0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

Rc Tiebeam

The document outlines the design and analysis of a beam according to NSCP 2015 and ACI 318-19 standards, confirming that the design is safe. It includes detailed input data such as material properties, beam dimensions, reinforcement ratios, and shear analysis. The calculations demonstrate that the beam meets the required strength and stability criteria for its intended use.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

Rc Tiebeam

The document outlines the design and analysis of a beam according to NSCP 2015 and ACI 318-19 standards, confirming that the design is safe. It includes detailed input data such as material properties, beam dimensions, reinforcement ratios, and shear analysis. The calculations demonstrate that the beam meets the required strength and stability criteria for its intended use.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

BEAM DESIGNING AND ANALYSIS

Reference Code : NSCP 2015 - 2nd Printing, ACI 318-19


DESIGN STATUS : Safe!
Input Data
A. Material Properties and Design Information
Beam Length ℓ= 5.65 m
Yield Strength of Non-Prestressed Reinforcements fy = 414 Mpa
Yield Strength of of Traverse Reinforcements fyt = 276 Mpa
Compressive Strength of Concrete f'c = 20.7 MPa
Beam Height to Beam Width Ratio h/b = 1.5
Distance from Extreme Compression Fiber to Centroid of
d' = 58 mm
Compression Reinforcement
Stirrup Type 2 - Legged
STAAD Inputs Ultimate Moment Demand MuD = 674.821 kN - m
Shear at Critical Distance VuCritical = 319.823 kN
Diameter of Stirrup Bars ds = 10 mm
Diameter of Main Reinforcement db = 16 mm

B. NSCP 2015 Criterias


Support Condition Cantilever
Table 409.3.1.1 Minimum Depth of Beam d= ℓn/706.25 706.25
=𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡/(𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚
Minimum Width b= 𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ)

Minimum Width 471 mm


STAAD Inputs Proposed Beam Height h= 600 mm

h − (db/2)− ds−cc
STAAD Inputs Proposed Beam Width b= 400 mm

Proposed Depth d= = 542.00 mm

420.6.1.3 Concrete Cover to Steel Reinforcment cc = 40 mm


422.2.2.4.3 Beta Factor β1 = 0.85
{█(0.85 𝑓𝑜𝑟 17≤𝑓𝑐′≤[email protected]−(0.05−(𝑓𝑐^′−28))/7
𝑓𝑜𝑟 28<𝑓𝑐^′<[email protected] 𝑓𝑜𝑟 55≤𝑓𝑐′)┤
β1 =

(𝑀𝑢 𝑥 10^6
Rn = )/Ø𝑏𝑑2
ACI 318-19: 9.3.3.1

{█(1.4/𝑓𝑦 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑐
Rn = 6.38

′≤31.36@(√(𝑓𝑐′)
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑐
= 0.0034
409.6.1.2 Lower Limit of the Reinforcement Ratio ρMin = )/4𝑓𝑦
′≥31.36)┤
= 0.0027

3/7((0.85
409.6.1.2 Lower Limit of the Reinforcement Ratio ρMin = 0.0034

fc′β)/fy)
Upper Limit of the Reinforcement Ratio ρMax = = 0.0155

(0.85 f′c)/fy
[1−√(1−2𝑅𝑛/(0.85 f^′ c)) ]
Actual Reinforcement Ratio ρactual = = 0.0202

{█(𝜌𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙< 𝜌𝑀𝑖𝑛 ;𝜌= 𝜌𝑀𝑖𝑛 @𝜌𝑀𝑖𝑛<


;𝜌= 𝜌𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 @𝜌𝑀𝑎𝑥< 𝜌𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
𝜌= 𝜌𝑀𝑎𝑥 )┤
ρ = ;𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑥
𝜌 <𝜌
Use Reinforcement Ratio = 0.0155

DOUBLY DESIGN

{█(𝑖𝑓
Area of Nonprestressed Longitudinal Tension Reinforcement As = ρbd = 3356.53 mm2

𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑦;𝐴𝑆′=𝐴𝑆/2@𝑖𝑓
As' = 𝐷𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑦;𝐴𝑆′=𝑀𝑛2/(𝑓𝑦(
𝑑 −𝑑′)))┤
Area of Compression Reinforcement = 667.84 mm2

Asfy(d−a/2)
a 197
422.2.1 Nominal Flexural Strength at Tension Side Mn1 = = 615.98 kN - m

Demand)/Ø−Mn
(Mu

1
422.2.1 Nominal Flexural Strength at Compression Side if Doubly; Mn2 = = 133.82 kN - m
4
No. of Recommended Compression Bars 4
No. of Recommended Tension Bars 17
Tension Bars 17 pcs.
Compression Bars 9 pcs.
As = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚
Analysis

𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑥 𝑑𝑏
Area of Nonprestressed Longitudinal Tension Reinforcement = 3419 mm2
ρ =𝐴𝑠/𝑏𝑑 = 0.0158

A's = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑜𝑝 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑥


ρ max = 0.015

𝑑𝑏
Area of Compression Reinforcement = 1810 mm2
422.2.2.4.1 Distance from Extreme Compression Fiber to Neutral axis c = 0.85f'c ab + A'sfy = 111.349 mm
422.2.2.4.1 Depth of Equivalent Rectangular Stress Block a= β1c = 95 mm
600/𝑐
Tensile Stress in Reinforcement fs = (𝑑−𝑐) = 2320.53 N/mm2 fs Yields
600/𝑐
(𝑐−𝑑′)
Compressive Stress in Reinforcement fs' = = 287.47 N/mm2 fs' Does Not Yield

fs Yields, fs' Does Not Formula 1604286 Value Must Be 1415466


c 154.69846985
a 131.493699372
Mu Capacity 692.374738488
fs 1502.15395353

N/A 419.983360022

N/A 495.923245463

421.2.2 Strength Reduction Factor Ø= 0.9

Singly 630.17795260588 3532.24559432 630.177952605882


Doubly 692.37473848828

409.5.1.1 692.37 ≥ 674.82 Safe!


Mu Capacity Mu Demand

Utilization Ratio 0.975


SHEAR ANALYSIS

0.17ʎ√(𝑓^′
Shear at Critical Distance VuCritical = 319.82 kN

𝑐)bd
422.5.5.1 Vc =
Vc = 167.68 kN
421.2.1 Strength Reduction Factors Ø= 0.75
ØVc = 125.76 kN
0.5ØVc = 62.88 kN
409.6.3.1 Condition = Stirrups Needed

422.5.10.1 Vs = Vu/Ø - Vc
L/2 = 2.825 m Vs = 258.75 kN

0.67√(𝑓^′
𝑐)bd
VsMax =
Shear Diagram Along L/2 VsMax = 660.87 kN
Cross Section is Adequate

0.33√(𝑓^′
350
Vu; 319.82
𝑐)bd
300 VsMax =
Vu = 319.82 VsMax = 325.51 kN
250 d or 300
0.5ØVc = 62.88 SMax = 2
Shear (kN)

200
= 271 or 300
SMax = 275 mm
(𝐴𝑣 𝑓𝑦 𝑑)/𝑉𝑠
150 ØVc; 125.76
100
S=
0.5ØVc, [Y S= 90.81 mm
50 VALUE] Say S = 90.81437825 mm
0.062√(𝑓^′ 𝑐)
AvMin = 𝑏/𝑓𝑦 𝑠
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Half Length of the Beam Span AvMin = 25.15 mm
Av = 157.08 mm
Stirrup Diameter is Adequate
Stirrup Spacing after Critical Region:

Vu Respect to S
Vu Actual Number of Stirrups Vs From Support Distance Distance
478.23 314.16 1 @50 50.00 469.96 -1.40 0.00 0.050 0.05
360.74 314.16 @75 75.00 313.30 -0.36 0.00 0.050 0.05
302.00 257.55 5 ADD MORE BARS 100.00 234.98 0.16 2.67 0.550 0.55
266.75 257.55 @125 125.00 187.98 0.47 2.36 0.550 0.55
243.25 2.83 15 ADD MORE BARS 150.00 156.65 0.68 2.15 2.800 2.80
226.47 2.83 @175 175.00 134.27 0.82 2.00 2.800 2.80
Done

1@50 @75 5ADD MORE BARS @125 15ADD MORE BARS@175

You might also like