Untitled document (1)
Untitled document (1)
Title:
1. The Role of Microfinance in Reducing Poverty and Improving Health Care Access
in Gaibandha District
I. Introduction
Microfinance has emerged as a critical development tool in addressing poverty and improving
livelihoods in rural regions of Bangladesh. In districts like Gaibandha, where poverty remains
persistent and access to health care is limited, microfinance institutions (MFIs) provide small-
scale financial services aimed at empowering low-income households (Yunus, 2003; Rahman &
Akter, 2020).
This research proposal seeks to explore the impact of microfinance programs on poverty
reduction and health care access in Gaibandha District. It will investigate whether microcredit
and related services help improve economic conditions and support better health-seeking
behaviors among rural populations (Hossain et al., 2021).
● Identify challenges microfinance recipients face in using funds for health needs
(Chowdhury & Islam, 2020).
Gaibandha was selected due to its significant engagement with microfinance institutions, such as
Grameen Bank and BRAC, and the presence of diverse rural communities that depend on
agriculture and informal labor for livelihood (Ferdous & Hossain, 2021).
V. Methodology
This study will use a mixed-methods approach (Creswell, 2014):
● Qualitative interviews: In-depth interviews with MFI staff, health workers, and
community members to explore experiences and challenges (Khan & Begum, 2020).
Numerous studies have found that microfinance improves household income, employment, and
asset accumulation, particularly in rural Bangladesh (Khandker, 2005; Mahmud, 2020).
Recent research suggests that financial inclusion through microfinance can lead to better health
care access by increasing household spending capacity and awareness (Ahmed, 2018; Sultana &
Karim, 2021).
Despite positive impacts, challenges such as debt cycles, insufficient health literacy, and misuse
of funds limit the potential benefits of microfinance in health improvement (Chowdhury &
Islam, 2020).
VII. Research Gaps
Although microfinance has been widely studied in Bangladesh, most research focuses on either
poverty or health separately, not both together (Ahmed, 2018; Sultana & Karim, 2021).
● Most studies focus on poverty or health separately, not both (Ahmed, 2018; Sultana &
Karim, 2021).
● Limited knowledge on microfinance’s effect on rural health access (Chowdhury & Islam,
2020).
● This study will explore microfinance’s combined impact on poverty and health locally.
● Inform policymakers and MFIs about effective strategies for integrating financial and
health interventions in development planning.
XI. References
1. Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle Against World
Poverty. PublicAffairs.
2. Khandker, S.R. (2005). Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from
Bangladesh. World Bank Economic Review.
3. Ahmed, S.M. (2018). Microfinance and Health: Emerging Evidence from Bangladesh.
Journal of Health Economics.
4. Sultana, R., & Karim, M.A. (2021). Microfinance and Health Care Access: A Rural
Perspective. Bangladesh Journal of Social Research.
5. Rahman, A., & Akter, T. (2020). The Socioeconomic Impact of Microfinance in Northern
Bangladesh. Rural Development Review.
6. Chowdhury, M.H., & Islam, M.T. (2020). Barriers to Health Outcomes in Microfinance
Programs. Asian Journal of Development Studies.
7. Hossain, M.A., et al. (2021). Financial Inclusion and Social Welfare: Evidence from
Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Development Studies.