"GRDSLAB" --- CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ANALYSIS

Program Description:
"GRDSLAB" is a spreadsheet program written in MS-Excel for the purpose of analysis of concrete slabs on grade. Specifically, a concrete slab on grade may be subjected to concentrated post or wheel loading. Then for the given parameters, the slab flexural, bearing, and shear stresses are checked, the estimated crack width is determined, the minimum required distribution reinforcing is determined, and the bearing stress on the dowels at construction joints is checked. Also, design charts from the Portland Cement Association (PCA) are included to provide an additional method for determining/checking required slab thickness for flexure. The ability to analyze the capacity of a slab on grade subjected to continuous wall (line-type) load as well as stationary, uniformly distributed live loads is also provided. This program is a workbook consisting of eight (8) worksheets, described as follows:

Worksheet Name
Doc Slab on Grade PCA Fig. 3-Wheel Load PCA Fig. 7a-Post Load PCA Fig. 7b-Post Load PCA Fig. 7c-Post Load Wall Load Unif. Load

Description
This documentation sheet Concrete Slab on Grade Analysis for Concentrated Post or Wheel Loading PCA Figure 3 - Design Chart for Single Wheel Loads PCA Figure 7a - Design Chart for Post Loads (k = 50 pci) PCA Figure 7b - Design Chart for Post Loads (k = 100 pci) PCA Figure 7c - Design Chart for Post Loads (k = 200 pci) Concrete Slab on Grade Analysis for Wall Load Concrete Slab on Grade Analysis for Stationary Uniform Live Loads

Program Assumptions and Limitations:

1. This program is based on the following references: a. "Load Testing of Instumented Pavement Sections - Improved Techniques for Appling the Finite Element Method to Strain Predition in PCC Pavement Structures" - by University of Minnesota, Department of Civil Engineering (submitted to MN/DOT, March 24, 2002) b. "Principles of Pavement Design" - by E.J. Yoder and M.W. Witczak (John Wiley & Sons, 1975) c. "Design of Concrete Structures" - by Winter, Urquhart, O'Rourke, and Nilson" - (McGraw-Hill, 1962) d. "Dowel Bar Opimization: Phases I and II - Final Report" - by Max L. Porter (Iowa State University, 2001) e. "Design of Slabs-on-Ground" - ACI 360R-06 - by American Concrete Institute f. "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" (IS195.01D) - by Robert G. Packard (Portland Cement Association, 1976) g. "Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads" Army Technical Manual TM 5-809-12, Air Force Manual AFM 88-3, Chapter 15 (1987) h. "Streses and Stains in Rigid Pavements" (Lecture Notes 3) - by Charles Nunoo, Ph.D., P.E. (Florida International University, Miami FL - Fall 2002) 2. The "Slab on Grade" worksheet assumes a structurally unreinforced slab, ACI-360 "Type B", reinforced only for shrinkage and temperature. An interior load condition is assumed for flexural analysis. That is, the concentrated post or wheel load is assumed to be well away from a "free" slab edge or corner. The original theory and equations by H.M. Westergaard (1926) as modified by Reference (a) in item #1 above are used for the flexual stress analysis. Some of the more significant simplifying assumptions made in the Westergaard analysis model are as follows: a. Slab acts as a homogenous, isotropic elastic solid in equilibrium, with no discontinuities. b. Slab is of uniform thickness, and the neutral axis is at mid-depth. c. All forces act normal to the surface (shear and friction forces are assumed to be negligible). d. Deformation within the elements, normal to slab surface, are considered. e. Shear deformation is negligible. f. Slab is considered infinite for center loading and semi-infinite for edge loading. g. Load at interior and corner of slab distributed uniformly of a circular contact area.

h. Full contact (support) between the slab and foundation.

3. Other basic assumptions used in the flexural analysis of the "Slab on Grade" worksheet are as follows: a. Slab viewed as a plate on a liquid foundation with full subgrade contact (subgrade modeled as a series of independent springs - also known as "Winkler" foundation.) b. Modulus of subgrade reaction ("k") is used to represent the subgrade. c. Slab is considered as unreinforced concrete beam, so that any contribution made to flexural strength by the inclusion of distribution reinforcement is neglected. d. Combination of flexural and direct tensile stresses will result in transverse and longitudinal cracks. e. Supporting subbase and/or subgrade act as elastic material, regaining position after application of load. 4. The "Slab on Grade" worksheet allows the user to account for the effect of an additional post or wheel load. The increase in stress, 'i', due to a 2nd wheel (or post) load expressed as a percentage of stress for a single wheel (or post) load and is to be input by the user. Refer to the input comment box for recommendations. 5. All four (4) worksheets pertaining to the PCA Figures 3, 7a, 7b, and 7c from Reference (f) in item #1 above are based on interior load condition and other similar assumptions used in the "Slab on Grade" worksheet. Other assumed values used in the development of the Figures 3, 7a, 7b, and 7c are as follows: a. Modulus of elasticity for concrete, Ec = 4,000,000 psi. b. Poisson's Ratio for concrete, m = 0.15. 6. In the four (4) worksheets pertaining to the PCA Figures 3, 7a, 7b, and 7c, the user must manually determine (read) the required slab thickness from the design chart and must manually input that thickness in the appropriate cell at the bottom of the page. An interation or two may be required, as when the slab thickness is input, it may/may not change the effective contact area. Note: the user may unprotect the worksheet (no password is required) and access the Drawing Toolbar (select: View, Toolbars, and Drawing) to manually draw in (superimpose) the lines on the chart which are used to determine the required slab thickness. 7. This program contains numerous comment boxes which contain a wide variety of information including explanations of input or output items, equations used, data tables, etc. (Note: presence of a comment box is denoted by a red triangle in the upper right-hand corner of a cell. Merely move the mouse pointer to the desired cell to view the contents of that particular "comment box".)

LYSIS

heet rated Post or Wheel Loading ngle Wheel Loads st Loads (k = 50 pci) t Loads (k = 100 pci) t Loads (k = 200 pci) s for Wall Load onary Uniform Live Loads

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Interior Concentrated Post or Wheel Loading Assuming ACI-360 "Type B" Design - Reinforced for Shrinkage and Temperature Only Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker: Input Data:
Post Wheel

Slab Thickness, t = Concrete Strength, f 'c = Conc. Unit Weight, wc = Reinforcing Yield, fy = Subgrade Modulus, k = Concentrated Load, P = Contact Area, Ac = Factor of Safety, FS = Dowel Bar Dia., db = Dowel Bar Spacing, s = Const. Joint Width, z = Joint Spacing, L = Temperature Range, DT = Increase for 2nd Wheel, i =

8.000 5000 150 60000 100 12500.00 114.00 2.00 0.750 12.000 0.2500 20.000 50.00 15

in. psi pcf psi pci lbs. in.^2

Contact Area, Ac (Subgrade)

in. in. in. ft. deg. % Lubricate this end of all Dowels

Concrete Slab on Grade

Direction of pour Stop slab reinf. (As) at joint 1/8"-1/4" x t/4 formed joint

3/4"f Plain Dowels @ 12"

Results: Check Slab Flexural Stress: Effective Load Radius, a = Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = Modulus of Rupture, MR = Cracking Moment, Mr = Poisson's Ratio, m = Radius of Stiffness, Lr = Equivalent Radius, b = 1 Load: fb1(actual) = 2 Loads: fb2(actual) = Fb(allow) = Check Slab Bearing Stress: fp(actual) = Fp(allow) =

Typical Construction Joint for Load Transfer (assuming unreinforced slab with interior load condition) a = SQRT(Ac/p) Ec = 33*wc^1.5*SQRT(f 'c) MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) Mr = MR*(12*t^2/6)/12000 (per 1' = 12" width) m = 0.15 (assumed for concrete) Lr = (Ec*t^3/(12*(1-m^2)*k))^0.25 b = SQRT(1.6*a^2+t^2)-0.675*t , for a < 1.724*t fb1(actual) = 3*P*(1+m)/(2*p*t^2)*(LN(Lr/b)+0.6159) (Ref. 1) fb2(actual) = fb1(actual)*(1+i/100) Fb(allow) = MR/FS Fb(allow) >= fb(actual), O.K. (assuming working stress) fp(actual) = P/Ac Fp(allow) = 4.2*MR

6.024 4286826 636.40 6.79 0.15 36.985 5.648 267.58 307.72 318.20

in. psi psi ft-k/ft. in. in. psi psi psi

109.65 2672.86

psi psi

Fp(allow) >= fp(actual), O.K.

Check Slab Punching Shear Stress: bo = 42.708 fv(actual) = 20.91 Fv(allow) = 171.83 Shrinkage and Temperature Reinf.: Friction Factor, F = 1.50 Slab Weight, W = 100.00 Reinf. Allow. Stress, fs = 45000 As = 0.033

in. psi psi

(assuming working stress) bo = 4*SQRT(Ac) (assumed shear perimeter) fv(actual) = P/(t*(bo+4*t)) Fv(allow) = 0.27*MR Fv(allow) >= fv(actual), O.K. (assuming subgrade drag method) F = 1.5 (assumed friction factor between subgrade and slab) W = wc*(t/12) fs = 0.75*fy As = F*L*W/(2*fs)

psf psi in.^2/ft.

7 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

Determine Estimated Crack Width: Slab-base Frict. Adjust., C = 1.00 Thermal Expansion, a = 0.0000055 Shrinkage Coefficient, e = 0.00026 Est. Crack Width, DL = 0.1284

in./in./deg in./in. in.

(assuming no use of stabilized or granular subbase) C = 1.0 (assumed value for no subbase) a = 5.5x10^(-6) (assumed thermal expansion coefficient) e = 3.5x10^(-4) (assumed coefficient of shrinkage) DL = C*L*12*(a*DT+e)

Check Bearing Stress on Dowels at Construction Joints with Load Transfer:

Pt Le Le

s di d4 d3 d2 d1 d2 d3 d4 di

0*Pc (1-(4-1)*s/Le)*Pc (1-(3-1)*s/Le)*Pc (1-(2-1)*s/Le)*Pc

0*Pc (1-(4-1)*s/Le)*Pc (1-(3-1)*s/Le)*Pc (1-(2-1)*s/Le)*Pc

1.0*Pc

Assumed Load Transfer Distribution for Dowels at Construction Joint Le = 36.985 Effective Dowels, Ne = 3.11 Joint Load, Pt = 6250.00 Critical Dowel Load, Pc = 2011.88 Mod. of Dowel Suppt., kc = 1500000 Mod. of Elasticity, Eb = 29000000 Inertia/Dowel Bar, Ib = 0.0155 Relative Bar Stiffness, b = 0.889 fd(actual) = 5299.09 Fd(allow) = 5416.67
in. bars lbs. lbs. psi psi in.^4 psi psi

Le = 1.0*Lr = applicable dist. each side of critical dowel Ne = 1.0+2*S(1-d(n-1)*s/Le) (where: n = dowel #) Pt = 0.50*P (assumed load transferred across joint) Pc = Pt/Ne kc = 1.5x10^6 (assumed for concrete) Eb = 29x10^6 (assumed for steel dowels) Ib = p*db^4/64 b = (kc*db/(4*Eb*Ib))^(1/4) fd(actual) = kc*(Pc*(2+b*z)/(4*b^3*Eb*Ib)) Fd(allow) = (4-db)/3*f 'c Fd(allow) >= fd(actual), O.K.

References: 1. "Load Testing of Instumented Pavement Sections - Improved Techniques for Appling the Finite Element Method to Strain Predition in PCC Pavement Structures" - by University of Minnesota, Department of Civil Engineering (submitted to MN/DOT, March 24, 2002) 2. "Dowel Bar Opimization: Phases I and II - Final Report" - by Max L. Porter (Iowa State University, 2001) 3. "Design of Slabs-on-Ground" - ACI 360R-06 - by American Concrete Institute (2006) 4. "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" (IS195.01D) - by Robert G. Packard (Portland Cement Association, 1976) 5. "Streses and Stains in Rigid Pavements" (Lecture Notes 3) - by Charles Nunoo, Ph.D., P.E. (Florida International University, Miami FL - Fall 2002) Comments:

8 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

ding perature Only

Top/Slab

on Grade
Direction of pour Min. of t/3 or 2"
t/2

nt for Load Transfer

rior load condition)

r/b)+0.6159)

(Ref. 1)

ow) >= fb(actual), O.K.

(Ref. 4)

ow) >= fp(actual), O.K.

(Ref. 4)

ow) >= fv(actual), O.K.

(Ref. 3)

en subgrade and slab)

(continued)

9 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

pansion coefficient)
(Ref. 5) (Ref. 2)

ow) >= fd(actual), O.K.

Department of Civil

10 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE THICKNESS ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Single Wheel Loading from Vehicles with Pneumatic Tires Per PCA "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" - Figure 3, page 5 Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker:

Figure 3 Design Chart for Axles with Single Wheels

Input Data: Concrete Strength, f 'c = 5000 Subgrade Modulus, k = 100.00 Axle Load, Pa = 25000.00 Wheel Spacing, S = 37.00 Tire Inflation Pressure, Ip = 110.00 Factor of Safety, FS = 2.00 Results: Wheel Load, Pw = 12500.00 Tire Contact Area, Ac = 113.64 Effective Contact Area, Ac(eff) = 113.64 Concrete Flexual Strength, MR = 636.40 Concrete Working Stress, WS = 318.20 Slab Stress/1000 lb. Axle Load = 12.73 Slab Tickness, t = 7.900
lbs. in.^2 in.^2 psi psi psi in. psi pci lbs. in. psi

Instructions for Use of Figure 3: 1. Enter chart with slab stress = 12.73 2. Move to right to eff. contact area = 113.64 3. Move up/down to wheel spacing = 37 4. Move to right to subgrade modulus = 100 5. Read required slab thickness, t

Pw = Pa/2 (1/2 of axle load for 2 wheels/axle) Ac = Pw/Ip Ac(eff) = determined from Figure 5, page 6 MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) (Modulus of Rupture) WS = MR/FS Ss = WS/(Pa/1000) t = determined from Figure 3 above

11 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

SIS
Note: User MUST determine slab thickness from

umatic Tires - Figure 3, page 5

Effective Load Contact Area Based on Slab Thickness (values from PCA F

ntact area = 113.64

ade modulus = 100

ad for 2 wheels/axle)

12 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE THICKNESS ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Concentrated Post Loading (for k = 50 pci) Per PCA "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" - Figure 7a, page 9 Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker:

Figure 7a Design Chart for Post Loads, subgrade k = 50 pci

Input Data: Concrete Strength, f 'c = 5000 Subgrade Modulus, k = 50.00 Post Load, P = 13000.00 Post Spacing, y = 98.00 Post Spacing, x = 66.00 Load Contact Area, Ac = 64.00 Factor of Safety, FS = 3.00 Results: Effective Contact Area, Ac(eff) = Concrete Flexual Strength, MR = Concrete Working Stress, WS = Slab Stress/1000 lb. Post Load = Slab Tickness, t = 76.34 636.40 212.13 16.32 10.800
in.^2 psi psi psi in. psi pci lbs. in. in. in.^2

Instructions for Use of Figure 7a : 1. Enter chart with slab stress = 16.32 2. Move to right to eff. contact area = 76.34 3. Move to right to post spacing, y = 98 4. Move up/down to post spacing, x = 66 5. Move to right to slab thickness, t

Ac(eff) = determined from Figure 5, page 6 MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) (Modulus of Rupture) WS = MR/FS Ss = WS/(P/1000) t = determined from Figure 7a above

13 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

SIS
Note: User MUST determine slab thickness from

pci) - Figure 7a, page 9

Figure 8 - Post Configurations and Loads for which Figures 7a, 7b, and 7c Apply

Effective Load Contact Area Based on Slab Thickness (values from PCA F

ntact area = 76.34

14 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE THICKNESS ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Concentrated Post Loading (for k = 100 pci) Per PCA "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" - Figure 7b, page 10 Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker:

Figure 7b Design Chart for Post Loads, subgrade k = 100 pci

Input Data: Concrete Strength, f 'c = 5000 Subgrade Modulus, k = 100.00 Post Load, P = 13000.00 Post Spacing, y = 98.00 Post Spacing, x = 66.00 Load Contact Area, Ac = 64.00 Factor of Safety, FS = 3.00 Results: Effective Contact Area, Ac(eff) = Concrete Flexual Strength, MR = Concrete Working Stress, WS = Slab Stress/1000 lb. Post Load = Slab Tickness, t = 70.03 636.40 212.13 16.32 9.800
in.^2 psi psi psi in. psi pci lbs. in. in. in.^2

Instructions for Use of Figure 7b: 1. Enter chart with slab stress = 16.32 2. Move to right to eff. contact area = 70.03 3. Move to right to post spacing, y = 98 4. Move up/down to post spacing, x = 66 5. Move to right to slab thickness, t

Ac(eff) = determined from Figure 5, page 6 MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) (Modulus of Rupture) WS = MR/FS Ss = WS/(P/1000) t = determined from Figure 7b above

15 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

SIS
Note: User MUST determine slab thickness from

0 pci) - Figure 7b, page 10

Figure 8 - Post Configurations and Loads for which Figures 7a, 7b, and 7c Apply

Effective Load Contact Area Based on Slab Thickness (values from PCA F

ntact area = 70.03

16 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE THICKNESS ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Concentrated Post Loading (for k = 200 pci) Per PCA "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" - Figure 7c, page 11 Job Name: Subject: Job Number: Originator: Checker:

Figure 7c Design Chart for Post Loads, subgrade k = 200 pci

Input Data: Concrete Strength, f 'c = 5000 Subgrade Modulus, k = 200.00 Post Load, P = 13000.00 Post Spacing, y = 98.00 Post Spacing, x = 66.00 Load Contact Area, Ac = 64.00 Factor of Safety, FS = 3.00 Results: Effective Contact Area, Ac(eff) = Concrete Flexual Strength, MR = Concrete Working Stress, WS = Slab Stress/1000 lb. Post Load = Slab Tickness, t = 68.02 636.40 212.13 16.32 9.200
in.^2 psi psi psi in. psi pci lbs. in. in. in.^2

Instructions for Use of Figure 7c: 1. Enter chart with slab stress = 16.32 2. Move to right to eff. contact area = 68.02 3. Move to right to post spacing, y = 98 4. Move up/down to post spacing, x = 66 5. Move to right to slab thickness, t

Ac(eff) = determined from Figure 5, page 6 MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) (Modulus of Rupture) WS = MR/FS Ss = WS/(P/1000) t = determined from Figure 7c above

17 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

SIS
Note: User MUST determine slab thickness from

0 pci) - Figure 7c, page 11

Figure 8 - Post Configurations and Loads for which Figures 7a, 7b, and 7c Apply

Effective Load Contact Area Based on Slab Thickness (values from PCA F

ntact area = 68.02

18 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Continuous Line Loading from Wall Job Name: Job Number: Subject: Originator:
Wall Wall

Checker:

Input Data: Slab Thickness, t = Concrete Strength, f 'c = Subgrade Modulus, k = Wall Load, P = 12.000 3500 100 1263.00
in. psi pci lb./ft.

P Dowel (at Joint)

(Subgrade)

Concrete Slab Loaded Near Center or at Joint

Wall P

Results: Design Parameters: Modulus of Rupture, MR = Allow. Bending Stress, Fb = Factor of Safety, FS = Section Modulus, S = Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = Width, b = Moment of Inertia, I = Stiffness Factor, l = Coefficient, Blx =

(Subgrade)

Concrete Slab Loaded Near Free Edge 532.45 94.66 5.625 288.00 3372165 12.00 1728.00 0.0151 0.3224
psi psi in.^3/ft. psi in. in.^4

MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) Fb = 1.6*SQRT(f 'c) (as recommended in reference below) FS = MR/Fb S = b*t^2/6 Ec = 57000*SQRT(f 'c) b = 12" (assumed) I = b*t^3/12 l = (k*b/(4*Ec*I))^(0.25) Blx = coefficient from "Beams on Elastic Foundations " by M. Hetenyi

Wall Load Near Center of Slab or Keyed/Doweled Joints: Pc = 4*Fb*S*l Allowable Wall Load, Pc = 1642.57 lb./ft. = 12.8*SQRT(f 'c)*t^2*(k/(19000*SQRT(f 'c)*t^3))^(0.25) Pc(allow) >= P, O.K. Wall Load Near Free Edge of Slab: Pe = Fb*S*l/Blx Allowable Wall Load, Pe = 1273.70 lb./ft. = 9.9256*SQRT(f 'c)*t^2*(k/(19000*SQRT(f 'c)*t^3))^(0.25) Reference: Pe(allow) >= P, O.K. "Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads" Army Technical Manual TM 5-809-12, Air Force Manual AFM 88-3, Chapter 15 (1987) Comments:

19 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

Top/Slab

ar Center or at Joint

Top/Slab

Near Free Edge

ed in reference below)

stic Foundations "

QRT(f 'c)*t^3))^(0.25) Pc(allow) >= P, O.K.

*SQRT(f 'c)*t^3))^(0.25) Pe(allow) >= P, O.K.

20 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ANALYSIS

For Slab Subjected to Stationary Uniformly Distributed Live Loads Job Name: Job Number: Subject: Originator:

Checker:

Input Data:
85

Slab Thickness, t = Concrete Strength, f 'c = Subgrade Modulus, k = Factor of Safety, FS = Uniform Live Load, wLL =

3.000 3500 100 2.000 550.00

in. psi pci psf

wLL

wLL

(Subgrade)

Concrete Slab on Grade with Uniform Loads

*Note: In an unjointed aisleway between uniformly distributed load areas, negative bending moment in slab may be up to twice as great as positive moment in slab beneath loaded area. Allowable uniform load determined below is based on critical aisle width and as a result, there are no restrictions on load layout configuration or uniformity of loading.

Results: Design Parameters: Modulus of Rupture, MR = Allow. Bending Stress, Fb = Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = Poisson's Ratio, m = Radius of Stiffness, Lr = Critical Aisle Width, Wcr =

532.45 266.22 3372165 0.15 16.69 3.07

psi psi

in. ft.

MR = 9*SQRT(f 'c) Fb = MR/FS Ec = 57000*SQRT(f 'c) m = 0.15 (assumed for concrete) Lr = (Ec*t^3/(12*(1-m^2)*k))^0.25 Wcr = (2.209*Lr)/12 (Ref. 3, Appendix 2 page 64)
(presented for information only)

Stationary Uniformly Distributed Live Loads: Per Ref. #1: wLL(allow) = 647.54 psf

wLL(allow) = 257.876*Fb*SQRT(k*t/Ec) wLL(allow) >= wLL, O.K. wLL(allow) = 0.123*Fb*SQRT(k*t) wLL(allow) >= wLL, O.K.

Per Ref. #2: wLL(allow) =

567.17

psf

Reference: 1. "Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads" Army Technical Manual TM 5-809-12, Air Force Manual AFM 88-3, Chapter 15 (1987) 2. "Slab Thickness Design for Industrial Concrete Floors on Grade" (IS195.01D) by Robert G. Packard (Portland Cement Association, 1976) 3. "Design of Slabs-on-Ground" - ACI 360R-06 - by American Concrete Institute Comments:

21 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM

"GRDSLAB.xls" Program Version 1.5

oads

Top/Slab

with Uniform Loads

22 of 22

5/2/2012 1:33 PM