West Asia Peace Plan - Civilsdaily
West Asia Peace Plan - Civilsdaily
civilsdaily.com/burning-issue-west-asia-peace-plan
Context
With West Asia Peace plan the US plans to revive the stalled two-state talks between the Israelis and the
Palestinians.
Israel has consistently been encroaching more and more in the West Bank through its settlements.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, who had earlier spoken against the two-state solution, has accepted the Trump
plan.
Background
After World War I, both West Bank and the Gaza Strip became part of British-mandated Palestine.
But by the end of World War II, there was a strong demand from Jews fleeing Nazi Europe for a homeland within
Palestine, an Arab-dominated region.
It also had to do with Jerusalem, considered a holy city by the Jews, which was inside British-mandated Palestine.
When the British mandate ended in 1947, the UN proposed an Arab-Jewish partition of Palestine — between
Palestine and the new state of Israel.
This partition plan mandated 53 per cent of the land to the Jewish-majority state (Israel) and 47 per cent to the
Palestinian-majority state (Palestine).
Birth of Israel
The idea of creating a new-Jewish majority state didn’t bode well for the Arab countries in the Middle East.
Jewish paramilitary groups, however, formed the state of Israel by force in 1948.
Shrinking of Palestine
This prompted a deadly war with its Arab neighbours — Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan in 1948. This was
the first Arab-Israeli war.
Israel won this war and ended up occupying more land than previously envisaged in the 1947 UN partition plan.
By the end of the war in 1949, Israel had taken up 78 per cent of what was supposed to be original Palestine. The
Palestinian territory shrank to 22 per cent of what it had earlier been.
Meanwhile, the West Bank and East Jerusalem came under Jordan’s rule while West Jerusalem went to Israel.
The Gaza Strip was under Egyptian military rule after the 1949 war.
West Bank
Gaza Strip
The Gaza Strip is a small boot-shaped territory along the Mediterranean coast between Egypt and Israel.
A couple of years later in 2007, Hamas, an anti-Israel military group, took over Gaza Strip. The militia group is
often involved in violent clashes with the Israeli Defence Forces.
While Palestine has staked claim to both territories — West Bank and Gaza Strip — Israel’s objective has been to
keep expanding Jewish settlements in these regions.
Both the West Bank and Gaza Strip are home to a large number of Palestinian populations. There are approximately 2
million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and 3 million in the West Bank, according to the Palestinian Authority’s
Population Registry.
The West Asia Peace Plan
The plan unveiled by Trump seeks to give the Israelis what they have long wanted — an expansive state with
Jerusalem as its “undivided capital” and tight security control over a future Palestinian state.
The Trump Plan is a 180-page document called “Peace for Prosperity”.
The plan seeks to address most of the contentious issues in the conflict such as the border of Israel, the status of
Palestinian refugees, Jewish settlements on the West Bank, land swap between Israel and Palestine, Israel’s
security concerns and the status of the city of Jerusalem.
The creation of a “Palestinian state” must meet a set of basic conditions where Palestinian leaders must:
Jerusalem, perhaps the most contentious issue, would be “the undivided capital” of Israel, with Palestine gaining
its capital in the east of the city — beyond the security border Israel has already built.
In return, Israel would freeze further settlement activities on the West Bank for four years — the time for
negotiations.
2) Land Swap
According to the Oslo Accords, the West Bank was divided into three areas and only one of them is under the
direct control of the Palestinian Authority.
The plan proposes some land swap for the Israeli annexation of the West Bank Jewish settlements.
It seeks to enlarge Gaza and connect the strip with the West Bank through a tunnel.
The Arab towns in the southeast of Israel, which are close to Gaza, could become part of a future Palestinian state.
3) Curb on Hamas
During this period, the Palestinian Authority should dismiss its current complaints at the International Criminal
Court against Israel and refrain itself from taking further actions.
It should also crackdown on “terrorist” groups such as Hamas and the Islamic Jihad.
4) Investment Plans
The US has also proposed $50 billion in investment over 10 years should Palestine accept the proposals.
In the final settlement, Palestine would get control over more land than what it currently controls.
5) Security restrictions
Following the signing of the agreement, the State of Israel will maintain responsibility for Palestinian security.
The State of Israel will be responsible for the security of all international crossings of the Palestinian State.
The Palestinian state must be completely demilitarized.
A Palestinian state will be prohibited from entering into military, intelligence or security agreements with any
state or organization that the State of Israel views negatively in terms of its security.
The Palestine position is backed by most of the world powers is the formation of an independent, sovereign
Palestinian state based on the 1967 border.
But the US has effectively rejected the Palestinian claims outright and asked them to make more compromises.
And for this, the Palestinians should take action against militant groups, stop supporting Palestinian families of
those jailed or killed by Israel and refrain it from questioning the occupation in international fora.
As a result, from all of the above, it is clear why the Palestinians are not ready to accept such a “limited
sovereignty” version of the Palestinian state.
India’s stance
India has since long been maintaining that Israel-Palestine conflict should be resolved through negotiation
resulting in sovereign, independent, viable and united State of Palestine, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
India has urged both countries to “engage with each other, including on the recent proposals put forward by the
United States, and find an acceptable two-state solution for peaceful coexistence”.
Conclusion
The plan re-iterates the ideals of US fondness of Israel. It is no way a negotiation but a dictation of the vested US
interest to control the Arab region.
The consequences of America’s poor understanding of West Asia geopolitics are there to see in Iraq and Libya,
among other states in the region.
Netanyahu needs the plan now because the one-sided, all-out-for-Israel US vision will divert attention from a
corruption indictment that was filed against him in court a few days ago.
Call upon the international community to divest from, boycott and sanction Israel in order to stop the “ongoing
catastrophe”.
Way Forward
The situation in Palestine is not a conflict but a struggle against settler colonialism. Not unlike the struggle against
Apartheid South Africa.
It is a travesty of truth that the influential and all-pervasive pro-Israel lobby has stayed silent on this plan of U.S.
Land grabbing with force has been a fundamental element of Israel’s approach towards the Palestinians.
It is time for international actors who care about the situation of the Palestinians and start pushing for the latter
solution.
The world at large needs to come together for a peaceful resolution to ensure a viable and long-lasting solution to
solve this issue.
However, with the reluctance of the Israeli government and the US involved in this issue, it may not be possible in
the near future.
Pressure from the outside, a continued popular struggle from the inside and a clear Palestinian vision for the
future can turn this vision into reality.