GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and Transition Form
GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and Transition Form
Scope: This analysis includes only severity 9 & 10's from the DFMEA
The Supplier GAP analysis is required to include all severity 9 & 10's that are passed down to the
and Processes for all directed RASIC A & B, and non-directed sub-suppliers.
Example:
Code Sub-Supplier Name
A Supplier ABC
Any deviations to this requirement must be noted at this time (SQ CG deviations/ SOR Appendix)
* DREs to support ensuring severity requirements from upper level system are provided and understoo
available in eSOR).
* Supplier shall quote all severities 9s and 10s with proper PFMEA detection (Level 3 or better unless ot
specific CG)
* Supplier shall document gaps to this requirement (Ex. CG3404 M7 Technical Issues list, GM 1927 21 D
Form)
DRE prepares the DFMEA extract (if didn't receive, contact DRE or Technical Specialist)
Conduct Supplier D-P Gap analysis meeting and document GAPs. If Gap Still exsists, fill out the GM 1
Step 5:
Transition Form.
Supplier fills out the Transition Form Tab and review with GM team for buyoff
Entry Notes for GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis and Risk Mitigation Form
In header: If GM is Design Responsibe input GM DRE. If supplier is Design Responsible input Supplier D
In column (G) PFMEA Line No. XXX, If the Failure is not included in the PFMEA, enter a "?" or in case it b
When an entry is Identified with a "?" Or "Code ?" Leave column H "SEV"blank, and input a "10" into co
Starting at CRV2 & CRV3 on the top righthand side of gap analysis place a "X" in the Box will auto popu
Completed risk mitigation: Example Below
Due Date Column "V" Entry in this signifies status of the Risk Mitigatio
or
Complete 3/2/2022
Complete
ers or Sub-suppliers process captured in the PFMEAs?
tem, sub-system, & component failure modes and identified in
chnical Issues list, GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and Transition
neering tooling changes. Suppliers to ensure all severity 9s and 10s are captured
G4338 SQ SOR requirement. Supplier to identify and document Gaps with Risk
ection are captured on shop floor. Gaps to be tracked and closed prior to Full-PPAP.
bustness.
s.
form (for sev 9 and 10 not meeting the detection requirement) reviewed by PDT
verified by SQE.
m (for sev. 9 and 10 not meeting the detection requirements) have been approved
-- -- S --
-- -- R --
-- S R --
-- S R --
-- S R --
A R S A
MEA extract in Appendix B or C of the eSOR
hnical Specialist)
0's
mbers from Supplier DFMEA for any SEV 9 & 10's
ap Analysis form
(PFMEA SEV should match the DFMEA SEV)
ap Still exsists, fill out the GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and
buyoff
he E-approval
gation Form
e a "X" in the Box will auto populate from the previous Right side of the Analysis and carry over
Complete signal the Risk Mitigation efforts are complete, and this is the intended dectection level at full PPAP
evel at full PPAP
Commodity Process Location Date
CRV 3 CRV 4 CRV 5 Participants:
Program SQE Supplier
Process Diagram DRE Other
Tech Review Gap Analysis CRV 3 Gap Analysis CRV 4 Gap Analysis CRV 5 Gap Analysis
Failure Modes to Control : 0 Failure Modes to Control : 0 Failure Modes to Control : 0 Failure Modes to Control : 0
DFMEA to PFMEA Severity 9 DFMEA to PFMEA Severity DFMEA to PFMEA Severity DFMEA to PFMEA Sever-
& 10 9 & 10 9 & 10 ity 9 & 10
Tech Review Detection Analysis CRV 3 Detection Analysis CRV 4 Detection Analysis CRV 5 Detection Analysis
PFMEA Detection Rating PFMEA Detection Rating PFMEA Detection Rating PFMEA Detection Rating
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0
9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0
8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0
7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0
5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
CRV 1 - Status Quo CRV 3 - Status Quo CRV 4 CRV 5 or Continuous Improvement
Detection Detection Detection
DFMEA Data PFMEA Data DFMEA Data PFMEA Data DFMEA Data PFMEA Data DFMEA Data PFMEA Data
Detection Detection Detection Detection CRV 3 or Status Quo CRV 3 or Status Quo CRV 5 or Improvment CRV 5 or Improvement
10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0
9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 9 0
8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0
7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0
5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Failure Modes
Process Number
KEY /
FRQ
DET
SEV
No. Product Characteristic Description Process Characteristic Description Spec or Parameter
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
This form is required to grant full PPAP approval in the event that the supplier cannot meet GM detection requirements for
Severity 9's and 10's, as outlined in the Supplier Quality's Part/Process Specific CG.
Year and Program: SMT:
PPAP Gate Date: Part Number(s) OR
Supplier: Process:
DUNS: Creativity Team:
SQE: DRE:
Issue Description Severity Occurrence Detection
Is the detection gap because technology does not exist to detect the defect?
Is the downstream detection the best in the industry? Attached Supporting
Is there another reason why requirements can't be met? Documentation
Explain the use of current technology and/or provide reasoning on why requirements can't be met:
Provide data (warranty, plant, SPC, Cpk, etc.) and controls/frequency that are in place to reduce/eliminate risk?
Supplier's Approval
Supplier's Plant
Manager Signature
(INSERT NAME HERE) Date
Nothing in the document supersedes, amends, or limits Supplier's responsibilities and obligations relating to the delivery of conforming
parts under the applicable purchase contract, including, without limitation, any quality or warranty obligations
SQ Director, PE
CG(s): SQ Manager
Director,
(For Info Only, SQ
SQ CG Update Director and SQ
(For Info Only: GFL,
EGM, SQ Manager,
______________________ GPM)
SQ GPM)
GM's Decision
Explanation:
GM Confidential
GM 1927 21 Severity and Detection Transition Form To be completed by the supplier or GM
GM Confidential
GM 1927 21 Severity and Detection Transition Form To be completed by the supplier or GM
GM Confidential
GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and Transition Form To be completed by the supplier or GM
This form is required to grant full PPAP approval in the event that the supplier cannot meet GM detection requirements for
Severity 9's and 10's, as outlined in the Supplier Quality's Part/Process Specific SOR.
Year and Program: 2019 T1CXF SMT: Chassis 1. Base information for GM approvers to review.
PPAP Gate Date: 2/5/2020 Part Number(s) OR 12345678, 87654321 2. "Part Number(s) OR Process:"
A. Use part number(s) if a Part Specific CG is affected.
Supplier: Matic Process: B. Use a process title is a Process Specific CG is affected. i.e. "Welding"
DUNS: 1234567 Creativity Team: Control Arm 3. "Creativity Team" and "SMT" are drop down lists.
SQE: Joseph Thomas DRE: Edward James
Issue Description Severity Occurrence Detection 1. "Issue Description" - Be very clear on the reason for the deviation and explain the detection ranking.
We can't meet GM's detection requirements of a detection of a 3 for weld penetration. The 2. For "Severity", "Occurrence", and "Detection", input only a number that is on the supplier's PFMEA and
best we can do is a detection of 7 for this severity 9 item. is aligned to AIAG.
10 3 7 3. Use "Attached Supporting Documentation" if more information is requested by the GM assessors to
make a decision. Or, if the supplier/SQE run out of room.
Is the detection gap because technology does not exist to detect the defect? Yes
Is the current detection/prevention technology the best in the industry? Yes Attached Supporting 4. It is understood that, depending on the SMT/CT, technology might not exist to meet PFMEA detection
Is there another reason why requirements can't be met? No Documentation requirements. There might also be additional reasons. Either way, clearly explain why so that the
Explain the use of current technology and provide reasoning on why requirements can't be met: document stands alone for the assessor to review. The assessor will also have to know if the supplier has
We have purchased a vision system to check for other welding defects, but the system does not check for weld penetration. To the the best detection/prevention equipment in the industry. SQE's must be pushing for the best equipment.
best of our knowledge, no such technology exists at our vendors. To check 100%, we would have to perform cut and etch, which would 5. Since the PFMEA detection requirements can't be achieved, list all additional applicable controls and
scrap 100% of the parts. data that aid in reducing/eliminating risk. Think about the assessors and what they would want to see.
Examples include, but not limited to: Cpk, Warranty on previous program, Standardized Work, Multiple
100% visual/tactile inspections, etc.
Provide data (warranty data, plant data, SPC, etc) and list controls that will be put in place to reduce/eliminate risk?
We have installed processing controllers to operate to validated parameters. We have two 100% visual weld inspection, on top of the
vision system. In steady state, we will be performing cut and etch testing on a daily basis. On the previous generation truck and
through builds on this program, we have not had any warranty or plant disruptions for this issue.
Supplier's Approval
1. The supplier shall sign this form for GM to process the transition request.
Supplier's Plant
Manager Signature 2. "(INSERT NAME HERE)" shall be the Supplier's Plant Manager or high level of senior leadership.
(INSERT NAME HERE) Date
Nothing in the document supersedes, amends, or limits Supplier's responsibilities and obligations relating to the delivery of conforming
parts under the applicable purchase contract, including, without limitation, any quality or warranty obligations
FOR GM USE ONLY: Required Required 1. This section will be filled in by hand or PDF Editor, by the SQE, once the supplier has signed. Please see
Approvers Approvers PowerPoint presentation for example of PDF Editor.
Design Change - Current Program 2. Example: "PRTS#/EWO#" - 123456789/ABCED - "Owner" - Edward James - Only use for "Design Change -
PRTS#/EWO#:______________________________ SQ Manager, EGM, SQ Director, PE Current Program"
(For Info Only, SQ Director,
Owner: Director and PE (For Info Only: GFL, 3. Example: 123456789/Edward James - Only use for "Design Change - Future Program"
Director) EGM, SQ Manager)
Design Change - Future Program PRTS#/Owner:
4. Only Use for "CG(s)#" for "Part Specific / Process CG Update"
SQ Director, PE
CG(s): SQ Manager
Director,
SQ CG Update (For Info Only, SQ
(For Info Only: GFL, 6."Required Approvers" automatically highlights, based on Severity, Occurrence, and Detection Rankings.
Director and SQ
______________________ GPM)
EGM, SQ Manager,
SQ GPM)
The other column will "black out" to avoid confusion
7. Enter your e-approval number.
8. "No Design or SQ CG Update" is used if there is agreement for the supplier to not follow our
requirements for only this program and GM is not planning on performing an engineering change.
SQ Manager, EGM, SQ Director, PE
(For Info Only, SQ Director,
e-approval #: _________________ No Design or SQ CG Update Director and PE (For Info Only: GFL, 9. "GM's Decision Explanation" - Document reasoning to why the approval decision was made.
Director) EGM, SQ Manager)
GM's Decision
Explanation:
GM Confidential
GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA Gap Analysis Process and Transition Form To be completed by the supplier or GM
GM Confidential
Document change record
Title
Interior DFMEA to PFMEA Gap Added learnings from users, accommodated Tech Review progress
3 10/21/2015 JR Leonardi
Analysis tracking
Interior DFMEA to PFMEA Gap Added learnings from users, DFMEA "DET" cells now hidden, and
Analysis 4 changed PFMEA required DET formula to be derived from DFMEA DET.
2/22/2016 Mark Waligora