ANNEXURE-1

Academic Task Number: 2 Course Code: ECOM531

Date of allotment: 30th April 2025 Course Title: Managerial Economics
Date of submission: 30 May 2025 Maximum Marks: 30
Academic Task Type: Case Analysis
Academic Task Type: Group Section: Q2455

Question Question Statement Course Bloom’s level Marks per

Number Outcome Question

Q1 Students will be provided with a case, in a group. Generally, CO4, CO5,

this group size will be four students. Students will analyze the CO6 L1, L2, L3, L4, As per rubrics
case from various dimensions and provide the solution. These L5 L6
solution need not to based on correct answer and may have an
open-ended dimension attached with it.
"Investigate the microeconomic problem in developing
economies. Analyze the root causes of persistent problem and
propose microeconomic.
CA will be analysed on the following parameters
I. Report Writing (15 marks)
II. Presentation (15 marks)

Introduction (5 marks)
Context (Background)

Page 1 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Purpose - what is the case study trying to achieve?

Approach - are you using any particular theoretical tools or
research approaches?
Discussion/Analysis (5 marks)
Identification of issues and problems
Links to theories that help you explain the case
Explanation of causes or implications of the issues identified
Possible solutions (if required, check your instructions)
Conclusion (5 marks)
This depends on what you were asked to do but could include:
Main lessons learned
Best solutions and reasons why
Recommendations (may have their own section)
Action plan (may have its own section)

The Presentation will be evaluated on the basis of

Content (5 marks)
Communication (5 marks)
Q & A session (5 marks)
Important Note
Before you attempt to analyse the case, read it thoroughly to
understand what the case is trying to tell. Ask the questions like
What is it talking about?
What are the data sets used?
Who are the parties involved in the case?
It is very important to link the theory with the case. The case

Page 2 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

will not exactly match a theory as the real world is more

complex but there is some link to the theory that is the reason
the case is given to you.

*Plagiarism will be checked (20 per cent of plagiarism is

tolerable).

Rubrics of Evaluation

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1

Introduction (5 marks)

- Context (Background) Thorough & Relevant Good Background Some Context Limited & No Background
Somewhat

Page 3 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1

Relevant

Effective but lacks some Vague & Room for Unclear or Not
- Purpose Clear & Specific specificity interpretation well-defined No Purpose

Clearly Describes Describes Approach

Theoretical Effectively but May Lack Lack Clarity or No Mention of
- Approach Tools/Approaches Some Detail Basic Description Relevance Approach

Discussion/Analysis (5
marks)

Page 4 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1

- Identification of Issues Comprehensive Identifies Most Relevant Few Issues & Lack Some Issues Not
and Problems Discussion Issues but May Miss Some Depth Clearly Related Fails to Identify

Draws Clear and Effective Links, Some Lack Basic Links with Lack Attempts, Not
- Links to Theories Insightful Connections Depth of Insight Clear or Relevant Fails to Link

- Explanation of Causes or Comprehensive & Well- Limited or

Implications Supported Effective with Some Depth Basic Explanations Unclear Fails to Explain

- Possible Solutions (if Well-Reasoned & Reasonable but Lacks Basic Solutions with Limited or No Solutions
required) Practical with Evidence Some Detail Lack of Depth Unclear Provided

Page 5 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1

Conclusion (5 marks)

Summarizes Main Good Summary, May Lack Lack Clarity and

- Main Lessons Learned Lessons Effectively Depth Basic Summary Insight Fails to Mention

Limited or
Good Solutions with Solid Unclear
- Best Solutions and Identifies Best Solutions Reasoning, May Lack Reasonable Solutions Solutions and No Solutions or
Reasons Why with Strong Reasoning Depth with Basic Reasoning Reasons Reasons

Page 6 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Criteria 5 4 3 2 1

- Recommendations (may Practical & Well- Good Recommendations, Basic Limited or No

have own section) Supported Some Lack Detail Recommendations Unclear Recommendations

Reasonably Structured, Limited or

- Action Plan (may have Some Elements May Be Basic Action Plan, Lack Unclear Action
own section) Clear & Well-Structured Lacking of Structure Plan No Action Plan

Page 7 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

The rubric for part II which is presentation is given under

Category 5 marks 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 1 marks

Good Degree of Moderate Degree of Low Degree of Fluency, No Fluency, Speech

High Fluency, Speech flowed well.
Communication Fluency, Speech was Fluency, Speech was Speech appeared to have appeared to have no
Transitions were used.
organized. somewhat organized. little organization organization

Good Quality
Moderate Quality
High Quality Every major point was Some points were
Low Quality and lack of
supported with facts, supported with facts Poor Quality, Points
Content Every major point was well supported with supporter examples were
statistics and or and statistics of were not supported.
several relevant facts, statistics and or provided.
examples, but the questionable
examples.
relevance of some was relevance.
questionable.

Highly Confident, Speaker consistently used Good level of Moderate degree of Low Confidence, Not confident,
Presentation
gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a Confidence, The Confidence, the Speaker used few Speaker rarely made

Page 8 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the Speaker usually used Speaker sometimes gestures, and made little eye contact with the
attention of the audience gestures, eye contact, used gestures, eye eye contact with the audience; Present
tone of voice and a level contact, tone of voice audience ability did not keep
of enthusiasm in a way and a level of the attention of the
that kept the attention of enthusiasm in a way Interviewer

Important Note:
1. The assignment is to be done in a group as allocated to you.
2. Every group member has to submit the file online.
3. Only online submissions will be considered which are made within the stipulated time.
4. While submitting your assignment ensure that it has a cover page mentioning your name, student ID, and section code.
5. Peer rating is compulsory for the assignment. In this, each group member will rate his/her peer out of a maximum
mark of 10.
6. Plagiarism will be checked with the help of Turnitin software and the limit is 30 percent.
7. If two groups are submitting the same assignment then both groups will be awarded zero.
8. Every student will upload the assignment from his/her UMS account.
9. In case of any query feel free to contact your teacher but not question/query will be entertained on the day of submission.

Page 9 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

Details of the group members.

Topics for the report Submission

S. No Case Name Page Number from Geetika and Piyali Group Name
Ghosh book
1 Dabur India Limited: Growing Big PP-61 A
and Global
2 Power for all: Myth or Reality? PP-129 B
3 Disrupting FMCG the Swadeshi Way PP-236 C
4 Geovic Feasibility Study PP-296 D
5 Indian stock market: Does it explains PP-298 E
perfect competition
6 Discriminating all the Way: Indian PP-357 F
Railways
7 David Fights Goliath: The Nirma story PP-349 G
8 Indian cement industry: Riding the PP-381 H
high tide
9 The Herbal Strategy PP-437 I
10 Making Magic: The Multiplex Way PP-92 J
11 3D Printing: the Future of Technology PP- 273 K
12 India in search of way to harness the PP-617 L
inflation ‘Dragon’
13 The Rough Ride from Feature Phones PP-128 M
to Smartphones

Page 10 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

14 Jio: The New Samurai in Telecom PP 408 N

Battle
15 Duopoly in Air PP409 O

GROUP Details:

Serial Registration Roll

No Number Name Number Group
1 12410784 Insha Mubassir RQ2455A02
2 12406160 Steffin Jose RQ2455A03
3 12401145 Darla Jayanth RQ2455A04
4 12413549 Pandarinath Kapalavai RQ2455A05 A
5 12401088 Bonny Thomas RQ2455A06
6 12400265 Reshmi R RQ2455A07
7 12400500 Jay Yadav RQ2455A08
8 12401682 Vaishali Singh RQ2455A09 B
9 12401823 Vennala Satya Priyanka RQ2455A10
10 12404299 Sahil Chawla RQ2455A11
11 12405210 Avneet Kaur RQ2455A12
12 12407963 Chhavi Gupta RQ2455A13 C
13 12411150 Alan James RQ2455A14
14 12411667 Shyam Sudheer RQ2455A15 D

Page 11 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

15 12403598 Kanishka Nallol RQ2455A17

16 12415716 Ashwini Toppo RQ2455A18
17 12403587 Shivang Bhardwaj RQ2455A19
18 12411841 Arjit Pathak RQ2455A20
19 12414831 Jyaanin Chanda RQ2455A21
20 12404013 Satyam Kumar Mehta RQ2455A22 E
21 12403556 Ekampreet Singh RQ2455A23
22 12402350 Abhishek Kumar RQ2455A24
23 12416886 Pranav Singhal RQ2455A26
24 12409174 Adhin A RQ2455A28 F
25 12400520 Prerna Gupta RQ2455A29
26 12400903 Siddharth Singh RQ2455A30
27 12402169 Biswajit Dash RQ2455B31
28 12412344 Yash Jangra RQ2455B32 G
29 12405129 Shrivatsa Manas RQ2455B33
30 12417613 Mansi Sharma RQ2455B34
31 12402414 Naman Jain RQ2455B35
32 12403194 Sagar RQ2455B37 H
33 12403437 Ayush Bhatt RQ2455B38
34 12401799 Harshal Bisht RQ2455B39
35 12402012 Ande Shravya RQ2455B40
36 12401766 Kota Sai Madhuri RQ2455B42 I
37 12407083 Abdul Ahad RQ2455B43
38 12404998 krishan Singh RQ2455B44
39 12410565 Gonnuri Veera Babu RQ2455B47 J

Page 12 of 13
 ANNEXURE-1

40 12403633 Madhanraj M RQ2455B48

41 12402681 Sidharth Singh RQ2455B49
42 12401808 Shibam Dey RQ2455B50
43 12417155 Aryan Sharma RQ2455B51
44 12402095 Arsh Preet Kaur RQ2455B52 K
45 12416407 Steve S Charuvil RQ2455B54
46 12417689 Deepika Sirisha Eleswarapu RQ2455B55
47 12418416 Arya Singh RQ2455B56
48 12418665 Uttkarsh Sharma RQ2455B57 L
49 12419485 Satyam kainth RQ2455B58
50 12419878 Geethika Reddy Koyya RQ2455B59
51 12420035 Akshit Tyagi RQ2455B60
M

Page 13 of 13