Page 1

1
2
3 Justice Amanda Chambers CJ 4-6-2025
4 [email protected]
5
6 Cc: [email protected]
7 [email protected]
8 [email protected]
9 [email protected]

10 COMPLAINT
11 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
12 20250604-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Justice Amanda Chambers CJ County Court of Victoria
13 Madam,
14 copy of this complaint will also provided to others, including to the Judicial
15 Commission for its investigation and others and ordinary any person providing this kind of
16 material likely may be given a Phd, as it contains material (including the links provided such as
17 at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati which in totality is not produced by anyone else.
18
19 While this is about legal issues concerning the purported State court system, I wonder if you are
20 one of those people in the process of committing suicide?
21 No, I am not some deranged person who doesn’t accept the rule of law, to the contrary you and
22 others may be the ones not accepting the rule of law!
23
24 https://judicialcollege.vic.edu.au/index.php/news/justice-amanda-chambers-appointed-chief-judge
25 QUOTE
26 Chief Judge Chambers has extensive experience across Victoria’s criminal and civil
27 justice systems, having been a judicial officer for more than 19 years.
28 END QUOTE
29
30 Well to be very honest this kind of statement indicates to me you likely lack a proper
31 understanding of what the rule of law really is about, if after about 19 years you still seem to be
32 involved in the same purported legal system that isn’t, this as it is a mere illusion, as I will show
33 to some extent below.
34 You may have heard about a person lawyer Anne Twomey who I understand is a “constitutional
35 adviser” to various governments:
36
37 In my view Professor Anne Twomey is wrong to claim that “separation of powers”
38 doesn’t exist regarding the states, as the Letters Patent dictates an “IMPARTIAL
39 administration of justice”!
40 You can download the document from:
41 https://www.scribd.com/document/781993946/20241020-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
42 B-to-Professor-Anne-Twomey
43

4-6-2025 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 To my understanding the State of Victorian lacks an “IMPARTIAL administration of justice”

2 this also as the Courts are part of the Department of Justice and not at all a separate entity equal
3 in status as the Legislators and the Executives. The word “IMPARTIAL” clearly indicates a
4 “separation of powers” and as such any court (administration of justice) that is within the
5 Department of Justice is no court at all, at least it lack any legal validity!
6 Therefore, if you spend about 19 years in this kind of system then I view you got a problem, and
7 so anyone else in that purported legal system, as you obviously lacked the knowledge and/or
8 understanding what a true “IMPARTIAL administration of justice” is about!
9
10 Now, let us go back to the opening statement “I wonder if you are one of those people in the
11 process of committing suicide?” and what I refer to this.
12 The Colonies federated to be one “political union” known as the Commonwealth of Australia,
13 however not wanting to be mere provinces of a unification the Framers of the Constitution, being
14 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), held that the Colonies would
15 become “States” where their Colonial constitutions would be come State constitutions albeit as
16 Section 106 of the constitution makes clear “subject to this constitution” and by this the former
17 Colonial constitutions were in fact all amended to be come State constitutions but certain
18 legislative powers the Colonial Constitutions possessed where not transferred to the
19 Commonwealth so it then could legislate for all States (Territories being quasi states) and all
20 and any legislation by the Commonwealth had to be “UNIFORM” throughout the
21 Commonwealth and when it came to taxation then it could be on a “sliding scale” as such
22 income brackets taxation levels.
23 Some of the Framers of the Constitution after federation commenced to be judges of the High
24 Court of Australia and in Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904 immediately violated
25 legal principles embedded in the constitution by refusing to accept the Hansard records of the
26 constitutional conventions despite that the Framers of the Constitution were on record:
27
28 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
29 Convention)
30 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
31 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
32 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 And well in my view the High Court of Australia by this committed TREASON as then for
36 decades judicial decisions were handed down which were an absurdity as to the true meaning
37 and application of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia
38 Constitution Act 1900 (UK)!
39
40 What below is going to follow is so to say a roller coaster ride that in my view lack to have a
41 proper knowledge and/or understanding about. After all, if you did then why continue this utter
42 legal mess ongoing?
43 QUOTE
44 When I very successfully represented Mr Francis James Colosimo as to his alleged
45 “CONTEMPT OF COURT” for which he was placed under Orders of Administration” the
46 following is revealed as part of the transcript:
47
48 QUOTE Transcript 16 March 2009 before Her Honour Habrison J.
49 QUOTE Her Honour at page 21 line 30
50 Now, having heard that you can take a seat and I can have Mr Shorel-Hlavkia speak
51 on your behalf.
52 Mr Shorel-Hlavkia, what were the matters that you wanted to put?

4-6-2025 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : First of all, I’m not a lawyer. I’ve no legal training. I’m a
2 constitutionalist. That means I deal with matters on constitutional matters mainly.
3
4 HER HONOUR : All right. Do you have some – you don’t have any legal training?
5 .
6 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : Absolutely not.
7
8 HER HONOUR : Do you have any qualification in what you say you are?
9
10 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : No, I have no – I am a constitutionalist, so I do assist with
11 parties – with barristers and everything else to assist them with legal work, you know,
12 constitutional matters and everything else, or the Government. You know, that’s
13 ongoing. I publish books about it under the Inspector (indistinct) at Trademark, they
14 are published and (indistinct).
15 END QUOTE Transcript 16 March 2009 Harbison J
16 END QUOTE
17 .
18 During proceedings before Ms Preuss (VCAT) in January 2009 I already had successfully
19 ordered that an instructing solicitor and her Council had to leave the court room (hearing room)
20 on the basis that they had no legal standing, as well as that State Trustees were prohibited to
21 make any decisions regarding Mr Francis James Colosimo while I pursued matters regarding
22 the CONTEMPT OF COURT issue! Her Honour also held that as I submitted that once a party
23 files a “CONTEMPT OF COURT” application then it can no longer withdraw it (as opponent
24 lawyers attempted) because it became the property of the Court. Her Honour also as I submitted
25 permanently stayed the “CONTEMPT OF COURT” case and only Mr Francis James
26 Colosimo request it to be reinstated. Her Honour also upon my submission provided the 6
27 transcripts (including of 5 previous hearing in which I didn’t participate) and I then discovered
28 (albeit weeks after receiving the transcripts) that Mr Francis James Colosimo actually had
29 never been formally charged! And as I submitted to Her Honour no one in the world could have
30 complied with the terms of the orders in relation to which Mr Francis James Colosimo had
31 been allegedly (but never was) charged.
32 Yet, somehow no investigation was held such as the lawyers who were ordered to leave the court
33 room as they had no legal standing then had not charged their client for such attendance.
34 Also, when Mr Francis James Colosimo had collapsed in the court room due to Ms Preuss,
35 after the March 2009 decision by Her Honour Harbison J later that year nevertheless claiming
36 that Ms Preuss involved Mr Francis James Colosimo had been CONVICTED of
37 CONTEMPT OF COURT, that Mr Francis James Colosimo collapsed in the courtroom and
38 Ms Preuss ordered everyone to leave the courtroom other then Mr Francis James Colosimo and
39 myself. I had then to race around to try to get first aid and subsequently an ambulance and
40 subsequently Mr Francis James Colosimo was transported to a hospital!
41 While subsequently Ms Preuss involved government solicitors against me that I was guilty of
42 CONTEMPT OF COURT, ( for daring to challenge Ms Preuss, false allegation published on
43 the internet that Mr Francis James Colosimo had been convicted, etc, and so I representing Mr
44 Francis James Colosimo interest rebutted that, however she miserably failed in this. And
45 subsequently the order for Administration was set aside by the appeal being upheld. Meaning
46 that the Office of the Public Advocate who pursued Orders for Administration (by misleading
47 the medical experts that Mr Francis James Colosimo had been allegedly been convicted in
48 2008) were defeated by me also!
49 Moreover, the municipal council involved in my view had filed a fraudulent case against Mr
50 Francis James Colosimo but nevertheless was not penalised regarding this and still sold up Mr
51 Francis James Colosimo property to pay for charges, including litigation cost! And this is the

4-6-2025 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 kind of system that hardly can be deemed to be a reflection of how a “IMPARTIAL

2 administration of justice” should pursue to provide JUSTICE.
3
4 This was not some isolated case as in 2017 I was requested to assist Roberta Williams to
5 investigate the murder of Carl Williams. A person I had never personally had any dealings. I
6 was then provided with a large box of items and in it discovered that Carl Williams had written
7 (2010) that he suspected that his lawyer Nicola Gobbo was a police informer. I discovered that
8 the Victorian Ombudsman really failed to do a proper investigation and didn’t even know that
9 the police officer involved in delivering the CD to Carl Williams (containing his statements to
10 the Victorian Police) also had likely delivered copies to another inmate. Moreover, the Director
11 of the Prison weeks later disappeared/went missing in the Grampians and reportedly also had a
12 copy of this CD in his vehicle. Obviously, either the police officer who delivered the copy to
13 Carl Williams and/or the Director of the Prison made the copies! In my view the killing of
14 Carl Williams was a set up involving at least one government entity! However, it became
15 worse, as the Victoria Police reneged on the deal it had made with Carl Williams to fund ATO
16 claimed charges against his father George Williams, the grandfather of Dhakota Williams.
17 When I became aware of what I held ATO lawyers perverting the course of justice and
18 undermining the administration of justice I wrote to the ATO lawyers making clear it could not
19 rely upon “AVERT” as it based its case upon against the Estate of the Late George Williams
20 as already in August 2005 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka the court had ruled that the Commonwealth
21 cannot rely upon “AVERMENT” but must file and serve all and any material it relied upon as
22 “evidence”. Despite my writings to the Victorian Ombudsman, IBAC, Chief Justice of the
23 Supreme Court of Victoria, politicians, etc, nothing was done. As such those who are
24 purportedly to uphold the rule of law in reality act to the contrary to this.
25 In my view Dhakota Williams was wrongly robbed of her grandfather’s inheritance and this
26 still should be rectified and the Victorian Police and ATO lawyers to be held legally
27 accountable, as after all if this is not pursued than how on earth can any so-called judge claim
28 people have to abide by the rule of law?

29
30 In AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on 19 July 2006 I (representing myself) comprehensively, on
31 constitutional and other legal grounds, defeated the Commonwealth DPP and the 9 Attorney-
32 Generals who all had been served with the NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER and
4-6-2025 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 the 409 pages written submission ADDRESS TO THE COURT, as to FAILING TO VOTE
2 charges relating to 2001 federal election and 2004 federal election. Then Victorian Attorney
3 General Robert Hulls making known that Victoria would accept the Courts ruling. However,
4 The County Court of Victoria some about 19 years later still has not bothered to provide a
5 REASON OF JUDGMENT even so it finally did acknowledge that I succeeded in both
6 Appeals on 19 July 2006. As result the Commonwealth and the States/Territories blatantly
7 disregarded the courts ruling. Actually, purportedly the State of Victoria charged and convicted
8 me for FAILING TO VOTE in 2014 and had a warrant issue for my arrest this clearly violating
9 the Res Judicata principle where I clearly not only had defeated the FAILING TO VOTE
10 charges on constitutional grounds that the “compulsory” part of voting was unconstitutional but
11 also on numerous other constitutional and other legal grounds!
12
13 After exposing the rot about the Victorian Police, the ATO, and others upon Carl Williams,
14 George Williams and Dhakota Williams I discovered that I was being targeted even more than
15 before including a former police officer destroying a new fence I was building inside my own
16 property, Banyule City Council trespassing, vandalising my (now Late) wife Olga Hlavka-
17 Schorel lawfully parked motor vehicle, damaging private property, and on 29 November having
18 unlawfully gone through a gazebo and then banging onto the back door causing so much a-f a
19 fright to my wife that from that day she no longer was able to walk freely and had to rely upon a
20 wheelchair. Despite matters reported to the Victorian Police to my knowledge no investigation
21 ever was done. More than likely because I since 1982 conducting a special lifeline service under
22 the name MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (FREE OF CHARGE – and so without
23 any government financial support) assisting people to avoid committing suicide, murder and
24 even mass murder I became a sore to the Victorian Police. After all I exposed the
25 unconstitutional conduct of the Victorian government’s MANDATES regarding the covid-19
26 scam involving the Victorian Police also. And the (purported) Courts instead of dealing with
27 matters as to what was constitutionally permissible simply ignored this also.
28
29 KARMA
30 I view it to be KARMA if those who pushed the covid-19 scam and/or facilitated this are then if
31 they went along with getting the fake covid-19 vaccinations now may be in the process of
32 committing suicide.
33
34 In April 2020 I then commenced to write to the Victorian Ombudsman, the Victorian Human
35 Rights Commission, IBAC, Victorian Police, State and Federal governments and numerous
36 others that the States have no legislative powers as to any MANDATES regarding “man-kind”
37 infectious diseases.
38
39 Actually, the states (Territories are quasi states) have absolutely no legislative powers as to any
40 “man-kind” infectious diseases since 1908 when the commonwealth commenced to legislate as
41 to the Quarantine Act 1908 that since was replaced with the Biosecurity Act 2015, meaning all
42 and any “concurrent” legislative powers of the States regarding vaccinations such as against
43 rubella, measles, polio, etc no longer were within the legislative powers of the states since 1908.
44 People were protesting, including at the shrine of Remembrance and the Victorian Police instead
45 of respecting the constitutional rights of citizens rather even went as far to fire rubber bullets
46 upon parents holding small children in their arms. And I understand the courts went along with
47 the TREASONOUS/TERRORISM conduct. So now we effectively have those supposed to
48 uphold the rule of law even pacing not just themselves but also their family members at risk to
49 be harmed if not killed by the fake covid-19 vaccination. In the USA insurance companies
50 already have decided that anyone taking the so called covid-19 vaccination is deemed to commit
51 suicide and insurance payment be denied. And the USA courts also held that covid-19 is not a
4-6-2025 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 vaccine at all. Actually, it is a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION” “Bioweapon”. Those who

2 injected others with it I understand may not at all have been qualified to inject a bioweapon into
3 people and as such I view committed criminal offences, as well as those who pursued this kind
4 of conduct.
5
6 See for extensive set out the following and its supplements totalling more than 7,400 pages of
7 complaint!
8
9 Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) in itself is a Magna
10 Charta and has rights embedded in it. Now we need lawyers, judges and politicians to
11 understand and comprehend what the true meaning and application of the
12 constitution is, so they stop the unconstitutional jabbing demands!
13
14 This document can be downloaded from:
15 https://www.scribd.com/document/536493539/20211102-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
16 B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-
17 Suppl-27-Legal-Principles
18
19
20 In Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904 the High Court of Australia held that municipal
21 corporations cannot legislate, and only can exercise legislation of the state. It held that ‘Council
22 rates’ were a “Land Taxation” power of the states!
23 On 11 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to Commonwealth Land
24 Taxation and as like the 1943 Income Tax legislative powers the States/Territories had to retire
25 from this as the “concurrent” legislative powers for the States were no more, as it had become
26 “exclusive” Commonwealth legislative powers.
27
28 See also:
29
30 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+Barry+
31 Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+March+2011+cl
32 aimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding+land+taxation+retu
33 rned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+constitution+doesn%E2%80%
34 99t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+power+back+to+the+
35 States%3F
36 QUOTE
37 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
38 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative powers
39 regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when the
40 constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive Commonwealth
41 power back to the States?
42 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
43 Answer:
44 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
45 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism. The
46 Australian Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the
47 Commonwealth and the States, and taxation powers are predominantly held by the
48 Commonwealth government.
49 The power to levy taxes, including land taxation, is a fundamental aspect of
50 governance that falls under the exclusive domain of the Commonwealth government
51 as per Section 51(ii) of the Australian Constitution. This section grants the
4-6-2025 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 Commonwealth Parliament the authority to make laws with respect to taxation,

2 which includes income tax but also extends to other forms of taxation.
3 While there are instances where certain powers can be delegated or shared between
4 the Commonwealth and the States through specific agreements or arrangements, any
5 return of exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States would require a
6 constitutional amendment. Without such an amendment, it is legally untenable for
7 the States to unilaterally claim legislative powers over areas that are constitutionally
8 assigned to the Commonwealth.
9 In summary, unless there has been a constitutional amendment or a specific legal
10 provision allowing for such a transfer of power regarding land taxation from the
11 Commonwealth back to the States, it is not feasible for Barry Collier MP or any State
12 entity to assert legislative authority in this matter.
13 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
14 1. Australian Constitution: The primary legal document that establishes the
15 framework for Australia’s federal system of government and delineates the
16 distribution of powers between the Commonwealth and State governments.
17 2. Taxation Laws: Relevant federal legislation and regulations governing taxation in
18 Australia, including provisions related to land taxation and other forms of levies.
19 Legal Commentaries on Constitutional Law: Scholarly works and expert analyses on
20 constitutional law in Australia that provide insights into issues related to federalism, division
21 of powers, and constitutional amendments
22 END QUOTE
23
24 Meaning, that since 11 November 1910 all “council rates” a form of State land taxation as well
25 as any other State land taxation is unconstitutional. Well, forget about having an “IMPARTIAL
26 administration of justice” because when as I view it you got numskull of judicial persons in
27 (purported) power then there no longer is a rule of law! The Parliament (legislators) supposing
28 legislate as to the courts but did they really or just provide imaginary legislation and the
29 (purported) judges go along with that? Show me a purported Victorian state legislation and I can
30 state it is an imaginary state Law and has no legal force at all!
31
32 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start
35 page 2092] Higgins) may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision
36 the practice of the High Court, when declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a
37 declaration applied only to the part which trespassed beyond the limits of the Constitution.
38 If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the interpretation of the whole
39 of the Constitution.
40 END QUOTE
41 .
42 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
43 QUOTE
44 Mr. GLYNN.-I think they would, because it is fixed in the Constitution. There is no special court, but the
45 general courts would undoubtedly protect the states. What Mr. Isaacs seeks to do is to prevent the question of
46 ultra vires arising after a law has been passed.
47 [start page 2004]
48 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
49 END QUOTE
50
51
52 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
53 Convention)
54 QUOTE
4-6-2025 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his
2 mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the
3 states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation according
4 to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by "the sovereign
5 will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care much
6 about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
7 Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains
8 some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either
9 side to attack each other's laws.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 As I indicated above that the colonial constitutions were amended “subject to this constitution”
13 and should have been published in the relevant State Gazette to become official.
14
15 As such the Victorian State Constitution 1855 as from 1 January 1901 should have shown parts
16 of the former Colonial constitution and then with the amended parts which were “concurrent”
17 legislative powers to be exercised until the Commonwealth commenced to legislate upon such
18 subject matters. Further that those powers within Section 52 of the constitution were
19 permanently removed from State legislative powers. Further that any Amendment to the new
20 Victorian State constitution could only be validly done after a State referendum approved of such
21 amendment. Yet, to my knowledge it seems no one bothered about this and simply assumed that
22 the Victorian Colonial Constitution Act 1855 was simply renamed to be the Victorian State
23 Constitution Act 1855 and never was formally proclaimed either.
24 Moreover, in 1975 the state of Victoria purportedly created a new Victorian Constitution Act
25 1975 and since amended it about 120 times without any approval by the State electors by way of
26 State referendum. This means that in fact since 1901 not a single valid legislation was enacted in
27 the then Premier of Queensland Peter Beattie claimed to have replaced in 2001 the
28 Queensland constitution but that was beyond the legislative powers of the State of Queensland.
29 This all means that in reality all and any conviction based upon those kind of invalid Victorian
30 legislation are NULL AND VOID!
31 I in 2016 appeared before Carmody J in Buloke Shire Council v Schorel-Hlavka and made an
32 OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION regarding an appeal I had filed. Carmody J claimed that
33 filing the appeal I conceded jurisdiction. In my view Carmody J lacked competence in applying
34 the rule of law. After all, an Appeal filing cannot oust any OBJECTPON TO JURISDICTION
35 because an opponent may very well claim the Court has no jurisdiction if the Appeal is filed out
36 of time, or whatever. What Carmody had to do was to provide for an “JURISDICTIONAL
37 HEARING” where the prosecutor had to prove there was jurisdiction. (Remember the Supreme
38 Court of Victoria throwing out of the window the charges against the Albert Park protestors
39 because the intended legislation had not been published in the Victorian Gazette! The validity of
40 the legislation rest upon it being published in the Gazette!)
41
42 Way back on 19 July 2006, I also then canvassed before the court, in my submissions, that any
43 objection is to be regarded as “secular” irrespective if a person relies upon being a “religious
44 objection” or not and one cannot question the persons objection as to his/her religious grounds,
45 etc.
46
47 QUOTE ADDRESS TO THE COURT County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
48 I take the position that Subsection 245(14) of the Constitution is not and cannot be regarded to
49 limit the right of a objection to be only a (theistic belief ) “religious objection” but includes also
50 any secular belief objection.
51
52 If Subsection 245(14) was limited to being “theistic belief” then it would be unconstitutional.
4-6-2025 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1
2 QUOTE 4-6-2006 CORRESPONDENCE FAXED 10.36 pm 4-6-2006
3 WITHOUT PREJUDICE
4 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
5 4-6-
6 2006
7 C/o Judy McGillivray, lawyer
8 Melbourne Office, 22nd Floor, 2000 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000
9 GPO Box 21 A, Melbourne Vic 3001
10 Tel 03 9605 4333, Fax 03 9670 4295
11 ref; 02101199, etc
12
13
14 T01567737 & Q01897630
15 AND WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
16
17 Re; “religious objection” (Subsection 245(14) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918)
18 offend Section 116 if the Constitution if it excludes secular belief based objections.
19
20 Madam,
21 As you are aware I continue to refer to my religious objection albeit do wish to indicate that
22 while using the “religious objection” referred to in subsection 245(14) of the Commonwealth
23 Electoral Act 1918 I do not consider that this subsection 14 limits an objection only to an
24 “theistic belief” based “religious objection” but in fact it also includes any secular belief based
25 “religious objection”, as it must be neutral to whatever a person uses as grounds for an
26 “objection”. This, as Section 116 of the Constitution prohibit the Commonwealth of Australia to
27 limit the scope of subsection 245(14) to only “theistic belief” based “religious objections”.
28 Therefore, any person having a purely moral, ethical, or philosophical source of “religious
29 objection” have a valid objection.
30 Neither do I accept that a person making an “religious objection” requires to state his/her
31 religion, and neither which part of his/her religion provides for a “religious objection” as the
32 mere claim itself is sufficient to constitute what is referred to in subsection 245(14) as being a
33 “religious objection”. Therefore, the wording “religious objection” is to be taken as “objection”
34 without the word “religion” having any special meaning in that regard.
35 If you do not accept this as such, then there is clearly another constitutional issue on foot!
36 I request you to respond as soon as possible and set out your position in this regard.
37
38 Awaiting your response, G. H. SCHOREL-HLAVKA
39 END QUOTE 4-6-2006 CORRESPONDENCE FAXED 10.36 pm 4-6-2006
40
41 QUOTE 7-6-2006 CORRESPONDENCE FAXED 7-6-2006
42 WITHOUT PREJUDICE
43 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
44 7-6-2006
45 C/o Judy McGillivray, lawyer
46 Melbourne Office, 22nd Floor, 2000 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000
47 GPO Box 21 A, Melbourne Vic 3001
48 Tel 03 9605 4333, Fax 03 9670 4295
49 ref; 02101199, etc
50
51
52 T01567737 & Q01897630
4-6-2025 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1 AND WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

2 Re; Charges, etc
3 Madam,
4 With proceedings due next month, I view it would be more appropriate if you were to make
5 some effort as to communicate with myself regarding matters relating to the charges and indeed
6 the legal justification of them. After all, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions may
7 be litigating against many people allegedly failing to vote, besides myself, and it may be born
8 out by my material that none of such litigation could be constitutionally valid. In my view, the
9 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions must consider ALL RELEVANT MATERIAL
10 as to ensure it is not pursuing vexatious charges.
11 I assume that while you are a lawyer, more then likely you are not a “constitutionalist”, and as
12 such may lack the experiences and competence to understand and comprehend the material I am
13 relying upon, and for this you may do better to perhaps seek to consult a “constitutionalist” who
14 is appropriately trained in these matters. After all, if a “constitutionalist” were to conclude that
15 indeed I am on the right track that the charges have no constitutional validity then you could
16 surely save the Courts time to hear and determine vexatious charges or even to try to attempt to
17 do so.
18 Albeit, I am still working on the DRAFT version of the ADDRESS TO THE COURT, it
19 nevertheless is already comprehensive and would indicate to a “constitutionalist” that the
20 charges are ill conceived and without any constitutional bases to proceed with, and as such I am
21 willing to provide an electronic copy to you of the DRAFT, albeit not completed, version so you
22 may perhaps seek advise of a “constitutionalist”.
23
24 Awaiting your response, G. H. SCHOREL-HLAVKA
25 END QUOTE 7-6-2006 CORRESPONDENCE FAXED 7-6-2006
26
27 Firstly, I do wish to quote Section 117 and then 116 of the Constitution, both being relevant;
28
29 117 Rights of residents in States
30 A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject
31 in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would
32 not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen
33 resident in such other State.
34
35 Despite this, the Defendant continues to find that he is excluded from accessing High Court of
36 Australia, Federal Court of Australia and other AuslII.edu files. This despite ongoing complaints
37 filed via the Victorian Government, High Court of Australia, Federal Court of Australia, etc.
38
39 It appears to the Defendant that this denial of access to judgments has been to try to limit the
40 Defendant to have relevant Authorities for litigation on foot.
41 After having filed a complaint via the Victorian Government then for about 2 weeks access was
42 enabled, only to be excluded again, as such, it is a deliberate conduct to prevent me to research
43 judgments on record so as to frustrate me in legal proceedings.
44 I view that this is in breach of Section 117 of the Constitution.
45 Because of this deliberate blockage to access Australian Authorities I am forced to rely often
46 upon US Authorities. In view that in the USA there is also a prohibition to legislate in regard of
47 religion then the equivalent Authority can be relied upon.
48
49 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
50 The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any
51 religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for
4-6-2025 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 11

1 prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test

2 shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust
3 under the Commonwealth.
4
5 As shown below in greater extend the question of the Defendants religion itself would be an
6 invasion as to his rights. Further, there is no requirement to state any particular religion as the
7 matter in U.S. Supreme Court.
8
9 116 Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion
10 The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any
11 religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for
12 prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test
13 shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust
14 under the Commonwealth.
15
16 WELSH v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 333 (1970), 398 U.S. 333, WELSH v. UNITED
17 STATES, CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
18 NINTH CIRCUIT, No. 76., Argued January 20, 1970, Decided June 15, 1970
19
20 1. The language of 6 (j) cannot be construed (as it was in United States v. Seeger, supra,
21 and as it is in the prevailing opinion) to exempt from military service all individuals who
22 in good faith oppose all war, it being clear from both the legislative history and textual
23 analysis of that provision that Congress used the words "by reason of religious training
24 and belief" to limit religion to its theistic sense and to confine it to formal, organized
25 worship or shared beliefs by a recognizable and cohesive group. Pp. 348-354.
26 2. The question of the constitutionality of 6 (j) cannot be avoided by a construction of
27 that provision that is contrary to its intended meaning. Pp. 354-356.
28 3. Section 6 (j) contravenes the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by
29 exempting those whose conscientious objection claims are founded on a theistic belief
30 while not exempting those whose claims are based on a secular belief. To comport with
31 that clause an exemption must be "neutral" and include those whose belief emanates from
32 a purely moral, ethical, or philosophical source. Pp. 356-361.
33 4. In view of the broad discretion conferred by the Act's severability clause and the
34 longstanding policy of exempting religious conscientious objectors, the Court, rather than
35 nullifying the exemption entirely, should extend its coverage to those like petitioner who
36 have been unconstitutionally excluded from its coverage. Pp. 361-367.
37
38 And;
39
40 http://www.vaccineinfo.net/exemptions/relexemptlet.shtml
41
42 Hints for Religious Exemptions to Immunization
43 Please read the text below before you download, print, or use the sample religious
44 exemption letter and support materials provided in the following link:
45
46 Sample Religious Exemption Letter and Supporting Documentation
47
48 Refer to the statutes. The laws require that immunization must conflict with the tenets and
49 practices of a recognized or organized religion of which you are an adherent or member.
50 However, the law does not require you to name a religion at all. In fact, disclosing
51 your religion could cause your religious exemption to be challenged.
4-6-2025 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 12

1
2 And
3 Some schools and daycares attempt to require you to give far more information than
4 required by law. You are not required by law to fill out any form letters from a school or
5 daycare. The law allows you to submit your own letter and the letter only needs to meet
6 the bare requirements of the law. Keep it simple; do not feel you need to describe your
7 religious beliefs here as that also is not required by law.
8 And
9 Many times, when a school or day care questions your exemption, they are merely
10 unfamiliar with the law or trying to coerce you to go against your beliefs by
11 deliberately misrepresenting the law. They are betting on the fact that you don't
12 know your rights.
13
14 What appears to be clear is that a “religious objection” is not qualified to a specific religion and
15 neither can be as this would in fact offend Section 116 of the Constitution. Neither can it be
16 associated with any particular religion as this would also interfere with Section 116 of the
17 Constitution. Likewise, any person objecting under the “religious objection” Subsection 245(14)
18 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 neither can be required to be a religious person as this
19 would also offend Section 116 of the Constitution, as the equivalent in WELSH v. UNITED
20 STATES, 398 U.S. 333 (1970), 398 U.S. 333 made clear that it (the “religious objection” applies
21 as much to non religious persons as religious persons. Therefore, anyone objection for his/her
22 personal reasons to vote clearly is entitled to do so regardless of having any specific religion
23 mentioned.
24 END QUOTE ADDRESS TO THE COURT County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
25
26 Yet, when it came to the fake covid-19 vaccinations then the people were coerced, etc, and
27 denied their constitutional rights big time to refuse to have the jab. Yet, where were the courts in
28 all that? It seemed to me we have numskulls/idiots/zombies/traitors, etc as judicial officers rather
29 than properly trained judicial officers!
30
31 HANSARD 22-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
32 Australasian Convention)
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. BARTON: Let this speech do for the referendum also.
35 Mr. TRENWITH: I say with these evidences of the desire on the part of the people
36 for more freedom, for greater facilities for giving effect to the popular will, we ought
37 to make provision in this Constitution by which the will of the people can become law.
38 If we do that we shall be doing something which will make it more certain that this
39 Constitution will be adopted by the people.
40 END QUOTE
41 .
42 Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
43 Australasian Convention),
44 QUOTE Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).-
45 Because, as has been said before, it is [start page 357] necessary not only that the
46 administration of justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be
47 beyond the possibility of suspicion;
48 END QUOTE
49
50 HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
51 QUOTE
52 Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the
53 rights of the Crown in prosecuting criminals are.
54 END QUOTE
4-6-2025 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 13

1
2 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
3 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
4
5 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
6 Australasian Convention)
7 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
8 for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual
9 citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and
10 secure to him.
11 END QUOTE
12 .
13 HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
14 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
15 The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its
16 Constitution,
17 END QUOTE
18 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
19 Australasian Convention)
20 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
21 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
22 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
23 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a
24 charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the
25 whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
26 END QUOTE
27 And
28 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
29 QUOTE
30 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
31 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
32 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
33 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
34 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
35 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
36 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
37 END QUOTE
38 And
39 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
40 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
41 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that
42 people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to
43 day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance
44 into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it
45 must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary
46 that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured.
47 It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse,
48 and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to
49 a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we
50 contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the
51 citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of
52 interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily
53 government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is
4-6-2025 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 14

1 the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution.

2 There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has
3 sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
4 popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and
5 I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a
6 free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty
7 of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as
8 the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine
9 questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should
10 be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all
11 courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not
12 provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the
13 will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution
14 shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court
15 appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a
16 perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It
17 is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the
18 Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose
19 of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and
20 the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
21 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
22 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
23 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
24 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it
25 gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
26 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such
27 a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
28 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
29 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided
30 for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
31 END QUOTE
32
33 Hansard 12-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
34 Australasian Convention)
35 QUOTE Mr. ADYE DOUGLAS:
36 It is to be hoped that when such a proposal goes before the home Government some objection will be taken
37 to it. I could understand that in dealing with foreign nations we should put duties upon their goods, and I
38 should expect that we ourselves should be treated by them in the same way; but when the mother country
39 takes all our productions without imposing the slightest duty it seems to me not a very generous proposal
40 that we should raise a barrier against the productions of the mother country and treat her as a foreign nation
41 That is very loyal indeed; in fact I am astonished at the loyalty of this Convention. I am not going to inflict
42 upon the Convention my opinions with respect to loyalty; but when I hear that we are to be deprived of the
43 Governor appointed by the Queen, that we are to abolish the power of veto, and that we are not to treat with
44 the mother country upon fair and equal terms as regards fiscal matters, I am inclined to ask what hon.
45 gentlemen think about their loyalty, and to say that their loyalty is a sham, and nothing else. How was I
46 treated the other day? When walking down Circular Quay, I happened to see some goods that were
47 imported, and some man said to me, "That is the effect of free-trade." I said, "I am a free-trader"; to which
48 he replied, "You ought to be shot down, and I would shoot you down if I had the opportunity. I am a
49 protectionist." Is that the sort of conduct we are to receive here because we have freedom of speech
50 and freedom of opinion? Are free-traders to be crushed down because-
51 END QUOTE
52
53 Hansard 5-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates
54 QUOTE Captain RUSSELL:

4-6-2025 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 15

1 It is a matter for social dealing. It is a matter with which men will deal rather through
2 municipalities than through a great federation in advancing, what I believe it is
3 necessary we should advance, the true liberties and freedom of the people.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution convention Debates
7 QUOTE
8 Mr. SYMON: We are the one country of freemen on the continent!
9 Mr. TRENWITH: I thank my hon. and learned friend for that term. There is one colony
10 of freemen on the continent. Why? Because every voter in South Australia has equal power
11 with every other voter. We are now going to create another form of citizenship, and we
12 must create it under conditions that will maintain freedom to the citizens of the
13 nation, as South Australia has obtained freedom for the citizens of the state. Therefore, I
14 am justified in saying that we have a right to consider the people of the larger states must
15 and will consider whether we shall hand to posterity a heritage of slavery or of freedom. If
16 we vote for equal power to every citizen, we shall be making free people of the future
17 Australians; if we vote for greater power for one citizen than for another, we shall be
18 putting chains upon the legs of the citizens in the larger states of this commonwealth.
19 END QUOTE
20
21 Hansard 9-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates
22 QUOTE Mr. FITZGERALD:
23 The people of Australia have stretched their limbs. They feel themselves animated by that
24 high spirit which characterised their ancestors. They feel within them that they are doing a
25 duty inspired by the same motives as those of their race before them. They know that men
26 of their race have fashioned and formed a large portion of the globe in a manner that
27 redounds to their honor and credit, and to the freedom of the world. They know that you
28 cannot advance this country without adding to the wealth, and the national importance, and
29 the power of that grand empire to which we belong, and they know that the expansion of
30 the empire means the happiness and the freedom of everybody who lives under the
31 protection of its flag.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution convention Debates
35 QUOTE
36 The Hon. J.H. HOWE: Not in the case of money bills. The power of the purse is the golden
37 key which rules everything and opens every door. We know that we have allowed these
38 things to be frittered away, and for the sake of federation and for the sake of entering into a
39 brotherhood we have actually departed from the first position which we took up. After we
40 have done that, some hon. members want to bring in these insidious amendments, so that
41 the states shall have no independent life. Since I joined this Convention in Adelaide, that
42 fair city of the south, where the people are as free as their air is pure, and whose
43 freedom I wish to maintain, I have undergone the difficult task of fighting an election.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates
47 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
48 Is it a Constitution which gives all reasonable and liberal guarantees of freedom? That can only be
49 answered in one way. Is it a Constitution the action of which, until amended by the people, is preserved and
50 safeguarded? There is only one answer to that. Is it a Constitution which the people themselves, by their
51 will expressed by their Parliament and themselves, are able to alter to suit their needs under conditions of
52 reasonable thought, without unreasonable difficulty? There can be no answer but one to. that question.
53 END QUOTE
54
55 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates
4-6-2025 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 16

1 QUOTE Mr. HOLDER.-

2 We know that it could never have been perfect by any possible contingency. But we may claim that it is
3 sufficiently perfect for a free and self-reliant people to live under its rule with their freedom
4 undiminished; and my answer to those who ask whether the Bill is acceptable in this light is this: When
5 we met in this Convention we entered upon a task in which we realized we should be untrue to the trust
6 reposed in us if we had not dealt with the matters which came before us with the sense of responsibility
7 resting upon every one of us that we were dealing with matters on behalf of independent and self-reliant
8 states.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution convention Debates
12 QUOTE Mr. MCMILLAN:
13 When a popular constituency fails to elect me I shall be no longer in public life, so I
14 am not afraid of the real public opinion; but I cannot forget that even in England, the
15 very home of constitutional freedom, the very cradle of our rights and liberties,
16 public opinion is often absolutely reversed in a few years. When I consider the
17 position we occupy, that our action will not be criticised by the mere ephemeral,
18 frothy views of certain people at the moment, but will be considered by the people of
19 this country through all time, I say that while I am willing to try to the utmost of my
20 knowledge and ability to gauge public opinion, while, I say, that if I knew thoroughly
21 what public opinion was on any question, I would bow to it; still, I believe that the
22 people of this country by the confidence they gave us practically instructed us to
23 make a constitution which would be not merely the outcome of a passing wave and
24 wind of opinion, but a constitution which we believe is based on principle, on the lines
25 of our own constitution, and which will stand the shock of time. I am quite willing, as
26 I said before, to leave to a certain extent this matter in the hands of the executive.
27 END QUOTE
28
29 Hansard 15-9-1897 Constitution convention Debates
30 QUOTE The Hon. J.H. HOWE:
31 . I remember once reading about an Irish deputation which waited upon one of their
32 representatives, and accused him of selling his country. Of course the incident that I am
33 relating refers to the time when Castlereagh and English gold deprived Ireland of its
34 parliament, and almost enslaved its people; and when the deputation waited on him, and
35 accused him of having done a certain thing to the horror of, the deputation, he went down
36 on his knees and thanked God that he had a country to sell. We who come from the other
37 colonies are not imbued with that idea. We are here to give that which is memory to the
38 vigorous life of a free people occupying the whole of Australia; but we are not in a
39 position, and we do not intend to give you that which belongs purely to the state. I say that
40 I would rather become a native of Japan, than remain the citizen of a small state that
41 yielded the powers that this Convention is trying to force from it. What would national
42 life be without freedom? We have done very well hitherto. Our colony is looked upon
43 as a small colony that is, so far as population is concerned; but we have done great
44 work with our population; we are a vigorous and a free people: we have undertaken
45 works of great magnitude; we have the intelligence and common-sense to know when
46 our rights are invaded, and we have the courage to try to maintain those rights.
47 However much, from our geographical position, we may desire federation, it must not be a
48 federation which will make us subservient to the larger colonies.
49 END QUOTE
50
51 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
52 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
53 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-
54 giving that people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their
4-6-2025 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 17

1 mercy from day to day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or
2 drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the
3 people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free Constitution.
4 Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which
5 the freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the
6 people, through their representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start
7 page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to a people
8 than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we
9 contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to
10 protect the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every
11 kind of interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily
12 government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom
13 is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution.
14 There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has
15 sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
16 popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain,
17 and I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way
18 for a free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the
19 duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only
20 act as the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will
21 determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions
22 which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court
23 of Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things,
24 have we not provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government
25 shall be by the will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that
26 the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted,
27 inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is
28 to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the
29 constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is
30 appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it;
31 but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of
32 the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become
33 the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I
34 mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any
35 Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow
36 degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in
37 operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be
38 maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here, which is to
39 be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will preserve
40 the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of
41 constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states
42 from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these
43 things, I think this Convention has done well.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 It must be very clear that the so-called federal legislation as to mis/disinformation is violating the
47 legal principles embedded in the constitution! By this the Victorian Police clearly violated the
48 rights of citizens to protest against the scam covid-19 MANDATES!
49
50 Despite the claims by many as I understand it this so-called SARS-CoV-2 (covid-19) virus
51 actually never has been proven to exist as it was never isolated and purified (Robert) Koch
4-6-2025 Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 18

1 postulate! As such, it is as elusive as the ‘Tooth Fairy’. Plenty of children grow up with the
2 fable of the ‘Tooth Fairy’ but that doesn’t mean it exist! Likewise so, with the purported “covid-
3 19 virus” as I extensively canvassed in my complaint to the Australian Federal Police!
4
5 QUOTE 20210824-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
6 Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-09-MURDER
7 https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/941509
8 How Do You Distinguish COVID-19 From Flu in Kids?
9 QUOTE
10 The CDC recommends testing to differentiate between symptoms of flu and COVID-19. Key
11 symptoms cited to be different between the two are the the presence of loss of taste or smell as
12 COVID-19 symptoms.
13 Table. Similarities and Differences Between Flu and COVID-19
Symptoms Flu COVID-19

Fever (or feeling feverish) ✓ ✓

Cough ✓ ✓

Shortness of breath/difficulty breathing ✓ ✓

Fatigue (tiredness) ✓ ✓

Sore throat ✓ ✓

Runny or stuffy nose ✓ ✓

Muscle pain or body aches ✓ ✓

Headaches ✓ ✓

Possible vomiting and diarrhea* ✓ ✓

Change in or loss of taste ✓

Change in or loss of smell ✓

14 *More common in children than adults.
15 CDC website.[3]
16 One key thing to note is that people with COVID-19 do not develop symptoms right away as
17 compared to those with the flu. Persons with the flu are contagious for about one day before they
18 show symptoms. In contrast, persons with COVID-19 may be contagious for a longer period of
19 time before showing symptoms.
20 Study Highlights
21 The study by Song and colleagues[2] compared children diagnosed with COVID-19 between
22 March and May with children diagnosed with flu between 2019 and 2020. All data came from
23 one major US children’s hospital.
24 The main study outcomes were children’s symptoms at presentation and the course of illness for
25 the two infections.

4-6-2025 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 19

1 Investigators compared 164 children who tested positive for COVID-19 with 1402 children who
2 had flu. The median ages of patients with COVID-19 and flu were 8.4 years and 3.9 years,
3 respectively, and there was a slight preponderance of males in both groups.
4 Researchers observed no significant difference in the rates of hospitalization (COVID-19: 17%;
5 flu: 21%); ICU admission (COVID-19: 6%; flu: 7%); or mechanical ventilation (COVID-19:
6 3%; flu: 2%) between groups.
7 No patient was found to have coinfection with both flu and COVID-19, at least in part because
8 of a sharp decline in cases of flu after schools closed on March 15, 2020.
9 Two patients with influenza A infection died. There were no deaths among patients with
10 influenza B or COVID-19.
11 Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were generally older than children hospitalized for flu
12 (median ages: 9.7 and 4.2 years, respectively). Adolescents older than age 15 years accounted
13 for 37% of hospitalized patients in the COVID-19 cohort.
14 Rates of underlying medical conditions among pediatric patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and
15 flu were 65% and 42%, respectively (OR = 2.6 [95% CI: 1.4, 4.7]). Neurological disease such as
16 epilepsy or developmental delay were the most common comorbid illnesses recorded.
17 Fever and cough were the most commonly reported symptoms among hospitalized patients in
18 both groups; however, fever, diarrhea/vomiting, headache, chest pain, and myalgia were more
19 commonly reported in cases of COVID-19 vs flu. This difference was significantly pronounced
20 in comparing COVID-19 and influenza A.
21 Rates of cough, sore throat, dyspnea, and congestion were similar in the flu and COVID-19
22 cohorts.
23 The CDC recommends testing to differentiate between symptoms of flu and COVID-19. Key
24 symptoms cited to be different between the two are the presence of loss of taste or smell as
25 COVID-19 symptoms.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 The above seems to indicate that the flu symptoms and the claimed COVID-19 symptoms are
29 identical other than for the loss of smell and/or taste. Then again prior to the claimed COVID-19
30 existing the loss of smell and/or taste was also contributed to:
31
32 https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/smell-and-taste-disorders
33 Smell and Taste Disorders | Johns Hopkins Medicine
34 Anosmia. Loss of sense of smell · Ageusia. Loss of sense of taste · Hyposmia. Reduced ability
35 to smell · Hypogeusia. Reduced ability to taste sweet, sour, bitter, ...
36 QUOTE
37 Smell and Taste Disorders
38 Ear Nose and Throat Pediatric ENT (Otolaryngology)
39 What are smell and taste disorders?
40 The most common smell and taste disorders are:
41 Anosmia. Loss of sense of smell
42 Ageusia. Loss of sense of taste
43 Hyposmia. Reduced ability to smell
44 Hypogeusia. Reduced ability to taste sweet, sour, bitter, or salty things
45 In other disorders, odors, tastes, or flavors may be misread or distorted. They may cause you to
46 detect a bad odor or taste from something that is normally pleasant to taste or smell. These
47 disorders can affect quality of life. They may also be a sign of underlying disease.
48 Problems with taste and smell can suggest certain health problems, such as:
49 Obesity
50 Diabetes
51 High blood pressure
52 Poor nutrition
4-6-2025 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 20

1 Nervous system diseases, such as:

2 Parkinson disease
3 Alzheimer disease
4 Multiple sclerosis
5 What causes smell and taste disorders?
6 Some people are born with these disorders, but most are caused by:
7 Illness (for example, cold or flu, sinus infection, and allergies)
8 Head injury
9 Hormone changes
10 Dental or mouth problems
11 Nasal polyps
12 Exposure to certain chemicals
13 Certain medicines
14 Exposure to radiation therapy for head or neck cancer
15 Cocaine snorted through the nose
16 Cigarette smoking
17 END QUOTE
18
19 Yes, pull the other leg will you!
20
21 It must be clear that a person loosing taste/small also can be simply by other ways, as there are
22 videos around, where a person was unable to say if he was tasting union or something else. As
23 such, a person could innocently not being able to taste and/or smell not because of an illness but
24 merely because of some co-incidence having say a blocked nose. And one can get a blocked
25 nose not merely due to some illness but merely working in dust.
26 END QUOTE 20250122-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Eloise O'Brien (WIC) & Ors - Case no 12210031872
27
28 https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=1301027&post_id=164442397&utm_source=post-email-
29 title&utm_campaign=email-post-
30 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo3NzI2NjI2NiwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTY0NDQyMzk3LCJp
31 YXQiOjE3NDgyMTY4MDksImV4cCI6MTc1MDgwODgwOSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTEzMDEwMjciLCJzdWIiOiJwb
32 3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.vvEEiPneSJcd5m4c_BKveL8RfelgZsBRDkbAMO4SOUM
33 QUOTE
34 THE LAST LIE NOW FULLY DEBUNKED
35 phillip.altman from phillip.altman’s Substack
36 From:[email protected]
37 To:[email protected]
38 Mon, 26 May at 9:46 am
39 THE LAST LIE NOW FULLY DEBUNKED
40 Millions were not saved by the Covid vaccines PLUS other important documents
41 PHILLIP.ALTMAN
42 MAY 25
43 For more than 5 years now we have been told nothing but lies about COVID and the
44 COVID so-called “vaccines”.
45 Share
46 I have now issued a total of 403 Substacks which provide comprehensive documentation of
47 the lies which include:
48 • the COVID virus was natural in origin and did not come from a lab
49 • the COVID “vaccines” prevent transmission of the virus
50 • the COVID “vaccines” prevent serious COVID-19 illness, keep you out of
51 hospital and protect from death
52 • the COVID “vaccines” protect those around you

4-6-2025 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 21

1 • scientific evidence shows lockdowns are effective in pandemics to prevent the

2 spread of disease and masks are effective in preventing transmission
3 • natural immunity is of no clinical significance in COVID-19
4 • the COVID “vaccines” have been fully tested and are “safe and effective”
5 • the COVID “vaccines” do not contain dangerous genetic material that can
6 permanently be integrated into your DNA
7 • there was no effective early treatment of COVID-19
8 • the COVID “vaccines” stay at the site of injection, do not distribute throughout
9 the body and thereafter do not linger in the body
10 etc etc etc
11 All these claims have been shown to be blatant lies. But one lie remains…..the claim that
12 millions of lives have been saved by the COVID “vaccines”. Various claims ranging from
13 3 to 7 to 14 to 20 million lives saved have been made. In the face of the known millions of
14 post-administration vaccine deaths and the persistent rise in cardiovascular, immunological
15 and cancer deaths around the world measured by the Excess Death rate (which only rose
16 following the release of these experimental gene-theapies) - this is probably the most
17 outrageous claim of all.
18 Now, an Australian has published a critical analysis of this last fraudulent claim and this
19 work is so important that it has been entered into the US Senate enquiry into COVID. See
20 Dr. Raphael Lataster’s Substack of of 22 May and Senator Johnson’s acknowledgement of
21 the importance of this work. CLICK HERE to view.
22 You will be hearing more from Raphael and myself on this issue due to its importance.
23 WITNESS STATEMENT
24 In case you may have missed it, please find below an important video exposing the COVID
25 crimes. View by accessing via the QR codes below. This documentary is very well
26 produced and must not be missed.
27 This was published on my Substack 29 January.
28 I encourage you to subscribe to Raphael’s Substack
29 CMNNews PRESS RELEASE:
30 Read full story
31 Thanks for reading phillip.altman’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and
32 support my work
33 DISCLAIMER:
34 The information and personal opinions presented in this Substack is based on or derived
35 from sources which I believe are credible and usually reliable. Any inadvertent errors or
36 inaccuracies in my Substacks which come to my notice will be corrected as soon as
37 possible. I endeavour to reference any relevant published information and provide links to
38 websites so readers can do their own research. The opinions expressed are not intended
39 nor should they be interpreted to be medical advice. I do not accept any liability for
40 comments placed on my Substack and my failure to respond to any potentially defamatory
41 or contentious comment should not be taken as passive or otherwise approval by myself. I
42 neither seek nor receive any financial compensation for my writings.
43 MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU
44 THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK.
45 END QUOTE
46
47 Let us not ignore what I stated above and repeat the same:
48
49 When I very successfully represented Mr Francis James Colosimo as to his alleged
50 “CONTEMPT OF COURT” for which he was placed under Orders of Administration” the
51 following is revealed as part of the transcript:
4-6-2025 Page 21 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 22

1
2 QUOTE Transcript 16 March 2009 before Her Honour Habrison J.
3 QUOTE Her Honour at page 21 line 30
4 Now, having heard that you can take a seat and I can have Mr Shorel-Hlavkia speak
5 on your behalf.
6 Mr Shorel-Hlavkia, what were the matters that you wanted to put?
7 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : First of all, I’m not a lawyer. I’ve no legal training. I’m a
8 constitutionalist. That means I deal with matters on constitutional matters mainly.
9
10 HER HONOUR : All right. Do you have some – you don’t have any legal training?
11 .
12 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : Absolutely not.
13
14 HER HONOUR : Do you have any qualification in what you say you are?
15
16 MR SHOREL-HLAVKIA : No, I have no – I am a constitutionalist, so I do assist with
17 parties – with barristers and everything else to assist them with legal work, you know,
18 constitutional matters and everything else, or the Government. You know, that’s
19 ongoing. I publish books about it under the Inspector (indistinct) at Trademark, they
20 are published and (indistinct).
21 END QUOTE Transcript 16 March 2009 Harbison J
22 END QUOTE
23
24 Meaning that I who migrated in 1971 from The Netherlands and didn’t command the English
25 language and had no former training in the English language, and rely upon my self-professed
26 “CRUMMY ENGLISH” nevertheless can leave those who claim to have qualification in legal
27 studies, etc, for dead!
28
29 As I proved in the 19 July 2006 AEC v Schorel-Hlavka case, and so unchallenged:
30
31 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
32 QUOTE
33 Mr. SYMON.-Very likely not. What I want to know is, if there is anybody who will
34 come under the operation of the law, so as to be a citizen of the Commonwealth, who
35 would not also be entitled to be a citizen of the state? There ought to be no opportunity for
36 such discrimination as would allow a section of a state to remain outside the pale of the
37 Commonwealth, except with regard to legislation as to aliens. Dual citizenship exists, but it
38 is not dual citizenship of persons, it is dual citizenship in each person. There may be two
39 men-Jones and Smith-in one state, both of whom are citizens of the state, but one only
40 is a citizen of the Commonwealth. That would not be the dual citizenship meant.
41 What is meant is a dual citizenship in Mr. Trenwith and myself. That is to say, I am a
42 citizen of the state and I am also a citizen of the Commonwealth; that is the dual
43 citizenship. That does not affect the operation of this clause at all. But if we introduce this
44 clause, it is open to the whole of the powerful criticism of Mr. O'Connor and those who say
45 that it is putting on the face of the Constitution an unnecessary provision, and one which
46 we do not expect will be exercised adversely or improperly, and, therefore, it is much
47 better to be left out. Let us, in dealing with this question, be as careful as we possibly, can
48 that we do not qualify the citizenship of this Commonwealth in any way or exclude
49 anybody [start page 1764] from it, and let us do that with precision and clearness. As a
50 citizen of a state I claim the right to be a citizen of the Commonwealth. I do not want
51 to place in the hands of the Commonwealth Parliament, however much I may be
52 prepared to trust it, the right of depriving me of citizenship. I put this only as an
4-6-2025 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 23

1 argument, because no one would anticipate such a thing, but the Commonwealth
2 Parliament might say that nobody possessed of less than £1,000 a year should be a citizen
3 of the Federation. You are putting that power in the hands of Parliament.
4 Mr. HIGGINS.-Why not?
5 Mr. SYMON.-I would not put such a power in the hands of any Parliament. We must
6 rest this Constitution on a foundation that we understand, and we mean that every
7 citizen of a state shall be a citizen of the Commonwealth, and that the Commonwealth
8 shall have no right to withdraw, qualify, or restrict those rights of citizenship, except
9 with regard to one particular set of people who are subject to disabilities, as aliens, and so
10 on.
11 END QUOTE
12 .
13 QUOTE Thomas Jefferson:
14 "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible
15 body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little
16 tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until
17 all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as
18 venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.".
19 END QUOTE
20
21 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
22 QUOTE
23 Dr. QUICK.-If we are to have a citizenship of the Commonwealth higher, more comprehensive, and nobler
24 than that of the states, I would ask why is it not implanted in the Constitution? Mr. Barton was not present
25 when I made my remarks in proposing the clause. I then-anticipated the point he has raised as to the position
26 we occupy as subjects of the British Empire. I took occasion to indicate that in creating a federal
27 citizenship, and in defining the qualifications of that federal citizenship, we were not in any way
28 interfering with our position as subjects of the British Empire. It would be beyond the scope of the
29 Constitution to do that. We might be citizens of a city, citizens of a colony, or citizens of a
30 Commonwealth, but we would still be, subjects of the Queen. I see therefore nothing unconstitutional,
31 nothing contrary to our instincts as British subjects, in proposing to place power in this Constitution to
32 enable the Federal Parliament to deal with the question of federal citizenship.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 As such, where the State of Victoria has no “citizenship” legislation then in real terms there are
36 no Victorian citizens and so no valid electors either. Moreover, no person can claim to be an
37 OFFICER OF THE COURT as Australian citizenship can only be AUTOMATICALLY
38 obtained by being a State citizen. And Australian citizenship has nothing to do with nationality
39 of a person but merely indicating the abode of the person. And as this was part of the AEC v
40 Schorel-Hlavka litigation on 19 July 2006 and neither the Commonwealth DPP and/or any or all
41 of the Attorney Generals challenged me on this then it is beyond the powers of any Government
42 and/or its entities to ever again challenge me on this.
43
44 The Commonwealth of Australia is not a “country” but no more but a “political union”.
45
46 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
47 QUOTE
48 Mr. SYMON ( South Australia ).-
49 In the preamble honorable members will find that what we desire to do is to unite in one
50 indissoluble Federal Commonwealth -that is the political Union-"under the Crown of the
51 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland , and under the Constitution hereby
52 established." Honorable members will therefore see that the application of the word
53 Commonwealth is to the political Union which is sought to be established. It is not
54 intended there to have any relation whatever to the name of the country or nation which we
4-6-2025 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 24

1 are going to create under that Union . The second part of the preamble goes on to say that it
2 is expedient to make provision for the admission of other colonies into the Commonwealth.
3 That is, for admission into this political Union, which is not a republic, which is not to
4 be called a dominion, kingdom, or empire, but is to be a Union by the name of
5 "Commonwealth," and I do not propose to interfere with that in the slightest degree.
6 END QUOTE
7
8 The Dutch claimed in 1658 the then known New Holland for the Dutch government. The Brits
9 never invaded New Holland at all, despite idiots claiming that 26 January was invasion day. The
10 Brits simply took over from the Dutch!
11
12 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Do+you+accept+that+Cap+C
13 ook+did+not+invade+"New+Holland"+as+it+was+already+claimed+by+the+Dutch%3F
14 QUOTE
15 Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already
16 claimed by the Dutch?
17
18 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
19 Answer:
20 No, Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was already claimed by the
21 Dutch.
22 The story of Lieutenant James Cook and British Sovereignty over Australia has been
23 somewhat misconstrued. While Cook did chart the east coast of New Holland (Australia)
24 in 1770 during his voyage, his primary mission was not to claim the land for Britain.
25 Cook’s initial objective was to reach Tahiti to study the Transit of Venus and then search
26 for the mythical Great Southern Land, Terra Australis.
27 When Cook was heading back after mapping New Zealand (Aotearoa), he intended to
28 return via Cape Horn in South America to potentially discover Terra Australis. However,
29 due to the condition of his ship, he decided to sail north along the east coast of New
30 Holland towards Batavia (Java) for repairs and supplies. Cook’s intention was not to
31 invade or claim New Holland but rather to navigate a route back home that would benefit
32 his mission.
33 Cook’s journal entries indicate that he consulted with his officers on the best route to take
34 for their return journey, ultimately deciding to sail west until they reached the East Coast
35 of New Holland and then follow its direction northward. The decision to explore parts of
36 New Holland was based on practical considerations and the need for provisions rather than
37 a deliberate invasion or claim of sovereignty.
38 Therefore, it can be concluded that Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it
39 was already claimed by the Dutch, and his exploration of the east coast of Australia was
40 part of a larger navigational journey rather than a conquest.
41 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
42 1. National Library of Australia
43 2. Australian National Maritime Museum
44 3. State Library of New South Wales
45 These sources provided historical records, journals, and archives related to Captain James
46 Cook’s voyages and explorations in Australia, offering valuable insights into the events
47 surrounding his navigation along the coast of New Holland.
48 END QUOTE
49
50

4-6-2025 Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 25

1 20240822-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to His Honour Chief Judge Peter Kidd

2 County Court of Victoria
3
4
5 Let us expose how the courts are failing miserably to provide for a true “impartial
6 administration of justice” as required by the Letters Patent, etc.
7 You can download the document from:
8 https://www.scribd.com/document/776248103/20241004-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
9 B-to-His-Honour-Chief-Judge-Peter-Kidd-County-Court-of-Victoria
10
11 I desire to call a spade a spade and dare to say “the King has no clothes” as to apply
12 to our purported “IMPARTIAL” administration of justice, that I view provide a
13 gross denial of justice for many!
14
15 https://www.scribd.com/document/776807670/20241006-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
16 B-to-His-Honour-Chief-Judge-Peter-Kidd-County-Court-of-Victoria
17
18 Despite my previous writings about “IMPARTIAL” administration of justice it
19 appears nothing was done to address the issues and well this document makes it clear
20 we have no lawful court system!
21 The document can be downloaded from:
22 https://www.scribd.com/document/804648090/20241214-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
23 B-to-His-Honour-Chief-Judge-Peter-Kidd-County-Court-of-Victoria
24
25 I encourage any victim of INJUSTICE to pursue their common law rights, as I do, to
26 pursue compensation.
27 The document can be downloaded from:
28 https://www.scribd.com/document/808453627/20241226-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
29 B-to-His-Honour-Chief-Judge-Peter-Kidd-County-Court-of-Victoria
30
31
32 So much more to state but as I made clear to former Kidd CJ I apply my common law
33 compensation claim for being denied my right to have a REASON OF JUDGMENT that set
34 out all issues which I raised before the Court and succeeded upon unchallenged!
35
36 Obviously, another problem is that the Commonwealth cannot pursue criminal charges within
37 the State of Victoria where no constitutional and/or Letters Patent valid (“IMPARTIAL
38 administration of justice”) State courts exist!
39 When will judicial officers be smart enough to communicate with me to address issues at hand?
40
41 As for being targeted in various ways now the Commonwealth as it appears to me seeking to
42 silence me had cut off my Age Pension payments and so backdated, as such preventing me to use
43 any Age Pension payments to purchase food, pay for medication, pay for medical cost, pay my
44 bills, etc.
45
46 Re 20250531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland -regarding THE
47 THEFT OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 14
48 Attorney-General Michelle Rowland 31-5-2025
49 Email [email protected],
50
51 Cc: Service Australian CUSTOMER.COMMENTS <[email protected]>
52 Centrelink Ref 301 602 799V Reply Paid 7800, CANBERRA BC ACT 2610
4-6-2025 Page 25 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 26

1
2 ROBODEBT 3
3 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
4 Re 20250531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland
5 -regarding THE THEFT OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 14
6 Michelle,
7 I rely upon my previous correspondences to the office of the Attorney-General as well to
8 other government entities, including those published at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.
9

10

11
12
13 It ought to be very clear that ANNUAL alleged income of $553.49 never could be something of
14 concern and as such the question should be why did Service Australia/Centrelink pursue me and
15 suspend my Age Pension when I am in a week to turn 78? Is it just a elaborate conspiracy that
16 eventuated to result in the suspension? Let us go into some details, etc.
17
18 QUOTE 20250524-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland -regarding THE
19 THEFT OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 13
20 There is a lot more to it but for the moment let us consider the above and deal with the
21 TRAITORS, TERRORIST, Fraudsters, imposters, etc.
22
23 Well Service Australia/Centrelink seemingly permitted by the Ministers are stealing my
24 Age Pension Payments rights which I view is part of the TERRORISM inflicted upon me
25 and my now Late wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel and I view so to say heads must roll and they
26 need all to be held legally accountable.
27 20250524-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland -regarding THE THEFT
28 OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 13
29 END QUOTE Re 20250531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland -
30 regarding THE THEFT OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 14
31
32 Despite that Service Australia/Centrelink unlawfully accessed my (now Late) wife Olga
33 Hlavka-Schorel private and confidential Estate details, at least as they claim them to be so, and
34 likewise my own, without lawful consent, somehow the failure of the Court to be the guardian of
35 the constitution is in my view the underlying problem why this is so much purpetrated upon the
36 many.
37
4-6-2025 Page 26 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 27

1 What we have is that the Commonwealth now sidelines the judiciary and unilaterally do
2 whatever it desires. And now instead of “INNOCENT until proven Guilty” they employ
3 “GUILTY until proven innocent”, as it knows the court no longer operate independently but so
4 to say do as they are told by their assumed MASTERS!
5 And this is precisely also how within State issues the purported government employs the tactic of
6 the same. While the constitution in Section 115 states “A State shall not coin money, nor make
7 anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.” Parking meters prevent
8 using gold and silver coins to be used. Banks unconstitutionally are not preventing cash
9 payments and by this violate constitutional provisions to pay gold and silver coins so a person
10 can use that to make payments using gold and silver coins!
11
12 Courts as a separate entity cannot be subjected to legislative demands and for example apply
13 GST yet does so.
14
15 With the unconstitutional “Infringement Notices” a person despite not been convicted then is
16 forced to pay additional charges when refusing to pay. The purported Infringement Court is
17 unconstitutional as well as violate the provisions of the Letters Patent and yet the purported
18 courts nevertheless will enforce any purported decision.
19
20 And then we are told by judicial officers that one has to obey the rule of law, where in fact it are
21 the judicial officers who fail to do so.
22
23 Probably the reason I have been able to detect so much what is being done wrong is because
24 unlike lawyers who I view have been in general brainwashed and go along with whatever I
25 instead questions matters! Meaning, we seem to have a real lack of competent lawyers/judicial
26 officers.
27
28 I discovered that a police officer may issue a so-called Infringement Notice say of exceeding 80
29 km/h limit driving 80 kilometres/hr and then unbeknown to the accused alter the copy filed with
30 the so called (unconstitutional Infringement Court) to be a speed of driving 100km/h. As such,
31 police unilaterally alter the copy, unbeknown to the accused. It really comes down to the
32 (PURPORTED) Courts to uphold the rule of law while claiming to do so!
33
34 When we have Attorney-Generals who seem to me to be incompetent as a First Law Officer then
35 this may underline how sick our legal system truly is.
36
37 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
38
39 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
40 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

42 (Our name is our motto!)

4-6-2025 Page 27 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati