Scribd
Upload
10 views4 pages

Gibbs_Reflective_Cycle_ELECT303_Prelim

The document is a reflection on the author's experience with quizzes in the ELECT 303 course, detailing scores, feelings of disappointment, and the need for better preparation. It includes an evaluation of the situation, analysis of study habits, conclusions on necessary improvements, and an action plan for future assessments. Additionally, it outlines criteria for evaluating performance in terms of completeness, reflection, presentation, grammar, and timeliness.

Uploaded by

Jhon Sacedon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views4 pages

Gibbs_Reflective_Cycle_ELECT303_Prelim

The document is a reflection on the author's experience with quizzes in the ELECT 303 course, detailing scores, feelings of disappointment, and the need for better preparation. It includes an evaluation of the situation, analysis of study habits, conclusions on necessary improvements, and an action plan for future assessments. Additionally, it outlines criteria for evaluating performance in terms of completeness, reflection, presentation, grammar, and timeliness.

Uploaded by

Jhon Sacedon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle (1988) - Sample

Reflection
Subject: ELECT 303

Reflection: Prelim Quizzes

1. Description
During the Prelim period, I took two quizzes in ELECT 303. I got a score of 5 out of 20 in one
quiz and 6 out of 30 in another. I was not able to take one of the quizzes because I was
absent due to not feeling well, and two quiz papers were not returned to me.

2. Feelings
I felt disappointed and frustrated after seeing my scores. I knew I could have done better,
but I also felt a bit helpless because I was sick and missed a quiz.

3. Evaluation
The experience showed that I wasn’t fully prepared for the quizzes. Not having the quiz
papers made it harder to reflect on what I did wrong and learn from my mistakes.

4. Analysis
I realized that I need to be more consistent with my studying and make sure I catch up
when I miss a class. My performance reflected gaps in my understanding of the lessons.

5. Conclusion
I should have studied more regularly and reviewed the topics in advance. I also could have
asked my classmates or teacher about the quizzes I missed.

6. Action Plan
Next time, I will study more consistently and communicate with my teacher if I am absent. I
will also make sure to keep and review all returned papers for future assessments.
Criteria Excellent (20-17) Proficient (16-11) Satisfactory (10-6) Needs

Improvement

(5-1) Score

Completeness Contains all required outputs with clear organization and coherence. Shows
evidence of consistent effort throughout the semester. Contains most required
outputs, with minor gaps in organization and coherence.

Effort is generally consistent. Missing several required outputs or lacks coherence in


organization. Effort is inconsistent. Many required outputs are missing, and the
organization is unclear. Minimal effort is evident.

Reflection and Growth Includes thorough reflections demonstrating insight, learning


progress, and personal growth. Includes reflections that show awareness of learning
progress but may lack depth. Reflections are present but provide limited insight into
learning progress. Reflections are minimal or missing, showing little evidence of
learning progress.

Presentation and

Organization Portfolio is visually appealing, well-structured, and easy to navigate. Clear


headings, formatting, and logical flow. Portfolio is organized and mostly easy to
navigate, with only minor issues in layout. Portfolio lacks clear organization, making it
somewhat
Difficult to navigate. Formatting is inconsistent. Portfolio is disorganized,

Difficult to

Navigate, and lacks structure. Formatting is poor or missing.

Grammar,

Mechanics, and

Clarity Writing is clear, well-edited, and

Free from grammar and spelling errors. Writing is mostly clear, with a few minor
grammar or spelling errors. Writing has noticeable

Grammar and

Spelling errors that affect readability. Writing contains frequent grammar and spelling
errors that interfere with understanding.

Timeliness Submitted on or before the deadline. Submitted

Slightly late with a valid reason. Submitted late without a valid reason.
Submitted
Significantly late or not submitted at all.

TOTAL (100)

You might also like