Name of Head/Focal Person of School DRRM Team: Designation:

School ID: Name of School: Municipality/City:

Name of Division DRRM Coordinator: ISMAEL KRIS L. DELA CRUZ Division/Region: SDO ISABELA/REGION II
Date the Division DRRM Coordinator Oriented the SDRRM Team: TARGETS/ PLANS
Related
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
Sendai ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Global Comprehensive
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGET AREAS (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and YES
(SFDRR) NO
School DRRM Manual)
Priorities
Priority for Legal Frameworks & 1 Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM in (2021-2023)
Action 2 Policies education/school safety
(2020)
Organizational 2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person
Priority for arrangements, leadership, 3 Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from different
Action 2 and coordination for risk offices; with defined membership and roles and
reduction and resilience responsibilities/functions
4 Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA and
EiE measures, covering risk assessment, risk reduction, and
Integration of risk reduction
rehabilitation and recovery
Priority for and resilience into
Action 1 education sector strategies, 5 Students participated in the planning process
policies and plans 6 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS
8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget
Funding for risk reduction 9 Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster or
Priority for emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
and resilience of education
Action 3
sector 10 School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its DRRM
programs and activities, including those after a disaster

Page 1 of
 11 Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO
23 s 2015)
12 Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard
Priority for Child-centered Risk mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Action 1 Assessment 13 Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with the
community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
14 School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps
with education data to better understand the school’s risk
15 School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report (RADAR)
to the DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after the onslaught of
a hazard in the area
Priority for 16 Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on
Monitoring and Evaluation DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact exist
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 2 of
 PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS

Division/Region: SDO ISABELA/REGION II

ABLING ENVIRONMENT

(2021) (2022) (2023)

Page 3 of
Page 4 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and NO.
1 # of school buildings that has been inventoried
Assessment and
Priority for prioritization for retrofiting 2 # of school buildings with risk assessment
Action 1 and replacement of unsafe
schools 3 # of unsafe school buildings identified

YES NO
4 Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building
construction
5 Financial exist are allocated for completion of needed action to
resources
Resources and Plan to
Priority for address unsafe school buildings within a specified period
address unsafe school
Action 3
buildings 6 # of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action undertaken by
the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.)
7 Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of facilities
conducted (state
8 Undertaken how
regular often)
repair of minor classroom (including facilities)
damages
Maintenance to increase
Priority for 9 Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
safety and protection of
Action 3 documented and assigned
investments in schools
10 School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of
school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
11 School Heads have identified those schools that are expected to be
used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters
Planning for limited use of 12 School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the school in
Priority for schools as evacuation camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per Joint
Action 4 centers, during the school Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013 "Guidelines on
year Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA 10821
"Children's Emergency Relief and Protection Act" and its
corresponding IRR

Every new school built is safe

13 Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
Priority for Guidance and regulations safe school site selection
Action 2 for safe school construction resilient design, and
resilient construction
14 New school construction is monitored for compliance with:
Monitoring of safe school safe school site selection
Priority for
site selection, design and safe school design
Action 2
construction
safe school construction

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 5 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and YES NO
School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned into
1 response actions when a disaster strikes (This could be a separate
section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in every
2 instructional classroom
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in case
3 of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio, generator,
etc.)
Existence of national and School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary Learning
4 spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster
sub-national plans for
preparedness and School has ready resumption strategies and alternative delivery
Priority for 5 modes to ensure education continuity
response, educational
Action 4
continuity, and protection of
education sector School has ensured that students completed the Family Earthquake
investments 6 Prepareness Plan; and school has reported completion to DepEd
DRRM at the Central Office
School has established a school personnel tracking system/protocol
7 in the event of a disaster

School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students and

8 personnel

9 School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and students

School has trained teachers and other personnel who could provide
10 psychosocial support to students

School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are reviewed
Annual review of school 11 annually
disaster risk reduction and
Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and
Priority for management measures (e.g. 12
preparedness measures are in place as per DO
Action 4 as part of school-based
management and/or school Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders participated in
improvement) 13 Brigada Eskwela

School has established functional early warning system to inform

students and personnel of hazards and emergencies (protocol,
14 warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national and LGU
warning systems and protocols
Conduct of regular
simulation drill, at all levels, School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3 hazards)
Priority for to practice response 15 with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, NGOs,
Action 4 preparedness and to review community, PTA, alumni, and others)
response plans (i.e.
Contingency Plan) 16 # of students who participated in the drills
17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures
School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
18 disseminated to students, teachers and parents

School Head has received DRRM training from division or region or

19 partners
Needs assessment,
strategy, and School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from division or
20 region or partners (indicate how many)
Priority for implementation plan to
Action 3 develop staff and student
capacity for participation in
school based DRRM
Page 6 of
 Needs assessment,
strategy, and
Priority for implementation plan to
Action 3 develop staff and student School has conducted awareness and capacity building for families
capacity for participation in 21 and learners
school based DRRM
School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the
22
LGU

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 7 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS 1 School has integrated (Based onand
key DRR DepEd’s DRRM Policies
CCA concepts in the and
YES NO
curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guide
Integration of common risk 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
Priority for
reduction and resilience
Action 3 3 Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated
messages in the curriculum
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through
measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes YES NO

4 Percentage of students actively participating in various

Intergration of risk DRRM/CCA/EiE activities
Priority for
reduction and resilience in
Action 3
extra-curricular activities

5 School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and school
Capacity building for and personnel YES NO
Priority for
personnel on risk reduction
Action 3 6 Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA
and resilience education YES NO

7 Schoo has available and accessible quality and up-to-date DRRM YES NO
8 materials
Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in it,
in every classroom YES NO

Priority for 9 School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess sustainable
Monitoring and Evaluation implementation YES NO
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 8 of