Skin Disease Prediction Model using vision transformer

Algorithm

A PROJECT REPORT

Submitted by

PRAKRITI VIKAS SRIVASTAVA (23BAI10529)

SUNAINA MOHAPATRA (23BAI11159)
TANUSI BANSAL (23BAI11033)
PRACHI SHARMA (23BAI10616)
VANSHIKA RATHORE (23BAI11395)
JANVIE VERMA (23BAI10307)

in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree

of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
in
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
(ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING)

SCHOOL OF COMPUTING SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

VIT BHOPAL UNIVERSITY

KOTHRIKALAN, SEHORE
MADHYA PRADESH - 466114
 DECEMBER 2024

VIT BHOPAL UNIVERSITY, KOTHRIKALAN,

SEHORE, MADHYA PRADESH – 466114

BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

Certified that this project report titled “Skin Disease Prediction Model
using vision transformer Algorithm” is the Bonafide work of
“PRAKRITI VIKAS SRIVASTAVA(23BAI10529),SUNAINA
MOHAPATRA (23BAI11159), TANUSI BANSAL (23BAI11033), PRACHI
SHARMA (23BAI10616), VANSHIKA RATHORE
(23BAI11399),JANVIE VERMA(23BAI10307)” who carried out the
project work under my supervision. Certified further that to the best of my
knowledge the work reported at this time does not form part of any other
project/research work based on which a degree or award was conferred on an
earlier occasion on this or any other candidate.

PROGRAM CHAIR PROJECT GUIDE

Dr. Pradeep Mishra Dr. Subhash Chandra Bose
School of Computing Science Engineering School of Computing Science and
Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Artificial Intelligence

VIT BHOPAL UNIVERSITY VIT BHOPAL UNIVERSITY

The Project Exhibition II Examination is held on APRIL 2025

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, we would like to thank the Lord Almighty for His presence and immense
blessings throughout the course of the project work.

We would like to place on record our heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Subhash Chandra Bose, our
project work guide and Programme Chair of Computer Science and Engineering (AI/ML) at
SCAI for his consistent support and encouragement during all the course of this exercise, as
well as with his precious suggestions that ultimately helped to finish the task.
We thank the entire technical and teaching staff of School of Computer Science and
Engineering for direct as well as indirect help in achieving our goals.
Finally, we would like to express our profound gratitude to our parents, who have provided
unparalleled support during the countless hours we dedicated to ensuring the success of this
project.
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Short Form Full Form

SVM Support Vector Machine
CNN Convolutional Neural Network
MAA Mobile Android Application
RGB Red Green Blue (color model)
YCbCr Luma (Y) and Chroma components Blue-difference (Cb) and
Red-difference (Cr)
TP True Positive
TN True Negative
FP False Positive
FN False Negative
KNN K-Nearest Neighbors
DCT Discrete Cosine Transform
DWT Discrete Wavelet Transform
ANN Artificial Neural Network
ReLU Rectified Linear Unit
API Application Programming Interface
NN Neural Network
 LIST OF FIGURES AND GRAPHS

Figu
re Figure Title Page No.
No.
1 Sample Skin Disease Images 2

2 Flow of Proposed Research Work (block diagram) 6

3 SVM Classification Process Flow 7

4 21

Android App UI Screenshots

5 9

Detection and Analysis (4 Skin Conditions)

6 Image Optimization Example 10

7 Bar Graph – Rate of Disease Detection 11

 ABSTRACT

Skin, being the largest and most exposed organ of the human body, is highly
susceptible to a variety of diseases—many of which often go undiagnosed due to
inadequate medical infrastructure and delayed detection. This research addresses
the challenge of early and accurate skin disease identification by proposing an
intelligent system that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with
a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. The resulting system is
implemented within an easy-to-use Android mobile application designed to
assist both patients and healthcare providers.

The system was trained and evaluated using a curated dataset of approximately
3000 skin disease images sourced from Beni-Suef University Hospital, Cairo
University Hospital, and reputable online platforms. A comparative analysis of
various feature extraction techniques and machine learning classifiers was
conducted, demonstrating the superior performance of the proposed CNN-SVM
model. Experimental results confirm the model’s high accuracy in detecting
multiple skin conditions and its capability to provide users with relevant disease
information and treatment suggestions.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTE TITLE PAGE

R NO.
List of Abbreviations 4
List of Figures and Graphs
5

Abstract 6

1 CHAPTER-1: 9-10
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OUTLINE

1.1 Introduction

2 CHAPTER-2: 11-12
RELATED WORK INVESTIGATION

1. Literature Review

3 CHAPTER-3: 13-17
Methodology
3.1. Flow of Research Work
3.2. Problem Statement and
Research Questions
3.3. Dataset Description
3.4. Classification Steps
4 CHAPTER-4: 18-20
Android Application and Processing Steps
4.1. Image Acquisition

4.2. Preprocessing

4.3. Feature Extraction

4.4. Classification
5 CHAPTER-5: Results 21-24

6 CHAPTER-6: Conclusion 25-28

7 References 29-31
 CHAPTER 1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OUTLINE

1.1 Introduction

Skin, being the largest organ of the human body, acts as the primary defense against
environmental hazards. With increasing pollution, lifestyle changes, and food habits, skin-
related issues have significantly risen. Early detection of skin diseases can prevent severe
health complications and ensure timely treatment. In this era of technological advancement,
machine learning (ML) and image processing offer promising solutions for automated,
efficient, and early skin disease detection.

1.2 Motivation for the Work

Skin diseases can severely affect an individual's health, confidence, and quality of life. In
many cases, people ignore early symptoms or misdiagnose the condition, leading to severe
outcomes. Manual diagnosis can be subjective and time-consuming. The motivation behind
this project is to develop a machine learning-based system that can automatically classify and
predict skin diseases from image data, ensuring timely diagnosis and supporting healthcare
professionals.

1.3 Introduction to the Project

The project focuses on implementing and comparing various machine learning algorithms to
detect and classify skin diseases using image data. The algorithms studied include Logistic
Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Kernel SVM, and Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN). By evaluating their performance based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score,
the project aims to identify the most suitable algorithm for practical application in skin
disease prediction

1.4 Problem Statement

Skin disease diagnosis in clinical settings often relies on expert analysis, which may be
limited by human error, variability, and availability. There is a need for an automated,
accurate, and scalable solution that can assist in diagnosing skin conditions based on image
inputs. The challenge lies in building a model that can generalize well across different types
of diseases and provide reliable predictions.

1.5 Objective of the Work

The main objectives of this project are:

● To collect and preprocess a skin disease image dataset.

 ● To implement various machine learning algorithms for classification.

● To compare their performance using evaluation metrics like accuracy, precision,

recall, and F1-score.

● To identify the most effective algorithm for accurate skin disease detection.

● To demonstrate the feasibility of applying AI in medical diagnostics.

1.6 Organization of the Project

The project is organized into the following chapters:

● Chapter 1: Project Description and Outline – Provides an overview of the project, its
motivation, problem statement, and objectives.

● Chapter 2: Literature Survey – Reviews existing work related to skin disease

detection using ML and deep learning.

● Chapter 3: Methodology – Details the dataset, preprocessing, and the ML algorithms

used.

● Chapter 4: Implementation and Results – Presents implementation details,

performance metrics, and result analysis.

● Chapter 5: Conclusion and Future Scope – Summarizes the findings and outlines
future improvements.

1.7 Summary

This chapter presented an overview of the project, including its motivation, objectives, and
organizational structure. The growing impact of skin diseases and the potential of machine
learning in the medical domain are the driving forces behind this work. The project aims to
deliver an intelligent, automated solution for early and accurate skin disease detection.
 CHAPTER 2

RELATED WORK INVESTIGATION

2.1 Introduction
The field of skin disease detection has witnessed tremendous growth with the advancement of
machine learning and image processing techniques. Automated systems for disease diagnosis
aim to provide fast, reliable, and cost-effective solutions. This chapter explores the core
domain of the project, reviews previous approaches, analyzes their strengths and weaknesses,
and identifies gaps that motivate the current work.

2.2 Core Area of the Project

The project lies at the intersection of medical image analysis and machine learning
classification. Specifically, it deals with:

● Image preprocessing and segmentation

● Feature extraction from skin lesion images

● Classification using ML/DL algorithms (like CNN, SVM, Naive Bayes, etc.)

● Evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score

This research is focused on enhancing the automated detection of skin diseases such as
acne, lichen planus, and SJS-TEN through comparative analysis of different algorithms.

2.3 Existing Approaches/Methods

2.3.1 Approaches/Methods -1: Rule-Based Systems

Ercal et al. used adaptive color metrics in RGB planes for tumor identification. Image
segmentation was done using coordinate transformation, and tumor borders were extracted for
analysis.

● Techniques used: Color-based segmentation, coordinate transformation, traditional

classification.

2.3.2 Approaches/Methods -2: Classical Machine Learning Models

Demyanov et al. and others employed deep convolutional neural networks to classify skin
lesions and detect dermoscopic patterns. Data augmentation and transfer learning techniques
were also applied.

● Techniques used: CNN, data augmentation, automated dermoscopic pattern detection

2.3.3 Approaches/Methods -2: Classical Machine Learning Models

Celebi et al. used ensembles of thresholding methods for accurate lesion border detection.
Others like Sumithra et al. combined SVM and k-NN for auto-segmentation and
classification.

● Techniques used: Ensemble methods, hybrid models (SVM + k-NN), rule-based

systems..

2.4 Pros and Cons of the Stated Approaches/Methods

Approach Pros Cons

Color segmentation Simple, interpretable, fast Less accurate, not robust

+ Traditional ML to noise or lighting
variations

Deep CNN models High accuracy, end-to-end Needs large dataset, high
learning, robust feature computational cost
extraction

Hybrid/Ensemble Improved performance, Complexity in tuning,

models flexibility longer training time

2.5 Issues/Observations from Investigation

● Traditional methods struggle with the complex patterns and color variations in skin
images.

● CNNs outperform classical ML techniques in terms of accuracy and generalization.

● Most studies lack real-time performance evaluation or mobile deployment.

● Datasets are often limited in size and diversity, leading to overfitting or bias.

● There's a need for integrated models that can handle classification, explainability,
 and user-friendly interaction.

2.6 Summary

This chapter reviewed the core field of skin disease detection using machine learning.
Several methods, including traditional ML, deep CNNs, and ensemble techniques, were
discussed. While CNNs have shown superior accuracy, they also come with challenges
like data dependency and high computation. These observations form the foundation for
selecting and comparing algorithms in the current project, aiming for a balanced solution
that is both accurate and practical.
 CHAPTER 3

REQUIREMENT ARTIFACTS

3.1 Hardware and Software requirements

Hardware:

Compon Specification
ent

Processo Intel Core i5 or higher

r

RAM 8 GB minimum (16 GB recommended)

Hard 500 GB HDD / SSD (minimum 100 GB

Disk free)

GPU NVIDIA GPU (e.g., GTX 1650 or

(for above)
CNN)

Display 1080p resolution monitor

Software:

Software Purpose

Python (3.6 or Core programming language

above)

Jupyter Notebook / Development environment

VS Code

TensorFlow / Keras For implementing CNN model

Scikit-learn For traditional ML models

OpenCV Image preprocessing and

visualization

NumPy, Pandas, Data handling and plotting

Matplotlib

Flask / Streamlit Frontend interface (for

(opt) deployment)

3.2 Data requirements

The project requires a diverse dataset of skin disease images for training and testing purposes.
The following data characteristics are required:

● Image types: High-resolution RGB images

● Classes: At least three disease categories (e.g., acne, lichen planus, SJS/TEN)

● Format: JPG/PNG

● Dataset Size: Minimum 3000 labeled images

● Annotations: Ground truth labels for supervised learning

The dataset may be collected from publicly available sources like:

● HAM10000 Dataset

● ISIC Archive

● Kaggle skin disease datasets

3.3 Function Requirements

● Image Upload Module: Allows users to upload skin images.

● Preprocessing Module: Resizes, normalizes, and enhances the images.

● Classification Module: Detects disease category using selected ML models.

● Result Display: Shows predicted disease class along with probability/confidence.

● Model Comparison Interface (optional): Displays results from different algorithms.

● Log History (optional): Stores user predictions and results for analysis.

3.4 Performance and Security Requirements

Performance Requirements

● The model should provide prediction results within 2-3 seconds.

● CNN should maintain testing accuracy above 90%.

● System should handle image sizes up to 512x512 pixels efficiently.

Security Requirements

● Ensure data privacy for user-uploaded images.

● Restrict access to internal model data and configuration files.

 ● Secure backend APIs (if deployed online) using HTTPS/Authentication.

3.5 Look and Feel Requirements

The user interface should be:

● Simple and intuitive, especially for non-technical users.

● Responsive design suitable for desktops and tablets.

● Consist of:

○ Upload button

○ Preview window for image

○ Output panel showing predicted result

○ Option for comparing methods (optional)

Suggested UI tools: Tkinter, Streamlit, Flask Web App, or HTML/CSS UI.

3.6 Summary

This chapter outlined the essential requirements for the successful execution of the skin
disease detection project. From hardware capabilities and dataset needs to functional modules
and security considerations, each artifact is critical to ensure robust model training, testing,
and real-time performance. These artifacts guide the system design and implementation,
ensuring it is efficient, accurate, and user-friendly.
Performance and security requirements ensure the system delivers fast and reliable
predictions while maintaining the highest standards of data protection and privacy, including
secure communication, authentication, and compliance with legal regulations.
 CHAPTER 4

DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND ITS NOVELTY

4.1 Methodology and Goal

The proposed methodology for legal judgment prediction combines advanced machine
learning models like RNN, CNN, LLM, LSTM, and BERT to effectively analyse and predict
judicial outcomes. Designed to be modular, scalable, and adaptable, this approach can handle
a wide range of legal datasets and be applied to diverse legal cases.

● Data Collection and Preprocessing: First, legal case documents, court judgments,
and statutes are gathered. The data then undergoes a thorough cleaning process,
including text normalization, tokenization, and the removal of irrelevant words (stop
words) to prepare it for analysis.
● Feature Extraction: BERT is used to capture the meaning of words in context, CNN
extracts spatial features, and RNN and LSTM models help understand the sequence
and flow of legal arguments. By combining these features, the system creates a
comprehensive input representation that improves prediction accuracy.
● Model Training: The different models (RNN, CNN, LLM, LSTM, and BERT) are
integrated into a unified framework and trained together. Cross-validation techniques
are used to fine-tune the model and ensure it provides reliable results.
● Prediction and Refinement: After generating predictions about legal cases, the
system is continually refined through feedback from legal professionals. This
iterative process helps improve the system's accuracy and effectiveness over time.
● Evaluation: The system’s performance is measured using metrics such as
accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. It’s deployed on scalable cloud-based
platforms, ensuring it can grow and adapt as more data becomes available or legal
standards change.

4.2 Functional Modules Design and Analysis

● Legal Text Analysis Module: Uses advanced natural language processing (NLP)
techniques to extract key entities, arguments, and relationships from legal texts,
helping the system understand complex legal documents.
● Judgment Prediction Module: Combines the features from various models to predict
legal outcomes, providing confidence scores and detailed textual explanations to
support each prediction.
 ● User Feedback Module: Allows legal professionals to annotate and correct any
inaccurate predictions, contributing to the system's continuous improvement through
iterative learning.
● Visualization Module: Presents insights from the case, including argument flow and
the reasoning behind predictions, in an interactive and user-friendly format that
enhances understanding.

4.3 Software Architectural Designs

● Presentation Layer: This layer focuses on the user interface, allowing users to
interact with the system easily. It handles input for case documents and displays
predictions and other outputs in a clear, visual format.
● Application Layer: Responsible for managing the core logic, this layer coordinates
how different modules interact and ensures smooth workflow between them, allowing
the system to function seamlessly.
● Data Access Layer: This layer ensures secure and efficient access to legal databases
and external APIs, making sure that the system can retrieve relevant legal data
whenever needed.
● Model Integration Layer: It enables smooth communication between the various
models—RNN, CNN, LLM, LSTM, and BERT—ensuring that they work together
efficiently to generate accurate hybrid predictions.

4.4 Subsystem Services

● Prediction Engine: Uses a combination of advanced models to provide accurate and

detailed predictions, helping users understand potential legal outcomes based on past
data.
● Legal Database Service: Stores and retrieves important legal documents like
cases, statutes, and precedents, making it easy for users to find the legal
information they need.
● Analytics Service: Tracks how users interact with the system and monitors the
performance of the model, providing valuable insights to help improve the system
over time.
● Feedback Processing Service: Gathers feedback from legal experts, updates the
training data, and retrains the models to ensure the system continuously evolves and
gets better at making predictions.

4.5 User Interface Designs

 ● Simplicity: The interface is clean and easy to use, ensuring that users can quickly
navigate and interact with the system without confusion.
● Clarity: Predictions are presented in a straightforward way, with clear explanations
that show exactly how the outcomes were reached, helping users grasp the reasoning
behind each prediction.
● Accessibility: The system is designed to be inclusive, offering features like
adjustable text sizes, high colour contrast, and compatibility with screen readers,
ensuring it's usable for everyone, including those with visual impairments.
● Interactivity: With interactive charts, argument flow diagrams, and detailed
decision rationales, the platform allows users to engage more deeply with the
content, making the experience more informative and easier to follow.

4.6 Novelty

● Hybrid Modelling Approach: This system combines the strengths of RNN, CNN,
LLM, LSTM, and BERT to capture the various nuances in legal language, including
meaning, sequence, and structure, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of legal
texts.
● Multi-Feature Fusion: It integrates different features such as semantic meanings,
sequence dependencies, and spatial patterns to create rich, comprehensive
representations of legal data, helping the system understand complex legal contexts
more effectively.
● Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning: Pre-trained models are adapted specifically for
the legal field through targeted training, allowing the system to better understand
legal terminology and concepts while ensuring more accurate predictions.
● Feedback-Driven Iteration: Expert feedback plays a key role in the development
process, enabling continuous refinement of the system. This iterative approach
ensures the model improves with each cycle, incorporating real-world insights into its
predictions.
● Modular and Scalable Design: The system is built to be easily maintained and
scaled, ensuring it can handle increasing amounts of data and adapt to changing
legal standards over time, making it flexible and future-proof.

4.7 Summary

It utilizes cutting-edge machine learning, tailored specifically for the legal industry, resulting
in a strong judgment prediction model in the context of legal systems. Employing this hybrid
strategy combined with the modularity can make scaling of the system highly feasible with an
ability to adapt better with every step into new and unforeseen challenges. The integration of
feedback allows it to evolve continuously, ensuring it meets the unique demands of the legal
domain in a practical and efficient way. Such flexible design helps the system stay relevant,
reliable, and capable of addressing the complexities of legal decision-making.
 CHAPTER 5

TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION & ANALYSIS

1.1 Outline

In this chapter, we explore the technical implementation of the judgment prediction model,
focusing on the integration of advanced machine learning algorithms (CNN, RNN (LSTM),
LSTM, BERT, and LLM) to analyse and predict legal outcomes based on textual data.
Here, we will discuss the Technical Coding and Code Solutions for each algorithm and
examine the end-to-end workflow of the model, including data preprocessing, training,
evaluation, and prediction. Finally, we will summarize the project outcomes and propose
potential future enhancements to improve the system’s performance and applicability.

1.2 Technical Coding and Code Solutions

Fig.1: Code solution for LSTM Model

Fig.2: Code solution for LLM Model

 Fig.3: Code solution for BERT Model

Fig.4: Code solution for RNN(LSTM) Model

 Fig.5: Code solution for CNN

1.3 Summary

In summary, this document provides a detailed exploration of the technical implementation

and analysis of a judgment prediction model, showcasing the application of advanced
machine learning algorithms for predictive analysis in the legal domain.
The development of the judgment prediction model involves preprocessing legal text data,
tokenizing and embedding text, and implementing various machine learning architectures,
including CNN, RNN (LSTM), LSTM, BERT, and LLMs. Key functionalities include
accurate text classification, semantic understanding, and real-time predictions using domain-
specific datasets.
The project emphasizes the integration of these models into a user-friendly interface,
ensuring accessibility and functionality. The document concludes with a summary of
outcomes and recommendations for future improvements, such as incorporating larger
datasets, leveraging multi-lingual models, and expanding functionalities to enhance
predictive accuracy and practical application in legal analysis.
 CHAPTER 6

PROJECT OUTCOME AND APPLICABILITY

6.1 Outline
The project goes into the domain of legal judgment prediction by implementing five
advanced machine learning and natural language processing models: CNN, RNN, LSTM,
BERT, and LLM. Each model is chosen for its distinct capabilities in handling various
aspects of legal texts, ensuring a comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges of
judgment prediction.

CNN, or Convolutional Neural Networks, specializes in extracting local textual patterns,

identifying crucial phrases, clauses, or evidence from legal documents. Localized analysis
makes CNN especially suitable for pre-processing and identifying critical features within
complex legal texts.
RNN, or Recurrent Neural Networks, focuses on modelling sequential data, capturing the
temporal flow and dependencies between sentences or sections. This enables the model to
process chronological events in case narratives, offering insights into sequential dependencies
vital in legal reasoning.

Building on the limitations of RNN, LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) networks provide
the capability to handle long-term dependencies. With its memory cells, LSTM excels at
analysing lengthy case documents, maintaining context across multiple sections and ensuring
consistent understanding of interrelated legal facts.
BERT, or Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, is a paradigm shift in
text analysis, utilizing bidirectional context comprehension and self-attention mechanisms.
This allows BERT to comprehend complex legal language and draw attention to important
parts of the text, such as penalties, accusations, and precedents. Its capacity to align
predictions with logical reasoning enhances interpretability, thus making it a robust tool for
nuanced legal judgments.

LLMs, on the other hand, offer unique versatility in tasks. With extensive pre-training on
large datasets, they can be fine-tuned with very little effort, enabling the model to make
judgment predictions across different legal domains and multilingual scenarios. However,
their performance may be left wanting in specific domains.
By integrating these models, the project seeks to address the critical challenges of accuracy,
transparency, and scalability in legal judgment prediction. CNN aids in efficient feature
extraction, while RNN and LSTM ensure sequential and contextual understanding. BERT
adds depth with its interpretability and contextual precision, and LLMs contribute flexibility
and broad applicability. Together, they create a robust, hybrid solution that enhances the
fairness, efficiency, and accessibility of legal decision-making processes.
6.2 Key implementations outline of the System

1. CNN (Convolutional Neural Network)

Role: It extracts local features such as key phrases or specific legal terms.
Implementation: It is used in the preprocessing stage to identify critical patterns in
legal texts. It also analyses shorter text segments such as clauses, precedents, or
arguments.
Output: It offers efficient feature extraction for downstream tasks.
2. RNN (Recurrent Neural Network)
Role: Models sequential dependencies in case narratives.
Implementation: It captures chronological relationships between events or facts in
case summaries. It processes sequential legal information like timelines of action or
decision.
Output: Understand the timeline flow and causality of legal cases.
3. LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory)
Role: It captures both long-term and short-term dependency in legal texts.
Implementation: It also processes long documents regarding the legal case without
losing the context between the several sections. Stores information to remember for a
longer time and improve the consistency in decisions.
Output: Good interdependent handling of facts of the case and the case history.
4. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)
Role: It captures bidirectional context and improves interpretability.
Implementation: Fine-tuned on domain-specific legal datasets to predict the outcome
such as penalties or charges. Self-attention mechanism is used to focus upon the most
influential parts of the legal texts. Align predictions with legal reasoning for
transparency purposes.
Output: High accuracy and interpretability through attention.
5. LLM (Large Language Models)
Role: It generalizes across tasks without much fine-tuning
Implementation: Multilingual or cross-jurisdictional cases are also handled by large-
scale pre-trained models. Supports rapid deployment to general legal predictions with
minimal task-specific configurations.
Output: Adds to the versatility and scalability in the system for different legal
domains.

6.3 Significant project outcomes

● Improved Accuracy: All models contribute to enhancing judgment prediction

accuracy. CNN identifies key clauses and features, while RNN handles sequential
 data for chronological narratives. LSTM maintains long-term dependencies, and
BERT offers precise understanding of context. LLM provides strong
generalization across various legal cases.

● Greater Transparency: BERT and LLM improve explainability by utilizing self-

attention mechanisms that highlight key case facts and legal reasoning.
Predictions are justified with reference to valid legal precedents.

● Real-time Predictions: The system delivers efficient, scalable predictions for

legal outcomes, reducing the workload for legal professionals and offering
fast, reliable inputs for case resolutions.

● Versatility: The system handles diverse use cases, including judgment,

punishment, and fee prediction. It identifies applicable statutes based on case
data and supports multiple languages and domains with LLM.

● Enhanced Accessibility: The system makes complex legal data more accessible,
aiding individuals with limited legal expertise. It simplifies legal concepts for
easier comprehension and improves access to legal knowledge, especially in
under-resourced environments.

● Contribution to Legal Fairness: The system reduces biases in judgment

predictions by standardizing outputs, ensuring consistency across similar cases.
It also recommends fair sentencing trends based on historical data analysis.

● Comprehensive Comparative Insights: A comparative analysis of model

performance helps optimize the system. LSTM achieves the highest accuracy
(~90%), while BERT excels in contextual understanding with ~88% accuracy.
CNN and RNN are effective in feature extraction and sequence modelling.

● Scalability and Flexibility: The system’s modular architecture allows for

integration with diverse legal systems, making it adaptable to regional laws,
multilingual cases, and ongoing legal updates.

6.4 Project applicability on real world applications

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) using models CNN, RNN, LSTM, LLM, and BERT, has
wide range of real-world application. The applications are as follows:
1. Automating Legal Research: AI models can browse case documents and suggest
pertinent precedents, saving much time and cost for legal experts.
2. Access to Justice: The systems can predict case outcomes for people in underserved
areas who can be provided with minimal legal advice.
 3. Improving Court Efficiency: AI tools can help streamline judicial processes by
handling straightforward cases, reducing backlogs and delays.
4. Risk Assessment for Legal Cases: These models enable lawyers and clients to
evaluate the likelihood of case outcomes, supporting better decision-making.
5. Corporate Legal Management: Companies can use AI predictions to assess risks
and ensure compliance with legal standards.

6.5 Inference
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) with models like CNN, RNN, LSTM, LLM, and BERT is
revolutionizing the way the legal system addresses complex tasks. These models can process
large amounts of legal data to predict judgments, find relevant precedents, and provide
insights both to professionals and individuals alike.

LJP systems help save time and resources by automating time-consuming tasks such as legal
research and risk analysis. This can also reduce judicial delays by processing straightforward
cases, thereby assisting corporations in effectively managing legal risks. More importantly,
these systems make legal guidance more accessible to underserved areas, which means better
access to justice.

On the other hand, to overcome LJP, challenges would include data bias, non-interpretable
models and privacy issues. Biases in data can lead to unfair outcomes, and clarity in the
reasoning behind any model prediction is essential toward trust in legal contexts; privacy is
also a paramount concern because legal information could be sensitive.
When implemented thoughtfully and in an ethical manner, models such as these can
substantially improve efficiency, accessibility, and fairness in the application of justice.
 CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

7.1 Outline
Legal Judgment Prediction systems, backed by models like CNN, RNN, LSTM, LLM, and
BERT, can provide transformative capabilities for the legal industry. Such tools would be
capable of automating tasks, such as legal research, prediction of case outcome, and assisting
in corporate risk management. Streamlining these processes may help in reducing judicial
backlogs, providing legal advisory support to communities that cannot afford quality lawyers,
and ensuring better decision-making efficiency.

However, their usage is not without challenges. Data bias is a big issue, which can perpetuate
historical inequities reflected in legal decisions. There is also the lack of interpretability in AI
models, which will make the adoption of these models very difficult because legal
practitioners need to know the reasons behind a prediction. Moreover, the sensitivity of legal
data requires robust privacy and security measures to avoid misuse or breaches.

To overcome these challenges several steps are necessary. First, this demands the use of
diverse datasets with no bias to ensure fair prediction and models that are designed so as to
offer transparent as well as explainable outcomes consistent with legal reasoning and have
strict data protection so that privacy concerns are addressed and a collaboration between legal
professionals and technological experts is required where these LJP systems are integrated as
an addition rather than a substitution to human judgment. Moreover, regulatory frameworks
that will guide the ethical and responsible use of these technologies must be put in place.

LJP systems could revolutionize legal practices and practices with continued research,
refinement, and ethical oversight. When deployed responsibly, they can improve efficiency
and enhance access to justice within the legal system and promote greater fairness for society.

7.2 Limitation/Constraints of the System

1. Bias in Data: Legal datasets are often riddled with historical biases, which represent
societal inequalities and issues in the judicial system. Such biases may lead to
biased predictions, especially in sensitive cases, and may perpetuate the existing
disparities in legal outcomes.
2. Lack of Transparency: Complex models such as LSTM, BERT, and others are not
easy to interpret and are often considered "black boxes." Legal professionals
require
 transparent, understandable explanations behind the predictions to trust and apply
them appropriately.

3. Privacy and Security Concerns: Since legal data is sensitive, processing the
information through AI systems brings up the issue of unauthorized access or misuse.
Strong privacy measures are a must to protect the data and adhere to the privacy
standards of the law.
4. Regulatory and Ethical Challenges: The use of AI in legal decision-making requires
clear regulations to make it responsible and ethical. Since the legal frameworks
regarding AI in the judiciary are in their developing stages, there is a need for
cautious oversight to avoid misuse.
5. Technical Limitations: Advanced models like CNN, RNN, LSTM, LLM, and BERT
are highly potent but may not be very effective in dealing with legal language
complexity, reasoning, and context. Moreover, these models are prone to rare or
unusual cases, where data is not enough to make an accurate prediction.

7.3 Future Enhancements

1. Improving Data Quality and Diversity: We should use diverse and better-quality
datasets to train these systems moving forward. We would include a wider variety of
legal cases and jurisdictions, reducing bias and improving accuracy in the
predictions. Upgrading data regularly will ensure that the system remains relevant as
laws change.
2. Making Models More Understandable: These systems need to be more user-
friendly in order to gain the trust of legal professionals. We should focus on the
aspect of transparency so that the users can understand how these predictions are
made and, thus, feel confident about the usage of AI in legal decision-making.
3. Strengthening Privacy and Security: The next improvement should be more
focused on the privacy and security of sensitive legal data. The future use of advanced
encryption and maintaining compliance with privacy laws will ensure that information
is safeguarded and trust in AI systems can be established.
4. Integration with Legal Processes: AI should complement human judgment, not
replace it. Future systems must be developed in such a way that they support
legal professionals in decision-making by providing them with insightful
information, while leaving the final decisions to humans.
5. Improving Legal Reasoning: Models such as LSTM, BERT, and LLM should be
enhanced to gain better insight into the intricacies of legal language and reasoning.
Future developments should be targeted towards making AI more robust in dealing
with complex legal arguments and identifying nuances in cases.
6. Ethical Framework and Regulation: As AI becomes increasingly integrated into the
legal system, ethical guidelines and regulations will have to be defined. Further
 development should include collaboration with legal experts to develop frameworks
that ensure responsible and ethical use of AI in the legal system.
7. Real-Time Adaptation: Giving such system the capacity to learn, adapt in real time
will always be the future development as it enables the systems to remain evergreen
by following up with recent decisions and social changes for accurate relevant
predictions.
8. Work together with Legal Experts: Such collaboration between AI researchers and
legal professionals would be necessary for enhancing the efficiency of these systems.
Only through such cooperation would they be able to test these systems in real-life
situations, refine their outputs, and ensure that they meet the practical needs of the
legal field.

7.4 Inference
LJP systems driven by models like CNN, RNN, LSTM, LLM, and BERT can potentially
revolutionize the legal world. LJP systems will automate things like case outcome prediction
as well as aid in legal research, thus saving time, reducing workloads, and making the legal
process even more efficient for a legal professional. They also promise to improve access to
justice, especially for those in underserved or remote areas, by offering insights that guide
individuals and organizations through complex legal matters.

However, there are significant challenges to be addressed. These include issues of data bias,
lack of transparency in decision-making, and privacy concerns. All these have to be
addressed to make these systems fair, trustworthy, and secure. Research, collaboration
between legal and AI experts, and clear ethical guidelines will be required to overcome these
challenges to ensure the responsible use of these tools.

Looking ahead, Legal Judgment Prediction systems will be able to play a major role in
improving the legal system as AI technology continues to evolve. With the right safeguards
in place, they can support human judgment, making legal processes more accurate, efficient,
and accessible for everyone.
 REFERENCES

1. L. Eliot, “Legal judgment prediction (LJP) amid the advent of autonomou ai legal
reasoning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.14620, 2020.
2. M. Masala, R. C. A. Iacob, A. S. Uban, M. Cidota, H. Velicu, T. Rebedea, and
M.Popescu, “jurbert: A romanian bert model for legal judgement prediction,”
inProceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2021, 2021, pp.
86–94.
3. F. de Arriba-Pérez, S. García-Méndez, F. J. González-Castaño, and J. González-
González, “Explainable machine learning multi-label classi- fication of spanish legal
judgements,” Journal of King Saud University- Computer and Information Sciences,
vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 10 180–10 192, 2022.
4. D. Alghazzawi, O. Bamasag, A. Albeshri, I. Sana, H. Ullah, and M. Z. Asghar,
“Efficient prediction of court judgments using an lstm+ cnn neural network model
with an optimal feature set,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 683, 2022.
5. M. A. Kumar, V. Kavitha, A. D. Saswanth, A. Ghanshala et al., “Court judgement
prediction using long-short term memory and convolutional neural network,” in 2023
International Conference on Electrical, Elec- tronics, Communication and Computers
(ELEXCOM). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6.
6. N. Sivaranjani, V. Senthil Ragavan, and G. Jawaherlalnehru, “A neural network
model for Indian supreme court legal judgment prediction,” Journal of Intelligent &
Fuzzy Systems, no. Preprint, pp. 1–12.
7. D. Trautmann, A. Petrova, and F. Schilder, “Legal prompt engi- neering for
multilingual legal judgement prediction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.02199, 2022.
8. N. Aletras, D. Tsarapatsanis, D. Preo¸tiuc-Pietro, and V. Lampos, “Pre- dicting
judicial decisions of the european court of human rights: A natural language
processing perspective,” PeerJ computer science, vol. 2, p. e93, 2016.
9. K. Shirsat, A. Keni, P. Chavan, and M. Gosavi, “Legal judgement prediction
system,”International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol.
8, 2021.
10. Z. Xu, X. Li, Y. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Fanxu, and X. Lai, “Multi-task legal judgement
prediction combining a subtask of the seriousness of charges,” in Chinese
Computational Linguistics: 19th China National Conference, CCL 2020,
Hainan,
China, October 30–November 1, 2020, Proceedings 19. Springer, 2020, pp. 415–429.