ASSESS-312-FINAL
ASSESS-312-FINAL
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
ASSESS 312: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 13
Overview:
This is a course that focuses on the principles, development and utilization of alternative forms
of assessment in measuring authentic learning. It emphasizes on how to assess process- and
product-oriented learning outcomes as well as affective learning. Students will experience how to
develop rubrics and other assessment tools for performance- based assessment.
General Objectives:
Each chapter in this module contains the principles, development and utilization of alternative
forms of assessment in measuring authentic learning. The units are characterized by continuity, and
are arranged in such a manner that the present unit is related to the next unit. For this reason, you are
advised to read this module. After each unit, there are exercises to be given. Submission of task given
will be during your scheduled class hour.
What is a rubric?
A rubric is an assessment tool that specifies the performance expectations for any kind of student
work, particularly those that are not traditional in nature, such as portfolio, outputs or projects,
performances, collaborative work, and research. Generally, it contains three essential features: (1)
criteria or the aspects of performance that will be assessed, (2) descriptors or the characteristics
associated with each criterion, and (3) performance levels that identify students’ level of mastery within
each criterion.
The following are examples of student performances and outputs that can be assessed by a rubric:
Student Performances:
1. Oral Presentations/Demonstrations
Research paper/poster presentation
Individual or group report
Skills demonstration, such as baking and teaching
Extemporaneous speech
2. Dramatic/Creative Performances
Dance recital
Performance in a play or musicals
Poetry reading and interpretation
Playing musical instruments
3. Public Speaking
Debates
Declamation
Panel discussion
Inspirational speech
4. Athletic Skills Demonstration/Competition
Products/Outputs
1. Visual Products
Paintings
Collages
Posters
Video presentations
2. Kinesthetic Products
Diorama
Sculpture
Dance recital
Wood carvings
3. Written Products
Essays
Poems
Thesis/term paper
Movie/TV script
4. Verbal Products
To differentiate the above with a task-specific rubric, the following example is given below. In this
rubric, the different criteria that are specific to the performance task to be assessed are indicated.
Sample Task-Specific Rubric for Reviewer/Critic of Performance Tasks/Outputs
Criteria Not Evident Insufficient Sufficient Excellent
1 2 3 4
Provided .
meaningful/
relevant
feedback on:
-significance No/few Comments are Comments are Comments
of the study Comments or superficial and relevant and include
suggestions; not relevant. appropriate suggestions and
with little additional
understanding. resources
regarding the
construct/problem.
- theoretical No/few Comments are Comments are Comments
On the other hand, examples of the holistic and analytic rubrics are presented below.
Sample Holistic Rubric for Oral Presentation
Rating/Grade Characteristics
A Is very organized. Has a clear opening statement that catches
audience's interest. Content of report is comprehensive and
(Exemplary)
demonstrates substance and depth. Delivery is very clear and
understandable, uses slides/multimedia equipment effortlessly to
enhance presentation.
B
Is mostly organized. Has opening statement relevant to topic. Covers
(Satisfactory) important topics. Has appropriate pace and without distracting
mannerisms. Looks at slides to keep on track.
C Has an opening statement relevant to topic but does not give outline of
speech; is somewhat disorganized. Lacks content and depth in the
(Emerging)
discussion of the topic. Delivery is fast and not clear; some items not
covered well. Relies heavily on slides and notes and makes little eye
contact.
GRADE
What are the characteristics of a good rubric?
A good rubric should have the following qualities:
1. Explicit. A good rubric should contain criteria and performance indicators that are clear, concrete,
and observable as well as relevant and applicable to the performance task to be assessed. Each
benchmark and point value should also have clearly delineated indicators, differentiating the expected
quality of work for each performance level.
2. Aligned. A good rubric should contain criteria that are aligned with the expected quality of
performance for a particular task or assignment, as well as with the intended level of learning
outcomes in the subject.
3. Authentic. A good rubric should include criteria and performance indicators or descriptors that are
meaningful and require application of real-life skills.
4. Valid. A good rubric should be able to measure what it intends to measure.
.5. Diagnostic. A good rubric should be able to communicate to the students what are expected of
them in the course, allow them to reflect on their performance, and provide them opportunities to
improve on areas that they did not do well.
ACTIVITY #13
Discussion and Exercise Question
Directions: Read and understand this module. Provide what is being asked. Write your answer in a
long bond paper (Hand written) and attach to the last page of this module.
Task:
A. Complete the following graphical representation below about the important information on creating
rubrics.
Rubrics
What are the types? When to use? What is a good rubric? How to create?
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
ASSESS 312: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 1
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 14
Step 1: Determine the learning outcome and the performance task to be evaluated.
It is important to be clear about the learning outcome/s and the specific performance task that will be
evaluated. Choose tasks that are essential (i.e. specific aligned with desired learning outcomes),
authentic (i.e., involves meaningful and (i.e., real-life aligned application of skills), complex (i.e.,
contains numerous possibilities for application, extensions, and connections of knowledge and skills),
feasible (i.e., or can be done given the time constraints and availability of resources), and measurable
(i.e., it can be observed and measured).
To guide you in identifying the performance task/s that you want evaluated, ask yourself the following
questions:
1. What learning outcome/s are to be evaluated?
2. Which student performance/s or output/s in the subject are relevant measures of such students'
learning outcomes?
3. Are all of these tasks equally important?
4. Which is the best representation of the expected learning outcomes?
Step 5: Write the benchmark or performance descriptors for quality work criteria.
It is important that the behaviors, characteristics, or qualities that illustrate or exemplify each
performance level are clear and delineated. These performance descriptors should describe the
relative differences between performances at each level. The differences between performance points
can be presented by:
(1) aspects of performance or behavior at different levels
e.g, evaluates the different characteristics of… (4 points)
analyzes the different characteristics of.. (3 points)
describes the different characteristics of... (2 points)
lists the different characteristics of... (1 point)
(2) adjectives, adjectival phrases, adverbs and adverbial phrases to present different qualitative
differences between levels
e.g, explains to a very great extent the…
explains to a great extent the..
explains with moderate accuracy the…
explains with limited accuracy the...
(3) numeric references to identify quantitative differences between levels
e.g, gives more than 4 relevant examples of...
gives 3-4 relevant examples of the…
gives 1-2 relevant examples of the...
gives no(0) relevant examples of the…
(4) degrees of assistance needed by the student to complete the task
ACTIVITY #14
Discussion and Exercise Question
Directions: Read and understand this module. Provide what is being asked. Write your answer in a
long bond paper (Hand written) and attach to the last page of this module.
Task: Create a rubric for assessing a specific performance or output supposed in your class. Be sure
to follow the steps in making rubrics. (50 points)
Criteria Percentage
Relevance 45
Neatness 5
Total 50 points
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
ASSESS 312: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 15
The points depend on the quality of the behavior shown by the learner's performance. The reliability of
the assigned points can be determined when the scoring of two or more observers to the same
behavior is consistent. Such procedure entails the use of multiple raters or judges to rate the
performance. The consistency of the ratings can be obtained using a coefficient of concordance. The
Kendall's w coefficient of concordance is used to test the agreement among raters.
If a performance task was demonstrated by five students and there are three raters. The rubric
used a scale of 1 to 4 where 4 is the highest and1 is the lowest.
Kendall's 𝜔 coefficient of 0.38 is an estimation of the agreement of the three raters in the five
demontrations. There is a moderate concordance among the three raters because the coefficient is far
from 1.00.
How do we quantify results from scales and checklists?
Scales could be a measure of noncognitive dimensions of students' behavior. When the items in the
scale are answered by students, the response format quantifies the behavior measured by the scale.
The types of response format vary depending on the nature of the behavior measured.
Likert Scale. The Likert scale is used to measure students' favorability and unfavorability toward a
certain object. The favorability will depend on the degree of agreement or disagreement to a
standpoint.
Example: The policeman is helpful in the street.
___Strongly agree ___Agree ___Disagree ___Strongly disagree
To quantify the scales, a numerical score can be assigned to each of the responses. For example,
4 points can be assigned to strongly agree, 3 points for agree, 2 points for disagree, and 1 point for
1. Teacher
2. Academic coordinator
3. Guidance counselor
4. Assistant principal
5. Principal
Semantic Differential Scale. This scale is used to describe the object or behavior by making use
of two opposite adjectives
Example: Rate the teaching of your teacher based on the characteristics provided.
My teacher is:
1. Accommodating ______________________________ Alienating
ACTIVITY # 15
Discussion and Exercise Question
Directions: Read and understand this module. Provide what is being asked. Write your answer in a
long bond paper (Hand written) and attach to the last page of this module.
Criteria Percentage
Relevance 45
Neatness 5
Total 50 points
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
ASSESS 312: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 16
ACTIVITY # 16
Discussion and Exercise Question
Directions: Read and understand this module. Provide what is being asked. Write your answer in a
long bond paper (Hand written) and attach to the last page of this module.
Task: Discussion
A. Why do we need to quantify assessment results and why it is important to couple quantitative
assessment results with qualitative?
Criteria Percentage
Content 10
Organization and grammar 8
Neatness 2
Total 20 points
LEARNING MODULE
FOR
ASSESS 312: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING 2
_____________________________________________________
WEEK 17
The essay is good. You started the paragraph in your essay with a
topic sentence and supporting sentences were
Note: Saying that the essay is good does
provided after. This helped strengthen the point
not provide to the learner which part was
you want to make.
good. The learner might think that the
essay is good in all aspects. Note: This feedback is specific in saying why
the feedback is good based on the structure of
the sentences in the paragraph.
The painting needs improvement. I can't Perhaps you may want to use other colors in
see any object! your painting so that we can distinguish the
objects.
Note: This is a broad feedback because it
does not say what specific part needs to be Note: This feedback is specific in giving a
improved. recommendation on what can be done about
the painting.
There are several grammatical errors in the Check again the idea conveyed by author
paper. in the journal because there are
discrepancies on page 3 (pertaining to the
criteria on accuracy of information)
.
What are the different forms of feedback?
There are three areas to focus when giving feedback. These areas are feedback on the product or
performance, on the procedure or process performed, and on the strategy in improving the work.
1. Focus on the product or performance. This kind of feedback describes how well the performance
was done. Examples of such feedback are:
"All the parts of the paper are complete." "You have used up-to-date references in your paper"
"Include a definition of the term based on the main author."
"Rephrase the findings stated by the author on page 25."
2. Focus on the procedure. This kind of feedback focuses on the step-by-step process that needs to
be done by the learner.
"Follow the guidelines stated in the workbook in conducting the experiment to get accurate results."
"Try a different procedure in solving the problem."
ACTIVITY # 17
Directions: Read and understand this module. Provide what is being asked. Write your answer in a
long bond paper (Hand written) and attach to the last page of this module.
Task:
A. Below is incident about the performance of a learner. Provide the appropriate feedback to the
situation.
In a music class for Grade 7, each student rendered a solo song number in front of the class
accompanied by a piano. One student could not reach the high note required in one line of the song.
What feedback will you provide?
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________.