02
02
> do and dA = rdOdr as shown in Figure 2.20.
Substituting Eq. (2.4.20) into Eq. (2.4.21), we have
Looper R
a ~ =n wf a\(r)rdr
f ° (2 = 10K st)Section 2.4 LARGE-SCALE PATH LOSS AND SHADOWING _ 59
Figure 2.20 The cell coverage area
where
with
é 10k logio(R/do)
%
an 10K I
‘ loBi0
%
As a result,
1 en, ]
dt | xdx
= flae Lom
atbiniR/ds) 4 1 thes
=2 : = [ xdx eT Padt
5 Var | Jexwi%=
* Love 7 owt]
-8-(9) ao+0n(8)
-oo(22)[o(e+3) ef beoe(S))
If do & R, we have
wc on(25¢4)[o(er2)-o(-+ eo(2)))60 Chapter 2 _ Characterization of the Wireless Channel
Given the required a2 value, the cell radius R can be determined numerically from the
above equations.
2.5 SMALL-SCALE MULTIPATH FADING
2.5.1 First-Order Statistics
‘Suppose the multipath channel is characterized by N distinct scatterers in which the nth scatterer
is associated with a gain aq(t) and a delay r,(t), where n = 1,2,...,.V. Consider digital
transmission over the channel at the carrier frequency fc with a symbol interval much larger
than the channel multipath delay spread. From Eq. (2.2.2), the received signal at baseband, in the
absence of background noise, is
N
1) = Doan tye PF (0 — m9)
nal m
Ny
® Yaane ee] -i).
=
‘The approximation is reasonable as long as the delay spread is much smaller than the symbol
interval. The complex gain of the channel is Z(t) = SV _jaq(t)e~/2*/e%(, Let Z(t) and
~Z,(t) denote the real and imaginary components of the complex channel gain, respectively, so
that Z(t) = Ze(1) — jZ,(1). Then
i
Z(t) = Y an(t) cos Ont)
@n(t) sin By (0),
where 6,(t) = 2m fetn(t)-
Furthermore. let
a(t) = (22) + 220), 8) tan Z, (0)/Z-0))
be the amplitude fading and carrier distortion introduced by the channel. The fading characteristics
can be studied by examining the pdfs of the envelope a(r) and phase 6(¢) at any time 1. The
fading characteristics depend on whether the transmitter and receiver are in line-of-sight or not
in line-of-sight. The former case is called LOS scattering while the latter case is referred to as
NLOS scattering. LOS seattering has a specular component (from the direct path), and can be
modeled as a Rician distribution. NLOS scattering does not have a specular component, and can
be modeled as a Rayleigh distribution. A pictorial view of LOS and NLOS scattering is depicted
in Figure 2.21.Section 2.5 SMALL-SCALE MULTIPATH FADING 61
NLOS path.
‘Transmitter Receiver
Figure 2.21 NLOS versus LOS scattering.
Rayleigh Fading (NLOS propagation). In this case,
E(Z-(1)] = E{Zs()] = 0. (2.5.1)
Assume that, at any time 1, for n = 1,2,...4.,
a. the values of 6,(t) are statistically independent, each being uniformly distributed over
{0, 2m};
b. the values of a(t) are identically distributed random variables, independent of each other
and of the 8,(¢)"S. :
According to the central limit theorem, Z(t) and Z,(t) are approximately Gaussian random
variables at any time ¢ if V is sufficiently large. For simplicity of notation, let Z- and Z, denote
Ze(t) and Z;(t) at any time f. It can be shown that Z, and Z, are independent Gaussian random
variables with zero mean and equal variance o: | Ela2}, where of denotes aq(f) at any
time ¢. As a result, the joint pdf of Z- and Z, is
1 x? py?
f2.2,&. 9) = sz 80 | —* , OO