Script
Script
Definition:
A flowchart is a visual diagram that shows the sequence of steps in a business process or
activity. It's commonly used in audits to document workflows.
Best Practices:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
REPORTING
Definition:
This phase involves communicating audit findings (also called observations), and suggesting
recommendations.
Best Practices:
Methods of Verification:
Why It Matters:
METRICS
Definition:
Metrics are performance indicators used to measure how well a process or goal is being
achieved.
Remember:
Don’t measure everything—just what truly matters.
Key Concept:
All three elements must work together. Improving one won’t fix the problem if the others are
broken.
Common Mistakes:
Best Practices:
FLOWCHART
A flowchart is a diagram that shows the sequence of steps in a process. Internal auditors use it
to understand how a business activity works and to spot areas for improvement. It’s a visual
representation of processes, and each symbol has a specific meaning, which I’ll explain in the
next slide.
Check completeness – Are there any loops, dead ends, or missing steps?
✅ Advantages:
● Easy to understand
● Great for teaching and analysis
● Helps visualize errors and inefficiencies
● Supports team discussions
❌ Disadvantages:
● Can become too detailed
● May take time to create
● Requires learning the correct symbols
–
Let me walk you through a real-world example of a flowchart using all the symbols:
An ICQ is essentially a list of questions designed to evaluate how well controls are functioning in
a specific area. Auditors use it to collect information quickly and efficiently, especially when
dealing with large departments or multiple locations.
Why is it used?
ICQs are particularly helpful when there's a lot of ground to cover. Instead of interviewing
everyone one by one, auditors can distribute questionnaires to gather input from many people
all at once. This saves time and allows them to identify risks faster.
Type of questions
ICQs can include both open and closed questions. Open-ended questions help uncover details
and explanations, while closed-ended ones give quick, factual answers. Using a mix ensures
the auditor gets both depth and clarity.
ICQs offer many benefits. They’re simple to create, provide consistency in audits, and can be
adjusted to fit different departments or operations. They're a quick way to gather and compare
control-related data.
Disadvantages
However, ICQs have some limitations. Because they're question-based, they might not reveal all
the complexities of a situation. That’s why auditors often use them along with other tools like
interviews or flowcharts.
REPORTING
Reporting is the phase where internal auditors communicate the results of the audit to
management and other stakeholders. It’s not just about pointing out problems—it’s about
sharing insights and solutions, all based on solid evidence.
The purpose of audit reporting is to document what was found, explain why it matters, and
suggest how to fix it. A good audit report is more than a checklist—it’s a tool that drives
improvement and accountability.
CCCER Framework
A strong finding includes five elements—this is called the CCCER model. It starts with the
criteria or what’s expected–it consists of what should exist or occur, then states the condition
or what’s actually happening (what the auditor discovered). The cause explains why there’s a
gap/difference, the effect shows the impact also referred to as the consequence, and lastly, the
recommendation suggests how to fix it.
Findings usually fall into two categories: design deficiencies, where the process itself is
flawed, and operating deficiencies, where the process exists but isn’t working as it should.
Identifying which type it is helps management respond more effectively.
Best practices
While the CCCER model includes R for recommendation, this doesn’t mean that the auditor has
to formulate every recommendation every time. In most experiences, telling the clients what to
do presents two key problems: Dependency and Lack of Ownership
A good practice is to involve the process owners—the people directly responsible for the area
being audited. Letting them review findings first encourages transparency, ownership, and often
better solutions.
FOLLOW-UP
That brings us to Follow-Up. This is where auditors check whether the recommended
corrective actions were actually implemented—and whether they worked.
If follow-ups don’t happen, it could mean serious problems are left unresolved. Worse, it might
send a message that audit results aren’t taken seriously. This phase protects the value of the
audit and helps improve the organization.
When to follow-up?
Depends on the severity of the finding:
The timing of follow-up depends on how risky the issue is. For critical problems like system
failures or safety threats, the auditor should check right away. For less urgent issues, a few
months is more realistic.
Methods
To follow up, auditors might review updated policies, check new transaction records, visit the
workplace, or even redo some of their original tests. The goal is to confirm the problem was
corrected properly.
Redflags
Sometimes, even after a follow-up, the problem is still there. That might be because the fix only
addressed the surface issue—or the solution didn’t stick. In some cases, management might not
act at all, which is a major red flag.
A successful follow-up means the problem has been resolved, and the solution is effective.
This shows that internal audit isn't just about pointing out flaws—but actually helping improve
the organization.
METRICS
Metrics are simply ways of measuring performance. In internal auditing, they allow us to
compare what should be happening versus what is actually happening—and that’s key in
identifying areas for improvement.
We’ve all heard the phrase, “what gets measured gets managed.” If something is important, we
should track it. Metrics help managers and auditors identify weaknesses and make better
decisions based on real data.
Not all data is useful. Good metrics are purpose-driven—they support goals, are easy to
understand, and trigger action. It’s also important to present them in ways that fit your audience:
top-level summaries for executives, and detailed breakdowns for front-line managers.
A great tool for organizing metrics is the balanced scorecard. It’s a framework that combines
different kinds of metrics (financial & non-financial) to give a full picture—not just profits, but also
customer satisfaction, process efficiency, and employee development.
Lastly, I want to talk about the three pillars of operational success: People, Processes, and
Technology.
You can’t fix a broken process just by buying new software or hiring more people. These three
elements—people, processes, and technology—must work together in harmony. If one is weak,
the whole system suffers.
For example, if a company has a confusing payment system, adding new employees won’t help
unless the process itself is redesigned. And even the best technology can’t fix things if
employees aren’t trained or motivated to use it. Real success comes from aligning skills,
structures, and tool
Mistakes
Many organizations make the mistake of jumping to a quick fix—like buying a fancy new system
or hiring more people. But if the underlying process is flawed, these efforts won’t help. And if
people don’t understand or accept the changes, the improvement won’t last.
Practice
So what should organizations do instead? They should approach change holistically—fix the
process, train and support the people, and make sure the technology is the right fit.
Communication is critical so everyone understands what’s changing and why.