The SEAACT Science Fair Judging document outlines the criteria for evaluating projects across various categories such as Agriculture, Digital Technology, and Sustainability. It includes six dimensions focusing on skills application, presentation, understanding of concepts, societal significance, creativity, and evidence of ownership. Each dimension specifies the expectations for project design, communication, and the depth of research involved.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views1 page
2023-SEAACT-Science-Fair-Rubric-
The SEAACT Science Fair Judging document outlines the criteria for evaluating projects across various categories such as Agriculture, Digital Technology, and Sustainability. It includes six dimensions focusing on skills application, presentation, understanding of concepts, societal significance, creativity, and evidence of ownership. Each dimension specifies the expectations for project design, communication, and the depth of research involved.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
SEAACT Science Fair Judging
Project Number: Title:
Individual Agriculture, Fisheries & Food Early Childhood
Group Curiosity & Ingenuity Special Education Class Project Digital Technology Primary Health and Disease High School Sustainability & Climate Change
Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3
Application of Discipline Specific Presentation / Communication Understanding of concepts, Skills processes, techniques clear and focused purpose logical organisation of material understanding of relevant scientific testable using specific methods clarity of graphics and legends concepts variables and control defined supporting documentation understanding interpretation and well-designed research plan clear, concise descriptions limitations of results and systematic data collection conclusions reproducibility of results Senior - describes how and why Senior - appropriate application of the topic was chosen analytical and statistical methods - writes a conclusion that discusses the key findings of the investigation and addresses the research question, predication and hypothesis
Dimension 4 Dimension 5 Dimension 6
Significance to society or Creativity / innovation Evidence of ownership discipline identifies and explains project demonstrates significant A list of resources, websites, importance of project creativity or innovation in one or reference books or adult support is identifies contribution to field of more of the above dimensions provided to show appropriate level study of research and support for student recognition of potential impact age and year level on field as well as societal and/or economic implications