Deep Seek
Deep Seek
Intrinsic value: True underlying value based on company's fundamentals, distinct from market price
Assumptions:
Given:
Subsequent growth = 5%
Year 1: 1.50 × 1.07 = 1.605Year2:1.605×1.07=1.605Year2:1.605×1.07=1.717
Year 3: 1.717 × 1.07 = 1.837Year4:1.837×1.05=1.837Year4:1.837×1.05=1.929
Year 5: 1.929 × 1.05 = $2.025
Firm value = FCF<sub>1</sub>/(r - g) = (150 × 1.05)/(0.10 - 0.05) = 157.5/0.05 = Rs. 3,150 million
Alternative criteria:
4. Payback Period
6. Profitability Index
Project A:
NPV = -300 - 387/(1.12) - 193/(1.12)<sup>2</sup> - 100/(1.12)<sup>3</sup> + 600/(1.12)<sup>4</sup> +
600/(1.12)<sup>5</sup> + 850/(1.12)<sup>6</sup> - 180/(1.12)<sup>7</sup>
= -300 - 345.54 - 153.87 - 71.18 + 381.31 + 340.46 + 430.74 - 81.43
= Rs. 200.49
Project B:
NPV = -405 + 134 × PVIFA(12%,6) + 50/(1.12)<sup>7</sup>
= -405 + 134 × 4.1114 + 50 × 0.4523
= -405 + 550.93 + 22.62
= Rs. 168.55
(2) IRR
Project B:
0 = -405 + 134 × PVIFA(r,6) + 50/(1+r)<sup>7</sup>
Approximately 19.0%
Project A:
Positive CFs compounded to FV at 12%: 600×1.12² + 600×1.12 + 850 + (-180) = 752.64 + 672 + 850 - 180 =
2094.64
MIRR: (2094.64/870.59)<sup>1/7</sup> - 1 ≈ 13.6%
Project B:
At WACC=12%:
Both projects have positive NPV, but A has higher NPV (200.49 vs 168.55)
Both IRR > WACC, but B has higher IRR (19.0% vs 18.1%)
At WACC=18%:
Need to recalculate NPVs:
Project A NPV ≈ -48
Project B NPV ≈ 20
Now only Project B has positive NPV, so choose B
Crossover rate where both projects have same NPV is around 14-15%
Recalculate using same method but with 18% financing and reinvestment rates
Project A:
PV of negative CFs at 18%: -300 - 387/1.18 - 193/1.18² - 100/1.18³ ≈ -798.30
FV of positive CFs at 18%: 600×1.18² + 600×1.18 + 850 - 180 ≈ 835.44 + 708 + 850 - 180 ≈ 2213.44
MIRR: (2213.44/798.30)<sup>1/7</sup> - 1 ≈ 15.4%
Project B:
PV of negative CFs: -405
FV of positive CFs: 134 × FVIFA(18%,6) + 50 ≈ 134 × 9.4420 + 50 ≈ 1315.23
MIRR: (1315.23/405)<sup>1/7</sup> - 1 ≈ 18.8%