1954790005
1954790005
six years ago, which resulted in chronic fatigue syn- have kept me both motivated and inspired.
drome and multiple chemical sensitivity. In getting a perspective on the situation we need
ES or RFHS (radiofrequency hypersensitivity) set to remember that the human race has evolved
in about three years ago while' was living in close against a background of geophysical and cosmic
proximity to a communications interstate relay radiation that has been tempered by the earth's
tower that I have since discovered transmits at atmosphere, and that this radiation is low frequency
frequencies 800MHz to 15GHz. This also happened and time-variable in nature. living systems have
to coincide with the sudden expansion of the mobile evolved in response to this energy environment - and
phone industry in Australia. I was living in a metal consequently are dependent on it for survival. The
caravan at the time, which possibly was acting as artificial "electrosmog" that we have created and are
an antenna. rapidly escalating is mechanical and unvaried, and
The sorts of symptoms and difficulties I have billions of times more intense. Although such an
experienced since then have been many and var- elusive and complex issue, scientists have only a
ied-and have at times been very frightening. short period of time in which to come to grips with
Symptoms have included most of what is listed in the nature of the problem before too much irrevers-
reports of health effects and other people's experi- ible damage is done. As any effects will be global,
ences of ES, and I have been virtually homeless they must question vigorously whether it is wise to
since becoming ES/RFHS. This is because if I live in remain apathetic and just "wait and see".
a flat or in close proximity to any dwelling in which Many studies have demonstrated that microwaves
there are mobile phones, computers, TV, radiators, and radiofrequency radiation even at low power
etc. switched on I will not be able to sleep. Where densities, can cause an array of diseases and health
I live now, in a caravan in a friend's garden, was effects involving cancer, leukaemia, cataracts,
very difficult at first - before I learned to use the EM Alzheimer's, depression, nervous system changes,
modulator. I would be just dropping off to sleep and cardiovascular problems, seizures, male infertility,
then start having seizures. Sometimes my heart and much else besides. (Newspaper articles regard-
would stop shortly after falling asleep, and this was ing male fertility problems have ascribed the cause
the most scary of all. Often this would leave me as possibly due to estrogen-like chemicals, and only
feeling faint and shaky. If I slept at alii would wake give us 50 years.)
up feeling suicidally depressed. With the help of Many of these health conditions may be caused
alternative remedies and the modulator I have been by interference with the pineal gland and the brain,
able to keep my head above water sufficiently well which are sensitive to EMFs and EMR (electromag-
to respond to the "flight or fight" mechanism that netic radiation) generally. Recently, the Australian
was triggered after I had heard about the hundreds media has reported that brain-scanning equipment in
of low-orbit satellites to be launched in the next use just prior to an earthquake in New South Wales
couple of years. I chose fight rather than flight measuring 5.5 on the Richter scale showed that the
(partly because there was nowhere to fly to), and as brain was indeed respon9ing electrically to stimuli in
a result have begun an extraordinary journey. How- a marked way. This quite coincidental discovery
ever, I am not able to forget my condition for a min- lends considerable weight to the research evidence
ute. that low power signals of EMR have a marked effect
So while my personal situation continues to be on the brain. Interestingly, the Australian govern-
worrying, the journey has led to a very positive and ment appears to be taking the problem of low-level
broad ranging direction in my thoughts-positive, in EMR interference with electronic equipment far more
that I have been able to develop a much deeper seriously than the threat to biological systems.
um1Nstanding of the possible implications of where One of the most commonly observable health
all;s wireless technology might lead, and it's trends over the last couple of years is endemic short
lor .erm effects on human beings. Observing term memory loss. Also on the increase are thought
health effects in myself and others, and then linking and speech process problems and poor coordination.
them to all the available research literature has Generally healthy people are often unable to make
enabled me to speculate on the future in a way that the connection between what they experience, and
would otherwise not have been possible. The what is in the research literature, and often put
canary in the mine shaft scenario! I have also been adverse health changes down to stress or aging. I
privileged during this time to meet many new and believe these symptoms extend beyond mobile
Recent Developments
Lucinda Grant
On May 5, 1997 while phoning Arizona Senator representatives more in our favor. In planning a
John McCain's Washington D.C. office to investi- Congressional hearing, we will need scientists and
gate the possibility of a Congressional hearing for medical doctors willing to testify on our behalf.
the electrically sensitive, I was informed of an In other Congressional news, Congressman
upcoming Congressional hearing planned for May Edward Markey of Massachusetts sent the Food and
13th. This planned hearing was to be essentially an Drug Administration (FDA) a letter on April 7, 1997
industry affair, at which time various wireless requesting a status report about the safety of cellular
industry groups were to review their concerns phones. Markey states:
regarding cellular antenna siting issues such as the "The government has a responsibility to assess
moratoriums, with possible further preemption of for consumers whether portable wireless phones
local laws in mind. I did not believe that this hearing pose a health risk...In 1993, when I first raised
would be complete without public input regarding the issue of cellular phone safety, there were
the health issues of this technology so I let others roughly 15 million people in the United States
know about this hearing. The EMR Alliance was using such phones. Today there are 45 million
particularly helpful. Several EMF activists with users of wireless phones, yet we are still unable
various concerns - antenna sitings on schools, to certify the safety of this product for American
cancer issues, ES, etc.-began calling and faxing consumers because adequate research apparently
Senator McCain's office asking that the public be has not been performed. ,,1
invited to testify at this hearing regarding health The FDA response to Markey stated in part
issues. The public was told that the speakers' list "... there is currently no specific information
was closed, despite the fact that public notice of that clearly indicates that use of cellularphones
this hearing had not yet circulated. After much is a human health risk. On the other hand,
debate, Senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina, there is not enough information available to
who had the legal right to allow one more speaker, permit a determination that there is no health
did exercise this right so that one member of the risk. A significant research effort, involving
public would be allowed to testify. However, after exposures of large numbers of animals to the
the public was allowed to come to speak, the various types of cellular phone modulation in
hearing was cancelled, actually "indefinitely post- current or expected use, coupled with epidemi-
poned". Why is unknown. Perhaps the meeting will ological surveillance of exposed populations, is
be postponed to a future date that the public may needed to provide a further basis for risk as-
not so easily find out about and therefore will not sessment of these devices. "2
attend. The ES need a Congressional hearing at An experiment is therefore underway on the
which time the concerns of the ES could be present- public with the government apparently neither
ed in full and held in the company of Congressional directly monitoring it nor addressing the health
Electrical Sensitivity News (lSSN 1086-2897) is published bi- WARNING: Environmental illness is a
monthly by Weldon Publishing, PO Box 4146, Prescott AZ complex topic.
86302 USA. Annual subscription rates: $20.00 USA, $35.00 Methods or treatments that benefit
Foreign. Internet Website: http://www.bslnet.com/esn/ some people may harm you. Readers
Copyright © 1997 by Lucinda Grant. All rights reserved. Print- are advised to consult appropriate medi-
ed in the United States of America. Lucinda Grant, editor of cal, legal, or other professionals for
the newsletter, is founder of the Electrical Sensitivity Net- personal guidance prior to making chan-
work and author of The Electrical Sensitivity Handbook. ges in their current program.
issues as they become apparent. For instance, the "Your second concern is that no federal agency
FDA response included an appendix listing several is prepared to do anything about complaints it
studies including the Institute for Working Life study receives. As we discussed on the phone, individ-
from Sweden which showed headaches associated ual cases, such as those reported to you, can lead
with cellular phone use. (See ES News Vol. 1, No. to research studies which are designed to investi-
1, p. 5.) Headaches related to cellular phone use gate a hypothesis being investigated. Studies
have been publicly reported in England, Australia, which examine possible electrical and magnetic
and the U.S. as well. 3.4.5 In addition, the FDA effects require special exposure systems which
appendix included the new Australian cancer study are not available in a typical toxicology laboratory
which showed twice as much cancer in rats ex- and thus research funds must be dedicated to
posed to cellular phones as control group rats. 6 This developing such exposure systems. The report
was a major, wireless industry funded study by which you sent, 'Electrical Hypersen-
Telstra that used 900 MHz GSM digital cellular sitivity'(Danish conference proceedings), also
phones. Copies of the FDA response letter are illustrates that conflicting reports can result.
available from Rep. Markey's office at 2133 Ray- Carefully designed studies would be necessary in
burn Bldg., Washington DC 20515; phone: (202) order to define exposures and examine results.
225-2836. "FDA has a small internal research program but
On May 16, 1997, the FDA answered my initial is not a primary external funding agency. The
letter of January 28, 1997 in which I outlined my federal government agency which would be the
concerns regarding the new wireless communica- most likely funding agency to receive proposals
tions technology as it applies to the ES. Despite my and consider funding research in this area is the
repeated phone calls and letters explaining the National Institute of Environmental Health Scienc-
urgency of the situation, the FDA is apparently es (NIEHS). It is the agency which has planned
taking a wait and see approach. and administered the RAPID program addressing
The following is an excerpt from the FDA re- possible risks of extremely low frequency (ELF)
sponse letter: radiation. NIEHS will issue a report to Congress at
"Your letter expresses two primary concerns the end of the RAPID program. Concerns about
about those who report electrical sensitivity (ES). electrical sensitivity can be brought to the atten-
First, that no federal agency is monitoring health tion of NIEHS for consideration for future research
effects of the electrically sensitive, particularly programs.
related to wireless technologies. FDA can set a "You have specifically asked about the creation
standard for radiation-emitting electronic devices of 'neutral zones' of reduced use of wireless
when a risk to humans has been demonstrated. technology, and also what measures FDA would
For example, FDA administers the microwave take to assist those displaced. Because FDA's role
oven standard. Such a standard must be based is in regulating radiation-emitting electronic prod-
upon evidence accepted in the scientific commu- ucts, creating radiation-free zones is outside
nity. In order to evaluate scientific evidence, FDA FDA's responsibility.
scientists monitor research done at universities, "You also ask what measure FDA will take on
companies, and other research institutions, behalf of the electrically sensitive and the public
participate in scientific meetings, contribute to in general to assist those displaced and to protect
research agendas, and follow international scien- others from being electrically sensitive. FDA
tific research. In the case of wireless technolo- works actively with other federal agencies and the
gies, FDA is following studies in epidemiology, scientific community to monitor and develop
dosimetry, and in vitro and in vivo bioeffects research which is designed to investigate whether
which are ongoing and being published. As risks exists. Bringing your concerns to research
results studies are published concerning electrical agencies for evaluation for future research pro-
hypersensitivity, FDA can monitor these results grams could help in understanding the reports you
as well. are receiving. "7
"FDA also monitors reports of adverse effects The FDA letters reminded me of a class action
sent to FDA about products regulated by FDA. lawsuit (Verb et al vs. Motorola et al) filed against
FDA has established a 'Medwatch' program for cellular phone manufacturers that was dismissed in
such reports. You can receive forms through 1- an Illinois court of appeals in 1996. 8 The suit claimed
BOO-FDA-10BB. that cellular phone EMFs cause "biological effects"
39. Gerson, Max M.D. A Cancer Therapy. Bonita CA: the mung beans at 1 inch. Remove the ones that
Gerson Institute, 1990, pp. 167-173. haven't sprouted as these will be very hard and
40. Neal, Paul A. et al. Mercurialism and its Control in inedible. Extra sprouts can be refrigerated in a
the Felt-Hat Industry. Washington DC: National Institute covered bowl and rinsed once daily. Good in salads,
of Health, 1941, p. 40. sandwiches, etc. While raw foods are healthy in
41. Holum, John R. Organic and Biological Chemistry. limited quantities, patients with food sensitivities,
New York: Wiley, 1996. chemical toxicity, or porphyria should consult their
42. Santillo, Humbart, BS, MH. Food Enzymes: The doctor before adding new enzyme-rich foods to their
Missing Link to Radiant Health. Prescott Valley AZ: diet. An excellent booklet called "Sprouting for
Hohm Press, 1987.
Health in the 90's: Build Your Immune System and
43. Howell, Edward. Enzymes for Health and Longevity.
Detox Your Body" provides instructions on growing
Woodstock Valley CN: Omangod Press, 1980.
44. Rea, William J., M.D. Chemical Sensitivity, Vol. 1.
many types of sprouts at home. This booklet is
Boca Raton FL: CRC Press, 1992. available from The Handy Pantry, 2129 E. Cedar,
45. Casarett, Louis J., Ph.D. Toxicology: The Basic #3, Tempe AZ 85281 USA; cost US: $6.45. Outside
Science of Poisons. New York: Macmillan, 1975. the U.S., inquire first regarding the postage cost.
• Attention: Doctors/Scientists-The Electrical Sensi-
tivity Network is compiling a list of medical doctors
and scientists willing to testify in Congressional
hearings and in court cases on behalf of the electri-
ENDNOTES cally sensitive. If you are a doctor or scientist
• Finding Enzymes-Supplementing the diet with willing to assist the ES, please send a synopsis of
enzymes is sometimes proposed as a way of replac- your area of expertise with contact information to
ing lost enzymes. However health food store sup- Electrical Sensitivity Network, PO Box 4146, Presc-
plements in general can contain additives that some ott AZ 86302.
people may be allergic to. The good news is that • Ultrasound Inquiry-Lana Miller would like to hear
enzymes are found in all raw, nonirradiated foods. from anyone who has been injured by ultrasound.
Enzymes are heat sensitive, so once food is cooked, She writes:
enzymes are easily destroyed. "/ have hard knots along both sides of my spine
Salads and raw fruits are some of the common that developed during ultrasound. They tense up
ways of adding enzymes to the diet. One type of and prevent me from using both arms in a repeti-
raw food that is particularly rich in enzymes is tious way. Please write me at 1655 Gales Court,
sprouts. Alfalfa sprouts, radish sprouts, and clover Forest Grove OR 9 7116 USA. "
sprouts are commonly found at health food stores.
A Local War
Lucinda Grant
In the beginning of January 1997, I started has a large chemically sensitive (MCS) population
educating the local governments about the on- due to low pesticide use and emphasis on "clean
slaught of wireless technology due for this area- industry". The county became aware of the MCS
Yavapai County, Arizona. In the initial phase of this population a few years ago due to legal problems
process, I visited the city and county planning and from the use of Iignosite on some of the well-trav-
zoning departments, explained electrical sensitivity, eled dirt roads to keep the dust down. Now, as I told
and gave them a letter requesting to be notified the cqunty, the MCS would be at risk again with
about future public hearings for cellular antenna the proliferation of wireless technology throughout
permits. I also spoke with the city and county risk the area.
managers and sent the letter to them. The county The new county building where the hearing was
risk manager suggested that I follow the public scheduled was not accessible to most of the MCS,
notices in the paper or call the planning due to the chemicals used in the building's structural
departments periodically for information about materials, now outgassing. In preparation for the
upcoming hearings. This advice proved to be most June 18 hearing, the Yavapai Association for the
valuable and was how I found out about two US Chemically Sensitive and I contacted the county to
West cellular antennas proposed for the rural towns plan access for the MCS and ES. The county decided
of Mayer and Humboldt; the first county hearing for on a conference call for those who could testify by
these was June 18. phone and written testimony for those unable to use
Prior to the hearing, I prepared an overview of a phone. Given a time to call in, the call participants
the primary health concerns surrounding this tech- could testify then listen to the hearing in full by
nology-ES and cancer-and gave it to the city and phone via a speaker phone at the hearing site. As it
county attorneys and the planning offices. This turned out, six people testified by conference call;
packet of information was mailed to the county one used written testimony. The written testimony
planning and zoning commission members by the was entered in the public record of the meeting but
county planning office along with the US West was not read aloud, although it should have been
application information for review prior to the read to those in attendance. (Because it was not
commission hearing. read aloud, the testimony by letter did not appear in
The two cellular carriers here, US West and the minutes of the meeting.)
Cellular One, previously sited their analog antennas The sound quality of the conference call was not
on surrounding mountains. The Mayer and Hum- adequate for everyone. This problem could have
boldt applications were the first direct intrusions on been due in part to an inoperable microphone for
local towns. those testifying in person at the hearing room. Also,
Complicating matters for the county, this area the on-site participants were not able to hear the
Electrical Sensitivity News (ISSN 1086-2897) is published bi- WARNING: Environmental illness is a
monthly by Weldon Publishing, PO Box 4146, Prescott AZ complex topic.
86302 USA. Annual subscription rates: $20.00 USA, $35.00 Methods or treatments that benefit
Foreign. Internet Website: http://www.bslnet.com/esn/ some people may harm you. Readers
Copyright ~ 1997 by Lucinda Grant. All rights reserved. Print- are advised to consult appropriate medi-
ed in the United States of America. Lucinda Grant, editor of cal, legal, or other professionals for
the newsletter, is founder of the Electrical Sensitivity Net- personal guidance prior to making chan-
work and author of The Electrical Sensitivity Handbook. ges in their current program.
conference callers well because the county's chemically sensitive and/or electrically sensitive in
speaker phone was too small for the size of the the Mayer area and in Yavapai County in general.
room and was not placed in front of the chairman's Electrical sensitivity has historically been called .
microphone, which was working. radio wave sickness or microwave sickness. Some
Three of the MCS and/or ES personally appeared electrically sensitive patients in other areas have
to testify. One wore a respirator, except while had to leave their homes to escape the symptoms
testifying. The hearing room had a noticeable they develop from exposure to electromagnetic
chemical odor and was adjacent to a room marked radiation from new cellular antennas. And, where
"Electrical Room". Not a suitable location for either will the electrically sensitive go? I suggest that
the MCS or the ES. I attended in person. cellular service does not have to be complete
At the hearing, it was announced that the appli- everywhere, particularly in the outlying areas-it
cation for the Humboldt antenna was pulled prior to isn't that important.
the hearing because of public opposition. A petition What is important is that disabled people are
was circulated by the community in that case. The not run out of their homes by an environmental
Humboldt tower will bypass public input because pollutant from which they have no protection in
the proposed site is already zoned for it, necessitat- their homes. "
ing only approval through the county Board of Curiously, the Federal Communications Commis-
Adjustments regarding safety issues related to sion rules for antenna sitings developed under the
where the antenna might fall. federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, specifical-
Thirteen people in total opposed the Mayer anten- ly states that "environmental effects" (which are
na. Two were elderly women who live close to the being interpreted to include health effects) cannot be
proposed tower site and were concerned about the considered in the siting of wireless facilities. Some
aesthetics of a 150-foot antenna in the neighbor- people say this is unconstitutional, but no one has
hood. After hearing the MCS and ES testify, they yet tested it in court. Meanwhile, the county attor-
also became concerned about the health risks. ney emphasized to the commission members at the
My packet of information provided to commission hearing that due to the Telecommunications Act,
members before the meeting included a request for health concerns could not be considered in determin-
a six-month moratorium on new wireless applica- ing the viability of the tower application. In response
tions. During the six-month term, the county could to this comment, my testimony included the follow-
plan placement of the antennas, to minimize public ing:
exposures as much as possible. At the meeting, the "No class of citizens are dispensable in the
county attorney was present to state that certain name of technology. That would be against civil
laws restrict the use of moratoriums by counties in rights law, the Americans with Disabilities Act,
Arizona and this use of a moratorium would not fit the National Environmental Policy Act, the Consti-
within the requirements. tution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
During the hearing, I objected to the tower on adopted by the United Nations and basic moral
several grounds: and ethical standards of a civilized society. "
"First, a 150-foot tower in the middle of I concluded my testimony by discussing the
Mayer will be an eyesore for many people. I Harvard and Boston University petition opposing
suspect that the primary reason for the tower is Sprint's PCS system.
to provide better phone service to passersby on One commission member suggested that the
the highway, with local Mayer coverage a sec- Mayer tower application be set aside for 90 days
ondary benefit. As citizens of the Mayer commu- while the location of a "less sensitive site" was
nity will not be the primary users of the service, investigated. This motion did not pass. Another
they should not have to bear the brunt of this commission member asked" Are we going to serve
unsightly menace. Second, I believe the transmit- the majority that needs a very good communications
ting range for a tower of this size would be about system or a minority that may be affected by these
4 miles in every direction. Why must the Mayer radio waves?" This statement and the hearing made
community sit under a transmitter this powerful page one news of the county newspaper, which
when it could be relocated further away from the favorably reported on the concerns of the MCS and
downtown area? Third, no advance planning or ES. The Mayer tower was approved by the planning
consideration has been provided regarding anten- and zoning commission members 6 - 2.
na placement with regard to those who are The second hearing, for final approval of the