ANSYS Mechanical APDL for Finite Element Analysis
ANSYS Mechanical APDL for Finite Element Analysis
Overview
In exercises 4-1, 4-2, and 4-3, you will perform a steady-state structural analysis of a cantilever
beam using 1D, 2D, and 3D models meshed with beam, plane, and solid elements. The beam is
made of aluminum with a Young’s modulus of 73.1 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.33. It is 1 m
in length with a 10x10 cm cross section. It has a load of 5000 N applied to the unsupported end
(Figure 4-1-1). The 1D model will be meshed with BEAM189 elements. The 2D model will be
meshed with PLANE182 elements. And, the 3D model will be meshed with SOLID186 ele-
ments. The goal of each analysis is to determine the deflection at the end of the beam and the
stresses throughout the beam. Once all three models have been solved, the differences and simi-
larities among the results of the three models will be examined.
Model Attributes
• Young’s modulus—7.310e10 Pa
• Poisson’s ratio—0.33
Loads
• 5000 N downward load applied to the center of the free end of the beam
Constraints
File Management
Open a new session of ANSYS using the Mechanical APDL Product Launcher
• Preprocessor > Modeling > Create > Lines > Lines > Straight Line
The solid model geometry specifies the location and length of the beam. The rest of the geometry
is included via the beam’s section properties including its moment of inertia.
Step 4: Mesh
Note that this model only has two elements (element #1 and element #2).
• Click the “Isometric View” button in the Pan Zoom Rotate menu
• Utility Menu > PlotCtrls > Style > Size and Shape. . .
• Turn “[/ESHAPE] Display of element shapes based on real constant descriptions” on
• Click OK
The /ESHAPE command displays elements and element results using shapes determined by the
real constants or section properties that have been defined. This allows you to view the 3D
representation of lower order models.
• Click the “Front View” button in the Pan Zoom Rotate menu
• Utility Menu > PlotCtrls > Style > Size and Shape. . .
• Turn “[/ESHAPE] Display of element shapes based on real constant descriptions” off
• Click OK
• Solution > Define Loads > Apply > Structural > Displacement > On Keypoints
• Click on the keypoint at the origin or specify Keypoint 1 in the text box
• Click OK
• For “Lab2 DOFs to be constrained” choose “All DOF”
• For “VALUE Displacement value” enter 0
• Click OK
Two perpendicular little blue arrows should appear at the left end of the beam to indicate that
the constraints have been successfully applied. In addition, two perpendicular orange double
arrows should appear to indicate that rotations have also been constrained.
Exercise 4-1 127
• Solution > Define Loads > Apply > Structural > Force/Moment > On Keypoints
• Click on the keypoint at the free (right) end of the beam or specify Keypoint 2 in the
text box
• Click OK
• For “Lab Direction of force/mom” choose “FY”
• For “VALUE Force/moment value” enter −5000
• Click OK
A red arrow pointing downward should appear at the right end of the beam to indicate that the
load has been applied successfully.
Step 8: Solve
8-2. Solve
• Click the “Isometric View” button in the Pan Zoom Rotate menu
• Utility Menu > PlotCtrls > Style > Size and Shape. . .
• Turn “[/ESHAPE] Display of element shapes based on real constant descriptions” on
• Click OK
128 ANSYS Mechanical APDL for Finite Element Analysis
• General Postproc > Plot Results > Contour Plot > Nodal Solu
• Choose “DOF Solution”
• Choose “Y-Component of displacement”
• Change “Scale Factor” to “True Scale”
• Click OK
Figure 4-1-3 Plot of Displacement in Y (Isometric View, Element Shapes On): Win32 Graphics (left) and 3D
Graphics (right).
Figure 4-1-3 shows that the deformations in the model are uniform through the cross section of
the beam.
• Click the “Front View” button in the Pan Zoom Rotate menu
• General Postproc > Plot Results > Contour Plot > Nodal Solu
• Choose “Stress”
• Scroll down and choose “X-Component of stress”
• Click OK
Figure 4-1-4 shows the longitudinal stress in the beam. You can see that the maximum stress
occurs at the fixed end of the beam and has a value of 30 MPa. This is the same value as predicted
by beam bending theory. The maximum stress on the top of the beam is equal and opposite in
magnitude to the stress on the bottom of the beam, and there is no stress along the neutral axis or
at the end of the beam where the load was applied. This is also consistent with our expectations.
Figure 4-1-4 Plot of X-Component of Stress (Front View, Element Shapes On, 3D Graphics).
Exercise 4-1 129
• Click the “Isometric View” button in the Pan Zoom Rotate menu
• General Postproc > Plot Results > Contour Plot > Nodal Solu
• Choose “Stress”
• Scroll down and choose “von Mises stress”
• Click OK
Figure 4-1-5 Plot of von Mises Stress (Isometric View, Element Shapes On): Win32 Graphics (left) and
3D Graphics (right).
Figure 4-1-5 shows that the stress at the free end of the beam is uniformly zero.
Figure 4-1-3 shows the vertical displacement in the beam. You can see that there is zero
displacement at the fixed end of the beam and a maximum displacement of 2.758E-3 m at the
free end of the beam. Beam bending theory predicts a maximum displacement of 2.736E-3 m.
Thus, the results of this model are within 1% of the theory.
Figure 4-1-4 shows the longitudinal stress in the beam. You can see that the maximum stress
occurs at the fixed end of the beam and has a value of 30 MPa. This is the same value as pre-
dicted by beam bending theory. The maximum stress on the top of the beam is equal and oppo-
site in magnitude to the stress on the bottom of the beam, and there is no stress along the
neutral axis or at the end of the beam where the load was applied. This is also consistent with
our expectations.
Figure 4-1-5 shows the equivalent stress (von Mises stress) in the beam. The calculation of
equivalent stress involves a square root so equivalent stress is always positive. In this plot, you
can see that the equivalent stress is symmetric about the centerline of the beam. Equivalent
stress is used in the Theory of Plasticity to determine if the material has yielded. This plot
shows that the maximum stress is much lower than the yield stress of 6061-T6 aluminum
(275 MPa). This validates our use of a linear elastic material model.