British-Occupation-in-the-Philippines
British-Occupation-in-the-Philippines
Members:
Camelle Dalida
Almira Lucio
Jeffrey Magbanua
Marnie Narciso
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
One of the lesser-known episodes in Philippine invasion history is the invasion by Great
Britain, which is often not discussed in textbooks or other secondary sources available in schools
and libraries. Beyond the events of the 1700s during Spanish colonization, the Battle of Manila
stands out as a significant occurrence. This major event transpired during the Spanish colonial
era. However, what were the British motives for occupying Manila while it was under Spanish
control?
During the Seven Years' War (1756–1763), Britain sought to weaken Spanish influence
in the Pacific by targeting Manila, the capital of the Spanish colony in the Philippines. In
September 1762, a British fleet led by General William Draper and Admiral Samuel Cornish
captured Manila, initiating a brief period of British control over the northern Philippines (Tracy,
1995).
The Seven Years’ War lasted from 1756-1763 (fighting in the Americas started in 1754
with the French and Indian War, but fighting didn’t begin in Europe until 1756). The conflict
between the great European powers spanned the globe, making it the first true world war. During
this time, the Philippines was a wealthy Spanish colony made famous by its grandeur and the
Manila Galleon Trade. Eager to take a piece of this wealth, Britain planned an invasion of
Manila with four store ships, three frigates, eight ships of the line, and 10,300 men.
But first, why did the Britain chose Manila even if it’s under Spanish Control? Manila
played an important role in eighteenth-century global trade. It was on the western edge of the
Spanish trade across the Pacific, part of southern Chinese trading networks across the South
China Sea, and on the easternmost limb of British networks in the Indian Ocean. For the Spanish,
Manila was a crucial node in the galleon trade linking Spain and the Americas with China across
the Pacific. At Manila, American silver was exchanged for luxury goods from China, which were
The plan to occupy Manila was in part a continuation of the East India Company's China
trade. Manila was on the eastern periphery of its Indian Ocean trade, and a crucial source of
silver, valued in Canton unlike British and Indian goods. Though technically barred from trading
in Manila, British merchants regularly circumvented the ban, trading for silver that in Canton
The Company used Manila's occupation as a chance to carry out its intentions for a trade
base after Spain reluctantly joined the French side in the war against Britain. Additionally, the
company aimed to grab silver from the Acapulco galleon that was arriving in Manila in order to
finance investments for the next Canton trading season. Strategically speaking, the Crown saw
Manila as a negotiating chip to be exploited in post-war talks with France and Spain. The British
conquest of Manila was therefore intended to ensure British trade with Canton rather than to
Moreover, the British occupation of Manila lasted from September 1762 until April 1764.
When British forces first arrived, they were challenged by Spanish forces (a mix of soldiers from
New Spain, probably mestizos and criollos, and people native to central Luzon), but the British
took Manila proper more easily than they had anticipated they would (Tracy, 1995). While the
British invasion of Manila in 1762 resulted in immediate aftereffects, it also laid the groundwork
for significant avenues of influence for subsequent generations under Spanish occupation.
Generally, this historical research was conducted to analyze the outcome and the impact
of the British Occupation and the Battle of Manila (1762). Specifically, the objectives of the
Manila during the Seven Years' War, including the geopolitical dynamics between
military strategies, and the socio-economic changes that occurred during the occupation.
This study aims to analyze the British occupation of the Philippines and its impact on
subsequent generations. The findings of this research may provide valuable insights and benefits
to the following:
Historians and Researchers: could benefit from the study as it contributes to a deeper
its political, economic, and cultural effects, this research enriches the broader discourse on
colonial encounters and resistance in Southeast Asia. It also encourages further investigation into
Educators and Students: may find this study useful as it enhances educational materials
on Philippine and global history. By examining the British occupation beyond conventional
narratives, this research encourages critical thinking and a more nuanced understanding of
colonial legacies. It supports the development of a more comprehensive and balanced history
curriculum.
Cultural Advocates and Heritage: Enthusiasts could benefit from the study as it
highlights the cultural and national identity shifts during and after the British occupation. By
exploring how this event shaped Filipino resistance, governance, and historical consciousness,
the study fosters appreciation for the Philippines’ resilience and evolving heritage.
The General Public may gain from this research as it promotes awareness of an often-overlooked
chapter in Philippine history. By examining the British occupation’s impact, the study
encourages greater historical curiosity and understanding of the country’s colonial past. It also
Future Researchers: may use this study as a foundation for further exploration of the
British occupation’s long-term effects. By providing detailed analysis and insights, this research
serves as a valuable reference for those interested in colonial history, international conflicts, and
The British occupation of the Philippines from 1762 to 1764, though brief, is a crucial
episode that has generated substantial scholarly attention due to its political, social, and long-
term impacts on Filipino society. Various historians and scholars have analyzed this period,
focusing on its effects on colonial governance, Filipino resistance, and the eventual formation of
nationalist consciousness.
Although often overshadowed by the longer Spanish colonial period, scholars argue that
this occupation had a profound influence on the socio-political landscape of the islands.
According to Cushner (1971), the British occupation exposed the vulnerabilities of Spanish
colonial rule and provided a glimpse of alternative colonial governance. The British were able to
seize Manila due to Spain's preoccupation with wars in Europe, thereby demonstrating how
Further, Fradera (1999) highlights that the temporary British presence disrupted the
colonial economy and administration, forcing local elites, including the Filipino principalia, to
negotiate and cooperate with a new foreign power. This exposure to a different colonial authority
may have subtly influenced later resistance movements against Spain, as it showcased the
planted the seeds of early Filipino nationalism. The occupation demonstrated that Spain's hold
over the Philippines was not absolute and could be challenged by other imperial powers.
contestation and laid a foundation for subsequent challenges to Spanish hegemony. It also served
as a historical reminder of the Philippines’ strategic importance in global imperial rivalries. The
British occupation of Manila during the Seven Years’ War exposed the vulnerabilities of Spanish
According to Cushner (1971), the ease with which the British seized Manila highlighted
Spain’s military and administrative weaknesses in the region. The occupation disrupted the
Spanish colonial administration, which had long exercised control through the Manila Galleon
Trade and ecclesiastical authorities. Fradera (1999) supports this view by noting that the
occupation forced the Spanish colonial government to temporarily retreat to Pampanga, thereby
creating a political vacuum in the capital. During this period, the British attempted to establish
alliances with local elites and leaders to consolidate their hold, although these efforts were
The presence of a new colonial power also altered the dynamics between Filipinos and
the Spanish. Ocampo (2012) discusses how the British occupation emboldened local leaders such
as Diego Silang in Ilocos to initiate revolts against Spanish colonial authority, taking advantage
of Spain’s weakened position. Silang’s rebellion, although later suppressed, reflects how the
domination. Schumacher (1991) adds that these revolts, although often regional and fragmented,
showed early signs of Filipino resistance that prefigured later nationalist movements.
Additionally, Fradera (1999) emphasizes how the principalia, or Filipino local elites,
navigated the complex political environment by cooperating with both British and Spanish
authorities to protect their own interests, highlighting their role as power brokers during the
occupation. Although the British occupation was short-lived, its impacts reverberated throughout
Philippine colonial society. Cushner (1971) notes that the occupation disrupted trade, particularly
the Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade, which was the backbone of the colonial economy. This
economic disruption exposed the fragility of the Spanish colonial economic system. Phelan
(1959) also argues that Spain’s weakened control during and after the occupation led to reforms
future invasions.
From a broader perspective, Benton (2010) examines how such colonial disruptions
challenged the Spanish legal and administrative structures, creating a historical consciousness
among Filipinos about the impermanence of Spanish rule. Ocampo (2012) reinforces this idea by
arguing that the British occupation, though temporary, planted the early seeds of Filipino
nationalism by demonstrating that colonial rule could be contested and even overthrown.
International Context and Colonial Rivalries The British occupation of Manila cannot be
analyzed in isolation from the broader imperial rivalries of the time. Marley (2008) situates the
occupation within Britain's global strategy to undermine Spanish and French colonial holdings
This view is supported by Anderson (2000), who highlights how European imperial
conflicts played out in Southeast Asia, with the Philippines becoming a pawn in the larger
struggle between colonial empires. Generational Impact and Historical Memory Finally, the
occupation’s influence extends into Filipino historical memory. Mojares (2006) argues that while
this episode is often neglected in mainstream historical narratives, it plays a critical role in
understanding the evolution of Filipino attitudes toward colonial rule. Ileto (1998) adds that the
British occupation serves as an important historical moment that shaped Filipino discourse on
colonial resistance and sovereignty. These reflections suggest that the occupation, though brief,
The British occupation of Manila was part of the larger conflict of the Seven Years' War
(1756–1763), a global battle between Britain and its allies against France and Spain. As Spain
sided with France, Britain sought to weaken Spanish influence by targeting its key colonial
possessions, including Manila (Tracy, 1995). The British invasion fleet, led by General William
Draper and Admiral Samuel Cornish, arrived in the Philippines in September 1762. Within a few
weeks, British forces captured Manila, demonstrating Spain’s vulnerability in the region (Schurz,
1939). The occupation lasted until April 1764, when the Treaty of Paris (1763) required Britain
The British occupation disrupted Spanish colonial rule by exposing its military and
resistance movement in Pampanga, challenging British control (Corpuz, 1989). While the British
held Manila, much of the colony remained under Spanish rule, highlighting Spain’s reliance on
decentralized governance.
The British initially sought to govern Manila using existing Spanish officials and church
leaders. However, resistance from both Spanish loyalists and local Filipinos limited their control
(Diaz-Trechuelo, 1965). According to Phelan (1959), the British struggled to implement their
policies due to the lack of cooperation from local elites and ongoing resistance outside the
capital. The brief occupation revealed weaknesses in Spain’s colonial bureaucracy, leading to
administrative reforms after Manila was returned to Spanish rule (Agoncillo, 1990).
The Philippine economy during Spanish rule depended heavily on the Manila-Acapulco
Galleon Trade, which facilitated commerce between Asia and Spanish America. The British
occupation disrupted this system, as British merchants sought to establish direct trade with China
and India (Francia, 2010). During the occupation, British forces looted Spanish treasuries,
seizing silver and goods meant for the galleon trade. This significantly weakened Spain’s
The British encouraged more open trade with foreign merchants, breaking Spain’s
restrictive economic policies. This exposure to freer trade foreshadowed later economic
liberalization under Spanish rule in the 19th century (Cushner, 1971). Filipino and Chinese
merchants benefited from this temporary shift, as it allowed them to engage in global commerce
Before the British invasion, Spanish rule in the Philippines was largely uncontested.
However, the ease with which British forces captured Manila challenged the perception of
Spanish dominance (Rafael, 2000). This realization contributed to later resistance movements
interactions between Filipinos, British officers, and Indian sepoys (Cullinane, 2003). Many
Indian soldiers who accompanied the British settled in the Philippines, contributing to the
country’s cultural diversity. Although British Protestant missionaries had little time to influence
religious practices, the presence of non-Catholic officials provided Filipinos with alternative
The British occupation served as a precursor to later resistance against Spanish rule.
Simón de Anda’s leadership during the occupation became a model for future revolutionaries,
including those in the Philippine Revolution of 1896 (Agoncillo, 1990). The idea that Spanish
strengthen control over the colony, Spain introduced economic policies that allowed for
increased foreign trade and investment (Legarda, 1999). This shift helped integrate the
Philippines into global trade networks, influencing economic policies even under American rule.
The British occupation of the Philippines was a brief but transformative event in the
country’s history. It exposed the weaknesses of Spanish colonial rule, disrupted economic
systems, and introduced new political and cultural ideas. While Spain eventually regained
control, the lessons learned from the occupation influenced later reforms and resistance