0% found this document useful (0 votes)
189 views5 pages

Nyborg (2008) - Kjeller Field Data

This document provides a status update on the development of guidelines for predicting CO2 corrosion in oil and gas production systems. It summarizes the results of joint industry projects evaluating multiple corrosion models and field data cases. A draft document was written for the guidelines and reviewed by industry operators, but will now be issued by the Institute for Energy Technology as an open report, rather than an industry standard. It describes the proposed steps and factors to consider for preliminary and rigorous corrosion prediction and includes an appendix listing all models evaluated in prior projects.

Uploaded by

CharlyBoeing
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
189 views5 pages

Nyborg (2008) - Kjeller Field Data

This document provides a status update on the development of guidelines for predicting CO2 corrosion in oil and gas production systems. It summarizes the results of joint industry projects evaluating multiple corrosion models and field data cases. A draft document was written for the guidelines and reviewed by industry operators, but will now be issued by the Institute for Energy Technology as an open report, rather than an industry standard. It describes the proposed steps and factors to consider for preliminary and rigorous corrosion prediction and includes an appendix listing all models evaluated in prior projects.

Uploaded by

CharlyBoeing
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Status on CO2 corrosion prediction document

Rolf Nyborg Institute for Energy Technology

2008-09-18

Background
Joint industry projects at IFE 1998 - 2008
Kjeller Field Data Project I (1998 - 2000)
Evaluation of CO2 corrosion models and collection of field data

Kjeller Field Data Project II (2001 - 2003)


Development of internal corrosion field database

KICCME Project (2004 - 2008)


Kjeller Internal Corrosion Compilation and Models Evaluation

An operators' group for preparation of a draft document for guidelines for CO2 corrosion prediction was formed in parallel with the IFE joint industry projects
9 meetings in 2003 - 2008

2008-09-18

Results from IFE JIPs


The various models can give very different results Main differences between the models:
Prediction of oil or water wetting Effect of corrosion product films

More than 80 different field data cases collected in a database Some of the results published at NACE conferences
Rolf Nyborg: "Overview of CO2 Corrosion Models for Wells and Pipelines", CORROSION/2002, Paper No. 02233 Rolf Nyborg: "Field data collection, evaluation and use for corrosivity prediction and validation of models, Part II: Evaluation of field data and comparison of prediction models", CORROSION/2006, Paper No. 06118

2008-09-18

Models evaluated in Kjeller Field Data Projects


de Waard et al (Shell) NORSOK model (Statoil, Saga, Hydro) HYDROCOR (Shell) Cassandra (BP) CORMED (Elf) LIPUCOR (Total) CORPLUS (Total) KSC Model (IFE) ECE model (Intetech) SweetCor (Shell) OLI model (OLI Systems) PREDICT (InterCorr) Tulsa model (University of Tulsa) Jepson model (University of Ohio) MULTICORP (University of Ohio) Corpos (CorrOcean) ULL model (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) DREAM (Oklahoma State University)

2008-09-18

Document for corrosion prediction


Guideline for Corrosion/corrosivity Prediction in Oil and Gas Production Systems Objective
Guideline for CO2 corrosion prediction Provide engineering companies, contractors and suppliers with guidelines for corrosion prediction during design

Draft document submitted to EFC for consideration as an EFC document Presented at EFC WP13 meeting in Maastricht in 2006 Decided at WP13 meeting in Freiburg in 2007 not to publish as an EFC document

2008-09-18

Severity levels
Focuses on severity level rather than predicted corrosion rate
Table 1: Severity levels Severity level 1 2 3 4 5 0.01 0.1 1.0 Unmitigated corrosion rate (mm/yr) < > 0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0 10.0

2008-09-18

Proposed steps for corrosion prediction


Step I: Normally used for preliminary design or early assessment when only limited data are available
Factors to be considered Carbon dioxide CO2 / H2S ratio Temperature calculated pH Prediction model Input parameters PTotal, %CO2, fCO2=a.PCO2 PCO2/ PH2S > 500 - 1000 T
HCO 3 , PCO2, PH2S, total

notes (1)

(2), (3) (4)

organic acid species PCO2, T, pH

(4) Any model evaluated for this purpose. A brief description of some models is given in Appendix 1

2008-09-18

Proposed steps for corrosion prediction


Step II: Rigorous assessment of predicted corrosion rate for final design and assessment when more detailed data are available
Factors to be considered Protectiveness of the film Flow factors Type of corrosion Wetting effect Organic acids impact Input parameters T and PCO2 for FeCO3 film Flow regime and velocity Pitting or general Oil/water wetting properties Total organic acid species, pH (Impact on the protectiveness) Total organic acid species, consistency check of formation water Operator defined (8) notes (6) (7)

pH effect

(3) (9) (4)

Prediction model

2008-09-18

Appendix 1: Examples of models


Listing and short description with references of models which have been evaluated in the IFE Joint Industry Projects Include all models which have been evaluated in these projects Not only a few selected models as in previous version of the document Choice of model left to the user

2008-09-18

Status of the document


Issue as an open document by IFE Will undergo a final review in the operators group with a meeting in November 2008 Will be issued as an open IFE report early in 2009 Will be put on IFE's website for free download: www.ife.no You can notify Rolf Nyborg if you want the document when it is finished: [email protected]

2008-09-18

10

You might also like