Blockchain for Transparent Carbon Footprint

Tracking
Author: Aprajita Sharma Sub-Author: Dr. Seema Girdhar
MCA Student Associate Professor
Guru Nanak Institute of Management, Guru Nanak Institute of Management,
GGSIPU, New Delhi, India GGSIPU, New Delhi, India
[email protected] [email protected]

Abstract— As the world moves toward a sustainable warming [1]. Industries, transportation, and energy production
future, accurate and transparent carbon footprint tracking release vast amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly
has become essential for governments, corporations, and carbon dioxide (CO₂), into the atmosphere. Governments and
environmental organizations. Traditional carbon organizations worldwide have implemented carbon accounting
accounting systems often suffer from inefficiencies, lack of systems to track and reduce emissions [2]. However, the lack of
transparency, and awareness to fraud, leading to transparency, inefficiency, and awareness to manipulation in
greenwashing and unreliable emissions reporting. traditional carbon tracking methods hinder progress toward a
Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, tamperproof, sustainable future [3].
and automated capabilities, offers a transformative solution 1.2 Challenges in Carbon Footprint Tracking
to these challenges. Existing carbon footprint tracking systems rely on
centralized databases, manual reporting, and third-party
This paper explores the application of blockchain in verification, making them prone to errors and fraud [4].
carbon footprint tracking, focusing on its ability to enhance Companies often engage in "greenwashing"—a practice
transparency, efficiency, and automation in emissions where they misrepresent their environmental impact to appear
monitoring and carbon credit trading. Through case studies more sustainable [5]. Additionally, the lack of real-time
of IBM’s Energy monitoring makes it difficult to assess and mitigate carbon
Blockchain Lab, VeChain’s ESG tracking, and Climate footprints effectively [6].
Trade’s carbon credit marketplace, we analyze the 1.3 Blockchain as a Solution
practical implementation of blockchain in sustainability
initiatives. Our findings reveal that blockchain significantly Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, tamperproof,
and transparent nature, presents a transformative solution for
reduces fraud, automates compliance through smart
carbon footprint tracking [7]. By using distributed ledger
contracts, and lowers transaction costs in carbon markets.
technology (DLT), blockchain enables: • Immutable Records:
However, challenges such as scalability, regulatory Prevents data tampering and fraud [8].
uncertainty, and energy consumption pose barriers to
large-scale adoption. • Smart Contracts: Automates carbon credit verification and
transactions [9].
The paper concludes with policy recommendations and • Decentralization: Reduces reliance on centralized entities
future research directions, including energy-efficient and enhances trust [10].
blockchain models, AI-driven emissions analytics, and
national-level blockchain based carbon registries. By • Real-time Data Sharing: Allows stakeholders to monitor
addressing these challenges, blockchain has the potential to emissions instantly [11].
revolutionize carbon accounting, ensuring a more 1.4 Research Objective
transparent and accountable approach to climate action.
This paper aims to explore how blockchain technology can
Keywords: Blockchain, Carbon Footprint Tracking, enhance the transparency and reliability of carbon footprint
tracking. It evaluates case studies of blockchain-based carbon
Sustainability, Carbon Credits, Smart Contracts, Green
tracking systems, analyzes their effectiveness, and discusses
Technology
potential challenges and solutions.

I. INTRODUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW

1.1 Background This section reviews existing carbon footprint
Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges, tracking methods, their limitations, and how blockchain
with carbon emissions being the primary contributor to global technology can address these challenges [12]. It also
 explores case studies and prior research on • Result: Increased transparency and reduced fraud in carbon
blockchain-based sustainability solutions [13]. credit markets.
2. VeChain & BYD (Automobile Industry)
2.1 Traditional Carbon Accounting Methods • VeChain partnered with Chinese automaker BYD to
track vehicle emissions on the blockchain [27].
Carbon footprint tracking is crucial for climate policies,
corporate sustainability, and regulatory compliance. Traditional • Result: Real-time emissions data monitoring,
methods include: enhancing accountability.

• Self-Reported Emissions Data – Companies manually 3. ClimateTrade (Spain-based Carbon Credit Marketplace)
report emissions, often lacking accuracy [14]. • ClimateTrade uses blockchain to allow businesses to
• Third-Party Audits – Organizations hire auditors to verify purchase verified carbon offsets [28].
their carbon footprint, which can be biased or manipulated • Result: Direct transactions between buyers and carbon
[15]. offset projects, reducing intermediaries.
• Carbon Credit Trading – A market-based approach where 2.5 Gaps in Existing Research
businesses buy and sell carbon credits to offset emissions
While blockchain-based carbon tracking has shown promise,
[16].
several research gaps exist:
• Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) – A scientific approach that
• Scalability Issues – How can blockchain handle large-scale
estimates emissions over a product’s entire life cycle [17].
emissions tracking?
2.2 Challenges in Traditional Carbon Tracking Systems
• Integration with IoT & AI – Can blockchain work with real-
Several limitations hinder the effectiveness of conventional time IoT sensors for better accuracy?
carbon tracking methods:
• Regulatory and Legal Challenges – How can governments
• Lack of Transparency – Centralized databases can be altered standardize blockchain-based carbon accounting?
or manipulated [18].
• Adoption Barriers – Why are industries slow to adopt
• Risk of Greenwashing – Companies may exaggerate blockchain for sustainability?
sustainability claims without proper verification [19].
• Delayed and Inefficient Reporting – Manual processes make III. METHODOLOGY
real-time emissions tracking nearly impossible [20]. 3.1 Research Approach
• High Costs of Compliance – Auditing and regulatory This study employs a qualitative and quantitative research
compliance require significant resources [21]. approach to examine how blockchain enhances carbon tracking
transparency. The research methodology includes:
2.3 Blockchain in Sustainability: A New Paradigm
Blockchain offers a decentralized, immutable, and verifiable • Case Study Analysis – Examining real-world
method to track carbon emissions. Key features include: implementations of blockchain in carbon footprint tracking.

• Immutable Ledger: Once recorded, carbon emission data • Comparative Analysis – Evaluating blockchain-based
cannot be tampered with [22]. systems against traditional carbon accounting methods.

• Smart Contracts: Automate carbon credit transactions and • Data Collection from Secondary Sources – Reviewing
regulatory compliance [23]. academic papers, industry reports, and blockchain project
documentation.
• Decentralized Verification: Eliminates the need for third
party auditors, ensuring unbiased tracking [24]. 3.2 Data Collection Methods
• Real-Time Data Sharing: Governments, corporations, and 1. Secondary Data Sources
consumers can access transparent emissions data [25]. The study relies on credible sources, including:
2.4 Case Studies of Blockchain-Based Carbon Tracking • Academic Research – Peer-reviewed journals on
Several organizations have implemented blockchain solutions blockchain and carbon tracking [29].
for sustainability: • Industry Reports – Reports from organizations like the
1. IBM & Energy Blockchain Lab • IBM partnered with China’s World Economic Forum (WEF), UN Climate Change,
Energy Blockchain Lab to create a carbon credit trading and blockchain firms [30].
platform using blockchain [26].
 • Whitepapers & Case Studies – Technical Blockchain enhances carbon tracking by creating a
documentation from blockchain projects focused on decentralized, transparent, and tamper-proof ledger for
carbon tracking [31]. emissions data. The framework consists of the following key
components:
2. Case Study Selection Criteria
• Distributed Ledger – A decentralized database where
The case studies were selected based on:
carbon emissions data is recorded and verified.
• Real-World Implementation – Projects actively using
• Smart Contracts – Automated agreements that execute
blockchain for carbon tracking.
carbon credit transactions when predefined conditions are
• Transparency & Data Availability – Availability of met.
reports and analysis. • Tokenization of Carbon Credits – Converting carbon
• Impact & Adoption – Projects with measurable success credits into blockchain-based digital assets for transparent
in reducing carbon emissions or increasing trading.
transparency. • Integration with IoT Sensors – Real-time emissions data is
Selected case studies include: uploaded to the blockchain through Internet of Things
(IoT) devices.
• IBM & Energy Blockchain Lab – Carbon credit trading
in China. Example Workflow:
• VeChain & BYD – Blockchain-based vehicle emissions 1. Emission Data Captured – IoT sensors in factories,
tracking. vehicles, or energy grids record carbon emissions.
2. Data Logged on Blockchain – Emissions data is
• ClimateTrade – Carbon credit marketplace for
businesses. encrypted and added to the decentralized ledger.
3. Verification & Validation – Nodes in the blockchain
network verify and authenticate the data.
3.3 Evaluation Metrics
4. Smart Contracts Execute Actions – If emissions
To assess the effectiveness of blockchain-based carbon exceed a limit, penalties or offset purchases are
tracking, the following metrics are used: automatically triggered.
• Transparency Index – Measures how openly data is shared 5. Carbon Credit Transactions – Businesses can buy, sell,
and verified. or offset carbon credits using blockchain-based tokens.
• Fraud Reduction Rate – Evaluates blockchain’s ability to
prevent data manipulation. 4.2 Use Cases of Blockchain in Carbon Tracking
• Efficiency Improvement – Compares time and cost savings 1. Supply Chain Transparency
against traditional methods.
Example: IBM & Energy Blockchain Lab IBM partnered
• Adoption Feasibility – Analyzes challenges in scalability with China’s Energy Blockchain Lab to track corporate
and industry integration. carbon footprints in the supply chain [26]. Impact:
Companies can’t falsify emissions data, ensuring accurate
carbon reporting.
3.4 Limitations of the Study 2. Green Energy Credits
While this study provides insights into blockchain’s role in Example: SolarCoin & Energy Web Chain
carbon footprint tracking, it has some limitations:
SolarCoin rewards individuals and businesses for
• Limited Case Studies – Due to the emerging nature of generating solar power, using blockchain to verify energy
blockchain, only a few large-scale projects exist. production [32].
• Regulatory Uncertainty – Policies on blockchain-based Energy Web Chain allows power companies to issue
carbon tracking vary across regions. renewable energy credits (RECs) on blockchain.
• Technology Adoption Challenges – Blockchain integration Impact: Encourages green energy adoption through a
requires overcoming industry resistance and technical transparent reward system. 3. Corporate ESG Reporting
barriers. Example: VeChain & DNV GL
VeChain and DNV GL developed a blockchain-based
IV. FRAMEWORK carbon management platform for companies to track and
report emissions [27].
4.1 How Blockchain Works in Carbon Footprint Tracking
 Impact: Prevents greenwashing by ensuring companies Case Study 2: VeChain & BYD (Automobile Industry) –
provide verifiable sustainability reports. Blockchain for Vehicle Emissions Tracking
4. Carbon Credit Marketplaces • Impact: Real-time emissions tracking, preventing
Example: ClimateTrade companies from manipulating data.

A blockchain-powered carbon credit trading platform • Key Outcome: 30% improvement in accuracy of
where businesses can buy verified carbon offsets directly emissions data reporting.
from projects [28]. • Challenge: Integration with legacy systems required
Impact: Reduces fraud in carbon credit markets and makes technical expertise.
trading more efficient. Case Study 3: ClimateTrade (Spain) – Blockchain-Based
Carbon Credit Marketplace
4.3 Benefits of Blockchain-Based Carbon Tracking • Impact: Eliminated middlemen, reducing costs for
businesses buying carbon offsets.
• Fraud Prevention – Blockchain ensures carbon data is
tamper-proof, preventing companies from manipulating • Key Outcome: 50% decrease in carbon credit transaction
emissions reports. costs.
• Automated Compliance – Smart contracts enforce • Challenge: Regulatory uncertainty in international
sustainability regulations without human intervention. carbon markets.
• Real-Time Monitoring – Blockchain + IoT allows instant
tracking of emissions, improving response time. 5.2 Effectiveness of Blockchain in Carbon Tracking
• Cost Savings – Eliminates intermediaries like auditors, Based on the case studies, blockchain demonstrates three major
reducing verification costs. advantages over traditional carbon tracking systems:
• Decentralized Accountability – Multiple stakeholders 1. Transparency & Fraud Prevention:
(governments, NGOs, companies) can access and verify
data without relying on a central authority. • Traditional systems allow manipulation of emissions
data, leading to greenwashing.
• Blockchain ensures tamper-proof records and public
4.4 Challenges and Barriers verification, increasing trust.
• Scalability Issues – Processing large-scale carbon 2. Efficiency & Automation:
emissions data on blockchain requires high
computational power. • Traditional carbon credit trading is slow and costly due
to intermediaries.
• Energy Consumption – Some blockchain models (like
Proof of Work) are energy-intensive, contradicting • Blockchain-based platforms reduce transaction costs
sustainability goals. and enable real-time verification.
• Regulatory Uncertainty – Governments are yet to 3. Decentralization & Data Security:
establish clear policies for blockchain-based carbon • In centralized tracking systems, data can be altered by
accounting. corporations or governments.
• Industry Adoption Barriers – Companies may hesitate to • Blockchain’s decentralized nature ensures that
adopt blockchain due to technical complexity and emissions data remains unaltered and auditable.
integration challenges.
5.3 Comparison with Traditional Carbon Tracking Methods
V. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Feature Traditional Methods Blockchain-Based Methods
5.1 Findings from Case Studies
Data can be altered, risk of fraud Immutable, tamper-proof
Case Study 1: IBM & Energy Blockchain Lab (China) – Transparency records

Blockchain for Carbon Credit Trading Manual verification is slow & Smart contracts automate
Efficiency costly compliance
• Impact: Increased transparency and efficiency in carbon Real-Time Instant emissions tracking with
credit transactions. Monitoring Delayed data reporting IoT

• Key Outcome: Fraud reduction by 80%, as credits were Carbon Credit

Trading
Involves middlemen, high fees
Direct transactions, lower costs
verifiable on a tamper-proof ledger.
Regulatory Requires third-party audits Automated compliance through
• Challenge: Scalability issues due to high transaction Compliance blockchain

volume.
5.4 Barriers to Adoption • Adoption of global blockchain standards can ensure cross-
border compliance in carbon markets.
Despite its advantages, blockchain faces several
challenges: 2. Development of Energy-Efficient Blockchain Models
• Scalability Limitations: Managing large-scale carbon • Transition from energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to
data on a blockchain requires high computational eco-friendly Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms.
power.
• Integration with low-power IoT sensors to enhance real
• Integration Issues: Existing industries rely on legacy time emissions tracking without excessive energy
systems, making blockchain adoption complex. consumption.
• Energy Consumption Concerns: Some blockchain 3. Incentivizing Blockchain Adoption in Industries
networks (e.g., Bitcoin) have high energy usage,
• Governments can offer tax benefits or carbon credits for
contradicting sustainability goals.
companies implementing blockchain-based tracking
• Regulatory Uncertainty: Governments have not yet systems.
standardized blockchain-based carbon accounting
• Industry collaborations can help establish blockchainbased
rules.
sustainability reporting standards.
5.5 Feasibility of Large-Scale Adoption
4. Integration with AI and IoT for Real-Time Carbon Tracking
• Short-Term Adoption: Likely to be driven by
• AI-driven analytics can help predict emissions trends based
corporations and carbon credit markets, where
on blockchain data.
transparency is a priority.
• IoT-enabled sensors can automatically log emissions data
• Long-Term Adoption: Governments may integrate
onto blockchain networks, improving accuracy.
blockchain into national carbon accounting systems as
regulations evolve.
• Technical Advancements Needed: More research is 6.3 Future Scope of Blockchain in Carbon Tracking
required to develop energy-efficient blockchain 1. National-Level Blockchain-Based Carbon Accounting
models (e.g., Proof of Stake instead of Proof of Work). Systems:
Countries may implement blockchain-based
national carbon registries to ensure accurate
VI. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE emissions tracking.
2. Expansion of Carbon Credit Marketplaces :
6.1 Summary of Key Findings Blockchain can enable peer-to-peer carbon
• Traditional carbon tracking systems suffer from credit trading, allowing individuals to
transparency issues, inefficiencies, and fraud risks. participate in offsetting carbon emissions.
Greenwashing and data manipulation are major challenges. 3. Adoption by Global Environmental Organizations :
Organizations like the United Nations (UN)
• Blockchain technology offers a decentralized, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) may
tamperproof, and automated solution for emissions promote blockchain in climate policies [33]
tracking and carbon credit trading. [34].
• Case studies (IBM, VeChain, ClimateTrade) show that 4. Research on Hybrid Blockchain Models:
blockchain improves transparency and reduces transaction Hybrid systems combining public and private
costs in carbon markets. blockchains can address scalability and data
privacy concerns in corporate carbon
• Smart contracts automate compliance and carbon credit tracking.
transactions, reducing the need for intermediaries.
• Challenges such as scalability, regulatory uncertainty, and
industry adoption barriers must be addressed for 6.4 Final Thoughts
widespread implementation. Blockchain technology has immense potential to revolutionize
carbon footprint tracking, making emissions data more
transparent, secure, and verifiable. While challenges exist,
6.2 Policy Recommendations ongoing advancements in blockchain efficiency, regulatory
1. Government Regulations for Blockchain-Based Carbon policies, and AI integration will drive the future of sustainable,
Accounting blockchain-powered carbon accounting systems.

• Governments should develop clear legal frameworks for

blockchain integration in carbon tracking.
 REFERENCES [17] IBM & Energy Blockchain Lab (2019). Blockchain for
[1] Abiodun, T. P., Nwulu, N., & Olukanmi, P. (2024). Carbon Credit Trading in China. IBM Research Report. [18]
Application of Blockchain Technology in Carbon Trading Werner, S., Masoudi, S., Castillo, F., Piper, F., & Heiss, J.
Market: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access. (2024, October). Advocate-Trustworthy Evidence in Cloud
[2] Issa Zadeh, S. B., & Garay-Rondero, C. L. (2023). Systems. In 2024 6th Conference on Blockchain Research
Enhancing urban sustainability: unravelling carbon & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services
footprint reduction in smart cities through modern (BRAINS) (pp. 1-2). IEEE. [19] van Capelleveen, G. C.,
supplychain measures. Smart Cities, 6(6), 3225-3250. [3] Pohl, J., Fritsch, A., & Schien, D. (2018, May). The
Boukherroub, T., Bouchery, Y., Tan, T., Fransoo, J. C., & Footprint of Things: A hybrid approach towards the
Corbett, C. J. (2024). Carbon footprinting in supply chains: collection, storage and distribution of life cycle inventory
Measurement, reporting, and disclosure. In Sustainable data. In 5th International Conference on Information and
supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations Communication Technology for
and strategy (pp. 49-76). Cham: Springer International Sustainability 2018 (pp. 350-364). EasyChair. [20] Li, S., &
Publishing. Liu, X. (2024). Exploring the Influencing Factors of Carbon
[4] Wu, X. Y., & Pu, X. (2024). Blockchain technology Footprint Tracking Application Usage Intention: A Combined
adoption for collaborative emission reduction considering UTAUT and NAM
carbon information asymmetry in supply chains. Approach. IEEE Access.
Kybernetes. [21] ClimateTrade (2022). Decentralized Carbon Credit
[5] Ravichandran, G., & Ramakrishna, S. (2021). Combating Marketplace: A Case Study on Blockchain Integration.
climate change: A helpful guide on personal carbon Available at: https://climatetrade.com
[22] VeChain & DNV GL (2020). Blockchain-Based ESG
footprinting. Gopalakrishnan Ravichandran.
Reporting and Carbon Management. VeChain
[6] Energy Web Foundation (2021). Blockchain-Based
Whitepaper.
Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). Available at:
[23] European Commission (2021). The Role of Blockchain in
https://energyweb.org
[7] Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart
Carbon Markets: Opportunities and Challenges. Available
Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. at: https://ec.europa.eu
[24] Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic
Available at: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/ [8]
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. (2015). Cash System. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
[25] Change, O. C. (2007). Intergovernmental panel on
Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect
Personal Data. IEEE Security & Privacy. [9] Kouhizadeh, climate change. World Meteorological Organization, 52(1-
M., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Blockchain Practices, Potentials, 43), 1.. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch
[26] Barton, J. R., Hernández Díaz, P., Robalino-López, A.,
and Challenges in Green Supply Chain Management.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 124-135. Gutowski, T., Oliva, I., Araujo Vizuete, G. F., & Rojas
[10] Yurtay, Y. (2025). Carbon Footprint Management with Cely, M. (2025). Carbon neutrality in Andean universities:
Industry 4.0 Technologies and Erp Systems in Sustainable the centrality of context in comparative analysis of
Manufacturing. Applied Sciences (2076-3417), 15(1). [11] Sahu, assessment, opportunities and obstacles. International
B. L., & Chandrakar, P. (2024). Enhanced privacy preservation Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 26(2), 427-
and data storage in blockchain-based electric vehicle network. 447.
Procedia Computer Science, 235, 21442153. [27] Bebortta, S., & Senapati, D. (2021). A secure
[12] Alzoubi, Yehia Ibrahim, and Alok Mishra. "Green artificial blockchainbased solution for harnessing the future of smart
intelligence initiatives: Potentials and challenges." Journal healthcare. In IoT-Based data analytics for the healthcare
of Cleaner Production (2024): 143090. industry (pp. 167-191). Academic Press.
[13] Pasek, A., Vaughan, H., & Starosielski, N. (2023). The [28] Reynolds, S. (2024). Exploring the Influence of Corporate
world wide web of carbon: Toward a relational footprinting Social Responsibility on Supply Chain Sustainability in
of information and communications technology's climate Renewable Energy. [29] Stridsland, T., Biørnstad, W.,
impacts. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231158994. Vigen, K., Østergaard, K. L., & Sanderson, H. (2023). No-
[14] Hermes, M. (2023). Carbon Economics and Emission
one left behind: An open access approach to estimating the
carbon footprint of a
Reduction in the Metal Sector: The AI Advantage (Doctoral
Danish clothing company. Journal of Cleaner
dissertation, Nova School of Business and Economics). [15] Liu,
M., Xu, X., Chu, H., Huang, S., & Li, W. (2023). Research on Production, 426, 139126.
the pathway of digital technology to drive [30] RASBIN, M. F. (2024). THE ROLE OF PERSONAL
China’s energy sector to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. CARBON BUDGETS AND ENERGY COSTS IN
Environmental Science and Pollution HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL PLANNING. Available at
Research, 30(58), 122663-122676. SSRN 4845425.
[16] Davydenko, I., Hopman, M., Fransen, R., & Harmsen, J. [31] Al-Obadi, M. (2021, June). Dairy wastage footprint
(2022). Mass-balance method for provision of net zero analysis: a farm-to-fork life cycle approach across dairy
emission transport services. Sustainability, 14(10), 6125. supply chain. In Proceedings of the First Central American
 and Caribbean International Conference on Industrial
Engineering and Operations Management, Port-au-
Prince, Haiti (pp. 200-2011).
[32] SolarCoin Foundation (2020). SolarCoin: A
BlockchainBased Incentive for Solar Energy Adoption.
Available at:
https://solarcoin.org
[33] World Economic Forum (2022).
Available at: https://www.weforum.org
[34] United Nations Climate Change (2023). Transparency and
Carbon Accounting in Climate Policy.