61_ISIJINT-2020-706
61_ISIJINT-2020-706
2143–2149
ISIJ International, Vol. 61 (2021), No. 7
https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2020-706
1) Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., 7-1-1 Omika-cho, Hitachi, Ibaraki, 319-1292 Japan.
2) Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan.
(Received on November 17, 2020; accepted on April 12, 2021)
The thermal shrinkage technique, which uses shrinkage strain to determine weld distortion, shows
promise as a simple simulation for predicting the weld distortion of large welded structures. To date, there
has not been adequate research on how to set input data based on welding conditions. In this work, we
perform a parametric study using thermal shrinkage technique in which we vary the input data to investi-
gate the optimum setting method. To compare angular distortion obtained by the thermal shrinkage tech-
nique, Metal active gas welding was conducted under five welding conditions and thermal elastic-plastic
analysis was conducted under the same welding condition. Under all five conditions, the angular distortion
obtained by the thermal shrinkage technique accurately reproduced that obtained by experiments and by
thermal elastic-plastic analysis. We found that the optimum input data settings were the shrinkage strain
of − 0.012 and a shrinkage zone in which the maximum temperature reached 500°C or more. From the
results, the similarity and the difference between the characteristics of angular distortion in the thermal
shrinkage technique and that in the thermal elastic-plastic analysis was discussed based on the inherent
strain and the moment. Moreover, the way in which inherent strain based on the both-ends-fixed-bar anal-
ogy occurred can explain the agreement in angular distortion in the case of the optimum input data set-
tings. Our results demonstrate that a suitable setting method of input data has been established.
KEY WORDS: thermal shrinkage technique; inherent strain method; thermal elastic-plastic analysis; weld
distortion; numerical simulation; finite element method; welding conditions.
© 2021 The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
CCBYNCND
5. Discussion
5.1. Mechanism Behind Angular Distortion
Next, in order to clarify the cause that the angular distor-
(a) I = 100 A, v = 3.33 mm/s tion obtained by the thermal shrinkage technique was in
good agreement with that obtained by experiments and the
thermal elastic-plastic analysis, we discuss here the inher-
ent strain distribution and the moment, which are dominant
factors of angular distortion.24) Here, the inherent strain,
which is derived by subtracting the elastic strain from the
apparent strain, is equal to the plastic strain perpendicular
to the welding direction. Figure 4 shows the inherent strain
(plastic strain) distributions under the welding condition
I = 200 A, v = 3.33 mm/s (the results under the other
four conditions showed the same tendency). As shown in
(b) I = 160 A, v = 3.33 mm/s
Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), there were significant differences in the
inherent strain distribution between the thermal shrinkage
technique and the thermal elastic-plastic analysis. In Fig.
4(a), tensile strain occurred at y = 10 mm in the thermal
shrinkage technique, whereas compressive strain occurred
from y = 0 to 10 mm in the thermal elastic-plastic analysis.
In Fig. 4(b), at about z = 3 mm, the inherent strain obtained
by the thermal elastic-plastic analysis was about twice as big
as that obtained by the thermal shrinkage technique. These 5.2. Theoretical Verification of Shrinkage Strain Set-
results demonstrate that the agreement in angular distortion ting
among the thermal shrinkage technique, the experiment, and To theoretically explain the agreement in angular distor-
thermal elastic-plastic analysis was not due to the inherent tion, here we discuss the generation characteristics of inher-
strain distribution. ent strain in the thermal shrinkage technique by means of
We next considered the moment as a possible cause of the a both-ends-fixed bar analogy.30) Specifically, we compare
agreement in angular distortion because the moment gener- the inherent strain based on the both-ends-fixed bar analogy
ated by the difference in shrinkage is known to be the driv- (hereinafter referred to as theoretical inherent strain) and
ing force of angular distortion. The schematic illustration of the inherent strain derived from the temperature distribu-
the moment is shown in Fig. 5. After welding, y-direction tion based on the thermal shrinkage technique (hereinafter
compressive plastic strain (inherent strain) remains near referred to as mean inherent strain).
the welded zone. This causes the plate to shrink in the First, we derived the theoretical inherent strain gy_s. In the
y-direction. When the shrinkage is unevenly distributed in both-ends-fixed bar analogy, the apparent strain ε is repre-
the plate thickness direction (z-direction), out-of-plane dis- sented by the following equation using the elastic strain εe
tortion, which is called angular distortion, is generated due and the plastic strain εp and the thermal strain εt.
to the moment based on the center of the plate thickness.
Generally, the moment M is represented by the following e p t ............................... (5)
equation using the load F and the distance from the center In the case where the shrinkage strain (εt = )αΔTs was given
of the plate thickness L.
M = FL .................................... (2)
The load F was calculated by the following equation using
the area A, Young’s modulus E, and strain in element (ε =
Δl/l).
F ( AE ) (l / l ) ............................. (3)
Here, since the element size (area A, element length l) and
Young’s modulus E are the same in both methods, the
shrinkage S( = Δl) is expressed by the following equation.
S ( l ) gi li ............................... (4)
(a) Evaluation line: plate surface
where li is a length of the element perpendicular to the weld-
ing direction and gi is the inherent strain in the element. We
compared shrinkage S in the thermal shrinkage technique
with that in the thermal elastic-plastic analysis (Fig. 6) and
found that it was about 10% to 20% larger in the former.
This explains why the angular distortion obtained by the
thermal shrinkage technique was about 10% to 20% larger
than that obtained by the thermal elastic-plastic analysis
(Fig. 3). This means that, even if we do not strictly repro-
duce an actual inherent strain distribution, the angular
distortion could be accurately predicted by reproducing a
moment. This indicates that the thermal shrinkage technique (b) Evaluation line: 3mm depth from plate surface
has potential as a useful tool in the simple numerical simula- Fig. 6. Comparison of shrinkage between thermal shrinkage
tion model of weld distortion. technique and thermal elastic-plastic analysis.
experiments to establish a method of setting data in the Weld., 58 (2020), 31 (in Japanese).
7) Y. Ueda and N. Ma: Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 11 (1993), 189 (in
thermal shrinkage technique. From the obtained results, Japanese).
the mechanism behind angular distortion obtained by the 8) Y. Fujita and T. Nomoto: J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 45 (1976), 22 (in
thermal shrinkage technique was discussed based on the Japanese).
9) S. Okano, M. Tanaka and M. Mochizuki: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join.,
inherent strain and the moment. In addition, the generation 16 (2011), 209.
characteristics of inherent strain in the thermal shrinkage 10) S. Okano, F. Miyasaka, M. Tanaka and M. Mochizuki: Q. J. Jpn.
Weld. Soc., 32 (2014), 276 (in Japanese).
technique using a both-ends-fixed bar analogy was dis- 11) S. Okano and M. Mochizuki: ISIJ Int., 57 (2017), 511.
cussed. Our main findings are as follows. 12) S. Brown and H. Song: Weld. J., 71 (1992), 55-s.
13) J. Goldak, M. Mocanita, V. Aldea, J. Zhou, D. Downey and D.
(1) We identified the optimum input data (ΔT = 1 000, Dorling: Proc. ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf., Vol. 410,
Ta = 500) for SM490YB in the thermal shrinkage technique ASME, New York, (2000), 21.
that can reproduce angular distortion obtained by experi- 14) K. Ikushima, S. Itoh and M. Shibahara: Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 31
(2013), 23 (in Japanese).
ments under five welding conditions. 15) K. Ikushima and M. Shibahara: J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 141
(2) From the discussion of the inherent strain distribu- (2019), 021603.
16) K. Jackson and R. Darlington: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 26
tion and the moment, we clarified that even if we do not (2011), 012018.
strictly reproduce an actual inherent strain distribution, the 17) H. Murakami, T. Terasaki, K. Miyazaki, Y. Maeda, S. Okano and M.
angular distortion could be accurately predicted by repro- Mochizuki: J. High Press. Inst. Jpn., 58 (2020), 93 (in Japanese).
18) D. Deng, H. Murakawa and N. Ma: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 17
ducing a moment. (2012), 13.
(3) In the case of the optimum input data settings of 19) J. Wang, S. Rashed, H. Murakawa and Y. Luo: Mar. Struct., 34
(2013), 135.
the thermal shrinkage technique, the occurrence of inherent 20) O. Gupta: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 23 (2018), 428.
strain based on the both-ends-fixed-bar analogy explained 21) N. Ma, J. Tateishi, S. Hiroi, A. Kunugi and H. Huang: Q. J. Jpn.
the agreement in angular distortion among the thermal Weld. Soc., 35 (2017), 137s (in Japanese).
22) A. Honaryar, M. Iranmaesh, P. Liu and A. Honaryar: Ocean Eng.,
shrinkage technique, the thermal elastic-plastic analysis, and 200 (2020), 106976.
the experiments. 23) H. Murakawa, Y. Luo and Y. Ueda: J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn., 1996
(1996), No. 180, 739 (in Japanese).
24) M. Mochizuki and S. Okano: Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., 82 (2016),
REFERENCES 15-00567 (in Japanese).
25) S. Okano, K. Matsushita, M. Mochizuki, M. Toyoda and T. Ueyama:
1) T. Miyata: J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 52 (1983), 606 (in Japanese). Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 28 (2010), 97 (in Japanese).
2) T. Yamakawa: J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 67 (1998), 121 (in Japanese). 26) M. Hermans and G. den Ouden: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 3 (1998),
3) P. Michaleris: Minimization of Welding Distortion and Buckling: 135.
Modelling and Implementation, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 27) Y. Tsujimura and M. Tanaka: Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 30 (2012), 68
Cambridge, UK, (2011), 1. (in Japanese).
4) T. Gray, D. Camilleri and N. McPherson: Control of Welding Distor- 28) F. Miyasaka, Y. Yamane and T. Ohji: Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 22
tion in Thin-Plate Fabrication: Design Support Exploiting Computa- (2004), 487 (in Japanese).
tional Simulation, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, 29) M. Mochizuki and S. Okano: ISIJ Int., 58 (2018), 153.
(2014), 1. 30) K. Satoh and T. Ohnishi: J. Jpn. Weld. Soc., 38 (1969), 359 (in
5) S. Okano and M. Mochizuki: ISIJ Int., 56 (2016), 647. Japanese).
6) M. Tsunori, M. Mouri, S. Sasou and H. Kusumoto: J. Light Met.