1

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

FIRST CLASS AT ANDHERI MUMBAI

C. C. NO. 833/ PW/2020

State (Sahar Police station) … Complainant

Versus

Mrs. Nayomi Jay Raju Golla

………. Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption on behalf Accused U/s 317 of

Cr.P.C

That The Accused is charged with (U/ss, 465,468,471,420,34,

of I.P.C.) and his attendance is not necessary, Due to, his Brother

has been expired , So he cannot Appear before this court. today.

It is therefore prayed that Your Honor may be pleased to

dispense with the attendance of the Accused (Nayomi JayRaju

Golla) for the present and proceed with the matter in the interest

of Justice and may pass such other order or orders as this Court

may think fit and proper.

Place: Mumbai
 2

Date: 25. 06 .2025 Advocate for the Accused

IN THE COURT OF 1ST CLASS JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE 23rd COURT AT ESPLANDE COURT
MUMBAI

C. C. NO. 40/PW/2020

State (Cuff parade police station) …. .

Complainant

Versus

Mr. Ravikant Ramdas Tiwari

…….accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption on

behalf Accused U/s 317 of
Cr.P.C

That The Accused is charged with (U/ss, 509,354(d)

(ii) ,of I.P.C.) and his attendance is not necessary, Due
to, he has out of Bombay for his urgent works, So he
cannot Appear before this court. today.

It is therefore prayed that Your Honor may be

pleased to dispense with the attendance of Accused
(Ravikant Tiwari) for the present and proceed with the
matter in the interest of Justice and may pass such other
orders or orders as this Court may think fit and proper.
 3

(Mr. Sushil
Kumar Tiwari)

Place : Mumbai

Dated : 24/12/2024 Advocate for the

Accused

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

14th COURT AT GIRGAUN MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 3466 SS/2015

M/S YASH INTERPRISES

…..Complainant

Versus

Mr. DEEPAK KADAM

………. Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption on

behalf Accused

That in aforesaid matter is kept for bank witness of

Complainant, but the notice has not been collected till
date . and Accused is not present today, due to out of
station for his urgent works . therefore he can not
appear before this Honorable court today .
 4

Therefore the Accused may be Exempted to- day for

Appearance to this Honorable Court.

For this act of kindness I shall ever pray.

Place: Mumbai

Dated: 23rd January 2024 Advocate for the

Accused

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST

CLASS ,10th COURT AT ANDHERI MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 448 /SW/2017

Mr. KAUSER KHAN …………

Complainant

Versus

Mrs. SHAKILA SHER KHAN & 2 anr.

………. Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption

on behalf of Accused

That above said matter is kept for Evidence before

Charge of the Complainant but the Accused are not
 5

present today before this Honorable court. because he

has gone to Ajmer for Religious purpose , Therefore,
they cannot Appear before this court. today.

Kindly, the Accused may be exempted today for its

appearance

I undertake they remain present on next date.

For this act of kindness, the Accused shall pray.

Place: Mumbai ( Mr. Sushil

Kumar Tiwari )

Date: 08/01/2025 Advocate for

the Accused

IN THE COURT OF1ST CLASS JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE 48th COURT AT ANDHERI MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 1875/ SUM/2023

M/s Vijay sales corporation ….

Complainant

Versus

Mr. Aditya Thakkar ………. Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Withdraw of the above said

Complaint
 6

This humble Application most respectfully sheath :

1. That the above-named complainant has been filed

the case U/ss. 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument
Act,1882 against the above-named accused.

2. That the above said matter has been amicable settled

among the Complainant (M/s Vijay Sales
Corporation) through Atul Shethia and the
Accused and the both agreed to withdraw the above
mentioned case and finally the complainant is ready
to withdraw the case and not to proceed further .

3. It is therefore, prayed that this court may be pleased

to allow the complaint to withdraw the case from this
Honorable court and the accused may be allowed to
be acquitted from the case.

Signature of Complainant Signature of

Advocate Place - Mumbai

Date – 11.11.2024

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE & ADDL. C.J.M. 4TH COURT AT BHACHAU

C.C. NO. / 674 /2023

M/s Aditya Enterprises

through Krishnadevsinh Surendrasinh Jadeja …

Complainant

Versus
 7

M/s Laxmi Chemfood Products Pvt.ltd. & anr …

Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Withdraw of the above said

Complaint

This humble Application most respectfully shew eth :

4. That the abovenmaed complainant has been filed the

case U/ss. 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument
Act,1882 against the abovenmaed accused.

5. That the above said matter has been amicable settled

among the complainant(M/s Aditya Enterprises
through Krishnadevsinh Surendrasinh Jadeja and
the accused and the both were agreed to withdraw
the above mentioned case and finally the
complainant is ready to withdraw the case and not to
proceed further .

6. It is therefore ,prayed that this court may be pleased

to allow the complaint to withdraw the case from this
Honorable court and the accused may be allowed to
be acquitted from the aforementioned case .

Signature of Complainant Signature of

Advocate Place - Mumbai

Date - 11.12.2023

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

66 th COURT AT ANDHERI MUMBAI
C.C. NO. 2119 / PW/2023
State (Powai Police station ) …
Complainant
 8

Versus
Mr. Ved prakash Chhotelal Tiwari
………. Accused
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Seeking

Permission to compounding
the above said matter

This Humble application most respectfully shew eth :

1. That the abovenmaed Complainant has lodged the

F.IR. Under C.R NO.125/2023 and Charge U/s
324 ,504 of I.P.C. against the abovenmaed Accused
are pending before this Hon,ble Court..

2. That the above said matter has been amicable settled

between the Original Complainant (Mrs.
Priyanka Tiwari) who is legally wedded wife of the
Accused. and she does not desirous to Examine
before the Hon,ble Court. Hence It may be Closed.

3. It is therefore ,prayed that the alleged offence U/s

324, 504 are cognizable , punishment up to 3 years
and Non -Compoundable.Therefore , this Court may
be Pleased to allow to Compounding the case
before this Honorable court .

For this act of Kindness .we shall ever pray

Signature of Complainant Signature

of Accused

Date : 06.04.2024 Advocate for

the Accused
 9

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

26TH COURT AT BORIVALI MUMBAI

NOTICE NO. 476 /N/2023

Dr. Pallavi Bipin Bhandare …

Complainant

Versus

1. State of Maharashtra

2. Bank of Maharashtra
…..Respondent no.2

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption

on behalf of the
Respondent no.2

That in aforesaid matter the Respondent no.2 is

bank and his authorized person is busy in bank works
toady .

Therefore he can not appear before this Honorable

court

Kindly the appearance of Respondent no.2 may be

Exempted toady .

For this act of kindness the respondent no.2 shall

ever pray.

Place ; mumbai

Date : 2nd day of august 2023

 10

Advocate for the Respt.no.2

( Mr. Sushil Kumar Tiwari

Advocate )

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

26TH COURT AT BORIVALI MUMBAI

NOTICE NO. 476 /N/2023

Dr. Pallavi Bipin Bhandare …

Complainant

Versus

1. State of Maharashtra

2. Bank of Maharashtra
…..Respondent no.2

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Exemption

on behalf of the
Respondent no.2

That in aforesaid matter the Respondent no.2 is

bank and his authorized person is busy in bank works
toady .

Therefore, he cannot appear before this Honorable

court
 11

Kindly the appearance of Respondent no.2 may be

Exempted toady.

For this act of kindness, the respondent no.2 shall

ever pray.

Place; mumbai

Date : 2nd day of august 2023 Adv. for the

Respondent no.2

Mr.Sushil Kumar
Tiwari Advocate )

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST

CLASS 44TH COURT AT ANDHERI , MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 2901 /SS/2021

M/s GAJANAN IMAGING PRINT

SOLUTION .Complainant

Versus

Mr.PRAMOD SHANKAR GHATGE …

Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for No- Say

order of The
Application U/S 143 OF
 12

N.I.ACT. against
abovenamed accused

That in aforesaid matter the Complainant has filed

the Application U/s 143 of N.I. Act. In aforesaid matter
but the Accused is not filed the say on that application
to till date . it seems ,the Accused is not interested in
this matter .

Therefor No- say order may be passed .

For this act of kindness the Complainant shall ever

pray.

Place ; Mumbai

Date : 05/04/ 2025

Advocate for the Complainant

( Mr.Sushil Kumar Tiwari

Advocate )

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

63 rd COURT AT ANDHERI MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 6053 / SS/2015

M/S Laxmi Chemfood Products Pvt.Ltd.

..Complainant

Versus

Mr. KRISHNAKANT Prop.

 13

Of M/s Shri Harikrishna Interprises ………

Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Application for Withdraw of the Abovesaid

Complaint

This Humble application most respectfully shew eth :

1. That the abovenmaed complainant has been filed the

case U/s 138 r/w 141 of N.I.Act agianst the
abovenmaed accused.

2. That the abovesaid matter has been amicable settlled

among the complainant ( Laxmi Chemfood products
Pvt.Ltd.) and the accused and the both were agreed
to withdraw the above mentioned case and finally the
complainant is ready to withdraw the case and not to
proceed further .

3. It is therefore ,prayed that this court may be pleased

to allow the complaint to withdraw the case from this
Honorable court and the accused may be allowed to
be acquitted from the aforementioned case .

Signature of complainant Signature of

Advocate

Place - Mumbai

Date - 04.09.2023

INTHE COURT OF 1ST CLASS JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE 71st COURT AT BANDRA MUMBAI
 14

C.C. NO. 923/PW/2009

State ( Vakola Police Station )

………….Complainant

Versus

Mr. Anil Mahendrapratap Mishra ……….

Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

Ap
plication for Exemption on
behalf Accused U/s 317 of
Cr.P.C

That The Accused is charged with (U/s 380 of I.P.C.)

and his attendance is not necessary, Due to, he has out

of Bombay for his urgent works , So he cannot Appear

before this court. today.

It is therefore prayed that Your Honor may be

pleased to dispense with the attendance of the Accused

(Anil Mehendrapratap Mishra ) for the present and

proceed with the matter in the interest of Justice and

may pass such other order or orders as this Court may

think fit and proper.

Place: Mumbai
 15

Date: 23/06/ 2025 ( Mr. Sushil Kumar

Tiwari)

Advocate for the

Complaint

THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

48th COURT AT ANDHERI MUMBAI

Summary Case /4801875/2023

VIJAY SALES CORPORATION ……Complainant

Versus

Mr. Aditya Thakkar ……….

Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

APPLICATION FOR Reissue the summons to the

Accused abovenmaed on New Address.

That in aforesaid matter The Honorable court has

been issued the Summon for the appearance to the
abovenamed accused . but the said summon has been
returned as remarked “ item returned Addressee Left
Without instructions”. Therefore it is UN-served.

Hence the complainant is praying to this Honorable

court to reissues the summons as given following
address.

OM TOYS , SHOP NO- 4

For this act of kindness I shall ever pray.

 16

Place : Mumbai Adv. for the

Complainant

Date : 31st January 2024

IN THE COURT OF MATROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

14th COURT AT GIRGAUN MUMBAI

C.C. NO. 3466 SS/2015

M/S YASH INTERPRISES

…..Complainant

Versus

Mr. DEEPAK KADAM

………. Accused

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR

APPLICATION FOR ISSUE THE

SUMMONS TO THE POSTAL
DEPT. FOR WITNESS .

That in aforesaid matter is kept for defence witness,

but the Accused in his defence to pray to this
Honorable Court to issue the summons to the Postal
Department regarding the service of demand notice
which is MARKED AS “UNCLAIMED “ .
 17

The Accused submits that the demand notice dated

16.01.2015 was not delivered to me ,as address given
by the Complainant in his notice .

Therefore , kindly issue the summons to the Post

office, at Andheri ( East)Mumbai -400099 ,for
examination before this Honorable Court.

For this act of kindness I shall ever pray.

Place: Mumbai

Dated: 6th March , 2024 Advocate for

the Accused

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION

PALGHAR /DAHANU

SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT NO. 39 OF 2023

Bank of Maharashtra
……….Plaintiff

Versus

M/s Maya General Stores

Prop. Mr. Suresh L. Jain (Borrower ) ………

Defendants

APPLICATION FOR RE-ISSUE THE

SUMMONS TO THE
ABOVENMAED DEFENDNAT
UPON HIS NEW ADDRESS:

May it please Your Honour :

 18

That in aforesaid matter is kept for awaiting

notice to the abovenmaed defendant .But the
Plaintiff has found his new address from some
reliable sources , which is as below:

M/s Maya General Stores

Prop. Mr. Suresh L. Jain (Borrower )

Residence address : Flat no.1 A-wing

Meenakshi Complex Shroff Trade Centre Near
Madhuri Sweets Boisar -401501

Therefore the Plaintiff is praying to this Hon’ble

Court to Reissue the Summons to the Defendant
abovenmaed and serve through Court Beliefs

For ths act of Kindness ,the plaintiff shall ever pray

Place : Palghar

Dated : 15/02/2024

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION

PALGHAR /DAHANU

SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT NO. 39 OF 2023

Bank of Maharashtra
……….Plaintiff

Versus

M/s Maya General Stores

Prop. Mr. Suresh L. Jain (Borrower ) ………

Defendants

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION
 19

May it please Your Honour :

I MR. SACHIN AGRAWAL AGE . 35 YRS

Occupation Service and branch manager of plaintiff
bank abovenamed and having address at CFC
Building Takinaka ,MIDC Tarapur Dist Palghar do
hereby solemn affirmation as under :

1. That in aforesaid matter is kept for awaiting

notice to the abovenmaed defendant .But the
Plaintiff has found his new address from some
reliable sources , which is as below:

M/s Maya General Stores

Prop. Mr. Suresh L. Jain (Borrower )

Residence address : Flat no.1 A-wing Meenakshi

Complex Shroff Trade Centre Near Madhuri

Sweets

Boisar -401501

2. Therefore the Plaintiff is praying to this Hon’ble

Court to Reissue the Summons to the Defendant
abovenmaed and serve through Court Beliefs

For ths act of Kindness ,the plaintiff shall ever pray

Deponent

VERIFICATION

I MR. SACHIN AGRAWAL AGE . 35 YRS

Occupation Service and branch manager of plaintiff
bank abovenamed and having address at CFC
Building Takinaka ,MIDC Tarapur Dist Palghar that
 20

whatever stated in forging para are true and correct

with my best of knowledge and believe and same I
believe is true .

Place : Palghar

Dated : 15/02/2024
deponent

Identified by me

before me

Advocate for the Plaintiff

IN THE COURT OF CIVIL

JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION
PALGHAR /DAHANU

SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT NO. 39

OF 2023
21

Bank of Maharashtra

….Plainti
ff

Versus

M/s Maya General Stores

Prop. Mr. Suresh L. Jain

(Borrower ) ………
Defendants

AFFIDAVIT IN
SUPPORT OF
APPLICATION

Dated --th day of march

2025

Sushil Kumar Tiwari

Advocate for the Plaintiff

Office : Unit no.12 ground
floor Madhuban ind.
Premises off. Mahakali
caves road mobile no.
9323191222 Email id.
[email protected]