Deviance 1& 4 Module
Deviance 1& 4 Module
Prepared by
Gayathri. S
Assistant Professor
Ramaiah College of Law
CRIME DEVIANCE
1.Violations of State 1.Violations of Social Norms
criminal Law
2.Agents of Control from 2.Agents of control are Societal
crime are Police and other pressure or fear of God.
law enforcement agencies
3.Govt has the power to 3.Society has no coercive power
punish to punish
4.Crime is considered as 4.Deviance is not considered as
Severe in Nature severe nature
5.Crime is defined by law 5.Deviance defined by society
members
6.Examples of crime 6.Homosexuality, Gambling,
murder, robbery, assault smoking etc
Causes of Deviance
Improper socialization (Orphans)/Illiterate parents
Lack of education
No religious education and morality
Rejection by neighbourhood
Deprive of basic facilities
Desire of accumulation of wealth
Media
1.Deviance by Bureaucrats
Deviance by bureaucrats is the most common problem in present
administration in India. It means illegal, immoral, and, unethical activities
towards their duties and norms of one’s profession. In modern period
bureaucrats misuse their powers, act against legal code of conduct for discharge
of public servant act for their personal benefit and it gives birth to corruption,
maladministration, inaction, delay in action, and abuse or misuse of power. In
this way bureaucrats become subject of official deviance. Because they act
against the official rule, conduct, code, moral and of course their duties towards
public and country. The relationship between deviant bureaucrats and corrupt
politicians is very common phenomenon in modern society.
Causes
1. Emergence of political elite who believes in interest-oriented rather than nation
oriented programs and policies.
2. Corruption is increasing in the society very rapidly because of the change in
the value system and ethical qualities of men.
3. Very low tolerance capability of people towards corruption.
4. Increasing population, widespread illiteracy and the poor economic
infrastructure lead to endemic corruption in public life.
5. Low salaries of government officials compel them to resort to the road of
corruption.
6. Complex procedures and laws alienate common people to ask for any help from
government.
7. Corruption is always on at its high level in election days. Big industrialists fund
politicians to meet high cost of election and ultimately to seek personal favour.
Act of Deviance:
1. Arrogant behaviour.
2. Stiff-necked attitude.
3. Arbitral behaviour.
4. Adhere to too much formalism.
5. Red-tapism (delay in action) to extract bribe.
6. Corruption.
7. Misappropriation of money and property.
8. Acquiring disproportionate wealth
Judicial Approach
In Prakash Singh Badal v. State of Punjab,2006 (10) SCR 197, Supreme Court
of India has expressed that if an accused is a public servant who has retired or
ceased to be a public servant then to prosecute him no sanction in terms of Section
19(1) of the Act is necessary.
In Subramanian Swami v. Manmohan Singh, AIR 2007 SC 18, it has been held
by the court that when an offence is committed by a public servant and he resigns
before cognizance is taken by the court, no prior sanction is needed.
2.Deviance by Legislators
The behaviour of Indian legislators both at the Centre and in the States leaves a
lot to be desired. Every time they act motivated by personal gain, they betray their
constituencies that elected them. Corruption in the assemblies as seen from this
perspective implies floor crossing, cash-for-vote, taking money or other benefits
to ask questions, framing rules under the influence of big corporate houses at the
cost of common people, etc.
Criminalization of politics is another facet of corruption. In the current
parliament, there are over a quarter MPs with criminal records, many with serious
charges, against them. It also highlights an area where electoral reform is urgently
needed so that criminals don’t enter in the parliament or state assemblies.
In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ram Singh, AIR 2000 SC 870, the
apex court express the views that, Prevalence of corruption is one of the problems
which our country has been facing from time immemorial. Corruption retards our
country’s growth and welfare to the maximum extent.
The Supreme Court of India in J. Jayalalithaa v. Union of India, AIR 1999 SC
1912, has held that “Corruption corrodes the moral fabric of the society and
corruption by public servant not only leads to the corruption of the moral fabric
of the society but is also harmful to the national economy and national interest,
as the person occupying high posts in government by misusing their powers due
to corruption can cause considerable damage to the national economy, national
interest and image of the country”.
3. Deviance by Judges
The judiciary, acts as an impartial watchdog but it does not have the power to
make any law. It can only interpret then laws passed by the law-makers under the
constitutional framework and give its verdicts accordingly. But when corruption
spreads in society, the governance begins to degrade implying loss of integrity
and efficiency. The corruption is an evil that destroys all the judicial functions,
such as dispute resolution, law enforcement, etc.
Corruption has been rampant in judiciary. There are many causes for its spreading
in Indian judiciary.
1. Judiciary of India depends on inputs and other material facts to decide the
merits of a case. These are thoroughly analysed by judges and judgment is
pronounced. If the judges allow false testimony to be recorded as evidence,
can true justice really be delivered in such cases?
2. The Indian judicial officers are very smart. However, one rarely notices
courts ordering the registration of a case of perjury. Inaction against wrong
doers will invariably encourage others to commit such illegal acts in the
courts. Serious consideration needs to be given to the fact that the initiation
of criminal cases against perjurers would result in long-term gains.
Causes of Deviance in Court
1. Delay in Justice
2. Inaccessibility
3. Misuse of power
In Sub-Committee on Judicial v JusticV.Ramaswamy,1995 SCC(1) 5-
The first case to come up with the issue to impeach a judge. The reason behind
initiating this motion was severe irregularities in financial matters committed by
Punjab and Haryana High Court judge. Expectedly, the impeachment was
unsuccessful and incomplete because it was not supported by Congress MPs
Justice Y.K Sabharwal-: R.K Sabharwal and ors v. State of Punjab,1995 AIR
1371
The judge misused his official position to promote his sons’ business which was
involves in a scam. The judge was then charged by the Central Vigilance
Commission in 2008. The sons of the judge were Involved in Ghaziabad
Provident Fund Scam. The impeachment proceeding was aborted yet again in
fructuously.
In 2011, Soumitra Sen a former judge of Kolkata H.C became the first judge in
India to be impeached for misappropriation of funds.
PROFESSIONAL DEVIANCE
(Deviance by Teachers, Journalists, Engineers, Doctors and Lawyers))
Every profession has code of conduct, conditions, rules and ethics. If any act
violates such rules, etc., it is called as professional deviance. Professions
includes: legal, medical, journalism, education, engineer, architect etc.
Causes of professional deviances
Majority of people in India are poor, illiterate and backward, hence they
easily get exploited by the professionals.
Support from politicians – in return they finance the politicians during the
election.
Client satisfaction by hook or crook.
Accumulation of wealth by illegal means to meet for future uncertain
needs for their children.
1. Deviance by Teachers
There are teachers who are involved in corruption themselves. Teachers of
private schools and colleges collecting large sum in the name of donations
from the rich parents. In Govt. Schools and Colleges money is collected as
fees for the seats. They also collect money from students by assuring them
success through various legal ways. The teachers of the government colleges
earn huge amounts of money apart from their salary through private tution ,
though they are banned from doing so. These dishonest practices have
damaged the standard of education in India to such an extent that it is causing
an irreparable loss to the young generation and also degradation in respect for
a teacher in the society has suffered.
2. Deviance by Journalists
Journalism is the activity of gathering, assessing, creating, and presenting news and
information. Professional journalists are found involving in corruptions like extracting money
from the rich and influential persons by black mailing them to expose them by publishing
their various weakness, which if come to light shall cause their downfall or may
deteriorate their reputation or many defame them. The main victims of such
journalists are mainly political leaders, public servants etc. involved in various
scandals. These journalists have vested interest and tend to misuse the power
provided to them by the media.
3. Deviance by engineers
`In this profession corrupt dealing with contractors and suppliers, passing of
substandard workers and material and maintenance of bogus records of work
charged labour are some of the common examples of deviance in this field.
Scandals of this kind are reported in newspapers and magazines regularly
regarding construction of building, roads, canals, dams and bridges with sub
standard material not only endanger public safety but also results into huge loss
to public exchequer, the government which definitely reflects back on the people
of India.
Despite the secular and religiously tolerant constitution of India, broad religious
representation in various aspects of society including the government, the active
role played by autonomous bodies such as National Human Rights Commission
of India and National Commission for Minorities, and the ground-level work
being done by non-governmental organisations, sporadic and sometimes serious
acts of religious violence tend to occur as the root causes of religious violence
often run deep in history, religious activities, and politics of India.
Medical Profession
Professional deviance is adoption of such practice by professional which is not
expected to adopt. Every Profession has some code of conduct, to be followed by
such professionals. In simple words professional deviance denotes those activities
which do not conform to the norms and expectations of the members of a
particular profession.
Medical profession is the noble profession as it directly concerns with saving the
life of human being. Earlier doctors were treated like God by “thankful patients”
who think them as Saviours of human race. With increasing general health and
legal awareness doctor- patient relationship have no longer been a healthy
relationship and transformed into a service provider and consumer relationship.
But, sometimes it has been heard about commission of illegal acts by medical
professional violating their professional and legal norms. Deviate from their
ethics and use wrong methods in their medical practice and forget the
humanitarian aspect of their profession and perform certain unethical acts during
the course of their professional and legal norms.
The JJ Hospital tragedy took place because the FDA (Food and Drug
Administration) granted an illegal licence to Alpana Pharma, supplier of the
killer drug glycerol, without ensuring that basic regulations were complied
with. At that time there were only four government-owned drug-testing
laboratories in the country and in order to cope with the huge workload the
government appointed ‘government approved’ private laboratories that
certified the purity of drugs. One such was Chem Med Laboratory that
certified Alpana Pharma’s killer glycerol as being of standard quality without
conducting the required tests. This company enjoyed special protection of
FDA officials who had been wined and dined by the owners
The commission revealed certain facts
1.Between February and July 1987 around 300 formulations were found to be
substandard and yet they continued to be sold
2.More than 20 percent substandard drug samples were found and yet the FDA
took no action
The Lentin Commission of Inquiry had highlighted how the safety and quality
of drugs produced in Maharashtra, where 29 per cent of the country’s
manufacturing and sales units are based, must urgently undergo scrutiny and
reform. The commission found that the ‘government machinery was utilised
by these politicians to extort money from the drugs industry to inflate the coffers
of private trusts with which the ministers were associated.’ The findings of the
Lentin Commission are important not just for Maharashtra’s public health system
but also for other states, as the majority of the drugs produced in India are
manufactured in Maharashtra and patients from across the country come here for
tertiary treatment. The commission found that far from regulating and imposing
standards on the drug industry, the FDA had wilfully allowed substandard drugs
to be sold in the market. The commission undertook a detailed investigation into
the manner in which the FDA functioned, both in terms of licensing and
controlling the standard of drugs produced.
Recommendations of the Lentin Commission:
Urgent reform and scrutiny of medicine manufacturing and supplying
units.
Increase of transparency in the system of drug administration.
Prevention of circulation of banned drugs in Maharashtra as well as in
entire India.
Constitution of a strict Vigilance Commission.
Reducing drug dependence on Maharashtra.
The accusation put forwarded by the commission were not accepted by many.
The health minister, Bhai Sawant resigned. The commission report was criticized
for revealing what it revealed. However, the Lentin commission has ultimately
revealed the corruption of high level officials, ministers, and the drug industry.
LEGAL PROFESSION
Legal profession is a noble profession. As it is said, “As justice is the great interest
of men on earth and as the lawyer is the high priest at the shrine of justice.
Lawyers can perform well only if they maintain certain ethical moral standards
Ethics are rules and regulations based on moral grounds. Every profession has its
code of conduct which is to be adhered to. Deviation from this code of conduct is
professional deviance. Lawyers are admitted as officers of the court and therefore
have an obligation to serve the court and the administration of justice. The ethical
responsibilities of the Advocates can be
1.Duties owed to the client
2.Duties owed to the court
The laws governing legal profession in India are:
The Legal Practitioners Act, 1879
The Indian Bar Council Act, 1926
The Advocates Act. 1961
Crime committed by the lawyers is called ‘Professional Misconduct’ under the
Advocates Act, 1961
The term “Professional Misconduct” was defined in the case of George Frier
Grahame v. Attorney General Fizi (1936.p.c.224. FIJI )as an act of deceiving
the clients and defraud the Court and the opposite party or the counsel.
The sections 35 and 36 of the Act empowers the State Bar Council and the Bar
Council of India needs to take disciplinary action against the lawyers who are
guilty of professional malfeasance as well as any other kind of misconducts
In Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M. V. Dabholkar reported in (1975) 2 SCC
702, 1976 AIR 242, 1976 SCR Bar Council of Maharashtra 2) 48]
It held that unless the three elements were satisfied it could not be said that an
advocate had acted beyond the standard or professional conduct and etiquette
(1) there is a socially valued function that needs to be fulfilled by the lawyer.
(2) The lawyer may be a trained professional who is accountable for carrying out
that obligation;
(3) His behaviour as a knowledgeable person is controlled both by himself and,
more formally, by the profession as a whole
Forms of Deviance
Fabrication of false evidences.
Engaging professional witnesses and false security.
Violating professional ethics and using dilatory tactics in collusion with
Court Staff.
Chamber practice – settlement of case in consideration of huge sum of
money by lawyers.
There are criminal lawyers who arrange professional alibies, cooked
witnesses for the gangsters.
Even the lawyers have their own trusted police officers who help them
personally by taking heavy bribe.
The IO and Medical Officers can be managed by the lawyers to help
win their case.
Manage opposite lawyers by payment of money.
Sometimes finance is provided for filing litigation against any reputed
and rich person.
Asking indecent and irrelevant questions to the rape victims during
cross examination to embarrass her.
Bar Council of India.
The Bar Council of India was established under section -4 of the Advocates
Act,1961
It prescribes standards for professional conduct, etiquettes, and exercises
disciplinary jurisdiction over the bar.
Functions
1. To lay down standards of professional conduct and etiquette for advocates.
2.To promote and support law reform
Disciplinary Committee
The Disciplinary Committee looks into discipline matters and complaints made
by people against advocates, especially for professional misconduct, and also
indulges into disciplinary matters of the state bar councils. S.9 of the Advocates
Act 1961 empowers the state Bar Councils to constitute one or more Disciplinary
Committees
Each Disciplinary Committee shall consist of 3 members. Two shall be selected
from the members of the Bar Council and one shall be selected from the
Advocates who are having more than 10 years of standing in profession. Among
the three members the senior most in the profession shall act as the chairman of
the committee.
Powers: S.42 of the Advocates Act deals with the power of Disciplinary
committee. It provides that the Disciplinary Committee of the State Bar Council
shall have the same powers same like the civil court under the C.P.C.
All the proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of a Bar Council shall be
deemed to a judicial proceeding within the meaning of S.193 & 228 of Cr.P.C
and every such disciplinary Committee shall be deemed to be a civil court.
S.35 of the Advocates Act should be followed.
1. On perusal of the complaint, if the Bar council is satisfied that it is a fit case
for enquiry then the complaint shall be referred for enquiry to the Disciplinary
Committee.
2. The Disciplinary Committee shall fix a date for enquiry and shall send notice
to the concerned Advocate e and the Advocate General of the State.
3 The Advocate charged with the professional misconduct shall appear in person
or through the Lawyer. Similarly, the Advocate general also appear in person or
through a lawyer.
4. The Disciplinary Committee should complete the enquiry proceedings within
one year from the date of receipt of the complaint. Due to any reason, if the
enquiry was not completed within one year then the complaint should be referred
to the Bar Council of India for its disposal.
5. During the pendency of the enquiry if the term of the Disciplinary Committee
comes to an end then the successor committee shall continue the enquiry.
6. After the enquiry due to the lack of majority opinion or otherwise if the
Disciplinary Committee was unable to take a final decision then they shall seek
the opinion of the chairman of the bar council and shall pass the final order
following his opinion.
Selected opinion of disciplinary committee of the bar council of India on
professional misconduct
1.Allahabad Bank Vs. Girish Prasad Verma BCI Tr. Case No. 49/1993
The disciplinary committee of the Uttar Pradesh Bar Council held that the
advocate had misappropriated the court fee paid to him by the complainant and
hence ordered for striking off the advocates name from the roll of Uttar Pradesh
Bar Council.
2.Jagadish Singh & other v. T.C. Sharma BCI TR Case No.47/1990
Jagadish Singh and others were employees of the Central Board of Education,
New Delhi. They were arbitrarily dismissed from service by the Board. They
approached T.C. Sharma an Advocate to file a case against the arbitrary dismissal.
They paid Rs.1400 as fees for the case.
Sharma gave a fake case number starting that he has field the case before the
central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi. On verification it was found that no
such case has been field. Later they engaged another Advocate Mr. Bhati to file
the case and got a favourable order of reinstatement.
Therefore, they asked the return of Rs.1400 from T.C. Sharma. He refused to pay
the same. So, the complainant filed a petition against him before the Delhi Bar
Council alleging professional misconduct. Since Sharma failed to appear during
the enquiry, the state Bar Council could not able to dispose of the case within one
year.
Hence, the case was transferred to the Bar Council of India. The Bar Council of
India examined the petitioners, but the respondent was absent. Finally, the Bar
council of India passed an order holding the respondent guilty of professional
misconduct and awarded the following punishments.
1. Suspended him from practice for a period of 5 years.
2. Directed him to return the Rs.1400/-with 12%interest per annum.
3. Directed to give Rs.500 as cost to the complainant.