Exchange Rate Systems
Exchange Rate Systems
The Gold Standard Pre World War 2 The Bretton Woods System Period From 1944 until 1971/73 . Flexible Exchange Rate Systems From 1973 Onwards
The conference produced a commitment to a modified fixed-exchange rate system called an adjustable-peg system
The Bretton Woods System Period From 1944 until 1971/73 Creation of the System Post World War 2
establish a stable exchange rate system The new system sought to capture the advantages of the old gold standard (fixed exchange rate) while avoiding its disadvantages (painful domestic macroeconomic adjustments).
Under the Bretton Woods system there were three main sources of the needed pounds:
Official reserves The United States might currently possess pounds in its official reserves as the result of past actions against a payments surplus. Gold sales The U.S. government might sell some of its gold to Britain for pounds. The proceeds would then be offered in the exchange market to augment the supply of pounds. IMF borrowing The needed pounds might be borrowed from the IMF. Nations participating in the Bretton Woods system were required to make contributions to the IMF based on the size of their national income, population, and volume of trade. If necessary, the United States could borrow pounds on a short-term basis from the IMF by supplying its own currency as collateral.
2.
So higher demand for a currency, all else equal, would lead to an appreciation of the currency. Lower demand, all else equal, would lead to a depreciation of the currency. An increase in the supply of a currency, all else equal, will lead to a depreciation of that currency while a decrease in supply, all else equal, will lead to an appreciation.
Essentially, we can characterize the equilibrium exchange rate under a flexible exchange rate system as the value that is consistent with covered and uncovered interest rate parity given values for the expected future spot rate and the forward exchange rate.
3.
4.
Since 1971, economies have been moving towards flexible exchange rate systems although only relatively few currencies are classifiable as truly floating exchange rates.
Most OECD countries have flexible exchange rate systems: the U.S., Canada, Australia, Britain, and the European Monetary Union.
5.
2.
3.
4.
Example: Suppose that Thailand had a managed floating rate system and that the Thai central bank wants to keep the value of the Baht close to 25 Baht/$. In a managed floating regime, the Thai central bank is willing to tolerate small fluctuations in the exchange rate (say from 24.75 to 25.25) without getting involved in the market.
8. Suppose the central rate was 0.5 British pounds/German mark. Then the pound-mark exchange rate would be allowed to fluctuate in the range 0.48875 Pounds/DM and 0.51125 Pounds/DM. However, if the pound depreciated and the exchange rate approached 0.51125 Pounds/DM or if the pound appreciated and the exchange rate approached 0.48875 Pounds/DM, the Bank of England would intervene to make sure that the exchange rate never went outside the range.
A crawling peg is applied when it is expected that the inflation rate in a country will tend to be higher than abroad over a longer period of time. Then the exchange rate is brought in line with the inflation differential, normally with a preannounced rate of change of the exchange rate. It may be used when a country wants to get out of a hyper inflation or after a currency reform.
Crawling Peg
Dollarization
In dollarization, the foreign currency is used as legal tender in dayto-day operations. The country no longer issues its own money; it does not have a central bank.
Foreign Exchange
In the international foreign exchange market, the US dollar is the dominating currency. Of the total transactions in the international currency markets, 89 percent have the US dollar on one side of the transaction, 37 percent the euro. The yen and the sterling follow with 20 respectively 17 percent. The daily average turnover on the foreign exchange market amounts to US$4 trillion. Spot market transactions account for US$ 620 billion. Outright forwards for US$ 208 billion. Foreign exchange swaps for US$ 944 billion.