0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Funct

The paper presents sharp coefficient estimates for starlike functions of order a and type B, generalizing previous results by MacGregor and Boyd. It defines the class of starlike functions and establishes necessary conditions for univalence and starlikeness. The authors derive inequalities for the coefficients of these functions, demonstrating their applicability to various subclasses of starlike functions.

Uploaded by

Umaima Zahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Coefficient Estimates for Starlike Funct

The paper presents sharp coefficient estimates for starlike functions of order a and type B, generalizing previous results by MacGregor and Boyd. It defines the class of starlike functions and establishes necessary conditions for univalence and starlikeness. The authors derive inequalities for the coefficients of these functions, demonstrating their applicability to various subclasses of starlike functions.

Uploaded by

Umaima Zahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

BULL. AUSTRAL. MATH. SOC.

30A32, 30A34
VOL. 16 ( 1 9 7 7 ) , 415-425.

Coefficient estimates for


starlike functions

M.L. Mogra and O.P. Juneja

Let 5?(a, $) denote the class of functions

ftz) = z + I az11
n
n=k+l

analytic in the unit disc A = {s : | s | < 1} and satisfying

for some a, g (0 5 a < 1, 0 < S 5 l) and for all z £ A . In


the present paper, sharp coefficient estimates for functions in
SjHot, 3) have teen obtained. The results thus obtained not only

generalize the corresponding results of Thomas H. MacGregor


{Michigan Math. J. 10 (1963), 277-281), A.V. Boyd (Proa. Amer.
Math. Soa. 17 (1966), 1016-1018) and others, but also give rise
to analogous results for various other subclasses of starlike
functions.

1. Introduction
Let f(z) be regular in the unit disc A E {3 : |s| < 1} and
normalized by the conditions /(0) = 0 , /'(0) = 1 . The power series
representation for such a function is

(1.1) ftz) = 3 + I a zn .
n=2

Received 26 January 1977.


415

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
416 M . L . Mogra and O . P . J u n e j a

If f(z) satisfies the condition

(1.2) Re[z ^ 1 } > 0


for all z i A , then it is well known [ 9 , p. 221] that (1.2) is both
necessary and sufficient for / to be univalent and starlike with respect
to the origin in A . For starlike functions the Bieberbach conjecture
\a | 5 n holds for all n , and equality occurs only for the functions

f(z) = js/Cl+es) , where |e| = 1 . MacGregor [6] obtained upper bounds


for the moduli of the coefficients of a starlike function whose power
series representation in A is of the form

GO

(1.3) f(z) = z + £ a zzn


n=k+l

Boyd [7] extended MacGregor ' s result to the class S* of starlike

functions of order a (0 £ a < 1) ; that is, / ( S ' if it is univalent

and Re{zf (z )//(s)) > a for z € A . Various other subclasses of star-


like functions have been considered and corresponding coefficient estimates
obtained for them by Singh [73, 7 4 ] , Padmanabhan [70], Eenigenburg [ 2 ] ,
McCarty [ 7 ] , Mogra [S] , and others.

Recently, the authors [4] introduced the class of starlike functions


of order a (0 £ a < 1) and type $ (0 < f$ 5 1) and made a preliminary
study of its properties. Later, Gupta and Jain [3] obtained certain
results for functions of this class when all a are negative. These

results were the analogues of the corresponding results obtained by


Silverman [72] for starlike functions of order a . However, to broaden
the scope of applicability of the results obtained, the authors [5] have
very recently modified the definition of starlike functions of order a
(0 5 a < 1) and type & (0 < 3 £ 1) , which is as follows.

CO

DEFINITION. Let f{z) = z + £ a zn be analytic in the unit disc


n
n=2
A . Then f is said to be starlike of order a and type 3 , if it
satisfies the condition

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
Coefficient estimates 417

for some a, B (0 < a < 1, 0 < B < 1) and z dA .

The class of starlike functions of order a (0 5 a < l) and type B


(0 < g < 1) we shall denote by S*{a, B) .

It can be easily seen that S*(a, B) includes the subclasses of


starlike functions for different values of the parameters a and B •
Hence a study of its various properties leads to a unified study of these
subclasses. In the present note, we determine sharp coefficient estimates
for the class Sj[(a> B) of starlike functions of order a and type B

whose power series representation is of the form (1.3). The results thus
obtained not only generalize the corresponding results of MacGregor [ 6 ] ,
Boyd [/], and others, but also give rise to analogous results for the
functions of the form (1.3) belonging to the classes introduced and studied
by Singh [73, 74], Padmanabhan [10], Wright [15], McCarty [7], and
Eenigenburg [2].

2. Some coefficient estimates


00

THEOREM. Let f(z) = z + £ a zn be in S*(a, B) .


n=k+l

B(l-a)" .
(a) If B(l-a) > fc(l-S) , let M = Then

for mk + 1 2 n £ (m+l)k , m = 1 , 2 , . . . , M+l and

(b) If B(l-a) < fe(l-B) , then

(2.3)

The estimates in (2.1) are sharp for n = mk + 1 , m = 1, 2, . . . , while


the estimates in (2.3) are sharp for all n .
Proof. We employ the technique used by MacGregor [ 6 ] . Thus, l e t
/ € Stta, B) ; then we have

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
418 M . L . Mogra andO . P . Juneja

(2 k) MB) - zf'(z)-f(z)
( K
' ' 2&{zf (z)-*f(z))-{zf' (z)-f(z)}

where h is regular in A and satisfies |7z(s)| < 1 in A • Also the

power series for h{z) begins with c,z + e, z + ... . Equating

C9efficients of the same powers on both sides of the equation

zf'(z) - f(z) = Mz){2&(zf'{z)-af{z))-[zf'(z)-f(z))}


or
n
(2.5) ££ (n-l)az
az n
n
n=k+l
k+1
k+1z + ...J|28(l-c)a

we o b t a i n

(2.6) (n-l)an = 2&{l-a)cn_1 for n = k+1, k+2, . . . , 2k

Since \h(z)\ < 1 , it follows that Y |e | « 1 and so


n
n=k

(2-7) I \a \2 5 1 .
n=k

From ( 2 . 6 ) a n d ( 2 . 7 ) , we f i n d t h a t

2k
(2.8) £ (n-l)2|a |2< l * 2 2
n

(2.5) can be rewritten in the form

(2.9) | (n-l)«/ + £ d zn
n n
n=k+l n=p+l

{ n=fe+l
p-k
p-K. \

2B(l-a)s + £ ((2B-l)n+l-2a8)a zn\


n
Since (2.9) has the form n=k+l >
F(z) = h{z)G{z) , where |?i(s) | < 1 , i t follows
that

(2.10) i- 0 |F(rei(f) |2dj) 5 i

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
Coefficient estimates 419

for each r (0 < r < l) . Expressing (2.10) in terms of the coefficients


in (2.9), we get

(2.11) | (n-l)2|a

((26-l)n+l-2ctB)2|a
n
n=k+l

In particular, (2.11) implies

(2.12) I (n-l)2\a\2r2n
n
n=k+l
p-k
((2B-l)n+l-2a6)2|a |
n
n=k+l

Letting v -»• 1 in (2.12), we conclude that

(2.13) (n-D2\an | 2 |a n | 2 .
n=k+l

This inequality is equivalent to

(2.H0 f; (n-l)2|aj2
n=p-k+l
p-k
2 2
i ( ) X {((28-l) n +l-2a6) 2 -(«-l) 2 Ha | 2
n=k+l n

Now two cases arise.

(a) If g(l-a) > fe(l-3) , then by an inductive argument we will


establish the inequalities

(m+l)k
(2.15b)

m-

T
g(l-a)"
for m = 1, 2, .... M+l ; M = where [p] denotes the greatest

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
420 M.L. Mogra and O.P. Juneja

integer not greater than p .


For m = 1 , (2.15a) gives
2k
I (n-l)2\a n
| 2 5 l+e2(l-a)2
n=k+l

which i s t h e same a s ( 2 . 8 ) . Thus (2.15a) i s v a l i d for m = 1 . We can


prove (2.15t>) for m =1 by using (2.8) as follows:

2k
T {((2g-l)n+l-2a6) 2 -( w -l) 2 }|a n I 2
fcl

w ± 2. ,2
2 L ~' \ann
n
k n=k+l

How suppose t h a t (2.15a) and (2.15b) hold for m = 1 , 2, . . . , <y-l . Using


(2.I**) with p = (q+l)k and the inductive hypothesis concerning (2.15a),
we obtain the inequalities

(q+Dk p ?
I (n-D2\an\2
n=qk+l

+ ^ {((23-l)n+l-2 aB ) 2 -(n-l) 2 Ha | 2
n
n=k+X
q-1 (m+l)k o c o
+ I I {((2B-l)«+l-2aB) 2 -(»-l) 2 }|a | 2
m=l n=mk+l

feTT f(2B-Dy
m
- p =ol

The last equality can be easily obtained by an inductive argument on q .


This last sequence of inequalities implies (2.15a) where m = q .

Continuing our argument, we ure (2.15a) with m = q to deduce (2.15b)


for m - q as follows:

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
Coefficient estimates 421

[q+l)k o o o
I {((23-l)n + l-2 a B) 2 -(n-l) 2 }|a n | 2
n=qk+l

£ (n_±f\a| | 2

q k n=qk+l

2,2
q k
-1
= {^7 f t
This completes the proof of (2.15a) and (2.15t>). Now (2.1) follows from
(2.15a).

To prove (2.2), suppose n > (M+2)k . Putting p = (q+l)k in


(2. ll*), we have

(q+l)k o o o o qk „ „ „
(n-D 2 |a | 2 < UB2(l-a)2 + I { ((2B-l)n+l-2aB) -(n-1) 2 } \a | 2 .

Hence, for n > (M+2)k , we have

(2.16) (n-D2\an\2

5 U B 2 (l-a) 2 + \ { ( )
{((2B-l)«+l-2}a3)2-(n-l)
| a2}|a n | 2
k
n=k+l

B (1a) + 7 {((2B-l)n+l-2ae)2-(n-l)2}|a | 2
n
n=k+l

{((2e-l)K+l-2aB)2-(n-D2Ha | 2
n

M+l (m+l)k
£ £ {((28-l)«+l-2ctB)2-(n-l)2}|a | 2
m=l n=mk+l
q-X (m+l)k „
E I {((2B-l)n+l-2aB)-(n-l) 2 }|a | 2
2 =mk+l
M+l (m+l)k
s i*B2(l-a)2 + E I {((26-l)«+l-2aB)2-(«-l)2}|a | 2 .
n
m=l n=mk+l

Using (2.15a) in (2.l6), we obtain

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
422 M.L. Mogra and O.P. Juneja

that is,

l a j ~ (n-lHM+l)l ft ((28-1)11 + 2 g ^- g ) ] , n > (M+2)fc

This proves (2.2).

(b) If B(l-a) £fe(l-e), then (2.13) gives

^ (*-D2|a | 2 £ Jtf"

(n-D2\an\2 < l+62(l-a)2 if n 2 fc+i ;

that is,

| | 2p(l-«) lf
1
n' n-1

which gives (2.3).

The function / , given by

shows that the estimates in (2.1) are sharp for n = mk + 1 ,


m = 1, 2, 3, while the estimates in (2.3) are sharp for the function

f{z) = z exP{
where B(l-a) < &(l-3) and n >
Putting 3 = 1 in the theorem, we get the following result due to
Boyd [I}.
GO

COROLLARY 1. If f(z) = s + V a zn is starlike of order a ,


n
n=k+l
0 s a < 1 , then

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
Coefficient estimates 423

KJ - (n-D(m-l)I JJQ [y
where mk+1 < n s (m+l)?c , m = 1 , 2 , . The result is sharp for
n = mk + 1 , m = 1 , 2 , /or the function

The following r e s u l t , due to MacGregor [ 6 ] , can be obtained by taking


(a, 8) = ( 0 , 1) in the theorem.
OO
n
COROLLARY 2. If f(z) = z + Y, a
a zz is in S*(0, 1) , then
n
n=k+l
m-1
Uiv+{2/k)]
-DI" u=0
where mk+1 5 n £ (m+l)fe , m = 1, 2, — . The estimates are sharp for
n = mk + 1 (m = 1, 2, ...) , for

REMARKS. (i) The coefficient estimates determined in [5] for the


starlike functions of order a and type 3 can be obtained by putting
k =1 in the theorem.

(ii) Putting

3 =% ,
(a, g) = (0, %) ;
(a, 8) = (0, (26-D/26 where 6 > %) ;

(a, 6) = (U-Y)/Un), (l+Y)/2)


where 0 < y S 1 , and replacing a by 1 - a and B by % in the
theorem, we get respectively the corresponding coefficient estimates for
the functions of the form (1.3) belonging to the classes introduced by
McCarty [ 7 ] , Singh [J3, 74], Padmanabhan [JO], and Eenigenburg [2].

(iii) The results due to SeniId [7J], Singh [73, 74], Eenigenburg
[2]*Mogra [S], McCarty [ 7 ] , can be obtained by taking different values of
the parameters a,8 ( 0 < o < 1, 0 < J < 1) with k = 1 in the theorem.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
424 M.L. Mogra and O . P . Jusneja

References

[7] A.V. Boyd , "Coefficient estimates for starlike functions of order


a ",Proe. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 1016-1018.

[2] P.J. Eenigenburg, "A class of starlike mappings in the unit disc",
Compositio Math. 24 (1972), 235-238.

[3] V.P. Gupta and P.K. Jain, "Certain classes of univalent functions
with negative coefficients", Bull. Austral. Math. Soo. 14
(1976), kO9-kl6.

[4] O.P. Juneja and M.L. Mogra, "On starlike functions of order a and
type S ". Notices Amer. Math. Soo. 22 (1975), A-38U; Abstract
No. 75T-B80.

[5] O.P. Juneja and M.L. Mogra, "On starlike functions of order a and
type 3 ", Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. (to appear).

[6] Thomas H. MacGregor, "Coefficient estimates for starlike mappings",


Michigan Math. J. 10 (1963), 277-281.

[7] Carl P. McCarty, "Starlike functions", Proo. Amer. Math. Soc. 43


(19710, 361-366.

[£] M.L. Mogra, "On a class of starlike functions in the unit disc I",
J. Indian Math. Soo. (to appear).

[92 Zeev Nehari , Conformal mapping (McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto,


London, 1952).

[70] K.S. Padmanabhan, "On certain classes of starlike functions in the


unit disk", J. Indian Math. Soc. (U.S.) 32 (1968), 89-103.

[7 7] Albert Schild, "On starlike functions of order a ", Amer. J. Math.


87 (1965), 65-70.

[72] Herb Silverman, "Univalent functions with negative coefficients",


Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (1975), 109-116.

[73] Ram Singh, "On a class of star-like functions", Compositio Math. 19


(1968), 78-82.

[74] Ram Singh, "On a class of starlike functions. II", Ganita 19 (1968),
103-110.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492
Coefficient estimates 425

[7 5] D.J. Wright, "On a class of starlike functions", Compositio Math. 21


(1969), 122-12U.

Department of Mathematics,
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur,
Kanpur,
India.

Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 18.206.13.133, on 13 Jun 2020 at 11:33:26, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0004972700023492

You might also like