VisionIAS Value Added Material Polity
VisionIAS Value Added Material Polity
www.visionias.in
POLITY
S.N. TOPIC PAGE NO.
1. Preface
2. Polity PYQs Analysis
3. Overview of Indian Constitution: Origins Evolution and 1-12
Core Principles
4. The Preamble 13-20
5. Citizenship 21-31
6. Fundamental Rights Directive Principles of State Policy and 32-74
Fundamental Duties
7. Separation of Powers Between Various Organs 75-82
8. Union and State Executive 83-101
9. Union and State Legislature 102-120
10. Indian Judiciary 121-136
11. Elections 137-165
12. Federalism 166-188
13. Local Self Governance 189-204
14. Constitutional Bodies 205-229
15. Quasi-Judicial Bodies 230-245
16. Regulatory Authorities in India 246-254
Preface
A Message to the Dedicated Mains 2025 Aspirant
Dear Aspirant,
Congratulations on conquering the first stage of the Civil Services Examination. The journey from Prelims to
Mains is a test of not just knowledge, but also of strategy, endurance, and smart work. We understand that
this crucial period is often marked by a sense of urgency and confusion. With a vast syllabus to cover and
limited time on the clock, you might find yourself asking: What should I read? What can I afford to skip? How
do I structure my preparation to gain a genuine competitive edge?
It is with a deep understanding of these challenges that we have crafted this Polity Value Added Material
(VAM) for Mains 2025. This document is not just another compilation of notes; it is a strategic tool designed
to be your trusted companion in navigating the complexities of the GS Paper 2 Polity section.
The Philosophy: Precision and Relevance through PYQ Analysis
The foundation of this VAM lies in a thoughtful and objective analysis of the UPSC Mains Polity questions
from 2013 to 2024. We believe that the surest way to understand the expectations of the examiner is to
meticulously study the questions they have asked over the past decade. This rigorous analysis has been the
guiding light in designing every aspect of this material.
At the very beginning of this document, we have provided a comprehensive macro-analysis of the PYQs. This
will offer you a bird's-eye view of the entire Polity syllabus, helping you to intelligently allocate your time and
energy by understanding the relative importance of various themes.
Furthermore, each theme within the document is prefaced with a micro-level PYQ analysis. This will guide
you on the specific sub-topics to focus on, the nature of questions asked, and how to approach each theme to
maximize your score.
How Will This Document Empower Your Mains Preparation?
Our primary goal is to equip you with the content and confidence to write high-scoring answers. This VAM is
structured to achieve three key objectives:
1. Revise Core Content Efficiently: The material is designed to facilitate a quick and effective revision of
the core constitutional and political concepts that you have already studied for the Prelims. It ensures
your foundational knowledge is sharp and ready for application.
2. Provide High-Impact Value Addition: Moving beyond the basics, this document provides curated,
value-added content for each theme. This includes critical analysis, relevant committee
recommendations, important judgments, and contemporary viewpoints that will help you enrich your
answers and stand out from the competition.
3. Cover High-Probability Current Affairs Themes: We recognize that Mains is increasingly dynamic.
Therefore, we have identified and comprehensively covered key themes that have been prominent in
the news over the last few years. This proactive approach ensures you are well-prepared for
questions that connect static concepts with current events, a high-yield area in recent trends.
Our Commitment to Your Success
This document is a culmination of dedicated effort aimed at simplifying your preparation and maximizing your
output. We believe that with a clear strategy and the right resources, you can transform your hard work into
success. Trust the process, utilize this material to its fullest potential, and walk into the examination hall with
the confidence that you have prepared smartly.
The Polity section of General Studies Paper 2, as specified in the official UPSC syllabus, covers a broad range of
topics. The syllabus for this section includes the following:
2. The Preamble
• Discuss each adjective attached to the word 'Republic' in the 'Preamble'. Are they defendable in the
present circumstances? (2016, 12.5 marks)
3. Citizenship
• (No direct questions from Citizenship)
7. Indian Judiciary
• Critically examine the Supreme Court's judgement on National Judicial Appointments Commission Act,
2014' with reference to appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India. (2017, 10 marks)
• The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in recent times. Highlight
the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.
(2020, 10 marks)
• Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity,
equity and inclusiveness. (2021, 10 marks)
• "Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy." Comment. (2023, 10
marks)
8. Federalism
• Many State Governments further bifurcate geographical administrative areas like Districts and Talukas for
better governance. In light of the above, can it also be justified that more number of smaller States would
bring in effective governance at State level? Discuss. (2013, 10 marks)
• Constitutional mechanisms to resolve the inter-state water disputes have failed to address and solve the
problems. Is the failure due to structural or process inadequacy or both? Discuss. (2013, 10 marks)
• Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features,
but it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre, a
feature that militates against the concept of strong federalism. Discuss. (2014, 12.5 marks)
• The concept of cooperative federalism has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. Highlight the
drawbacks in the existing structure and the extent to which cooperative federalism would answer the
shortcomings. (2015, 12.5 marks)
• Discuss the essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and anomalies, if any, that have led to
recent reported conflicts between the elected representatives and the institution of the Lieutenant
Governor in the administration of Delhi. Do you think that this will give rise to a new trend in the
functioning of the Indian federal politics? (2016, 12.5 marks)
• Whether the Supreme Court Judgement (July 2018) can settle the political tussle between the Lt.
Governor and elected government of Delhi? Examine. (2018, 15 marks)
• From the resolution of contentious issues regarding distribution of legislative powers by the courts,
'Principle of Federal Supremacy' and 'Harmonious Construction' have emerged. Explain. (2019, 10 marks)
• How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in
India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer. (2020, 10 marks)
• Indian Constitution exhibits centralising tendencies to maintain unity and integrity of the nation. Elucidate
in the perspective of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; The Disaster Management Act, 2005 and recently
passed Farm Acts. (2020, 15 marks)
• How have the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission of India enabled the States to improve
their fiscal position? (2021, 10 marks)
• The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe
within a particular State is being questioned by various States. However, the power of the States to
withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of
India. (2021, 15 marks)
• "While the national political parties in India favour centralisation, the regional parties are in favour of
State autonomy." Comment. (2022, 15 marks)
• Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by
the Union Governments since mid 1990s. (2023, 15 marks)
• What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations?
Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for
strengthening federalism. (2024, 15 marks)
SN Theme 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 20 Avg.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 24 weightage
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 of the
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 topic
1 Overview of 2 1 0 3 1 2 2 0 1 0 15 15 13.51%
Our 0 2 7 5 5 5 0
Constitution . .
- Origins, 5 5
Evolution,
Features,
Amendments
, Significant
Provisions
and Basic
Structure
2 The 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.96%
Preamble 2
.
5
3 Citizenship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
4 Fundamental 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 15 15 9.84%
Rights, 0 2 5 5 5 0
Directive .
Principles 5
7 Indian 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 10 15 4.25%
Judiciary 0 0 0
8 Federalism 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 1 15 15 13.70%
0 2 2 2 5 0 5 5 5
. . .
5 5 5
10 Separation of 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3.86%
Powers 5 0 5
11 Elections in 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 10 4.63%
India 0 5 0 5
12 Constitutiona 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 1 0 2 0 10 10.61%
l Bodies 2 5 5 5 5 5
.
5
13 Quasi- 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 10 6.95%
Judicial 2 2 5 5 0 5
Bodies . .
5 5
14 Regulatory 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 3.47%
Authorities 0 2 2
in India . .
5 5
By understanding these trends, students can strategize their preparation by building strong foundations in core
areas, developing analytical skills, staying updated with current affairs and judicial rulings relevant to Polity, and
practicing integrated answer writing.
1. Constitution................................................................................................................................ 3
4.1. Role of the British Rule in Shaping the Indian Constitution ................................................ 6
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Constitution
A Constitution is a document that serves as the fundamental law of a country, acting as the
rulebook that governs society and thus holds supreme legal importance. Key functions of the
constitution include:
• Expression of Ideology: It reflects the nation's ideology and philosophy. It also reflects the
people's faith and aspirations.
• Basic Law: It outlines fundamental laws, which can be amended or replaced.
• Organizational Framework: It defines the roles of the legislature, executive, and judiciary,
and their inter-relationships and limitations.
• Levels of Government: It explains the structure of government, whether federal,
confederation, or unitary.
• Amendment Provisions: It includes provisions for amendments to address future changes in
the constitution itself due to unforeseen circumstances.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
This lack of representation fuelled the desire for self-governance, eventually leading to the
creation of the Indian Constitution, reflecting aspirations for democracy and self-rule.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Constituent Assembly of India was formed in 1946 under the Cabinet
Mission Plan to draft a constitution for an independent India. Initially, it
comprised 389 members representing both British Indian provinces (292
members) and princely states (93 members), with an additional 4
members from Chief Commissioners' provinces like Delhi.
Following the partition of the country, the Assembly's membership was
reduced to 299 members (from the initial 389 members), yet it continued
its dual role: drafting the Constitution and legislating for India until the
first Union Parliament was elected in 1952.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Federal Structure and State Autonomy: The Government of India Act of 1935 introduced a federal
structure that balanced central authority with provincial autonomy. This principle of power-sharing
is reflected in India’s division of powers between the central and state governments, ensuring that
states have authority over certain matters.
• Electoral Process: The introduction of electoral processes by the British, including indirect and direct
elections, established a foundation for India’s comprehensive electoral system. The Indian
Constitution adopted direct elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, along with indirect
elections for the Rajya Sabha and the President.
• Judicial Independence and Rule of Law: The British-established judicial system introduced principles
of judicial independence and the rule of law, which became foundational to the Indian Constitution.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
It is said that every civilization emerges from the womb of previous civilizations. India remained
under British rule for two hundred years. During this period, the British shaped Indian polity and
government to suit their needs. Thus, we find many aspects of the Indian constitution and
political system, the roots of which can be traced to British rule.
Impact of GoI Act 1935 on Indian Constitution
The Government of India Act of 1935 is often considered a prototype for the Indian
Constitution due to the extensive overlap in structural and functional aspects. Here are the
main areas where the 1935 Act influenced the Constitution:
• Federal Structure: The 1935 Act introduced a federal structure, defining powers and
responsibilities for provinces and the central government. This model directly influenced
India’s federal framework, where powers are divided across central, state, and concurrent
lists.
• Provincial Autonomy: The 1935 Act granted provinces autonomy in local matters, an idea
that became the basis for state autonomy in India. The Constitution adopted a similar
power-sharing arrangement to respect regional diversity.
• Bicameral Legislature: The Act created a bicameral legislature with a Federal Assembly
and Council of States, mirroring the structure of the Indian Parliament, which has the Lok
Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
• Governor’s Role: The 1935 Act established the role of a Governor in provinces with
considerable powers, including executive authority and veto rights. The Indian
Constitution retained the position of the Governor, though with limited powers.
• Judiciary and Rule of Law: The 1935 Act’s Federal Court formed the basis for the Supreme
Court of India. Moreover, the Act’s emphasis on the rule of law and an independent
judiciary was incorporated into the Indian judicial system.
• Civil Services: The Indian Administrative Service and other civil services were structured
based on the All-India Services established by the 1935 Act, ensuring continuity in
administration.
• Electoral Processes: The Act’s provisions for direct elections to provincial legislatures,
albeit limited, were foundational to India’s adoption of universal adult franchise and a
structured electoral process in the Constitution.
While the Government of India Act, 1935, provided a structural prototype for the Indian
Constitution, it was not adopted wholesale. Elements like the conditional federation, limited
jurisdiction of the Federal Court, and the Governor’s overriding powers, which restricted
democratic autonomy, were rejected. Instead, India expanded key democratic elements of the
Act to ensure democracy, inclusivity, and equality, transforming the Act from a colonial tool
into a foundation for a sovereign nation.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Preamble .................................................................................................................................. 14
1.1.1. Sovereign.................................................................................................................... 15
1.1.1.1. Sovereignty and Commonwealth ...................................................................................... 15
1.1.1.2. Sovereignty and Globalization ........................................................................................... 15
1.1.7. Equality....................................................................................................................... 17
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN
SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
In Our Constituent Assembly this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do Hereby Adopt, Enact
and Give to Ourselves this Constitution.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Fraternity means a sense of brotherhood. According to the Preamble, fraternity assures two
things – the dignity of the individual and the integrity of the nation.
• The Constitution promotes this feeling of fraternity by the system of single citizenship.
• The Fundamental Duties (Art. 51A) puts a duty on every citizen to promote harmony and the
spirit of common brotherhood amongst all people of India transcending religious, linguistic,
regional and sectorial diversities.
The phrase ‘unity and integrity of the Trinity – Liberty Equality and Fraternity
nation’ embraces both psychological and According to Dr. BR Ambedkar, these principles
territorial dimensions of national of liberty, equality and fraternity are not to be
integration. It aims at overcoming treated as separate items in a trinity. They form
hindrances to national integration like a union of trinity in the sense that to divorce
communalism, regionalism, casteism, one from the other is to defeat the very purpose
secessionism etc. of democracy.
• Dr. Ambedkar believed that fraternity is • Without equality, liberty would produce
a crucial element of democracy and is the supremacy of the few over the many.
essential for the principles of liberty • Equality without liberty would kill
and equality to become a natural part of individual initiative.
society. • Without fraternity, liberty equality could
• According to K.M Munshi, the phrase not become a natural course of things
‘dignity of the individual’ signifies that
Political democracy cannot last unless there lies
the Constitution not only ensures
at the base of its social democracy.
material betterment and maintains a
democratic set-up, but it also recognizes that the personality of every individual is sacred.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts with no agreed definition as it
is an evolutionary concept. Justice means to give each and every person what they deserve. It
involves fair, moral, and impartial treatment of all persons and is the correct application of a law,
as opposed to ‘arbitrariness'.
• The term ‘justice’ as imbibed in the Preamble embraces three distinct forms –
o Social Justice: It denotes equal
treatment of all citizens without any Related Judgements
distinction based on caste, color, • In the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973),
race, religion, sex and so on. It means Supreme Court rejected its earlier position
absence of privileges to any section in Berubari Case 1960 and held that the
of the society while building in Preamble is a part of the Constitution and
appropriate provisions for the can be amended by the Parliament,
improvement of left-out sections of subject to basic structure doctrine.
society such as economically weaker • In Jacob M. Puthuparambil & Ors Vs.
sections, backward sections (SCs, STs Kerala Water Authority 1990, Supreme
and OBCs) and women. Court observed that:
o Economic Justice: It denotes non- o The Preamble promises socio-
discrimination between people on economic justice to all,
the basis of economic factors. It also o The fundamental rights confer certain
involves the elimination of glaring justiciable socio-economic rights.
inequalities in wealth, income and o The Directive Principles of State
property. Policy aims to fix the socio-economic
o Political justice: It implies that all goals which the State must strive to
citizens should have equal political attain.
rights, equal access to all political These 3 together constitute the core and
offices and equal voice in the conscience of the Constitution.
government. For example, • In Raghunathrao Ganpatrao vs UoI 1993,
provisions relating to 'Equal Justice Supreme Court held that Preamble cannot
and be regarded as a source of prohibition or
o Free Legal Aid' are enshrined under limitation on the power a legislature.
article 39A.
The ideal of justice has been secured through various provisions of the constitution, especially
fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Citizenship ................................................................................................................................ 22
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Citizenship
A citizen is an individual who, by virtue
of their legal status, is a recognized
member of a state or country and is
entitled to specific rights and
obligations as established by that
state.
Citizenship refers to the relationship
between a person and the state,
indicating their membership in a country’s
community. It can be defined as “the status
conferring full community membership with equal
rights and duties.” Citizenship is also referred to as
“the right to have rights.”
Citizenship in India is:
• Primarily governed by Articles 5 to 11 of the
Indian Constitution but does not contain
elaborate provisions on citizenship.
• Constitution has authorised the Parliament to
make laws pertaining to citizenship, leading to
the enactment of the Citizenship Act, 1955.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Benefits Limitations
1. Visa-Free Travel: No visa required to visit 1. No Employment Rights: PIOs cannot work
India for 15 years from the date of issue of in Government of India services.
the PIO card. 2. No Constitutional Office: They cannot
2. Exemption from Registration: No need to hold constitutional positions in the
register at FRRO/FRO for stays up to 180 Government of India.
days. 3. Prior Permission Required for
3. Parity with NRIs: Eligible for economic, undertaking activities such as
financial, educational, and housing mountaineering, missionary work,
benefits similar to NRIs, excluding research projects, and visiting restricted
agricultural or plantation properties. areas in India.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Lifetime Visa: OCI cardholders receive a 1. No Political Rights: OCIs cannot vote or
multi-entry, lifelong visa for India. hold legislative positions in India.
2. No Registration Requirement: They are 2. No Constitutional Posts: They are
exempt from registering with the Foreign ineligible for roles such as President,
Regional Registration Office (FRRO) or Foreign Vice President, Supreme Court or High
Registration Officer (FRO) regardless of their Court Judge.
stay's duration. 3. Restricted Employment: Generally,
3. Parity with Non-Resident Indians (NRIs): OCIs OCIs cannot hold government jobs.
have similar access to economic, financial, 4. Special Permissions Needed: OCIs
and educational facilities as NRIs, though must obtain prior permission for
they cannot purchase agricultural or missionary work, journalism, and
plantation land. Eg. Eligibility to enrol in NPS mountaineering.
on par with Non-resident citizens. 5. Protected/Restricted Areas: OCIs need
4. Eligibility for grant of Indian citizenship: After a Protected Area Permit (PAP) or
completion of 5 years as OCI cardholders. Restricted Area Permit (RAP) to enter
certain areas in India.
NOTE: In 2015, the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) and Person of Indian Origin (PIO) card
schemes were merged to simplify procedures and provide enhanced benefits for people of Indian
origin living abroad. This merger aimed to streamline the connection between the Indian
diaspora and their ancestral homeland.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Excessive Delegation: Critics say this provision gives too much power to the executive
branch, potentially putting the security and rights of OCI cardholders at risk.
• Legal Ambiguity: The lack of clear information about which laws could cause the
cancellation of OCI status has created uncertainty for many OCI holders regarding their
rights.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Dual citizenship refers to the status where an individual is recognized as a citizen of two countries
simultaneously. This concept allows a person to hold and exercise rights in both countries, such
as voting, owning property, and receiving state benefits.
India’s Stand on Dual Citizenship
• India does not currently permit dual citizenship.
• The Indian Constitution, under Article 9, explicitly states that a person who voluntarily
acquires the citizenship of any other country is no longer considered an Indian citizen.
• This is rooted in the belief that an individual should hold allegiance to only one country, and
dual citizenship could lead to conflicts of loyalty and legal complexities.
Arguments for Dual Citizenship in India Arguments Against Dual Citizenship in India
• Globalization and Migration: Dual • Loyalty and National Integrity: Dual
citizenship would allow Indians citizenship could create divided loyalties,
moving abroad for education, work, or potentially undermining national security
marriage to maintain strong ties with and integrity.
India while integrating into their new • Legal and Administrative Complexities: It
country. would require significant changes to India’s
• Diaspora Contributions: The Indian legal and administrative systems, including
diaspora is influential globally. Dual immigration, taxation, and criminal justice,
citizenship could strengthen their leading to bureaucratic challenges and
economic, cultural, and political possible misuse.
contributions to India. • Social and Cultural Concerns: There is
• Retention of Talent: Skilled concern that dual citizenship could dilute
professionals who migrate might cultural identity and social cohesion, as
prefer to keep their Indian citizenship. citizens with ties to another country might
Dual citizenship could encourage them not fully integrate into Indian society,
to stay connected and contribute to causing potential divisions.
India's growth. • Political Concerns: Granting dual citizenship
• National Security: In international could allow external influences in India’s
crises, citizens with dual nationality political affairs, particularly if a large number
can serve as a bridge between nations, of dual citizens participate in elections or
fostering dialogue and protecting both hold significant power.
countries' interests.
While India may not immediately adopt dual citizenship, there are discussions about expanding
the rights and privileges of OCI holders, or introducing a limited form of dual citizenship with
strict conditions and safeguards. This could be a middle path, allowing for greater engagement
with the diaspora while addressing concerns of loyalty and national integrity.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Digital Citizenship
Digital citizenship is the ability to safely and responsibly navigate the online world. It involves
engaging in online spaces respectfully and thoughtfully, just as we would in person. In today’s
digital age, our actions online—whether learning, communicating, or sharing—carry lasting
consequences that affect our reputation, safety, and digital identity. Each interaction shapes
who we are in the virtual world, highlighting the importance of being mindful and responsible
digital citizens.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
India has historically served as a refuge for people fleeing persecution, conflict, and violence due
to its geographical location and cultural ethos of hospitality. India has not signed any
international agreements on the protection of refugees. But it has historically accommodated
refugee groups on humanitarian grounds and respected customary international law principles.
However, illegal mi
• Significant refugee crises in India include the
o Mass migration during the Partition of 1947, the influx of Tibetan refugees following
China's occupation of Tibet in 1959,
o The arrival of millions of
Refugees & Illegal Migrants
Bangladeshi refugees during the
1971 Liberation War, Refugees: Individuals fleeing persecution due to
o The Sri Lankan Tamil influx during race, religion, nationality, social group, or political
the civil war from the 1980s, opinion, as defined under international law (1951
o Afghan refugees fleeing Soviet UN Convention). Refugees are protected under
and later Taliban rule, and international conventions like non-refoulement,
o The recent Rohingya crisis from which prohibits their return to a country where
Myanmar. they face risk.
These events have deeply influenced Illegal Migrants: People who enter or stay in a
India's demographic landscape and country without legal authorization, often lacking
shaped its domestic and foreign policies. the necessary documentation. Illegal migrants are
treated as trespassers, with no protection under
Current Status and Challenges international law, and may face deportation or
India’s response to refugee crises has legal penalties.
been largely shaped by its non-signatory
status to the 1951 UN Refugee INNER LINE PERMIT
Convention and its 1967 Protocol. This
means that India does not have a legal The Inner Line Permit (ILP) is a document required
framework specifically dedicated to for Indians to enter protected areas. It was
refugees. Instead, refugees are managed introduced under the Bengal Eastern Frontier
under the broader umbrella of the Regulation, 1873, to protect British commercial
Foreigners Act, 1946, which does not interests. After independence, the ILP was
distinguish between refugees and other adapted to safeguard tribal cultures and
foreigners. populations in these regions. Currently, the ILP is
mandatory in four northeastern states—
Challenges: Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, and
• Legal Status: Refugees in India often Manipur. Manipur was added to the ILP system on
face issues related to their legal December 11, 2019. The permit regulates entry
status, with limited access to formal for tourism, work, or long-term stays. It aims to
employment, education, and ensure minimal disruption to the lives of
healthcare. indigenous communities.
• Integration: The integration of
refugees into Indian society remains a challenge, with some communities facing
discrimination and socio-economic hardships.
• Security Concerns: The presence of refugees, particularly in border areas, has led to security
concerns, with debates over their impact on local demographics and resources.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Thus, while the Act aims to improve the immigration system, it can also lead to exclusionary
practices and thus needs careful scrutiny.
To effectively address refugee/illegal migrants challenges, India must further strengthen legal
frameworks, enhance border management, foster regional cooperation, and promote refugee
integration through access to essential services.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction
The Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), and Fundamental Duties
form the core framework of the Indian Constitution, guiding the state's governance and citizens'
responsibilities. While Fundamental Rights guarantee individual freedoms, DPSPs outline the
state's goals for social justice, and Fundamental Duties remind citizens of their moral obligations.
Together, these parts establish a balanced system where rights are protected, duties are
emphasized, and the state's policies aim for a just and equitable society.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1.5.2. Article 13
1.5.2.1 Judicial Doctrines to decide on Laws in Contravention of Fundamental Rights
Doctrines Description
Doctrine of It states that a pre-constitutional law that becomes void due to
Eclipse inconsistency with Fundamental Rights can regain validity if the
Fundamental Right is later amended to align with the law. In such cases,
the law does not need to be re-enacted and becomes valid automatically.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The ruling extended the principles established in Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India (1992),
which had allowed for sub-categorization within the OBC category. The Supreme Court's
decision in Davinder Singh was driven by two ground realities:
● SCs and STs are not uniform classes: Inclusion in Articles 341 and 342 is meant only to
distinguish SCs and STs from other groups, not to establish homogeneity.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1.5.5. Article 19
1.5.5.1. Freedom of Press
Proceedings of the Constituent Assembly debates reveal that the Founding Fathers considered
that freedom of the press was contained in the guarantee of freedom of speech and expression
and need not be specifically mentioned. Thus,
Supreme Court has deduced freedom of the press 44th Amendment, 1976, introduced
from Article 19(1)(a) (Sakaal Papers case 1962) Article 361A, which protects individuals
publishing reports on the proceedings of
In Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, Parliament and State Legislatures.
(1972), the Supreme court described Freedom of
the press as the ‘Ark of the Covenant of Democracy’, and as one of the most precious freedoms
in a democratic state.
Judgements related to Freedom of Press
Cases Judgement
Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi There is no prior censorship of the media, meaning no
(1950) prior permission is needed for publication.
Indian Express Newspapers v. Freedom of the press to include the right to information,
Union of India (1985) the right to publish, and the right to circulate.
1.5.5.2. Issue of Hate Speech
There is no universal definition of hate speech in India. The Law Commission has defined it as
“incitement to hatred primarily against a group of persons defined in terms of race, ethnicity,
gender, sexual orientation, religious belief and the like”.
Certain legal provisions in certain legislation prohibit select forms of speech as exceptions to
freedom of speech, such as:
• Sections 196(1) and 197(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
• The Civil Rights Protection Act of 1955. etc.
• Reasonable restriction under Article 19(2) provides certain restrictions, including defamation
or incitement to an offence.
Important Judgements Related to Hate Speech
Cases Judgement
Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of addressing
v. Union of India (2014) hate speech through legislation, but it refrained from issuing
specific guidelines or directions.
Tehseen Poonawala (2018) It is the “sacrosanct duty” of the state to protect citizens from
case hate crimes.
Indira Jaisingh v. State of The judgement emphasised the importance of context, intent,
Rajasthan (2023) and the likelihood of inciting violence in determining whether a
speech constitutes hate speech.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Freedom of speech and expression can be reasonably restricted on specified grounds. This has
paved the way for banning books and films.
Judgements related to book/film banning
Cases Judgements
Phantom Films Pvt. Ltd. Community standard test should be based on standard
vs. The Central Board of prudence, not sensitivity. This means that the court should not
Film Certification, 2016 prioritize the overly sensitive opinions of a small group over the
fundamental rights of expression of artists.
Perumal Murugan case Established guidelines for the government to protect the artistic
2016 freedom of individuals, including the establishment of an expert
body to address future conflicts between artistic expression and
public sentiments.
1.5.5.4. Contempt of Court
Contempt of court is a concept that encompasses actions or behaviours that threaten the
authority and integrity of the judicial system. Contempt of court cases are often fact-specific, and
the outcomes depend on the specific circumstances of each case.
Basis of Contempt of Court:
• Scandalising the Court: This refers to acts or publications that aim to bring the court or a
judge into disrepute or lower their authority.
• Interfering with the Due Course of Justice: This covers actions that obstruct or impede the
fair and impartial administration of justice. This includes attempting to influence a judge or
court in a pending case.
• Wilful Disobedience of Court Orders: This constitutes "civil contempt" and involves
deliberately refusing to comply with court orders or undertakings.
Cases Judgement
Indirect Tax Practitioners’ Association v. R.K. "Truth" can be a valid defence in contempt
Jain, (2010) proceedings if it is in public interest and the
defence is bona fide.
Pravin C. Shah v. K.A. Mohd Ali and Another, Simply undergoing a sentence for contempt
(2001 of court is not sufficient; genuine remorse
and a sincere apology are required.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Defamation is a legal term that refers to making or sharing spoken or written statements of false
statements that harm a person's
reputation, potentially leading to their Key elements of Criminal Defamation
social, professional, or personal harm.
• Imputation: A statement that is clearly
Supreme court has held that protecting a
identifiable as referring to a particular person
person's reputation is a fundamental
or persons.
right under Article 21, which must be
• Publication: The imputation must be
balanced with free speech.
communicated to at least one third party
Types of defamation suits in India: (beyond the plaintiff and the accused).
In India, defamation can be pursued as • Harm to Reputation: The statement must be
both a criminal offence and a civil intended or reasonably believed to harm the
offence. reputation of the person in question.
• Criminal defamation:- Governed under sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)
(now Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). Punishment involves imprisonment,
fines, or both.
• Civil defamation:- It falls under the domain of tort law, primarily shaped by judicial decisions.
Punishment involves monetary compensation (damages).
Judgements related to Defamation:
Cases Judgements
MJ Akbar Vs Priya Ramani Court analyzed tweets and held them non- defamatory,
Case (2021) emphasizing the need to protect women's rights to speak up.
Aroon Purie v. State of Nct Editors can be held liable for defamatory content but only when
of Delhi (2022) allegations are "sufficient and specific"
1.5.5.6. Internet Ban
• In Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020, Supreme court declared access to the internet
a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution as internet is a medium for the
exercise of freedom of speech and expression.
• Under Article 19(1)(g), it recognized freedom of trade and commerce through internet as a
fundamental right.
• It held that restrictions on internet have to follow the principles of proportionality under
Article 19(2).
• Thus, suspension of internet for indefinite period not permissible. It can only be for a
reasonable duration and periodic review should be done. Further, the government should
publish all orders of prohibition to enable affected persons to challenge the same.
1.5.5.7. Other Issues Related to Article 19
Issues Insights
Freedom of The Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, control what government
Speech and employees can say publicly. They prohibit any statements that:
Civil Servants • Criticize current or recent government policies or actions.
• Could harm relationships between the central government and state or
foreign governments.
Right To Strike In T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu (2003), the Supreme
of Govt. Court ruled that government employees do not have a statutory or
Officials fundamental right to strike.
• The Court stated that grievances must be addressed through the
Administrative Tribunal, with referral to the High Court.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Right to privacy:- Privacy, which embodies the concept of the right to be left alone, is not
expressly mentioned under FRs. In Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd) vs Union Of India 2018,
Court held that privacy assures dignity to the individual and is essential to the exercise of
liberty as it protects an individual's free, personal conception of the 'self’. Thus, Right to
Privacy was held a fundamental right under Article 21.
• Right to die with dignity:- In Common Cause v. Union of India (2018), the court legalized
passive euthanasia and recognized the right to die with dignity as a fundamental right under
Article 21. The court held that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment or life
support and can make an advance directive specifying their wishes in case of terminal illness.
• Decriminalization of Homosexuality:- In Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018,
Supreme Court decriminalised homosexuality emphasising that the right to love and live with
dignity to be within the ambit of ‘right to life’.
• Freedom to Choose Religion and Marry:- In Hadiya Case, 2018, Court held that a person's
right to choose a religion and marry is an intrinsic part of a person’s meaningful existence
and thus it emphasized that neither the State nor “patriarchal supremacy” can interfere in
his/her decision.
• Capital punishment:- In Bachan Singh case (1980), Court held that Death penalty is an
exception not a rule. It proclaimed that death penalty should only be imposed in the "rarest
of rare" cases, highlighting the need for extreme culpability on the part of the offender and
an extreme cause for the crime. In Shabnam v. Union of India (2015), for the first time a
woman was sentenced to death and hanged in India. The death penalty was imposed due to
the pre-planned and brutal nature of the crime.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Personality Rights
The Delhi High Court
has restrained various
entities from using
actor Jackie Shroff's
name, including sobriquets "Jackie" and "Jaggu Dadda", voice and images for commercial
purposes without permission, citing his ‘personality rights’.
"Personality rights" generally refers to two types of tort-based rights: the right to privacy and
the right of publicity. The right of publicity prevents the unauthorized commercial use of an
individual's name, likeness, or other recognizable aspects of one's persona.
1.5.6.2. The Golden Triangle of Fundamental Rights: The Interplay of Article 14, 19, and
21
In the Maneka Gandhi Case, the Supreme Court highlighted a pivotal concept—the "Golden
Triangle" of fundamental rights. This triangle signifies the interconnectedness of three
fundamental rights:
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Case Judgement
Anna Hazare case 2011 Preventive detention law can be invoked only if there is "imminent
danger to peace" and a person sought to be arrested is likely to
commit a cognisable offence. Otherwise, it would violate the
victim's fundamental rights.
Ameena Begum v. Preventive detention laws should be used only in exceptional
State of Telangana circumstances and not as a tool for enforcing law and order.
(2023) Court distinguished between offences that disrupt law and order
and those that affect public order. It held that preventive detention
should only be invoked when an individual's actions are genuinely
prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. This means that
the individual's actions must have a wider impact on the
community, causing fear, panic, or insecurity.
Also, subjective satisfaction of detaining authority must be based
on "rationally probative value" and cannot be based on irrelevant
or extraneous factors.
Pankaj Bansal Case The Supreme Court ruled that merely reading out the grounds of
(2023) arrest is not enough under Article 22(1). It held that the accused
must be given the grounds in writing to ensure transparency and
procedural fairness.
1.5.8. Article 25.
1.5.8.1 Indian Secularism
The Indian concept of Secularism is not similar to the Doctrine of Secularism in America,
(establishes a rigid distinction between the State and the religion.) India adopts an affirmative
side of secularism, wherein it is neutral in terms of religion, and is in consonance with its ancient
legacy of accommodating all faiths and abandoning none.
According to Donald E. Smith, the Indian way of secularism refers to the non-religious functioning
of the State, it has a non-communal and non-sectarian connotation and not a strict schism
between state and religion. India may not be a completely theist state but it is definitely not an
atheist state.
Western secularism Indian secularism
State and religion are mutually exclusive in There is no complete separation of State
their own spheres of operation. from Religion but a ‘principled distance.’
Interpreted liberty as liberty of individual and The idea of inter-religious equality is at the
freedom as freedom of the individual, and core of Indian secularism. Equal focus has
equality as equality between individuals. been given on intra-religious equality.
There is little scope for community-based rights It not only deals with the religious freedom
or minority-based rights. of the individuals but with the minority
communities also.
The state maintains an arm’s length distance It promotes state sponsored reforms in the
from religion in all matters. religious sphere on equal footing.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1.5.10. Article 32
1.5.10.1. Right to Constitutional Remedies
This article grants citizens the right to approach the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement
of their fundamental rights. The Court can issue appropriate orders, directions, or writs to ensure
the protection of these rights.
Further, under Article 32(3), Parliament can authorize any other court also to enforce
fundamental rights without negatively affecting the powers of SC.
Types of Writs
1. Habeas Corpus
• This writ is exercised to ensure the release of a person who has been unlawfully
detained.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Right to Life Article 21: 14th Amendment: In both countries, the right to
and Personal Guarantees the Due process clause life and liberty is protected,
Liberty right to life and protects life, liberty, but India focuses more on
personal liberty. and property. substantive rights (such as
This has been privacy and dignity) while the
expanded to U.S. emphasizes due process
include privacy, in both procedural and
dignity, etc. substantive aspects. The U.S.
focuses heavily on due
process and procedural
fairness.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Protection of Article 31: Right to 5th Amendment: The U.S. guarantees property
Property property (now a Prohibits the taking of rights as a fundamental right,
legal right after the property without due while in India, it is now a legal
44th Amendment, process and just right (no longer a
1978). compensation. fundamental right after the
44th Amendment), but
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Right to Article 32: Allows No direct equivalent: India offers a direct remedy
Constitutional citizens to directly Citizens must go through Article 32 allowing
Remedies approach the through lower courts; citizens to approach the
Supreme Court for the Habeas Corpus Supreme Court for
enforcement of writ allows protection enforcement of Fundamental
Fundamental against unlawful Rights, while U.S. citizens
Rights. detention. must generally go through
lower courts first. However,
the Habeas Corpus writ
provides a similar safeguard
against unlawful detention.
Right to Article 21A: Right No equivalent: There India specifically includes the
Education to free and is no federal right to right to education in the
compulsory education in the U.S. Constitution (a positive right),
education for constitution, though it whereas the U.S. does not
children aged 6-14. is provided at state have a federal constitutional
levels. right to education. The U.S.
approach depends on state-
level provisions for
education.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
K. M. Munshi shared similar concerns, suggesting that making the principles enforceable or
allowing some form of judicial review would make them more effective in promoting social
justice.
In contrast, three main reasons were cited for making them non-enforceable:
Fear of Obsolescence: The Assembly feared that these principles could become outdated over
time with changes in the country.
Challenges of Diversity and Backwardness: Given India’s vast diversity and socio-economic
backwardness, the Assembly believed that the implementation of these principles would be
difficult.
Lack of Resources: At the time of independence and the adoption of the Constitution, India
lacked the necessary resources to make all the DPSPs enforceable. Therefore, they were left to
the government to follow voluntarily.
Taking a pragmatic view, the Constitution makers refrained from giving legal force to these
principles. They believed that public opinion and social awareness would play a more
significant role in fulfilling these principles than legal action or judicial procedures.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Removes legal grey areas:- One of the most prominent downsides of having a pluralistic
model of personal laws is that the entire framework gets riddled with contradictions. UCC
overcomes this issue by bringing uniformity in laws.
o For example, the Muslim, Christian and Parsi laws do not permit adoption while the
Hindu laws permit and regulate the
same. Similarly, when in Satprakash Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code
Meena v. Alka Meena, a family court The Complexity of State-Level UCC:
ruled that the provisions of HMA do Uniformity or Diversity?
not apply on the members of Meena Personal laws related to marriage,
Tribe, Delhi High court raised concern inheritance, divorce, and family matters fall
about potential desertion of Meena under Entry 5 of List-III (Concurrent List) of
women due to recognized bigamy the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution,
practices. allowing states to enact their own laws on
• Promotes constitutional morality:- Many these issues.
aspects of personal laws fall short of
constitutional morality (adherence to While Goa was the only state with a uniform
constitutional norms). UCC can promote civil code (Goa Civil Code based on
constitutional norms of equality, justice, Portuguese laws) before 2024, Uttarakhand
and the rule of law across all citizens. passed its own Uniform Civil Code in 2024.
o For example, Talaq-e-biddat (triple This code includes provisions like a ban on
talaq) is criticized as unjust, requiring practices such as halala, iddat, and talaq,
a derogatory procedure 'nikah and mandatory registration of live-in
halala' for reconciliation. relationships. However, it excludes tribals
• Promotes Gender justice:- Loopholes in from its ambit.
personal laws have been exploited to While the UCC is essential for consistency, if
cause gender injustice. UCC helps remove states adopt different versions, it could
such loopholes. cause confusion, especially for migrants
o For example, in Sarla Mudgal case, dealing with issues like marriage and
conversion to Islam was utilized to property rights.
safeguard against bigamy.
• Promotes secularism: A secular republic needs a common law for all citizens rather than
differentiated rules based on religious practices.
• Promotes national integration: Uniform Civil Code will separate religion from social relations
and personal laws, ensuring equality and thus harmony in the society. In this regard, in
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v Shah Bano Begum (1985), Supreme Court observed that, “A common
civil code will help the cause of national integration by removing disparate loyalties to law
which have conflicting ideologies."
Law Commission on UCC
Challenges
In 2018, Law Commission of India opined that
• Issue of consensus:- The plurality of the Uniform Civil Code is “neither necessary
personal laws makes it a very challenging nor desirable at this stage” and suggested:
task for legislators to arrive at consensus • Preserving diverse personal laws to ensure
on components of one uniform law that non violation of fundamental rights.
could be applied to all citizens, cutting • Ending all forms of gender discrimination.
across different religions.
• Inclusive debate and progressive ideas, on
• Fundamental Right of religious UCC for balancing national unity.
minorities:- Any attempt to enact UCC
are thought to go against the fundamental rights of religious minorities. Conservative
factions perceive such steps as a threat to its political and religious identity and thus oppose
it.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Reduction in Alcohol-Related Deaths: Judicial Burden: Increased case backlog; over 2.14
Fewer fatalities from accidents and lakh cases under the Bihar Prohibition Act by
diseases. February 2020.
Decrease in Crime and Violence: Lessens Risks of Illegal Alcohol Consumption: People
incidents of violence, including domestic addicted to alcohol may resort to consuming hooch
abuse. which can be potentially fatal.
Challenges in Implementing Liquor Recommendations
Prohibition Policy Focus: Laws should encourage responsible
• Corruption: Local officials often alcohol use rather than complete bans.
collude with liquor mafias, Uniform Drinking Age: Implement and enforce a
ignoring illegal activities. standardized legal drinking age.
• Evolving Tactics: Smugglers Tougher Penalties: Strict enforcement against
constantly change their alcohol-induced misconduct, like drunk driving.
methods, making detection De-Addiction Programs: Allocate alcohol revenue for
difficult. public education and de-addiction initiatives.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
3. Fundamental Duties
“The real freedom of any individual can always be measured by the amount of responsibility
which he must assume for his own welfare and security.”—Sir Robert Welch.
An Individual plays a vital role in a State and its welfare and is entitled to exercise rights. Duties
are counterparts of rights. Fundamental duties found their way into the Indian Constitution
through the 42nd Amendment (1976).
Article 51A of the Indian Constitution outlines the Fundamental Duties of citizens. They
include:
• To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions.
• To cherish and follow the noble ideals of the freedom struggle.
• To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India.
• To defend the country and render national service when called upon.
• To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood.
• To value and preserve the rich heritage of the nation's culture.
• To protect and improve the natural environment.
• To develop scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry.
• To safeguard public property and abjure violence.
• To strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity.
• To provide opportunities for education to children between the ages of 6 and 14 years
(added by the 86th Amendment).
Fundamental duties were not explicitly mentioned in the original constitution of India due to
following reasons:
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
In Javed v. State of Haryana, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights have to be read
with fundamental duties and the Directive Principles of State Policy and they cannot be read in
isolation. It held that the enforcement of fundamental rights is, in a way, dependent on the extent
or degree of care taken to follow fundamental duties. Because, if an individual has approached a
court of law to seek enforcement of his fundamental right, then the court may reject to do so if
it finds out that the individual has patently violated his fundamental duty. The case would then
not lean in his favour in such a situation.
• In Minerva Mill case, Supreme court highlighted that though non-justiciable, fundamental
duties are still regarded a rule of law that is expected to be followed. It held that “the
obligation exists prior to and independent of the mechanism of enforcement.”
The judiciary has on multiple occasions tried to ensure effectuation of fundamental duties:
Case Enforcement
Mohan Kumar • The government amended the service rules for All-India
Singhania & Ors. Vs. Services (Administrative, Forest, Police, etc.) as selectees/
Union of India & Ors., officers not were not taking training seriously, leading to
(1992) deterioration of the services.
• The changes were made to emphasize training, penalize
failure, and align with Article 51A (j) to ensure the
effectiveness of the country's higher civil services.
Vellore Citizens’ • Supreme Court recognized ‘The Precautionary Principle’ and
Welfare Forum Vs. the ‘The Polluter pays’ principle as essential features of
Union of India, (1996) ‘Sustainable Development’ and part of the environment law of
the country.
• Article 21, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duty clause
(g) of article 51A were relied on by the Supreme Court for
spelling out a clear mandate to the State to protect and
improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and
wild life of the country.
M.C. Mehta V. Union of • The Supreme Court held that under Article 51-A(g), it is the
India (1998) and M.C. duty of the central government to introduce compulsory
Mehta II (2000) teaching of lessons on protection and improvement of natural
environment in all the educational institution of the country.
• Similarly, in M.C. Mehta II (2000), the Court held that the duty
must be read in conjunction with Article 48A of the
Constitution, which imposes an obligation on the State to
protect the natural environment, and Article 21, which bars
disturbances to air, water, and soil necessary to sustain life.
S.N. Chouksey vs UoI, • The supreme court in its concluding statement said that “the
(National Anthem Citizens or persons are bound to show respect as required
Case), 2018 under executive orders relating to the National Anthem of
India and the prevailing law, whenever it is played or sung on
specified occasions”.
Apart from enumerated 11 fundamental duties in the constitution, Supreme court has taken
into account few additional duties in its judgements. Few examples are as follows:
Additional Duties Judgement
Duty to keep premises clean • Article 21 has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to
include the right to a clean environment. (Vellore
Citizens’ Welfare Forum case 1996)
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 76
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction
The separation of powers is
an organizational structure
in which responsibilities,
authorities, and powers are
divided between groups
(branches of government)
rather than being centrally held. The doctrine is rooted in a political philosophy that too much
power concentrated in the hands of few, without adequate checks and balances, increases the
likelihood of misuse of that power.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
In the ‘Re Delhi Laws Act case (1951)’, the Supreme Court observed that except where the
Constitution has vested power in a body, the principle that one organ should not perform
functions which essentially belong to others is followed in India. Later, in Kesavananda Bharati
case, the doctrine of “separation of powers” was acknowledged as an integral part of the basic
features of our Constitution.
Let’s look at the separation of power in India through study of functional overlaps and checks
and balances on various organs of state.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
There is a robust system of checks and balances to ensure the healthy exercise of separation of
power.
1. Judiciary control of legislature:
‘Control’ by the judiciary of the other organs follows from the existence of a written
constitution and its power of judicial review. The judiciary has provided sufficient checks on
legislative actions through its various judgements.
• In Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu, the Supreme Court held that the finality of decision of
the presiding officer regarding disqualification due to defection doesn’t abrogate the
judicial review of the decision under A 136, 226, 227 of the constitution.
• Judicially developed constitutional concepts such as Basic structure doctrine (in
Kesavananda Bharti case), constitutional morality (in Navtej Singh Johar case), and ‘due
process of law’ have circumscribed legislative powers. In P Kannadasan V State of Tamil
Nadu, it was held, “the Constitution has invested the Constitutional Courts with the
power to invalidate laws made by Parliament and the state legislatures transgressing
Constitutional limitations.”
• In Lily Thomas 2013, Supreme Court held that disqualification of members of legislature
(under Articles 102 and 191) would take effect immediately upon their conviction.
2. Judiciary control of executive:
• The Supreme court has often issued directions for executive and at times set up
committees to monitor and oversee the implementation of its directions to executive.
For example, in Ram Jethmalani Vs UoI 2011, court formed a committee to investigate
the impact of Pegasus on citizens’ right to privacy.
• Courts have often placed a check on arbitrary executive actions. For example, in
Rameshwar Prasad case (2006), the Supreme Court held that proclamation of President
rule was subject to judicial review and relevant material must exist to justify the issue of
Proclamation.
• The collegium system for judicial appointments maintains judicial independence by
limiting executive influence on selection of judges.
3. Legislature control on executive:
Legislative organ exercises control and check over executive through following instruments:
• Question hours, debates, motions and parliamentary committees to exercise control
over policies and budgets.
• Parliament is responsible for scrutinizing the finances of the Executive by: (i) approving
the levy of taxes and expenditure of the government, and (ii) examining if the approved
expenditure has been spent properly.
• The executive is accountable to Parliament and can be dismissed by a vote of no
confidence.
4. Legislature control on judiciary:
• 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1976 introduced Article 323A and 323B which
authorize parliament and state legislatures to create tribunals for adjudication of
disputes on various subjects while excluding the jurisdiction of courts and power of
judicial review.
• The power of impeachment of judges lies with the Parliament.
5. Executive control on Judiciary:
• The President of India decides on who is to be appointed as a judge of Supreme Court
or High Court.
• Executive also controls the appointment and service conditions of the District judiciary.
• Executive has the power to prosecute judges for offences under the Prevention of
Corruption Act (K Veeraswami case 1991).
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 84
2. Union Executive........................................................................................................................ 84
2.2.1. Election....................................................................................................................... 91
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction
The Political Executive consists of elected or appointed representatives who derive their
authority from the people's mandate. At the national level, this includes the President, Prime
Minister, and Cabinet Ministers. At the state level, it comprises the Governor, Chief Minister,
and other ministers. These executives are responsible for formulating policies, making high-level
decisions, and shaping governance.
In this chapter, we shall discuss only selected UPSC Mains relevant topics pertaining to this unit.
2. Union Executive
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The President of India is the Head of State, nominal head of the Union Executive, the first citizen
of India, the Supreme Commander of Indian Armed Forces.
The United States follows a federal republic France operates under a semi-presidential
system, where the President is elected representative democratic republic system,
through an indirect process involving the where the President is elected by popular
Electoral College. Voters technically elect vote for a five-year term.
electors who then vote for the President. The The election involves two rounds of voting,
two-party system (Democrats and with a majority required to win in the first
Republicans) dominates the election, round. If no candidate achieves a majority,
although other parties can also participate. the top two candidates compete in the
The election process is designed to balance second round. The French system aims to
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Advisory Opinion (Article 143): The Court stated that if a Governor reserves a bill for the
President on the grounds of it potentially being unconstitutional, the President "ought to"
seek the Supreme Court's opinion under Article 143. While not strictly mandatory, the
Court indicated this course holds high persuasive value for ensuring constitutionality.
• Limitation on Reservation: It is important to note (as relevant to the Governor's powers
discussed later in the Unit of State Executive) that a bill re-passed by the State Legislature
cannot be reserved for the President's consideration by the Governor; assent is mandatory
in such cases.
2.1.2.1.2. Differences between Veto Power of President of India and President of USA
USA INDIA
o The President gets 10 days o No such time limit prescribed by Indian
(excluding Sundays) to sign a bill constitution. Indian President has Pocket Veto.
passed by Congress. Hence, no
Pocket Veto.
o When the President returns the o Qualified Veto is not available to the President
legislation to the House, such a veto of India. If the President, instead of refusing
can be overridden only by a 2/3rd assent, returns the bill for reconsideration with
vote in both the Senate and the a message for both Houses, a re-passage of the
House. bill by “Ordinary” majority would compel the
President to give his assent (Suspensive Veto).
It is not available for the Money Bills.
o The President of the USA doesn’t o The President of India enjoys veto power over
enjoy veto over state legislation. state legislations, provided the Governor had
reserved the bill for reconsideration of the
President (Article 201). Post such reservation,
the Governor loses further role in the
enactment of the bill.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
the President to require the Council of Ministers to the Council of Ministers headed
reconsider such advice once. Following its by the Prime Minister.”
reconsideration, the President is bound to act in (42nd CAA: Replaced ‘may’ by
accordance with such advice. ‘shall.’)
• So, the President doesn’t have any constitutional
discretion but only situational discretion.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2.2. Vice-President
The office of Vice-President was established to address potential governance disruptions
arising from the President's unavailability to perform official duties (colonial experience during
Viceroy Successions).
The office of Vice-President is, in some respects, a unique feature of Union Executive. There is
no such office in other parliamentary executives; for example, there is no such office either in
England, or in Ireland. Even in the States of the Indian Union, there is no post equivalent to a
Deputy Governor.
2.2.1. Election
Article 66 of Constitution provides for the election process of the Vice President of India.
2.2.1.1. Comparison of Elections of the President and the Vice-President of India
President Vice-President
• Electoral college: • Electoral college:
o Elected members of Lok Sabha and o All MPs of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha
Rajya Sabha. (Elected + Nominated)
o Elected members of State/UT o MLAs don’t participate in the
legislative Assemblies. election of the Vice-President.
• The value of each vote is different in • The value of each vote is the same in Vice-
Presidential election. Presidential election.
• For nomination, at least 50 electors as • A candidate needs at least 20 electors as
‘Proposers’ and 50 electors as proposers and at least 20 electors as
‘Seconders’ are required. seconders for nomination.
• Voting takes place at multiple locations • Voting takes place in the Parliament.
as elected MLAs also form part of the
electoral college.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
According to Article 65(1), the Vice-President acts as the President when the office of the
President is vacant. S/he continues to act as the President until the President resumes the office
or a new President enters upon the office. The chief role of Vice-President is as ex-officio
Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2.3.2. Cabinet
The Cabinet is the top decision-making body of the government, consisting of the Prime Minister
and other senior ministers (Cabinet ministers only). It derives its existence from Article 75.
USA India
Similarities
• The original constitution of America • The original text of the Constitution of
doesn’t explicitly establish a cabinet. It is India doesn’t mention the Cabinet.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2.3.4. PMO
The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) was originally called the Prime Minister’s Secretariat until
1977, when it was renamed during the Morarji Desai administration. The PMO provides
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
As per Article 155, the Governor is appointed by the President of India. In recent years, the
political role of Governors has sparked numerous controversies, frequently highlighting concerns
regarding their appointments.
3.1.1. Issues related to Appointment
The Constituent Assembly members, such as Ambedkar, Nehru, KM Munshi, etc., argued that
persons so appointed would be:
• Above-party politics.
• Detached outsiders.
• Eminent in their achievements, and
• With no reason to meddle in the everyday affairs of the States, they formally headed.
While the Constituent Assembly expected that conventions would evolve to ensure fair and
transparent appointments, protecting the autonomy of states, the process has not always
adhered to these ideals.
Several controversies have arisen over the years due to deviations from the expected
conventions:
• Partisan Appointments: Governors
who are loyal to the ruling party at
the Centre have often been
appointed, raising questions about
their neutrality.
• Appointment of Politicians in Neighbouring States: Politicians active in one state have
sometimes been made Governors of neighbouring states, leading to concerns about political
bias and interference.
• Connection to Active Politics: Many appointees have maintained their ties with active
politics and, in some cases, have even returned to electoral politics after serving as
Governors, affecting the impartiality of the office.
To overcome these issues, the following suggestions have been put forth:
• Neutrality in Appointments: The Sarkaria Commission (1983-1988) rejected the demand for
selection of governor from a panel of names given by the state governments. However, it
suggested that:
o Active politicians should not be appointed governors.
o The Governor of a state should be outside of the state.
o The Chief Minister should be consulted before appointing the Governor for proper
working of the parliamentary system.
Punchi commission on Governor’s
• Institutional Mechanisms: The Second
appointment
Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC)
• The governor be appointed through the
(2006) recommended establishing an
interstate council's platform.
independent body to shortlist candidates
• A list of eminent persons can be compiled
based on objective criteria, such as prior
through consultation and that when
administrative or academic experience,
vacancies occur, individuals from the list
integrity, and detachment from political
may be appointed.
affiliations.
• Rather than leaving qualifications such as
• Committee system of appointment: A
eminent person and no active political
collegium system, consisting of the Prime
background to conventions, it is
Minister, Home Minister, Lok Sabha
preferable to include them explicitly in
Speaker, and the concerned Chief
the constitution.
Minister, should appoint the Governors ,
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Governors have often misused their discretionary powers, compromising the federal balance.
Landmark judgments, such as S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), have sought to limit this
misuse by subjecting the Governor’s decisions, especially under Article 356, to judicial review.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Constitutional authorities occupying high offices must be guided by the values of the
Constitution. Supreme
court in TN Governor
case noted that “In
times of conflict,
Governor must be the
harbinger of consensus
and resolution, lubricating the functioning of the State machinery by his sagacity and wisdom,
and not bring it to a standstill.”
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Introduction
The Legislature is one of the three fundamental branches of government in a democracy,
entrusted with the critical task of creating, amending, and repealing laws that govern society. In
a federal system such as India, legislature operates at two levels:
• Union Legislature (Parliament): Bicameral, comprising the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha,
responsible for laws on the Union List (e.g., defense, foreign affairs).
• State Legislatures: Mostly unicameral (Vidhan Sabha), enacting laws on the State List (e.g.,
police, agriculture).
2. Indian Parliament
The Parliament is the supreme legislative body of India.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Rajya Sabha holds equal power with the Lok Sabha The Rajya Sabha holds unequal
in certain areas. These include: power with the Lok Sabha in
• Introduction and Passage of Bills: Participates in the certain areas. These include:
introduction and passage of ordinary bills, • In financial matters, the Rajya
constitutional amendment bills, and financial bills Sabha is subordinate to the
that involve expenditure from the Consolidated Fund Lok Sabha. Money Bills can
of India. only be introduced in the Lok
• Election and Impeachment of Key Authorities: Sabha, and the Rajya Sabha
o Shares responsibility in the election and cannot amend or reject them.
impeachment of the President. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
o Participates in the election and removal of the has the authority to
Vice-President (though the removal of the Vice- determine if a bill qualifies as
President can be initiated only by the Rajya a Money Bill.
Sabha). • The Rajya Sabha can only
• Removal of High Officials: Recommends the removal discuss the budget and cannot
of the Chief Justice, judges of the Supreme Court vote on demands for grants.
and High Courts, Chief Election Commissioner, and • only the Lok Sabha can pass a
the Comptroller and Auditor General. no-confidence motion to
• Approval of Ordinances and Proclamations: remove the Council of
Approves ordinances issued by the President and Ministers.
proclamations of emergency under Article 352, 356, • In a joint sitting, the Lok
and 360. Sabha’s greater strength
• Consideration of Reports: Considers reports from usually prevails, unless
constitutional bodies, such as the Finance opposition parties collectively
Commission and Union Public Service Commission outnumber the ruling
(UPSC). coalition in both Houses.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Thus, even though the Rajya Sabha has been given less powers as compared with the Lok Sabha,
its utility is supported on the following grounds:
• It checks hasty, defective, careless, and ill-considered legislation made by the Lok Sabha by
making provision for revision and thought.
• It facilitates giving representation to eminent professionals and experts who cannot face
the direct election. The President nominates 12 such persons to the Rajya Sabha.
• It maintains the federal equilibrium by protecting the interests of the states against the
undue interference of the Centre.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
To uphold the credibility and neutrality of the Speaker's office, several reforms are necessary to
strengthen its independence and ensure it functions as a pillar of democracy.
• Consensus-Based Appointment:
Adopting an inclusive appointment process involving consultation with the Leader of the
Opposition can enhance trust among political parties. This would place a moral obligation
on the Speaker to act fairly and uphold the dignity of the office.
• Transfer of Anti-Defection Powers:
Shifting the Speaker’s powers under the Anti-Defection Law to the Election Commission of
India, as recommended by the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission, would ensure
neutrality in disqualifying legislators.
• "Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker" Convention:
Following the UK model, where the Speaker is re-elected unopposed in subsequent terms,
would insulate the office from political competition. The V.S. Page Committee (1967)
advocated a similar approach for India.
Lessons could be drawn from Vithalbhai Patel, India’s first Speaker, who demonstrated the
importance of resigning party affiliations to reinforce political neutrality. Implementing such
reforms will strengthen the Speaker’s independence, ensuring their role as an unbiased guardian
of parliamentary traditions, enhancing public trust, and safeguarding democratic values.
2.5.1.4. Differences between offices of Presiding officers in India and UK
Parameter India UK
Title Speaker of the Lok Sabha / Speaker of the House of Commons / Lord
Chairman of the Rajya Sabha Speaker of the House of Lords.
Election Speaker elected from within Speaker elected from within the House,
Process the majority party or coalition. usually resign from their political party.
Doesn’t resign from party British system places a strong emphasis
membership. on the impartiality of its presiding
officers.
Position within The Speaker of the Lok Sabha is The Speaker is independent of the party
the a member of the ruling party, and does not represent any political
Government holding office on a party ticket; faction; Lord Speaker is non-partisan.
Rajya Sabha Chairman is the However, at times political backgrounds
Vice-President of India, linked lead to criticisms of bias (Brexit case)
to the executive.
Casting Vote Speaker of the Lok Sabha has a The Speaker's casting vote is used to
casting vote, which can be maintain the status quo or allow further
decisive in case of ties on debate, not for personal preference.
legislation.
Re-election Speaker contests re-election Speaker stands for re-election as
on a party ticket. 'Speaker' rather than as a party
candidate.
Powers on The Speaker has final say on The Speaker of the House of Commons
Money Bills the passage of money bills in has no such explicit power.
the Lok Sabha.
2.5.2. Institution of ‘Whip’ & related issues
Each political party, whether in the ruling or opposition, appoints a Chief Whip along with other
whips in Parliament for several key responsibilities.
• The whip assists the party leader and is primarily responsible for ensuring that party
members attend sessions in large numbers.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Limited Debate and Referral to Committees: The effectiveness of Parliament is often hampered
by:
• Lack of meaningful debates,
• The limited referral of bills to
parliamentary committees, and
• Frequent disruptions during
sessions.
These issues weaken Parliament’s role
as a deliberative and legislative body,
reducing its ability to perform key
functions like scrutinizing laws,
debating policies, and holding the
government accountable.
1. Lack of meaningful debates: Many
bills are passed in Parliament with
little or no debate, undermining its
role as a forum for informed
decision-making. For example,
• In 17th LS, the majority of Bills
were passed without recorded Private member bills
voting. 9% of Bills were passed with at • Out of 729 Private Members’ Bills (PMBs)
least one instance of recorded voting. were introduced in the 17th Lok Sabha,
35% of Bills were passed with less only 2 were discussed and none passed.
than an hour of discussion in Lok • Only 14 such bills have been passed since
Sabha. The corresponding figure for 1952, with the last in 1970.
Rajya Sabha was 34%.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Experts argue the rule is outdated, especially after the Tenth Schedule, which recognizes even
one-member parties. For instance, in the Delhi Assembly in 2015, the BJP was recognized as the
opposition despite not meeting the threshold.
Countries like the UK designate the largest non-government party as the opposition, without
requiring a fixed seat percentage. Revising India’s 10% rule could align with modern political
realities, ensuring a more inclusive and functional opposition.
2.6.4. Parliamentary Committees and related issues
Parliamentary Committees are specialized groups within Parliament tasked with assisting in its
legislative, administrative, and oversight functions. While the Constitution of India does not
explicitly define Parliamentary Committees, they are referred to indirectly through provisions like
Article 118, which empowers each House to regulate its procedures, and Article 105, which
grants MPs privileges necessary for their duties.
The framework for these committees
is primarily derived from the Rules of
Procedure and Conduct of Business
of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
2.6.4.1. Role
• Parliamentary Committees function in a private and non-partisan manner to encourage free
discussion. Committees have the authority to call for witnesses, papers, and records.
Subcommittees may also be formed to focus on specific aspects of their work.
• Reports of committees are presented to the House, containing recommendations based on
their deliberations. These reports, while not binding, significantly influence parliamentary
decisions, reinforcing the committees' role in promoting detailed scrutiny and enhancing
democratic governance.
2.6.4.2. Types
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Thus, 2nd ARC suggested that Legislative Council, where exists, must work as representatives of
the Panchayati Raj Institutions for strengthening the local governance.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Gram Nyayalayas
Lok Adalats
Lok Adalat, also known as the People's Court, serves as an Alternative Dispute Redressal
Mechanism. It gained statutory status under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, which was
later amended in 2002 to establish permanent Lok Adalats for public utility services, guided by
the principles of natural justice.
Cases that can be referred to Lok Adalat include:
• Any case pending before any court.
• Any dispute not yet brought before any court but is likely to be filed.
• The nature of cases undertaken includes matrimonial disputes, property disputes, motor
accident claims, land acquisition, and other similar matters.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Legal framework
1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as per UNCITRAL Model Law, applicable to all kinds of
arbitrations including commercial disputes. Amendment Act, 2021 allows for an unconditional
stay of enforcement of arbitral awards in cases where arbitration agreement, contracts, or
award itself were obtained through fraud or corruption.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Timeline for Must be completed within 120 days, which may be extended by another
conducting 60 days with consent of parties.
Mediation • A party may withdraw from mediation after two sessions.
• Court-annexed mediation must be conducted as per the rules framed
by Supreme Court or High Courts.
Enforceability Agreements resulting from mediation will be binding and enforceable in
the same manner as court judgments.
• Verdict can be challenged before a competent court within 90 days.
• Mediated settlement can be challenged on grounds of fraud,
corruption, impersonation, and disputes not fit for mediation only.
Establishment Consists of 1 chairperson, 2 full-time members (with experience in
of Mediation mediation or ADR), 1 part-time member (including Law Secretary, and
Council of India Expenditure Secretary) and 3 ex officio members.
(MCI)
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
To address the issue of pendency and delays, following reforms can be made:
Women in Judiciary
The Supreme Court of India’s “State of the Judiciary” report (2023) showed 36.3% of women
in the district judiciary.
As of January 2024, only 13.4% of
judges in the High Court and 9.3%
judges in the Supreme Court are
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Judicial activism refers to the judiciary taking a proactive role in interpreting laws and ensuring
justice, often stepping in when other branches of the government fail to act. Judicial activism in
India is rooted in Articles 13, 32, and 226 of the Constitution, empowering courts to strike down
legislative, executive, or administrative actions that violate constitutional principles.
Judicial Overreach refers to instances Power to do ‘Complete Justice’ (Article 142)
when the judiciary exceeds its
Supreme Court is empowered to exercise its
constitutional authority and intervenes
authority to ensure "complete justice" in any case
in the functions of the legislature or the
before it. However, there are no specific rules or
executive. Judicial overreach occurs
guidelines outlining when or how the Court can
when courts assume roles beyond their
invoke this extraordinary power, leaving its
mandate, such as formulating policies or
application to the discretion of the Court.
directing administrative actions, which
are the exclusive domains of the Court has used the provision in significant
legislature and executive. situations such as Bhopal Gas tragedy (1989)
judgment, Coal Block Allocation Case (2014),
3.4.1. Public Interest Litigation Tamil Nadu Governor case (2025).
(PIL)
PIL emerged as a significant
tool for judicial activism,
enabling the judiciary to
intervene where the
legislature or executive failed
to act.
The growth of PIL in India is driven by
• The relaxation of locus
standi, allowing wider access
to justice, especially for
marginalized groups.
• Judicial activism and media
attention have further promoted PILs as a tool for social justice, addressing environmental
and human rights concerns.
• Additionally, PILs emerged due to executive and legislative inaction.
However, rampant filing of PILs has raised various concerns.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
A Special Leave Petition (SLP) is a request made to the Supreme Court of India to review a
judgment or order from any lower court or tribunal. While SLPs provide an important avenue for
seeking justice, few key issues hamper their efficiency and effectiveness in justice delivery.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Writ Petitions: Both Indian and British legal systems utilize writs as legal tools to provide
remedies to aggrieved individuals.
• Rule of Law: It remains the fundamental principle governing both India and the UK. It ensures
equality before the law and protection of basic human rights.
• Interpretation of Constitution: Supreme Courts in both countries hold supreme authority for
interpreting their respective constitutions.
• Independence of Judiciary: Judges can only be removed for serious misbehaviour with
approval from both Houses of Parliament in India and Britain.
4.1.2. Differences
Feature Indian Judiciary British Judiciary
Nature of Judicial India has a single integrated Separate legal systems for
System judicial system covering the England and Wales, Scotland,
entire country. and Northern Ireland.
Appointment of Collegium system recommends The independent Judicial
judges to Higher persons for appointment to the Appointments Commission
judiciary President. (JAC) oversees the process of
judges’ appointments. The JAC
consists of 15 members; three of
these are judges, while 12
members are selected through a
process of open competition.
Judicial Review Judicial review is a fundamental Judiciary does not possess
feature; Supreme Court can inherent authority to invalidate
strike down duly enacted Acts of Parliament due to
legislations based on parliamentary sovereignty.
constitutionality.
Codified nature of India has a codified No single codified constitution;
constitution constitution. Also, codified laws laws are derived from statutes,
like IPC and CrPC codify judicial common law, and European
procedures and criminal law. Union law (pre-Brexit).
Judicial limitations on India follows the basic structure No basic structure doctrine;
legislature doctrine, which protects Parliament is supreme and can
essential features of the amend the constitution without
Constitution from amendments. limitations.
Appointment of Judges are appointed by the Judicial appointments are
Judges President on the advice of the regulated by the Judicial
collegium system. Appointments Commission
established by the
Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
4.2.2. Differences
Feature Indian Judiciary American Judiciary
Nature of judiciary Integrated nature of judiciary. Separate hierarchies of
federal and State Courts.
Appointment process Collegium system recommends The candidates are assessed by
of judges to higher persons for appointment to the a committee of the American
judiciary President. Bar Association and reviewed
by the Senate Judiciary
Committee before a vote and
consent of the Senate.
Retirement age of Fixed by the constitution. Judges are appointed by the
judges in Higher President. There is no set
judiciary retirement age for judges in the
US as they continue to hold
office for "good behavior".
Jurisdiction Original jurisdiction limited to Broader original jurisdiction.
federal matters; appellate Primary focus on
jurisdiction covers constitutional, constitutional cases in
civil, and criminal cases. appellate jurisdiction.
Special Powers Supreme Court can grant Special No plenary powers to grant
Leave to Appeal. such an appeal.
Advisory Jurisdiction Provision for Advisory Jurisdiction No provision for Advisory
present. Jurisdiction.
Limitations on state India’s constitution puts limitation Constitution of USA mentions
authority against by “Procedure Established by “Due Process of Law” as
citizen’s rights Law”. It doesn’t mention ‘Due limitation on state’s authority.
process of law”, though it has been
used by the judiciary.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Election
An election is a formal process by which a
population in a region elects individuals to hold
public office or make decisions on behalf of the
community.
In this chapter, we shall cover key issues related
to elections, relevant for UPSC CSE Mains Exam
with a brief overview of relevant key concepts.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Constitution empowers Parliament to legislate on matters related to elections for the
Parliament and State Legislatures. In exercise of this power, Parliament enacted the
Representation of the People Act, 1950 and Representation of the People Act, 1951.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Proponents like Syed Karimuddin and K.T. Shah argued that PR would prevent majoritarianism
by allocating seats based on vote share, ensuring "true representation of all sections" in India’s
diverse society. They emphasized that PR would empower geographically dispersed minorities,
giving them a legislative voice and
democratizing political participation.
While acknowledging PR’s fairness, Dr.
B.R. Ambedkar and M.
Ananthasayanam Ayyangar defended
FPTP on practical grounds. They
argued that India’s largely illiterate
electorate needed a simple, stable,
and intelligible system. FPTP’s
clarity—where the candidate with the
most votes wins—promoted direct
accountability and reduced voter
confusion.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
It outlines the disqualification process for corrupt practices. Under the Representation of the
People Act (RPA), 1951, corrupt practices include:
1. Bribery – Offering or accepting money or gifts to influence voting.
2. Undue Influence – Any attempt to interfere with a person’s right to vote freely, such as using
threats or social pressure.
3. False Information – Spreading lies
to harm a candidate’s chances or
mislead voters.
4. Promotion of Hatred –
Encouraging hostility between
different groups based on religion,
caste, or language for electoral
gain.
Election-related corruption cases are
forwarded to the President within 3
months of being filed. The Election Commission investigates and provides its opinion to the
President, who must act based on that opinion. If disqualified, the person may remain ineligible
for up to 6 years.
Disqualification on Other Grounds:
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
A political party is recognized as a national party if it fulfills any of the following conditions:
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• A petition (by Ashwin Upadhyaya & others 2025) seeks a life time ban on convicted
persons from contesting elections. The petitioners argue that if a convicted person is not
eligible for even a junior-grade government job, how could they become law makers six
years after serving their sentence.
• There was an apparent conflict of interest if people found guilty of breaking the law
returned as lawmakers.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
By adopting these reforms and fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and ethical
leadership, it is possible to curb the criminalization of politics and ensure a healthier and more
democratic political system in India.
4.1.1. Cases related to Criminalization of Politics
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• In 1998 Lok Sabha and State Assembly polls, Election commission introduced guideline under
Article 324: While carrying the results of exit and opinion polls, newspapers and channels
shall disclose- Sample size of the electorate, Details of polling methodology, Margin of error
and Background of the polling agency.
• In 1999, guidelines were challenged by media and a Constitutional Bench said that ECI cannot
enforce guidelines in the absence of statutory sanction. Therefore, ECI took them down.
• In 2004 ECI gave recommendation to amend the Representation of the People Act 1951 to
ban both exit and opinion polls during a period as specified.
• In 2010, restrictions were imposed only on exit polls through the introduction of Section
126(A) in RPA, 1951.
• In 2017, Election Commission (EC) said that Predictions by astrologers, Tarot readers and
Political analysts on election results cannot be published or broadcast by the media. EC
observed such kind of analysis is equivalent Exit polls.
Way Forward
• An independent regulator that could set up standards of professional integrity for all poll
research and accredit the agencies better scrutiny.
• The regulator can also be empowered to setup standards on parameters of survey like sample
size, sampling methodology, timeframe, quality of training of research staff etc.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Various committees and commissions have analysed the state funding of elections and have
come out with following recommendations:
Committee/Commission Recommendations
Indrajit Gupta Committee Endorsed state funding for elections and recommended it
(1988) for national and state parties only.
Short-term state funding should only be given in kind to
national and state parties.
Law Commission of India Desirable total state funding with prohibition on other
(1999) funding sources.
It also stressed on regulatory framework (for example,
intra-party democracy, maintenance of accounts, etc.).
Second Administrative Recommended partial state funding to reduce illegitimate
Reforms Commission (2nd election expenses.
ARC, 2008)
National Commission to Appropriate framework for regulation of political parties
Review the Working of the would need to be implemented before state funding is
Constitution (2001) considered.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
YES NO
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Compulsory Voting
As of 2025, 22 countries have laws mandating voting. Few examples are:
• Australia: Mandatory voting since 1924, with fines imposed for non-voters.
• Belgium: Penalties include fines and restrictions on public sector employment.
• Brazil: Voting has been compulsory since 1932, with exemptions for illiterates and those
over 70.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
1. Issues with Appointment and Removal • Reforming the Appointment Process: The
Process Dinesh Goswami Committee (1990)
• Executive Dominance in Appointments: recommended a broad-based selection
The Constitution does not provide the committee for appointing the Chief
qualifications for appointment of an Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election
election commissioner or CEC. The Chief Commissioners (ECs). It proposed including
Election Commissioner and Other the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition,
Election Commissioners (Appointment, and Chief Justice of India in the selection
Conditions of Service and Term of Office) panel to reduce executive dominance.
Act, 2023, establishes a selection • Ensuring Uniform Removal Procedures:
committee consisting of the Prime Align the removal process of Election
Minister, a Union Minister, and the Commissioners with that of the Chief
Leader of Opposition. Election Commissioner. This would require
This setup has been criticized for omitting the constitutional amendments to protect ECs
CJI from the selection committee, as directed from arbitrary removal and ensure equal
by the 2022 constitutional bench order. The safeguards for all members.
2:1 majority vested in the executive renders Insights from Constituent Assembly
any selection vulnerable to the criticism that debates
those chosen in that manner would not be
seen as independent. Prof. Shibban Lal Saksena wanted the
appointment of the Chief Election
In 2025, a controversy arose when the Commissioner as well as the Election
selection committee ignored a request Commissioners to be confirmed by a two-
from Leader of the Opposition, Rahul thirds majority in a joint session of both
Gandhi. The committee proceeded to Houses of Parliament. He also wanted both
appoint Gyanesh Kumar as the Chief the Chief Election Commissioner and the
Election Commissioner (CEC) and inducted Election Commissioners to be removed by
Vivek Joshi as the third member. the same process, viz., in like manner and on
the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme
• Removal Process: While the Chief Court, and non-variation of the service
Election Commissioner can only be conditions of the Election Commissioners to
removed in a manner similar to that for their disadvantage, as was provided for in
a Supreme Court judge, the other the service conditions of the Chief Election
Election Commissioners can be removed Commissioner.
on the recommendation of the Chief
Election Commissioner (CEC). This The reason this was rejected was more
provision exposes them to political because the framers had an alternative
pressures, as their tenure is subject to conception of the Election Commission.
the will of the CEC, rather than a more They believed that the institution should
independent body. have one permanent head and that others
could be appointed as and when conditions
so merited.
Of late, these are the precise changes that
are now being demanded to ensure the
independence of the Election Commission
of India (ECI).
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Federalism
Federalism is a system where power is constitutionally divided between a central government
and regional entities, allowing each to govern independently within their areas while working
together on shared issues.
Federalism in India
India is often considered quasi-federal, combining both federal and unitary elements. While the
country operates with a federal system, the Constitution does not explicitly use the term
"federal." Instead, Article 1 refers to India as a "Union of States."
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2. Federal Structure
Being federal in nature, our Constitution divides
legislative, executive and financial powers
between the Centre and States. However judicial
powers are exercised by an integrated judicial
system, which enforces both the central and state
laws.
1. Territorial Jurisdiction
Parliament can make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India as well as extra
territorial legislative powers. Whereas a state can legislate only for their state.
However, there are certain limitations to territorial jurisdiction of Parliament in certain
situations. For example- Scheduled Areas.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Taxes Levied by the Union Taxes Levied by the States Concurrent List and Taxation
(Union List) (State List)
The Concurrent List does not
The Parliament has The State Legislatures have contain any taxation powers,
exclusive authority to exclusive authority to meaning both the Centre and
impose taxes on subjects impose taxes on subjects States do not have
listed under the Union List. listed under the State List. simultaneous authority to
impose the same tax.
Examples include income Examples include land
tax (except agricultural revenue, agricultural income However, an exception was
income), corporation tax, tax, stamp duty (except in introduced through the 101st
customs duties, excise certain cases), state excise Constitutional Amendment
duties (except on alcohol), on alcohol, motor vehicle Act, 2016, which granted
service tax (now subsumed tax, and tax on professions concurrent taxing powers for
under GST), and wealth tax. and employment. Goods and Services Tax (GST)
to both the Parliament and
State Legislatures.
Residuary Powers of Taxation
• The Constitution grants Parliament exclusive authority over residuary taxation (i.e.,
taxes not mentioned in any of the three lists).
• Using this power, the Centre has introduced taxes like gift tax, expenditure tax, and
wealth tax.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Apart from tax revenue sharing, the Constitution of India provides for grants-in-aid from the
Central Government to State Governments to support their financial needs.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The present position with respect to the distribution of tax revenues between the centre and the
states is as follows:
During emergencies, financial relations between the Centre and States can change, allowing the
President to modify the constitutional distribution of revenues.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Phase Description
The First Phase Marked by smooth federalism due to single-party rule in most
(Independence to Mid- states and the Centre.
1960s)
Confrontational federalism Regional parties like DMK and RJD began asserting their
(1967- late 1980s) interests, leading national parties to give more importance to
regional roles in governance.
Cooperative Federalism The era marked a shift towards collaboration between the
(1991- 2014) Centre and states, with more emphasis on working together for
national development.
Competitive & Cooperative The current phase combines elements of competition and
Federalism (2014-present) cooperation, where states are encouraged to compete in areas
like development while also cooperating with the Centre
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
Non-permanent body The Punchhi Commission recommended that the ISC should be
made a permanent body under the Constitution.
Lack of technical The Punchhi Commission also recommended that the ISC should
expertise have expert advisory bodies or administrative tribunals with
quasi-judicial authority to give recommendations to the ISC as
and when needed.
The Sarkaria Commission had suggested that the ISC and its
Standing Committee should be given the power to set up ad hoc
Sub-Committees to investigate special matters.
Infrequent meetings Giving constitutional or statutory status to the ISC may ensure
that the ISC meets regularly and is given sufficient resources.
Following efforts were taken by the Central Government through 2002 amendment to the
ISWD act, 1956 to overcome these issues:
• Time-bound Constitution: It mandated tribunal constitution within a year of the request.
• Timeframe: The tribunal was required to issue awards within three years, extendable by two
years, establishing a maximum five-year timeframe.
• The Tribunal Awards will have the same force as the order or decree of the Supreme Court.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Way Forward
• Sarkaria Commission: Advocates transferring residuary powers to the Concurrent List, with
tax-related powers retained by the Union.
• Punchhi Commission: Suggests limiting the transfer of subjects to the Concurrent List to
those necessary for national policy uniformity.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The role of Governors in India's federal structure has been a source of ongoing debate and
tension between the Centre and States. This issue highlights the delicate balance of power in
India's federal system and the potential for political conflicts.
Issues: According to a report by PRS Legislative
• Discretionary powers: Governors have Research, between 2011 and 2021,
significant discretionary powers, including in there were over 50 instances of
government formation and dismissal, which can Governors returning bills passed by
be controversial. state legislatures, highlighting the
• Appointment and removal: Governors are frequency of such conflicts.
appointed by the President on the advice of the
Central government, leading to concerns about their neutrality.
• Interference in state affairs: Allegations of Governors overstepping their constitutional role
and interfering in day-to-day governance.
• Delay in decision-making: Instances of Governors delaying assent to bills passed by state
legislatures or withholding nominations to legislative councils.
Recent Examples:
• Maharashtra (2022): The Governor's role in the formation of government after a split in the
ruling alliance was heavily criticized.
• Tamil Nadu (2023): Controversy over the Governor's delay in forwarding bills passed by the
state assembly to the President for assent.
• Kerala (2023): Ongoing tension between the Governor and state government over
university appointments and policy decisions.
Causes Impact
1. Political appointments: Governors are often 1. Political instability: Controversial
former politicians, raising questions about decisions by Governors can lead to
their impartiality. governmental crises and legal battles.
2. Lack of clear guidelines: The Constitution 2. Erosion of federal principles:
provides broad discretionary powers Perceived misuse of Governor's office
without specific guidelines for their exercise. can weaken the federal structure.
3. Centre-State power dynamics: Governors 3. Delayed governance: Conflicts
sometimes seen as tools for the Central between Governors and state
government to exert control over governments can hinder policy
opposition-ruled states. implementation and legislative
processes.
Judicial Perspective: The Supreme Court, in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), emphasized
that Governors should act impartially and not according to the wishes of the Central
government.
• More recently, in Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016), the Court limited the Governor's
discretionary powers in summoning the assembly.
5.8.1. Governor’s Power under Article 200
Supreme Court’s Judgement on Governor’s powers under Article 200
In a 2025 judgement, the Supreme Court clarified the powers of the Governor under Article
200 of the Constitution:
• Interpretation of Article 200: Once a bill is passed by the state legislature, it must be
placed before the Governor, who can only either grant assent, withhold assent, or reserve
the bill for the President. These are mutually exclusive options.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2.1. PRIs
India has three tier system of PRIs—at village,
intermediate, and district levels. However, a state
having a population not exceeding 20 lakhs may not
constitute panchayats at the intermediate level.
2.2. ULBs
The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992
mandates the establishment of three types of
municipalities in every state—Municipal Corporations
(for larger urban areas), Municipalities (for smaller urban areas), and Nagar Panchayats (for
transitional areas). Apart from this, there are other specialized forms of urban local governments
that aren’t created by 74th Amendment Act specifically.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
Despite the 73rd Constitutional • Raising own cadre of functionaries for
Amendment, states often retain panchayats: A key solution to the devolution of
control over appointments, functionaries in PRIs is the complete transfer of
transfers, and supervision of administrative staff under their direct control.
functionaries. • Clear service rules for local functionaries, ensuring
Functionaries remain answerable to their appointment, transfer, and supervision are
state departments rather than PRIs, managed at the Panchayat level.
leading to accountability gaps, poor • Strengthening capacity-building programs and
coordination, and inefficiency in incentivizing rural postings can further enhance
implementing grassroots schemes. local governance and improve service delivery.
3.1.4. Issues related to Gram Sabhas
Issues Recommendations
• Irregular Meetings: Gram Sabha • Clarification of Functions and Jurisdiction:
meetings are often held irregularly To strengthen the Gram Sabha, the 73rd
and sometimes only to meet Amendment should clearly define its
administrative formalities. As a functions and powers, similar to the PESA
result, the decisions made in these Act. Granting it original jurisdiction will
meetings are frequently ignored or empower the Gram Sabha to make decisions
disregarded. on local governance matters.
• Lack of Awareness: There is a • Capacity Building and Awareness: Focus on
widespread lack of awareness about capacity building and awareness programs
the powers and responsibilities of to educate the public and Gram Panchayat
the Gram Sabha. Both the general members about the rights and powers of the
public and Gram Panchayat members Gram Sabha.
(such as the Sarpanch or Pradhan) are • Strengthening Monitoring and
often unaware of the specific roles Accountability: Enhance the monitoring
and functions of the Gram Sabha. system at the Block level to track the
• Unclear Role and Functioning: Many progress of each Gram Sabha, recording
State Acts do not clearly define the metrics like membership, meetings held,
powers of Gram Sabhas, and there attendance, and committee formation.
are no standard procedures for their • Ensuring Binding Decisions and Inclusivity:
functioning. The mandatory powers of the Gram Sabha
In addition, the penalties for failing to should be binding. Additionally, State
fulfill responsibilities are often not governments must enforce a quorum
outlined, making it difficult to ensure requirement for meetings, ensuring
accountability. participation of Panchayat representatives,
especially women, to promote inclusivity
and respect for its authority.
3.1.5. Issues related to Three-tier-model
Issues Recommendations
The act does not specify which level of To address this issue, the Punchhi Commission
Panchayat will perform what functions. and the 2nd ARC recommended adopting an
This lack of clarity has led to varied 'activity mapping' approach to clearly define
approaches across states, with each state and assign specific functions to each tier of the
adopting its own model for allocating Panchayat, uniformly based on the principle of
responsibilities among the three levels of subsidiarity.
Panchayats.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
Reservation for Women and Limited • Reservation for Multiple Terms: To
Participation ensure continued representation and
• Reservation for women in Panchayats is opportunity for re-election, it is
often not in proportion to their recommended that seats reserved for
population. This has resulted in many marginalized sections, including women
reserved seats remaining vacant. and SC/ST communities, be made
• Sarpanch Pati Issue: In certain cases, the available for more than one term. This
husbands of elected women Sarpanchs would allow these groups to maintain a
take over the functioning of the presence in decision-making and
Panchayat, making decisions on behalf of governance.
their wives. • Awareness, Training, and Promotion of
• This practice undermines the Gender-Sensitive Policies: It is essential
empowerment of women in Panchayati to conduct programs that empower and
Raj Institutions (PRIs) and restricts their educate women Sarpanchs about their
active participation in governance, rights, responsibilities, and leadership
despite holding the official position. skills in local governance. Additionally,
Exclusion of Marginalized Groups governments should promote gender-
In some areas, marginalized sections of sensitive policies at the local level to
society, including SCs and STs, face systemic ensure equal participation of women in
exclusion from contesting elections. decision-making processes, fostering a
• Influential figures, often belonging to more inclusive governance structure
upper castes or higher social classes, • Strict Enforcement of Protection Laws:
dominate the proceedings of Gram Enforcing strict laws to ensure women
Sabhas. These individuals, referred to as representatives can exercise their
bigwigs, tend to control decision-making, powers independently, without
sidelining the voices of marginalized interference from male relatives or
groups. others, is essential. Legal action should
• Illiteracy, particularly among women and be taken against atrocities committed
SC/ST communities, significantly hinders against women and marginalized
their ability to effectively participate in communities, creating a safer, more
Panchayat activities. inclusive environment.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
Parastatal bodies are partially or wholly owned The 2nd ARC Report on Local
and managed by the government. They are Governance suggests that with the
formed either under state statutes or Societies establishment of democratic
Registration Act. These are created for delivery of decentralization at the district and
specific services or implementation of programs. Panchayat levels, there is no longer a
For ex- District Rural Development Agency need for a separate agency like the
(DRDA), District Water and Sanitation District Rural Development Agency
Committee, etc. (DRDA).
• Many activities of many of these organisations States such as Kerala, Karnataka, and
are in the matters in the Eleventh Schedule of West Bengal have already merged
the Constitution, their separate existence DRDAs with the District Panchayats, and
with considerable fund and staff at their other states should follow suit to
disposal, the Panchayats don’t get enough streamline governance and reduce
say in the process and this creates an redundancy in administrative bodies.
impediment to effective functioning and
empowerment of Panchayats.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Issues Recommendations
1. Inadequate Devolution of Power and Lack of Adopting the Triple F's Paradigm—
Autonomy: Functions, Finances, and
The devolution of powers to Urban Local Bodies Functionaries—as seen in Kerala's
(ULBs) remains limited, with some states providing People's Plan Model. This model
more autonomy than others. emphasizes devolution of powers to
ULBs, allowing them to effectively
• The rise of Special Purpose Agencies (SPAs) such
manage urban governance.
as SPVs under the Smart Cities Mission and • To improve urban service
parastatal agencies like BDA and BBMP in delivery, ULBs should be
Bangalore, has further centralized power, mandated to hold public hearings
bypassing ULBs. This has fragmented governance before finalizing city
and poor coordination, as seen with agencies or development plans and engage
the overlapping agencies in Delhi. voluntary non-governmental
agencies. Establishing a
Municipal Ombudsman would
ensure accountability and speed
up the redressal of grievances.
• 2nd ARC proposed the creation of
Area Sabhas, similar to the Gram
Sabhas in rural areas, to
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Poly-centricity
Polycentricity refers to a decentralized governance model where multiple centers of
authority or governance function independently but cooperatively within a larger system. It
contrasts with a monocentric or centralized approach, where power is concentrated in a single
authority.
To realize the vision of the 74th Amendment, ULBs must prioritize financial sustainability (via
property tax reforms, innovative financing), capacity-building, and holistic urban planning.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Emerging trends such as blockchain, Generative AI, autonomous systems, and sustainability will
continue to shape the future of AI in local governance. Local governments must be proactive in
adopting responsible AI frameworks to balance technological advancements with public trust
and equity.
6. Conclusion
While local institutions in India have made strides toward enhancing their functionality, critical
challenges remain in terms of financial independence, administrative capacity, political
interference, and accountability. Addressing these challenges is crucial for improving the
efficiency and effectiveness of local governance, enabling these institutions to better serve the
needs of citizens, particularly in the context of rapid urbanization and complex socio-economic
issues. To enhance public service delivery and effectively address the challenges in both urban
and rural areas, it is essential to improve coordination, establish clarity in mandates for
accountability, ensure transparency, and strengthen fiscal systems.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Constitutional Bodies
Constitutional bodies are the cornerstones of a well-functioning democracy. These institutions
are established and enshrined in the constitution. They play a crucial role in upholding the rule
of law. They are essential for protecting fundamental rights and ensuring effective governance.
Important constitutional bodies
Constitutional Provision Constitutional Body
Union Public Service Commission
Article 315
State Public Service Commission
Article 280 Finance Commission of India
Article 324 Election Commission of India
Article 148 Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Article 76(3) Attorney General of India
Article 338 National Commission for Scheduled Castes
Article 338A National Commission for Scheduled Tribes
Article 338B National Commission for Backward Classes
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Primary Role The Commission’s role was limited to The Commission expanded its focus
reservations and list-related matters, to include the comprehensive socio-
primarily focusing on recommending economic development of SEBCs.
changes to the OBC list for inclusion This includes actively monitoring
or exclusion of communities. safeguards, addressing grievances,
and ensuring their overall welfare.
Caste Census
Scholars like Satish Deshpande have argued that naming and counting caste could eventually
lead to its erosion by
bringing it out into the
open, making it visible
to critique and policy
reform. However, opponents argue that a caste census is more likely to reinvigorate caste
consciousness, institutionalize divisions, and provide the political class with a sophisticated
arsenal for caste-based mobilization and manipulation.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Since State surveys may create inconsistencies due to variations in caste names, spellings, and
statuses across regions, conducting a national caste-based census, led by the central
government with state cooperation, should occur to ensure accuracy and consistency.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Indian Constitution initially had no provision for a Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities.
Following the States Reorganization Commission’s recommendation (1953-55), the Seventh
Amendment in 1956 introduced Article 350-B, establishing this role. The Special Officer,
appointed by the
President,
investigates issues
related to linguistic
minorities’
safeguards and reports to the President.
Objectives
1) To provide equal opportunities to the linguistic minorities for inclusive development and
national integration
2) To spread awareness amongst the linguistic minorities about the safeguards available to
them
3) To ensure effective implementation of the safeguards provided for the linguistic minorities
in the Constitution and other safeguards, which are agreed to by the states / U.T.s
4) To handle the representations for redress of grievances related to the safeguards for
linguistic minorities
1.7.1. Role and Functions
The Commissioner takes up all the
matters pertaining to the grievances
arising out of the non-implementation of
the Constitutional and Nationally Agreed
Scheme of Safeguards provided to linguistic minorities and recommends remedial actions to be
taken.
1) To investigate all matters related to safeguards provided to the linguistic minorities
2) To submit to the President of India, the reports on the status of implementation of the
Constitutional and the nationally agreed safeguards for the linguistic minorities
3) To monitor the implementation of safeguards through questionnaires, visits, conferences,
seminars, meetings, review mechanism, etc.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Solicitor-General of India
• The Solicitor General of India (SGI) serves as a supporting legal officer to the Attorney
General (AG) and holds the position of a secondary law officer in India. It is important to
note that while the post of the Attorney General is constitutional, the positions of the
Solicitor-General and the Additional Solicitor Generals are statutory. The appointment of
the Solicitor General is made by the President based on the recommendation of the
Appointments Committee of the Cabinet.
• Typically, the term of appointment for the Solicitor General is three years.
Qualifications:
1. Citizen of India
2. At least 5 years’ experience as a judge in a High Court, or a High Court advocate for a
minimum 10 years or a renowned jurist in the eyes of the Appointments Committee of the
Cabinet.
Restrictions: Same as those of the Attorney General of India.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Supreme Court has ruled that recommendations of GST Council only have persuasive value,
and cannot be binding on the Centre and states.
1.12.1. Assessment of GST Council
Since its inception, the GST
Council has played a pivotal
role in shaping India's
indirect tax system. Key
contributions include:
• Centre-State
Collaboration: The GST
Council serves as a
platform for joint
decision-making
between the Centre and
states.
• Simplifying Tax
Structure: The Council
has removed the
cascading effect of
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
1. Quasi-Judicial Body
A Quasi-judicial body is a body that performs functions similar to those of a court, but is not a
court of law. Such a body can
• Adjudicate and decide upon a situation
• Impose penalty upon the guilty or
• Regulate the conduct of an individual or entity.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
• Overburdening of judiciary: As the state has taken on more roles and responsibilities, the
number of cases in the judiciary has increased. This has resulted in an overburdened judicial
system with many pending cases.
• Complexity of laws: With advancements in science and the economy, laws have grown more
complex. This complexity requires a deeper technical understanding of specific sectors.
• Cost: Ordinary judiciary has
Quasi-judicial Action vs. Administrative Action
become dilatory and costly,
resulting in the emergence of Though the distinction between quasi-judicial and
quasi-judicial bodies. administrative action has become blurred, yet it does
• Other factors include: not mean that there is no distinction between the two.
o The conventional judiciary In A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court
is suffering from procedural was of the view that in order to determine whether the
rigidity, which delays action of the administrative authority is quasi-judicial
justice. or administrative, one has to see the nature of power
o Additionally, many conferred, to whom power is given, the framework
decisions that impact within which power is conferred and the
private individuals are made consequences.
not by courts, but by
administrative agencies that exercise judicial powers.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The Law Commission seeks to facilitate the improvement in the quality of Indian legislations,
by ensuring that they are clear, serve their intended purpose and account for current realities.
In doing so, the Commission resultantly engages in both ex-ante and ex-post analyses
Issue:
• Recommendations only persuasive and not binding: Only 33% of recommendations
submitted by the Law Commission by way of 277 reports have been implemented. So, it
has not been much successful in influencing the Indian legislative landscape.
• Issue with its constitution: The Law Commission of India is constituted through an
executive order every three
years. There is no overarching
framework governing the
constitution of the Commission,
and even the act of appointing members to the Commission is unregulated. This led
Commission without a chairperson or members since 2020 till 2024.
Way forward:
• A permanent legislation can be enacted: This would not only ensure the continuous
functioning of a Law Commission, but also enshrine both the high principles and the
specific requirements governing its functioning.
• Reengineer to strengthen its functioning: Efforts towards establishing accountability
mechanisms for the Commission, appointing non-executive persons to maintain its
independence and re-working its composition in such a manner that it comprises not
only members from the legal fraternity but also members who belong to allied fields
such as economics, sociology and political science. Codes of Conduct that would impose
mandatory disclosures of potential conflicts of interest can be implemented.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was established under the Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993. This Act mandates the creation of the NHRC at the national level and
commissions at the state level.
The NHRC's role is to protect human rights, which include life, liberty, equality, and dignity, as
guaranteed by the Constitution and international covenants. In 2019, the Protection of Human
Rights (Amendment) Act was passed to make the NHRC more inclusive and effective.
2.2.1. Functions of National Human Rights Commission
Other functions:
• Study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and make
recommendations for their effective implementation.
• Encourage the efforts of NGOs and institutions working in the field of human rights.
• Such other function as it may consider it necessary for the protection of human rights.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
The CVC was established in 1964 by an executive resolution upon the recommendation of
Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption (1962-64). In 2003, the Parliament enacted
a law conferring statutory status on the CVC.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
2.5. Lokpal
A Lokpal for the Union and a Lokayukta for each state were both mandated as a result of the
Lokpal and Lokayukta Act of 2013. They act as "ombudsman" and investigate claims of corruption
made against certain public functionaries as well as other things relating to the investigation.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Addressing challenges is essential for Lokpal to realize its true potential in combating corruption
and upholding justice, integrity, and public trust.
2.5.3. Recommendations for Improving Functioning of Lokpal
There have been various proposed reforms to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the
Lokpal in India. Some of these proposed reforms include:
2.5.4. Lokayukta
Lokayukta is an anti-corruption ombudsman in Indian states, established under the Lokpal and
Lokayuktas Act (2013), which mandates states to create this institution within 365 days. The Act
allows states the flexibility to design their Lokayukta mechanism, leading to variations in
structure across different states.
Challenges Faced by Lokayuktas
Issue Details
Only One Section on The Lokpal Act 2013 contains only one section on Lokayukta,
Lokayukta mandating states to enact their own laws within a year, without
detailing composition or powers.
Limited Jurisdiction Lokayuktas in many states lack jurisdiction over the Chief
Minister, Council of Ministers, and MLAs, limiting their ability to
tackle high-level corruption.
Lack of Independence The selection and appointment process of Lokayuktas can be
influenced by political considerations, affecting their autonomy
and impartiality.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI
Over the years, SEBI has put in place robust systems of checks and balances that have
constantly evolved to ensure that India’s securities market and financial system gained the
reputation of being one of the most reliable globally. However, in 2024, SEBI chief Madhabi
Puri Buch, was under attack from Hindenburg Research following its accusations against the
Adani Group. Key issues:
1. Conflict of Interest:
• Chairperson’s offshore investments linked to Adani’s brother raise impartiality
concerns.
• Consultancy firms reportedly earned revenue during her tenure, violating conflict
rules.
• Failure to recuse in Blackstone case tied to her husband’s advisory role questions
neutrality.
2. Investigation Concerns:
• Perceived reluctance to probe Adani’s offshore fund scandal fully (Hindenburg).
• Long investigation duration with limited transparency fuels doubts on SEBI’s
effectiveness.
AHMEDABAD | BENGALURU | BHOPAL | CHANDIGARH | DELHI | GUWAHATI | HYDERABAD | JAIPUR | JODHPUR | LUCKNOW | PRAYAGRAJ | PUNE | RANCHI