0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views1 page

Prisma Flow Diagram Template

The document outlines a systematic review process, detailing the identification and screening of records from various databases, resulting in 237 records screened and 219 excluded as irrelevant. After assessing full-text articles, 14 were evaluated for eligibility, leading to the inclusion of 4 studies in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The flow of the study follows the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Uploaded by

Noxolo Mchunu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views1 page

Prisma Flow Diagram Template

The document outlines a systematic review process, detailing the identification and screening of records from various databases, resulting in 237 records screened and 219 excluded as irrelevant. After assessing full-text articles, 14 were evaluated for eligibility, leading to the inclusion of 4 studies in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The flow of the study follows the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Uploaded by

Noxolo Mchunu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

tifi

tio
en

ca
Id

n Records identified through database


searching Additional records identified
(MEDLINE: n = 27, EMBASE: n = 184, through other sources
CENTRAL: n = 26) (n = 0)

Records after duplicates removed a


(n = 237)
en
Sc
re

in
g

Records screened Records excluded as


(n = 237) irrelevant
(n = 219)

Full-text articles excluded,


gib
ilit
Eli

Full-text articles assessed with reasons


for eligibility (n = 14)
(n = 18) Duplicate: n = 11
Study protocol: n = 3

Studies included in
qualitative synthesis
(n = 4)
ud
ed
In
cl

Studies included in
quantitative synthesis
(meta-analysis)
(n = 4)

a
duplicates were not removed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) interface since
database-specific thesaurus terms were used

Supplementary Figure 1. Study flow diagram using the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) template
From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

For more information, visit www.prisma-statement.org.

You might also like