Topic. Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news.

However, others
believe that they can learn news better through other media. Dicuss both views and give your
opinion
People have divergent views regarding whether newspapers are the best way to learn news or
not. While the school of thought holds the opinion that the most effective way to learn news is
reading newspapers, another claims that other media can offer better ways. Personally, I side
with the latter idea.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the view that
newspapers are the best way to learn news. Chief among these is that they are a source of
trustworthy information. Clearly, the content included in newspapers are fact-checked thoroughly
by a qualified editorial team before being published. Another reason worth mentioning is reading
newspapers is a habit of the elder as well as businessmen for a long time. They are intimidated to
change or quit that habit. Moreover, some people believe that learning news by reading
newspapers instead of using media is a great way to protect their eyes, avoid several diseases like
myopia.
Irrespective of aforementioned line of reasoning, I am convinced that it is much better to believe
that people can learn news better through other media. With the invention of the Internet, the
traditional printed press is no longer popular. As a result, newspapers are eventually replaced by
other forms like audio. People can easily update information immediately only by accessing to
social platforms. An added supporting argument to this is that an abundant of information related
to numerous aspects is arranged systematically. It can offer readers a great opportunity to get any
topics in easier way
In conclusion, while there are some sufficient justifications to support the view that whether
newspapers are the best way to learn news, it is my firm conviction that other media can offer
better ways.
Topic. Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful
career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views
and give your opinion
People have divergent views regarding whether studying at university or college is the best route
to a successful career or not. While the school of thought holds the opinion that the effective way
to succeed is studying at university or college, another claims that it is better to get a job straight
after school. Personally, I side with the former idea.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the view that getting a
job straight after school is the best way. Chief among these is that it allows people to make
money. As a result, it can offer them a chance to reduce financial burdens their families and buy
a house, a car or even get married early. Another reason worth mentioning here is some people
believe that going to work is the best way to get experience and gain various crucial social skills
such as communication, presentation. Hence, they may get a promotion in their career, which can
be a valuable opportunity to achieve the success in their life.
Irrespective of aforementioned line of reasoning, I am convinced that it is much better to believe
that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career for people. One of
the primary reason is going to universities can offer them a chance to gain an academic
qualification. For example, it is impossible to become a teacher, a doctor, a lawyer without
having the relevant degree. As a result, they can have an opportunity to find substainable jobs
with high salaries. Another argument supporting to the ideal is fortified by the fact that the job
market is more challenging. If young people do not have any qualifications, they may find
difficulty in finding a proper job leading to bad effects on their lives.
In conclusion, while there are some sufficient justifications to support the view that it is better to
get a job straight after school, it is my firm conviction that studying at university or college is the
best route to a successful career for people.
Topic. When students finish school, they find themselves in an embarrassing situation of whether
to get a job or continue their education?
People have divergent views regarding whether students should get a job or continue their
education after finishing school. There is indeed a strong case to be made for both sides of the
debate, which will be discussed now.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the view that finding a
job after finishing school has a significant impact on students. Chief among these is that it can
offer them a chance to make money. As a result, they can support their families, buy a house, a
car or even get married early. An added advantage worth mentioning is that students can have an
opportunity to get experience and learn various crucial social skills such as communication,
management. Recent surveys have shown that these skills they gain from their jobs are one of the
important foundations to achieve their success faster.
Irrespective of the aforementioned line of reasoning, I would argue that it is much better to
believe that students should continue their education. The first key reason is that it can offer them
a chance to gain a better academic qualification. Nowadays, it is impossible to become a doctor,
a teacher or a lawyer without a relevant degree. As a result, a good qualification can allow them
to find a sustainable job with higher salaries. Another argument supporting to the view is
fortified by the fact that the job market is more challenging. If students do not have any
qualifications and are not trained systematically to cope with complex situations in their jobs,
they may face feelings of stress, depression, which can negatively affect their mental health and
hinder their career in the future.
In conclusion, while there are some sufficient justifications to support the idea that students
should get a job after finishing school. It is my firm conviction that continuing their education
offers more significant merits.
Topic. Some people are proposed that art is a necessary subject for children at school while
others think it is a waste of time for them to study. So they should focus study maths or a
language. Discuss both views and give your opinion
People have divergent views regarding whether children should learn art at school or other
subjects. While a school of thought holds that art plays a crucial part at school, another claims
that it is better for children to center on maths or a language instead of wasting time to that
subject. This essay will explore the argument on both sides before arriving at a reasoned
conclusion.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the idea that learning
subjects like maths or a language has a significant impact on children. Chief among these is that
it can offer them a chance to enhance various skills such as problem-solving, logical-thinking.
For example, when children solve an exercise related to maths, they have to think carefully, show
evidence and draw conclusions. This can help to stimulate their brain developments. An added
advantage worth mentioning is that those who are good at these core subjects can enter lots of
top schools and universities. As a result, they can have better job opportunities leading to high
salaries and a sustainable life.
Irrespective of the aforementioned line of reasoning, I am convinced that it is much better to
believe that art is an important subject for children at school. The key reason is that it can offer
them a chance to reduce stress. Clearly, listening to music, singing songs or drawing is a great
way for them to recharge their batteries and refresh their minds after hard-working hours.
Another argument supporting to the idea is fortified by the fact that it can help to stimulate their
creativity and imagination. Learning art can bring an opportunity to explore their talent and help
them become more well-rounded individuals
In conclusion, while there are some sufficient justifications to support the idea that children
should concentrate on maths or a language, I would contend that art is of no less significance.
Topic. Some people believe that traveling alone is the best way to experience a country or a
culture). Others feel that it is better to travel with people(family/ friends) you know (because we
can share costs, food and drink together in the long journey). Which one do you prefer? State
your own opinion
People have divergent views with regard to whether they should travel alone or travel with
others. While a school of thought holds that the greatest way to explore a country or a culture is
traveling alone, another claims that traveling with other people can offer more significant merits.
From my perspective, I lean towards the latter idea.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the view that traveling
alone has a significant impact on people. Chief among these is that they may have the feeling of
comfort and independence. Clearly, traveling alone can offer them more space to do whatever
they want without being bothered by others. An added advantage worth mentioning is that people
can have a great opportunity to learn various crucial skills such as problem-solving, time
management, self-control and so on. This is a testament why people choose traveling alone
instead of traveling with others.
Irrespective of the aforementioned line of reasoning, I am convinced that it is much better to
believe that traveling with people confers more significant merits. The key reason is that it can
allow them to save a huge amount of money. This is because when they are in the long journey,
they often share fees such as transportation, accommodation and meals with others. An added
argument supporting to the view is fortified by the fact that it can offer them a chance to connect
with many people. It is a great time for them to save memorable moments and create long-lasting
relationships.
In conclusion, why there are some sufficient justifications to support the idea that travelling
alone is the best way to explore a country as well as a culture, it is my conviction that traveling
with others can offer more significant experiences.
Topic. These days, many people think that eating at a restaurant is convenient and luxurious in
modern life. However, others think eating at home is more comfortable than eating out by its
meaning. Which opinion do you agree with?
People have divergent views regarding whether they should eat at restaurant or eating at home.
While a school of thought holds that eating at a restaurant is convenient and luxurious, another
claims that eating at home can offer more significant merits like the feelings of comfort. From
my perspective, I lean towards the latter idea.
On the one hand, it is seemingly comprehensible why some subscribe to the view that eating at
restaurant has a significant impact on people. Chief among these is its convenience. Nowadays,
people who are occupied with their work, hardly have time to prepare their meals at home. As a
result, they choose to eat at a restaurant as the best way to save time. An added advantage worth
mentioning is that it can offer them a chance to experience various cuisines. This is because
restaurants contain numerous delectable dishes, ranging from fast food to seafoods. As a result,
people can enjoy these meals without wasting time to prepareing ingredients to cook.
Irrespective of the aforementioned line of reasoning, I am convinced that it is much better to
believe that eating at home confers more significant merits. The key reason is that it is more
comfortable than eating out. People who are introverts often have a special liking for preparing
their meals at home because they prefer to avoid and distractions of public places. Another
argument supporting to the view is fortified by the fact that it can offer them a chance to save
money. Some people claim that preparing their meals at home can save a huge of amount money
and reduce their financial burdens because they can select ingredients that are safe and
reasonable priced.
In conclusion, there are some sufficient justifications to support the view that eating at a
restaurant is more convenient, it is my firm conviction that eating at home can offer more
significant benefits.