“How to Write a MUN Resolution”
“How to Write a MUN Resolution”
MUN Delegate Guides About MUN PRO Training
Many MUNers find writing a resolution more difficult than public speaking. Don’t worry, the
skills needed to write a MUN resolution paper can be learned, just as speech writing, and
lobbying.
A MUN resolution paper is the formal document produced and adopted by various UN
bodies. In Model UN, it is a summary of the document that contains all the clauses written by
the delegates during the simulation to be voted on at the end.
Before we start to learn how to write a quality Model United Nations resolution paper, it is
useful to be reminded about the basics of MUN.
Table of Contents
Conclusion
However, since it is an official legal document, a resolution has to follow an arguably strict
format before it can reveal the brilliance of its contents and let the ideas behind it shine
through. The specificities of this formatting will be discussed in detail in this article, so keep
reading!
Since a resolution is a legal document, it not only has to be original and brilliant, but it also
has to look a certain way. MUN resolution formatting following the guidelines of that is set by
the United Nations. Every couple of years, the United Nations updates their formatting
:
guidelines for its variety of legal documents, but let’s spare you the read.
In Model UN, a clause is a written instruction which will result in the practical application of
the policy we introduce in our MUN speeches and develop over through negotiation and
lobbying. Putting the ideas in writing lets the other delegates know exactly what they are
voting on. Each clause should cover a separate idea, or aspect, and use sub-clauses to give
further detail of multiple variables or steps are involved.
Preambulatory clauses
A preambulatory clause, as its name suggests, is a clause that comes before the actual
resolution. The sole purpose of these clauses is to give context to the operative clauses and
remind the committee of the mood and framework in which this resolution was produced.
1. uses the substantive form of a verb (-ing): e.g. “recalling” in italics and ends
with a semicolon (;)
2. uses small letters as bullet points (e.g. a) b) c) etc…) for its sub-clauses
3. follows the title or the resolution and the committee name but precedes the
address to the voting parties and the operative clauses.
To give you a visual example, here is a real resolution adopted by the ITU (a United Nations
Agency) in 2014 during its Council.
:
Operative clauses
As the name indicates, an operative clause summarises a policy, something that the member
states present in this committee will be asked to enforce.
Operative clauses are a little trickier than preambulatory clauses, simply because not all
committees have the same prerogatives and the same amount of power. For instance, except
for all-powerful committees like the Security Council, the United Nations cannot give orders
to member states, and will therefore formulate its operative clauses likes guidelines or
suggestions. However, there are many UN bodies who do have resources and a budget but
can only use it within the parameters of their mandate. Therefore, the cautious use of a very
specific vocabulary will be necessary in this case. Do not worry, you can find a list of
operative verbs at the end of this document.
:
An operative clause always:
Preambulatory clauses are often disregarded as futile, because they do not actually
prescribe or recommend anything in a resolution, and yet they are one of the most crucial
parts of resolution writing.
– Have a clear aim in mind. What is this particular clause trying to achieve?
– Organize your resolution logically. Since it is all about convincing your audience (or the
member states), to adopt your resolution, a seemingly logical construction will be your best
ally. An argument is always more convincing when its development seems logical, because
the conclusion reached will feel more natural. It can be chronological, consequential (one
clause triggering another), hierarchies, etc…
– Think of the “W” rule: Who, What, When, Why, hoW? When writing a clause, much like
when writing an article, always ask yourself “does this follow the W rule”? If it does, and all
these W questions have been answered, you can proceed onto the next golden rule.
– There are never enough numbers. This rule cannot be stressed enough. When writing a
clause, whether it is operative or preambulatory, it needs to be backed up with data. Is your
aim to allocate funds to a cause? Write down how much money, its source, and the currency.
Repeat as many times as necessary, without moderation.
– Subclauses are a thing, use them! Paragraph clauses are dull and messy, use sub
clauses as bullet points to make your argument clearer. Ask yourself if what you are about to
write is thorough, original, concise yet satisfying enough to be its own clause, or would it be
better off as a sub-clause in another, similar clause? Using subclauses will also make your
resolution look more precise, more organized, clearer in its aim, and will allow the committee
to discuss each point individually.
– Write as many preambulatory or operative clauses as you need. There is no rule that
says you need more perambulatory or operative clauses. You need the right balance,
depending on what you are discussing. Sometimes a few perambulatory clauses can lead to
many operative clauses. Sometimes many perambulatory clauses can lead to a single course
:
of action.(You can find an example of many preambles for one operative here. Scroll to “How
to build a principled case: Example 1.”)
Here is a small cheat sheet of verbs that are appropriate in most committees.
– Preambulatory: Alarmed by, Approving, Aware of, Believing, Bearing in mind, Confident,
Convinced, Declaring, Deeply concerned, Deeply convinced, Deeply disturbed, Deeply
regretting, Desiring, Emphasising, Expecting, Fulfilling, Fully aware, Fully alarmed, Fully
believing, Further deploring, Guided by, Having adopted, Having considered, Having
examined, Having studied, Having heard, Having received, Keeping in mind, Noting with
regret, Noting further, Noting with appreciation, Noting with approval, Noting with deep
concern, Noting with regret, Noting with satisfaction, Observing, Pointing out, Reaffirming,
Realising, Recalling, Recognising, Referring, Reminding, Seeking, Taking into account, Taking
into consideration, Taking note, Viewing with appreciation, Welcoming.
|
“Where should I put
my name?”
“I want to be a
sponsor of the
resolution!”
Indeed, the abundance of titles to refer to countries who sign a resolution can be confusing.
What is the difference between sponsors, co-signatories, signatories, and what do I do if I do
not agree with this resolution?
Although the jargon can seem a little confusing, the signing in Model UN is actually fairly
simple, and it all depends on your intentions regarding this resolution and your participation
to writing it. It can all be summarised in this alignment chart:
:
You do not have to sponsor everything, all the time, and have the name of your country at
the top of every single resolution in the room. Ultimately, the resolution will affect every
single member state present if adopted, and by the time the list of sponsors and signatories
is produced, the chairs have already decided on their awards policy. So if your name is not
on a resolution, do not worry about it, the debate is the most important part.
N.B. If there is a limit to how many sponsors and signatories can appear on the resolution,
you can still refer to this chart and compare your contributions with your colleagues.
Amendments are included in this resolution writing article because they follow the same
rules for writing as clauses for a draft resolution. The only difference is that amendments are
added individually after a draft has been officially recognized and need to be voted into the
draft to become part of it.
Amendments require a certain number of delegates to sign them before they can be
submitted to the chair for review. Amendments can be submitted at any point in time after a
draft resolution is recognized until it is voted upon. If amendments are voted on before or
after closure of debate depends on each conferences specific rules of procedure.
Friendly amendments are a change to the draft resolution that all sponsors agree with. If
the amendment is also approved by the chair no vote is required and it automatically
becomes part of the draft resolution.
Unfriendly amendments are when one, or more, of the sponsors do not agree with the
change. Unfriendly amendments can both strengthen or weaken a resolution, resulting in
more or less votes and can even force sponsors to vote against the document they drafted.
Unfriendly amendments are typically voted on in order of severity (the order of voting is
usually established by the Chair).
Once the debate is closed the committee moves into formal voting procedure. At this point
unfriendly amendments, if any, are voted upon followed by the draft resolutions.
Once the debate is closed the committee moves into formal voting procedure. At this point
unfriendly amendments, if any, are voted upon followed by the draft resolutions.
As we wrote before, different MUN committees have different scopes of operations. Many
committees HAVE NO EXECUTIVE POWER and thus can’t commit to actions. These
committees can only recommend courses of action in their resolutions. One such example is
:
the Human Rights Council.
Some committees have budgets and can operate within a certain scopem such as the United
Nations Development Program (UNDP) or the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC). The Security Council is the most powerful executive committee with the power
place sanctions and even condemn other states.
– Not all resolutions have Preambulatory clauses (clarify with the type of committee)
– Some committees have a very specific purpose and their resolutions are written
accordingly (for example, a resolution in the Legal Committee will be focused on
international law rather than humanitarian aid or direct conflict resolution)
Directives – Some committees can also write directives (shorter “emergency” operative
clauses). Directives are common in crisis committees but are also used by non-crisis
committees at some MUN conferences.
1. If you have enemies, you’re in the right direction. The strongest resolutions, because
they are so specific, so original and so thorough, will automatically attract some
contradicting spirits in the room. Your aim is the majority, not unanimity. A resolution that
pleases everyone is usually a resolution that achieves nothing at all.
2. Sic Semper Tyrannis. Literally in Latin “Thus always to tyrants”. We all know that ego
plays a huge role in Model United Nations, and this environment nurtures the inevitable
battle of wits. But being bossy instead of being a leader will not get you anywhere. If your
resolution’s adoption is your priority, always learn to listen and compromise. Making people
around you feel heard and valued is the quickest way to their vote.
:
3. Nothing is personal. Model UN is a simulation, where everyone plays a designated role,
and is evaluated on their ability to upkeep that role throughout the conference. Do not let
your emotions guide you through the MUN process, especially in resolution writing. If you,
representing the United States, spend 3 hours trying to convince your best friend,
representing North Korea, to join in on your resolution, you are wasting your time and
everybody else’s. People in MUN will always be and should always be different people inside
and outside of the committee room.
4. Reading is fundamental. Be sure to read your work again, and again, and again before
submitting it. Check for spelling mistakes, formatting errors and, above all else,
inconsistencies. Avoid including clauses that contradict each other, the most common case
being the promotion of peace in one clause while another one prescribes to send thousands
of soldiers on the field.
5. Be prepared, but don’t plagiarise. If there is one thing the chairs hate the most, it’s not
chatterboxes, but clauses and resolutions that were written before even entering the
committee room, and yes, they can always tell. Some MUNers, usually pushed by their
schools or societies, come to the conference with a set of ready-made clauses before the
debate even starts. Since the resolution should be a product of the debate, and since the
figures you will include in your resolution are likely to be made up on the spot, a resolution
prepared in advance will always be a terrible resolution. Enter your MUN conference
confidently with a killer position paper, but always write your resolutions inside the room.
The strongest resolutions would have 51% of the countries voting in favor, the weakest ones
have 100% voting on them. A good resolution will often not have every country on it because
with some topics progress for one country can mean setback for another.
There is no obligation to be on every resolution, and a lot of credit can be given to a country
who is not willing to give up their principles when the majority of the room is working against
its interests. Early on you should have an idea of which clauses can coexist with yours. Is you
see you will need to stay diplomatically relevant without a majority plan your steps
accordingly.
:
Merge or Justify
The only way to justify not merging with another block is if you have a clause that says the
opposite of theirs. Otherwise, it looks like ego is the only reasons you aren’t joining them.
This looks bad to both chairs and other delegates. This means you need a direct clash with
the opposing block.
Example 1
Resolution 1.1: Calls for an increase in the number of peacekeepers between country X and
country Y.
Resolution 1.2: Authorises reinforcements for the peacekeepers serving on the border of
country X and country y.
As we can see, these two clauses call for the same thing in different words. Even if the
troop numbers different, it is unlikely to hold weight.
Example 2
Resolution 1.1: Calls for the increase in the number of refugees into country Z by at least
30% this year.
Resolution 1.2: Demands the number of refugees in country Z be reduced by 20% within the
following year.
It is not enough for clauses in separate resolutions to say completely different things.
Clauses that do not directly contradict can coexist on the same resolution. Blocks often write
entire documents with “obvious” clauses that don’t commit to anything significant. These
same blocks are later are surprised that the spent hours writing practically the same thing.
When the documents are compared, the only clauses that will get air time and be spoken
about are the ones with differences.
The first step to avoid the trap of multiple identical resolutions, be award of the ideas on the
other side. Find something to disagree on and get it into the text early on. Chairs do not look
favorably on blocks that won’t join because of the egos of the sponsors. Credit is only given
to ideological differences and will justified reasons for not being able to work together. A
clause which does the exact opposite of an important clause in your document is the
strongest justification to not join forces and ideas.
:
Review Before You Submit
Nothing wastes time and reduces your credibility like clauses that repeat themselves, or
worse, contradict themselves. This is why reviewing the document after you spent hours
writing, and are exhausted, is so important. Sometimes editing one clause can solve the
problem. Sometimes you need to amend many clauses. Sometimes, extra clauses without a
clear contribution can even weaken your resolution. The worst case is when clause actually
contradict, for example:
13. Calls upon the Security Council to remove all peacekeepers and personnel from Liberia;
One way to avoid this is to put your clauses in order of importance. If each step has its
place, it will be much easier to avoid duplication. Also, with a clause about peacekeepers, the
clauses about increase and decreasing would be of similar importance so both find their way
to the top where the contradiction can be discovered and resolved.
Take some time to think before the rush towards writing a resolution. We improve each time
and the balance for speech writing, delivery, and Model UN in general can be found with
patience, diligence, practice and a willingness to learn.
If someone is too controlling on the draft resolution, you are likely not the only one who is
disenfranchised. Find other delegates who feel like you do. They can be frustrated from
working with other intransigent delegates or with the same one who turns you off to work
with their block.
Once you have a few of those, work on your own clauses and if you come with a sufficiently
sized voting block. This will give you have more bargaining power in the later discussion than
if you let someone else write all the clauses. Do not let the writer dictate everything!
:
The secret to overcoming inflexible power delegates is realizing that resolution writing isn’t
scary. It can seem so at first, but it is really taking the CIA concept and turning it into legal
jargon with a preambulatory or operative phrase at the beginning of the sentence. Once the
idea is in writing, the debate continues and you continue to fight to get your idea passed
with a majority.
The value of writing clauses at home if it helps you a) organize your thoughts and b) get
used to formal clause writing. Your clause drafts will help you understand where to put sub-
clauses, what parts are overdeveloped and what order the parts should be in. If you happen
to be lucky and the committee discusses exactly what you wrote at home you will have a
faster time writing it in committee.
Once you have experience writing draft resolutions you will likely not need the stage of
practicing at home. However, until that point extra practice writing clauses is a good way to
break the ice with yourself and get over your fear of writing.
Conclusion
Writing a good MUN resolution paper is a critical part of guiding your idea from opening
speech to a successfully voted on resolution. The clauses are the policies from your
speeches written form. Resolution writing is a critical part of guiding your idea from opening
speech to a successfully voted on resolution. The clauses are the policy you speak in written
form.
Remember:
– Preambulatory clauses – Why we’re doing it
– Operative clauses – What we’re going to do
Especially for MUN rooms with other advanced delegates, make sure your operative clauses
are backed by preambs, the clauses are presented in order of importance and you have at
least one clause which justifies why you are not merging with another block.
To help you get started, we’ve provided a free “Model UN Resolution Template” that you can
download and use as a guide for structuring your resolution.
Hopefully, this guide shed some light on how to write a draft resolution. Now that you have a
better understanding, the next step is to practice. After all, there is no teacher like
experience. Good luck!