porosity on the inside surface, so it is important that the roller is used
firmly and evenly across the entire surface.
Figure 11: Compressing the first layer and removing the air bubbles.
10. After a layer of fibre next grinded chicken feathers are placed evenly on the fibre mat
and resin is applied over it.
11. Successive layers of laminate are now applied to the mould until the lay-up is complete.
Each layer is compression rolled as described above.
12. Using this method five layer of laminate is prepare, i.e., four layer of glass fibre and
three-layer chicken feathers.
13. After the last resin coat has been applied, the composition is covered with another
removable glass sheet. The mould is closed by placing a glass sheet which is exactly
the shape and size of the mould and weight on top of the glass.
15. The composite is let to cure for about 48 hours with the weights placed on top.
CHAPTER - 6
TEST RESULTS
Composite materials are a class of materials that consist of two or more components
that are combined to form a new material with enhanced properties. The components of a
composite material can be of different types such as fibers, particles, and matrices. The use
of composites has become increasingly popular in various fields due to their unique
properties such as high strength, stiffness, low weight, and corrosion resistance. One of the
challenges in using composites is finding an economical and sustainable source for the
reinforcement material. Chicken feathers are one such waste product that is generated in
large quantities by the poultry industry and can be a potential source for the development
of new composite materials. In this study, we prepared a composite material using epoxy
resin, chicken feathers, and glass fiber mesh. Epoxy resins are widely used in composite
materials due to their excellent mechanical properties, adhesion, and low shrinkage. Glass
fibers are used as a reinforcement material due to their high strength, stiffness, and
resistance to corrosion. The use of chicken feathers in composite materials is a relatively
new concept that has gained attention in recent years due to their low cost, renewable nature,
and biodegradability. In this report, we present the results of the mechanical properties tests,
including tensile, compression, flexural, and Shore D hardness tests, conducted on the
composite material to understand its performance and suitability for various applications.
The outcomes of this study have important implications for the development of sustainable
composite materials and for the efficient utilization of waste products.
2. Flexural test
Initial dimensions:
Length = 250 mm
Width = 27 mm
Gauge length = 50 mm
Gauge width = 12.45 mm
Section length = 80 mm
Area = 95.118 mm²
Numerical results
SL. NO DISPLACEMENT LOAD SL. NO DISPLACEMENT LOAD
1 0 0.15 10 3.07 1
2 0.45 0.25 11 3.66 1.2
3 0.72 0.14 12 4.25 1.4
4 1.3 0.15 13 4.84 1.6
5 2.4 0.19 14 5.43 1.74
6 3.2 0.23 15 6.02 0.07
7 3.62 0.4 16 6.61 0.05
8 4.13 0.6 17 7.2 0.07
9 4.65 0.8
Table 1: Tensile test data
LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT
2
1.74
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
LOAD IN KN
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4 0.25 0.23
0.15 0.14 0.15 0.19
0.2 0.07 0.05 0.07
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
DISPLACEMENT IN MM
Final dimensions:
Final gauge length = 51.1 mm
From test:
Maximum force = 1.740 KN
Yield load = 1.62 KN
Calculation:
𝑷𝒎𝒂𝒙
1. Tensile Strength = 𝝈𝒎𝒂𝒙 = - equation 1
𝑨𝒐
1.74 × 103
𝝈𝒎𝒂𝒙 = = 𝟏𝟖. 𝟐𝟗 𝑵⁄
95.118 𝒎𝒎²
𝒚𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝒍𝒐𝒂𝒅
2. Yield stress = 𝝈𝒔 = - equation 2
𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒂
Yield load in KN
𝐴0 = Area in mm²
1.62 × 103
𝝈𝒔 = = 𝟏𝟕. 𝟎𝟑 𝑵/𝒎𝒎𝟐
95.118
∆𝑳−𝑳
3. % Of elongation = - equation 3
𝑳
𝛥𝐿 = final length in mm
𝐿 = Initial length in mm
51.1− 50
% Of elongation = × 100 = 2.20%
50
Initial dimensions:
Length = 100 mm
Depth = 7.6 mm
Width = 30 mm
Numerical results
SL. NO DISPLACEMENT LOAD SL. NO DISPLACEMENT LOAD
1 0.1 0.14 10 3.7 0.43
2 0.5 0.17 11 4.1 0.48
3 0.9 0.21 12 4.5 0.5
4 1.3 0.24 13 4.7 0.51
5 1.7 0.27 14 5.1 0.52
6 2.1 0.3 15 5.2 0.53
7 2.5 0.34 16 6 0.05
8 2.9 0.37 17 7.5 0.06
9 3.3 0.4 18 9.3 0.09
Table 2: Flexural test data
LOAD VS DISPLACEMENT
0.6
0.52 0.53
0.5 0.51
0.48
0.5
0.43
0.4
0.4 0.37
0.34
LOAD IN KN
0.3
0.3 0.27
0.24
0.21
0.2 0.17
0.14
0.09
0.1 0.05 0.06
0
0.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.7 5.1 5.2 6 7.5 9.3
DISPLACEMENT IN MM
From test:
Maximum force =0.530 KN
Calculations:
𝟑𝑭𝑳
1. Flexural strength = 𝝈 = - equation 4
𝟐𝑩𝑫𝟐
F = maximum force in KN
L = length in MM
B = width in MM
D = depth in MM
3×0.516×100
𝝈= = 44.69 N/mm²
2×30×7.62
Numerical results
COSTING
SL.NO PARTICULARS PRICE
1 Glass Fibre ₹1,300
3 Tests ₹4,500
4 Miscellaneous ₹3,500
Total ₹12,400
CONCLUSION
According to the findings, it can be concluded that CFF has great value and a wide
range of development and is achieved through advanced research in the field of high-quality
integrated materials. All structures, their structure and effect can be easily tested. Further
research into CFF-based integration can be easily done by conveying the above information.
Different combinations can be made with CFF such as Matrix, Particulate or Fibre and the
integration of all forms can be added by various percentages to design hybrid combinations.
Highly improved and hybrid materials can be designed through modification in the
existence material and property enhancement can be done. Further scope in the bio
composite design is the use of CFF in hybrid composite manufacturing. CFF has good
fibrous nature, its morphological results relate to the unit-form dispersion. If fibre
orientation is made systematic instead of random and sizing is manipulated also if the
mixing technique of fibre with matrix during casting is improved, then an enhanced
characterization of developed composite can be achieved with much cost-effective
applications.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]. Gupta, K.M (2006) Material Science, Second Edition, Umesh Publications.
[2]. Bhattacharyya, D., Subasinghe, A., & Kim, N. K. (2015). Natural fibres: Their
composites and flammability characterizations. Multi-functionality of Polymer
Composites, 1(1), 102-143.
[3]. Dabade.B.M, RamachandraReddy.G, Rajesham.S and UdayaKiran.C, effect of fibre
length and fibre weight ratio on tensile properties of sun hemp and palmyra fibre
reinforced polyester composites, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 2006,
25, 1733-1738.
[4]. Chabba, S., Matthews, G.F., Netravali, A.N., Green composites using cross-linked soy
flour and flax yarns, journal of the royal society of chemistry, 2005, 7, 576- 581.
[5]. Jamal Mirbagheri, Mehdi Tajvidi, John C. Hermanson, Ismaeel Ghasemi, Tensile
Properties of Wood Flour/Kenaf Fibre Polypropylene Hybrid Composites,105, 2007,
3054–3059.
[6]. John, K. and Venkata Naidu, S., Sisal Fibre/Glass Fibre Hybrid Composites: The
Impact and Compressive Properties, 23, 2004, 1253-1258.
[7]. Mukherjee, K.G, Satyanrayana.K. G, Structure and Properties of some vegetable fibres,
Journal of Material Sciences 1984, 19, 3925-3934.