Taskbased Language Teaching Daniel O Jackson download
Taskbased Language Teaching Daniel O Jackson download
download
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-language-teaching-daniel-
o-jackson-46371804
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-language-teaching-and-
assessment-n-p-sudharshana-46668062
Taskbased Language Teaching Theory And Practice Rod Ellis Peter Skehan
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-language-teaching-theory-and-
practice-rod-ellis-peter-skehan-36389696
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-language-teaching-in-foreign-
language-contexts-research-and-implementation-ali-shehadeh-christine-
a-coombe-4688974
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-language-teaching-nunan-
david-1851638
Contemporary Taskbased Language Teaching In Asia Contemporary Studies
In Linguistics Michael Thomas Hayo Reinders Editors
https://ebookbell.com/product/contemporary-taskbased-language-
teaching-in-asia-contemporary-studies-in-linguistics-michael-thomas-
hayo-reinders-editors-50219142
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-grammar-teaching-of-english-
where-cognitive-grammar-and-taskbased-language-teaching-meet-susanne-
niemeier-43026306
https://ebookbell.com/product/taskbased-approaches-to-teaching-and-
assessing-pragmatics-taskbased-language-teaching-naoko-taguchi-
editor-11134856
https://ebookbell.com/product/second-language-acquisition-and-
taskbased-language-teaching-1st-edition-mike-long-5246196
https://ebookbell.com/product/reflections-on-taskbased-language-
teaching-rod-ellis-51814722
Jackson
This Element is a guide to task-based language teaching
(TBLT), for language instructors, teacher educators, and other
interested parties. The Element first provides clear definitions
and principles related to communication task design. It
then explains how tasks can inform all stages of curriculum
development. Diverse, localized cases demonstrate the Language Teaching
scope of task-based approaches. Recent research illustrates
the impact of task design (complexity and mode) and task
implementation (preparation, interaction, and repetition)
on various second-language outcomes. The Element also
describes particular challenges and opportunities for teachers
using tasks. The epilogue considers the potential of TBLT to
Task-Based
Language
About the Series Series Editors
Teaching
This Elements series aims to close the gap Heath Rose
between researchers and practitioners by Linacre College,
Daniel O. Jackson
allying research with language teaching University of
practices, in its exploration of research- Oxford
informed teaching, and teaching- Jim McKinley
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE
TEACHING
Daniel O. Jackson
Kanda University of International Studies
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067973 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8EA, United Kingdom
One Liberty Plaza, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10006, USA
477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
314–321, 3rd Floor, Plot 3, Splendor Forum, Jasola District Centre,
New Delhi – 110025, India
103 Penang Road, #05–06/07, Visioncrest Commercial, Singapore 238467
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781009068413
DOI: 10.1017/9781009067973
© Daniel O. Jackson 2022
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions
of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take
place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
First published 2022
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
ISBN 978-1-009-06841-3 Paperback
ISSN 2632-4415 (online)
ISSN 2632-4407 (print)
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067973 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press & Assessment has no responsibility for the persistence
or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this
publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will
remain, accurate or appropriate.
Task-Based Language Teaching
DOI: 10.1017/9781009067973
First published online: September 2022
Daniel O. Jackson
Kanda University of International Studies
Author for correspondence: Daniel O. Jackson, [email protected]
1 What Is TBLT? 1
References 58
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067973 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Task-Based Language Teaching 1
1 What Is TBLT?
1.1 A Framework for Language Teaching
As an approach to communicative language teaching, task-based language
teaching (TBLT) originated in the mid-1980s. It has grown to become one
of the most widely recognized options for designing and implementing
language instruction today. As a field of academic inquiry, TBLT has
achieved a number of milestones, including the inauguration of the
International Conference on TBLT in 2005, since organized every two
years under the auspices of the International Association for Task-Based
Language Teaching (IATBLT), a book series published by John Benjamins
since 2009, and the launch of TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language
Teaching and Learning in 2021. In terms of its implementation, TBLT has
matured from an alternative approach to a mainstream educational policy
initiative encouraged or adopted in schools in Belgium, Hong Kong, and
New Zealand, among other regions. Increasingly, it is offered as a subject
in language teacher education programs, featured at teaching conferences
and in professional workshops, and is carried out by teachers with stu-
dents, during face-to-face or online lessons.
Thus, TBLT is a way of teaching languages and a robust area of inquiry.
In practice, language educators around the world use tasks to coherently
frame their teaching. This coherence can be seen from various perspec-
tives. First, ‘task’ provides a useful concept for framing the reasons why
languages are taught, what to teach (the particular content), and how to
teach (the classroom procedures). Second, in a practical sense, the litera-
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009067973 Published online by Cambridge University Press
ture on TBLT offers guidance on using the concept of task to link elements
of curriculum design such as materials, teaching, and testing. Lastly, and
most importantly, TBLT epitomizes the notion that classroom instruction
should be responsive to learners’ needs for using language in the real
world.
Tasks enable learners to acquire communicative abilities and to partici-
pate in social activities relevant to their present or future goals. There has
been much discussion and debate regarding the proposal that real-world
tasks should form the basis of language teaching, beginning with Long
(1985). The appeal of TBLT is that it seeks to identify and utilize activities
valued by learners as the impetus for curriculum development. How
the use of tasks facilitates acquisition of language and fosters participation
in society is a matter of considerable theoretical and practical interest. It
furthermore involves reconsideration of the teacher’s role, which in TBLT
2 Language Teaching
The present introductory section orients readers to TBLT and provides key
definitions and examples, as well as offering commentary on communication
task design. Section 2 guides readers through the familiar elements of
a language curriculum (needs analysis, sequencing of content, materials devel-
opment, teaching, testing, and evaluation) to illustrate how each can be
informed by tasks. Section 3 then adopts a case study approach to demonstrate
how teachers of diverse languages have found TBLT useful in their particular
contexts. The longest section of the Element is Section 4, which presents
a review of recent empirical studies divided into two distinct aspects that
concern practitioners: task design (i.e., complexity and modality) and task
implementation (i.e., preparation, interaction, and repetition). Section 5 then
provides an overview of some of the central issues faced by teachers in
understanding and using tasks. In the epilogue in Section 6, I offer a brief
critique of the potential of TBLT to bring about positive change in classrooms,
institutions, and societies. The Element concludes with an appendix of ques-
tions designed to facilitate discussion after each of the aforementioned sections
has been read.
Why use tasks in the first place? There are many answers, which will become
apparent throughout this text. In this opening section, the following rationales
will be presented. In short, among the clearest benefits of using tasks are that
they can be designed to offer students:
• practice to attain fluency and utilize specific features of language that may be
challenging to learn;
• choices regarding lesson content and procedures and thus more meaningful
and engaging learning experiences.
As described in this section, tasks are compatible with a wide range of teaching
approaches. Subsequently, from Section 2 onwards, further advantages gained
from entirely task-based approaches will be considered.
1.3 Definitions
There is a difference between target tasks, or real-world activities learners
ultimately aim to accomplish in their target language, and pedagogic tasks,
which are instructional activities derived from target tasks. During engagement
in pedagogic tasks, learners “use language, with an emphasis on meaning, to
attain an objective” (Bygate, Skehan, & Swain, 2001, p. 11). This basic
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
of animals the origin of their motive powers, and the comparison of
animals to thermic machines afterwards suggested to him the
important principle with which his name will remain for ever
connected.”
And the same laws that governed the formation of the earth,
governed also the formation of the moon: the variations of Nature’s
operations are quantitative only and not qualitative. The Divine Will
that made the earth made the moon also, and the means and mode
of working were the same for both. The geological phenomena of the
earth afford unmistakeable evidence of its original fluid or molten
condition, and the appearance of the moon is as unmistakeably that
of a body once in an igneous or molten state. The enigma of the
earth’s primary formation is solved by the application of the
dynamical theory of heat. By this theory the generation of cosmical
heat is removed from the quicksands of conjecture and established
upon the firm ground of direct calculation: for the absolute amount of
heat generated by the collision of a given amount of matter is (of
course, with some little uncertainty) deducible from a mathematical
formula. Mayer has computed the amount of heat that the matter of
the earth would have generated, if it had been formed originally of
only two parts drawn into collision by their mutual attraction, and has
[1]
found that it would be from 0 to 32,000 or 47,000 Centigrade
degrees, according as one part was infinitely small as compared with
the other, or as the two parts were of equal size. Professor
Helmholtz, another labourer in the same field of science, has
computed the amount of heat generated by the condensation of the
whole of the matter composing the solar system: this he finds would
be equivalent to the heat that would be required to raise the
temperature of a mass of water equal to the sum of the 17
masses of all the bodies of the system to 28,000,000 (twenty-
eight million) degrees of the Centigrade scale.
With the solidification of this external crust began the “year one” of
selenological history.
19
CHAPTER III.
THE SUBSEQUENT COOLING OF THE IGNEOUS BODY.
Now at this period of its formation, the moon’s mass, partly cooled
and solidified and partly molten, would be subject to the influence of
two powerful molecular forces: the first of these would consist in the
diminution of bulk or contraction of volume which accompanies the
cooling of solidified masses of previously molten substances; the
second would arise from a phenomenon which we may here observe
is by no means so generally known as from its importance it deserves
to be: and as we shall have frequent occasion to refer to it as one of
the chief agencies in producing the peculiar structural characteristics
of the moon’s surface, it may be well here to give a few examples of
its action, that our reference to it hereafter may be more clearly
understood.
22
Fig. 1.
Now if we carefully consider this peculiar action and seek a cause for
the phenomenon, we shall be led to the conclusion that it arises from
the expansion of that portion of the molten mass which is in contact
with or close proximity to the comparatively cool sides of the ladle,
which sides act as the chief agent in dispersing the heat of the
melted metal. The motion of the scoria betrays that of the fluid metal
beneath, and careful observation will show that the motion in
question is the result of an upward current of the metal around the
circumference of the ladle, as indicated by the arrows A, B, C in the
accompanying sectional drawing of the ladle (Fig. 2). The 23
upward current of the metal can actually be seen when
specially looked for, at the rim of the pot, where it is deflected into
the convergent horizontal direction and where it presents an
elevatory appearance as shown in the figure. It is difficult to assign to
this effect any other cause than that of an expansion and consequent
reduction of the specific gravity of the fluid metal in contact with or in
close proximity to the cooler sides of the pot, as, according to the
generally entertained idea that contraction universally accompanies
cooling, it would be impossible for the cooler to float on the hotter
metal, and the curious surface-currents above referred to would be in
contrary direction to that which they invariably take, i.e., they would
diverge from the centre instead of converging to it. The external
arrows in the figure represent the radiation of the heat from the
outer sides of the pot, which is the chief cause of cooling.
Fig. 2.
“I beg to inform you that cold slag floats in molten slag in the same
way cold iron floats in molten iron.
“I filled a box with hot molten slag run quickly from a blast furnace;
the box was about 5½ feet square by 2 feet deep, and I dropped into
the slag a piece of cold slag weighing 16 lbs., when it came to the
top in a second. I pushed it down to the bottom several times and it
always made its appearance at the top: indeed a small portion of it
remained above the molten slag.”
25
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
PLATE I.
CRATER OF VESUVIUS.
1865.
That an upheaving and ejective force has been in action with varying
intensity beneath the whole of the lunar surface is manifest from the
aspect of its structural details, and we are impressed with the
conviction that the principle we have set forth, namely the 28
paroxysms of expansion which successively occurred as
portions of its molten interior approached solidification, supply us
with a rational cause to which such vast ejective and upheaving
phenomena may be assigned. Many features of terrestrial geology
likewise require such an expansive force whereby to explain them;
we therefore venture to recommend this source and cause of ejective
action to the careful consideration of geologists.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
When the molten substratum had burst its confines, ejected its
superfluous matter, and produced the resulting volcanic features, it
would, after final solidification, resume the normal process of
contraction upon cooling, and so retreat or shrink away from the
external shell. Let us now consider what would be the result of this.
Evidently the external shell or crust would become relatively too large
to remain at all points in close contact with the subjacent matter. The
consequence of too large a solid shell having to accommodate itself
to a shrunken body underneath, is that the skin, so to term the outer
stratum of solid matter, becomes shrivelled up into alternate ridges
and depressions, or wrinkles. In its attempt to crush down and follow
the contracting substratum, it would have to displace the
superabundant or superfluous material of its former larger surface by
thrusting it (by the action of tangential force) into undulating ridges
as in Fig. 6, or broken elevated ridges as in Fig. 7, or 29
overlappings of the outer crust as in Fig. 8, or ridges capped by
more or less fluid molten matter extruded from beneath, as indicated
in Fig. 9, a class of action which might occur contemporaneously with
the elevation of the ridge or subsequently to its formation.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
31
CHAPTER IV.
THE FORM, MAGNITUDE, WEIGHT, AND DENSITY OF THE
LUNAR GLOBE.
We have not hitherto had occasion to refer to what we may term the
physical elements of the moon: by which we mean the various data
concerning form, size, weight, density, &c. of that body, derived from
observation and calculation. To this purpose, therefore, we will now
devote a few pages, confining ourselves to such matters as specially
bear upon the requirements of our subject, omitting such as are
irrelevant to our purpose, and touching but lightly upon such as are
commonly known, or are explained in ordinary elementary treatises
on astronomy.
First, then, as regards the form of the moon. The form of the lunar
disc, when fully illuminated, we perceive to be a perfect circle; that is
to say, the measured diameters in all directions are equal; and we are
therefore led to infer that the real form of the moon is that of a
perfect sphere. We know that the earth and the rest of the planets of
our system are spheroidal, or more or less flattened at the poles, and
we also know that this flattening is a consequence of axial rotation;
the extent of the flattening, or the oblateness of the spheroid,
depending upon the speed of that rotation. But in the case of the
moon the axial rotation is so slow that the flattening produced
thereby, although it must exist, is so slight as to be imperceptible to
our observation. We might therefore conclude that the moon is a
perfectly spherical body, did not theory step in to show us that there
is another cause by which its form is disturbed. Assuming the moon
to have been once in a fluid state, it is demonstrable that the
attraction of the earth would accumulate a mass of matter, like a tidal
elevation, in the direction of a line joining the centres of the two
bodies: and as a consequence, the real shape of the moon 32
must be an ellipsoid, or somewhat egg-shaped body, the major axis
of which is directed towards the earth. That some such phenomenon
has obtained is evident from the coincidence of the times of orbital
revolution and axial rotation of the lunar sphere. “It would be against
all probability,” says Laplace, “to suppose that these two motions had
been at their origin perfectly equal;” but it is sufficient that their
primitive difference was but small, in which case the constant
attraction by the earth of the protuberant part of the moon would
establish the equality which at present exists.
It is, however, sufficient for all purposes with which we are concerned
to regard the moon as a sphere, and the next point to be considered
is its size. To determine this, two data are necessary—its apparent or
angular diameter, and its distance from the earth. The first of these is
obtained by measuring the angle comprised between two lines
directed from the eye to two opposite “limbs” or edges of the moon.
If, for instance, we were to take a pair of compasses and, placing the
joint at the eye, open out the legs till the two points appear to touch
two opposite edges of the moon, the two legs would be inclined at an
angle which would represent the diameter of the moon, and this
angle we could measure by applying a divided arc or protractor to the
compasses. In practice this measurement is made by means of
telescopes attached to accurately divided circles; the difference
between the readings of the circle when the telescope is directed to
opposite limbs of the moon giving its angular diameter at the time of
the observation. But from the fact that the orbit of the moon is an
ellipse, it is evident that she is at some times much nearer to us than
at others, and, as a consequence, her apparent magnitude is
variable: there is also a slight variation depending upon the altitude
of the moon at the time of the measure; the mean diameter,
however, or the diameter at mean distance from the centre of the
earth has, from long course of observation, been found to be 31′ 9″.
Fig. 10.
There are yet two other methods: one depending upon the
phenomena of nutation, or the attraction of the sun and moon upon
the protruberant matter of the terrestrial spheroid; and the other
upon a displacement of the centre of gravity of the earth and moon,
which shows itself in observations of the sun. By each and all of
these methods has the lunar mass been at various times determined,
and it has been found, as the latest and best accepted value, that the
mass of the moon is one-eightieth that of the earth.
The cubical contents of a body compared with its weight gives us its
density. In the moon we have 5276 millions of cubic miles of matter,
the total weight of which is 73 trillions of tons. Now, 5276 millions of
cubic miles of water would weigh about 21½ trillions of tons; and as
this number is to 73 as 1 is to 3·4, it is clear that the density of the
lunar matter is 3·4 greater than water: and inasmuch as the earth is
5½ times denser than water, we see that the moon is about 0·62 as
dense as the earth, or that the material of the moon is lighter, bulk
for bulk, than the mean material of the terraqueous globe in the
proportion of 62 to 100, or, nearly, 6 to 10. This specific gravity of the
lunar material (3·4) we may remark is about the same as that of flint
glass or the diamond: and curiously enough it nearly coincides with
that of some of the aërolites that have from time to time fallen to the
earth; hence support has been claimed for the theory that these
bodies were originally fragments of lunar matter, probably ejected at
some time from the lunar volcanoes with such force as to propel
them so far within the sphere of the earth’s attraction that they have
ultimately been drawn to its surface.
Reverting, now, to the mass of the moon: we must bear in mind that
the mass or weight of a planetary body determines the weight of all
objects on its surface. What we call a pound on the earth, would not
be a pound on the moon; for the following reason:—When we say
that such and such an object weighs so much, we really mean 37
that it is attracted towards the earth with a certain force
depending upon its own weight. This attraction we call gravity; and
the falling of a weight to the earth is an example of the action of the
law of universal gravitation. The earth and the weight fall together—
or are held together if the weight is in contact with the earth—with a
force which depends directly upon the mass of the two, and upon the
distance between them. Newton proved that the attraction of a
sphere upon external objects is precisely as if the whole of its matter
were contained at its centre. So that the attractive force of the earth
upon a ton weight at its surface, is the attraction which 5842 trillions
of tons exert upon one ton situated 3956 miles (the radius of the
earth) distant. If the weight of the earth were only half the above
quantity, it is clear that the attraction would be only half what it is;
and hence the ton weight, being pulled by only half the force, would
only be equal to half a ton; that is to say, only half as much muscular
force (or any other force but gravity) would be required to lift it. It is
plain, therefore, that what weighs a pound on the earth could not
weigh a pound on the moon, which is only 1/80 of the weight of the
earth. What, then, is the relation between a pound on the earth and
the same mass of matter on the moon? It would seem, since the
moon’s mass is 1/80 of the earth, that the pound transported to the
moon ought to weigh the eightieth part of a pound there; and so it
would if the distance from the centre of the moon to its surface were
the same as the distance of the centre of the earth from its surface.
But the radius of the moon is only 1/3·665 that of the earth; and the
force of gravity varies inversely as the square of the distance
between the centres of the gravitating masses. So that the attraction
by the moon of a body at its surface, as compared with that of the
earth, is 1/80 multiplied by the square of 1/3·665; and this, worked
out, is equal to 1/6. The force of gravity upon the moon is, therefore,
1/6 of that on the earth; and hence a pound upon the earth would be
little more than 2½ ounces on the moon; and it follows as a
consequence that any force, such as muscular exertion, or the energy
of chemical, plutonic or explosive forces, would be six times more
effective upon the moon than upon the earth. A man who could jump
six feet from the earth, could with the same muscular effort 38
jump thirty-six feet from the moon; the explosive energy that
would project a body a mile above the earth would project a like
body six miles above the surface of the moon.
At the close of the preceding chapter we stated that any force acting
in opposition to that of gravity would be six times more effective on
the moon than on the earth. But, in fact, it would in many cases be
still more so; at all events, so far as projectile forces are concerned;
for the reason that “the powerful coercer of projectile range,” as the
earth’s atmosphere has been termed, has no counterpart, or at most
a very disproportionate one, upon the moon.
ebookbell.com