Final-Geotechnical-Report-Shera-RCC-Bridge-Indrasarobar
Final-Geotechnical-Report-Shera-RCC-Bridge-Indrasarobar
Table of Content
Annexes:
Bore Hole Logs
Laboratory Test Result
Figures and photographs
Soil Investigation Report: Shera RCC Bridge,
Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur District
1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
This report is prepared as per the agreement between Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Bagmati
Province, Makawanpur, Nepal and Doric Villa Engineering Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. to determine bearing
capacity and subsurface exploration for design of Shera khola RCC Bridge at Indrasarobar Rural
Municipality, Makwanpur District, Nepal. Traceable Measurements Pvt. Ltd., Sanepa, Lalitpur-2,
Nepal has taken responsibility for the soil investigation and preparation of report for this project.
2. SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The scope of work includes the following:
Making 100 mm nominal diameter bore holes each of 16.0 m depth at two specified locations
using suitable approved method of boring.
Conducting standard penetration tests in the bore holes at 1.50 m interval in depth & at every
change of strata, whichever is earlier.
Collecting undisturbed soil samples from bore holes at 3.00 m interval in depth (if possible for
Undisturbed sampling) or at every change of strata, whichever is earlier.
Collecting disturbed soil samples from bore holes at regular interval and at every identifiable
change of strata to supplement the boring records.
Recording the depth of ground water table in all the bore holes if observed up to the depth of
exploration during boring work as per specifications.
Conducting the laboratory tests on selected disturbed / undisturbed soil samples collected from
various bore holes.
Preparation and submission of reports.
3. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
3.1 Penetration Tests
Standard Penetration Tests: It consists of driving a Split Spoon sampler with an outside dia. of 50
mm into the soil at the base of borehole. Driving is accomplished by a
drop of hammer weighing 63.5 kg falling freely through a height of 750
mm onto the drive head. First of all the spoon is driven 150 mm into the
soil at the bottom of the borehole. It is then driven further 300 mm and
the number of blows (N values) required to drive this distance is
recorded. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted in the
boreholes at 1.5 m intervals. The tests were conducted in accordance
with IS:2131-1981.
The result i.e., Nc values first corrected to the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) value (N) and that
provides and estimation of degree of compaction of soil strata, values of angles of internal friction ()
and allowable bearing capacity. The dynamic cone resistance is correlated with the SPT (N) as given
below.
Nc = 1.5 N for depth up to 3 m
= 1.75 N for depth 3 to 6 m
= 2 N for depth greater than 6 m
3.2 Sampling
(i) Disturbed Sample:
Disturbed samples were collected from the split spoon after conducting SPT. Before any sample was
taken, the borehole was cleaned up of loose disturbed soil deposited during boring operation. The
samples which were obtained from bailer and in the SPT tube were preserved as representative
disturbed samples for finding out index properties. The samples thus obtained were placed in airtight
double plastic bags, labeled properly for identification and later transported to the lab for analysis.
Dilatancy Correction (for fine sand and silts below water table)
Terzaghi and Peck (1976) gave correction for water pressure as,
If Nrec ≤ 15, then Ncorr =Nrec
Figure 1: Geological map of Nepal showing the site location lying on the Lesser Himalaya Zone.
(modified from Dahal, 2006)
The propose site lies in IndraSarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur District. Geologically, the
proposed site area for the Geotechnical investigation lies in the Lesser Himalayan Zone. The proposed
site primarily lies in Lesser Himalaya zone between the Sub-Himalaya (Siwaliks) in the south and
Higher Himalaya zone in the north. The Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) separates Siwaliks at the south
and Main Central thrust separates Higher Himalaya at the north and west. The Siwalik rocks are
basically consisting of sedimentary rocks (mudstone, sandstone, and conglomerate), while the Lesser
Ground motion can be simply quantified by peak values of expectable acceleration, velocity and/or
displacement. Empirical relationships, called attenuation equations, can be derived from the
interpretation of available strong motion records and relate peak ground motion parameters to
magnitude and distance from the source of energy release. Attenuation equations are sensitive to the
estimates of distance and magnitude, especially in the near-field. Peak ground acceleration (PGA) often
represents the main seismic evaluation parameter for simplified analysis purposes. The peak ground
acceleration (usually as a fraction of the peak) is the earthquake ground motion parameter usually used
in the seismic coefficient method of analysis. Attenuation model of Young’s et al (1997) for subduction
zones for bed rock was used in development of seismic hazard map of Nepal.
When fine or medium, saturated, loose sand deposit is subjected to a sudden shock (generated by an
earthquake) the mass will densify and consolidate or temporarily liquefy. This phenomenon is termed
'Liquefaction'. Pore-water pressures within such layers increase as the soils are cyclically loaded,
resulting in a decrease in vertical effective stress and shear strength. If the shear strength drops below
the applied cyclic shear loadings, the layer is expected to transition to a semi fluid state until the excess
pore-water pressure dissipates. When liquefaction takes place in a particular soil then the bearing
capacity of the soil disappears and the structure built on it gets tilts or even sinks. The past big
earthquakes, have shown that saturated sandy soils in a loose to medium dense condition were liquefied
1
𝐶𝜎 = ≤ 0.3
18.9 − 2.55√(𝑁1)60𝑐𝑠 )
(𝑁1)60𝑐𝑠 = (𝑁1)60 + ∆(𝑁1)60
2
9.7 15.7
∆(𝑁1)60 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (1.63 + −( ) )
𝐹𝐶 + 0.01 𝐹𝐶 + 0.01
Cyclic resistance ratio (CRR), the capacity of soil to resist liquefaction, can be obtained from
the corrected blow count and soil’s fine content.
𝐶𝑅𝑅7.5,1𝑎𝑡𝑚 = 𝑓[(𝑁1)60 ), 𝐹𝐶]
LPI at a site is computed by integrating the factors of safety (FS) along the soil column up to 20 m
depth. A weighting function is added to give more weight to the layers closer to the ground surface.
The liquefaction potential index (LPI) proposed by Iwasaki et al. (1978, 1982) is expressed as follows:
where z is depth of the midpoint of the soil layer (0 to 20 m) and dz is differential increment of depth.
The weighting factor, w(z), and the severity factor, F (z), are calculated as per the following
expressions:
F (z) = 1 − FS for FS < 1.0
F (z) = 0 for FS ≥ 1.0
w(z) = 10 − 0.5z for z < 20 m
w(z) = 0 for z > 20 m
The level of liquefaction severity
Liquefaction Analysis for BH1 for PGA = 0.36g, M=7.5, GWT at 3.0 m from surface
Unit wt (KN/m3)
Fine contents %
Major Soil type
Plasticity Index
Potential Index
Corrected SPT
(Iwasaki,1982)
Liquefaction
Liquefaction
Total Stress
F(z).w(z).H
Depth (m)
Eff stress
(KN/m2)
(KN/m2)
Severity
CSRM,σ
(N1)60cs
(N1)60
CRR
(N60)
w(z)
F(z)
Kσ
CN
FS
γd
H
medium
1.5 16 1 16.75 25 25 1.70 27.20 27.20 0.990 1.412 0.344 0.164 2.10 No 0 9.25 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
3.0 24 2 16.75 50 36 1.70 40.80 40.80 0.979 1.295 - 0.250 - No 0 8.5 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
4.5 32 1 16.90 76 46 1.70 54.40 54.40 0.969 1.213 - 0.306 - No 0 7.75 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
6.0 32 0 16.90 101 57 1.55 49.73 49.73 0.958 1.152 - 0.346 - No 0 7 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
7.5 36 0 17.00 126 68 1.38 49.68 49.68 0.943 1.103 - 0.374 - No 0 6.25 1.5 0.00
sand
0.00 Very
medium
9.0 36 4 17.00 152 78 1.26 45.36 45.36 0.923 1.063 - 0.394 - No 0 5.5 1.5 0.00 Low
sand
medium
10.5 38 1 17.00 177 89 1.17 44.32 44.32 0.894 1.029 - 0.405 - No 0 4.75 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
12.0 38 2 17.00 203 100 1.09 41.46 41.46 0.857 1.000 - 0.407 - No 0 4 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
13.5 38 1 17.00 228 111 1.03 39.09 39.09 0.811 0.975 - 0.402 - No 0 3.25 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
16.0 38 2 17.00 254 122 0.98 37.08 37.08 0.761 0.952 - 0.391 - No 0 2.5 1.5 0.00
sand
Liquefaction Analysis for BH2 for PGA =0.36g, M=7.5, GWT at 3.0 m from surface
Unit wt (KN/m3)
Fine contents %
Major Soil type
Plasticity Index
Potential Index
Corrected SPT
(Iwasaki,1982)
Liquefaction
Liquefaction
Total Stress
F(z).w(z).H
Depth (m)
Eff stress
(KN/m2)
(KN/m2)
Severity
CSRM,σ
(N1)60cs
(N1)60
CRR
(N60)
w(z)
F(z)
Kσ
CN
FS
γd
H
medium
1.5 14 2 16.75 25 25 1.70 23.80 23.80 0.990 1.412 0.270 0.164 1.64 No 0 9.25 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
3.0 19 3 16.75 50 36 1.70 32.30 32.30 0.979 1.295 - 0.250 - No 0 8.5 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
4.5 27 1 16.90 76 46 1.70 45.90 45.90 0.969 1.213 - 0.306 - No 0 7.75 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
6.0 32 1 16.90 101 57 1.55 49.73 49.73 0.958 1.152 - 0.346 - No 0 7 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
7.5 36 1 17.00 126 68 1.38 49.68 49.68 0.943 1.103 - 0.374 - No 0 6.25 1.5 0.00
sand
0.00 Very
medium
9.0 36 2 17.00 152 78 1.26 45.36 45.36 0.923 1.063 - 0.394 - No 0 5.5 1.5 0.00 Low
sand
medium
10.5 38 0 17.00 177 89 1.17 44.32 44.32 0.894 1.029 - 0.405 - No 0 4.75 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
12.0 38 3 17.00 203 100 1.09 41.46 41.46 0.857 1.000 - 0.407 - No 0 4 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
13.5 38 2 17.00 228 111 1.03 39.09 39.09 0.811 0.975 - 0.402 - No 0 3.25 1.5 0.00
sand
medium
16.0 38 1 17.00 254 122 0.98 37.08 37.08 0.761 0.952 - 0.391 - No 0 2.5 1.5 0.00
sand
where,
Se = net allowable settlement
𝑞
C1 = correction factor for the depth of foundation = 1 − 0.5 ∆𝑞
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
C2= correction factor to account into creep in soil = 1 + 0.2𝑙𝑜𝑔 ( )
0.1
11.98N60 3.28 B 1
2
qsafe = S
f d x Rw1
3.28 B 25
Where,
N60 = Standard Penetration Value for Average energy ratio of 60%
B = width (m)
S = Settlement (mm)
fd = 1+0.33 (D/B) ≤ 1.33
Rw1 = water correction factor = 0.5
For cohesive soil,
If the clay layer is encountered, the settlement is calculated as:
𝐻 (𝑃𝑜 + ∆𝑃
𝑠𝑒 = 𝐶𝑐 log10 ( )
1 + 𝑒0 𝑃𝑜
As per IS: 8009 clause 9.5, correction factors for rigidity and depth are applied
Notes:
1) Nγ factor is taken for general shear failure as per IS: 6403
2) Nq factor is obtained from Fig. 1. Annex B, of IS 2911 (Part 1/sec2): 2010
3) Ki, the earth pressure coefficient depending on the nature of soil strata, type of pile, spacing
of pile and its method of construction.
4) δ, angle of wall friction may be taken equal to friction angle of soil around pile stem
5) The maximum effective overburden at the pile tip should correspond to the critical depth,
which may be taken as 15 times the diameter of the pile shaft for Ф ≤ 30˚ and increasing
to 20 times for Ф ≥ 40˚
𝑄𝑢 = 𝐴𝑝 𝑁𝑐 𝑐𝑝 + ∑ 𝛼𝑖 𝑐𝑖 𝐴𝑠𝑖
𝑖=1
where,
Ap = cross-sectional area of pile tip (m2)
Nc = bearing capacity factor, taken as 9
cp = average cohesion at pile tip (kN/m2), taken from UCS of soil
∑𝑛𝑖=1 = summation for pile installed layers 1 to n and contributing positive skin friction
αi = adhesion layer for the ith layer depending on the consistency of soil
ci = average cohesion for the ith layer (kN/m2)
Asi = surface area of pile shaft in the ith layer
For non-plastic silt or very fine sand, pile capacity is modified as:
𝐿 ̅̅̅𝐴𝑠
𝑁
𝑄𝑢 = 10𝑁 𝐴𝑝 +
𝐵 0.60
9. SAMPLE CALCULATION
The allowable bearing capacity (kN/m2) for open foundation of 7.0 m x 7.0 m at depths of 3.5 m
(measured from existing ground level) for all BH using least SPT values from each depth is presented
below.
For 7.0 m x 7.0 m open foundations at depth of 3.5 m
a) For shear failure criterion,
From laboratory tests:
Friction angle =31˚, cohesion=0.0 kN/m2, Bulk density = 16.75 kN/m3, GWT at 0.0 m
Shape factors Depth Factors Inclination Factors Bearing Capacity factors
Sq 1.60 dq 1.14 iq 1.00 Nq 20.63
Sc 1.63 dc 1.20 ic 1.00 Nc 32.67
Sγ 0.60 dγ 1.00 Nγ 17.69
General Shear failure criteria IS code qgs = 391.71 kN/m2
Adopted allowable bearing capacity is minimum of shear failure and that of settlement criterion.
Hence, adopted allowable bearing capacity = 391.71 kN/m2
10. RECOMMENDATION
i The allowable bearing capacity (kN/m2) for various size of open foundations at varying depths
(measured from existing ground level) for all Bore holes are below:
Allowable Safe Bearing Capacity
Foundation Depth from existing ground
size 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
7.0 m x 7.0 m 343 392 442 493 546 600 656 683 695 695 675
7.5 m x 7.5 m 348 395 444 495 547 600 655 668 669 659 671
8.0 m x 8.0 m 352 399 448 497 549 601 645 635 655 647 640
8.5 m x 8.5 m 357 403 451 500 551 602 606 625 618 611 604
9.0 m x 9.0 m 362 408 455 504 553 579 597 591 584 578 572
9.5 m x 9.5 m 367 412 459 507 554 572 566 560 554 548 575
10.0 m x 10.0 m 372 417 464 511 550 543 538 532 527 552 549
10.5 m x 10.5 m 377 422 468 515 523 517 512 507 532 528 525
11.0 m x 11.0 m 382 427 473 504 498 493 488 512 509 506 502
11.5 m x 11.5 m 388 432 478 481 476 471 495 491 488 484 479
12.0 m x 12.0 m 393 437 464 459 455 478 475 471 466 460 457
12.5 m x 12.5 m 399 443 444 440 436 458 453 448 445 443 440
13.0 m x 13.0 m 404 430 426 421 442 436 433 431 429 426 449
13.5 m x 13.5 m 410 412 407 426 422 420 418 416 411 404 423
Care should be taken for the following during excavation and construction of the bridge foundation.
The slope of the excavation should be maintained at about 45˚ to prevent the slope from
collapsing during excavation or construction period.
Presence of seepage water and consideration of probable rise in water table in monsoon, side fall
is eminent. So, at the time of construction of foundation, it is recommended to design the
appropriate site protection measures based on soil properties as obtained on this report.
During excavation near to hill slope (>30˚) as well as near to steep valley side, stability of slope
should evaluated before the excavation by the contractor.
No. &Type
N-Value SPT
Nc-Value
Depth, m
N-Value
Symbol
Sample
DCPT
10 cm
10 cm
10 cm
Soil Description
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
-1
DCPT 10 15 17 42 28 1.5
-2
-3 DCPT 12 27 24 63 42 3
-4
DCPT 24 34 30 88 50 4.5
-5
-7
DCPT 37 >50 Blows 50 7.5
Gravel mix Sand with -8
Boulders
-9 DCPT 33 >50 Blows 50 9
- 10
DCPT 46 >50 Blows 50 10.5
- 11
- 13
DCPT 43 >50 Blows 50 13.5
- 14
- 15 15
No. &Type
N-Value SPT
Nc-Value
Depth, m
N-Value
Symbol
Sample
DCPT
10 cm
10 cm
10 cm
Soil Description
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
-1
DCPT 11 13 14 38 25 1.5
-2
-3 DCPT 12 15 24 51 34 3
-4
DCPT 20 23 30 73 42 4.5
-5
-7
DCPT 29 >50 Blows 50 7.5
- 10
DCPT 37 >50 Blows 50 10.5
- 11
- 13
DCPT 36 >50 Blows 50 13.5
- 14
- 15 15
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 1.6 2.4 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.4 0.55 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.175 0.2 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 9.14 12.00
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.57 0.63
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 4.2 4 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.7 0.4 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.32 0.18 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 13.13 22.22
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.36 0.22
90.00
80.00
Percentage Passing
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 3.5 3.3 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.7 0.5 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.19 0.22 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 18.42 15.00
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.74 0.34
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage Passing
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 4 3.1 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 1.1 0.7 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.33 0.2 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 12.12 15.50
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.92 0.79
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage Passing
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 4.5 4 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 1 0.5 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.2 0.16 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 22.50 25.00
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 1.11 0.39
90.00
80.00
Percentage Passing
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 2.2 3 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.45 0.7 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.2 0.21 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 11.00 14.29
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.46 0.78
90.00
80.00
Percentage Passing
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 2 2.8 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.45 0.65 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.2 0.2 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 10.00 14.00
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.51 0.75
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage Passing
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00
BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 3 4 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.5 0.7 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.13 0.18 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 23.08 22.22
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.64 0.68
90.00
80.00
Percentage Passing
70.00
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 3.6 2 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.6 0.63 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.13 0.15 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 27.69 13.33
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 0.77 1.32
90.00
80.00
70.00
Percentage Passing
60.00
50.00 BH01
40.00 BH02
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0.01 0.1 1 10
Sieve sizes (Logarithmic)
BH01 BH02
Diameter of particle at 60% finer (D60) 3 3 mm
Diameter of particle at 30% finer (D30) 0.8 0.5 mm
Diameter of particle at 10% finer (D10) 0.13 0.21 mm
Coefficient of Uniformity (Cu) 23.08 14.29
Coefficient of Curvature (Cc) 1.64 0.40
Normal Stress
Shear Stress kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.2 0.138
0.4 0.26
0.6 0.38
∅= 31.17
c= 0.0173
0.3
Shear Stress kg/cm2
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Normal Stress Kg/cm2
Traceable Measurements Pvt. Ltd.
Direct Shear Test
Detail Geotechnical Soil Investigation work of Shera RCC Bridge
Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur District Date:
Bore Hole No: 1 Depth: 6.0m
Size of box (mm)= 51*51 mm
Area of box (cm^2)= 25 cm^2
Volume of box (cm^3)= 46.818 cm^3
Proving ring constant (kg/div.)= 0.17
Least count of displacement dial gauge (mm/div)= 0.01 mm
Mass of soil= 79.32 gms
Density of soil= 1.69 gm/cc
Normal Stress
Shear Stress kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.2 0.145
0.4 0.24
0.6 0.385
∅= 30.96
c= 0.0167
0.4
y = 0.6x + 0.0167
0.35
Shear Stress kg/cm2
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Normal Stress Kg/cm2
Traceable Measurements Pvt. Ltd.
Direct Shear Test
Detail Geotechnical Soil Investigation work of Shera RCC Bridge
Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur District Date:
Bore Hole No: 2 Depth: 3.0m
Size of box (mm)= 51*51 mm
Area of box (cm^2)= 25 cm^2
Volume of box (cm^3)= 46.818 cm^3
Proving ring constant (kg/div.)= 0.17
Least count of displacement dial gauge (mm/div)= 0.01 mm
Mass of soil= 79.32 gms
Density of soil= 1.69 gm/cc
Normal Stress
Shear Stress kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.2 0.125
0.4 0.24
0.6 0.368
∅= 31.28
c= 0.0013
0.3
Shear Stress kg/cm2
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Normal Stress Kg/cm2
Traceable Measurements Pvt. Ltd.
Direct Shear Test
Detail Geotechnical Soil Investigation work of Shera RCC Bridge
Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur District Date:
Bore Hole No: 2 Depth: 6.0 m
Size of box (mm)= 51*51 mm
Area of box (cm^2)= 25 cm^2
Volume of box (cm^3)= 46.818 cm^3
Proving ring constant (kg/div.)= 0.17
Least count of displacement dial gauge (mm/div)= 0.01 mm
Mass of soil= 79.32 gms
Density of soil= 1.69 gm/cc
Normal Stress
Shear Stress kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.2 0.145
0.4 0.23
0.6 0.395
∅= 32.01
c= 0.0067
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Normal Stress Kg/cm2
Soil Investigation Report: Shera RCC Bridge,
Indrasarobar Rural Municipality, Makwanpur