Scribd
Upload
5 views17 pages

IHR Law Assignment

The document is an assignment on the case A v. Australia, submitted to Dr. Digvijay Katoch by Saumya Goswami as part of a law course. It includes sections on the introduction, relevant provisions, facts of the case, issues, application of law, judgment, analysis, critique, and information about the United Nations Human Rights Committee. The assignment aims to explore service law terminologies and enhance understanding of international humanitarian and refugee law.

Uploaded by

Suruchi Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views17 pages

IHR Law Assignment

The document is an assignment on the case A v. Australia, submitted to Dr. Digvijay Katoch by Saumya Goswami as part of a law course. It includes sections on the introduction, relevant provisions, facts of the case, issues, application of law, judgment, analysis, critique, and information about the United Nations Human Rights Committee. The assignment aims to explore service law terminologies and enhance understanding of international humanitarian and refugee law.

Uploaded by

Suruchi Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Page |1

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN AND REFUGEE LAW

10th SEMESTER ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION

TOPIC:

A V. A USTRALIA , CCPR/C/59/D/560/1993, 30 APRIL 1997


(UN H UMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE )

Submitted to: Submitted by:


Dr. Digvijay Katoch Saumya Goswami
Assistant Professor [Law] B.B.A. L.L.B. (Hons.) 10th Semester
Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla Enrollment no. 1120202120
Page |2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would love to put a conversational expression of gratitude to Dr. Digvijay Katoch, Professor (Law),
at National Law University, Shimla, for providing me an opportunity through this project to explore
Service Law terminologies under the topic; A v. Australia, (UN Human Rights Committee thereby
helping me assimilate within and pick up on it. I believe this will help me understand better and get an
enhanced hang on suits pertaining to this area of the International Humanitarian and Refugee Law,
through this project analyzation.

I hereby declare that this project work is original and is neither published nor under consideration
anywhere else.

DATE: Saumya Goswami


15/04/2025 B.B.A. L.L.B (Hons.
Page |3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. RELEVANT PROVISION

A. NATURE AND SCOPE OF ARTICLE 9

B. KEY PRINCIPLES IN ARTICLE 9

3. FACTS OF THE CASE

4. ISSUES IN THE CASE

5. APPLICATION OF LAW

6. JUDGEMENT

7. ANALYSIS OF THE CASE

8. CRITIQUE ON THE JUDGEMENT

9. CONCLUDING REMARKS

10. UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE

A. ORIGINS AND LEGAL BASIS

B. COMPOSITION

C. CORE FUNCTIONS AND PROCEDURES

D. THE COMMITTEE’S ENGAGEMENT WITH HUMANITARIAN-LAW CONTEXTS

E. IMPACT, CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS

F. CONCLUSIONS
Page |4

G.
Page |5
Page |6
Page |7
Page |8
Page |9
P a g e | 10
P a g e | 11
P a g e | 12
P a g e | 13
P a g e | 14
P a g e | 15
P a g e | 16
P a g e | 17

You might also like