2c1f6832a44a9737d2cfdf07978b60b9f1c2
2c1f6832a44a9737d2cfdf07978b60b9f1c2
ABSTRACT
A non-conventional method to reduce the impurities in the wet process phosphoric acid (WPPA) was
applied which divided into two parts: The first part deals with a process which utilizes phosphate rock,
fluorosilicic acid, and sulfuric acid to produce phosphoric acid, calcium fluorosilicate, and calcium sulfate
slurry by wet method. The second part studied the influence of hydroxyl-apatite (HAP) added to the
produced acid for adsorption of uranium, fluorine, rare earth elements (ΣREE), organic matter, and other
undesirable components those affected the quality of phosphoric acid. The relevant conditions in the
production and absorption processes have been optimized. The results show that, the obtained acid contains
low values of suspended & organic matter (191.7 ppm), and fluorine (0.5%). The addition of HAP, in the
form of bone powder, produce phosphoric acid contains low concentration of uranium, fluorine, and rare
earth elements equals 85, 94.6 and 79% respectively.
•
3Ca3(PO4)2.CaF2 + 10H2SO4 • 10CaSO4 +6H3PO4 +2HF
36 MOHAMMAD M. FAWZY
concentration of initial sample was measured Using proportions of rock and sufficient vol-
2 • SiF4 + 2H2O
(Co) before absorption process. After each ume of two applied acids those are preferred
4HF + SiO
process,
3Ca3(PO 4)2.CaF2 the
+ 10H 2SO4 • solution
aqueous was3PO
10CaSO4 +6H separated
4 +2HF in most cases, the general reaction is repre-
and analyzed for uranium and total rare earths sented by the following equation to produce
contents (ΣREE). The absorption efficiency the so-called triple super-phosphate (Winter,
3SiF4 + 2H2O • 2H2SiF6 + SiO2
percent (E) % was calculated as follows: 1953):
•
NON-CONVENTIONAL APPROACH FOR IMPURITIES REDUCTION 37
Table 2: Analysis of the mixed phosphate ore and Table 3: Analysis of by-products CaSiF6 and
• Table 2: Analysis of the mixed phosphate ore and produced phosphoric CaSO
produced phosphoric acid
Tableacid
3: Analysis of by-products CaSiF6 and CaSO4
4
Components Phosphate ore Produced acid Commercial acid Components CaSiF6 CaSO4
Conc. (%) Conc. (%)
CaO 37.9 6.41 4.92 CaO 24.7 26.4
SO3 6.77 2.52 7.11 Si 51.2 8.36
SiO2 12.1 3.25 4.75 F 19.5 0.01
P2O5 27.4 29.6 23.6 SO3 1.17 39.2
Fe2O3 9.03 3.95 6.85 Fe2O3 8.52 5.26
K2O 0.17 0.04 0.08 Conc. (ppm)
Na2O 0.14 0.61 0.06 Cr 36 62
Ba 17 19
•
MnO 0.12 0.07 0.12
Co 20 16
F•
MgO 0.84 0.52 0.84
2.11 0.50 0.91• Sr 12 8.0
∑• Traces 0.18 0.06 0.17 Pb 16 11
• (ppm)
Conc. •
Zn 53 74
∑• REE 1410 410 607 V 23 18
U• 95.6 34.2 39.5• U 41 23
Organic matter 504 191.7 472 ∑• REE 321 542
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
9
• 8 Produced Acid
7 Commercial Acid
•
Content %
6
5
• 4
3
• 2
•
1
0
•
CaO SO3
SO3 Fe2O3
Fe2O3 SiO2
SiO2 F
Components
• • •••••••• •
Fig. 1: Comparison between different••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Fig. 3:••• •EDX analysis
• •• • • •• •••••• •••• • •• •• • • •• •for
••• •••• •the
•••• • ••produced
•••••• •• • calcium
•
components (%) in the produced phosphoric fluorosilicate
•
acid •(29.6% P2O5) and commercial one (23.6%•
P2•O5) •
•
• •
••••• ••• • • • ••••• • •• • •• • • • •• •• • •• • •••• • • • • • • ••••• •••• ••• • •• •• • • •• • •• • • •• • • •••••••• ••• • •• • •
• agitation
speed, and solid/liquid mass ratio
• • • • •••• • ••• • • • ••••••• • • ••• • •• • •• • • • ••
600 Produced Acid
• were optimized as following:
500• Commercial Acid
• Reaction time
conc., ppm
•
At room temperature, the reaction time
400
•
300
• • for the addition of HAP to the produced
200
•
phosphoric acid was studied during 10-30 min.
•
100 Agitation speed was 150 rpm. To 1L of phos-
0• phoric acid, 10 g of bone powder was added.
U OM • REE The result was plotted on Figure (4).
•
The result indicates that, by increasing the
Components
•••• • •
Fig. 2: Comparison between different trace time up to 20 min., the absorption efficiency
(ppm) in the produced phosphoric acid increases
•••••• ••••• • • ••••• • •• • •• •• • •• •••• •• • ••••••• •• •• • • • ••••• • • •••• ••• • •• •• • • •• • •• • • •• • • ••••••••
elements • to reach 41, 55 and 32% for U, F,
(29.6% • • ••••) •and
•• • •• •P•• •O ••• • • •commercial
••••••• • • ••• • •• • •• • • • ••one (23.6% P O ) and ΣREE respectively. The time 20 min. was
2 5 2 5
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 38 MOHAMMAD
•
M. FAWZY
70 60
U U
60 F F
50
50 • REE • REE
40
40
E%
E%
30
30
20
20
10
10
0 0
10 15 20 25 30 1L 2L 3L 4L
• Phosphoric Acid volume, L
Time, min.
• •
•
Fig. 4: Effect of time on the absorption ••••••••••••••
•
Fig. 5: Effect of phosphoric acid volume on
•• ••• • • •••• ••• • • •• • • ••••• ••• •• • •• • • •• • ••• • •• • •• •• ••• • •• •••••• • •• ••• ••• ••
••••••••••••••••• ••• ••• •••• ••••• • •• • ••• • •• • •• •• ••• • •• •••••• • •• ••• ••• •• • •• • • •• • • ••••• ••• •
efficiency (E) % on phosphoric acid the absorption efficiency (E) %
• •
•
•
•
the optimum one for absorption of undesir-
• able impurities from phosphoric acid. 90 U
F
• Phosphoric acid volume
80
• REE
70
•
Different volumes of acid (1- 4L) were 60
E%
•
at room temperature and standard conditions. 40
The effect of phosphoric acid volume on the 30
• absorption process was shown on Figure (5). 20
• •
• •
• •
• •
• NON-CONVENTIONAL APPROACH
• FOR IMPURITIES REDUCTION 39
95 100
U U
90 95 F
F
85 • REE • REE
90
E %
80
E%
85
75
80
70
65 75
60 70
150 200 250 300 1 st 2 nd 3 rd
Agitation Speed, rpm Successive absorption steps
• •
Fig. 7: Effect of agitation speed on the Fig. 8: Effect of successive step on absorption
••••••••••••••••••••• •• ••• • • •••• ••• • ••• • • • ••• • • • •• • ••• • •• • •• •• ••• • •• •••••• • •• ••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•
absorption efficiency (E) % •••••••••••••••• •• ••• • • •••• •••• ••• •••• • •••• • •• • •• • •• •• • • • •• •• •• ••• ••
processes
• •
•
phosphoric acid, and agitation speed of 250 • phosphoric acid, produced by acidulation of
• rpm. This conditions lead to absorb of 80, 93
• phosphate rock with hydro-fluorosilicic acid
• and 76% of U, F and ΣREE respectively. and sulfuric acid in the so-called wet process
•
phosphoric acid (WPPA), has been devel-
• Successive absorption step • oped in the present work. This was possible
• In the successive absorption processes, •
through absorption of U, F and ΣREE by using
•
the treatment of residual U, F, and ΣREE in hydroxy-apatite in the form of bone powder.
the phosphoric acid was carried out on 3 steps. The corresponding relevant factors were stud-
Under the optimum experimental conditions, ied and the conclusions can be summarized as
the treated phosphoric acid samples were sub- follows:
jected to successive absorption process. The
1- A method for manufacture of substan-
results are represented on Figure (8).
tially pure calcium fluorosilicate and phos-
From the results, the absorption efficiency phoric acid, from mixed phosphate rock
for U, F and ΣREE increases in the second acidulated by hydro-fluorosilicic acid and
step of process to reach the value of 85, 94.6 sulfuric acid, leads to produce acid contains
and 79 % respectively. On the other hand, the 29.6% P2O5, 3.95% Fe2O3, 6.41% CaO, 0.5%
third step has no effect on the absorption of U, F and traces of some undesirable elements.
F and ΣREE from phosphoric acid that pro- The acid contains also 34.2 and 410 ppm of
duced by non-conventional approach. U & ΣREE respectively, with low values of
The proposal flow sheet for the overall organic matters, humic acids (191.7 ppm), and
process included the production and absorp- unwanted suspended materials.
tion step was illustrated on Figure (9) . 2- The absorption of U, F and ΣREE by
The physical properties indicate that the Hydroxy-apatite (HAP) in the form of bone
obtained acid from non-conventional ap- powder was carried out at room temperature
proach have green clear color with high den- during 20 min. by the addition of 30 gm of
sity in comparison with the commercial one HAP to 1L of the phosphoric acid produced
of dark brown color of high amount of humic by non-conventional approach. The absorp-
acid (Table 4) produced in Abu-Zaabal Com- tion process gives rise to absorb of 85, 94.6
pany for chemicals and fertilizers. and 79% of U, F and ΣREE respectively after
two successive steps. Most of uranium un-
CONCLUSIONS dergoes into CaSiF6 and CaSO4 residue due to
the ionic radii similarity of calcium and ura-
A successful absorption procedure of nium.
•
• 40 MOHAMMAD M. FAWZY
•
Fig. 9: Proposal flow sheet for manufacturing and absorption process
Table 4: The•physical
•• •• ••• •• •properties
• •• ••••• • •••
of•the
• ••••produced
••• • • • •• and
••• ••• • •• • • •• • •• phosphoric
commercial •• ••• • •• •• ••acid
•••
Table 4: The physical properties of the produced and commercial phosphoric acid
•
Specification •
•
Character
•
Produced phosphoric acid Commercial phosphoric acid
Appearance green dark brown
• Odor Slight acid odor Slight acid odor •
• pH < 2 <1
Density 1.67 1.53 •
•
NON-CONVENTIONAL APPROACH FOR IMPURITIES REDUCTION 41
Acknowledgements G., 1992. Immobilization of heavy metals by
hydroxyl apatite. Radiochimica Acta, 58 (59),
The author wish to thank the collaboration
253-257.
from Abu-Zaabal Company for fertilizers and
Chemicals, Prof. Mohsen M. Ali, Ex-President Gouider, M.; Feki, M., and Sayadi, S., 2009. Sepa-
of Nuclear Materials Authority, (NMA) and rative recovery with lime of phosphate and flu-
Prof. Hisham F. Aly, Ex-President of Egyptian oride from an acidic effluent containing H3PO4,
Atomic Energy Authority, (EAEA). HF and/or H2SiF6. J. Hazardous Materials,
170(2), 962-968.
REFERENCES Hechenbleikner, I., 1991. Process of making phos-
Abdel Aal, E.A., 1989. Industrial simulation for phoric acid. U.S. Patent, No.1313379
wet process phosphoric acid production. Ph.D.
Thesis, Fac. Sci., Cairo Univ., Egypt. Laesen, M., and Ravenholf, G., 1994. Dissolution
of various calcium fluoride preparations in in-
Abdel Aal, E.A., 2000. Recovery of phosphoric organic solutions and stimulated human saliva.
acid from Egyptian Nile Valley phosphate tail- Caries Research, 28 (6), 447-454.
ings. Mineral. Engin. J., 13, 223-226.
Lapple, W.C., and Mountainside, N.J., 1967. Pro-
Abdel-Gawwad, E.E., 2003. Development of duction of phosphoric acid from a phosphatic
uranium recovery process from the purifica- ore. U.S. Patent, No. 3323864.
tion phosphoric acid pilot plant at Inchass
site. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Alexandria Univ., Mourabet, M.; Rhilassi, A.E.; Boujaady, H.E.; Ben-
Egypt, 145p. nani-Ziatni; Hamri, R.E., and Taitai, A., 2015.
Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by
Becker, P., 1983. Phosphates and phosphoric adsorption on hydroxy-apatite (HAP) using re-
acid: raw materials, technology, and economics sponse surface methodology. J. Saudi Chemical
of the wet process. Fertilizer Science and Tech- Society, 19 (6), 603-615.
nology Series, 3, New York, Marcel Dekker.
Oneill, P.S., 1980. Calcium fluoride production in
Chopey, N., 2004. Handbook of Chemical Engi- a phosphoric acid plant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod.
neering Calculations. 3rd Edition, McGraw- Res. Dev., 19 (2), 250-255.
Hill.
Savova, M.; Bart, H., and Seikova, I., 2005. En-
Deng, S.B.; Jiang, B.H.Y., and Wang, H.Y., 2013. hancement of mass transfer in solid-liquid
Adsorption of UO2+2 on hydroxy-apatite. J. extraction by pulsed electric field. J. Univ. of
Nucl. Radio., 35 (1), 46-53. Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 40 (4),
El-Shafie, A.S., 2008. Studies on the production 329-334.
of phosphoric acid fron Abu-Tartur phosphate Schorr, M.; Valdez, B.; Zlatev, R., and Stoytcheva,
ore deposits. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Zagazig M., 2013. Phosphate ore processing for phos-
Univ., Egypt, 121p. phoric acid production: classical and novel
Erickson, W.R., and Bouffard, L.E., 1993. Process technology. Mineral Processing and Extractive
for the production of phosphoric acid and hy- Metallurgy, 119 (3), 125-129.
drogen fluoride from phosphate rock and fluo- Singh, H., and Vijayalakshmi, R., 2001. Studies
rosilicic acid. U.S. Patent, No. 5180569. on uranium extraction from phosphoric acid
Erickson, W.R., and Bouffard, L.E., 1996. Process using di-nonyl phenyl phosphoric acid-based
for the production of phosphoric acid and cal- synergistic mixtures, Hydrometallurgy, 59(1),
cium fluoride. U.S. Patent. No. 5531975. 69-76.
Gauglitz, R.; Holterdorf, M.; Franke, W., and Marx, Sweat, S.F.; Breed, C.E., and McGill, K.E., 2004.
42 MOHAMMAD M. FAWZY
Phosphate acidulation utilizing HF acid. U.S. U.S. Patent, No. 2636806.
Patent. No. 6,676,914 B1.
Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Tu, G.X., and Huang, X.,
Vernooy, P.D., and Michel, J.B., 2001. Process for 2014. Study on removal effect and mechanism
the production of calcium fluoride, U.S. Patent. of uranium by hydroxyapatite and natural apa-
No. 6224844 B1. tite, Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu, 48, 56-63.
Winter, E.A., 1953. Acidulation of phosphate rock.
ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﺨﻔﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﺋﺐ ﺃﺛﻨﺎء ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻊ ﺣﻤﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺳﻔﻮﺭﻳﻚ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﻮﺯﻯ
ﺗﻢ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻁﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﺨﻔﺾ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﺋﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺠﺔ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻊ ﺣﻤﺾ
ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺳﻔﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻁﺒﺔ .ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺇﻟﻲ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻻﻭﻝ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﺫﺍﺑﺔ ﺻﺨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺳﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻤﺾ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺭﻭﻓﻠﻮﺭﺳﻠﻴﻜﺎﺕ ﻭﺣﻤﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺮﻳﺘﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺰﻳﻦ ﻹﻧﺘﺎﺝ
ﺣﻤﺾ ﻓﻮﺳﻔﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻭﻓﻠﻮﺭﻭﺳﻴﻠﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻟﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺪﺍﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺣﻤﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺮﻳﺘﻚ ﻟﺘﺮﺳﻴﺐ
ﻛﺒﺮﻳﺘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻟﺴﻴﻮﻡ )ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺳﻔﻮﺟﺒﺲ( .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺠﺰء ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﻮﺭ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻻﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺭﻭﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺑﺎﺗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺴﺤﻮﻕ
ﻋﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﺗﻤﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺆﺛﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺘﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﺍﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻣﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﻳﺤﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻗﻞ ﻛﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻟﻖ )(۱۹۱٫۷
ﺟﺰء ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻮﺭ) ،(٪۰٫٥ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻟﻲ ﺇﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺎﺩﻝ % 85ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﻭ ٪ ۹٤٫٦ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ٪۷۹ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻻﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺑﺈﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺴﺤﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﺍﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ.