ssrn_id2970521_code572197
ssrn_id2970521_code572197
(Director,
Ecosystem
for
Innovation
and
Entrepreneurship
and
Dean,
Suresh
Gyan
Vihar
University,
Jaipur.
[email protected]
)
ABSTRACT
E-‐governance
is
very
important
for
introducing
greater
effectiveness
and
efficiency
in
government
operations
and
in
government
to
citizen
dealings.
However,
introduction
of
e-‐governance
is
not
an
easy
task.
It
is
not
just
introduction
of
technology,
but
it
also
involves
human
aspects.
This
article
uses
case
studies
to
understand
implementation
of
e-‐governance.
The
case
studies
briefly
describe
change
management
process
in
implementation
of
E-‐Governance
by
the
Government
of
Rajasthan.
The
project
of
RGDPS
and
digitalization
of
Archives
are
discussed
as
case
studies.
The
author
also
discusses
the
factors
for
success
of
these
change
management
initiatives.
Introduction
E-‐Governance
consists
of
a
series
of
initiatives
designed
to
introduce
internet
based
applications,
which
improves
the
efficiency
and
efficacy
of
the
mechanism
through
which
the
citizens
are
able
to
connect
to
the
government
and
it
also
helps
in
improving
inter-‐governmental
and
intra-‐governmental
operations.
The
government
can
connect
to
the
citizen
and
vice
versa
through
these
initiatives.
E-‐Governance
is
an
initiative
to
use
technology
in
establishing
a
framework
for
Government-‐Citizen
interaction
and
communication.
It
is
a
simplified
communication
system
between
government,
citizen
and
other
related
bodies.
E-‐Governance
uses
the
technological
expertise
and
resources
of
the
private
sector
organisations
also
in
an
effort
to
create
the
required
infrastructure
and
support
system
to
enable
proper
governance
and
interactions.
Introduction
of
e-‐governance
is
not
an
easy
task.
It
is
not
just
introduction
of
technology,
but
it
also
involves
human
aspects
and
requires
a
great
deal
of
administrative
and
motivational
skills
to
execute
an
e-‐governance
initiative.
Developing
countries
like
India
are
experiencing
tremendous
improvement
in
their
governance
structure
through
initiatives
like
digitalization
of
documents,
online
submission
of
applications
and
online
submission
of
required
information,
E-‐Kiosks,
E-‐Portals,
online
payment
systems,
Online
Grievance,
(for
example
-‐
Sugam
-‐
a
system
of
grievance
management
in
Rajasthan
in
India)
which
are
broadly
called
It
was
in
1970
that
the
central
government
established
department
of
Electronics
and
subsequently
National
Informatics
Centre
was
established
in
1977.
In
1987
NICNET
(national
satellite
based
information
network)
was
launched,
which
was
followed
by
DISNIC
(District
information
system
of
National
Informatics
Centre).
Thus
the
use
of
technology
was
given
a
big
thrust
through
these
initiatives.
The
ministry
of
Information
Technology
was
started
in
1999
and
a
12
point
action
plan
for
e-‐governance
was
launched
in
2000.
In
2006,
the
government
declared
E-‐Governance
action
plan
to
further
expand
e-‐governance.
Different
state
government
adopted
different
routes
to
e-‐governance.
Andhra
Pradesh
Government
was
the
first
state
government
in
1996
to
introduce
e-‐sewa
–
project
to
help
the
common
people
through
e-‐governance
initiative.
There
used
to
be
long
queues
of
people
waiting
to
deposit
their
payment
for
outstanding
bills
of
electricity,
telephone
and
other
government
departments.
When
people
started
making
payment
through
e-‐government
set
up
(e-‐mitra
and
other
such
systems,
which
allowed
people
to
make
payment
through
the
e-‐governance
arm).
This
was
a
big
relief
to
the
common
masses.
It
was
appreciated
by
media,
general
public
and
experts.
Some
case
studies
were
also
developed
on
these
initiatives
of
the
Government
of
Andhra
Pradesh.
Later
other
governments
started
realizing
the
benefits
of
e-‐governance.
Karnataka
Government
introduced
Bhoomi,
Gujarat
Government
introduced
Mahiti
Shakti,
Haryana
Government
introduced
Nai
Disha,
Himachal
Pradesh
government
introduced
lok-‐mitra,
Maharashtra
Government
introduced
Setu,
Madhya
Pradesh
introduced
Gyandoot
and
Delhi
introduced
Automatic
Tracking
of
Vehicles.
Similarly
other
governments
also
introduced
many
schemes
to
transform
governance.
Soon
e-‐governance
became
popular
and
it
was
introduced
by
almost
all
governments
in
India.
Today
e-‐governance
is
wide-‐spread
and
benefitting
common
masses
by
providing
ease,
comfort
and
convenience.
Large
number
of
citizens
in
Rajasthan
were
experiencing
delays
in
government
departments.
They
were
not
able
to
get
any
solutions
for
the
problem.
They
were
not
able
to
submit
complaints
also.
The
government
of
Rajasthan
introduced
Sugam
-‐
an
online
platform
where
any
person
can
submit
his
/
her
complaints
relating
to
any
government
department.
In
2011,
the
government
of
Rajasthan
also
enacted
RGDPS
Act
(Rajasthan
Guaranteed
Delivery
of
Public
Services).
Under
this
law,
the
concerned
government
department
has
to
deliver
services
to
the
common
people
within
a
time
limit.
Thus
with
the
new
law,
there
is
now
a
real
implementation
of
Sugam
(part
of
RGDPS).
Every
citizen
has
the
right
to
contact
the
government
through
this.
It
has
facilitated
the
working
of
the
government
departments.
The
introduction
of
Sugam
has
improved
the
working
of
these
departments
tremendously.
Those
Sugam
has
been
an
excellent
initiative
by
the
government
of
Rajasthan.
Any
citizen
can
file
complaint
relating
to
any
government
department
in
Rajasthan
on
Sugam
platform
and
the
complaints
are
solved
within
record
time.
The
archives
(archives
is
the
department
which
stores
old
documents)
of
Bikaner
has
a
rare
collection
of
over
10
million
old
documents
including
the
important
historical
documents
relating
to
Moghul
Emperors,
Princely
States
of
Rajasthan.
These
documents
also
include
old
Pattas
and
other
land
records.
Earlier
it
was
difficult
to
trace,
locate
and
preserve
such
large
number
of
documents
(there
was
always
a
possibility
of
losing
the
old
documents
in
the
process
of
examination
and
interpretation
as
it
required
a
very
careful
and
delicate
handling).
The
present
director
was
in
his
early
30s
when
he
became
the
director
and
therefore
he
had
a
burning
desire
to
do
something
transformational.
He
submitted
a
proposal
to
start
digitalization
of
documents.
His
proposal
was
accepted
and
he
received
support
from
the
higher
authorities
including
Chief
Minister.
He
found
resistance
from
some
of
his
own
colleagues.
However,
he
took
it
as
a
personal
challenge
and
completed
the
project
in
record
time.
With
the
digitialization
of
all
the
documents,
the
archives
has
become
the
only
such
office
in
this
world
with
more
than
10
million
old
documents
digitialised
and
accessible
online
from
anywhere.
Now
it
is
possible
to
see
any
of
these
documents
from
anywhere
in
the
world.
This
department
is
now
a
great
resource
centre
for
historians
from
across
the
globe.
They
need
not
come
to
this
department
personally
to
check
old
documents.
A
click
is
required
to
search
and
read
a
very
important
document.
At
the
same
time,
the
documents
have
been
duly
preserved
and
they
are
safe
and
intact
physically.
The
life
of
the
document
has
also
increased
and
their
visibility
has
also
increased.
The
archives
has
also
prepared
a
museum,
where
it
has
many
attractions
including
digitalized
documented
contribution
of
great
freedom
fighters
and
digitalized
their
experiences
in
their
own
voice.
The
digitalization
initiative
helps
the
local
citizens
a
great
deal
by
helping
them
in
tracing
out
their
old
land
records,
which
was
otherwise
a
very
difficult
and
time
consuming
task.i
a. Fear
of
unknown
–
Change
introduces
new
circumstances,
new
factors,
new
personalities
and
sometimes
new
culture
also.
There
are
new
practices,
new
forces
and
new
possibilities.
Even
if
it
is
small
change,
it
will
also
have
some
influence
on
the
existing
set
up.
It
is
a
general
tendency
among
human
beings
to
resist
change.
We
don’t
know
about
unknowns
and
change
means
bringing
something
new.
Therefore
it
is
natural
for
all
of
us
to
resist
the
process
of
change.
Example:
-‐
When
family
planning
system
was
introduced
in
India
during
60s
and
70s,
most
of
the
people
opposed
it.
They
were
fearful
about
family
planning
system.
The
government
also
used
force
and
the
people
also
spread
many
rumours
due
to
un-‐known
fears.
All
these
circumstances
created
further
resistance
by
the
people.
b. Established
habits-‐
over
a
period
of
time,
we
develop
some
habits.
Change
means
introduction
of
new
habits.
We
resist
the
new
practices
because
we
have
become
habitual
of
some
practices.
Example:
During
70s
and
80s
the
government
of
India
tried
to
popularize
LPG
Gas
among
households
for
consumption.
Prior
to
that
the
popular
modes
of
cooking
were
either
Kerosene
Stove
or
Wood
or
Coal
or
other
such
items.
When
LPG
Gas
was
introduced
in
homes,
the
home-‐makers
(Housewives)
opposed
it
initially
because
they
were
habitual
of
some
kitchen
appliances
and
they
didn’t
want
to
leave
those
habits.
Today
it
looks
surprising
that
the
ladies
could
ever
oppose
LPG
Gas
as
against
the
old
habits
of
using
Kerosene
Stove
or
other
appliances.
c. Peer
group
pressure
–
we
are
influenced
by
our
peer
groups
in
our
decision
making.
The
peer
group
pressure
is
so
strong
that
it
influences
our
decision
making
process.
We
fail
to
see
the
merits
of
a
decision
beyond
the
points
raised
by
our
peer
groups.
Many
times
we
are
unable
to
take
a
rational
decision
because
the
peer
pressure
puts
us
in
a
decision
making
situation
where
we
have
to
take
decision
on
the
basis
of
the
peer
group
pressure.
Example:
When
banks
started
introduction
of
computerization
in
India,
most
of
the
workers
opposed
it
just
because
it
was
the
decision
of
their
groups.
The
workers
looked
at
the
points
raised
by
their
group
and
didn’t
even
consider
the
merits
which
were
otherwise
apparent.
d. Inability
to
visualize
a
brighter
future:
-‐
people
easily
visualize
what
they
are
habitual
of.
Thus
it
is
the
past
which
is
the
part
of
the
vision
of
the
people.
While
ideally
the
vision
should
be
radically
different
from
past
and
positive
situations
which
bring
joy
and
ecstasy.
Visualising
a
different
but
brighter
future
is
difficult
and
therefore
people
fail
to
agree
to
the
process
of
change.
Example:
-‐
When
E-‐Governance
was
introduced
in
Andhra
Pradesh
and
subsequently
in
other
states
in
India,
there
was
mild
resistance
initially
because
many
government
officers
couldn’t
visualize
the
positive
impact
of
e-‐governance.
Today
after
witnessing
the
amazing
impact
of
E-‐Governance
everyone
praises
and
applauds
the
process
of
introduction
of
e-‐governance.
e. Inability
to
prepare
for
the
change
–
The
process
of
change
is
a
continuous
process
of
growth
and
may
require
preparation
of
people.
This
preparation
is
in
terms
of
psychological,
social
and
mental
preparation
for
a
better
future.
This
may
seem
a
positive
beginning,
but
often
people
will
oppose
it
because
they
are
not
personally
prepared
for
the
change.
It
is
a
fact
that
many
government
officers
and
key
decision
makers
are
not
interested
in
e-‐governance
project.
They
want
to
delay
is
as
much
as
possible.
Those
executives,
who
introduce
e-‐governance,
face
tremendous
pressure
and
opposition
from
other
officers.
During
the
study,
the
researcher
found
that
the
executives,
who
were
trying
to
introduce
e-‐governance,
were
putting
extra
efforts,
taking
extra
risks
and
facing
increasing
threats
from
their
own
peers.
They
were
doing
it
for
the
betterment
of
the
general
public,
but
the
initiatives
were
taking
their
own
pains
and
this
was
causing
them
to
suffer
from
health
related
problems
due
to
increased
stress
level.
There
are
many
factors
which
are
responsible
for
success
of
change
management
in
e-‐governance
initiatives.
These
factors
can
be
described
as
under:
-‐
b. Involving
employees
in
the
change
management
process
and
motivating
them
for
a
noble
cause.
c. Clarifying the technical aspects and removing all fears of the employees
B.
Hard
work
and
commitment
to
introduce
e-‐governance
–
the
executives
in-‐charge
of
implementation
of
e-‐governance
projects
had
to
work
very
hard
and
put
in
the
best
efforts
to
ensure
that
the
project
succeeds.
The
persons
worked
for
15-‐16
hours
a
day
as
per
the
requirement
of
the
project
to
ensure
that
the
e-‐governance
initiatives
meet
the
schedule.
Simplified
technical
features:
the
egovernance
projects
have
tried
to
simplify
everything
including
the
technical
features.
Since
the
common
people
don’t
know
English
in
Rajasthan,
hence
the
portal
is
bi-‐lingual.
Any
person
can
apply
his
grievance
in
Hindi
language.
These
initiatives
have
used
simple
everyday
technologies
in
introduction
of
e-‐governance.
For
example,
the
responsible
government
officers
get
immediate
email
and
SMS
(short
messaging
service)
on
their
mobile.
They
get
reminders
till
they
solve
the
problem.
There
is
an
app
also,
which
can
be
downloaded
on
android
based
mobile
system,
on
which
progress
on
the
matter
is
monitored.
Thus
the
government
officers
are
able
to
monitor
the
progress
and
the
pending
matters
and
take
prompt
steps.
C. Support
from
the
leaders:
These
initiatives
have
received
support
from
the
top
decision
makers
which
have
enabled
the
required
manpower
and
required
financial
support.
Although
there
are
always
constraints,
but
the
moral
support
itself
gives
required
motivation
to
the
employees
to
execute
amazing
projects.
D. Involvement
of
employees:
these
projects
are
successful
due
to
involvement
of
employees.
The
involvement
of
the
employees
at
each
step
of
planning
and
execution
is
crucial
for
the
success
of
any
change
management
initiative.
During
the
implementation
of
these
projects,
the
leaders
have
taken
feedback
of
employees
to
make
the
new
system
and
software
achieve
the
desired
objectives.
Discussions points:
Based
on
discussion
of
above
facts
and
information,
the
readers
can
further
identify
the
various
factors
for
the
success
of
change
management
initiatives
as
mentioned
in
the
above
cases.
Figure
1:
Achievements
of
the
RGDPS
(Source:
A
Government
of
Rajasthan
Presentation
on
RGDPS
Dt.
2/1/2014)
Bibliography
Agranoff,
Robert.
(2006).
Inside
Collaborative
Networks:
Ten
Lessons
for
Public
Managers.
Public
Administration
Review
66,
no.
10:56-‐65.
Ansell,
Chris,
and
Alison
Gash.
(2007).
Collaborative
Governance
in
Theory
and
Practice.
Journal
of
Public
Administration
Research
and
Theory
18,
no.
4:543-‐571.
Auger,
Deborah
A.
(1999).
Privatization,
Contracting,
and
the
States:
Lessons
from
State
Government
Experience.
Public
Productivity
and
Management
Review
14
(March):
435-‐54.
Jain, T. K. (1998): ‘Entrepreneurship for Social Cause: a Study of Western India’, Doctoral Disseration,
Bhavnagar: Bhavnagar University.
Jain, T.K. (2009). Discovering Social Entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Business Review 5(1), 21-34
Jain,
Nirupa
and
Jain
T.K.
(2018)
Transforming
Public
Institution
through
e-‐Governance
:
The
mind
of
the
change-‐maker
Kindle
E-‐book
Jain, Nirupa and Jain T.K. (2018) Organisational Revival through Training and Development Kindle E-‐book
Kesavan,
Raghu
(2012)
India
-‐
Karnataka
Municipal
Reform
Project:
P079675
-‐
Implementation
Status
Results
Report:
Sequence
14.
Washington,
DC:
World
Bank.
Ghosh,
A.
(2005)
Public–private
or
a
private
public?
Promised
partnership
of
the
Bangalore
agenda
task
force,
Economic
&
Political
Weekly,
40(47),
pp.
4914–4922.
Kirk,
J.
A.
(2005)
Banking
on
India’s
states:
the
politics
of
World
Bank
reform
programs
in
Andhra
Pradesh,
India
Review,
4(3/4),
pp.
287–325.
Ranganathan,
M.
(2008)
Grievance
Redressal
Processes
in
Urban
Service
Delivery:
How
Effective
Are
They?
The
Governance
Brief,
ADB,
Issue
17.
Mengers,
H.
A.
(1997)
Urban
Development
in
the
State
Karnataka,
India;
Policies,
Actors
and
Outcome.
Printshop,
Frensdorf
i
For
details,
read
“Change
Management”
written
by
Dr.
Trilok
Kumar
Jain
and
published
on
IU
E-‐Magazine,