IO (PRELIM)
IO (PRELIM)
Paired comparison - A form of ranking in which * STEP 6 Observe and document performance
a group of employees to be ranked are compared The next step in the performance appraisal
one pair at a time. process is for supervisors to observe employee
behavior and document critical incidents as they
Forced distribution method - A performance occur.
appraisal method in which a predetermined Critical incidents - A method of performance
percentage of employees are placed into a appraisal in which the supervisor records
number of performance categories. employee behaviors that were observed on the
job and rates the employee on the basis of that
Objective Measures record.
A second way to evaluate performance is use
called objective, or hard, criteria The importance of documentation
- Quantity of work 1. Help supervisor to focus on employee
- Quality of work behavior than traits
- Attendance
2. Help supervisors recall behaviors when to affect the ratings that she makes on each
evaluating performance relevant job dimension.
3. Provides example when reviewing
performance ratings with employees Proximity Errors
4. Helps an organization defend against legal occur when a rating made on one dimension
actions taken against it by an employee affects the rating made on the dimension that
immediately follows it on the rating
Common sources of error when documenting
performance Contrast Errors
- First impression (primacy effect) performance rating one person receives can be
- Recent behaviors influenced by the performance of a previously
- Unusual or extreme behaviors evaluated person
- Behavior consistent with the supervisor’s
opinion Assimilation - A type of rating error in which
raters base their rating of an employee during
* STEP 7 Evaluate performance one rating period on the ratings the rater gave
Obtaining and Reviewing Objective Data during a previous
A supervisor should first obtain and review the period.
objective data relevant to the employee's
behavior * STEP 8 Communicate appraisal results to
employees
Reading Critical-Incident Logs The most important use of performance-
Reading these incidents should reduce errors of evaluation data is to provide feedback to the
primacy, recency, and attention to unusual employee and assess her strengths and
information weaknesses so that further training can be
implemented.
Completing the Rating Form Normally, in most organizations a supervisor
Once critical-incident logs have been read and spends a few minutes with employees each year
objective data reviewed, the supervisor is ready to tell them about the scores they received
to assign performance appraisal ratings. during the most recent evaluation period.
While making these ratings, the supervisor must
be careful not to make common rating errors The supervisor should communicate the
involving distribution, halo, proximity, and following:
contrast. (1) the role of performance appraisal
(2) how the performance appraisal was
Distribution Errors conducted
Leniency error - certain raters tend to rate every (3) how the evaluation process was
employee at the upper end of the scale accomplished;
regardless of the actual performance of the (4) the expectation that the appraisal interview
employee. will be interactive;
Central tendency error, which results in a (5) the goal of understanding and improving
supervisor rating every employee in the middle of performance.
the scale.
Strictness error, rates every employee at the Sandwich Feedback
low end of the scale. • Positive feedback
• Constructive feedback (identify areas of
Halo Errors improvement and sources of concern, but
occurs when a rater allows either a single dont make it bland! Give actionable tips too)
attribute or an overall impression of an individual • Positive feedback
Feedback should be candid, specific and
behavioral rather than personal.
Awareness and acknowledgment of external
factors for performance is especially important
because we have a tendency, called the
fundamental attribution error, to attribute
others’ failure or poor performance to personal
rather than situational factors.
Progressive discipline
Providing employees with punishments of
increasing severity, as needed, in order to
change behavior.
Inability to Perform
an organization will need to prove that the
employee could not perform the