( ) Ebs - Unit 005 - 250419 022712 2
( ) Ebs - Unit 005 - 250419 022712 2
1. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-1] ② a new way of eating took shape as dietary habits
evolved
There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at
thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work ③ improved breeds of cattle and other livestock were
chosen
regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are
indisputably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent ④ this marked humans’ transition to raising animals for
they are an approximation, what are their limits of food
validity, do they take into account such details as ⑤ a system of communal labor was put in place to
quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of organize collective work
course they don’t). But the most basic scientific
concept that is clearly and disturbingly missing from
today’s social and political discourse is the concept that 3. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은
some questions . Such questions can be
것은? [5-3]
called “scientific” and their answers represent truth. The primary impetus of scientific and technical
Scientific questions are not easy to ask. Their answers innovation has been our increased ability to reach out
can be validated by experiment or observation, and and exchange ideas with others, as well as to borrow
they can be used to improve your life, create jobs and other people’s ideas, and blend them with our own to
technologies, save the planet. You don’t need pollsters create something new. ① Combinatorial creativity is
or randomized trials to determine if a parachute works. the acknowledgment that nothing is genuinely unique,
You need an understanding of the facts of at least not in the sense of being constructed entirely
aerodynamics and the methodology to do experiments. from scratch. That notion is met with considerable ②
* aerodynamics:공기 역학 ** quantum entanglement: resistance in creative spaces. To create is to start with
양자 얽힘 *** parachute: 낙하산 a blank canvas. However, much data exists to ③
contradict this ecosystem of influences and
① lead to unambiguous results inspirations. Nina Paley, an artist, shot and animated
② are always open to refinement ancient relics from the Metropolitan Museum of Art to
illustrate her point that all creation is ④ derivative.
③ yield unnecessary controversy Every work of art is a derivative work. In animation,
④ often depend on empirical data Oliver Laric examines the ⑤ reappropriation of images
⑤ offer culturally relative answers in his video essay “Versions” by looking at how Disney
recycles animation. Creativity is the original open-
source code.
* impetus: 동력 ** relic: 유물 *** reappropriation: 재전유
2. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-2]
When a community stopped hunting female wild cattle,
those herds would, over time, tolerate the closer
presence of humans. By watching the wild cattle, as 4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-4]
our deep ancestors watched predators and learned
about their lives, these more recent ancestors could
have begun to understand the life cycle of the wild
cattle and made a few risky, but creative, ventures.
They started bringing a few, as youngsters, into the
villages, building pens and trying to keep them alive,
and they succeeded. They’d been watching the cattle
across generations ― they knew about their life cycles,
shared that information with one another, and
collaboratively came up with ideas about raising their
own cattle ― and thus . Once
cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were living with
humans, it was a simple task to do, like with dogs, a
bit of behavioral and morphological shaping via direct
manipulation (for wool, milk production, or rapid
growth for meat). The selection of specific individuals
to breed was an initial step toward modern domestic
animals. And hamburgers.
* morphological: 형태의, 형태학의
① efficient methods for hunting were gradually developed
너른터 -1- nernter.com
구매] 고등 EBS 수능특강 - Unit 005 - 250419 022712 2
[
Freud long ago distinguished between the conscious ① differing opinions on how cultural relativism shapes
stereotypes
and the unconscious minds. But today’s understanding
of the unconscious mind is not Freud’s seething ② significance of social aspects in addressing scientific
questions
unconsciousness, with its repressed impulses and
instincts. It’s a cooler and bigger information ③ explicit features distinguishing science from social
processing system. Our memory, thinking, language, discourse
attitudes, and perceptions all operate on these two ④ nature of scientific truth that can be explored in political
tracks ― a conscious, deliberate “high road” and an studies
unconscious, automatic “low road.” Our high-road mind ⑤ usefulness of approximation in understanding
is reflective; our low-road mind is intuitive. Consider complexities of aerodynamics
driving: Your brain and hands know how to move into
the right lane. But if you are like most drivers, you
can’t consciously explain how you do it. Most drivers 6.다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은? [5-2]
say they would turn right, then straighten out. But that When a community stopped ① hunting female wild
would steer them off the road. Actually, after moving cattle, those herds would, over time, tolerate the
right, you reverse the steering wheel equally to the left closer presence of humans. By watching the wild
of center, and only then return to the center position. cattle, as our deep ancestors watched predators and
But no worries, your low-road-guided hands know how learned about their lives, these more recent ancestors
to do it. In this way, the unconscious mind is like ② could have begun to understand the life cycle of the
. wild cattle and made a few risky, but creative,
* seething: 소용돌이치는, 야단법석하는 ventures. They started bringing a few, as youngsters,
into the villages, building pens and trying to keep them
① an unreliable, chaotic force that leads us astray ③ alive, and they succeeded. They’d been watching the
② a clear and intentional system that follows precise rules cattle across generations ― they knew about their life
cycles, shared that information with one another, and
③ a hidden companion, guiding our actions without us collaboratively came up with ideas about ④ raising
noticing
their own cattle ― and thus prey domestication was
④ an extra layer of judgment that consciously decides our born. Once cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were
actions
living with humans, it was a simple task to do, like
⑤ an active, wild force that constantly disrupts conscious with dogs, a bit of behavioral and morphological
thinking
shaping via direct manipulation (for wool, milk
production, or rapid growth for meat). The selection of
specific individuals to breed ⑤ were an initial step
5. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-1] toward modern domestic animals. And hamburgers.
There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at * morphological: 형태의, 형태학의
thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work
regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are
indisputably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent
they are an approximation, what are their limits of 7. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은? [5-3]
validity, do they take into account such details as
quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of
course they don’t). But the most basic scientific
concept that is clearly and disturbingly missing from
today’s social and political discourse is the concept that
some questions have correct and clear answers. Such
questions can be called “scientific” and their answers
represent truth. Scientific questions are not easy to
ask. Their answers can be validated by experiment or
observation, and they can be used to improve your life,
create jobs and technologies, save the planet. You
don’t need pollsters or randomized trials to determine
if a parachute works. You need an understanding of
the facts of aerodynamics and the methodology to do
experiments.
* aerodynamics:공기 역학 ** quantum entanglement:
양자 얽힘 *** parachute: 낙하산
The primary impetus of scientific and technical today’s social and political discourse is the concept ③
innovation ① has been our increased ability to reach that some questions have correct and clear answers.
out and exchange ideas with others, as well as to Such questions can be called “scientific” with their
borrow other people’s ideas, and blend them with our answers ④ represent truth. Scientific questions are not
own to create something new. Combinatorial creativity easy to ask. Their answers can be validated by
is the acknowledgment that nothing is genuinely experiment or observation, and they can be used to
unique, at least not in the sense of ② being improve your life, create jobs and technologies, save
constructed entirely from scratch. That notion ③ is met the planet. You don’t need pollsters or randomized
with considerable resistance in creative spaces. To trials to determine ⑤ whether a parachute works. You
create is to start with a blank canvas. However, much need an understanding of the facts of aerodynamics
data exists to support this ecosystem of influences and and the methodology to do experiments.
inspirations. Nina Paley, an artist, shot and animated * aerodynamics:공기 역학 ** quantum entanglement:
ancient relics from the Metropolitan Museum of Art to 양자 얽힘 *** parachute: 낙하산
illustrate her point ④ that all creation is derivative.
Every work of art is a derivative work. In animation,
Oliver Laric examines the reappropriation of images in 10. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-
his video essay “Versions” by looking at ⑤ what Disney 2]
recycles animation. Creativity is the original open-
When a community stopped hunting female wild cattle,
source code.
those herds would, over time, tolerate the closer
* impetus: 동력 ** relic: 유물 *** reappropriation: 재전유 presence of humans.
① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C) ① the role of emotional impulses in unconscious decision-
making
③ (B) - (C) - (A) ④ (C) - (A) - (B) ② unconscious actions solely driven by instinctual
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A) responses to stimuli
There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at The primary impetus of scientific and technical
thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work innovation has been our increased ability to reach out
regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are and exchange ideas with others, as well as to borrow
① undeniably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent other people’s ideas, and blend them with our own to
they are an approximation, what are their limits of ② create something new.
applicability, do they take into account such details as
quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of
(A) Every work of art is a derivative work. In
course they don’t). But the most basic scientific
animation, Oliver Laric examines the reappropriation of
concept that is clearly and disturbingly ③ absent from
images in his video essay “Versions” by looking at how
today’s social and political discourse is the concept that
Disney recycles animation. Creativity is the original
some questions have correct and clear answers. Such
open-source code.
questions can be called “scientific” and their answers ④
(B) To create is to start with a blank canvas. However,
challenge truth. Scientific questions are not easy to
much data exists to support this ecosystem of
ask. Their answers can be ⑤ confirmed by experiment
influences and inspirations. Nina Paley, an artist, shot
or observation, and they can be used to improve your
and animated ancient relics from the Metropolitan
life, create jobs and technologies, save the planet. You
Museum of Art to illustrate her point that all creation is
don’t need pollsters or randomized trials to determine
derivative.
if a parachute works. You need an understanding of
(C) Combinatorial creativity is the acknowledgment
the facts of aerodynamics and the methodology to do
that nothing is genuinely unique, at least not in the
experiments.
sense of being constructed entirely from scratch. That
* aerodynamics:공기 역학 ** quantum entanglement:
notion is met with considerable resistance in creative
양자 얽힘 *** parachute: 낙하산 spaces.
* impetus: 동력 ** relic: 유물 *** reappropriation: 재전유
① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C)
14. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳 ③ (B) - (C) - (A) ④ (C) - (A) - (B)
은? [5-2]
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)
Once cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were living
with humans, it was a simple task to do, like with
dogs, a bit of behavioral and morphological shaping via
16. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳
direct manipulation (for wool, milk production, or rapid
growth for meat).
은? [5-4]
But that would steer them off the road.
Freud long ago distinguished between the conscious When a community stopped hunting female wild cattle,
and the unconscious minds. But today’s understanding those herds would, over time, tolerate the ①
of the unconscious mind is not Freud’s seething closer presence of humans. By watching the wild
unconsciousness, with its repressed impulses and cattle, as our deep ancestors watched predators and
instincts. It’s a cooler and bigger information learned about their lives, these more recent ancestors
processing system. Our memory, thinking, language, could have begun to understand the life cycle of the
attitudes, and perceptions all operate on these two wild cattle and made a few risky, but ② innovative,
tracks ― a conscious, deliberate “high road” and an ventures. They started bringing a few, as youngsters,
unconscious, automatic “low road.” Our high-road mind into the villages, building pens and trying to keep them
is reflective; our low-road mind is intuitive. ( ① ) ③ alive, and they succeeded. They’d been watching the
Consider driving: Your brain and hands know how to cattle across generations ― they knew about their life
move into the right lane. ( ② ) But if you are like most cycles, shared that information with one another, and
drivers, you can’t consciously explain how you do it. ( collaboratively came up with ideas about raising their
③ ) Most drivers say they would turn right, then own cattle ― and thus prey domestication was born.
straighten out. ( ④ ) Actually, after moving right, you Once cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were living
reverse the steering wheel equally to the left of center, with humans, it was a ④ demanding task to do, like
and only then return to the center position. ( ⑤ ) But with dogs, a bit of behavioral and morphological
no worries, your low-road-guided hands know how to shaping via direct manipulation (for wool, milk
do it. production, or rapid growth for meat). The ⑤ selection
* seething: 소용돌이치는, 야단법석하는 of specific individuals to breed was an initial step
toward modern domestic animals. And hamburgers.
* morphological: 형태의, 형태학의
17. 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-
1] 19. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳
There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at 은? [5-3]
thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work However, much data exists to support this ecosystem
regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are of influences and inspirations.
indisputably true.
20. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않 understanding the importance of specific questions.
은 것은? [5-4] Taylor: ⓓ highlights the benefits that we can enjoy
Freud long ago ① differentiated between the conscious when we acknowledge scientifically validated facts.
and the unconscious minds. But today’s understanding Billy: The author mentions ⓔ to illustrate that some
of the unconscious mind is not Freud’s seething truths are self-evident and do not require statistical
unconsciousness, with its repressed impulses and validation.
instincts. It’s a cooler and bigger information Kelly: The author mentions ⓕ to point out that
processing system. Our memory, thinking, language, scientific facts are determined through evidence,
attitudes, and perceptions all ② work on these two rather than opinions or surveys.
tracks ― a conscious, deliberate “high road” and an
unconscious, automatic “low road.” Our high-road mind [정답]
is ③ introspective; our low-road mind is intuitive.
Consider driving: Your brain and hands know how to
move into the right lane. But if you are like most
drivers, you can’t ④ unconsciously explain how you do
it. Most drivers say they would turn right, then
straighten out. But that would steer them off the road.
Actually, after moving right, you ⑤ turn the steering
wheel equally to the left of center, and only then return
to the center position. But no worries, your low-road-
guided hands know how to do it.
* seething: 소용돌이치는, 야단법석하는
22. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은? [5-3] A: "Freud talked about the conscious and
The primary impetus of scientific and technical unconscious minds, right?"
innovation has been our increased ability to reach out B: "Yes, but today we understand the unconscious
and exchange ideas with others, as well as to borrow as more of an information-processing system, not
other people’s ideas, and blend them with our own to just (A) r instincts."
create something new. Combinatorial creativity is the A: "How does that work?"
acknowledgment that nothing is genuinely unique, at B: "We use two levels: the conscious 'high road'
least not in the sense of being constructed entirely and the unconscious 'low road.' For example, when
from scratch. That notion is met with considerable you drive, you don’t consciously think about
resistance in creative spaces. To create is to start with steering — it just happens (B) a ."
a blank canvas. However, much data exists to support A: "So, it's like your mind knows what to do without
this ecosystem of influences and inspirations. Nina you thinking about it?"
Paley, an artist, shot and animated ancient relics from B: "Exactly! You can't consciously explain the
the Metropolitan Museum of Art to illustrate her point details, but your low-road mind (C) i guides
that all creation is derivative. Every work of art is a us to steer properly."
derivative work. In animation, Oliver Laric examines
the reappropriation of images in his video essay
“Versions” by looking at how Disney recycles
animation. Creativity is the original open-source code.
* impetus: 동력 ** relic: 유물 *** reappropriation: 재전유
① criticism of the current animation industry
② the necessity of creativity in scientific research
③ disagreements on the definition of derivative works
④ the difficulty of distinguishing original works from
copies
24. 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳 ① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C)
은? [5-1] ③ (B) - (C) - (A) ④ (C) - (A) - (B)
Scientific questions are not easy to ask. ⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)
There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at
thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work
regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are
indisputably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent
they are an approximation, what are their limits of
validity, do they take into account such details as
quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of
course they don’t). ( ① ) But the most basic scientific
concept that is clearly and disturbingly missing from
today’s social and political discourse is the concept that
some questions have correct and clear answers. ( ② )
Such questions can be called “scientific” and their
answers represent truth. ( ③ ) Their answers can be
validated by experiment or observation, and they can
be used to improve your life, create jobs and
technologies, save the planet. ( ④ ) You don’t need
pollsters or randomized trials to determine if a
parachute works. ( ⑤ ) You need an understanding of
the facts of aerodynamics and the methodology to do
experiments.
* aerodynamics:공기 역학 ** quantum entanglement:
양자 얽힘 *** parachute: 낙하산
(A) But that would steer them off the road. Actually,
after moving right, you reverse the steering wheel
equally to the left of center, and only then return to
the center position. But no worries, your low-road-
guided hands know how to do it.
(B) But today’s understanding of the unconscious mind
is not Freud’s seething unconsciousness, with its
repressed impulses and instincts. It’s a cooler and
bigger information processing system. Our memory,
thinking, language, attitudes, and perceptions all
operate on these two tracks ― a conscious, deliberate
“high road” and an unconscious, automatic “low road.”
(C) Our high-road mind is reflective; our low-road
mind is intuitive. Consider driving: Your brain and
hands know how to move into the right lane. But if you
are like most drivers, you can’t consciously explain
how you do it. Most drivers say they would turn right,
then straighten out.
* seething: 소용돌이치는, 야단법석하는