lecture 2
lecture 2
Extinction of Coparcenary
By partition
Extinction of Coparcenary
By the death of the last surviving coparcener
A Hindu coparcenary comes to an end in two ways :
1. By partition, or
2. By the death of the last surviving coparcener.
joint family which may continue even
It is to be noted that end of coparcenary does not put an end to
death of coparceners. There can be no coparcenary without joint Hindu family but viceversa is not
after the
coparcenary is a narrower body.
true. Hindu joint family is a larger institution while
Rights of coparceners
including the common ancestor in
are the four generations
coparceners
As already stated above, Act, 2005, even
commencement of Hindu Succession (Amendment)
unbroken male descent and
after the
her own right in the same manner as the son. The
coparcener in
coparcener may become a
adaughter of a
coparcener in the coparcenary :
following are the rights of a 125
Samarth Agrawal Books
Maiows Guide to JudicialServioes
1, Mains Examinations:
Volume lll
Right of common possession and
unity of possession common cnjoyment: There is community of interest and
between all the Coparceners.
coparcenary property nor is any entitled No one is entitled to any special interest in
2. one to exclusive possession of any part of it.
Community of interest and right to savings : No coparcener has got a defined share in
Parcenary property or incomethereof and as long as family in undivided, he cannot predicate
t e nas certain share in the family property. The entire income must be brought to the common
Purse and used by all members of undivided family.
3.
Kight to joint possession : Each coparcener is entitled to joint possession and enjoyment of
the family property and ifhe is prevented by other coparcener from doing so, he is entitled to an
injunction restraining that other coparcener from disturbing his possession and enjoyment [Anant
v. Gopal, 11 Bom 269).
4. Right to enforce partition :Every coparcener, whether major or minor, is entitled to callfor
the partition of his share against his father, brother or grandfather irrespective of whether the
other coparceners agree to become divided or not.
5. Right to restrain unauthorized act : A coparcener may restrain any unauthorized act (for
example, erection of wallor building etc.) of other coparceners in respect of coparcenary property
if suchact interferes in joint enjoyment and causes substantial injury to the property or rights of
other coparceners.
6. Right to ask for accounts :A coparcener may demand an account of the management of joint
property so that he may know the actual state of family funds when the coparcener is suing for
partition. If such demand is met by refusal, he is entitled to restrain the other coparceners for
excluding him from management thereof.
7. Right of alienation : Acoparcener may alienate his undivided interest in the coparcenary by
gift, sale or mortgage with the consent of other coparceners. However, in Bombay, Madras and
Madhya Pradesh, no such consent is required.
8. Right to set aside alienations: Every coparcener has aright to set aside alienation made bythe
father, manager or any other coparcener beyond his authority which includes alienation without
legal necessity or illegal transactions without any benefit to estate.
9. Right to maintenance : A coparcener's wife and children are entitled to be maintained out of
the coparcenary funds and the members of a joint Hindu family are under a legal obligation to
maintain all the members of the joint Hindu family.
10. Right to renounce his interest : Acoparcener according to Madras High
Court, can renounce
his interest in the coparcenary property in favour of all or any of the
coparceners. Howeve, the
Bombay and Allahabad High Court are of the view that renunciation must be in favour
of all the
coparceners.
126
Samarth Agrawal Books
Thus,, under Hindu Laes
and that right
Mitakshara law, the right of
carries with it coparcener to share in the
right to be
Unity of ownership maintained out of those coparcenany property arises by birth
cproperties and to have partition of his
share.
Every coparcenary 1s the owner of
be considered as owner. the joint
family
property. It isa an
The
coparceners in particular property.The entire coparcenary as asingle unit will
undivided
coparcenary cannot know their share until there is a
partition in a
ofa coparcener issa
a interest until partition iis claimed.
fluctuating interest ie. at one The undivided coparcenary
will get on partition
cannot be predicted particular point of time what share a particular interest
partition takes place. The before rather the actual share coparcener
quantum of share may will be known when the actual
change with the change of the family circumstances.
(Distinction between
Mitakshara and Dayabhaga with regard
Ajoint hindu family to law of copracenary)
governed by Dayabhaga law differs
the following respects - from the one governed by Mitakshara law in
1. Interest by birth :Under the
birth while under Dayabhaga law, sons do not require an interest in the property by
Milakshara law, they do.
2
Detined shares : Under Mitakshara. all the
members hold the property jointly and no shares
defined. Under Dayabhaga, each heir are
holds determined share.
3. Unity of ownership:There is unity of
ownership under Mitakshara law while there is only unity
of possession under Dayabhaga.
4. Father's right of disposition : Afather in a
Mitakshara joint family cannot dispose of the
ancestral property without the consent of coparceners, but in Dayabbaga, the father can do so.
5. Right to accounts: The members oftheDayabhaga joint family can call the managing members
for an account of his management of the family which a coparcener of Mitaksbara joint family
cannot do.
6. Right to partition :Under Dayabhaza law, the son do not posess any right to demand partition
even of ancestral estate during the lifetime of father whereas under Mitakshaa, they have this
right.
7. Right of purchaser at court sale :In Dayabhag4, a purchase at acourt sale of share of a
coparcener is entitled to be put into joint poSsession with the other coparceners to the extent of
the share purchased. In Mitakshar, he does not acquire any such right.
Law of succession determines the rights and interests of joint family members. On the death of
coparcener, his interest in the joint family property devolves on the surviving coparceners by ule of
survivorship and not according to law of succession. [note: rule of survivorship has been abolished now
Changes brought by Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005