Sustainability Frameworks Guide
Sustainability Frameworks Guide
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Sustainability Tree Map Structure
3. Major Sustainability Frameworks
4. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
5. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
6. Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB)
7. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
8. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)
9. International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)
10. European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
11. Comparison of Standards
12. 20 Key Exam Points
13. Conclusion
Introduction
Sustainability reporting has evolved significantly over recent years, with various bodies
developing guidance and standards. This has often resulted in a lack of cohesive
approach, creating difficulties for companies in developing their own sustainability
reporting framework and for stakeholders seeking comparability in corporate
sustainability reports.
The sustainability landscape is moving toward greater consolidation, with three main
bodies providing guidance going forward: the International Sustainability Standards
Board (ISSB), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the Task Force on Climate-
Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This more coherent approach will bring benefits to
both preparers of sustainability reports and the stakeholders who use them.
Sustainability Tree Map Structure
1. Sustainability
Structure
Climate change creates significant risks for companies, both physical risks (such as those
arising from extreme weather) and risks of transitioning to a net-zero carbon economy. It
also creates opportunities, leading investors and stakeholders to demand better
disclosure on climate change.
• Governance
• Board oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities
• Management's role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and
opportunities
• Strategy
• Climate-related risks and opportunities identified over short, medium, and long
term
• Impact on business, strategy, and financial planning
• Resilience of strategy under different climate scenarios
• Risk Management
• Processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks
• Processes for managing climate-related risks
• Integration into overall risk management
• Metrics and Targets
• Metrics used to assess climate-related risks and opportunities
• Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions
• Targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities
TCFD disclosures are intended to complement rather than replace other bodies'
guidance, and many of these bodies have issued additional guidance on how TCFD
requirements can be incorporated into their existing frameworks.
Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB)
The CDSB works to promote the alignment of financial and non-financial information. It
aims to fill gaps in sustainability reporting by considering how existing IFRS Accounting
Standards and other guidance can be adapted to report climate, natural capital, and
environmental information.
• IFRS 7: Financial Instruments Disclosures – the framework within the standard for
disclosing risks arising from financial instruments can be transferred to the
disclosure of risks related to climate change.
• IAS 36: Impairment of Assets – there is a risk that the valuation of assets is
overstated when the valuation does not take account of the impact of climate
change.
• IAS 37: Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets – contains useful
information on how to deal with risk and uncertainty in the financial statements.
Key Findings
A 2020 CDSB review found that while all 50 of the largest companies in Europe provided
narrative reporting on climate-related matters, only 10% referred to climate-related
issues in their financial reporting, highlighting a significant gap.
The SASB is now part of the Value Reporting Foundation (VRF) with the IIRC. Before the
merger, it published a series of non-mandatory Standards which remain in issue.
Structure
In June 2021, the SASB merged with the IIRC to form the Value Reporting Foundation
(VRF). In August 2022, the VRF was consolidated into the IFRS Foundation. The SASB
Standards now serve as a key starting point for the development of the IFRS
Sustainability Disclosure Standards.
The IIRC developed the Integrated Reporting Framework. It has since merged with SASB
to form the Value Reporting Foundation, which was later consolidated into the IFRS
Foundation.
Standard Setting
Responsibilities
The ISSB has complete responsibility for all sustainability-related technical matters of
the IFRS Foundation including: - Full discretion in developing and pursuing its technical
agenda, subject to certain consultation requirements - The preparation and issuing of
Sustainability Disclosure Standards and exposure drafts, following the IFRS Foundation's
due process
Global Baseline
In June 2023, the ISSB issued its first two Sustainability Disclosure Standards: - IFRS S1
General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information -
IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures
Enforceability
Effective Date
EU large public interest entities (PIEs) and large non-EU companies listed on an EU-
regulated market exchange are required to publish ESRS-compliant sustainability
reports for the period commencing on or after January 1, 2024.
Scope
By 2028, all the following will need to comply with CSRD: - EU-based large undertakings,
listed or not - "Third-country" undertakings, including non-EU parent companies of EU
subsidiaries
Target Users
Structure
Materiality Approach
The ESRS require sustainability matters to be assessed using the "double materiality"
principle: - Impact materiality: Sustainability-related impacts that a company exerts on
its environment and stakeholders - Financial materiality: Sustainability-related
financial risks and opportunities that arise from dependencies on resources
Location Requirements
Sector-specific Standards
ESRS sector-specific standards will be developed in the next phase. In the meantime, a
transitional provision allows the first two annual sustainability reports to refer to
previous practices and available best practices and/or frameworks.
Comparison of Standards
Materiality
Financial materiality Double materiality
approach
Sector-specific
Included in ISSB Standards To be developed from 2024
disclosures
Framework Convergence
• Current Trend: Moving toward three main bodies (ISSB, GRI, TCFD)
• Benefits: More coherent approach for preparers and users
• Integration: SASB and IIRC now part of IFRS Foundation
For Investors
3. GRI Structure: GRI Standards include Universal Standards (100 series) and topic-
specific standards covering Economic (200 series), Environmental (300 series), and
Social (400 series) topics.
4. TCFD Core Areas: TCFD recommendations are structured around four pillars:
Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets.
10. Effective Dates: Both IFRS S1 and S2 are effective from January 1, 2024, with first
reports expected in 2025.
11. European Standards: ESRS comprises 12 standards across cross-cutting,
environmental, social, and governance categories, mandatory for companies under
CSRD.
12. Double Materiality: ESRS requires assessment using double materiality (impact
materiality and financial materiality), while ISSB focuses on financial materiality
only.
13. Framework Consolidation: SASB and IIRC merged to form the Value Reporting
Foundation, which was later consolidated into the IFRS Foundation.
17. Business Benefits: Companies gain from risk mitigation, operational efficiency,
reputational enhancement, improved capital access, and future-proofing.
20. Value Chain Concept: Sustainability reporting considers the full range of
interactions, resources, and relationships related to a reporting entity's business
model and external environment.
Conclusion
The sustainability reporting landscape is evolving toward greater coherence, with the
ISSB, GRI, and TCFD emerging as the main standard-setters. This consolidation will
benefit both preparers and users of sustainability reports by providing more consistent
and comparable information.
Effective sustainability reporting is increasingly important for both investors and
reporting entities. For investors, it provides crucial information for decision-making and
assessing long-term viability. For companies, it offers benefits ranging from risk
mitigation and operational efficiency to reputational enhancement and future-proofing.