I Need Someone to Do My Chemistry Homework
I Need Someone to Do My Chemistry Homework
Chemistry Homework
1. Step
To get started, you must first create an account on site StudyHub.Vip.
The registration process is quick and simple, taking just a few moments.
During this process, you will need to provide a password and a valid
email address.
2. Step
In order to create a "Write My Paper For Me" request, simply complete the
10-minute order form. Provide the necessary instructions, preferred
sources, and deadline. If you want the writer to imitate your writing style,
attach a sample of your previous work.
3. Step
When seeking assignment writing help from StudyHub.Vip, our platform
utilizes a bidding system. Review bids from our writers for your request,
choose one of them based on qualifications, order history, and feedback,
then place a deposit to start the assignment writing.
4. Step
After receiving your paper, take a few moments to ensure it meets your
expectations. If you're pleased with the result, authorize payment for the
writer. Don't forget that we provide free revisions for our writing services.
5. Step
When you opt to write an assignment online with us, you can request
multiple revisions to ensure your satisfaction. We stand by our promise to
provide original, high-quality content - if plagiarized, we offer a full
refund. Choose us confidently, knowing that your needs will be fully met.
Hardy
Theory evaluation: o meaningful and logical adequacy o Operational and empirical adequacy o
Testability o Generality o Contribution to understanding o Predictability o Pragmatic adequacy
Logical adequacy (diagramming) identifying all theoretical terms (concepts, constructs, operational
definitions, referents).
Theory is a set of interrelated concepts and statements
Emprical adequacy single most important criterion for evaluating a theory applied in practice.
Margaret Ellis o Identified characteristics of significant theories
Scope
Complexity
Testability
Usefulness
Implicit values of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ellis states that theories are insignificant if they do not generate a hypothesis of some sort (Ellis,
1968). Hardy states that a theory is made up of hypothesis derived from axioms, initial hypothesis
or postulates (Hardy, 1973). The second similarity I found between both theorists was the
characteristic of usefulness as a prime characteristic for the significance of a theory. Ellis states
that theories are not considered significant if their usefulness is not explored to develop and
guide practice (Ellis, 1968). Similarly, Hardy has a characteristic of pragmatic adequacy, which is
essentially the usefulness of a theory (Hardy, 1973). The third similarity I found was the
characteristic of information generation used in both theory evaluation approaches. Ellis states
that significant theories are capable of generating a great deal of new information (Ellis, 1968).
Hardy s characteristic of contribution to understanding is similar in that it explores new ideas,
insight, and different ways of looking at the theory (Hardy, 1973). The last similarity I found was
the shared characteristic of generality and scope. Ellis states that the broader the scope of the
theory, the greater the significance of the theory (Ellis, 1968). Similarly, Hardy believes the more
general a theory is; the more useful it is (Hardy, 1973).
I noticed a few differences between the two theorists. The first difference I noted was their views on
the
Complex Moralities (the Hunchback of Notre Dame)
Jessie Harrington Complex Moralities According to Aristotle, for a writer to create an interesting
character it must be morally complex, meaning it must consist of not only good or bad morals,
but both. Victor Hugo s The Hunchback of Notre Dame has a few examples of this trait in its
main characters. Claude Frollo, the priest, shows moral complexity, as he is the novel s antagonist
but is also very compassionate in his feelings toward Esmeralda. Phoebus, who is a nobleman, a
soldier, and the captain of the King s archers, is also one to cheat on his fiance, Fleur de Lys de
Gondelaurier, and later ignore his chance to save Esmeralda during her execution. Quasimodo is
another quality example of moral... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example after he was whipped for an hour all he asked for was water. Everyone listening to
him laughed at him but Esmeralda gave him water. This is ironic because the reason that he was
being whipped was because he attacked Esmeralda, yet she was the only one to show him
sympathy and give him water. Quasimodo was so touched by her kind gesture that from that eye,
hitherto so dry and burning, was seen to roll a big tear, which fell slowly down that deformed
visage so long contracted by despair (Hugo 322). From then on Quasimodo became very loyal to
Esmeralda. Though this is true, he turns on Frollo, the man who raised him and took him in when
he had no one, because he is responsible for Esmeralda s death. During Esmeralda s hanging he
couldn t bare the rage, he took a few steps back from the archdeacon, and then, rushing at him
furiously, with his two huge hands, he struck the priest s back and pushed Dom Claude into the
abyss over which he had been leaning (Hugo 300). Though his morals may not have been
commendable, his heart and intentions are genuine. Frollo s bad decisions and confusing feelings,
Phoebus s corrupt loyalty but heroic stature, and Quasimodo s twisted priorities but kind heart reflect
true imperfection of the human spirit. Victor Hugo used Aristotle s methods of giving a character
moral complexity to make the reader more
A Study On Saudi Arabia Essay
Another issue that was reported in Saudi Arabia was that the majority of breast cancer cases were
presented in the advanced stages as 39.6% and16.9% were in regional (III) and distant (IV) stages
respectively (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health Saudi Cancer Registry, 2012). That was
supported by a Saudi retrospective study carried out by Rudat, Brune Erbe et al. (2012) who
compared data of breast cancerpatients in one of the tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia with American
publications derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between
2004 and 2011.The study revealed that Saudi Arabian breast cancerpatients who were diagnosed with
advanced stage breast cancer composed of 61.2% versus 28.6% of localized stage cancer in the US.
A variation in breast cancer survival rates has been reported, ranging from more than 80% in
North America, Sweden and Japan to around 60% in middle income countries and below 40% in
low income countries (Coleman, Quaresma et al., 2008). The survival rate in Saudi Arabia is
lower compared with the United States and the UK (Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development 2011). As what stands out in the table below in the UK 96% of women survive breast
cancer for at least one year, and this is predicted to fall to 87% surviving for five years or more
(Cancer Research UK, 2011b).
Over the last 30 years, there has been a wide research into the level of people s awareness and the
important factors that influence their judgments and decisions to give an explanation about their
behavior. According to Bargh (2006), in contrast with the cognitive psychology tradition, this
research has